ML20196L185

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Proprietary & non-proprietary Version of Rev 1 to TR DPC-NE-3004, Mass & Energy Release & Containment Response Methodology, Consisting of Finer Nodalization of Ice Condenser Region.Proprietary Info Withheld
ML20196L185
Person / Time
Site: Catawba, McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/1999
From: Tuckman M
DUKE POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20137R188 List:
References
NUDOCS 9905270158
Download: ML20196L185 (6)


Text

!- *. ,

'\

, j b Duke Energy Corporation f , 526 South Church Street P.O. Box 1006 (EC07H)

Charlotte. NC 28201-1006 M S. kkman' UM)382-2200 OFFICE Executive Vice I+nident VM) 3824360 FAX Nudear Grvemtion May 20, 1999 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D. C. 20555-0001 ATTENTION: Document Control Desk

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station Docket Numbers 50-369 and 50-370 Catawba Nuclear Station Docket Numbers 50-413 and 50-414 Topical Report DPC-NE-3004P, Revision 1 Enclosed for review is' Duke Energy Corporation Topical Report DPC-NE-3004, " Mass and Energy Release and Containment Response Methodology," Revision 1. DPC-NE-3004, Revision 0, was approved by a NRC Safety Evaluation Report dated September 6, 1995.

Revision 1 consists of a finer nodalization of the ice condenser region, which is necessary to support an upcoming technical specification amendment request for McGuire Nuclear Station.

This forthcoming technical specification amendment request will propose non-uniform ice weight requirements by row. This matter was previously discussed in a meeting with the NRC staff on May 14, 1998.

Some of the information in the attachments is considered proprietary. The proprietary information is that which is indicated by the bold brackets shown in Attachment 2. In accordance with 10CFR 2.790, Duke Energy Corporation requests I

that this information be considered proprietary. An affidavit l

supporting this request is included with this letter. A non-proprietary version is also included within as Attachment 1.

. .a g? D f- mm \ )Q D p Y cr

\ [

er 9905270158 990520 PDR ADOCK 05000369 P PDR c L

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I May*20, 1999 l Page 2 If there are any questions or if additional information is needed on this matter, please call J. S. Warren at (704) 382- 1 4986.

k ,)), e' ' -

M. S. Tuckman l

Attachments (2) xc w/Attacment 1:

L. A. Reyes, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth St., SW, suite 23T85 Atlanta, GA 30303 Mr. S. M. Shaeffer NRC Senior Resident Inspector McGuire Nuclear Station Mr. D. J. Roberts NRC Senior Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station xc w/ Attachments 1 and 2:

Mr. F. Rinaldi, Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8 H12 Washington, D. C. 20555-0001 Mr. P. S. Tam, Senior Project Manager Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop O-8 H12 Washington, D. C. 20555-0001

4 .

l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission May*20, 1999 Page 3  ?

AFFIDAVIT l

1' L 1. I am Executive Vice President of Duke Energy Corporation; l and as such have1the responsibility for reviewing

! information sought to be-withheld from public disclosure in L ~ connection with nuclear' power plant licensing; and am authorized on the.part.of said Corporation (Duke) to apply for this' withholding.

l 2. I am making-this affidavit in conformance with the provisions-of 10CFR 2.790 of the regulations of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) and in conjunction with Duke's application for withholding, which accompanies this.

l affidavit. J 1

3. I have knowledge of the criteria used by Duke in L designating information as proprietary or confidential.
4. Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) (4) of 10CFR l 2.790, the following is furnished for consideration by the NRC in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure should be withheld.

(i) The information sought to be withheld from public j disclosure is owned by Duke and has been held in confidence by Duke and its consultants.

(ii) The information is of a type that would customarily be ,

held in confidence by Duke. The information consists j of analysis methodology details, analysis results, j supporting data, and aspects of development programs )

relative to a method of analysis that provides a i l

competitive advantage to Duke.

- V M. S. Tuckman 1 (Continued) i l ,

I

[

7 I , .

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission'

May'20, 1999
Page 4 f

(iii)The information was transmitted to-the NRC in confidence'and under the provisions of 10CFR 2.790, it

'is to be received in confidence by the.NRC.

i I

(iv) The information sought to be protected is not

) available in public to.the best of our knowledge and belief.

(v) The proprietary information sought to be withheld in this submittal.is that which is marked in the proprietary version of the Duke Topical Report DPC-NE-3004, Revision 1, " Mass and Energy Release and Containment Response Methodology." This information enables Duke to simulate the response of an ice condenser containment design to-a high-energy line break inside containment.

l (vi) The proprietary information sought to be withheld from public disclosure has substantial commercial value to Duke.

(a) It allows. Duke to reduce vendor and consultant j expenses associated with supporting the operation and licensing of nuclear' power plants.

(b) Duke intends to sell the information to nuclear utilities, vendors, and consultants for the purpose of supporting the operation and licensing i of nuclear power plants.

(c) The subject information could only be duplicated by competitors at similar expense to that incurred by Duke.

\

M. p I j M. S. Tuckman j i

(Continued) I i

l l

l- i

U. S." Nuclear Regulatory Commission May'20, 1999 Page 5

5. Public disclosure of this information is likely to cause harm to Duke because it would allow competitors in the nuclear industry to benefit from the results of a significant development program without requiring commensurate expense or allowing Duke to recoup a portion of its expenditures or benefit from the sale of the i information.

I 1

1 1

Nb. A -

M. S. Tuckman (Continued)

U. S.' Nuclear Regulatory Commission-May'20,-1999 Page 6 ti M. S'. Tuckman', being duly sworn, states that he'is the person who subscribed his name to the foregoing statement, and that all the matters and facts set forth within are true and correct to the best of his. knowledge.

f ,) . r i M. S". Tuckman', Executive Vice President Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2ON day of Y 4UJ , 1999

/1//2 NotarhP[ic i

My Commission Expires:

dW 22 , 20#/

l 1

4 l

l SEAL l

l