LER-1999-006, Forwards LER 99-006-01 Describing Condition Which Resulted in Exceeding TS Requirements for CIVs & TS 4.0.4 for Generic Requirements for Surveillance Testing.Rev Includes Results of Investigation Into Failure to Recognize TS Requirements |
| Event date: |
|
|---|
| Report date: |
|
|---|
| 4001999006R01 - NRC Website |
|
text
REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9908100055 DOC.DATE: 99/08/04 NOTARIZED: NO FACIL:50-400.Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Carolin'a AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION CLARK,B.H.
Carolina'ower
& Light Co.
RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Records Management Branch (Document Control Desk)
DOCKET ¹ 05000400
SUBJECT:
Forwards LER 99-006-01 describing condiiton which resulted in exceeding TS requirements for CIVs
& TS 4.0.4 for generic requirements for surveillance testing.Rev includes results of investigation into failure to recognize TS requirements.
DISTRIBUTION CODE:
IE22T COPIES RECEIVED: LTRi ENCL i SIZE: \\
TITLE: 50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc.
NOTES:Application for permit renewal filed.
05000400 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME LPD2-2 PD INTERNAL: ACRS NRR/DIPM/IOLB NRR/DSSA/SPLB RES/DRAA/OERAB EXTERNAL: L ST LOBBY WARD NOAC POORE,W.
NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL
'1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME LAUFER,R FILE CE ER RES/DET/ERAB RGN2 FILE 01 LMITCO MARSHALL NOAC QUEENER,DS NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 1
1 NOTE TO ALL "RZDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTETH TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LIS'R REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTRi DESK (DCD)
ON EXTENSION 415-2083 FULL TEXT CONVERSION REQUIRED TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED:
LTTR 16 ENCL 16
Carolina Power & Ught Company Harris Nuclear Plant P.O. Box 165 New HillNC 27562 AUG -4 1999 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Serial: HNP-99-122 10CFR50.73 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-400 LICENSE NO. NPF-63 LICENSEE EVENT REPORT 1999-006-01 Sir or Madam:
In accordance with 10CFR50.73, the enclosed Licensee Event Repor't is submitted. This report describes a condition which resulted in exceeding the requirements of Technical Specifications for Containment Isolation Valves and Technical Specification 4.0.4 for generic requirements for surveillance testing. This revision includes results of an investigation into the failure of the plant staff to recognize the applicability ofTechnical Specification requirements.
Sincerely, B.H.
ar General Manager Harris Plant MSE/mse Enclosure c:
Mr. J. B. Brady (HNP Senior NRC Resident)
Mr. R. J. Laufer (NRC - NRR Project Manager)
Mr. L. A. Reyes (NRC Regional Administrator, Region II)
~S08<00055 990eoe PDR ADQCK 05000400
,S PDR
$ Q (! i,'. U L, 5413 Shearon Harris Road New HillNC
V
|
|---|
|
|
| | | Reporting criterion |
|---|
| 05000400/LER-1999-001, :on 990106,SF Pool Water Level Was Not Maintained Greater than 23 Feet Above Stored BWR Fuel Assemblies.Caused by Fasteners Bending Under Specific Circumstances.Increased Water Level.With |
- on 990106,SF Pool Water Level Was Not Maintained Greater than 23 Feet Above Stored BWR Fuel Assemblies.Caused by Fasteners Bending Under Specific Circumstances.Increased Water Level.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1999-002, :on 990114,RT Due to Not Removing Temporary Device from Relay Following Calibration Was Noted.Caused by Human Error.Counseled Personnel Involved in Event.With |
- on 990114,RT Due to Not Removing Temporary Device from Relay Following Calibration Was Noted.Caused by Human Error.Counseled Personnel Involved in Event.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)
10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(vii)
10 CFR 50.73(e)(2)(iii) | | 05000400/LER-1999-003, :on 990123,noted That Plant Was Outside Design Basis Due to Isolation of Fire Protection Containment Sprinkler Sys.Caused by Human Error.Restored Containment Sprinkler Sys to Operable Status.With |
- on 990123,noted That Plant Was Outside Design Basis Due to Isolation of Fire Protection Containment Sprinkler Sys.Caused by Human Error.Restored Containment Sprinkler Sys to Operable Status.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1999-004, :on 990312,unit Trip Was Noted.Caused by Degraded Condition of SG Water Level Flow Control Valve. Replaced Positioners on All Three FW Regulating Valves.With |
- on 990312,unit Trip Was Noted.Caused by Degraded Condition of SG Water Level Flow Control Valve. Replaced Positioners on All Three FW Regulating Valves.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2) | | 05000400/LER-1999-005, :on 990313,plant Exceeded ESFAS TS 3.3.2,Action 21.Caused by Inadequate Procedure Rev Preparation.Licensee Revised Applicable Maint Surveillance Test Procedure (MST-10072) to Identify TS Required Actions.With |
- on 990313,plant Exceeded ESFAS TS 3.3.2,Action 21.Caused by Inadequate Procedure Rev Preparation.Licensee Revised Applicable Maint Surveillance Test Procedure (MST-10072) to Identify TS Required Actions.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1999-006-01, Forwards LER 99-006-01 Describing Condition Which Resulted in Exceeding TS Requirements for CIVs & TS 4.0.4 for Generic Requirements for Surveillance Testing.Rev Includes Results of Investigation Into Failure to Recognize TS | Forwards LER 99-006-01 Describing Condition Which Resulted in Exceeding TS Requirements for CIVs & TS 4.0.4 for Generic Requirements for Surveillance Testing.Rev Includes Results of Investigation Into Failure to Recognize TS Requirements | | | 05000400/LER-1999-006, :on 981124,noted Failure to Comply with TS 4.0.4 & TS 3/4.6.3, Civs. Caused by post-maint Testing That Did Not Adequately Test Control Circuitry & Verify Isolation Time Following Maint.Procedure Was Revised |
- on 981124,noted Failure to Comply with TS 4.0.4 & TS 3/4.6.3, Civs. Caused by post-maint Testing That Did Not Adequately Test Control Circuitry & Verify Isolation Time Following Maint.Procedure Was Revised
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1999-007-02, :on 990811,determined That Cvis ARMs High Alarm Setpoints Were Not within TS Limit.Caused by Not Having Procedure to Verify If Cvis ARM High Alarm Setpoints Were within TS Requirements.Revised Procedures.With |
- on 990811,determined That Cvis ARMs High Alarm Setpoints Were Not within TS Limit.Caused by Not Having Procedure to Verify If Cvis ARM High Alarm Setpoints Were within TS Requirements.Revised Procedures.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v), Loss of Safety Function
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iv), System Actuation
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(x)
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(iii)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(viii) | | 05000400/LER-1999-008-01, :on 991008,CR Emergency Filtration Sys Tech Specs Occurred.Caused by Site Personnel Failed to Recognize That Blocking Open CR Emergency Filtration Sys.Procedures Revised.With |
- on 991008,CR Emergency Filtration Sys Tech Specs Occurred.Caused by Site Personnel Failed to Recognize That Blocking Open CR Emergency Filtration Sys.Procedures Revised.With
| 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(vii), Common Cause Inoperability
10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)
10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(ii), Degraded or Unanalyzed Condition
10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(v)
10 CFR 50.73(s)(2)(iv) |
|
