ML20141E555

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:13, 26 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Page 10 of Rev 1 of PI-MP3-05,omitted from 970428 Submittal. W/Nrc Conflict of Interest Statements & Resumes
ML20141E555
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/16/1997
From:
SARGENT & LUNDY, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML20141E462 List:
References
PI-MP3-05-01, PI-MP3-5-1, NUDOCS 9705210038
Download: ML20141E555 (28)


Text

~

1 s 5 x1 48 PROJECT INSTRUCTION -f"~ INSTRUCTION PI-MP3-05 REV.1 5.4.3 The Walkdown Team shall review the document changes contained in the modif t.ation package versus the redline drawings prepared as part of the nystem walkdown (Subsection 5.3 of this project instruction). Dis repancies shall be noted on the Modification Walkdown Checklist (CK-MP3-05-04).

5.4.4 The Lead Verifior shall identify key critical dimensions that will be checked by the Walkdown Team. The Lead Verifier shall note these key critical dimensions on the Modification Walkdown ,

Checklist (CK-MP3-05-04). Key critical dimensions may include analytical / calculation bases, specific dimensional limits and requirements stated on the drawings which deviate from the 4

standard installation tolerances, etc.

5.4.5 The Walkdown Team shall perform a walkdown of the modified area to verify installation is in accordance with the modification package. This step includes checking critical dimensional data

included in the modification package. Any discrepancies shall be noted on the Modification Walkdown Checklist (CK-MP3-05-04).

5.4.6 Upon completion of the walkdown, the Walkdown Team shall sign and date the completed Modification Walkdown Checklists (CK-

. MP3-05-04) and shall generate a Discrepancy Report per l Subsection 5.6 for any discrepant conditions identified during the walkdown.

1 5.4.7 The Lead Verifier shall review the completed Modification I Walkdown Checklists (CK-MP3-05-04) for completeness and shall  !

signify his concurrence by signing and dating the checklist. l l

5.4.8 The Lead Verifier shallindicate completion of the modification J walkdown on the Walkdown Control Checklist (CK-MP3-05-01) and shall initial and date the entry. I 5.5 Walkdown Documentation Packaae Assembly 5.5.1 The Lead Verifier shall assemble a documentation package consisting of the following:

. . Reference Drawings

. Redline Drawings i CK-MP3-05 Series Checklists 9705210038 97o516 l PDR ADOCK 05000423 P

, _PDR Page 10 of 11 l

y . . . - _. _ _ _ -__ _ _ __._ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .. . _ _ _ . _

b z

ROBERT A. HAMEETMAN i Mechanical Pmject Engineering Division Associate and Pmject Manager 1

I j EDUCATION EXPERIENCE ,

4-h University of Illinoh. B.S.A.A.E. 1973 Mr. Hameetman has over 21 years of ,

experience in the mechanical engineering and  ;

4

lilinois Institute of Technology - Post Graduate design of major steam-electric generating  !

Courses in Mechanical Engineering - stations. He has served as a mechanical project j j

1973 to 1977 engineer for Comed's Zion nuclear power station, where he also has functioned as both a i mechanical and a field engineer. He has been REGISTRATIONS responsible for plant modifications, equipment Professional Engineer illmu6, Wsconsin procurement, and system reviews. Modification >

[ ' work involved radwaste, fire protection, and

- Appointed Associate - 1988 ,

Three Mile Island modifications, and included

' PROFICIENCIES interface between the client and Sargent &  !

Lundy on other modification work. Mr. s Project management Hameetman also has been a mechanical-Mechanical engineering engineer for Comed's Byron nuclear station.

Construction specifications He was directly responsible for system designs i

Equipment procurement specifications for the condensate, condensate booster and Bid Evaluations auxiliary building drain systems in addition to  ;

j Fluid System Analysis involvement in other mechanical systems.  ;

Design Criteria _ System design included pipe and equipment ,

sizing, material compatibility, fluid system l RESPONSIBILITIES analysis and comparison of the Byron system to  ;

j the Zion system design. He was' involved in l As a project manager, Mr. Hamcetman is preparation of specifications, vendor interface l responsible '.or the planning, coordination, and and bid evaluations for the miscellaneous small

, performance monitoring of Sargent & Lundy's pumps, shop-fabricated tanks, containment fluid  ;

project activities. He leads the project head penetrations and gallery work. He was enginecting stafi m the .overall engineering effort also responsible for incorporation of Zion l and in the preparation cf such management (reference plant) modifications into the  !

! documents as the engineering schedules, the Byron /Braidwood design..

project cost estimate, and the project scope of work. Mr. Hameetman controls Sargent & Before assuming these responsibilities,

. Lundy's project engineering man-hour Mr. Hameetman was an engineering analyst in expenditures by regularly monitoring expended Sargent & Lundy's Engineering Mechanics i- ' man-hours versus projected man-hour estimates. Division. He performed piping stress analyses J L He advises the client regarding the project's on four nuclear. and two fossil-fueled stations.

j: status in the monthly progress reports during He joined Sargent & Lundy in 1973. His review meetings and in his day-to-day experience includes assignments in the capacity communications with the citent. By virtue of his noted for the following projects:

position, he has the authority to call upon the resources of the firm to meet the demands' of L ' the project.

Page 1

-45064 -

3032295-i

ROBERT A. HAMEETMAN Mechanical Project Engineering Division Associate and Project Manager NUCLEAR PLANT DESIGN Mechanical Engineer. Miscellaneous  ;

modification ivork. (1975 to 1980)

= CnmEd

- Braidwood 1 and 2,1175 MW each; Field Engineer. Interface with Zion and

- Byron 1 and 2,1175 MW each. Sargent & Lundy. (1974 to 1975)

Mechanical Engineer. (1975 to 1980)

Engineering Analyst (field). Piping

- LaSalle I and 2, nuclear,1122 MW analysis. (1973) -

each.

Engineering Analyst. (1973) = The Detroit Edison Company

- Fermi 2, nuclear,1123 MW.

= The Detroit Edison Company Independent review of 35 modification

- Enrico Fermi 2,1123 MW. packages resulting from turbine blade Engineering Analyst. (1974) failure outage. (1994) ,

= Public Service Company of Colorado = Virginia Power

- Fort St. Vrain 1,330 MW. - Surry 2, nuclear,775 MW; Engineering Analyst. (1973 to 1974) - North Anna 1 and 2, nuclear,890 MW .

each.

FOSSIL PLANT DESIGN Lead Project Engineer. Preparation of i design change packages for installation

> a American Electric Power Service - of reactor vessel level indicator system Corporation / Buckeye Power, Inc. modifications. (1981 to 1982)

- Cardinal 3, coal, 615 MW.

Engineering Analyst. (1973) MEMBERSHIPS

= Central Louisiana Electric Company American Nuclear Society

- Rodemacher 2; coal, lignite, oil, and gas; Associate Member of Amencan Society of i 511 MW. Mechanical Engineers Engineering Analyst. (1973) i PUBtlCATION BETTERMENT l "Using Advanced Computer Technology to l

= Comed Consolidate Project information," 55th annual l

. Zion 1 and 2, nuclecr,1085 MW each. meeting of the American Power Conference, l Project Manager. Miscellaneous 1993  !

modification work. (1982 to present) I Lead Project Engineer Miscellaneous l modification work. (1982)

Mechanical Project Engineer.

Miscellaneous modification work. (1980  !

to 1982) l Page 2

-45066 032293

i 1

l JAMES E. DOMBROWSKI instmmentation & Contmls Pmject Engineering Disision Pmiect Engineer CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY DESIGN BASIS DOCUMENT PROJECT SUPPORT

~

= Systems design experience with NSSS, BOP, and radwaste systems.

  • Electrical systems interconnection, including wiring and physical design experience.
  • Preparation of nuclear plant engineering deliverables, including design criteria and safety analysis reports.

EDUCATION piping and instrumentation diagrams / control and instrumentation diagrams, loop, logic, and Southern Illinois University B.S. Electrical schematic diagrams, instrument piping and Engineering Technology - 1974 mounting details, and instrument data sheets; revision of computer databases documenting the PROFICIENCIES modifications for reference; supervising assigned engineers; monitoring project progress for Systems design adherence to scope of work, schedule, and cost Preparation of piping and instrumentation effectiveness.

diagrams Development of logic diagrams - EXPERIENCE i Procurement of instrumentation and control (l&C) Mr. Dombrowski has performed and provided Layout of control panels and instrument racks supervision and techn: cal support at increasing ,

levels of responsibility at Sargent & Lundy since ,

RESPONSIBillTIES 1974 for design modification and startup support for nuclear generating stations. His Mr. Dombrowski is responsible for the most recent assignment to Commonwealth management of projects and engineering Edison Company's Dresden and Quad Cities i

activities . elated to l&C network development of stations included an environmental monitoring liquid and gaseous process systems for boiling project for assessing thermal river pollution, water reactor nuclear generating stations. As replacement of the inerted primary containment part of his responsibilities, he performs or oxygen verification network, corrosion reduction l delegates tasks as required to be performed on of primary coolant piping through hydrogen these projects. These tasks include preparation injection, and IA and SBGTS upgrades.

of design criteria and safety analysis reports:

i general arrangement of control, auxiliary, and Mr. Dombrowski has experience in the computer rooms; general arrangement of engineering, procurement, and design of remote and local control panels: development of instrumentation and control for six power modification design packages which includes nuclear generating stations. His engineering l

project plans, engineering checklists for experience has included main control room modification testing, system interaction, and panel layout, radwaste systems, balanceof-plant 10 CFR 50.59 reviews; preparation of systems, and nuclear steam supply systems. He engineering change notices which includes has also been involved in the preparation of Page1 r

-- 24171.A 8/94 i

i JAMES E. DOMBROWSKI l Instrumentation & Controls Project Engineering Division l Project Engineer i piping and instrumentation diagrams, data - Dresden 2 and 3/ Quad Cities 1 and 2, sheets, and design criteria and in the nuclear,850 MW each. l development of logic diagrams. Main steam isolation valve closure l Mr. Dombrowski has also been responsible for enhancement study for air delivery 1 procurement specification preparation, design system. (1988) l coordination with other disciplines, review of vendor supplied equipment and documentation, - LaSalle 1 and 2, nuclear,1122 MW  !

project quality control, modifications to a each.  ;

computer-based data acquisition system, and Human engineering deficiencies. (1988) supervision of staff er gineers and technicians in applications for a variety of power generation

  • Illinois Power projects. - Clinton, nuclear 985 MW.

Safety and non4afety-related l In addition to his design experience, modifications. (1985 to 1986) l Mr. Dombrowski has approximately five years of l&C field experience including troubleshooting,

  • The Detroit Edison Company modifications, and major retrofits. He has also - Fermi 2, nuclear,1123 MW.

been involved in Appendix R and human Safety and non-safety-related engineering deficiencies reviews and instrument modifications. (1981 to 1982) data gathering walkdowns. .

FIELD 1 His experience includes the following projects: -- l

. Commonwealth Edison Company PLANT BETTERMENT - Braidwood 1 and 2, nuclear,1175 MW each.

l

  • Commonwealth Edison Company troubleshooting, modifications, and j

- Dresden 2 and 3, nuclear,850 MW retrofits. (1987 to 1988) J each.  !

River water, intake, and discharge canal -

Quad Cities 1 and 2, nuclear,850 MW i monitoring. (1992) each.

Instrument data gathering walkdown.  ;

Primary containment oxygen verification. (1988) 1 (1991) a filinois Power Hydrogen addition and main control - Clinton, nuclear 985 MW.

room retrofit. (1989) Loaned servant. (1987) l Condensate resin transfer and Modifications and major upgrades. (1986 regeneration system design study. to 1987)

(1988)

Appendix R review and walkdown. ,

let pump instrumentation and 1984) l demineralizer regeneration upgrades. l (1988) Design of data acquisition inputs for j start 41p transient analysis system. (1983) l 1

Page 2 2417-i.A 8/94

JAMES E. DOMBROWSKI instmmentation & Contmls Pmiect Engineering Division Pmject Engineer PLANT DESIGN

  • lilinois Power

- Clinton, nuclear,985 MW.

Initial design, system instrumentation, and proctrement for steam generation related processes. (1977 to 1981,1982

.to 1985) .

Design and procurement of local instrument racks. (1979 to 1981)

Wiring design. (1975 to 1977)

Electrical physical design. (1974 to 1975)

P T

P Page 3 24171 A 8/94

m-' - --

.* s a.- .Aimi m. a . . - _ .

_ 4 s.+ -.. 4 4 -)

, k_cs_ ia _m.w. .cEv_ r .&. u.my e.n c.ou _. _ ; - a.n o . . : 1.: : u u. t.

T in s u, o n_:m. ..wct :s t. 4

__ 1..t. xtn. .:.o_u ERIN Engineering and Research. Inc.

Warren h,. Pinner a-,2 .... - ....~..... ..

gi;;@.

n=== a 3Lg .. ~...m . . -~._.

a= ==ppgntag gfyg g gi= w newEk we= =========e====

- - ~-mu rn-  :==

u:MiPfa:n:@itaamm=ww4=:::ee:==n=~:m.r; ww.~ .a.a.r. re:=er:q;:su s LeadSen/orEn# eer .a. m.

_.,erwe.. enee_um._

.mw .

,.i.7:MI.'

m :=

21..

. .. .m.....-. y . ..,, _ , . _,

b **1*" M*T: II".*.**.*N.'7.

u b. ... . . - . . 4;:. n.

= e .:r:==::=r:u = = :.gg= m:=r

. .. .. . . -. .~ . - . y; , m. o.==,=."m

= = ,-p.

m:g.=k=e:p::rm:m un. = muur:

. . :: mn:==== ma  ::%==.uuu:.: .=:.:::

n:= ==-.mn=hu=e:=:.wm=ax=.

.=-

.n_ -

wnn.w=

u: m. a:.. .r. :==

h=r u  :::::=: .==rp=en:.  ::r:==

c::

an==:::=:u  : = ra e=Lgh=ur m .ne :.q::gp

n..m==g;=r.:: m=

u=r:a:

=,=;2=xe

=_ _ .=. _ _=. t:nn==:=.a.

.m_.g u.=m . ==. = =._. r.==m_.=.

=

_ =m.,

. .. :w.=._ . : .m.w.

, . . _. .=. . .. n. . . . . . .. = ..

AREAS OFEXPERTISE WORKEXPERIENCE o

Emmineerion Conamitant (1994 - 1996) a

  • Nudent Quatery Assurnace
  • MalninnaneeEnginonving WW # "#

maintenance management, managesuent assessenents, quality

  • MellaMiery CanenrodMalatenance assurance. training and maimenance engineering suppon. '

{

, , PECO Encemv Cmm=== v (1970 - 1994)

Nweleer Qwality Aamurane (NQA) L. cad Aadtt:r U 993 to 1994) .

CW requirements for Lead Audhor Cenificadon. Pctformod audits is the ibliowing areas: Maintenanoe. Fuel Handling and in.

Vesse1 Material, Materials Management. Procurernent Process, Safety l

Related Sanware Conal, Fire Protection and ISI/NDE Programs.

18 eve 40 patent and Supeevision of Materials Management Branch (1990 to 1993) - Worked with Peach Bottom, Limerick, and other nuclear tactuues in contacung Materials Management Supertatendenu, Procurement Engineering Groups and Storeroom personnel to successfbily develop the size, requirements and  ;

responsibiuties o(a corporate Material Management Branch,  ;

including the successful implementation of the computenzed Materials Management Module PECO's Fooled Inventory Management Representatne (1990 to 1994) participated as the Management Committee Representative.

Equipment Commhtee member in the nationside Pooled Inventory 4

Management organization.

Development and Supersision of the Reliability Centered Maintenance Group (1988 to 1990) . P auarched and developed the charter, sta#, and philosophy for the stew "RCM" group. Sucocesfully revised the Pmentatave Maimenance Program at both Peach Bottom and Limerick based on the RCM system evalualsons cornpleted by this group ENPO Peer Evalutor (1988) Trained as a maintenance peer I evaluator at INPO's Atlama Omcc. Participated at an !NPO I maintenance peer evahuror at the River Bend Nuclear Station in Baton Fouge. Loutstana

,' . dO. H) UM.kkHY! h. lJ.h DY. 21G4"1 n i -2p-;G . 1 1. 23 V1, _ .

713 -194 E%nh

. . dRptb.T g it,\ui:y ,3 )

1 ERIN Engineering and Re. search, hw.

Warren E* Pinner '*********"*""'**'********'"**'"'"D

. Supenised and was respons6te for all maintenance technical personnel and crett support at Peach Bottoni from 1983 to 1987 N' # -

Includes wating or rmising all Peach Bottom Mainsenance Prccedarcs. .

1 Usserick Limit 1. Test Beview Board (1952 ta 1983)- Sernd on the i EDUCATION tin ,ick Unit i Test ateview Board to venry e ch eystern was  ;

techax: ally correct, tested and documented prior to transfer fkom '

8.5 Eaarhedrhis Md'"*r U84'er8ity Bechtel to PECO ovactship.

Eddysteme Malmae===rw Enginecting Group (1900 to 1982) - i Participated in and wa: mponsible for P.nvironrnental, Boller, Turbinc and Maintenance Support pro) cts at Eddystone Geacraung Station.

LICENSE & REGISTRATIONS / Barbadoes and Steam Heat Dept. (1573 to 1980) - Participated in PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES and was responsible for operations test enginecibig and instrument and control duties at various PECO fossil fuel sites.

]

Eminente(ASNQ liercules Inc. (1965 - 19701 l' the Anaerican NucteerSociety(ANS)

Verified the quahty of vanous chemical products using both wet lab The Ameerleen Society e/Qwality Costal and instrument lab techniques.

(ASQC) t t

. -- - - -. . - ~ - . -. .~ . . -

d 4-V Ji.

sargene g Lunctym JACK F. WAKELAND

~

7 Power Systems Engineering Division Senior Engineer J

EDUCATION Mr. Wakeland has also written, coordinated, and performed thermal tests of diesel generator Purdue University M.S. Mechanical Jacket water coolers and safety-related room Engineering 1988 coolers as part of an assignment to Commonwealth Edison Company's (Comed)

Rose.Hulman Institute of Technology - B.S. Dresden Station technical staff. He has written i Mechanical Engineering - 1982 thermal test procedures for residual heat removal heat exchangers and component PROFICIENCIES cooling heat exchangers. He has performed a number of thermal analyses to predict off-normal Heat exchanger analysis performance or to evaluate thermal test data for Performance testing diesel generator coolers, component cooling  !

Hydraulic systems modeling heat exchangers, residual heat removal heat Boiling water reactor (BWR) systems exchangers, and spent fuel pool heat l

Pumps and heat exchangers exchangers.

a RESPONSIBILITIES Mr. Wakeland has also developed hydraulic >

models for safety and non-safety-related service Mr. Wakeland performs design and analytical water systems. For some of these models, he studies for thermal and hydraulic aspects of developed hydraulic tests and benchmarked the power plant systems and components. He models with the test results. At the Comed Zion ,

performs heat exchanger thermal analyses and station site, he developed a plan for major hydraulic network flow balances. He develops service water system repairs and modifications, performance testing procedures for heat including plans for a temporary service water ,

exchangers and coolmg water networks, system that would allow the removal of supply conducts testing, and evaluates test data. He mains from service for replacement of leaking sizes lines for liquid, vapor, and two-phase flows. isolation valves. Mr. Wakeland has Mr. Wakeland also develops system design basis reconstructed the design bases for the service documents and determines system design water systems of older nuclear stations. His pressures and temperatures. In addition, he experience in hydraulic work is not limited to develops abnormal hydraulic system alignments senice water systems: he has also performed for accident or outage / repair conditions. hydraulic evaluations for auxikary feedwater, containment spray, reactor core isolation EXPERIENCE cooling, low-pressure coolart injection, steam generator blowdown, circulating water, and fire Mr. Wakeland has recently worked on an protection systems at a variety of nuclear evaluation of the impact on spent fuel pool stations.

. cooling of removing component cooling water ,

heat exchangers from service for the Mr. Wakeland has performed system design replacement of senice water valves at basis reviews at Wisconsin Electric's Point Beach

~ Consumers Power Company's Palisades Station. and Consumers Power's Palisades sites.

This work included identificanon of tube replacement and tube sleeving services for Prior to joining Sargent & Lundy, Mr. Wakeland repairing damaged component cooling water worked one year for General Dynamics, a heat exchanger tubes dunng these isolations. nuclear submanne shipyard, und two years for Page 1 It944 9 -

'060695

+

4 sar gens A Lundy"a JACK F. WAKELAND

[ Power Systems Engineering Division Semor Engineer -

. l filinois Power during construction of their water, lubricating oil, and intercooler

. Clinton station. Mr. Wakeland's responsibilities water coolers during design basis  !

while with the shipyard included developing conditions. (1994) ,

specifications for propulsion plant pumps and '

heat exchangers. His responsibilities for the = The Cleveland Electric illuminating utility included resolving safety and licensing Company J

concerns, managing technical studies, and - Perry 1, nuclear,1140 MW.

coordinating activities for one of the plant's Evaluated replacement of buried balance-emergency facilities. This experience has given of-plant service water piping. (1994)

Mr.Wakeland a broad exposure to the design and system functions of a General Electric

  • Wisconsin Electric BWR 6 plant. - Point Beach 1 and 2, nuclear, 485 MW each.

His specific experience includes: Validated design basis document for reactor coolant system as part of a site NUCLEAR EXPERIENCE assignment. (1994)  ;

a Consumers Power Company

  • Commonwealth Edison Company

- Palisades,812 MW. - Dresden 2 and 3,830 MW each.

identified tube replacement and s!eeving Drafted hydraulic test procedures for methods for repair of damaged comprehensive balance-of-plant service ,

component cooling water heat - water system as part of a site exchanger tubes as part of a site assignment. (1994) ,

assignment. (1995)

Developed hydraulic model of balance-Developed installation sequence for new of-plant service water system. (1994)  :

service water valves on the inlet and outlet of the component cooling water Evaluated operability of diesel generator heat exchanger as part of a site for reduced cooling water flow to jacket >

assignment. (1995) water cooler as part of a site assignment.

(1994)

Evaluated impact on spent fuel cooling of isolating one or both component Wrote test procedure for thermal cooling water heat exchangers for performance test of containment cooling ,

installation of new service water valves heat exchanger while assigned to station as part of a site assignment. (1995) technical staff. (1994))

Reviewed design basis of serv ce water Helped technical staff perform local leak f system. (1993) rate tests for containment isolation valve technical specification surveillance.

  • Detroit Edison Company '1994)

- fermi 2, nuclear,1095 MW.

Evaluated hydrauhc performance of Wrote test procedure for alternate rod diesel generator service water system msertion SCRAM timing test while and thermal perrormance of jacket assigned to station technical statf. ,

4 I Page 2 H944-9 06069s.  ;

{

saroaek iik 1.unciv " JACK F. WAKELAND.

/ Power Systems Engineering Disision Senior Engineer l

Wrote test procedure and performed Developed hydraulic testing series of tests of diesel generator jacket methodology for arvice water system i water cooler thermal performance as and field-verified a system hydraulic part of a site assignment. (1993) model using test results. (1991) i' Helped technical staff prepare for NRC fvaluated cooling water flow and net service water inspection while assigned positive suction head for auxiliary feed to station technical staff. -(1993) pumps. (1990)

. Wrote test procedure, and organized Developed hydraulic model of auxiliary

!' and performed thermal tests of safety- feedwater, fire protection, and service related room coolers while assigned to water systems. (1989)

, station technical staff. (1993)

- Braidwood 1 and 2,1175 MW each.

- Quad Cities 1 and 2,828 MW each. Drafted station procedures for heat Evaluated performance tests of residual transfer testing of component cooling heat removal heat exchangers using and diesel generator heat exchangers.

Electric Power Research Institute and (1991)

Sargent & Lundy methodologies. (1992)

- LaSalle 1 and 2,1132 MW each.

Evaluated operability of diesel generators Evaluated performance tests and

for reduced cooling water flows. (1990) potential baffle bypass flow for residual  !

heat exchangers. (1991) -

Developed hydraulic model of low- i pressure service water system. (1989) Determined flow rate for reactor core t- isolation cooling steam line break

- Zion 1 and 2,1098 MW each, through partially open isolation valve.

Drafted thermal and hydraulic design (1989) requirements section of service water design basis document. (1992)

- Clinton 1,990 MW.

Developed new cooling water Performed safety evaluation of main requirements for emergency diesels by steam safety relief valve setpoint change evaluating jacket water and lubricating as part of a site assignment. (1993) oil coolers. (1992) '

!. Combined saferv- and non-safety-related Determined fill and actuation time for sersice water system models and containment spray system. (1992) benchmarked models against hydraulic tests. :1992)

Developed conceptual plan for dual unit service water system outage and Developed fwdrauiic model for service conceptual design for numerous seruce water ssstem. :1989)  !

water system modifications as part of a site assignment. r1991) a Xorea Electric Power Corporation 4- Yonggwang 3 and 4,1000 MW each.

Page 3  :

H944 9 060695

l

+ l A l dh secuens & Lundy"' JACK F. WAKELAND l

'}/ Power Swtems Engineering Division Senior Engineer Sized steam generator blowdown line.

(1990) PRIOR TO SARGENT & LUNDY

  • General Dynamics-Electric Boat Division

- Palo Verde 1 3,1304 MW each. - 56W submarine propulsion plant.

Prepared system design temperature and Engineer. Developed specifications for pressure calculations for diesel fuel and decay heat removal service water pump circulating water, resolved engineering and propulsion plant fresh water heat problem reports, and initiated drawing exchanger. (1987 to 1988) and manual changes. Was trained in erosiorxorrosion evaluation. (1989 to

  • Illinois Power 1990) - Clinton 1, nuc.' ear,990 MW.

Engineer, Safety Evaluation and Ucensing

  • Tennessee Valley Authority Group. Managed and reviewed reactor

- Watts Bar 1,1270 MW. water level instrument adequacy study.

Prepared design pressure and Scheduled and coordinated design and temperature calculations for emergency construction activities for emergency service water system. (1989) operations facility. (1982 to 1984)

Assisted licensing verification effort at PUBLICATIONS the plant site of final safety analysis report design criteria and technical - "PC-Based Hydraulic Model of PWR Service specifications. Revised fire protection Water System," EPRI Service Water System design criteria to meet regulatory Reliability Improvement Seminar, November requirements. (1988) 1989

  • Ornaha Public Power District " Evaporator Simulation," M.S. Thesis, Purdue

- Fort Calhoun 1,502 MW. University (Herrick Laboratories Report No.

Performed evaluation of boiling and refill 0801-1), May 1988 of containment air coolers during LOCA/

, LOOP to resolve a GL9646 issue.

(1996)

Coordinated multidisciplinary design reviews of five modification packages.

(1988) a Public Service Electric and Gas Company

- Salem 1 and 2, nuclear,1,170 MW each.

Helped system engineering to determine the scope of outage work, track the proFress of outage work, perform root cause analyses, and resoke other engineering issues during extended outage. (1995 to 1996) i Page 4 H944 9 +

060695 *

' 1 i

/

Shs

"""**e"*'"' FERNANDO 8. GALLEGOS PLANT DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SENIOR ENGINEER I

l EDUCATION .

B.S. Civil Engineering, Mapua institute of

  • Electrical Designer,1988 Technology, Philippines -

Designed cable and conduit routing and prepared bill of materials for cables, PROFICIENCIES - conduit, cable trays, junction boxes and  ;

  • Knowledge of Autocad.

other electrical related items. Resolved Fifteen years experience in electrical design field problems by coordinating with the '

' of nuclear and fossil fuel power plants, physical, wiring group and other including seven years of field work on engineers.

inspection programs and walkdowns.

Knowledgeable with various types of

  • Byron 1 & 2, Braidwood 1 & 2 Nuclear drawings such as electrical, structural, Plant,1978-1988

, architectural and HVAC. -

Designed and reviewed electrica!

installation drawings to resolve REGISTRATIONS construction problems. Prepared and reviewed engineering change notices and field change requests. Designed EXPERIENCE special supports for conduits and 1995-Present provided several mounting details for Work in manufacturing operation. different electrical equipments. Other  :

projects with practically the same scope Fermi Power Plant, 1991-1994 of work were: LaSalle 1 & 2, Nuclear, i Prepared, incorporated and reviewed 1132 MW each; Zion 1 & 2, Nuclear, engineering design packages. Scope of 810 MW each: Dresden 2 & 3, Nuclear, work required cable and conduit routing 810 MW each; Quad Cities 1 & 2, and using vendor drawings. Prepared Nuclear, 828, MW, cable tabs and bill of materials.

Interfaced with control and instrumentation engineers.

Located equipment, cable routing and preparation of bill of materials.

Designed block interconnection

  • diagrams on all systems. Involved in slice investigation of cable routing, segregation, type codes and loadings.

Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Prepared and reviewed cable and conduit routings. Performed conduit walkdown and cable walkdown.

4 Page 1 i SABesos ,

S/5/97

l(.. <

t T

CONFLICT OF-INTEREST STATEMENT MILLSTONE - Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)

L V E. 6aokk r'b r L- 1

. Proposed Consultant . Consultant's Employer i

i.

My participation in the Millstone Unit 3 ICAVP [() does kdoes not) involve situations or relationships in which I had direct previous involvement with activities at the plant that I will be reviewing and 1 [( ) have $ do not have] conflicting roles that might bias my judgment in relation to my 4 work on the ICAVP. In addition l 1. g i have not been previously employed by Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO ofits predecessors.

() I have been previously employed by NNECO or some ofits predecessors. (State the nature of the employment.)

2. $ 1 have not previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a subcontractor.

'() I have previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a subcontractor, 3, g) I have no other business relations (member of NNECO's Board of Directors, member of an >

4 ~ Offsite Review Committee, etc.) with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create the appearance of a conflict of interest.

( ) I have other business relations with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create the 4

appearance of a conflict of interest.

,- 4. h I have not been previously employed by the subject Millstone unit's architect.epgineer(AE)

( S7t^'i r UdAWc!L), the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) vendor (4cGud W ),

or any of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit.

), .

y () I have been previously employed by the subject Millstone unit's AE (

the NSSS vendor ( ), or one or more of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the

employment.)

5.- (f 1, and my immediate family, do not own or control financial interests (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc.) in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( %d e L/ E th r,14 ), or the NSSS vendor ( W n % 0 seau ),

, . ( ) I, or a member of my immediate family, own or control financial interests (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc.)in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the  !'

NSSS vendor ( ).

1 1 o' 2 Enclosure 3 4

, a e-..- e-,+ < - , ,a- ,, - , -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - --

J

\ lie,Sololt( '

Proposed Consultant Consultant's Employer

6. h Members of my immediate family are not employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE (STONE r WE//TtR ), or the NSSS vendor ( NWo* W ) associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit.

4 () Members of my immediate family are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE

( ), or the NSSS vendor ( ) associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the employment.)

ect

7. h My close relatives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are not employed by NNECO, the subj#

Millstone unit's AE ( 5 Tone r W4FEL ), or the NSSS vendor ( WJ7/*4 do c( )

in a management capacity.

t '() My close relatives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the NSSS vendor ( )in a management capacity. (State the nature of the employment.)

8. Have you been promised any additional compensation, reward or anything of value, contingent upon the position you take on any issue being considered by you in connection with the subject

< Millstone unit ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

( ) YES. Explain.

%NO _

9. Do you know of any reason, whether or not inquired about in this questionnaire, that would affect your ability to be completely objective in performing any of the tasks assigned to you in connection with the subject Millstone unit's ICAVP7 If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

l hNO ( ) YES. Explain.

10. Are you aware of anything that might create a perception that you would not act with objectivity in performing any of the tasks assigned to you in connection with the subject Millstone unit's 4 ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

( ) Yes. Explain.

hNO I certify that the statements I hwe made on this form are true, complete, and correct to the best of my i knowledge and if the circumstances surrounding the responses change during performance of the 4 ICAVP for the subject Millstone unit, I will inform the NRC of those changes.

I ( "h- ~ n b h.- ?7 Signature Date In the etiowe stelements. the term ' employed' is construed to mean any form of employment. esther drect. as a contrecsor, or as a suticontrocner. The term *immediate femdy' incdudes the interwowee's cruldren, stopchddren, spouse. parents. stopperents.

mother <rWew. folher4rWew, twetherse4ew, sisters <rWow. or any person Irving with the interwowee

+u- -an ,-, , e,, , , , y- .-,

y ---....

-_ . .- - . - - - . - .. . - _ . = - . - - . - ~ ..._. - - - - . -

i CONFLICT-OF-INTEREST STATEMENT MILLSTONE Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)

c. E. tAA s.w d tL J y 1

. Proposed Consultant ConsultMt's Employer /

J My participation in the Millstone Unit 3 1CAVP [( ) does ( ) does not) involve situations or relationships in which I had direct previous involvement with activities at the plant that I will be ,

4 reviewing and I [( ) have ( ) do not have) conflicting roles that might bias my judgment in relation to my j work on the ICAVP. In addition 4

1. g I have not been previously employed by Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) or any ,

ofits predecessors.

() I have been previously employed by NNECO or some of its predecessors. (State the nature of the employment.)

2. g I have not previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a subcontractor.

() I have previously provided design er engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a subcontractor.

[ 3. K l have no other business relations (member of NNECO's Board of Directors, member of an 4 Offsite Review Committee, etc.) with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create the appearance of a conflict of interest.

() I have other business relations with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create the

. appearance of a conflict ofinterest.

i

4. p I have not been previously employed by the subject Millstone unit's architect-engin r,(AE)

> ( Sbd/N A sk), the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) venoor ( h les . *Mfr$-  :

or any of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject Mills %e unit. l l

() I have been previously employed by the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ),

J t the NSSS vendor ( ), or one or more of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the employment.)

I, and my immediate family, do not own or control financial interests (stocks, bonds, mutual

5. )( funds, etc.)in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( - ), or the NSSS vendor ( _. ).

() ' I, or a member of my immediate family, own or control financial interests (stocks, bonds, mutual  ;

. funds, etc.)in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the j

- NSSS vendor ( ). ,

I 1 of 2 Enclosure 3 g w m - - rr _m' se ~ u

9 l

i

j. Proposed Consultant Consultant's Employer
6. % Members of my immediate family are not employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE

(~ ), or the NSSS vendor ( _) associated with

. design or construction of the subject Millstone unit.

1

() Members of my immediate family are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE

( ), or the NSSS vendor ( ) associated with

. design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the employment.)
7. K My close reistives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are not employed by NNECO, the subject )

Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the NSSS vendor (

in a management capacity.

( ) My close relatives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the NSSS vendor ( )in a management capacity. (State the nature of the employment.)

- 8. Have you been promised any additional compensation, reward or anything of value, contingent

upon the position you take on any issue being considered by you in connection with the subject Millstone unit ICAVP7 If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

( ) YES. Explain.

4 a

KNO _

9. Do you know of any reason, whether or not inquired about in this questionnaire, that would affect your ability to be completely objective in performing any of the tasks assigned to you h conr.ection with the subject Millstone unit's ICAVP7 If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

( ) YES. Explain.

KNO 2

- 10. Are you aware of anything that might create a perception that you would not act with objectivity in performing any of the tasks assigned to you in connection with the subject Millstone unit's

! ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

( ) Yes. Explain.

KNO I'

I certrfy that the statements I have made on this form are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and if the circumstances surrounding the responses change during performance of the

. ICAVP for the subject Millstone unit, I will inform the NRC of those changes.

%ww f4 O \ %: t 8v ln/ m Signature Date Iriih stove statemente, me term

  • employed
  • is construed to mean any form of employment, either direct, as a contractor, or as a subcontressor. The Istm *immodels femdy' includes the intennewee's chidren stopchddren, apouse, parents, steppetents, momer eWow, temer<ndow, twoheredn law, sistersandow. or any person living wien the interviewee

F- 9 l.:

l l

~

. 1

t. 1 CONFLICT OF-INTEREST STATEMENT

! MILLSTONE - Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)

! @MhjAbjp# 6AkW66$ 6A9dr64]f d LUkipT Consultant's Employer f$roposed Consultant -

~ My participation in the Millstone Unit d ICAVP [( ) d'oes (Nees not] involve situations or -

2 relationships in which I had direct previous involvement with activities at the plant that I will be reviewing and I [() have (gdo not havel conflicting roles that might bias my judgment in relation to my i work on the ICAVP. In addition l 1.~ (/l have not been previously employed by Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) or any

' ofits predecessors.

l ( ) I have been previously employed by NNECO or some of its predecessors. (State the nature of the employment.)

. 2 #1 have not previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a subcontractor. '

t

( ) I have previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone l j

unit as a contractor or a subcontractor.

3. ([I have no other business relations (member of NNECO's Board of Directors, member of an '

' Offsite Review Committee, etc.) with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may ensate the

appearance of a conflict of interest.

- () I have other business relations with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create the

] appearance of a conflict ofinterest.

1 4 (4'l have not been pre viously employed by the subject Millstone unit's architect enginepr (AE)

I he. / 4)dbs78 v ), the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) vendor ( /desNkem, or any of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject MillsWne unit.

1, 2 () I have been previously employed by the subject Millstone unit's AE f the NSSS vendor ( ), or one or more of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the .

l t employment.)

4

. 5.' ([1, and my immediato family,' do not own or control financial interests (stocks,)onds, mutual

^ funds, etc.) in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( WTWwert## ), or the NSSS v'endor.(#mW. M M ). Wkiss J WiWiPR l

J

"( ) I, or a member of my immediate family, own or control financial interests (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc.) in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the NSSS vendor (- ).

  • 1 of 2 Enclosure 3 l

t (8.tJAblP# 6i AW4def' 4ArCi6M d tinlpf $

[ Proposed Consultant Consultant's Employer

6. ([ Members of im diate family are not employed by NNECO, th subject Millstone unit's AE i

(ff0d$d FM ), or the NSSS vendor (v/fbC Mi &O ) associated with -

- design or construction of the subject Millstone unit.

() Members of my immediate family are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone untt's AE I ), or the NSSS vendor ( ) associated with

  • l design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the employment.)

l 7. (@, ilose relatives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are not employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( 6fal6 M66&if% ), or the NSSS vendor ( )

in a management capacity.

t

( ) My close relatives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone

! unit's AE ( ), or the NSSS vendor ( )in a j management capacity. (State the nature of the employment.)

d i

8. Have you been promised any additional compensation, reward or anything of value, contingent i' upon the position you take on any issue being considered by you in connection with the subject Millstone unit ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

([NO ( ) YES. Explain. _

1

9. Do you know of any reason, whether or not inquired about in this questionnaire, that would affect  :

your ability to be completely objective in performing any of the tarks assigned to you in connection '

with the subject Millstone unit's ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

([NO ( ) YES. Explain.

10. Are you aware of anything that might create a perception that you would not act with objectivity in performing any of the tasks assigned to you in connection with the subject Millstone unit's  :

ICAVP7 If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

(<)'NO ( ) Yes. Explain.

I certify that the statements I have made on this form are true, complete, and correct to the best of my

. knowledge and if the circumstances surrounding the responses change during performance of the

' ICAVP for the subject Millstone unit, I willinform the NRC of those changes.

l G///u , ,nra _

k :~ C Signature' '> Date irt me stove elslemente, the term *employe f le conspued to mean any form of employment, either direct, se e contecapr. or es e subconsecaer The term *1mmediate femdy' inssudes the riterwowee's cNdren, etapanildren, spouse, perente, esopperente, moeieHWew, talheNrWear, teelhore4 Mew, eistenHMew, or any person IMng ween the interwowse

_ _ . _ _ ____. _._ _ _ . _ .~___ _ ___. ____ .._ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . . . _ _ _ ___

i-fQ m 7,wg' . u w m. .. ; . n . .y .

,, m. .m. ~ ,ir;.,., x ,n ., y s . .

. 7.,. ,. , , ,

..~

,w i

loo rete E, Nuer MW E osn een ~,

l Proposed Consultant Cormultents Employer l 5. @ Members of my immediate femdy are not employed tnt NNECO, the subged Millstone unWe AE i 54,, + #e4r he 1, orthe N865 vendori Was m A <." e '

i eseosmeadwitn design or construotan of the subject MEstone unit.

' () Msmhers af my immedets family are employed 'oy NNEco the aut$nat Mastone unit's AE  !

( _rk e + NA&r 3, or the N888 vender f Wsi dm Am#

1 essadeled with decipt or Genetruction o'the aut(em Midetone asnit. (8 tete pleinsture of the employment.)

I 7. @ My elone raissves (eurtts, uncles, fIret sousine) are not employed by NNECO, tis ed$od DMetene unR's AE (Inna-# #de&- --), or the NSSS vendor ( we&Mp hea r 1 in a management espadty.

() My cioes reistli fee (sulta, uncles, first cousine) are employed by NNECO, the sutilset Mastone unWe AE t 1%e + Web dre 1, or the N8SS 'm t_ Wses + 6 M 1ln s management cepecety. (State the nature of the employment.)

s. Hem you been pW: any addtional ,.r.,, "-,, reward or anything of vobe, contingent I agon tria ponton you tam on sny 6ssa txtig considered by you in connection with the out(set MEstone unit ICAVP? If yse, primde a detailed description orths simumstanose.

M No ( ) vus. Explain.

9. Do you know of any aseson, whether or not inqured aoovt in this questionnaire, that would eneet your shdity to be es.TCNy otinctive in performing any of the teoks asesynod to you in connecdon with the subject Mastone unit's ICAVF7 ff yes. provide a dataded desenption of the circumetences, i
(4 NO ( ) YES. Explain.

l Are you swore of m,W,g that niight crosde a percepdon that you would not act with otgedivity 10.

in perfbrang any of the teoks seeigned to you in connection wfth the suefoot Massano unit's

CAVP? If yes, pnwide a detodied -----M- . of the cdroumetences.

M No ( ) Yes. Explain.

i i omrtify that the statements I have meds on tNo form are true, compiece, anet correct taats best of my lutowledge and if the cdraumedences mumoundng #w responses thenge stunng r l,cc;.; s of the ICAVP for the eutilaat amatone unst, I we inform the fetc of those changes.

NMO w ~

C/H ? ?

Osas Signature w e, answe saammeren, wie tonn *engesyear as enneswas to sanan arv trm at wesesyment, echer areet, as a sessenet, or as a f

amenesseur. The enn 'wunasants theuenssumes the venMemmers aMwen, senseresen, soouen. perenes, semperous.

' wunaNrHer. 4WisNMee, INesteribe4ser, esAgrINrpter, or any parawi GWql wg) to peergeges, I

2 af 2

ya inyyg.sr a u w 2mim . n . c .:..ni. w.. m- m .,.3 , m .,~., a n e,

-~ . .

.m.,m su.u.n*u.

.~ ~ ..

I '

CONFUCT,OF INT 8 REST STATTsMENT

(

i ulLLSTONE - ladependent Corrective Adlon Vennosten Program (ICAVP) i ldaeen E. Pkec _-

uw E ,.. ~ a  ;

Propeosd Consubent Consultant's firnpioyer  ;

! My partidpotion in the MWetone Unli 3 (CAVP [() does M does notilnvolve altustions or

reiseeneNpe in which I had dired provous involvement wlm estivities et 9m plant that I wel tm

! nsytembe and I [() have 60 do not howo] conflicting rotos that might biae my jud0 ment in redeten to my

! work on the iCAvP. In seistion

! 1. M i have not been prwously employed by Northenet Nucesar Energy Company (NNECO) or any attas W .

() I have been p...td employed i by NNECO or some of its predeonesers. (Stets the nature of l

the employment.)

1 2. M i have net previously pmvided design er engineervie services to NNECO for the out$not

! Mastone unit es a contractor or e subcontractor.

l () I have p#wviously provided design or engineering services to NNECO fer the eutioot Mienione

unit es e contrastor or e subcontnador.
3. M i have no amor businese relations (member of NNECO's Board of Directors, member of en Olpelle Review Commates, etc.) with NNECO for the out$ed usesono unR that mer ensate the appearance of e enniet ofintwest.

! () I have other bustransa relations with NNECO for the subject M$ stone unit that may asete the

sppserence ata conmet ofintwest.

t j 4 M i novo not been prw'ous#y empisyed by the stepot uiristone twet's orche.ed engtneer (AE)

( We v we 6* " ), the nuclear steem supply system (N888) vendor t Mr4 du / ),

or any of their predeonesors eseccleted with design or construction of the aut$ect Mastone unt.

2 i () I have been previoustemployed try the subject Mllistone unit's AE S tf ."

  • Me 4 e 4' d,
  • the N888 vendori len% A e ,o r 1, or one ormore of their Wars essociated with denen er construction of the outdoot Mitletone unit. (8 tete the nature of the

] employment.)

5. (4 4. and my Mmtseste famfy, do not cum or control firienciat interests (stocke, bonde, mutual funses, etc.)in NNECO, the eutted M5 stone unit's AE f MM. r M /" w ), er the N888 venderI- ' n , 4 +, /, , . < r 1.

4

( ) 1. or a member of my immediate famfy, own or ceremi finanaal intereste (stoesce, bonds, mutual

  • v < /, . 4 - ),orthe funds, etc.)in NNECO, the outdod 'Mastone unit's AE t J $ w i NSSS vendor f v'e :m- i.

1 of 2 Sncicoure 3 i I 3 )

< l 1

_-_L_:___-______-___-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . - , _ - '.__ .-. _ - ,

i

! CONFLICT-OF INTEREST STATEMENT MILLSTONE - Independent Ccrrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP)

(

R '? <; MPPbPr> < A l'< G )] 7 s t 4 ) v'  :

o.ns ant's Eh1ployer i ' Proposed Consultant l

/, ,

//  ? l My participation in the Millstone Unit 1 lCAVPWpdoes ( s no:]Inv ive situations or relationships in which I had direct previous involvement with activities at the plant that I will be

reviewing and I (() have (4 do not have] conflicting roles that might blas my judgment in relation to my
work on the ICAVP. In additien
1. ;(j I have not been previously employed by Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) or any of f!s predecessors. '

-() I have been previously employed by NNECO or some of its predecessors. (State the nature o 4 the employment.)

4

2. () I have not previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a suocontractor.

(d I have previously provided design or engineering services to NNECO for the subject Millstone unit as a contractor or a subcontractor, g gvwo 4 M E. MyhM-

3. (A 1 have no other business relations (member of NNECO's Board of Directors, member of an 4

Offsite Review Committee, etc.) with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create the j appearance of a conflict of interest.

( ) I have other Dusiness relations with NNECO for the subject Millstone unit that may create th

! appearance of a conflict of interest.

4 (,) I have not beeg previously employed by the subject Millstone unrt's architect-engineer (A )

(Az < LiaIA ), the nuclear steam supply system (NSSS) vendor ('d.uAL a * ),

or any of their predecessors associated with design or construction of the subject Mijlstone u

),

I () I have been previously employed by the subject Millstone unit's AE (

), or one or more of their predecessors the NSSS vendor (

associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the 7 j employment.)

5

5. (J I, and my immediate family, do not own or control financialinterests (stocks, bonds, mutual

< 4 / A .- ), or the

, funds, etc.) in NNEC9:, ^<w the subject 1 Millstone unit's AE ( h 4- NSSS vendor ( 0. ..

J

( ) I, or a member of my imInediate family, own or control financial interests ), or the(stocks, bon 4

funds, etc.)in NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE (

NSSS vendor ( ).

1 of 2 Enciosure 3 q.

4 i

O ne .^ te N5 '

g a g u y ,. l p abL, J ,- ,

<~"af

...,fj., ,,

[w!j jaQ ( ?q'-4 Ah esn-a$

u ,. - c i

j ega a- a d g j .

0 2 d e,

/ '

L ' .. <

- ^M LL

f. v ) L

( 2,

/

fp spf ,

I005

  • 1 Af f'f ^
  • /a/n l

l l

1 I

l 1

. 1 l -

1 l

l 0 . r c aimwdn =%nv s t.& p v Proposed Consultant Consultant's Employer L

6. (A Members (dw >Aof my4-i mediate ), or the family NSSS arevendor not employed

( v/ea L ,/ bymNNECO, the subject i associated with Millstone unit's design or' construction of the subject Millstone unit. g

() Members of my immediate family are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE

( ), or the NSSS vendor ( ) associated with design or construction of the subject Millstone unit. (State the nature of the employment.)

7. (,) My close relatives (aunts, uncles, first pousins) are not employed by NNECOy the s,ubject Millstone unit's AE (e6 J v Wew ), or the NSSS vendor ( vAch # wL )

in a management capacity. ' '[

() My close relatives (aunts, uncles, first cousins) are employed by NNECO, the subject Millstone unit's AE ( ), or the NSSS vendor ( iin a management capacity. (State the nature of the employment.)

8. Have you been premised any additional c,ompensation, reward or anything of value, contingent upon the position you take on any issue being considered by you in connection with the subject Millstone unit ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

(dNO ( ) YES. Explain. _

l l 9. Do you know of any reason, whether or not inquired about in this questionnaire, that would affect your ability to be completely objective in performing any of the tasks assigned to you in connection with the subject Millstone unit's ICAVP? If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

l (x) NO ( ) YES. Explain.

10. Are you aware of anything that might create a perception that you would not act with objectivity )

in performing any of the tasks assigned to you in connection with the subject Millstone unit's ICAVP7 If yes, provide a detailed description of the circumstances.

( <) NO ( ) Yes. Explain.

I certify that the statements I have made on this form are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and if the circumstances surrounding the responses change during performance of the ICAVP for the subject Millstone unit, I willinform the NRC of those changes.

f C i /

[ . j{n NM:w V a l' : I =m Signature Data

//

1 in em eeove eastomena. the term

  • employer is conesued to mean any form of employment, enhor direa, se e conoscesr. or es e sueconrecer. The term 'immeeses temsy' inceues Ine reannewee's chkiren, scopouldren, spouse, peroms sesaperents. l malher4 Mow, folher< Mew, tuoihere4 Mow, eneenHMow, or any person IMng wah the ineonnewee.

a

u1I" c,1 - ;m;in ! & u im ; , '

Nct Mp,wg:Nij !{\pyig .j.m7 m o7 r,t

. $2hT GY:5AltGENT & !.l.hDY 2&G06 4-28-97 : 3:10PN : SAREhT 4 LLhDY-120-09'83100-1815744;* 2/ 3 CONFlJCT 0P 4NTER55T STATEIARNT

. MILL. STONE Independent Corrective Acton Verificagon Program (ICAVP) l ,

Ror w rLC lJm.yggy O autsv l

l Troposed Coneumont &ceneuments w $mp p l

My portapston in the Meistone Unk ,d.,ICAVP [( ) does 6(does notl Involve altuadone or is oneneNpe in which I had carest precious involverrwnt wd'estMiles et the pl6nt that i uis be l reviewine end i II ) have Wee not hevel oormoung roles that might bios my Judrwnt in reieson to rny work enThe ICAVP. h eEbWon

t. K I have not been previously employed by Northeast Nucieer Energy CGT,Lv (NNECO) or any efits g:f:::-- .

() I have been previously empieyed by NNECO or some ofits ,,,- '_ ^ : n ($ tete the nenue of the empisyment.) j

2. g i have not provieuely provided design or engineeHng serviose to NNECO fbr the outqlect
  • taistene unit se a contracter or a subconkoeter.

( ) I have previously provided deelen or engincedng sewises to NNECO fbr the subject MMotone unit es e sentractor or a subeentranier.

3. # I have no alhar buelnees reletlene (member othNECC's Seerd of Direhtete, enomber of en Offsite Pleview CommNtes. etc.) weh NNECO for the subloot Milletone unit that rasy creets the appostence of a conect ofinterest.

() I have other businese reindone with NNECO for the = W M18 stone unit that may creele the espearance of a centset atinterest.

4. )( l have not prov6ously employed by the out@ct Meetene unit's ECM r '- :(AB)

M~**ut Efa'), the nusaar steem supply system (NEB 8) vender t [srrwumf or any of their predesseeers assoaisted with design or annoirween of the subject heemone mit.

1,

() I have been prevleuely employed by the sul$ct MEstone mit's AE f the N888 venderi 1, er one er more of their groelseseecr5 associated unh design er eenstrueden of the out$eet MWetene unit. (8tute the nature of the empanymenta

5. () 1, and my immediate somey, do not own er consol financialiteereses (stoefs, hende, mutuoi lands, ses.) h PetECO, the a@ Meistene untt AE f - 1, or em N0ee vender ( ).

)( t, era member et imrnedleVs AmmNy, cum or cordral finenaalinterests (alscha, bonde, mutual Aands, see.)in 0, the outgest Mastene unit's Air ina'r A us,est t or the D888 venderr nMMond t '

h0 $4Kff Yr:rn%tMUf 1 of 2 DM W<= f( Enutosuns8

. kn M4swuxiyofypy icy.. , g_n 3. ,, ;.3 3a m 1 t o r Lcw swam .3 ,ig sin : y n

, SENT BY:iutGE\T 4 u'\DY 21006 : 1-20-87 3:15PM : SAME\T a MMY-120-03383100-18137.lo: 3/ 3 l

LacerT IJnowi Proposed conewtont -

Azuurhaun y ConouNonra Enipdayer

8. / Members immodate family are not employed by NPECO me sutket Mestare unrs M efrwe /As rre 1, or the NSSS wondor fida redN * # ~ 1sesseistedinel daugn or sumskustian of the outjeet AMetone unt.

l

() Members of rny immedete $5muy are empesyed by fedECO, the aut(ed Milletone unre AE f 1, orthe NOSS wenderi )

ienseminand wem design or eenstruceen of tne ousfoot Mestone unit, (aleen the nesse of me employment.)

7. g My eteen releaves (eunts, imeles, $ ret cousine) are not employed by , the subfust

. Muutone unre A3 #412mr4 Wrmy:sf L or the N000 vender f4 MEma# 1 h a meramemment esposey.

() My sleen vaisshe (aunes, undes, erst seusine) are employed by NNECO, the sutisetMgstone usere As f 1,or the Nees vender f --

1ha managemes cepeasty. stese inn netwo of the omoseyment.)

a. Have you been promheed any adddenal espelen, romand eranytNng of wegue, conungent seen the poelden you tehe en any leeue behig eeneidened by you h Bennostion with the out(sat Mastens unt ICAVP7 ff yes, provide a delssed desertption of the aircumetenome 96NO ( )YES. Expeem. _
t. So you inew Ef any nessen, whether or net hquired about h this quee6'onnelre, that would eNeet your abuty to be completely otp: eve in perteming any of the tasks assNned to you in conneedon witi the subient MWetone unts ICAVP7 ff yes, provide a detailed desertpier of tie circumsteness.

l pqfNO ( ) YEE. Explain.

i h perbrming any of the assins seeigned to you h sonreation weh the suefect Ameutene unire icAVPt if yes, pn=ede e detesse M., ; , of the ehemmemeos, gNO ( ) Yes. Espdeln.

l certfy $15% #m EM i heWe M en 998 brm Sr8 WUe Campbde, and eerroet tp#se boot of nty Imentedge anel N tie cesarislenese er.M. the reasonese change during portrmance of fut uret, i me iness the NRC of these etenges.

$bX icAvPserempIl / p/ M/29/[7 '

nyn p -

me.sa .mmeems,me e a nsou n s e e.e . ,= = w .msm ,m en. re . . e r. n e .

messagergr. liteuse MIIf piange age aesntences M e6 m gemen, aesspausde, mustmWau. semp**lom bygghegNam, stegr>Ngw, er any pengen slog Wel1No tenWuess 3of3

t ~

1 1

4 l

I V a c Supplement to Conflict ofInterest Statement:  !

As part of my stock portfolio, I currently own approximately 460 shares of Westinghouse l

common stock.

To remove any conflict ofinterest, the Westinghouse stock will be soki within the next 60 days. ,

fY( f$ b/k  ?

a:eun yn ' ' .

date /

7 ,

9

' W

.)

i l

?

l l

6

'l I

- I 1

1 t

( *sg 4.

.- ~- - - - -.. .. .

#
b
-y ' g

.1 p

p p.

'f

'l a

(

Supplement to Conflict of laterest Statement:

o As part of the employee investment plan of St'one & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC). I currently.own a total of 240.397 shares of SWEC stock. This stock is a part of SWEC's investment plan.

. ' w hich is managed by The Putnam Family of Funds. The remainder of my employee plan investment is in Putnam mutual funds that are not afilliated with SWEC.

To remove any conflict of interest, the SWEC stock portion of my investment will be sold within the next -

thirty' days (prior to June 14, 1997).

li m f~)rvl's 7 f' ( % _ \ '

. Ajay Prakash Date t

n-1.'

1 5 i

i

  1. 1

, . . . . .