ML20111B121
| ML20111B121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1985 |
| From: | Bernabei L GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT, JOINT INTERVENORS - WATERFORD |
| To: | Asselstine J, Palladino N, Roberts T NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| CON-#185-994 ALAB-797, OL, NUDOCS 8503130002 | |
| Download: ML20111B121 (2) | |
Text
. _
cicg)
GCVERNMENT ^CCOUNTABILl1Y PROJECT 1555 Connecti ur Awmue, N.W., Suite 202 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202)232-8550 w..
Hand-Delivered
'i5 '-
h:1:04 CEF March 8, 1985 G CC $'?'T.. g $
g e: -
-:A 4 3:gC Nunzio Palladino, Chairman Thomas Roberts, Commissioner James Asselstine, Commissioner Frederick Bernthal, Commissioner 397)[) ( )
Lando Zech, Commissioner 00CKET NUtIBM U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission W*""
"~~~~
Washington, D.C.
20555
{
Dear Commissioners:
I understand that the Commission will be meeting on Friday, March 15, to discuss the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3, and possibly to vote on issuance of a full-power licensee to applicant Louisiana Power & Light Company (LP&L).
I also understand that the Commission has extended until March 15 the time within which it may review the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board taking jurisdiction over Joint Intervenors' Motion to Reopen on Quality Assurance and Character and Competence Contentions, ALAB-797.
I represent the Joint Intervenors' in the Waterford licensing proceedings.
They have filed two motions to reopen licensing hearings, both of which are currently pending before the Appeal Board.
In the event the Commission determines that the Appeal Board does not have jurisdiction to consider Joint Intervenors' Motion to Reopen, filed on November 7, 1984, we will file the identical Motion with all supporting documentation with the Commission.
Of course, if the Commission decides on March 15 that the Appeal Board does not have jurisdiction to decide our Motion, but at the same time, votes to authorize issuance of a full-power license to Waterford, Joint Intervenors will be foreclosed from pursuing their Motion to reopen any vote on i
issuance of a full-power license to Waterford 3 until such time as Joint Intervenors have had an opportunity to have their Motion decided by the Appeal Board, or until such time as the Commission determines definitely which forum may consider Joint Intervenors' Motion and permits an appropriate period of time for resubmission of Motion if necessary.
f 8503130002 850308
-]- C/-
PDR ADOCK 05000382
\\
O PDR
U.S. Nucloor R0gulatory Commission March 8, 1985 Page Two Further, Joint Intervenors request that you de: lay any issuance of a full-power license to LP&L for a two-week period after making a decision that such authorization is appropriate in order to permit Joint Intervenors time to seek court review.
As you know, you have permitted parties in both the Diablo Canyon and the Shoreham proceedings " grace periods" in which to appeal rulings authorizing low-and full-power licenses.
I would appreciate a response to my letter expeditiously.
l Thank you for your consideration of my requests.
i Sincerely yours.
l
^
,.N U E
/ s y li
. !,t v
Lynne Bernabei Attorney for Joint Intervenors cc:
Waterford Service List 1
t
-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - -..