IR 05000413/1988021
| ML20195J552 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 06/15/1988 |
| From: | Conlon T, Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20195J531 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-88-21, 50-414-88-21, NUDOCS 8806290152 | |
| Download: ML20195J552 (14) | |
Text
- _ - - - - _ _ _ _.. _ _,
'
p f;f 0 UNITED STATES 0q'o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p
[
^[
REGl0 Nil
j '-
101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
I e ATL ANTA, GEORGI A 30323
%,
,/
....
Report Nos.:
50-413/88-21 and 50-414/88-21-Licensee:
Duke' Power Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC -28242
,
Docket Nos.:
50-413 and 50-414 License Nos.:
NPF-35 and NPF-52 Facility Name:
Catawba 1 and 2 Inspection Conducted:
May 16-20, 1988 Inspector:-
G8 ]/m u[,
t- /9-fr J. gf Harris Date Signed
.hpproved W h
9 74 fo~/[~SV T. E. Conlon,' Chief Date Signed Plant Systems Section Division of Reactor Safety SUMMARY Scope:
This routine, unannounced insoection was in the areas of seismic monitoring program, Fire Protection / Prevention and followup on previously identified open items.
Results:
In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.
8806290152 880617
'
POR ADOCK 05000413 Q
Drn
p
'
'
i
'
-
.
.
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees M. Brady, NPD/0 erations
- H. Bandes, Anal tical Engineer
- H.
Cote', Comp 1 ance Manager
- T. Crawford, Superintendent Integrated Scheduling
- M, Garrick, Safety Fire Protection
- R Glover, Compliance Engineer
- S. Mode, Safety Coordinator
'
- T. Owen, Station Manager A. Smith, Maintenance IAE
- J. Tallent, Safety-Fire Protection Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen, engineers' o)erators, mechanics, security force members, technicians, and adminis;rative personnel.
NRC Resident Inspectors
- N.
VanDoorn
- M.
Lesser
- Attended exit interview 2.
IndependentInspectionEffort(927061)
The inspector discussed the seismic monitoring program with responsible technicians and engineers, examined seismic monitoring equipment, reviewed procedures for seismic equipment and surveillances performed on seismic equipment.
Seismic Equipment at the site consists of the following instruments:
Triaxial Time - History Accelerographs IMIMT 5070, Remote Sensor A on Containment Based Slab
-
1HIMT 5080, Remote Sensor B Containment Vessel Elevation 619'5"
-
IMIMT 5090, Starter Unit Containment Base Slab
-
Triaxial Peak Accelerographs 1MIMT 5010, Cont 3iament Bui?.,n Elevation 613'8.9" 1'
-
IMIMT 5020, Containment Buildin Elevation 567'2.5"
-
1MIMT 5030. Auxiliary Building levation 543'
-
_ _ _
_ __ ___ __
_ _
.
Triaxial Seismic Switch 1HIMT 5000, Containment Base Slab-
-
Triaxial Response - Spectrura Recorders IMIMT 5040, Containment Base Slab
-
1MIMT 5050, Containment Building Elevation 579'3.5"
-
-1MIMT 5060, Auxiliary Building Elevation 577'
-
Procedures Reviewed Were:
IP/0/8/3341/97, Seismic Monitoring Analor Channel Operational Test, semi-annual channel operation test or Tr axial Time History Accelero-graphs, Triaxial Seismic Switch and Triaxial Response Spectrum Recorder IP/0/8/3341/08, Eighteen month calibration of Triaxial Peak Accelerographs and Triaxial Response Spectrum Recorders IP/0/8/3341/09, Eighteen month calibration of Time History Accelerograhs and Triaxial-Seismic Switch The most recent surveillance records for the above equipment were reviewed. Review of these records and discussions witn responsible engineers indicated that surveillances were being performed in accordance with procedure requirements.
The Operating Base Earthquake (0BE) for Catawba is 0.08g.
This is a conservative valve and is slightly more than one-half the SSE.
The safe Shutdown Earthquake for Catawba is 0.15g.
This is based on four synthetic earthquake records with maximum accelerations of 0.15g.
Within the area examined, it appeared that the FSAR and Technical Specifications for seismic monitoring were being met.
3.
FireProtection/PreventionProgram(64704)
a.
Fire Prevention /Administative Control Procedures The inspector reviewed the following fire / prevention administrative procedures Procedure No.
Title CNS Station Directive 2.12.1, Fire Protection Program and Revision 7 Fire Reporting Procedure CNS Station Directive 2.12.2 Fire Brigade Organization Revision 7 Training and Responsibilities CNS Station Directive 2.12.5, Control of Combustible 4'
Revision 6 Materials I
_ _ _
_
,._
.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
- !.
.
e
,>
.
.
,
,
,
CNS Station Directive 2.12.6, Fire Impairment Reporting Revision 9 CNS Station Directive 2.12.7, Fire Detection and Protection Revision 0 CNS Station Directive 3.3.9,
' Hot Work Procedure Revision 3
-
CNS S0 3.11.1 Houskeeping and Cleanliness Revision 16 Levels in Safety Related Areas
,
Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures meet the NRC guidelines of NUREG-0800, Section 9.5.1, Standard Review Plan -
Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector reviewed the following Fire Protection System Surveillance Procedures
,
Procedure No.
Title IP/0/8/3540/02 DC Emergency Lighting System Periodic Maintenance Testing
'
MP/0/A/7650/66 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump C 2 Cylinder weight
!
PT/0/A/4400/01A Exterior Fire Protection r
Functional Capacity Tests, h Test
'
Fire Pumps A and 8, Eighteen Mont
,
i PT/0/A/4400/01H Fire Door Inspection, Monthly and
-
Weekly
PT/0/A/4400/01M Monthly Visual Inspection of Fire Hose
'
PT/0/A/4400/015 R/ Fire Protection Flow Periodic Test PT/2/A/4450/13A Unit 2 Auxiliary Turbine Driven Feedwater Pump Room Cop System, Annual Test
.
PT/2/A/4450/138 Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room C Weekly Test
!
,
i
L f
-. -
. - _.. - -,-,,,
, _ _, - _, - _. - -,,
,___,.---_-.__,-_,_,,,.
-- ~. - _ _ _ _. _ _ - - -, _ _ _ _, -,
,,
{.
i
'
.
i
,
PT/2/A/4450/130 Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Co2 System, Semi-Annual Test PT/1/A/4450/1 Unit 1 Diesel Generator Co2 Weekly Test PT/0/A/4200/48 Periodic Inspection of Fire Barrier and Related Structures, Six Month and Eighteen Month Inspection PT/0/A/4400/0iK Fire Suppression Valve Operability Check, Annual Inspection PT/0/A/4400/0IE Fire Hydrant Operability Test, Performed Ever Six Months
,
The above survoillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instructions adequately implement 9e surveillance requirements of the plants Fire Protection Technical Specifications.
In addition, these procedures were reviewed to determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practices, NRC fire protection program guidelines, and the guidelines of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire codes.
Based on this review, it appears thEt the above procedures are satisfactory.
c.
Fire Protection System Surveillance Inspections and Tests The inspector reviewed the following surveillance inspection and test records for the dates indicated:
Procedure No Test Records PT/0/A/4400/01A Reviewed Test Performed Eighteen Month Test December 7 to 11, 1987 PT/0/A/4400/01M Reviewed Test Performed Monthly Test September 1987 through April 1988 PT/2/A/4450/13A Reviewed Tests Perfornnd Test Every Eighteen Month November 12-24, 1987 PT/2/A/4450/130 Reviewed Tests Performed
Semi-Annual Test Februar 1987, September 1987 and Mar h 1988
!
, _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
_ _ _ -
c
.
.
-
.
.
The surveillance test record data and testing frequency associated with the above fire protection system surveillance test / inspections were found to be satisfactory with regard to meeting the requirements of the plants Fire Protection Technical Specifications, d.
Fire Protection Audit The most recent audit of the Catawba Nuclear Station Fire Protection Program was reviewed.
This was Audit Number WP-88-23 (CN) which was conducted during the period of February 22, 1988, through March 4, 1988.
This audit identified several fire protection program discrepancies and unresolved items, and recommended several program improvements.
The licensee has either implemented the corrective actions associated with these audit findings or a scheduled date for completion of the corrective actions has been established.
The licensee appears to be taking the appropriate corrective actions on these audit findings.
e.
Fire Brigade (1) The total station fire brigade is composed of approximately 93 personnel from the operation staff.
The onduty shift fire captain is normall an Assistant Shift Supervisor and the remaining fire bri de members are composed of personnel from the operation staf.
The inspector reviewed the on duty shifts for the months of March, A)ril, and May of 1988, to verify that sufficient qualifiec fire brigade personnel were on duty to meet the provisions of the plants fire protection program.
Review of these records indicated that sufficient cualified personnel were onduty to meet the provisions of the p' ants fire protection program.
(2) The inspector reviewed the training and drill records for all fire brigade members of the A, B, C D, and E shifts for 1987 and 1988.
The records reviewed indicated that each of the leaders and brigade members had received an annual medical review, attended the required training and participated in the required number of drills.
The inspector also verified that a fire brigade drill had been conducted quarterly for each shift for 1987 and 1988.
The fire brigade training records were found satisfactory.
(3) Fire Brigade Fire Fighting Strategies The inspector reviewed the following plant fire fighting strategies:
F..
'
.
Strategy Title 1. 4 Unit 1 Turbine Driven CA
'
Pump, Auxiliary Building 531
' Elevation, Room Number 254 i
1.8 1A' Diesel Generator Room, Diesel Generator Building Room 1A 1.13 Unit 1 Electrical Penetration Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 560, Room 370 1.14-Unit 1 Essential Switchgear Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 560, Rooms 372 and 373 1.16 Unit 1 Corridor Auxiliary Building 574 Elevation Rooms 490 and 493 1.18 Unit 1 Electrical Penetration Room, Auy.iliary Building Elevation 577, Room 494
,
1.21-Unit 1 Switchgear Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation
,
594, Room 576 1.22 Control Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 594, Room 583
"
,
2.11 Unit 2 Electrical Penetration Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 560 2.12 Unit 2, Essential Switchgear
'
,
Room, Auxiliary Building i
Elevation 560, Rooms 362 and 363 2.16 Unit 2 Essential Switchgear i
Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 577, Rooms 485 and 486
'
,
k__-
.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
f[-
.
.
.
-
.
7-2.2 Unit 2 A Train Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Auxiliary Building Elevation 543, Room 262 1.1 RHR Pump Rooms, Auxiliary Building-Elevation 522, Rooms 100 to 112 1. 3 Unit 1A Train Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Auxiliary Building Elevation 543, Room 252 1. 7 Auxiliary Building 543 Elevation, Roo is 200 through 248-l 1.15 Auxiliary Building Elevation 560, Fire Area 11 1.12 Unit 1 Battery Room Auxiliary Building Elevation 534, Rooms 350 through 356 Fir - Area 10 Based on this review,ies adequately addressed the fire hazards the inspector determined that the above fire fighting strateg l-in the area, the type of fire extinguishments to be utilized, the direction of an attack, systems in the room / area to be l
managed in order to reduce fire damage,igade duties with regardheat sens in the room / area, and specific fire br to smoke control and salvage.
(4) Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the insaector witnessed an unannounced fire brigade drill.
The drill fire scenario was a fire involving the Boric Acid Transfer Pump Motor 2A located in Room 301 of the Auxiliary Building.
The boric acid transfer pump motor shorted out and was burning along with associated wiring.
Seven fire brigade members and one health physics technician I
arrived on the scene.
The health physics technician notified
'
the fire brigade captain there was no radiological concern.
An the fire initial size-up of the fire condition was made by/2 inch fire brigade captain.
Two fire extinguishers and a 1-1 attack hose line were pulled from the (.abinet but were not used.
The captain told the H.P. technician and a fire brigade member to take a Co fire extinguisher and enter the room.
Two brigade members and he H.P. technician were sent to the 577 elevation o
..
'
.
-
-
-
.
"
>.
and 543 elevation to check for fire extensions.
Two brigade members were sent into the room to relieve the two members in the room.
When the two brigade members came out they advised the captain that no one was in the room and that the fire was out.
The captain told the members in-the room to standby and watch for reflash.
The fire brigade captain and a brigade member entered the rcom to check the extent of the fire damage.
The captain called the control room and informed them that the fire was out.
The search team called the captain and advised him that the 577 and 543 elevations were free of fire extension.
The fire drill was secured and all fire extinguishing. equipment was restored to service.
-The fire brigade utilized proper manual fire fighting methods
-
and reacted to the fire drill scenario in an effective and efficient manner, f.
Plant Tour and Inspection of Fire Protection Equipment (1)
Inspection of Fire Protection Equipment The inspector performed an inspection of the fire brigade equipment, consisting of fire hose, nozzles tools and l
miscellaneous equiament, stored at the fire br'igade equipment response location n the Turbine Building.
A total of 12 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots, helmets, etc.),12 sets of self contained breathing apparatus, and 12 spare air cylinders are stored at the fire brigade equipment response location.
Based on this inspection, the designated fire brigade equipment appeared to be properly maintained and stored in a ready condition.
(2) Outside Fire Protection Walkdown The inspector verified that the fire pump suction intake structure from lake Wyle was inservice and met the requirements of the Technical Specifications.
The three fire pumps were inspected and found to be in service.
The following section control valves in the outside fire protection water supply system and Co, system were inspected and verified to be properly aligned and lbcked in position:
Valve No Function IRYO2 Fire Pump A Discharge Valve IRYO9 Fire Pump C Discharge Valve IRY14 Fire Pump 8 Discharge Valve r
_
_
--_ _ -__
_
_
_
_. _ _.
.
.
y
,
9.
t
..
IRYl8 Main Fire Pump Loop To Exterior Loop Header IRY44 Exterior Fire Loop Past
!
Indicator IRY45 Unit 1 Turbine Building
Supply IRYS6 Fire Hydrant 13 Hose Connection IRY57 Fire Hydrant 13 Hose Connection IRY65 Uni +,2 Turbine Building Supply Post-Indicator IRY66 Exterior Fire Loop Post Indicator IRY67 Unit 2 Turbine Building Supply Post Indicator IRY68 Fire Hydrant 28 Hose Connection IRY69 Fire Hydrant 28 Hose Conncction
IRY72 Fire Hydrant 26 Hose Connection
IRY73 Fire Hydrant 26 Hose
Connection IRY74-Fire Hydrant 25 Hose Connection IRY75 Fire Hydrant 25 Hose Connection IRY103 Main Fire Pump Loop To
Exterior Loop Header IRY119 Fire Hydrant 17 Hose Connection IRY138 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building RF Header Supply Isolation Valve
-
IRY139 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building RF Header Supply Isolation Valve
-
IRY199 Safe Shutdown Facility Supply Sprinkler Isolation
'
IRY200 Safe Shutdown Facility Hose Rack Isolf n l
IRY219 Containmen 4 chanical l
Equipment Building Sprinkler
Isolation Post Indicator
!
IRY220 Containment Mechanical f
'
I Equipment Building Hose
Isolation Indicator
!
IRY236 Fire Hydrant 34 Hose Connection
,
'
IRY237 Fire Hydrant 34 Hose
Connection
'
i
,
,
. _ _
._.
_
~
.
,
't
IRF817 Unit 1 Die:el Generator Co2 Isolation IRF819 Unit 1 Diesel Generator Co.2 Isolation 2RF817 Unit 2 Diesel Generator Co2 Isolation 2RF819 Unit 2 Diesel Generator Cop Isolation The following fire hydrants and fire hydrant equipment houses were inspected Hydrant 12 Hose House 30-0HC Hydrant 13 Hose House 6-OHH Hydrant 17 Hose House 1-OHH hydrant 24 Hose House 2-OHC drant 28 Hose House 5-OHH H drant 30 Hose House 9-OHH H drant 32 Hose House 7-OHCH Hydrant 59 Hose House 3-OHCH The equipment houses contained the minimum equipment requirement of that specified by NFPA-24 Private Fire Service Mains and Their Appurtenances, and/or the FSAR Commitments.
The equipment appeared to be adequately ma.'ntained.
A tour of the exterior of the plant indicated that sufficient clearance was provided between permanent safet buildings and structures and temporary buildings, y-related trailers and other transient combustible materials.
The general housekeeping of the areas adjacent to the permanent plant structures were satisfactory.
(3) Permanent Plant Fire Protection Features Fire Area Description
Unit 2 Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Area
Unit 1 Hotor Driven Auxiliary feedwater Pump Area
Unit 2 Battery Rooms
Unit 1 Battery Rooms
Unit 2 KCW Pump Area
Unit 2 Essential Switchgear Room
Unit 1 Essential Switchgear Room
Unit 1 Train A Shutdown Panel Room
Unit 1 Train 8 Shutdown Panel Room
Unit 1 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Panel L
_ ____ -__ ____ _ __ _ _ _
y x,
'
,
~*
.
The fire / smoke detection system, manual fire fighting equipment l
(i.e., portable extinguishers, hose stations etc. ) and the fire
'
boundary walls, floors and ceiling associated with the above
'
plant areas were inspected and verified to be in service.
,
<
The automatic sprinkler systems installed for Unit 2 KCW pumps and the Co system installed in Unit 1 and Unit 2 motor driven
Auxiliary feedwater Pits were inspected and found to be in service.
Based on this inspection it appears that the fire protection associated with the above plant areas are satisfactorily maintained.
>
L The plant tour also verified the licensee's implementation of the fire arevention administrative procedures.
The control of combustib'es and flarnable materials, liquids and gases, and the general housekeeping were found to be satisfactory in the areas inspected.
(4)
Appendix R ' ire Protection Features
r The inspector visually inssected the fire rated raceway barriers required for compliance w'th Appendix R,Section III.G.2 in the following areac:
Fire Area Description
-
Unit 2 Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room j
Unit 1 Motor Driven
Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room Based on the inspectors observations of the abnve raceway fire barriers enclosures, it eopears that the one hour fire barrier
integrity associated with' the above fire barrier assemblies was being properly maintained.
The inspector made a walkdown of the Appendix R related
'
Sprinkler and Co2 protection in the following plant areas-Fire Area Description
' 2 Unit 2 otor Driven Auxiliary
Feedwater Pumas i
.3 Unit 1 Potor ) riven Auxiliary
'
Feedwater Pumps
Unit 2 KCW pumps
.
_ _ - _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _
_.
._ _ __.
_
_
_ _ _ _ _
_
_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
-
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
.
..
A
,
Bastid c.) this walkaown, the inspector determined that the sprinkler protection provided for the areas identified above provided suificient protection with respect to controlling en exposure fire.
The following eight-hour emergency lighting units were inspected Unit Column Line-Unit / Elevation BB-49 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 560 88-51 Unit
.1. Auxiliary Building 560 8B-54 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 560 88-60 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 550 88-62 Unit 2 Auxiliary Suilding 560 88-63 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 550 88-46 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building ST" 88-31 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building $77 88-65 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 577 88-68 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 577 Within the areas inspected no violations or deviations were identified.
4.
ActiononPrev'ousInspectionFindings(92701and92702)
a (0 pen) IF! (4J3/86-37-02 and 414/86-42-02) conduct 18 month capacity test of fire pump at 100% and 150% of rated volume at 100% and 65% of rated head as stipulated by NFPA-20.
During an inspection conducted by/0/A/4400/01A would be revised tog. Wisem ifcensee stated that Procedure PT incorporate the requirements of NFP-20.
During this inspection the inspector noted that Procedure PT/0/A/4100/01A had not been revised to incorporate the requirements of NFPA-20 During the Exit the licenses indicated the revision would be made and a copy of the revised prnadure would be given to the resident inspector.
This item remains open and will be reviewed during a future inspection.
(Closed) Violaticn (413,414/87-37-01) unqualified personnel assigned to fire brigade duty.
The inspector during a review of onduty shifts for the months of September and October 1987 Nscovered that not all secerity force personnel assi ned fire brigade duty had received requalification training or ph sical examination as required to remain cualified as fire brigade mem ers.
E Corrective sction taken by the licensee to avoid recurrence of this evert included development of a enmputerized program to track
'
training, drills and physical exams of all fire brigade members.
An updated ?fsting of qualified brigade members is being sent to
appropriate supervisors by the safety section.
If a fire brigade
..
.
. -.
.
- _ _ -
.. -,
- _
-.
..-
.
,
.
-
-
I
'
.
,
.-
., -.
3: 4
U~
mecaer is disqualified for medical reasons the employee's supervisor and safety section is iminediately notified by phone by the corporate
'
medical examiner.
If a fire brigade member is disqualified for lack of. training or drills the employee's supervisor is notified immediately by the safety section.
During this inspection this inspector reviewed training, drills and medical records for all fire brigade members.
This review showed that~all current fire brigade members had received proper training, i
participated in the required number of rills and received a physical examination.
5.
Licensee Event Report (LER) (92700)
(Closed) Inoperable Fire Barrier in violation of Technical Specifications due to the installation of a telephone wire through a concrete firewall vhich rendered the firewall inoperable.
Design Engineers were notified and the proper personnel sea!c.1 the penetration within one hour.
During this inspection the inspector verified that the proper corrective actions were taken.
This item is ciosed.
6.
Evit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on May 20, 1988, with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1.
The inspecto'r described the areas inspected anc discussed in detail the inspection results listed below.
Dissenting comments were not received from the licensee.
The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of,the material provided to or reviewed by the inspector during this insoection.
Licensee management was informed that the IFI uiscussed in Paragraph 4 would remain open and that the violation discussed in Paragra3h 4 would be closed.
The inspectnr also. informed the licensee thao the LER discussed in Paragraph 6 would be closed.
t i
.-
.. _..
.
.
.
..
-