05000219/LER-1982-036, Forwards LER 82-036/03L-0.Detailed Event Analysis Encl

From kanterella
(Redirected from 05000219/LER-1982-036)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards LER 82-036/03L-0.Detailed Event Analysis Encl
ML20055B418
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 07/14/1982
From: Fiedler P
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To: Haynes R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20055B419 List:
References
NUDOCS 8207220199
Download: ML20055B418 (3)


LER-2082-036, Forwards LER 82-036/03L-0.Detailed Event Analysis Encl
Event date:
Report date:
2192082036R00 - NRC Website

text

'

l 1

GPU Nuclear NUC Mr P.O. Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 609-693-6000 Writer's Direct Dial Number:

July 14, 1982 Mr. Ronald C. Haynes, Administrator Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406

Dear Mr. Haynes:

Subj ec t: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 Licensee Event Report l Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/82-36/03L '

This letter forwards three copies of a Licensee Event Report to report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/82-36/03L in compliance with paragraphs 6.9 2.b.2 and 6.9 2.b.3 of the Technical Specifications.

Very truly yours, Peter B. Fiedler Vice President and Director Oyster Creek PEF:1se Enclosures cc: Director (40 copies) l Office of Inspection and Enforcement

[

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

Washington, D.C. 20555 Director (3)

Office of Management Information and Program Control U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 NRC Resident Inspector i Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731 8207220199 820714 PDR ADOCK 05000219 S PDR __

GPU Nuclear is a part of the General Pubhc Utikties System "Ib

0YSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION Forked River, New Jersey 08731 Licensee Event Report Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/82-36/03L T

Report Date July-14, 1982 Occurrence Date June 18, 1982 Identification of Occurrence Due to an inadequacy in the implementation of procedural controls, Core Spray Pump "A" was taken out of service for approximately 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. This led to operation in a degraded mode permitted by a limiting condition -for operation as specified in the Technical Specifications, paragraph 3.4.A.4.

, This event is considered to be a reportable occurrence per Technical Specifications, paragraphs 6.9.2.b.2 and 6.9.2.b.3.

Conditions Prior to Occurrence The reactor was in steady state operation.

Thermal Power: 1550 M.;t Electrical Power: 512 MWe Description of Occurrence While perfonning maintenance on Control Rod Drive (CRD) pump "A", mechanics noticed that water from the disassembled CRD pwnp "A" was overflowing from the temporary drain assembly onto the core spray pump "A" motor housing.

Apparent Cause of Occurrence While reassembling CRD pump "A" casing, mechanics noticed that the drain assembly placed beneath the pump casing could not sufficiently paso the leakage draining from the 3" pump suction piping. This water overflowed from the drain assembly onto core spray pump "A" directly beneath the work area. Concern was expressed over the possibility of water leakage onto electrical components of the core spray pump "A" motor. Core spray pump "A" was subsequently taken out of service as a precautionary measure.

J

_ _- , . . . . _ - . . .,.,m

- _ , ~ _ .- _ _ . - _ - , - _ -

Licensee Event Report Page 2 Reportable Occurrence No. 50-219/82-36/03L Analysis of Occurrence The core spray system utilizes two redundant loops with 4 pumps per loop to provide a supply of low pressure coolant in case of a pipe break in the reactor primary system.

The required surveillance was performed on the redundant pump and it was confirmed to be operable.

As the redundant pump in the loop, as well as the redundant loop, were operable, the safety significance is considered minimal.

Corrective Ac tion Core Spray Pump "A" was removed from service and excess moisture was removed from the motor housing. Electricians then performed a megger check of the -

insulation resistance of the "A" pump motor with satisfactory results. An operability check was satisfactorily performed prior to placing the pump back in service.

The appropriate maintenance procedures for the CRD pumps will be revised as required to assure proper system draining techniques are used to prevent a recurrence of this event. In addition, this event will be placed on the required teading list for mechanics to increase their awareness of the possible effect of maintenance on adjacent safety-related equipment.

Failure Data Not Applicable.