IR 05000369/1988012: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Adams
{{Adams
| number = ML20155J341
| number = ML20204H279
| issue date = 05/31/1988
| issue date = 10/06/1988
| title = Insp Repts 50-369/88-12 & 50-370/88-12 on 880423-0520. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations Safety Verification,Surveillance Testing,Maint Activities & Followup on Previous Insp Findings
| title = Ack Receipt of 880921 Revised Response Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/88-12 & 50-370/88-12.NRC Understands That Tech Spec 4.7.1.2.b.2 Should Have Been Ref in Section 4 of Response
| author name = Croteau R, Nelson D, Orders W, Peebles T
| author name = Brownlee V
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name =  
| addressee name = Tucker H
| addressee affiliation =  
| addressee affiliation = DUKE POWER CO.
| docket = 05000369, 05000370
| docket = 05000369, 05000370
| license number =  
| license number =  
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = 50-369-88-12, 50-370-88-12, NUDOCS 8806200486
| document report number = NUDOCS 8810240372
| package number = ML20155J318
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 1
| page count = 11
}}
}}


Line 19: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ - - - - - - - - - - - .- - _
    ;
. ~
  *
OCT 0C MB
,
Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17
/DukePowerCompany ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President Nuclear Production Department 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: REPORT N05. 50-369/88-12 AND 50-370/88-12 Thank you for your revised response of September 21, 1988, to our Notice of Violation issued on June 6,1988, concerr.'ing activities conducted at your McGuire facility. We have evaluated your response and fuund that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201. We will examine the implementation of your corrective actions during future inspection In Section 4 of your response, Corrective Steps to be taken to avoid further violations, you refer to Technical Specification 4.7.1.2.b.3. We understand that the Technical Specification referenced should have been 4.7.1.2. We appreciate your cooperation in this matte
 
Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY VIRGIL L BRCWNLEE Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects cc:! . TL. McConnell, Station Manager Wenfor Resident Inspector - Catawba State of South Carolina bec:IRCResidentInspector DRS, Technical Assistant VD. Hood, NRR Document Control Desk 0G10240372 8G1006 DR  ADOCK O'300 9 R!!  g  RIL A Af/  44 I 886nser  TPeebles i 10/8f/83  10/j/88  7 t
 
      .r:eoi
}}
}}

Latest revision as of 15:28, 30 December 2020

Ack Receipt of 880921 Revised Response Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-369/88-12 & 50-370/88-12.NRC Understands That Tech Spec 4.7.1.2.b.2 Should Have Been Ref in Section 4 of Response
ML20204H279
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/1988
From: Brownlee V
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Tucker H
DUKE POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8810240372
Download: ML20204H279 (1)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ - - - - - - - - - - - .- - _

. ~

OCT 0C MB

,

Docket Nos. 50-369, 50-370 License Nos. NPF-9, NPF-17

/DukePowerCompany ATTN: Mr. H. B. Tucker, Vice President Nuclear Production Department 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: REPORT N05. 50-369/88-12 AND 50-370/88-12 Thank you for your revised response of September 21, 1988, to our Notice of Violation issued on June 6,1988, concerr.'ing activities conducted at your McGuire facility. We have evaluated your response and fuund that it meets the requirements of 10 CFR 2.201. We will examine the implementation of your corrective actions during future inspection In Section 4 of your response, Corrective Steps to be taken to avoid further violations, you refer to Technical Specification 4.7.1.2.b.3. We understand that the Technical Specification referenced should have been 4.7.1.2. We appreciate your cooperation in this matte

Sincerely, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY VIRGIL L BRCWNLEE Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects cc:! . TL. McConnell, Station Manager Wenfor Resident Inspector - Catawba State of South Carolina bec:IRCResidentInspector DRS, Technical Assistant VD. Hood, NRR Document Control Desk 0G10240372 8G1006 DR ADOCK O'300 9 R!! g RIL A Af/ 44 I 886nser TPeebles i 10/8f/83 10/j/88 7 t

.r:eoi

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000369/1988012&oldid=3062843"