ML20111C467

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:56, 23 September 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Corrected Paragraph to Replace Jumbled Paragraph in Re Joint Intervenors 841107 Motion to Reopen
ML20111C467
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/11/1985
From: Bernabei L
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, JOINT INTERVENORS - WATERFORD
To: Asselstine J, Palladino N, Roberts T
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
CON-#185-995 OL, NUDOCS 8503150407
Download: ML20111C467 (1)


Text

-

998 GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT 1555 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 202 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) (32-8550 f

Hand-DelDer'dd % +,.[,, N -

a x,

y r

March 11, $9 5 s 0 ED 9

Nunzio Palladino, Chairman NA10:08 Thomas Roberts, Commissioner James Asselstine, Commissioner D gg ,,,

Frederick Bernthal, Commissioner -

% p7' 7 -

-e Lando Zech, Commissioner 8##NC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Waehington, D.C. 20555

Dear Commissioners:

A paragraph of my letter of March 8, 1985 to you was jumbled. Therefore, please substitute for,the last ,

paragraph on the first page the following, paragraph: -

l In the event the Commission determines that the Appeal Board does not have jurisdiction to consider Joint Intervenors' Motion to Reopen, filed on November 7, 1984, we will file the identical Motion with all supporting ,3 documentation with the Commission. Of course, if the '-

Commission decides on March 15 that the Appeal Board does not have jurisdiction to decide our Motion, but at the same time votes to authorize full power operation of Waterford, Joint Intervenors will be foreclosed from pursuing their l

Motion to Reopen in any NRC forum and prejudiced by the Commissioner's failure to review ALAB-797 in a timely manner.

Therefore, Joint Intervenors request that the Commission defer any vote on issuance of a full-power license to l Waterford 3 until cuch time as the Appeal Board has decided Joint Intervenors' Motion to Reopen, or, if the Commission

! determines that it is the appropriate fortun to consider Joint IntervenoriF Motion, until Joint Intervenors have had l

an opportunity to resubmit their Motion and have it decided by the Commission.

I regret any inconvenience this may have caused you, i

Sincerely yours, 8503150407 850311 PDR ADOCK 0500 h, ;2 p4 ]

O L:rn e Bernabel Atto ney for Joint Intervenors cc: Waterford Service List 3SO3