IR 05000413/1989022

Insp Repts 50-413/89-22 & 50-414/89-22 on 890723-28.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Fire Protection & Followup on Previously Identified Insp Items

ML20246M522
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	08/22/1989
From:	Harris J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20246M511	List: IR 05000413/1989022 ML20246M506
References
50-413-89-22, 50-414-89-22, NUDOCS 8909070186
Download: ML20246M522 (14)

Text

f;3, M.I.vN?

L.

y>

y-

.,;,

,

t

'

~

'

,

-

n:w, - e t-

.

, s.o

'-

,

.

f;?' y,. ' ' ? Sis l h'

.

o

,

.#

'~('

• dNOED' STET'ES

~

'

"%;

,[4

.

,

INUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISslON ;

.

p $ff,~~"

g

' 101 MARIETTA STHEET, N.W..

g

'ol'

.

. - REGION il,

,

'. dg.

.

JN

' e7 AR ANTA, GEORGIA 30323

'%..

ef

,

..,. g. -

-

_

t

.\\

,

i- (_ h '

'T

'

-

J Rhport Hos;:d50-413/89-22 and 50-414/89-22.

~

,

-

Li6ensee': Duke lPowerfCompany

1422 South: Church Street-Charlotte, NC. 28242

-

g.

.

Docket Nos.:',50-413 and 50 414:.

License Nos.:

NPF.35 and NPF-52

.

Facility,Name: ' Catawba < 1 and!2

'

t

.?

..

%'

.

.g

.

3.,

.

,,

'#.

• I

'

$.s7

' Inspection l Conducted: July?24-28;-1989

..

.

.

m,..

.

- Inspector:

amu _

b i 1,,2 g

?bh[

r j

te: gned sgy ;7f y; ((.T J.'R. Har Ws - ~ g F-

_

' Approved 1b

1. /(

fr

!

1 a 1.

T. Conlon, Chief

.Date Signed.t.,bd

,

W g

d~..

Plant-Systems:Section-Ar, 'j 4, (. ~ ' - # 9m g /

J'

,.

,i v...

.

F.

..,

C[L Engineering Branch

_

- 7"[.[" FD ' f '

.gf

~%

- Division 'of: Reactor'Sefety

_g

%

f.g s A'

C **, y..p q,.

1.

,~i"

. -

U

'

r

>i

?

d,d Of!C,

' :p.. ; 4

,

$ v;

%j f 81'

SUMMARY

,,.

t

,

e g

• ' '

f/ r

. Scope:

M M(

This routine, unannonnet.d' inspr.:c. tion was conducted in the areas of fire #, -

, #jl

,.y r

,

. f 7 0

,

u protection and followup on previously identified inspection items.

.S

'

Results f N [ d ~ ~'

vn r,

c.

In the: areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identified.

During a

this inspection, the licensee-was'very cooperative in providing:the inspector

_

. withtapplicable procedures, and records;. No weakness was identified during this' inspection.

'

,

g9070186e90822 a

ADOCK 05000433 PDC

'

qj O;

'..

_

. _ - _ _

_ - __ _________ _ _

_.

.

9,.

..3

-

<

.

,

pf'

" J..

.b;

'

1-

,

'

I

...

L REPORT DETAILS

,

,

1.

~ Persons. Contacted'

-

Licensee Employees

?,

M.~ Garric,' Safety Fire Protection

• R. Glover, Compliance Manager

..*T. Harral Design. Engineer Site Office

• V.- King,. Regulatory Compliance '

,

' *T. Owen, Staffing Manager

.

• S.' Mode, Safety Coordinator J. Tallent, Safety Fire Protection Other -licenseen employees ' contacted during this inspection. included

, craftsmen, engineers, operators, mechanics, security force ' members,'

,

l-technicians, and administrative personnel.

NRC Resident Inspector'

- * Mark Lesser

- * Attended exit interview

~

-.

+

2.

.FireProtection/PreventionProgram(64704)

a.

- The inspector reviewed the following fire / prevention administrative

,

!-

procedures:

Procedure No.-

Title CNS Station Directive 2.12.1 Fire Protection Program Revision 8 and Reporting Procedure CNS Station Directive 2.12.2 Fire Brigade Organization Revision 7 Training and Responsibilities CNS Station Directive 2.12.5 Control of Combustible Revision 6 Materials CNS Station Directive 2.12.6 Fire Impairment Reporting Revision 9 CNS Station Directive 2.12.7 Fire Detection and Protection Revision 0 CNS Station Directive 3.3.9 Hot Work Procedure Revision 4

_ __ __ __ -__ _

_-_ -_

__-

7s

.

2. :. '

,

,;,

' '

_,,

_

2.

' Procedure No.

Titie

"-

(cont'd)

CNS Station Directive 3.11.1 Housekeeping and Cleanliness-Revision 18-Level'in Safety-Related Areas.

Based on this review, it appears'that' the above procedures' meet the NRCiguidelines - of NUREG-0800 Section 9.5.1,5 Standard Review Plan Fire Protection Program, b..

' Fire Protection Surveillance Procedures The inspector. reviewed the following Fire. Protection System Surveillance Procedures Procedure No.

Title-IP/0/B/3540/02-Perform Monthly Inspection for.DC Emergency Lighting System MP/0/A/7650/66 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump CO, Cylinder Weight

PT/0/A/4400/01 A Exterior Fire. Protection Functional Capability ~ Test-PT/0/A/4400/01 H Fire Door Inspection, Monthly and' Weekly PT/0/A/4400/01 I Annual Maintenance Inspection of Portable Fire - Extin-

'

guishers PT/0/A/4400/01 M Monthly Visual Inspection of.

Fire Hose PT/0/A/4400/01 P Monthly Inspection of Portable Fire Extinguishers PT/0/A/4400/01 W Annual Valve Operability and Water Availability Visual Inspection PT/1A/4400/01 Y Unit 1-Containment Fire l:

Protection Equipment PT/2/A/4400/01 Y Unit 2 Containment Fire Protection Equipment PT/0/A/4400/01 E Fire Hydrant Operability Test (Every Six Months)

W-__-_--__.

_ _ _ - -

- - _ - _ -

.

.

.

'

.

• Title Procedure No.

(cont'd)

PT/0/A/4400/01 K Fire Suppression Valve Operability Check (Annual Inspection)

PT/2/A/4450/13 D Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump System (Semi-Annual Test)

PT/2/A/4450/13 B Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room CO, (Weekly Test)

PT/2/A/4450/13 A Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater CO, Test (Eighteen Month Test)

The above surveillance procedures were reviewed to determine if the various test outlines and inspection instruction adequately implement the surveillance requirements of the plants Fire Protection Technical Specifications.

In addition, these procedures were reviewed to determine if the inspection and test instructions followed general industry fire protection practices, NRC fire protection program guidelines, and the guidelinas of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Fire Codes.

Based on this review, it appears that the above procedures are satisfactory.

Fire Protection System Surveillan;e Inspections and Tests c.

The inspector reviewed the following inspection and test records for the dates indicated:

Procedure No.

Test Records PT/0/A/4400/01A Reviewed Tests Performed Eighteen Month Test January 27-31, 1989 Exterior Fire Protection Functional Capability Test PT/0/A/4400/01M Reviewed Tests Performed Monthly Visual Inspection January, February, March, of Fire Hose Stations April, May, June, and July 1989 MP/0/A/7650/66 Reviewed Tests Perfonned Semi Annually Test of February 27. 1989 and Auxiliary Feedwater C0, June 9, 1989 Cylinder Weight i

.

t j

L __ _ __ _

_ _ _ _.

__ __

_ __

_

_

... _ _

-

-

-

-

"

.

'

.

-

i

.

.

.

'.

..

Procedure No.

Test Records Tcont'd)

IP/0/8/3540/02 Reviewed Tests Performed Monthly Test of Emergency January, February, March, 1.ights April, May, June, and July 1989 PT/0/A/4400/01 Reviewed Tests Performed Annual Maintenance Inspection March 3-11,1989 of Portable Fire Extinguishers Reviewed Tests Performed PT/0/A/4400/0R

.

July 22, 1988, January 30, Semi Annual Level Check of Halon Fire Protection 1989 and July 5,'1989 PT/0/A/4400/0IP Reviewed Inspection Performed Monthly Inspection of January, February, March, Fire Extinguishers April, May, June, and July 1989 PT/0/A/4400/01E Reviewed Tests Performed Fire Hydrant Operability February 83, September 88, Test Performed Every Six Months March 89 and May 10, 1989 PT/1/A/4450/10B Reviewed Weekly Tests Unit 1 Diesel Generator Performed January 1989 -

CO Weekly Test July 1989

PT/0/A/4400/U Reviewed Tests Performed Fire Suppression Valve July 24, 1987, July 23, 1988 Operability Check, Annual and July 22, 1989 Inspection PT/2/A/4450 13B Reviewed Tests Performed

)

Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump November 1988, April 1988, CO, System Semi Annual Test January 1989, and June 1989

'

PT/2/A/4450 13A Unit 2 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Reviewed Tests Performed C0 Test Performed Every November 1987 and November Ei hteen Months 1988 PT/0/A/4400/01/H-Reviewed Weekly Tests Fire Door Inspection Performed June 1, 1989 to Monthly and Weekly July 11, 1989 and Monthly Tests Performed January 1989 to July 1989 i

_____.__.m..__.

_

_

_ - _

_ _.

.-_

_

._ - _ _ -

-

'az

.<

a

-

.

.

.

.

.

X

~5

'

The s' surveillance test ' record data and testing frequency associated:

with the above fire protection. system surveillance inspections were-found to be satisfactory with regard to meetingLthe requirements of-the plants Fire. Protection Technical Specifications.

m

.d.

Fire Protection Audit The most-recent audit of:the Catawba Nuclear Station Fire Protection

- Program was reviewed.

This was Audit Number NP-89-07(N) which was conducted February 20, 1989 through March 6, 1989.

'

The ' audit identified the following Unresolved Items and Recommenda-tions.

Unresolved ' Items Inadequate documentation of repair and retesting emergency

"

lights found inoperable during annual inspections.

An Appendix R Electrical Analysis was not performed on a B Train

~'

Cable located in thel Unit 1

"A" Train Electrical ~ Penetration Room.

Plant conditions.that are not accurately. reflected in the

" Appendix A to Branch Technical Position APCBS9-S.1 Manual."

Recommendations Document Fire watch Log ) reviews more consistently with the

~

"

Station Directive (2.12.7, or revise the station directive to reflect current practice.

Revise Procedure IP/1/A/3890/27A to change the location of Fire.

Damage Control Equipment from "QA Warehouse" to Warehouse #4.

Also a cable number is incorrectly identified in procedure 3XJ2G80

Document reviews of Nuclear Station modifications for 10 CFR.50, Appendix R consideration- (C'vil and Mechanical NSM's only; Electrical reviews are already being documented).

Review of the records indicated that.the licensee had implemented the proper corrective actions associated with these audit findings.

e.

Fire Brigade (1.) The total station fire brigade is composed of approximately 96 personnel from the operations staff.

The on duty shift fire captain is normally an assistant shift supervisor and the remaining fire brigade members are composed of personnel from the operations staff.

_ =

_ _ -

_

c -

'

.

-

..c.

,

. 0;

..

.

• The inspector reviewed the on duty shifts for the months of May, June, and July 1989, to verify that sufficient qualified fire brigade-members were -on duty to meet the provisions of the plants fire protection program.

Review of these records indicated that sufficient qualified personnel were on duty to meet the provisions of the plants fire protection program.

(2) The. inspector reviewed the training and drill records for all fire brigade members of the A, B, C. D and E shifts for 1988 and 1989. The records indicated that each of the leader and brigade members had received an annual medical review, attended the required training and participated in the required. numbers of drills.

The inspector also verified that a fire brigade drill had been conducted quarterly for each shift for 1988 and 1989.

The fire brigade training records were found satisfactory.

(3) Fire Brigade Fire Fighting Strategies The inspector reviewed the following fire fighting strategies Stategy Title 1.5 Unit 1 B-Train Auxiliary Shutdown Panel, Fire Area 34 Auxiliary Building Elevation 543 1.6 Uni + 1 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump P0nel, Fire area 37 Auxiliary Building Elevation 543 Room 251 1.8 Unit 1 A Diesel Generator Room, Fire Area 25, Diesel Generator Room 1A 1.12 Unit 1 Battery Room Fire Area 10, Auxiliary Building Elevation 554 l

Room 250-356 1.13 Unit 1 Electrical penetration Room Auxiliary Building Elevation i

560, Room 370 l

1.16 Unit 1 Corridor, Auxiliary Building 574 Level, Room 490 and 493 1.17 Unit 1 Cable Room Auxiliary Building Elevation 574, Room 491 and 491 A

l 1.21 Unit I Switchgear Auxiliary

{

Buildings Elevation 594, Room 576

l l

_ _

n.,

,

-

..

-

.

~

.

..

.

.

Stategy Title (cont'd)

2.1 Unit 2 CA Pump' Room Auxiliary Building' Elevation 543, Room 260-260A 2.10 Unit 2 Battery Rooms, Auxiliary Building Elevation 560. Room 340 though 346 2.11 Unit 2 Electrical Penetration Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 560, Room 360 2.15 Unit 2 Electrical Penetration Room, Elevation S77, Room 484

-

1.1 RHR pump rooms Auxiliary Building Elevation 522, Rooms 100 to 112 1.3 Unit 1A Train \\uxiliary Shutdown Panel, Auxiliary Building, Elevation 543, Room 252 1.7 Auxiliary Building Elevation 543 Room 200 through 248 1.12 Unit 1 Battery Room, Auxiliary Building Elevation 543, Rooms 350 through 356 Based on this review the inspector determined' that the above fire fighting strategies adequately addressed the fire hazards in the area, the type of fire extinguishants to be utilized, the direction of attack, systems in the room / area to be managed in order to reduce fire damage, heat sensitive equipment in the room area to be managed in order to reduce fire damage, heat

'

sensitive equipment in the room area and specific fire brigade duties with regard to smoke control and salvage.

(4) Fire Brigade Drill During this inspection, the inspector witnessed an unannounced fire brigade drill. The drill scenario was a fire in the Unit 1 Electrical penetration Room on the 577 elevation.

Station personnel were notified of the drill via the public address system.

The fire brigade leader arrived on the scene and was given scenario message II.

He then established communications with the control room by giving a brief report to existing conditions. Also he established an active command.

W-

_-. -

_

_ _ - -

-. _,

_ - - - - - - _ -

- - _ _

__

_. - - _ - _ - - _ _

_. _ - _ _ _

p;

-

.

--?

' 4.'

,.

- - -

.

,

,

>

-..-

,

N

.

8:

The Fire Brigade leader confirmed with the Control Room that-1 ETA-12 was deenergized.

"

Five Fire Brigade members' arrived at the scene' with proper ;

protective clothing and -SCBA.

They were briefed on the. fire conditions and ~ given assignments by the Fire Brigade Leader..

! 0ne security officer with the; emergency keys' arrived on the

-

scene and two MERT-members arrived.

The Fire Brigade members

~ initiated a. primary search for. a possible victim.. The three other members pulled 75 feet of 11/2 inch hose to extinguish the fire. The fire was declared under control by the. evaluator,

-

.the primary search continued.

A Health Physics. Technician

arrived and began radiological. monitoring.

The search team located one unconscious victim..Using a proper'

rescue they egressed the fire area and turned.the victim over to.-

-the awaiting MERT_ Team.

The firei. was completely extinguished. The Fire' Brigade leader asked' that the detectors be-reset and that the ventilation

.;

system be : restored.

A secondary search was initiated by 'the five fire brigade members. _ The secondary search was completed and an all clear was reported to the Fire Brigade-leader.

The Fire Brigade utilized proper manual fire fighting raethods

'and reacted - to the fire drill scenario in. a effective and efficient manner.

- F.

Plant Tour and Inspection of Fire Protection Equipment The inspector performed an inspection of-the fire brigade equipment consisting of fire ~ hoses, nozzles, tools and miscellaneous equipment stored at the fire brigade equipment response location in the turbine

' building.

A total of 12 sets of turnout gear (coats, boots, helments) 4 set of self. contained breathing apparatus and 6 sets of air cylinders and 5 spare sets of air cylinders are stored at the fire brigade equipment response location.

Based on this inspection the designated fire brigade equipment appeared to be properly maintained and stored in.a ready condition.

(1) Outside Fire Prctection Walkdown

[

The inspector verified that the fire pump suction intake structure from Lake Wyle was inservice and mat the requirements of the Technical Specifications.

The three fire pumps were inspected.

Pumps B and C were inservice, however pump A was not in service and is being repaired.

L'

._

_-_

-

_

. - _

-

l-; :..

l;

...

,

-

...

.

-

...

l:

• The following section control valves in the outsides fire protection water supply system and C0, system were-inspected and verified to be properly aligned and locked in position.

Valve No.

Function.

IRYO9 Fire Pump C Discharge Valve IRX14 Fire Pump B Discharge Valve IRYl8 Main Fire Pump Loop to Exterior Loop Header 1RX44 Exterior Fire Loop Post Indicator 1RX45 Unit 1 Turbine Building Supply 1RYS6 Fire Hydrant 13 Hose Connection 1RY57 Fire Hydrant 13 Hose Connection IRY65 Unit 2 Turbine Building Supply Post Indicator 1RY66 Exterior Fire Loop Post Indicator 1RY67 Unit 2 Turbine Building Supply Post Indicator 1RY68 Fire Hydrant 28 Hose Connection IRY69 Fire Hydrant 28 Hose. Connection IRY72 Fire Hydrant 26 Hose Connection 1RY73 Fire Hydrant 26 Hose Connection IRY74 Fire Hydrant 25 Hose Connection IRY119 Fire Hydrant 17 Hoce Connection 1RY138 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building RF Header Supply Isolation Valve IRY139 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building RF Header Supply Isolation Valve IRY139 Safe Shutdown Facility Supply Sprinkler Isolation IRY200 SafeShutdown Facil'ty Hose pack

.

Is01ation

. _ _ _

- __

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

,

.- _

- - _ - - - - - - - -. - - - - - _ - - - - - _ _. - _ _ _ _ _

..

,

-

.

.

-

'.

-

-,.

-.

'

.

Valve No.

Function (cont'd)

1RY219 Containment Mechanical Equipment Building Sprinkler 1RY200 Containment Mechanical Equipment Building Hose Isolation Indicator 1RY236 Fire Hydrant 34 Hose Connection 1RY237 Fire Hydrant 34 Hose Connection IRF817 Unit 1 Diesel Generator CO, Isolation IRF819 Unit 2 Diesel Generator CO2 Isolation The following fire hydrants and fire hydrant equipment houses were inspected.

Hydrant 12 Hose House 30 HC Hydrant 13 Hose House 60 HH Hydrant 17 Hose House 1-0HH Hydrant 24 Hose House 2-OHC Hydrant 28 Hose House 5-OHH Hydrant 30 Hose House 9-0HH Hydrant 32 Hose House 7-OHCH Hydrant 59 Hose House 3-0HCH Hydrant 113 Hose House 8-OHC Hydrant 253 Hose House 17-0HC Hydrant 250 Hose House 16-OHC The equipment houses contained the minimum equipment requirement of that specified by NFPA-24 Private Fire Service Mains and their Appurtenances, and/or the FSAR Commitments. The equipment appeared to be adequately maintained.

A tour of the exterior-of the plant indicated that sufficient clearance was provided between permanent safety-related buildings and structures and temporary buildings trailers and other transient combustible materials. The general housekeeping of the areas adjacent to the permanent plant structures were satisfactory

_

_ - _ _

-

_.

-

__ -

W ' l.,

'

'

~

[

..,

':

l~'

,.

-

}

.(3) : Permanent Plant Fire Protection Features

'

"

Fire Area Description

,

2:

' Unit. 2 motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Area..

Unit 1 Motor Driven Auxiliary.

Feedwater Pump Area-9 Unit 2 Battery Rooms

Unit 1 Battery Room

'14 Unit 2 Essential Switchgear Room 15-

' Unit 1 Essential Switchgear Room 32~

Unit 1 Train A $hutdown Panel Room

Uriit'l Train B Shutdown' Panel Room.

Unit 1 Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Panel

2B Motor Driven Feedwater Pump Panel

Unit 1 Battery Room

Unit 1 Cable Spreading Room

Unit 2 Cable Sp. reading Room

Unit l' Diesel

Unit 2 Diesel The fire / smoke detection systems, manual fire fighting equipment'

(i.e portable extinguishers, hose stations etc.) and the fire boundary walls, floors and ceiling associated with the-above plant areas were inspected and verified to be inservice.

The automatic sprinkler systems installed for the Unit 2KC pumps and the CO, system installed in Unit 1 and Unit 2 motor driven Auxiliary' Feedwater pits were inspected and found to.. be in service.

Based on this inspection it appears that the fire protection associated with the above areas are satisfactorily maintained.

-

_=

_

-

- _

__

_

__

__

J

~

~

~

~

~

~-

---

~

.; w

'

,

,

l.

' '

.

..

.. ~ '. -

-

.

The plant-tour also verified the licensee's implementation'of

-

the fire ~ prevention administrative procedures.. The control of.

combustibles.and flammable materials, liquids.and gases,-and the

'

= genera 1' housekeeping were found to be~ satisfactory in the areas

'

inspected..

~

(4); Appendix R Fire Protection Features The-inspector visually inspected the f. ire rated raceway barriers required for compliance with Appendix R,1111 G. 2 in the-following areas:

Fire Areas Description

,

2-Unit 2 motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room

'5 Unit 1 Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Room.

Based

on the inspectcrs observat:1ons of -the f bove raceway fire barriers enclosures, it appeer, that the one heur' fire barrier integrity hssociated with the above fire barrier assemblies was being properly maintained.

The-inspector made a walkdown of the Appendix R related Sprinkler and CO, systems in the following plant areas:

Fire Areas Description

Unit 2 Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps

Unit 1 Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps

Unit 2 KCW pumps Based on this walkdown the inspector determined that the sprinkler protection provided for the areas identified above provided sufficient protection with respect to controlling an exposure fire.

The following eight-hour emergency lighting units were inspected.

Unit Column Line Unit / Elevation AA-49 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 577 AA-50 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 577

=_=__

-_

.

_ _ _ _ _ -

. _

__

-

_-.

-

- - _

_

'*

t

.,, -

..

,

-

.

,

l

• I

~

,

,

13 i

I Unit Column Line Unit / Elevation (cont'd)

AA-65 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 577 AA-67-Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 577 AA-46 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 560 AA-49 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 560 AA-51 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 560 AA-54 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 560 AA-60 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 560 AA-62 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 560 BB-63 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 594 BB-65 Unit 2 Auxiliary Building 577 BB-67 Unit 1 Auxiliary Building 594 Inspection of the above emergency lights indicated they were properly aligned and being proferly maintained.

4.

Action on Previous Inspection Findings (92702)

a.

(0pon) Deviation 413/89-16-03 Shutoff Head Testing of Fire Pumps.

m ihe RY piping is designed to 150 psig with a relief valve to protect it. Testing at shutof f hcad pressure (220 psig) will lift the relief and place the piping system at risk. There are no minimum flow lines.

In in a letter from H. D. Brandes to F. Wyke dated August 15, 1988 test acceptanen criteria for the RY pumps is specified.

In lieu of testing at shutoff head a test point of 1000 gpm is specified to meet the minimum flow requirements.

This, however, has not been incorporated into the licensee's test procedures, This is ident':fied as a deviation of the licensee's commitment to NFPA Code 20. This item remains open until'an adequate response is received from the licensee.

5.

Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on July 28, 1989, with

'

those persons indicated in paragraph 1..The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detail the inspection results.

The licensee did not identify as proprietary any of the material provided or reviewed by the inspector during this inspection.

!

l i

l

-____--_---__-________O