ML20236Q934
| ML20236Q934 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1998 |
| From: | External (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236Q930 | List: |
| References | |
| PI-01, PI-1, NUDOCS 9807210131 | |
| Download: ML20236Q934 (200) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:__ _ _____. _ _______ _____--- O SYSTEM VERTICAL SLICE REVIEW (SVSR) PROJECT INSTRUCTION PI-01
~
O svsRimettururir10x cascKtisrs AND WORKBOOK Sienature Dats Prepared: M# 4*-2'?- 92 Reviewed: 9/ Approved: L///17~ 6-3C- Y Approved: SeJnsff omendecio= 9807210131 DR 980714 ADOCK 05000336 O PDR
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI41. DOC June , 1 98
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECT1NSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS Section TJgg P.agg 1.0 PURPOSE iv 2.0 DEFINITIONS 1 3.0 OVERVIEW 3 4.0 REQUIRED INPUTS (PREREQUISITES) 12 4.1 Required from NNECo: 12 4.2 Required from Tier 2 Review Team: - 12 4.3 Required from Regulatory Review Team: 12 4.4 Required from Tier 3 Team 12 5.0 PROCESS 13 5.0.1 General 13 5.0.2 SVSR Verification and Validation 13 5.0.3 Use of Site Team 13 5.0.4 SVSRInstmetions and Forms 13 5.0.5 Interfaces with Other Tier / Regulatory Review Teams 14 5.0.6 Review Boundaries 14 5O 5.0.7 Initial Actions 15 5.1 Modification Review, Scope and Boundary 16 5.2 Determine Licensing Bases 17 5.3 Prepare System Specific ChecHMs/ Requirements 18 5.4 System Design Input and Licensing Design Bases 19 5.5 Programmatic /TopicalReview 21 5.6 Corrective Action Checklist 22 5.7 Modification Screening Review 23 5.8 System Modification Review 24 5.9 Operating Procedures Resiew 25 5.10 Training and Testing Review 26 5.11 AsBuilt(Walkdown) Review 28 5.12 Tier 1 SVSR Review Close-out 29 5.131CAVP Report 30 O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
i Revision 4 FI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MH1 STONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK TABLE OF CONTEN'IS Section litit East 6.0 WORKBOOK FORMS 31 6.1 General 31 SYSTEM SCOPE AND BOUNDARY INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 1 33 SYSTEM LICENSING BASES CURRENT DESIGN LISTING INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 2 36 SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 3 38 SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CHECKLIST INSTRUCITONS - FORM 4 80l SYSTEM MODIFICATION
SUMMARY
SCREENING INSTRUCTIONS -
- FORM 5 83l SYSTEM MODIFICATION
SUMMARY
LISTING INSTRUCITONS - FORM 6 86l SYSTEM MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 7 88l SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS OPERATING PROCEDURES - FORM 8 95l SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS TESTING -
) FORM 9 100l SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCITONS WALKDOWN -
FORM 10 105 SYSTEM REVIEW CLOSE-OUT INSTRUCTIONS - FORM CO 113 EXHIBITS l Exhibit 3-1 ICVAP Implementation Activities 5 Exhibit 3-2 SVSR Checklist Requirements (Confirmatory Order) 6 Exhibit 3-3 SVSR Checklist Requirements (Oversight Inspection Plan Actions 7 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A SVSR Source Book of Additional Questions O l - Parseas Power Group Inc. - ii Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 j SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK REVISIONS Section Revision No. Description D.ats All 0 InitialIssue June 09,1997 All 1 Revisions June 30,1997 All 2 Revisions September 23,1997 All 3 Revisions January 21,1998 All 4 Revisions - June 26,1998 O O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
iii Revision 4 FI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISIS AND WORKBOOK LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES 1 Pane No. Revisios No. i Pane No. McMosNo. l l 1 4 43 4 l n 4 M 4 ; I lii 4 45 4 h 4 M 4 y 4 47 4 1 4 48 4 2 4 49 4 3 4 50 4 4 4 51 4 5 4 52 - 4 6 4 53 4 7 4 54 4 8 4 55 4 9 4 56 4 10 4 57 4 11 4 58 4 12 4 59 4 13 4 60 4 14 4 61 4 15 4 62 4 16 4 63 4 O 17 18 19 4 4 4 64 65 66 4 4 4 20 4 67 4 21 4 68 4 22 4 69 4 23 4 70 4 24 4 71 4 25 4 72 4 26 4 73 4 27 4 74 4 28 4 75 4 29 4 76 4 30 4 77 4 31 4 78 4 32 4 79 4 33 4 Form 3 3 34 4 80 4 35 4 81 4 Form 1 2 82 4 36 4 Form 4 4 37 4 83 4 Form 2 2 84 4 38 4 85 4 39 4 86 4 40 4 87 4 O 41 42 4 4 Form 6 88 2 4
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
iv Revision 4 PI01. DOC June 26,1998
i IWIIJ ATONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTICN FI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Pane No, Revisies No. Pane No. Revision No. 89 4 90 4 91 4 92 4 93 4 94 4 l Form 7 4 95 4 96 4 97 4 - 98 4 99 4 Form 8 3 Form 3 3 100 4 101 4 102 4 103 4 104 4 Form 9 3 105 4
- 'f 106 4 107 4 108 4 109 4 110 4 111 4 112 4 Form 10 3 113 4 114 4 I
CO 2 i O
- Parsons Power Group lac. -
v Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
1 , MILLSTONE UNIT 2 l SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI2N PI-01 l SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 PURPOSE I i hrovide a process for systematically defining the selected system scope and l boandary conditiana through the use of system functions and critical design l characteristics of the selected system. This workbook provides the instructions and documentation to be used by the System Vertical Slice Review (SVSR) team during the course of the Millstone Unit 2 audit This workbook is intended to supplement Project Procedure PP-01 mi provide the detail directions necessary to assure a thorough and consistent review process 2.0 DEFINITIONS
- a. SVSR Groun I madar Raeinaar (GT R) - The individual responsible to direct and lead the Tier 1 SVSR review team effort.
- b. SVSR System Lead Engineer (SLE) - The individual responsible to develop, direct, and perform the scope of the system audit The System Lead Faginaar is selected by the SVSR Group Lead Ragiaaar with the concurrence of the Deputy Project Director.
- c. Deputy Project Director - The individual who is responsible to assure enmalimace to the Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICAVP) Audit Plan and the technical adequacy ofthe final reports.
- d. Originating Engineer (OE) - The individual assigned the responsibility to complete a particular task or function.
- e. Disciphne Lead Engineer (LE) - The individual responsible for directing the collection, analysis, and processing of audit data iarbding the review of the technical adaquecy of the checklist responses prepared by the OE's, reviewers, and/or specialists. This individual may also function to provide discipline interface review.
- f. Operatiana i mad Raetaaar (OLE) - The individual assigned to collect, analyze and review data associated with plant operations. This individual may also function to provide operations interface review.
- g. Maintenance Lead Engineer (MLE) - The individual assigned to collect, analyze and review data associated with plant maintenance. This individual may also function to provide maintenance interface review.
O
- Parsees Power Group Inc. -
l PI- 1 Revision 4 PLOI. DOC June 26,1998 l
MILUiTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPZOJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK
- h. Testing Lead Engineer (l'LE) - The individual assigned to collect, analyze and review data associated with plant tv. ting and training. This individual may also function to provide testing and training interface review.
- i. Soecialist - The individual who has a particular expertise required to review program / topical areas and/or provide technical consulting.
- j. Reviewer - The individual who reviews or inspects Geuments and is responsible to provide input for a checklist item.
- k. BAI- Request for additional information. This is the formal process to obtain additional information from NNECo in response to a particular SVSR request.
- 1. Discrepancy - A condition, such as an error, omission, or oversight which prevents consistence among the physical configuration, information sources (e.g. documentation and databases), design basis and/or regulatory requirements. Discrepancies are processed in accordance with Project Procedure PP-07.
- m. Modification - Any documented method that allows a change to be made to the licensing or design basis of the plant.
- n. Minor Modification - A documented package that does not change the licensing or design basis of the plant.
- o. Current Licensing Basis (CLB) is the set ofNRC requirements applicable to a specific plant and a licensee's written commitments for ensuring compliance with and operation within applicable NRC requirements and the plant-specific design basis (including all modifications and additions to such commitments over the life of the license) that are docketed and in effect.
The CLB includes the NRC regulations contained in 10 CFR Parts 2,19, 20, 21, 26, 30, 40, 50, 51, 54, 55, 70, 72, 73,100 and appendices thereto; orders, license conditions; exemptions; and technical specifications. It also includes the plant specific design-basis information defined in 10 CFR 50.2 as documented in the most recent final safety analysis report (FSAR Amendment #48) as required by 10 CFR 50.71 and the licensing correspondence such as licensee responses to NRC Bulletins, generic letters, and enforcement actions, as well as licensee commitments documented in NRC safety evaluations or licensee event reports.2 8 10 CFR 54.3 (a)
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-2 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
IwyrJRIONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI3N FI-el SVSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKIJSTS AND WORKBOOK
- p. Design Basis That information that identifies the specific functions to be performed by a structure, system, or component of a facility and the specific values or ranges of values chosen for controlling parameters as iJ, ..ce bounds for design. These values may be (1) restraints derived from generally amW state-of-the-wt practices for achievmg functional goals or (2) requirements derived from analysis (based on calculation and/or @. as) cf the effects of a posentatad accident for which a structure, system, or component must meet its functional goals.2 3.0 OVERVIEW This workbook provides a generic framework based on checklist modules that can be used to develop and conduct a system specific Design Bases and Canfiedon Management A==a==maat checklist to support the System Vertical Slice Reviews (SVSRs). Exhibit 3-1 provides an overview of the generic SVSR checklist development process The SVSR is based on the process outlined in Exhibit 3-1, which identifies the system specific licensing requirements and com. ==, and the generic checklist modules in this workbook.
The generic checklist modules in tids workbook are based on the requirements of the Ce>&w.etory Order, the NRC Oversight inWon Plan, and NRC , I InWon Guidelines. Exhibits 3-2 and 3-3 provides matrices to cross reference of Ceinmetory Order and NRC Oversight Plan requirements to the generic checklist modules included in this workbook. All checklist modules contained in this workbook nre generic and applicable to a variety of systems After system identification by the NRC, the generic modules are revised to ir.cerporate system specific considerations. A requirement will be l reviewed to a level that verifies it complies with its licensing basis. The SVSR checklist development process noted in Exlulit 3-1 is used to prepare a system specific checklist by dafining system boundaries, identifying licensing and design requirements, and identifying configuration management ! considerations. i
- 10 CFR$0.2 l
l - Parsons Power Group Inc. - PI- 3 Revision 4 Pl.01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2
$VSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O
Generic checklist modules guidance provided in this workbook that supports checklist development includes:
- System Scope and Boundary e Licensing and Design Basis Requirements
- Modifications e Corrective Action Plan
- Testing and Maintenance e Operating Procedures '
e Walkdowns The responsible SLE will prepare a workbook for. cash selected system. Each workbook is comprised ofvarious types offorms and a System Close-out checklist that are prepared in the sequence indicated in the SVSR review work
~
process. l l After the systems for review have been selected, the generic forms contained in , I this workbook will be revised to make " system specific" workbooks. Applicable l checklist / review requirements will be added to cover the areas discussed in the t NRC Order, Oversight Plan and applicable Standard Review Plan (SRP) topics. l The directions given in the instmetions in this workbook will be used by the SVSR teams to govem the methodology and provide a standard documentation format for each system. Where a conflict in the instmetions exists, the Deputy Project Director will resolve the discrepancy. U l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI.4 Revision 4 FI.01. DOC June 26,1998 ___ _ _ ____ _ _ _ ____ - a
MILISTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-0I SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS13 AND WORKBOOK ExWWt 3-1 ICAVPIMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES I e :
-..i,i 7_
j f 3
" s -
iiil J liiii iil S,I, Illi -+ aI M _! ,l.. l,.
~
iil-M .o III! lil ji I I i llll' 'u 2
=
4 illl-l
---+
l! - rl:.--1. a I
- a M i g
e i :
.I s 1 :
$ j iillsi lli i e ..
5 " lll !!!! lil ! ili lli i lii i E [If l!
! -{
I 7, i___________l_l_.! ,!i -lli' lg 1, q U 3 fi PI-5 Revision 4 PM1. DOC hne 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2
'-SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCHON PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECEIJS'IS AND WORKBOOK h
0 Exhibit 3-2 SVSR Checklist Requirements AREA e6 5 y
- H Confirmatory Order Actions aa n. =
.l j g g a m s Uoensee committed 10 the scope of the %VP,seview encompassing modifications e m%ihe emocied e,mems enae inom %, %.
Review engineering design X X. Review configuration control processes X X X Verify cunent as-modified plant conditions against design basis X X X Verify current as-modified plant conditions against licensing basis documentation X X X Verify that desegn requirements are translated into operating procedures X Verify that design requirements are translated into maintenance procedures Q Verify that design requirements are translated X ty into test procedures Venfy that licensing bases is translated into operating procedures X Verify that licensing bases are translated into maintenance procedures X Verify that licensing bases is translated into test procedures X Verify system performance through review of specific test records X Verify system performance through y observation of selected testing of particular systems Review proposed and implemented corrective actions for Licensee-identified design deficiencies X 1
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-6 Revisice 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
T unJJiTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTBGBTRUCTION PI-41 SVSRIMP12 MENTATION CBENTRIli AND WORKBOOK
) EdGR33
'SV8R Checklist Requirements AREA Oversight inspection Plan Actions h
Design modifications are adequate X l Control of the design has been maintained l since issuance of the initial operating X 1 license Control of the design bases has been - maintained since issuance of the initial X X operating license System's current configuration conforms to l Its licensing bases and will be capable of X X X l performing its intended function l System's original design that has not been modified conforms to its licensing bases and X X X will be capable of posforming its intended function System modificebons made since issuance of the initial operahng license conform to its q licensing bases and will be capable of X X X performing its intended function Verify that the licensee's design engineers had sufficient technical guidance to perform X X assigned engineering functions Verify that the regulatory requirements are correctly implemented and the system can X X X perform its spedfied fundions Vertfy that the limnsing-bases are conectly implemented ar4 the system can perfonn X X X lts specified fundions The updated Final Safety Analysis Repost (FSAR) accurately reflects the current X X licensing bases, l The updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) accurately reflects the cunent plant X X configuration The updated Final Safety Analysis Report j (FSAR) accurately reflects the operational X X X l charadeitstics 1 The analyzed factmy configuration in the design bases is consistent with the current X X l plant configuration of the unit i The analyzM faclay coollguration in the design bases is copeinhun with the current X X X l plant operabonal charaderistics of the unit ,
- Pames Pmr Group Inc. -
M-7 Revision 4 M41. DOC June 26,1998
MITJSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECfINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTA'I10N CHEmiJRTS AND WORKBOOK O .o E
=
F = F E f, Oversight inspedion Plan Actions ]$ 8g e 2 o. 3 g iii ] y g 3 a S S 33 The conact licensing-bases information has been refketed in the maintenance X procedures The correct licensin0-bases information has been reflected in the responsible X engineering procedures The correct licensing-bases information has X been reflected in the operations procedures System design changes have not invalidated preoperational testing. X X System design changes have not y y invalidated startup acceptance Desgn controls have been applied t X X temporary modifications design changes Design controls have been applied to design y procedure changes Design controls have been applied t O change the configuration of the facility. Design controls have been applied t X X X X change the operation of the facility. Verify the adequacy of the licensee's corrective actions as part of the CMP and in X X response to the ICAVP findings. Assess the adequacy of the licensee's effectiveness of implementation of the X X corrective actions developed as part of the CMP and in response to the ICAVP findings. Review of procedural controls for modifying or changing the facility operational X X characteristics. Verify the current configuration accurately refieds the licensing-bases, including the X X updated FSAR. The calculations and analyses were performed using recognized and acceptable X X analytical methods. The assumptions made in calculations supporting the change are technically X X sound. The assumptions made in analyoss O supporting the chaage are tedmically sound. X X
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
M-8 Revision 4 501. DOC June 26,1998
MILIETONE UNIT 2 ~ SVERPRO3ECTEMS1ESCI10N M 41 SYSRIMFunEENTATION GECIGJSTS AND WORKBOOK AREA Oversight inspection Plan Actions f 1i - I , mm s _.__s pp_g .e unmodified portions of the original configuration and design changes are X reasonable (based on engineering judDement) for the scope of the change. The results of analysis supporting the
^
unmodified portions of the original configuration and demon changes are X i reasonable (based on engineering judooment) for the scope of the change The licensee considered the effed of a change on design margins. X X The appropriate level of engineering and management review existed during the X X design phase and prior to implementation. The licensee conadored the effect of a change on pre-operational acceptance test X X s results. The licensee considered the effect of a chanDe to startup acceptance test results The licensee considered the effect of a change to system baseline acceptance test X X results Design changes were accomplished in accordance with the licensee's approved X X procedures.
]
Design changes are accurately reflected in operating procedures. X X Design changes are accurately reflected in maintenance procedures. X X l Design changes are accurately reflected in test procedures X X l Design changes are accurately reflected in training mataisis. X X Proposed design changes, subsequently cancehd, were not replaced by pnxaiural X ' changes that imposed excessive burdsns on ! plant operators. ; The. h te be. N^ @j[k jh sovimssindudnglasasninimum/ ' l Mechanical systems, X Mechanical components, X O Elodrical power, Civil and structural design, and Instrumentation and combal X X X
- rarsons rower breep sac. -
M-9 ~ Revision 4 M-01. DOC June 26,1998 1 i
.____.______.___________________._______b
MILIATONE UNIT 2 ; SYS3PROJECFINSTRUCTION FI-41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION - mfS eBD WOMEBOSE ; W E Vill LIT 3-3
. P"L.- - j e
Oversight insgxM: tion Plan Actions Walkdowns will verify adequate control of surveillance procedures % Walkdowns will verify adequate control of operating procedures, % Walkdowns will vertfy adequate control of maintenance procedures, .% Wamdowns will vertfy adequate control of . ; test procedures, Walkdowns will verify adequate control of l operator training, Walkdowns will vestfy adequate control of nant simulator configuration M8MikeusenteenAguisdentes.. 3 j agg g. a p j sammhemat g3(gid ggggglgg gaggs'ilt thf,l . g*gp'"h %) I { gf N@*f+fg r fB T ?.t gigge h Q~W JMiB Piping and instrumentation diagrams X X X (P&lDs) Vortfy that the current configuration is consistent with the licensing bases at the X X level of detail contained in piping isometric l drawings ! Vedfy that the current configuration is consistent with the licensing bases at the X X level of detail contained in electrical single-line '6aarams Vedfy that the current configuration is consistent with the licensing bases at the level of detail contained in emergency, X X X abnormal, and normal operating prar= %res. vertfy the licensing-bases information x contained in the uWed FSAR. Verify the licensing-bases infm X contained in docketed correspondence > Vertty the analyzed configuration is consistent with the current plant X X confityirabon j Vertfy equipmentlocation and N y numbers are as indicated on the P&lD Vertfy equipment name plate datais X consistent with design specificahons. Vertfy equipment name plate data is X consistent with analyses
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI-10 Revision 4 June 26,1998 PI41. DOC
j IwrrIRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHE(Tr MTS AND WORKBOOK Lo l AREA l es Oversight inspecuon Plan Actions i Verify that the locanon of pipe supports, snubbers, and other pipe restraints are X consistent with design specifications Verify that the location of pipe supports, . snubbers, and other pipe restraints are X consistent piping stress analyses. Verify that divisional separation of safety-related systems, stnctures and i components, seismic ll/l, and other t@ l addressed by the licensee's hazards X analyses are reflected in the current plant ! configurabon Modifications that appear to have been completed recently will be screened to X assure adequate documentation O 2 l 1 I i l l J
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
M - 11 Revision 4 M41. DOC June 26,1998 l 1
IWTI.TRTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIUN PI-81 j SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKIJSTS AND WORKBOOK O This workbook is comprised of the following:
- a. Activities Flow Chart
- b. Instructions
- c. Workbook Forms 4.0 REQUIRED INPUTS (Prerequisites) 4.1 Reauired from NNECo: ,
~ 1 l
- a. List ofModifications and Descriptions
- b. P&ID
- c. FSAR
- d. UFSAR
- e. Technical Specification
- f. Safety Evaluation Report (SER)
- g. Procedures
- h. Corrective Action Program Information and Data
- i. Selected System Documents such as:
('
- Elementaries
- Logics e ControlLoops e PhysicalDrawings
- Component Drawings e Specifications / Data Sheets
- System Description
- Design Base 4.2 Reauired from Tier 2 Review Team:
- a. CriticalDesign Characteristics 4.3 Reauired from Regulatory Review Team:
- a. Regulatory ReviewInput ;
- b. Commitments !
- c. Licensing Basis Evaluation Support 4.4 Reauired from Tier 3 Team l
- a. Summary ofNhTCo procedural process l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. - !
PI-12 Revision 4 FI 01. DOC June 26,1998 w______-____-___
r MILLSTONE UNrr2 . I SYSRFROJECTINSTRUC113N FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.0 PROCESS 5.0.1 Geneml L Each system will be reviewed in accordance with the work flow activities i, indicated in Exhibit 3-1 and in accordance with the associated system l instructions and documentation contained in this workbook. When the process l requires the use of a workbook form, the detailed direction will be provided l under the heading " FORMS." The pivcees description will only make mention of the need to complete the associated form. 5.0.2 SVSR Verification and Validation The ia==+ ion activities based on Independent Corrective Action Verification Program (ICVAP) requirements shown in Exlubit 3-1 will be implemented through the use of Generic Checklists, modified as -sary to provide System Specific CheMieta. The checklist is comprised of a series ofpreviously developed queries to guide the in==* ion. l Typical requirements and questions for a Specific Chemist are contained in the appropriate Checklist Instruction. Attachment A provides addrtional" detailed" level questions that the SLE may used in forn=l=+ing the system specific ,k iaWon requirements Additional questions will be added during the ineae+ian as circumstances warrant 5.0.3 Use of Site Team I The primary functions of the site team will be to provide system walkdown support, to provide daily document collection for the home office based review team and to assist the home office in obiddig or clarifying information. The site team is considered an extension of the home office review team. Communication between the site and home office review team is considered as intemal and will be treated in accordance with the project proced= os. 5.0.4 SVSRInstructions and Forms The in==+ ion process and the use of the checklists will be documented thrainghaA the use of Tier 1 Review Forms and concluded with the System Review Close-out (Form CO). The review will be damn =*ad in the various checklist instructions listed below which are part of this workbook. Instruction Iitic T1-CL-I-01 System Scope and Boundary Instructions
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI- 13 Revision 4
' PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
IwrtIRTONE UNrr 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01' SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK T1-CL-I-02 System Licensing Bases Current Design Instructions T1-CL-I-03 System Review Checklist Instructions T1-CL-I-04 System Corrective Action Checklist Instmetions l T1-CL-I-05 System Modification Summary Screening Instmetions l T1-CL-I-06 System Modification Summary Listing Instructions l T1-CL-I-07 System Modification Review Checklist Instmetions T1-CL-1-08 System Review Checklist Instructions - Operating Procedures ! T1-CL-I-09 System Review Checklist Instmetions - Testing Procedures T1-CL-I-10 . System Review Checklist Instructions - Walkdown T1-CL-I-CO System Review Close-out Instructions 5.0.5 Intarf=_c- with Other Tier /Ramd=*an Review Tamme The Tier 1 review team will receive inputs from the Regulatory Review and Tier l 2 review teams. This input will be used by the Tier 1 team in establishing the l current licensing and design bases for the Unit and to establish the critical l characteristics required of the system to support the accident analysis. A form ; I will be used by these groups for this purpose. Tier 1 SVSR uses this information, adds additional information as required and returns the form to the origir is group. The following outhnes the process for this interface:
- a. The SLE assigns an individual (OE) to be responsible for providing l information.
- b. The OE completes the form by providing the requested missingm' formation
- c. The OE signs, dates and returns the forms to the applicable group.
l 5.0.6 Review Boundaries A review of the system against licensing and design basis shall be performed l during Tier 1. The review willinclude (but not be limited to) mechanical, electrical, I&C, and civil / structural requirements such as calculations, analyses, assumptions, and conclusions. Appropriate design documents and data for the selected system and the system components shall be reviewed to the extent necessary to verify the selected system requirements l For repetitive, standard, or identical functional components the review will l , include a screening process to confirm that the components are repetitive and identical followed by validation of the licensing or design basis requirement using a component group process O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 14 Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
[ MILIETONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCI1 N FI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK
' 5.0.7 Initial Ar+inne
- After the systems are selected, the GLE in concert with the Deputy Project Director selects the responsible SLE's.
- The GLE in conjunction with the responsible SLE's and LE's selects the system review teams from the pool of SVSR team engin-s and specialists to best match the individual skill levels.
. The SLE assures that the team members have been indoctrinated in accordance with the Project Administrative Manual (PAM).
. The SLE selects an Origin =+ing Engin-(OE) for each Form and/or functional area to be reviewed. The SLE can function as both the OE and Approver ifindependent review is provided.
l l Q) l 0
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 15 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
I IwrtIATONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTISN PI.41 SVSR DEPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.1 Svetam Scone and Bonadarv , 5.1.1 Purpose I Document the review of system interfaces and the determination of system l boundary. i l 5.1.2 Prerequisites / Documents l l
- FSAR
- P&ID
~
i 5.1.3 Determine System Boundary Interfaces with, and portions of, other systems will be included within the boundary of the selected system to the extent they are m>===7 to support the functional requirements of the selected system. System boundaries may be defined at appropriate components that provide physical isolation, as long as the ! selected boundary does not split the cow.pcz. sat between systems. All passive l devices such as supports and restraints, within the system boundary are included within the scope ofthe SVSR. 1 The extent of support system boundaries for mach =ic( electrical, I&C, structural and piping are defined in PP-01 and included in the instruction for Instruction T1.CL-I-01. 5.1.3.1 Determine the system functional requirements ; 5.1.3.2 Review the simpli6ed P&ID prepared by Tier 2 team to assure the system boundary includes the critical portions shown on the Tier 2 drawing. 5.1.3.3 Review system boundary definition with the NRC and resolve differences prior to proraading NNECo may participate in the boundary review if the NRC determines their participation is required. 5.1.4 Complete and document the System Scope and Boundary using Workbook Fonn1. 5.1.5 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 16 ' Revision 4 PI41. DOC' June 26,1998 L
Iwur.rR10NE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.2 Determine Licensing Bases 5.2.1 Purpose Dacemant the listing ofLicensing Basis Requirements. 5.2.2 Prerequisites / Documents:
- The Current FSAR(A_mandmant #48) e The Current Technical Specifications e The Current Aeddant Analysis Calculations .
- Regulatory Review TeamInput
- Critical Design Characteristics-(Tier 2) 5.2.3 The OE, review team and specialists review the current revision of the FSAR and docketed correspondence, license amendments, and technical specification made since the initial operating license to determine the current licensing bases for the selected system; doenmanting the results using Workbook Form 2.
7 5.2.4 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. T i O
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 17 Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-41 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECEIJS13 AND WORKBOOK 5.3 Pranare Svatam Snach ChacHe</Ra_mdrenwnte 5.3.1 Purpose Provide a mechanian for the revision of the generic checklists into speci6c l system and supporting system related review checklists that are (1) in agreement l with the boundary definition and (2) allow for a systematic review and assessment of charHet requirements. l 5.3.2 Prerequisites /Documants
- a. List ofModifications and Other Formal Documented Changes (including l proposed, in process, teiiiper.iy, implamantad canceled) l b List ofCorrective Actions i c. Boundary Definition
- d. List ofProcedures l 5.3.3 The SLE in concert with the LE, review team and specialists reviews the system modi 6 cations, licensing bases, NNECo Corrective Action Program, and NRC l
Order together with the typical review questions contained in the appropriate instruction in this workbook. Based upon these reviews the team revise the l generic clwrMats into specific system and supporting system checklists. The following checklists will be customized based upon this review: l l a. Corrective ActionModi6cstions
- b. DesignInput and Licensing Basis
- c. Component Data Sheets
- d. Modifications
- e. Operating Procedures
- f. Testing and Maintenance Procedures
- g. Walkdowns i
O
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI.18 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26.1998 l_ L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
IWIIHTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK 5.4 System Review 5.4.1 Purpose Document and verify that the selected system complies with the current unit Licensing and Design Basis requirements. 5.4.2 Prerequisitehimaata e Design Specifications e DesignInput Documents , e System Scope and Boundary Domman*** ion e Critical Design Characteristics Domman*=* ion e OriginalDesign Specifications e ICAVP Regulatory Requirements / Commitments Documentation
. List of A/E Identified Design Deficiencies Issued at Initial Startup e Performance Calm 1= dons
. Technical Specifications e FSAR e Applicable Codes, Standards, and Ra=>1=+ory Guides e Acdd-* Analysis Calculations e Equipment Specifications e Instrument Setpoint/ Calculations e Design Guides / Design Standards etc. prepared by or for NNECo e Design Basis Dom ==*=+ ion as defined by NNECo e Inventory of System Components 5.4.3 The OE in concert with reviewers from other disciplines completes the checklist and reviews each requirement at the system level in accordance with the System Review Checklist (Form 3 Part C).
5.4.4 The OE assigned to a component completes the component data sheets obtaining input from other disciplines or specialists as required (Form 3 Part X). Per discussion with the NRC on June 11,1998, the decision was made to limit the scope of the I&C review for the non-safety related Instrument Component l Datasheets. The non-safety classification is applicable to those instrument I component loops that are designated as non-safety related.* The revised extent of the in-scope review only examines the critical attritxites associated with the
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 19 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MHIS'IONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTEN FI-41 SYSRIlWLEMENTATION CHECEIJSTS AND WORKBOOK instrument loop's: pressure boundary, design parameters / conditions, classification, and isolation. The review of these attnbutes assures that critical interfaces witl4 safety related systems or component devices is not compromised. Only the following questions need to be addressed on the abridged, non-safety related Form 3-X Component Datasheets: Part A System Component Data Questions Numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8,10, and 11 Part B Stmw. y ofComponent Loop Part C Component AttributeReview QuestionsNumbered 1,2,3,10,14,25,32c,33,37,38,42 and 62
- This inchutan instrument cew-:r+1 loops whose function has been designated as safety related, however, its sole safety function is maintaining the pressure boundary.
Note: All other questions are to be marked "N/A" on the Form 3X_ICXX form. 5.4.5 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibihty is indicated on the chaciclist for that particular , i requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and ir ;o.yorating the inputs ofothers 5.4.6 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l l
- Perseas Power Group Inc. -
PI-20 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC hoe 26,1998
MHJXIONE UlHT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIUN FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECEIJSTa AND WOREBOOK 5.5 ProgrammaticfTopicalReview 5.5.1 Purpose D~===t and verify the correct application of the applicable programmatic / topical areas as part of the selected system level review. 5.5.2 Each of the selected systems will be reviewed with respect to the following NNECo progrewr.stic/ topical areas:
. Anticipa+M Transients Without SCRAM (ATWS)
~
e ControlRoom Design Review 1
. Environmental Quahfication ofElectrical Equipment (EQ) e Erosion / Corrosion e ExternalEvents/ Hazards e
Generic Letter 89-10 (MOV) e Heavy Loads e High and Moderate Energy Line Breaks (HELB/MELB) e InserviceInspection e Inservice Testing /10 CFR50 Appendix J Testing
- IPEEE
-o Master Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) e Regulatory Guide 1.97 Compliance e Separation /Indq=adm> Diversity e Set Point Control e Single Failure e Station Blackout
. 10 CFR50 Appendix R e USI A-46 Seismic Qualification 5.5.3 Each program / topic is addressed by a separate Part of the System Review Checkhst. The OE prepares the checklist and reviews each requirement at the system level in accordance with the program being reviewed (Form 3 Parts E through W).
l 5.5.4 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group
- assigned this responsibility is indic=+M on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating the inputs ofothers-5.5.5 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals.
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI-21 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
lWHJRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI3N FI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECEIJS13 AND WORKBOOK 5,6 ' Corrective Action CMiin 5.6.I Purpose 1 l Document the review and assessment ofproposed and implemented corrective actions for design deficiencies identified by NNECo durmg the implementation of the Configuration Management Corrective Action Program. j Provide review of the NNECo Correction Actions Program (CAP) identi6ed in Adverse Condition Reports (ACR), Condition Reports (CR), Unresolved Items Reports (UIR) and Final Safety Analysis Report Change Requests (FSARCR).
~
5.6.2 Prerequisites / Documents
- a. NRC Signi6 cant Items List
- b. NNECo Corrective Action Plan / List 5.6.3 The OE, review team and spM= lies review the system specific NNECo Corrective Actions and documents the results using the System Corrective l Action Checkhst Fonn 4.
l '5.6.4 The SLE may elect to assign speci6c checklist requirements to specialists or l othar discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is iaAcat~i on the checklist for that particular requirement The OE retains responsihhty for completing the review and incorporating theinputs ofothers 5.6.5 Prepare a separate Checklist for each corrective action being reviewed. ! 5.6.6 Obtain interfacing aign= ares and approvals. l 1 l l i i l 0
- Panons Power Group Inc. - 1 PI- 22 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 <
wrtn10NE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTEN FI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHEfTYETS AND WORKBOOK 5.7 Modification Screening Review 5.7.1 Purpose Provide a mehanism to screen system modifications and to identify those modifications that do not effect the licensing or design basis of the unit. HDID Form 5 will not be required to be completed effective 1/19/98. All modifications identified for the selected systems for which an initial screening has not been completed will be reviewed mitiriag the Form 7 process. For those modifications for which a Fonn 5 has been done it will be noted in Form 6 that the Form 5 screening has been completed. 5.7.2 Prerequisites / Documents e List ofNNECo modifications and ="='ai descriptions 5.7.3 Using the Unit's modification lists and descriptions, the OE determines which modifications are applicable to the system being reviewed, and lists all applicable modifications including those that have been canceled or in process. 5.7.4 The OE, review team and spei=H*s review the list of system modifications and perform modification screening; don =- ..... g the results using Workbook Form
- 5. Modification screening is performed to identify minor modifications that do not effect thelicensing basis.
5.7.5 The OE completes a modification screening form (Form 5) for each applicable system modification. 5.7.6 Any modification that passes the screening questions will be reviewed in accordance with the system specific modification checklist. Modifications that are in process or canceled also will be screened and summarized Workbook Form 6 is used to summarize the applicable modifications to be used for the detail review. 5.7.7 Request a copy of each modification package contained in the Modification Listing Summary fromNNECo. 5.7.8 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l O l l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
M- 23
- Revision 4 FI01. DOC June 26,1998 f.
- - _ - - - - - 1
IWYrJRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIUN PI-41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISIS AND WORKBOOK 5.8 System Modification Review 5.8.1 Purpose Provide a mechanism for the systematic review and assessment of modifications contained in the Modification Summary Listing for the subject system to verify the maintenance of configuration control since the initial operating licerse. 5.8.2 Modifications may include any of the following types ofNNECo documents:
- Design Change Records Minor Modifications
- Maintenance Support Engirwaring Evaluations
- Setpoint Change Records I
- Item Equivalency Evaluations (formerly Replacement Item Evaluations) i 5.8.3 Prerequisites / Documents
- List ofModifications (Proposed, implemented, canceled, tonyorary)
- Design ControlProcedures
- Copies ofModifications and all Change Attachmaat=
l
- Program / Topical Area Applicability 5.8.4 The OE prepares the checklist and reviews each modification contained in the System Modification Summary Listing, (Form 6) in accordance with the System Modification Review Checklist (Form 7).
5.8.5 - The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to specialists or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and i incorporating theinputs of others. 5.8.6 Prepare a separate Modification Checklist for each modification bemg reviewed. 5.8.7 Based upon system modification review, the OE marks up a copy of the P&ID to l indicate which portions of the system have been changed by the modification. The modification number is included next to the marked-up portion of the P&ID associated with the modification. When the P&ID review is completed it is l forwarded to the SLE. 5.8.8 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 24 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
1 I I IWit.sRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.9 - Oneretine Praminres Review 5.9.1 Purpose Provide a process for the systematic review and assessment of the system related operating and maintenance procedures. 5.9.2 Prerequisites / Documents
- Operating Procedures ,
- Abnormal Operation Procedures e Emergency Procedures e AlarmResponse Procedures
- Maintenance Procedures e Pre , Post-Operating Testing Procedures I e Operations CriticalDiagrams e Functional / Logic Diagrams
. Input from Modi 6 cation Reviews O 5.9.3 ' The OE prepares the checidist and reviews the applicable operating and !
emergency procedures ==aM=+~i with the applicable system to verify that i applicable modifications are resected in the current operating procedures; l dennanting the results in accordance with the specific Procedure Review Checklist (Fonn 8). 5.9.4 The Procedures Lead hgir=ar assures the input required to complete the system and component level checklists (Form 3 Part C and X) is provided. 5.9.5 The Procedures Lead hginaar consults with the SLE to assure that the operating procedures do not permit operation in an unanalyzed condition. 5.9.6 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to a specialist or other discipline individuals =%=nari to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibihty is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating theinputs ofothers. 5.9.7 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 25 Revision 4 FI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MII1 STONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.10 Training and Testinn Review 5.10.1 Purpose Provide a process for the systematic review and assessment of trainmg and testing requirements for the selected system by evaluating:
- Training Procedures e Test Acceptance Criteria and Basis e Testing Conditions, and System Boundary Considerations
- Test Performance and Documentation e Post Testing Review and Evaluation 5.10.2 Prerequisites / Documents e Training Procedures
- Pre-Operation Test Procedures e Pre-Operation Test Results e Maintenance Tests e Maintenance Test Results
- Surveillance Testing Procedures
- Surveillmce Testing Results
- Calculations related to testing
- Completed Critical Function Checklist
- Input from Modi 6 cation Reviews 5.10.3 The OE prepares the checklist and reviews the applicable training and test procedures associated with the applicable system to verify that applicable modifications are reflected in the current operating procedures; documenting the ,
results in accordance with the System Specific Test Review Checklist (Form 9). 5.10.4 The Testing Lead Engineer assures the input required to complete the system and component level checklists (Form 3 Part C and X) is provided. 5.10.5 The SLE may elect to assign speci6c checklist requirements to a specialist or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the roiew and O incorporating the inputs of others.
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-26 Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
MILISTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O 5.10.6 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. \ 3 O l l 0
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI- 27 Revision 4 FI41E June 26,1998
MTIIRTONE UNIT 2 l SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCIlON PI-01 l SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKIJSTS AND WORKBOOK . O Q 5.11 As Built (Walkdown) Review 5.11.1 Purpose Provide a process for the systematic identi6 cation of requirements for system walkdowns to verify the physical plant m ' stallation, primary drawing information, and the implementation of the configuration management program 5.11.2 Prerequisites / Documents
- P& ids
. Piping Physical Drawings (Isometrics)
- One Line Diagrams
- Elementaries
- Instrument Loop Drawings
. Instrument Installation Drawings e Speci6 cations e Requirements / Commitments List from other Primary Checklists and Discipline Checklist Requiring Verification 5.11.3 The OE prepares the checklist and verifies the existing plant physical arrangement associated with the applicable system to verify that as built condition match the current plant design documentation; documenting the results in accordance with the System Specific Walkdown Review Checklist (Form 10). The OE will modify this checklist as the review progresses based upon home office review teaminput.
5.11.4 The SLE may elect to assign specific checklist requirements to specialist or other discipline individuals assigned to the system review team. The group assigned this responsibility is indicated on the checklist for that particular requirement. The OE retains responsibility for completing the review and incorporating the inputs ofothers. 5.11.5 Obtain interfacing signatures and approvals. l fs l I
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
M- 28 Revision 4 PI01 DOC June 26,1998
l l Mir.1RTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCT12N PI-41 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.12 Tier 1 SVSR Review Close-out l l 5.12.1 The SLE is responsible to verify that all items and reviews required by the NRC i Order have been completed by the system review team and completes the Tier 1 l System Review Close-out (Form CO). 5.12.2 The SVSR GLE and Deputy Project Director approve that the system review is j ! completed. 1 { l i 1 1 O l I l l
\
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-29 Revision 4 FI41M June 26.1998
IwYrIRTONE UNrr 2 SYS3FROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 5.13 ICAVP Report 1 Prepare Tier 1 input to the final ICAVP report in accordance with the format and direction from the Project Director. l O 1 l l l I l 1 e
- Perseas Power Group Inc. -
M . 30
- Revision 4 M41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 l SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK N 6.0 WORKBOOK FORMS After the system specific checklists are prepared the workbook will be comprised of the appropriate forms including a System Review Close-out Checklist. The ' purpose of this section is to provide instructions for the completion of the - workbook forms. The forms are assembled using the sequence number on the lower right hand corner of each form. 6.1 General 6.1.1 Form Document Identification shall have the following famiat: [ Form Type}4NNECo System Alpha ID) - [ Parsons Unique Number] For example: LBCD-MS-01 Licensing Bases Current Design for Main Steam System RC-CA-MS-01 Corrective Action Checklist for Main Steam System Parsons' Form Document Identification starts at 01. Each form will have the documentID filled out. O () 6.1.2 The OE(s) reviews NNECo documents to the level required to answer a specific requirement and/or question. The forms may be used to document the depth of the review and the reference source (s). 6.1.3 The interface reviewers and specialists review the OE's response (s) only to the i level required to assure that the requirement and/or question is satisfactorily i dispositioned. i l 6.1.4 Interface Review and Approval 6.1.4.1 When the review is completed, the OE presents the completed form including any supplemental documents to each of the discipline reviewers and or specialists. 6.1.4.2 The OE resolves any interface review comments. 6.1.4.3 The discipline leads and or specialist sign and date in Part A to indicate their interface review is completed. 6.1.4.4 The OE presents the completed form to the SVSR SLE and GLE for approval. p( 6.1.4.5 The OE resolves any Approver comments and reviews these with the interface reviewers to assure that the change will not impact their reviews.
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
PI-31 Revision 4 PI 01. DOC June 26,1998
-]
l MIT.IRTONE UhTT 2 ' SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SVSR BfPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O 6.1.4.6 The SVSR SLE and GLE sign and date Part A to indicate their approval. The form is considered completed after obtaining the required Approval signatures. 6.1.5 Form Revision 6.1.5.1 After a forrn has been apnroved further changes will be via revision. Each revision will be noted with a revision bar and the change noted. 6.1.5.2 Review and approval requires the same process as indicated above. l l l l l i - O l
- Parsees Power Group Inc. -
FI-32 Revision 4 l PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 l
I MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIEN PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O I l T1-CL-I-01 . 1 SYSTEM SCOPE AND BOUNDARY INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 1 O Sinnature D.A.tf Prepared: - 4 27 9P Reviewed: .
/ 4/ 9!97 Approved: /MT 4 9[
Approved: 7adrN98 Deputy Project Duector I l O l
)
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
l PI-33 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998 l l
Mif.IATONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-0I l SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK , (g l 3 1.0 FORM 1 - SYSTEM SCOPE AND BOUNDARY 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:
. Derme all the selected system interfaces
- Define the inspection limit of supporting systems 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, j system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE.
1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision blockin Part A. 1.4 Limit ofReview Boundaries Interface with, and portions of; other systems will be included within the boundary of the selected system to the extent they are necessary to support the functional requirements of the selected system. System boundaries may be defmed at appropriate components that provide physical isolation, as long as the selected boundary does not split the component between systems. Allpassive devices such as support and restraints, within the system boundary are included within the scope of the SVSR. , 1.4.1 Support system boundaries will be limited to: 1.4.1.1 Mechanical The boundary is extended to the first level of support system interface. As an example, at a heat exchanger, the interface will be verified at the level of data associated with the temperature and flow rate of the cooling media. The interfacing system equipment / data / design will be verified to the extent that the I input parameters can be validated with respect to a verified calculation or l vendor document, l 1.4.1.2 Electrical Electrical power will be verified from the actuating component or power supply l to the ultimate on site source required for the component to perform its intended function. All selected system loads and their design parameters will be verified. Verification will focus on the review ofloads associated with the selected ; system. Design documents will be reviewed to the level confirming that the intended function can be accomplished. O V
- Parsons Power Group inc. -
FI.34 w-PI-01. DOC June io, h,2
l
- l. lWIIIATONEUNrf 2 l SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-01 l SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK 1.4.1.3 Instrumentation and Control
{ I&C will be verified from the individual field sensor to the component or device required to perform an intended function. Verification will include any portion of the instrument loop, power supplies, circuitry, interfacing hardware and range / set point required to assure the intended function is accomplished. The i SVSR will concentrate on verifying (1) signals as#M with the selected system and (2) that the instrument loop performs its primary function. Design ; I documents reviewed will be reviewed to the level of confirming that the intended function can be accomplished. 1.4.1.4 Pjoing - 4 l l Will be reviewed to the point ofinterface with the component and/or supporting structures. j 1.4.1.5 Structural Supporting structures will not be considered within the system boundary. l 1.5 Using the applicable NNECo domuns=* the OE completes Part B of the form. 1.5.1 For each interface indicated, the extent of the boundary is to be included. The boundary shall be consistent with Section 1.4 l 1.6 The OE will count the number of pages and enter the appropriate total in the header box of the form. i' 1.7 The OE submits the form and checidist to the interface reviewers in accordance with the GeneralInstructions for Review and Approvalin Section 6.0 of this l document. 1 i i l
- Perseas Power Group Inc. - i PI-35 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ u
DOCUMENTID: SSBD - Page 1 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM SCOPE C BOUNDARY DEFINITION Responsible Engmeer
.-__-_-__-_..._.M __-_-_ _
PART A BOUNDARYINTERFACE SIGN OFF l REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 as man em sissmun.no sp
- 1. ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - - -
Machanical Lead ElectricalLead Control Systems Lead Pipmg/StructmulLead opentions Engmeer Proceduree Fnginaer l Testing Engmeer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
System Lead Fngs,aer
" ' " ~
1O PART B SYSTEM BOUNDARY DEFINITION Instructions: (1) Provide a brief desedption of the of the system, highlighting major features, systems functions, and all system interfaces (mechanical, electrical, IAC, etc.) (2) "Ibe boundary should be described for each interfacing plaat systeen (mechaalcal, electrical, or IAC), structure and functional work group (mechanical, procedures, programs, etc.).
- 1. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION:
l l
- 2. SYSTEM FUNCTIONS: j a.
- 3. SUPPORTING SYSTEM (S) INTERFACES:
(Interfaces are to be described fully so thet the extent of the boundary (rwiew) is clearly understood). IJst each applicable functional gesup separately. A.1 Mechaalcal l
- Farsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 01 I 1 Package Sequence No. 2 l Revision 2 F1.,SSBDB. DOC 9/23/97
DOCUMENTID: SSID - Page 2 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM SCOPE & BOUNDARY DEFINITION Respmsible Engmeer (system TeamImd) A.2 Mechanical Extent v Boundary 1. B.1 Elging 1. B.2 hainst Extent of Boundan 1. C.1 Stmetural 1. C.2 Stmetural Estest of Boundary 1. (~ - D1 Rlectrical 1. D.2 Electrical Estent of Bmandary
- 1. l I
E.1 Instrumentatice and Costal 1. E.2 Instrumcatetion and Control Extent of Boundary 1. J F.1 ED!tedures 1. F.2 Procedures Extent of Boundg_rr 1. 1 i G.1 Testier 1. t
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 01 I-41-2 Package Sequence No. 2 ( F1,,SSBDB. DOC Revision 2 9/23/97
DOCUMENTID: SS"D - Page 3 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM SCOPE & BOUNDARY DEFINITION Responsible Engmeer (System Team Lead) G.2 TestiaLEIlestdEcus_ dan 1. El Prograuss 1. IL2 Programas Extent of Boundary 1. L1 gggr 1. L2 Other Extent of Boundary 1. O . O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - r FORM: 01 f I 3 Package Sequence No. 2 Revision 2 F1.,SSBDB. DOC 9/23/97
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKIlSTS AND WORKBOOK O T1-CL-I-02 . SYSTEM LICENSING BASES CURRENT DESIGN LISTING INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 2 O Sinnature D3tc Prepared: -[ ^ 429-99 Reviewed: '
=> 6- A9 77 !
Approved: 4[M 4cSC-ff Approved: A ~Joc )p#f 8 I*putyIwat Du= tor lO
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
PI-36 Revision 4 c FMI. DOC June 26,1998
MILIJ!iTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIEN PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CRECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 2. _SYSTEMIJCENSING BASES CURRENTEESIGN 1.1 The purpose ofthis formis to:
- Obtain the selected system's current licensing basis
. Obtain docketed NNECo licensing commitments to bulletin, orders, etc.
. Document the results to allow comparison of the current system design condition 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE.
1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision blockin Part A. 1.4 Using the applicable NNECo documents, the OE completes Part B of the form. Note: Only the current UFSAR and docketed licensing commitments are to be included. Input on NNECo licensing commitments contained in docketed material shall be provided by the Regulatory Review group as described in Project Procedure PP-04. 1.4.1 The licensing requirement should be described in sufficient detail Wordy paragraphs are to be used only ifrequired As an example:
- The required service water design flow is 2500 GPM.
- The RWST accident volume is 350,000 Gallons.
1.5 The OE will count the number of pages and enters the appropriate total in the header box of the form. l 1.6 The OE submits the form and checklist to the interface reviewers in accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document. l i I r O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 37 Revision 4 ! PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 :
DOCUMENTID: LBCD- Page 1 ofxx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O
~
ICivF svsR svsrEu: LICENSING BASES - CURRENT P REVISION XX OF FSAR ME"ieTnd PARTA LICENSING BASES (CURRENT thru FSAR, Rev. XX) INTERFACE SIGN OFF REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 em em e L ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - - -
}/erhanical JAnd Electrical Lead Control Systemslead Pipag/StructuralLead operations Engmeer Iin* Engmeer Testing Fnpnaer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
SystemIeed Fnpneer SVSRIend Fnenaer PART B SYSTEM CURRENT LICENSING BASES Instructions: Revisies xx of the FSAR mad other licensing comanisments will be used to determine the curmet systema licensing basis. For each bases, enter the requiressent and the reference section and page, llagt IJcensine Raouirement Refersace - Section & Pare 1. 2. 3. 4. l l l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 02 4 I 1 Package Sequence Na 3 Revision 2 F2_LBCB. DOC 9/23/97 (
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O T1-CL-I-03 SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS
# "" 3 O
Signature Dgg l l Prepared: # 4.E7 P Reviewed: j 29 98 Approved: /_!47T f 730- 9[ i Approved: Iod F# f 8 Deputy Project Director
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-38 Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI el SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK ( 1.0 FORM 3 - SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKIlST 1.1 The purpose of this form is to:
. Compare the current system design documentation (including all modifications) to the current system licensing and design basis -
. Provide a review of current program / topical areas
. Verify that system components satisfy their current licens'mg and design basis 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE.
1.3 Upon initiaticn of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision blockin Part A. 1.4 The SLE in concert with the LE will review the speci6c checklist requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) discipline, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Parts C, E.1 through W,1, and X, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer / inspector's name to each specific checklist requirement. 1.5 System /Programfropical Summary (Part B.2) 1.5.1 The OE summarizes the results of the program / topical area review perfonned in . Parts E through W and provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions l in Part B.2, signs and dates to indicate that applicable programs were considered in the design basis. i 1.5.2 If any program / topical area is determined to not be considered, the OE indicates I l the program / topical area name, indicates and veri 6es that it is dispositioned as a discrepancy, signs and dates Item 2 ofPart B.2. 1.6 System Checklist Requirements (Part C) 1.6.1 Using the FSAR and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) and/or specialist completes Part C of the Checklist following any additional instruction included in Part C. l 1.6.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided. 1.6.3 The checklist requirement result should be described in sufBcient detail. The OE/mspector determines the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be
} used onlyifrequired.
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-39 Revision 4 PI01. DOC June 26,1998 l
MILLSTONE UNrf 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHErTTMTS AND WORKBOOK O 1.6.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part C, signs and dates the specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirements complete. 1.7 Programfropical Area Screening Requirements (Parts E to W) Each program / topical area is screened to determine its applicability to the selected system. 1.7.1 The assigned inspector /OE completes the screening questions in Pans E through W and detennines that the program / topical area was censidered and its applicability to the system. 1.7.~2 The OE and appropriate pugrein/ topical specialist provide disposition in accordance with the instructions, sign and date the form. These signatures indicate that the disposition of the system is correct. 1.8 Program / Topical Area Checklist Requirements (Part E.1 through W.1) - 1.8.1 Using the FSAR and other NNECo input hmante as applicable, the OE(s) and/or spaci= Hat completes Parts E.1 through W.1 of the Chachat following any additional instruction included in each Part. 1.8.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided. 1.8.3 - The checklist requirement result should be described in sufficient detail. The OE/mWor determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used onlyifrequired. 1.8.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under Item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in each Part, signs and dates the speci6c requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inapac* ion of this requirement is complete. I 1.9 Component Data Verification 1.9.1 The OE adds the Parsons Power Daenman+ ID number, component tag number, NNECO system code, component description to the form header and indicates the responsible SLE. Repetitive or functionally sinstar components may be
- F r r c, o -
, , , PI-40 Revision 4 L. . n - P101. DOC June 26,1998
p L un.tRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCI10N FI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK grouped on the same data sheet. Each non-repetitive component requires a separate form and Document ID number. 1.9.2 Upon initiation ofPart X, the OE/ review inspector signs and dates the appropriate revision block. 1.9.3 The OE/ review inspector completes (Part X) by completing the component data checklist. 1.9.4 If the component data chaMint is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided. 1.9.5 Upon completion of connpanaat data checklist, the assigned i==aantor checks the appropriate blocks under Item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in l accordance with the instructions in Part X, signs and dates the speciSc form. l This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete. 1.9.6 The OE submits the Part X checklist for review and approval in accordance with General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document 1.10 The OE for Form 3 assures all the reviewer /iamaantor inputs are included for l- each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector l signature, and (3) date. The OE counts the number of pages and enters the l appropriate total in the header box of the form. 1.11 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Paits C and E through X that are dispositioned as a . " Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B.1 by providing a summary l disposition, indicating any dim 9.cy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the form. 1.12 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in accordance with the GeneralInstructions for Review and Approvalin Section 6.0 of this document 2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS l 2.1 The questions in the following sections are to be considered in the development 1 of the specific checklist questions to be incorporated on the appropriate fonn. These questions are based upon the NRC Order, Oversight Plans, and SSFI/IDI J procedures. j O l l
- Parsons Power Group lac. -
PI- 41 Revision 4 l PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
( MIIIRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI el SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 2,2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will revise these questions to generate the system speci6c review requirements for the l selected system. 2.3 hased upon the system selected, the review team will detemune what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook. l l l t lO l l l l l
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI-42 Revision 4 FI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. The system is reviewed using the following checklist and the results recorded on Form 3. l
- 2. The System Lead Engineer shall revise the following questions as needed in l preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
- 3. The SLE reviews the following questions, expanding or deleting them as required, l and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
l Note: these questions are customized for each selected system and do not require l the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system. p 4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist questions contained in the system y/ review checklist or Appendix A.
- 5. If the selected system does not have a design input use Exhibit I-03-1 to prepare a l designinput checklist. j l
A. PENTIFICATION OF DESIGN INPUTS AND REOUIREMEhTS l e Does a design input exist for the system? Ifyes, use the designm ' put evaluation checklist. 4 If no, prepare a design input checklist (only the response to the questions need to be filled out). The system will be reviewed against this checklist. Exhibit I-03-1 is a sample design input check. B. DESIGNINPUTEVALUATION
. Are applicable Codes, Standards and Regulatory Guides referenced in the Calculations and Specifications?
e Verify that the calculations and specifications support the licensing basis as defined in Fonn 2.
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI-43 Revision 4 FI.01. DOC June 26,199s
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION FI41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK e If the design was based on assumptions are these assumptions still valid? e Does the design basis i . formation, as used by NNECo, have sufEcient technical guidance for engineers to perform assigned functions? ; e Is the design basis information retrievable, adequately controlled, and revised as required to reflect changes to the Design Basis? 3 C. CALCULATIONS AND MEASUREMENTS e Do the calculations conform to the design inputs? e Are all assumptions used in the calculations technically sound? l
- Verify that the system design / performance calculation results envelope any performance requirements or maximum flows used or assumed in the Chapter 14 Accident Analysis. Where more than one flow path aligamaat is used for the system each align = ant should be checked
- Are appropriate margins used for establishing the design basis of equipment?
e Were system calculations and analysis performed using recognized acceptable methods? e Are the results of the calculations reasonable and consistent with the design input? O . Are the calculations performed and verified in accordance with the applicable Design Control procedures? e Is data in the FSAR consistent with the plant design calculations and analysis? e Do the system calculations / analysis reflect the current plant configuration, Licensed Power Rating and operation? e Do the design calculations for the interfacing system use the correct value for the design value for the design flow to or from the system? D. OTHER CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT MEASUREMENTS
- Do NNECo's Design Guides / Standards, etc. provide sufBeient technical guidance forRagi= ing?
e Verify the seismic classification of those components and portions of a system 1 that perfonn a critical function. I e Vesify that non-safety portions of the system are isolated by automatic valves irW single failure criteria or that calculations are available demonstrating 1 that any loss of flow to the non-safety branch will not effect the required ; operation. N
- Do system aligamantm and plant configurations defined in plant procedures comply with analyzed conditions? l
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
M- 44 Revision 4 H 01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSRiMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Does a fuse control program exist that provides the n-aaery guidance for inoperly storing and logging fuses for both safety and non-safety applications, and provide criteria for hmadung fuse issues, identifying causes of fuse failure, detansig the proper replacement fuse and identifying and updating all j affected plant documentation? e Is or was the temporary change, jumper, hfted lead, and by-pass control process used as part of the permanent moddication or change process? e Has the permanent moddication or change been completed and the temporary j change, jumper, lifted lead, and/or by-pass removed? e Does the temporary change conform to the FSAR commitments? e Was a safety evaluation prepared for the temporary change? !
- Were drawings, procedures, etc., requiring revision noted in the temporary charge?
E. MECHANICAL 1 e Are the design pressure and temperature correctly selected in accordance with l the applicable piping code? t
. Are the system design conditions correctly stated in the Procurement Speci6 cations and any ASME Design Specifications?
l hm e Have the code requirements for overpressure protection been correctly applied in the design? ! e Review valves and orifices in the systems for operating conditions with excessive (hahing or cavitation) pressure drops. !
- Review the pipe size and flow in the system for Excessive fluid system velocities (erosion).
- Do Valve, Flanges and other piping system components have adequate l Pressure-temperature ratings?
l l
- Control valve operating conditions are bounded by procurement Specifications or valve vendors as-mmanfac+nred data.
l
- Checit required (as-buik) heat exchanger duty with design requirements.
l
- Review Seismic qualification data for operability of active components.
- Has minimum flow protection been provided for pumps that are subject to operation at zero or reduced flow?
- Is there adequate isolation valving provided in any cross connections between redundant fluid trains?
e Are piping code / code class boundaries clearly identified and correctly applied to the system? I - Persons Power Group Inc. - PI.45 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
IW11JRTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-01 SYSRIMPLElWENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK j e Does the design provide instrumentation for performance testing and monitoring? e Has the design considered the potential transient fluid loadings which may ! occurin the system? e Has adequate NPSH been provided for pumps under all operating conditions and alienmenta? e Have the effects of pipe whip, jets and floodmg been considered in the design? F. CIVIL. STRUCTURAL AND PIPING ANALYSIS
- Does the piping analysis use the correct system configuration, piping material and design pressure / temperature?
e Review piping supports for adequate capacity for piping reaction loads. l e Has the piping analysis considered any applicable post-accident environmental temperatures that the system may be exposed to and which may exceed the normal piping design temperature? e Are the design loads, load combinations and allowable values correctly selected l in accordance with the applicable codes? p e Review applicability of floor response spectra and equipman* damping values i for piping analyses, pipe supports, conduit and cable tray supports, tubing design and seismic equipment qualification.
- Has the correct seismic input been used in the vendor documentation for j seismic qualification of electrical and mechanical equipment?
e Were the design calculations for the generic conduit and cable tray supports j i performed by using accW methods? e Does the seismic qualification of electrical cabinets and I&C panels and racks ; address structural evaluation ofhost cab'met, cabinet anchorage, housed components and component ==nting details? e- Does the number of modes used in the dynamic analyses capture about 90% of the total mass? If-a y, review how the effects ofmissing mass are l included in the analyses.
- Do the dynamic analyses consider three-directional earthquakes where the l vertical earthquake response is combined with the larger horizontal earthquake l response?
e Are the relative movements between the structures correctly considered in the structural / piping calculations? e Were the material properties correctly adjusted for high temperatures?
- O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-46 Revision 4 l PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
1 Iwrr.I ATONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIEN PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKIJSTS AND WORKBOOK i G. ELECTRICAL e Are the AC and DC electrical systems design basesrmputs ie19ding applicable codes, standards, criteria and regulatory requirements identified? e Are the AC and DC electrical systems design basesrmputs complete and adequate to define the design base? e Are the AC, DC and EDG design base calculations and analy:,es identified? e Were the electrical system design base calculations and analyses perfonned using organized and accepted Mhade? e Are the assumptions used in the system calculations or analyses tehnica_Hy sound and do they consider all operational modes and conditions that the AC or DC systems or components or EDG will experience? e Are the calculations or analyses results consistent with the design inputs? e Do the design base electrical calculations identify available margins? e Are the AC and DC one line diagrams consistent with the supporting analyses? e Do the electrical calculations and analyses support the 13 ting of major safety related equipment / components including but not lirrdted to:
- EDG's e medium voltage switchgear l
- low voltage switchgear l
- power center transformers e batteries and chargers e inverters e distribution panels e motor control centers e cables I e electrical penetrations e Do the AC and DC calculations and analyses represent the current plant configuration?
e Is the AC or DC electric power system capable of providing the required ' power as needed by each component in the system. That is, required voltage, frequency, current maximum and minimums at steady state and transient conditions? e Can the required power quality be provided for the needed time? e Do the system component controls meet the design requirements including disconnection from the bus, if required, and load sequencing in the required time?
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
PI-47 ' Revision 4 PM1. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Has the distribution system been adequately designed with regard to cabling, breaker sizes, and coordination? e Is safety-grade 1E electrical power and control signals provided to critical components? e Are the components qualified to perform their safety function in the environment that they will experience? e Does the component physical arrangement meet requirements such as separation, shielding, barriers, etc. to ensure that single failures do not prevent the system from performing its safety function? e Do the environmental qualification test conditions conform to the predicted
~
conditions for thatlocation? e Is equipment performance specified for the worst accident in which the equipment will be required to perform?
. Do the equipment qualification test reports demonstrate qualification for the required conditions?
- Are the bases for the trip settings for protective devices including breaker, fuses and thermal overloads adequate to ensure performance of the safety function or protect the equipment in cases of overloads?
e Are the valve torque switch Waga valid and are the Wage tested? H. INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL
- Verify that the Instrumentation ardi Control design parameters envelope the anticipated nonnal, upset, and design process variables (pressure, temperature, flow) for the Fluid System design .
- Review the functional, wiring and installation drawings to assure conformance with the licensing and design basis, e Review Qualification documentation to determine ifit is in compliance with the licensing and design basis.?
e Review the alarms or annunciators for the system to determine if the set points and location of the annunciation are appropriate.
- Have any required provisions for operation of the System from a remote location for shutdown been included in the design.
- Verify that the Instrument and Control system detects and maintains es=*ial parameters during all plant conditions.
- Can the required detection and control functions be provided during a loss of offsite power or other anticipated conditions?
e Review the logic functions, interlocks, automatic actuation and other control functions required to assure that they are correctly implemented. e Have the as-built deviations in instrument tap locations and instrument O elevations been acm=*ad for in the set point calculations?
- Parsees Power Group Inc. -
PI-48 Revision 4 PI.01. DOC June 26,1998
MITJRTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK
- Have provisions been made at the control locations (Main Panel or local Panel) to indicate inoperable and bypassed status?
- Does the Instrument and Control design consider separation and redundancy requirements?
- For instrumentation that provides initiation or permissives for system operation verify the range, set point, and set point calculations are adequate.
- Has proper signalisolation been provided between safety and non-safety l relatedinterfaces?
I l
'v l
l l l I l
- Parson Power Group Inc. - l PI-49 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART E ANTICIPATED TRANSIENTS WITHOUT SCRAM CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INS'1 RUCTIONS
- 1. ATWS is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part E.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following auestions/ requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by theinspection team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific fonn in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. ATWS OUESTIONS F,OR SCREENING The following question will be used to screen the system for ATWS applicability. A yes answer will require more detailed review as defined in Section "B." Section A- ATWS Screening
- Does this system support plant response to an ATWS event as desented in paragraph (b) of 10CFR50.62 and MNPS-2 FSAR Section 7.9? If yes:
Section B - ATWS The following questions should be answered for each system:
- How is this system credited in response to the event? I
- Does this system function wholly or in part to initiate AFW or a tmtine trip in response to an ATWS7
- Does this system function wholly or in part as a means diverse from the RTS to intenupt power to the control elements, in response to an ATWS?
O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-50 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MIT.T 5 STONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART F CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Control Room Design Review is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part F.
- 2. The System Leid Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utihzed by the inspection team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable O to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW The following question will be used to screen the system for Control Room Design Review applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B". Section A - fantrol Room Design Review Screening
. Does the system contain signals transmitted to the control room for indication, ;
recording, annunciation, computer inputs, or engineered safety features? O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 51 Revision 4 PM1. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK Section B - Control Room Desian Review l ! The following questions should be answered for each system.
- Are the controls for the system (main or local panels) located in functional groups related to system structure?
- Are secondary controls and displays that are not important to safety located on secondary panels?
e Is any color codmg consistent with other color coding in the control room and doesit provide adequate contrar,t? ,
- Are distinctive enhancement techniques used for emergency controls?
e Are frequently used controls located near the center of the preferred visual and manual areas as defined in NUREG 07007 e Are functionally related controls ard displays grouped together? e Are components arranged left to right and/or top to bottom and in a numeric or alphabetic sequence? e Are the minimum separation guidelines ofNUREG 0700 table 7-6 and figure 7-11 complied with?
- Are displays arranged in horizontal rows?
- Are controls appropriately and clearly labeled?
e Has a Hierarchical labeling practice in accordance with NUREG 0700, figure 7-12 been applied? e Are major labels used to identify the system? e Are labels placed above the device they describe? I e Are labels horizontally oriented to facihtate readmg / e Is the nomenclature used on labels the same as that used in the e procedures? e- Are the names, acronyms abbreviations system numbers, etc. used on labels consistent and administratively controlled? l e Is the direction (increase-decrease ) indice.ted for continuous motion rotary controls? l e Are any lines of demarcation for functions or groups visually distinctive?
- 1s any color codmg used to identify specific functions applied uniformly l
throughout the control room?
- Are labels clearly readable considering viewing distances and illumination at the panel?
O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
, H - 52 Revision 4 M-01. DOC June 26,1998
i MILISTONE UNIT 2 l SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCI1:N PI 01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CIMCKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART G ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS l INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Environmental Qualification is reviewed using the following checklist and the l results of the review are recorded on Form 3 PartG. l l
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to i be utilized by theinspection team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
i Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable s to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
j A. ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW CRITERIA The following question will be used to screen the system for Environmental Quahfication applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in Section"B." Section A - Environmental On=116cadon Screeninn l
- Does the System contain " ACTIVE" components that must be operable during an accident, under post accident environmental conditions?
- Parsons Power Group lac. -
PI- $3 Revision 4 ( PIOl. DOC June 26,1998 I
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTDISTRUCTION PI 01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK Section B - Environmental Qualification Review The following questions should be answered for each component requiring Environmental qualification: e Has Millstone Unit 2 developed an environmental qualification program in accordance with 10CFR50.497 e Does the program have well-defined criteria for: identification of harsh environments? l - identification of safety related eq4aawat? . identification of es%'M equipment? control and maintenance of documentation including EQ Configuration Control? e Are Equipment Qualification Rp.rts developed?
- Do they evaluate EQ Test Reports for tested configuration, anomahes, spurgistic effects, etc?
- Are the reports readily auditable?
Do they satisfy worst-case environmental conditions including submergence? e Is there a program in place to ensure moddications appropriately address egiaa==* environmental qualification? e Is there a program in place to ensure maintenance of qualification for:
-- responsibilities ofpersonnel?
training ofpersonnel? identification of what oojip===t is EQ identify location generic equipment that is within the equipment loop for areas that are in a harsh environment? a formal maintenance program in place to ensure qualified life? I - equipment qualification requirement incorporation into Procurement Specifications? e Are changes in accident analysis reflected in changing environments and operating time for equipment? I
- Do dose calculations include source terms identified in NUREG 0588 and Reg Guide 1.897 e When DOR qualified equipment is replaced and an upgrade to 10CFR50.49 qualified equipment is not made, is a " sound reason to the contrary" l developed?
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
, PI- 54 Revision 4 PM1. DOC June 26,1998 j l , l l
IWILIRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI2N FI-41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECELISIS AND WORKBOOK
- Is the installed component in the plant checked during the Walkdown to assure that the installed configuration i.e., manufacturer model electrical / process spec., interfaces (cables, splices, terminal blocks, etc.); special EQ installation (conduit seals, weep holes, etc.) is in accordance with the qualification document?
l
. {
l O V I l iO
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-55 Revision 4 FI.01. DOC June 26,1998
-__________________________--__a
IWITHTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTISN FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS11i AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART H. EROSION / CORROSION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Erosion /Corrosto is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part H.
- 2. The System Lead Enginaar or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to i be utihzed by the inanac+ ion team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, v.apanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. EROSION / CORROSION PROGRAM REVIEW CRITERIA l
- Has Millstone Unit 2 developed an erosion / corrosion monitoring program? j e Does the program have well-defined criteria for:
- selectinginWon points deterinining inapac+ ion frequency ,
- defining method ofinspection l
- making rep 1=c-mant/ repair decisions
- Does the programinclude:
- high-energy single-phase lines, including long-term inWon two-phase lines, I Inding guidelines and computer codes :
large moderate-energy single-phase piping systems l
- Has a plant-specific history of pipe wall thinning, including failure analysis and ;
damage mechanism been established? e Has a training program been implan=ntad? e Have personnel conducting NDE examinations been properly certified?
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 56 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
l MulRTONE UNIT 2 l SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISIS AND WORKBOOK 1 n l FORM 3 PARTI EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS l CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS l l INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. External Events / Hazards is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part I.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utihzed by the inspection team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and r do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable ( to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS REVIEW CRITERIA e Does the system include buildmgs, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by wind loads?
. Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by snow loads?
. Does the system include buildings, equipment or distnbution lines that are affected by seismicloads?
e Does the system include buildings, equipment or distnbution lines that are affected by tornado loads?
- Does the system include buildings, equipment or distribution lines that are affected by hurricane loads?
- Does the system include buildings, equipint , or o tribution lines that are affected by flooding caused by natural pbe- 'er.
- Does the system include buildmgs, equipr- 'tstributionlines that could be affected by possible malevolent use of velu
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI 57 Revis _.24 Pl.01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI2N PI-01 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART J GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV) CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Generic Letter 89-10 (MOV)is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Fonn 3 Part J.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist Ahall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
- 3. Ths SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expandmg them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook. )
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable O to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV) CRITERIA
- Are there safety related motor operated valves in this system?
- Are there safety related position changeable valves in this system?
- Are there non-safety related valves in this system that should be included in the G.L. 89-10 program?
e Was the G.L. 89-10 program considered during the installation of new valves in this system? e Was the G.L. 89-10 program considered during the maintenance of valves in this system? I P 1 O
- Parseas Power Group Inc. - l PI-58 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998 '
IWirIRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART K HEAVY LOADS CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCITONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Heavy Loads are reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part K.
- 2. The System Lead Engiw or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utdized by the inWon team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, arpanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specia'ist to include each question ifit is not applicable O to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in l the system review checklist or Appendix A. l l
i A. HEAVY LOADS REVIEW CRITERIA ! l i e Has a control-of-heavy-loads program been established for the plant in accordance with NUREG-0612. j e Does the system have any safe shutdown equipment positioned under a ! overhead load handling system capable oflifting the plant defined heavy load? l I O l - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l
- l. PI.59 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILIETONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI41 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O - Q FORM 3 PART L HIGH AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE BREAKS (HELB/MELB) CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. High and Moderate Energy Line Breaks (HELB/MELB) is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Pan L.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions /reqdrements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to j be utilized by theinspection team.
l l
- 3. The SLE or Speciaib reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable ( to the selected system. l
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
1 A. HELB/MELB REVIEW CRITERIA e Are HELB/MFiR location requirements identified in accordance with the Licensing / Design Basis? L e Are essential systems / components required for operation of the system being l reviewed identified in design documents? , e Does system satisfy separation criteria for essential systems / components? l e Are break effects considered and mitigated or evaluated correctly? !
- Are flooding, jets and spray conditions evaluated or identified in design documents?
. Are mitigating or evaluated conditions identified in design documents for use in l maintaining configuration?
l
- Are pipe rupture / whip restraints or structural separation provided at break locations as required to protect other systems required for shutdowns?
l
- Parseas Power Gmup Inc. -
l PI-60 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 '.l l _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
I MILIETONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTISN FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK
- Are safe shutdown components for other systems protected fromjets from the system?
I l O l 1 l i O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-61 Revision 4 PI-Olm June 26,1998
IwirJRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK
~
FORM 3 PART M INSERVICEINSPECTION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS 1 l INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Insetvice Inspection is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part M.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparbig the specdic review questions to be utihzed by the inspection team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
l Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and , do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable ! to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checkhst or Appendix A.
A. (NSERVICE INSPECTION REVIEW CRITERIA e Are any system components part of the mechanical integrity or pressure rataining capability of a: , - Pump
- valve PPng ii
. vessel storage tank '
- Rx Vessel Support Structures
- supports for piping, vessel, storage tank that fall into the boundaries of the ISI Program?
e Does the component have any augmented exam requirements identified in the ISI program ====1
- Are any system components listed in the ISI manual. ,
1
- Farseas Power Group Inc. -
PI-62 Revision 4 FI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTI2N PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART N INSERVICE TESTING /10 CFR50 APPENDIX J TESTING CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Inservice Inspection /10CFR50 Appendix J Testing is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part M.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the m
' spection team.
- 3. The SLE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and does not require the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the "O selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist questions contained in the licensing basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendix A and B.
A. INSERVICE TESTING APPENDIX J REVIEW CRITERIA
- 1. Does the IST Program systems (program / topical area) properly reflect all required Design and Licensing bases?
- 2. Are all systems (program / topical area) pumps and valves and their associated i
tests required by ASME Section XI (applicable Code year) identified in the IST Program? B.10CFR50 APPENDIX "J" TESTING REVIEW CRITERIA l 1. Does the Appendix J Testing Program (Type "C") systems (program / topical area) properly reflect all required Design and Licensing bases? , I
- 2. Are all the valves under thejurisdiction of 10CFR50 Appendix "J" (Type "C") ]
Testing Program systems (program / topical area) identified for periodic ! ( testing? l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-63 Revision 4 FI-01. DOC June 26,1998 f L I
l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK B. INSERVICE /10CFR50 APPENDIX "J" TESTING PROGRAMS COMMON REVIEW CRITERIA
- 1. Are the IST and 10CFC0 Appendix "J" Test (Type "C") Test Results within the systems (progranv topical areas) tracked and trended?
l
- 2. When Repair / Replacement and Modifications are performed on the Inservice /10CFR50 Appe. dix "J" (fype "C") Testing Program systems (program / topical areas), are the applicable pre and post test requirements implemented?
l l l 0
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
FI-64 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998 ,
I I MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK ((j O FORM 3 PART O IPEEE l CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCI' IONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. IPEEE is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part O.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inspection team.
l
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and
- do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable
,e to the selected system.
t
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendoc A.
A. IPEEE REVIEW CRITERIA e Was the Millstone Unit 2 IPEEE performed consistent with the Licensing and l Design Bases requirements.
- Was the Millstone Unit 2 IPE performed consistent with the Licensing and l l Design Bases requirements?
l 0
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 65 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-el SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART P f MASTER EQUIPMENT AND PARTS LIST (MEPL) CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Master Equipment and Parts List is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part P.
- 2. The System Lead Fagim or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the iaWon team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, ava=ading them as required, and completes the appropriate system speedic form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
I I A. MEPL REVIEW CRITERIA i e General Is the System and the components in the system ==W the correct i Safety Classification in accordance with the Licensing and Design Basis?
- Is the Safety Function correctly defined for Category I components?
- Is the functional basis for the system safety related determination in agreement with the Tier 2 critical safety functions?
e MEPL changes for Parts Has MEPL changes for Parts reflect the component's safety I classdication and eMa*M licensing / design basis.
- Does the evaluation for use of commercial grade items reflect the components safety chamincation and ==M=*M licensing / design basis.
O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FI-66 Revision 4 FI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MnJRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Vendor TechnicalInformation For Key Safety Related Components have the associated vendor documents been reviewed for periodic update? - i
- Periodic updates can be required as a result of plant modi 6 cations, industry experience or equipment vendor changes.
- Are periodic updates incorporated in affected O&M procedures, drawings, databases, EQ packages, etc.7
- Have parts and subcomponents updates / changes to VTI been incorporated into the MEPL7
. PhysicalVeri6 cation (Walkdown) ,
- Do the NNECo drawings identiSed as operations critical reflect MEPL data for safety related and augmented quahty?
A l l l l l l r f l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-67 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-01 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART Q l REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Rpa+my Guide 1.97 compliance is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part Q.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utihzed by the in=~+ ion team l
l
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as
- l. required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and l f- do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable l -( me wwted system. L
- 4. If .pplicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question m.t tr+i in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
l l 1 ; l A. R.G.1.97 REVIEW CRITERIA Are all of the instruments required to meet the licensing basis for Regulatory ; Guide 2.97 for the system included in the MP2 design Basis (SP-M2-EE- ! 0012)? e Is the correct measured variable type (A, E, C, D, or E) assigned in accordance with RG 1.977 e Is the RG 1.97 instrumentation qualified for the post accident environmental conditions in the zone where it is located? e Is the RG 1.97 instrumentation powered from safety related power sources where required by RG 1.977 e Have the instrument ranges been selected to cover post accident measured l variable values? e Do the plant testing programs cover the periodic testing ofRG 1.97 O instrumentation?
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-68 Revision 4 PMI. DOC June 26,1998
- ___ - -__ _ ______ _ _ 2 ______ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
i l MTIJRTONE UNIT 2 l SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCI12N PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHEtVII5i1S AND WORKBOOK
' FORM 3 PART R l SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTR'UCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Separation /ind padance/ diversity is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part R.
- 2. The System Lead haiaaar or Spxialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inmaac+ ion team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as l
required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook. Note: these questions / requirements are custonuzed for each selected system and
- do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable q) to the selected system.
I
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review chacMint or Appandiv A.
A. SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY REVIEW CRITERIA The following quwtion will be used to screen the system for Separation / Independence / Diversity applicabihty. A yes answer will require a more detailed j review as defined in section"B" Section A- Seoaratina/tadaaendance> Diversity Review Scremaino I e Does the system contain " Active" components that must be operable during an ; accident, or post-accident conditions or during/after a seismic event? 1 ; l l l Section B - Senaration/IndenandaacelDiversity Review l e If the question is answered yes, a Separation / Independence / Diversity review of the system is required.
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 69 Revision 4 FI41. DOC June 26,1998
l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3FROJECTINSTRUCTI2N PI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISYS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART S SET POINT CONTROL CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Set point controlis reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part S.
- 2. The System Lad hp-r or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utikzed by theinspection team.
- 3. The SLE or SMHa* reviews the following questions, expanding them as !
required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook. Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable O to the selected system
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. SET POINT CONTROL REVIEW CRITERIA The following question will be used to screen the system for Set Po* m t Control applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B".
. Section A - Set Point Control Review Scrw.ks i
e Does the system contain at least one set point, which is critical to operation of the system, during an accident, post-accident or during/after a seismic event? l i O
- Parsons PowseCreep Inc. -
1 Pl.70 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
! IwyrJSTONE UNIT 2 l SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-el SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O Q Section B - Set Point Control Review
~
1 l For each calculation answer the following questions.
. Are all assumptions reasonable and normal?
e Is good engineering judgement used in making and quahfying the assumptions? e Are the assumptions complete?
. Are all design inputs complete, documented, reasonable and nonnal?
- Are the sources ofdata for these calculations reasonable and reliable?
. Are all applicable process conditions and effects properly ' addressed?
l l . Is the methodology used consistent with the time of the calculation?
. ' Are all appropriate assumptions and setpoints transferred to plant documents?
e Are the setpoints used in the plant enveloped by the calculations?
- Do the calculations support the technical specifications and other design documents?
i i 1 l l l i i l A ()
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 71 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 l
lunryJ ATONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI3N FI 41 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART T SINGLE FAILURE CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
' INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Single Failure is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part T.
l
- 2. The System Lead hgina- or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the speci6c review questions to be utilized by the inaa-* ion team.- j l
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each questionifit is not applicable to the selected system. O 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A. A. SINGLE FAILURE REVIEW The following question will be used to screen the system for Single Failure Review
.ypJinty. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in section "B" Section A - Single Failure Review Screening
- Does the system contain any active components that must be operable during j an accident or under post-accident conditions? !
Section B - Single Failure Review If the question is answered yes, a single failure review of the system is required.
. Was a single failure analysis performed on each component required per Section A7
- Parness Power Group Inc. -
PI-72 Revision 4 PM1. DOC June 26,1998
i MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTISN PI41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART U STATION BLACKOUT CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS l INSTRUCTIONS l l 1. Station Blackout is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the I review are recorded on Form 3 Part U. l l 2. The System Lead Fagiaa-r or Specialist shall use the following l questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the irrgtion team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, --priirg them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and , do not require the SLE or SpMalist to include each question ifit is not applicable O to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. STATION BLACKOUT REVIEW CRITERIA The following questions will be used to screen the system for Station Blackout applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in Section B. Section A - Station Blackout Review Scrw.:.a j
- Is the system being reviewed identified in the Millstone Unit SBO response scenario as being utilized?
Section B - Station Blackout Review
- Are the system SBO functions identi6ed in NNECo's SBO scenario consistent with theNUMARC document?
- Panens Power Group Inc. - i i
PI-73 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 . l
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Can the components perform the required function as described in the SBO scenario?
. Are all of the system components required to perform the SBO ftmetion listed in tie SBO equipmentlist?
- Do the MEPL and PMMS entries for the system identify the SBO function e correctly for the components required for SBO?
e Do any SBO related calculations for the system follow the NUMARC guidance for method, use the correct inputs and are correctly performed to obtain a correct result? e Verify that any containment isolation valves in the system will fait closed in an SBO or can be maan=Hy closed. '
. Verify that any system electrical equipment that is powered from the alternate AC source during an SBO can be connected to the alternate AC source and that all of the breakers required are identified on the SBO Component list.
- Verify the DC and AC loads used in SBO Power requirement calculations for system cow 4+nents are correct.
- Verify that any system instrumentation required during an SBO is powered from an available source and is correctly identi6ed in the station operatmg Procedures
- Review SBO Emergency Operating Procedures for the system to assure that they correctly implement the SBO scenario.
V l l 1 I 1 I i O
- Farness Power Group Inc. -
PI-74 Revision 4
. PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
)
MILIETONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART V APPENDIX R CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Appendix R is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part V.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following 1 questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to l be utihzed by the inspection team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook. !
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable O to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. APPENDIX R CRITERIA The following questions will be used to screen the system for Appendix R ; applicability. A yes answer will require a more detailed review as defined in Section B. Section A- Anoendix R Review Screeninn e Is the system (or any portion of the system) necessary for safe plant shutdown in the event of a 10CFR50 Appendix R fire? Section B - Anoendix R Review e Are the system and the specific safe shutdown components appropriately defined in the plant Appendix R documentation and in the operating procedures used by operating personnel for a fire scenario?
- Parseas Power Group 1me. -
Pl.75 Revision 4 PMI. DOC Jure 26,1998
MILIATONE UNIT 2 SYSRPZ.OJECTINSTRUCTI3N FI41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISIS AND WORKBOOK O e Does the Appendix R documentation demonstrate compliance to the separation enteria of 10CFR50 Appendix R, Section M.G.2'for the safe shutdown components and circuits? e Are local manual operations or local administrative actions (if applicable) adequately defined? e Is alternative or dedicated shutdown canahility (e.g. remote shutdown for a main control room fire) provided in accordance with 10CFR50 Appendix R, Section M.L7 e For the fire areas requiring the use of the system for safe shutdown, does the Appendix R documentation demonstrate the availability of the n~*===ry support systems; e.g. electrical power, control power, service water, HVAC7 e Have the equipment and circuits n~*===ry for safe shutdown been identified? e Has the impact offire barriers / wrap on cable derating t,een addressed? e For manual actions n~*= y for safe shutdown, has the required lighting and communication been provided? e Have associated circuits been identified and their impact addressed? e For the system under reviews, do the circuits and equipment required for safe shutdown have adequate separation or fire barriers in rqrwaative fire zones. O i l l O
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI- 76 Revision 4
. PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNTT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI3N PI 01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK FORM 3 PART W USI A-46 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. USI A-46 Seismic Quah6 cation is reviewed using the following checklist and the resuhs of the review are recorded on Form 3 Part W.
- 2. The System Lead Engineer or Specialist shall use the following questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utilized by the inpion team.
- 3. The SLE or Specialist reviews the following questions, arpanAng them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and w do not require the SLE or Specialist to include each question ifit is not applicable 5 to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE or Specialist may use other checklist question contained in the system review checklist or Appendix A.
A. SEISMIC QUALIFICATION REVIEW CRITERIA e Has a " Verification of Seismic Adequacy ofMechanical and Electrical l Equipment, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A 46" program been established and executed for the plant? , l e Does the program in Item 1 comply with the Seismic Qualification Utility l, Group's (SQUG) Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), including l Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report Number 2, to satisfy Generic Letter 87-027
- Identify any significant or programmatic deviation from the GIP's guidelines for seismic verification of plant equipment.
I e Does the system include any active mechanical and electrical components and cable trays that are required during and following a design basis seismic event? O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-77 Revision 4 FI41. DOC hoe 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Does the system include tanks and heat exchangers that are required to achieve and maintain safe shutdown? e Does the system include any outliers identified during the implementation of the USI A-46 resolution program? l . What is the methodology used for seismic qualification of outliers? l
- Has the SGUG's GIP's methodology been utihzed for seismic qualification l
ofnew and replacement components? e Have allidentified USI A-46 corrective actions been addressed to satisfactory conclusions for the subject system? e Was there any integration between the USI A-46 and IP,EEE programs? O O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-78 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
6 , . . ; DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 1 of rr l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O Icivr SvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSrEu: LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engineer: (System Team Lead) g PART A SYSTEM DESIGN AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION I REVISION 2 aw.marmon sisem /nm swanw.ca L ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - -
Mechanical Lead Electricallead Contrrl Systemslead Piping /StructuralLead Operations Enpnm I'Iccedwus Fnene Testmg Engmeer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
O System Leed Fnene SVSR Lead Enszeer PART B.1 SYSTEM
SUMMARY
Instructions: (1) ne SLE will resfew the attached checklists and suppkmental material and ladicate whether the system adequately considered or incorporated the indicated requirements. (2) The SLE will review the attached program / topical checklists and supplemental material and indicate whether the system adequately considered or incorporated the indicated requirements. (3) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP-07. REVISION O REVISION 1 REVISION 2 L Have Systemlicensing requirements been O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No adequately addressed?
- 2. Have all program / topical areilisted been O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No adequately addrused?
- 3. Are component requirements satisfied? O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No
- 4. Summary of Discrepan 7(ies) Items ,
Signature SLE/Date O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 1 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3,,CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 2 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsibic Fngmeer-PART B.2 SYSTEM PROGRAM /FOPICAL
SUMMARY
Instructions: (1) ne OE will summariae which of the program areas are included in the licensing basis of the system. This Part should not be conopleted until the detail reviews in Parts E through W have been completed. (2) ne OE meeds to assure that NNECo has c msidered the applicability of EACH program / topical area. When dispositioning the question below, the CE mt so review the liceaslag basis or program to the extent that NNECo considered it during in the system design. NOTE: Because these are topical areas, NNECo licensing basis needs to sggaldtI each prigram/ topical area for applicability. However, EAg[ area may not effect/ impact the system and beace not be applicable to the licensing / design basis. Form 3 APPLICABLE TO Reference PROGRAMfrOPICAL AREA THE SYSTEM Section CURRENT Part LICENSING BASIS E Anticipated Trannents Without SCRAM (ATWS) D Yes D No F ControlRoom Design Review D Yes O No G Environmental Quahfication of Electncal Equipment (EQ) D Yes D No H Erosion / Corrosion D Yes D No I ExternalEvents/ Hazards D Yes D No J GenericIsetter 89-10 (MOV) D Yes D No K HeavyI. cads D Yes O No L High and Moderate Energy Line Breaks (HELB/MELB) D Yes D No M InserviceInspection D Yes D No N Inservice Testing /10 CFR50 Appendix J Testing O Yes D No O IPEEE D Yes D No l l P Master Equipment and Parts List (MEPL) D Yes D No l Q Regulatory Guide 1.97 Compliance D Yes D No ! f I R Separation /rnA7 _ =*=e> Diversity 0 Yes D No i l S Set Point Control O Yes D No l ! T Single Failure D Yes D No l l U Station Blackout O Yes O No l( (
- Parsons Power Givup Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 2 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3.,,CLLED. DOC 12/22/97
i DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 3 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team 1md) V 10 CFR50 Appendix R D Yes D No i W USI A 46 Setsmic Quahfication D Yes O No l 1. O Yes O No A review of the program / topical area indicates that the cunent system limncmg/ design basis has
- consulered the applicability of gg;h program / topical area. (If"Yes," sign and date below. If"No,"
l verify that a dimwy was processed as part of system program review. Indicate in step 2 the . l program, sign and date. REMEMBER, APPLICABILITY is a reautrement but l CONSIDERATION is a crocess). l Originatmg Fnai=*r/Date: 2.a The following Program (s) Has Not Been Considered: [OE Delete this item is not applicable]
- a. PROGRAM:
q D DISCREPANCYprocessed b Originating Engineer /Date: l 1 1 i G
- Parsons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 3 <
I-43 -3 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3,,CI1BD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB. Page 4 ofxx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ,
]
ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST j Responable Engmeer- l (System Team Lead) l PART C SYSTEM LICENSING / DESIGN INPUT REQUIR.EMENT CHECKLIST l I Instructions: For each requiressent listed below: (1) GLE, SIR, OE and systema team develops the specific requiressants to be reviewed using the generic questions in the Instructies and At*=A====t A source book. Egk tequirousent will be given a new itsen number and include steps A, B, C, and D. (2) Each requirement wiu be { _ -G. , numbered starting with I (see). (3) The System Imad Englaser will assign the review group responsible for reviewing each requiressent. ns.Amate I = M, Elecedcol = E, Centrols = IAC, Testing = T Procedures = P. Operations = 0 (4) h individual that reviews the requirunnent will sina and dete. provide a disposition, indicate interfaces, sad provide a response based spen the following-
- m. Yes Requirement is satisfactory addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No explanation /results is required.
- b. No Requirusseet is met satisfacterey addressed or discrepeat candition exists. Provide an explanation of how the requirement was not satisfied. Include reference seurte(s), revisies, and date, as applicable. Disposition the condities as a DISCREPANCY and classify the basis la step B. The responsible individual shall i=wa=*.sy advise the SLE of may requireaneet being dispositioned as l a DISCREPANCY la accordance with Project Procedure PP-47. Initiation of PP-47 wSt be by the l
OL Process and procedernl f.w c '= not dis; r""-- - f la accordance with PP47 wSi be analysed by11er 3.
- c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Expl===*ia= should be included only ifit cladfies the disposition.
- d. INF Requirement could not be verified because infonnaties eeund not be found. If am RAI was generated to clarify the requiressent, the RAI number and subsequent NNECo response reference is to be provided. In Part D indicate the inforesation could met be found and disposities as a DISCREPANCY. h responsible ladividual shalllasasediately advise the SLE of any l requiresnest being dis;- *"- - f as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of PP 47 wGl be by the OE.
l l l l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 4 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 ' F3 CI1RD. DOC I2/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 5 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SYSTEM: LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fnpw (System Team 14ed) PartC Review Requirement Items Group Status Reviewer's Signature L 0 Yes D No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT , B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pr.e PerPr47) O (tmt.edy 4.m r.a by NNECo, m mine n b d UIR , CR or a.cevery W h St.y D). O (n.e sr :hm.:mer esa.aneea ees.cepny k.acosa s er e a.comuness ,ames. n.d.ers.s he ry. . - - ser itsen mihee.,n> C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: l D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
O -
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I43-5 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLRD. DOC , 12/22/97
l DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 6 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST ) Responsible Fnpnaar PART D TOPICAL PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS l Instructions: For each programa/ topical requiressent listed la Egil through.Egi,E below: 1 (1) The OE/rwiewer/ specialist cosapletes and Dispositions Part 31. The reviewer / specialist responsible for the requiressent rwiews the Progroun/ Topical area to the extent necessary to verify that the systems was considered when the progress was deveisped and indicates this verificaties in the appropriate area below. (2) If Part 31 is disposition as Applicable, the GLE, SLE, and OE/aparialaat deveisps the specific requiressants to be reviewed using the generic questions la the lastruction and Ae**eh-* A source book and enters the requineament to be reviewed in Part 32. Eg;h requirennent will be gives a new itema aussber and hacinde steps A, R, C, and D. (3) Each requireansat wul be -- -.", amenbered staning with 1 (see). (4) Ibe SystemiIAnd Engineer wSi assign the review group responsible for reviewing each requironneet. Ma=le=1 = M, Electrical = E, Centrols = IAC, Testing = T, Procedures = P, Operations = 0 (5) The OE/ Specialist that reviews the requirement wSi aien and date. prwide a "; '" =. Indicate interfaces, sad prwide a response based upon the followtag-
- n. Yes Requirassent is - " "- ---;;, addressed. lacinde reference source, revision, and date. No
%' "--'results is required.
- b. No Requirousset is met satisfactory addressed or discrepast condition esists. Prwide an explanaties of how the requiream it was met satisfied. Include reference source (s), revision, and date, as applicable. C '" the condities as a DISCREPANCY and classify the basis in step R. 'Ibe reopensible ladividual shalli==adia*aly advise the SLE of say requineament being dispositiemed as a DISCREPANCY la accordance with Project Procedure PP-07. Initia*iam of PP-47 will be by the OL Process and procedural A , r + not dispannein.ad la aceerdance with PP-47 wHl be smalysed by thr3.
- c. NA Requireensat is not applicable. E ," - "-- should be included endy ifit clarifles the di=paaleta=
- d. INF Requirement could met be vertfled hae== infonastlos could met be found. If am RAI was generated to claiify the requiressent, the RAI meanber and subsequent NNEco response reference is to be prwided. In Part D indicate the leforunation could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The reopensible ladividual shallimmunediately advise the SLE of any requirannent being , '"--- ' as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of PP-07 will be by the OE. 1 1
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 6 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 7 ofxx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST FP=ible Engmeer (System Tamlead) PART E ANTICIPATED TRANSIENT WITHOUT SCRAM (ATWS) CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING .
- 1. D Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initianan of the program?
l 2. D Yes O No Has NNECo <=awred or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area within the FSAR? l 3. D Yes D No Has NNECo <==idered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program /topacal area being mW within current (1) system design criteria, (2)
"'ad'*"ha" Process or (3) denga input?
l N the response to questices 1,2, gad 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. De OE will process the r - _, zy in accordance with FF-07. N response to questions 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," ca=ri==* with mest question.
- 4. D Yes D No Does the system include the apphcable provisions for the H~a ia: basis reqmrements for A=*: , i Transienes Without SCRAM (ATWS)?
N Yes, D';: "'r as PROGRAM IS AFFLICABLE. Cesaplete Part E.1 eheeldina N
*No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT AFFLICABLE TO SYSTEM.
B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (Prooses per PP 07) O (Prmamly escovered by NNECo, suammenze basis and UIR, CR or dmoovery h==* in Sep D). O (* - ^ is not Adiy m but does not asset pbymaalcoassurance " -
' .desisobasisor resulesasy requirassums. Sunensrus basis in map D).
O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE ProgresarTopical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date-O - Parseas Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I43 7 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3,.CILED. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 8 of rr MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer PART E.1 ANTICIPATED TRANSIENT WITHOUT SCRAM (ATWS) CHECKLIST Parte.1 Review Requirement Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT
)
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperPr-e7) O (Previously discovered by NNECo,summunarke hemis and UIR.CR er discovery decennent in Step D). O (= . ^is m.:may - h.:do.s .s.ca panic as es a-+ d ism hesis orrequintory. , - ^- % hasis im step D). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
I I O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 1 8 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CI1BD. DOC 12/22/97
i DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page ,p_.gff.g MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND l LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fngnwr (System Teamland) PART F CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo m==wlared or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topacal ama dunng the imharion of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No- Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR7
- 3. O Yes D No Has NNECo macidered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /lopical area being reviewed within curmat (1) system design criteria, (2) marbfiMan process or (3) design input?
If the response to q=atiana 1,2, ad 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. 'Ibe OE will process the , my in accordmace with PP-07. If itsponse to q==*ia== 1,2, gg 3 is "Yes," contimme with mest q=* aria = 0 4. 3 Yes O No Does the system have any controls, labehng or operstmg procedures effected by the Control Room Design Review or Human Factors Review?? l If Yes, r_ , "'= as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part F.1 checkliata. If "No," ;- 'n as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYS'11M. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcomparFP47) O (Prmoudy decovered by NNECo, ==== rue basis and (HR . CR cr decovery h==* in Step D). O (= ^ is not Adly =*=s-i but &=s not aft.c phync.1 oces urminan s - ~ .desisabasis or resulesary:=qunanens. sunumerize beeis in soap D) O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Prograan/ Topical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Dete: O - Parseas Power Group Inc. - 1 FORM: 3 I-03 -9 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97 L-_----------___----.--------_____--._----_---.-
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 10 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O 1Cive SvSa SvSrEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Respoemble Fngman-(System TeamImd) PART F.1 CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST PartF.1 Review Requireanent Itema Group status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. D Yes O No O NA D INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pres == perPr47) O (Provisa% dhcovered by NNECe, sumumarke hads and UIR, CR or dheevery docuansat h Step D) O (magahnmenthm.:amy shandn :dessm.enebetphydcelesmagurudseW dodge hads er reguhdory reqdressemes. Summentse beds b step D) l O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l 1 0 - Parsons Power Ginup Inc. - FORM: 3 I le Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLIJBD. DOC 12/2257
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page Il of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fngmaer-(System TeamIAnd) PART G ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (EQ) CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING -
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo consulered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topicri area within the FSAR7
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being revin,ed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) madsficarian picxzes or (3) design input?
If the response to q=atians 1,2, and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. De OE will process the discrepancy is accordance with PP 47. If response to q=amia=s 1,2, E3 is "Yes," contiane with next q=miam
- 4. O Yes O No Does the system contain " Active" companents that must be operable during an accident, under post amdent environmental conditions or dunng/after a enemic event?
If "Yes", Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE and cosaplete Part G.1 ch.carhat If "No," " "= as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM, B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA (Checkonly one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcoupwPP 07) O (Previously decovered by NNEco. summenze basis and UIR , CR or decovery hw in Step D). O (* . - is not fully : mrad but do. as sa.a: Pbymmi conss ur. >one = =_ d isab. sis or regulatory requiremanes Sumamense basis in assp D) O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPUCABLE Programfropical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: l 1
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 11 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97 j i
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 12 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: l O 1CivrSvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEx: LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST l Respoemble Fngn-l PART G.1 ENMRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT (EQ) CHLCKLIST
. 1 PartG.1 Review Requirvenent Item Group itatus Resiewer's Signature j 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT i B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Free = per Fr.e7) O (r. .:4 e.eeveredbyNNECe, hhans d UIR,CR.rdheeveryd-hkey D). ! O (=# hmee any a e.d b :4 e s.es physk ie.masures d.c==. mees ,d.ds. hash er. . , regieres me % hans h .s., p). l C. REFERENCF4S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l 1 l0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 4 3 - 12 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3,,,CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97 l
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 13 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O ICivr SvSa SvSTEM DESIGN INrUT AND SvSTE== LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fnpneer-PART H EROSION / CORROSION CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the inmation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the programhopical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response te questions 1,2, and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise 2e SLE. De OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-47. If response to questions 1,2, pr 3 is "Yes," contiane with next questnom.
- 4. O Yes O No Has the system been evaluated in accoid&nce with the erosion / corrosion program for the s/ unit?
If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part H.1 checkhsts. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (P:cosasperPP 07) 0 (Prmously esmvered by NNECo, -narize basis and IR , CR or &swvery Ananant in Step D). O (Regmansat is not fully sansfwd but dass not affed physical configuration dommentation, desisn basis er segulatory requireenassa. Summarize basis in stop D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Programfropical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: I O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 4 3 - 13 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 14 ofxx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST ResponsiNe Engineer [ .. - PARTH.1 EROSION / CORROSION CHECKLIST l PartH.1 Renew Requiresnemt Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes D No D NA O INT Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (rmemrerFr.e7) O (rmbedy e.coveres by NNECo, mummute huis W IIM,CR or euevery dw ha key D) O (n.,.kum sis mee me smess.a he a :.s.et ,hydad . - - - d ism g had erresensiery r guiresumen. % h sesin seep D) l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l i O - Persons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 3 , I43 - 14 Package Sequence No. 4 t Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 15 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmoer: PARTI EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo mnnulared or addressed the potanhal unpact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?
- 2. D Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential unpact on this system for the program / topical area withm the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l Program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
N the response to @a 1,2, gad 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy is accordance with PP-47. If response to specia== 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," contimme with next question. O 4. D Yes D No Is the system located within budding structures or include other features required to protect the system from external missiles, tornadars, floodtng or other external events included in thelicensingbasis? If Yes, r':g as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part L1 charidia*= If l "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE I TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (Procas per PP 07) O (hmously ducovered by NNECo, manmann basis and UDt. CR ar decovery donament in Step D) l O (= . - ^ is not Adly e bis does not asma pbnical aanssuratica '--- -- M desip basis or regula:aryw sununena basis in m.p D) l O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist /Date: _,,, Originating Engineer /Date: , I i - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 3 I43-15 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22 S 7
DOCUhENTID: RC-SLB- Paga 16 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fnpneer-
. . . . . - . . . . _ ~ . . . _ . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . . . . . , _ . _ .
PART L1 EXTERNAL EVENTS / HAZARDS CHECKLIST PartL1 Review Requirement liaan Group Status , Reviewer's Sirnature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Fr es p rFr.e7) O (riven 4 dheevered by NNFre. m rhe b is d UIR,CR er dheevery w1 8sey D) O (= . - hseeany sha.d b.:4 e.s.caphyik i aser si deci i.si d ism h is er . . , . . _ - s she b is h es ,Dy C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
0 - Persons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 83 - 16 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3.,CLLBD. DOC 12/2267
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 17 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System TeamImd) PART J GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV) CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes D No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potentialimpact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes D No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?
- 3. D Yes O No Has NNECo onnadesed or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria. (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response to questions 1,2, ad 3 is "No", E'7'"-- as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. "Ihe OE will process the discrepamey in accordamee with PP 47. If response to questions 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," esatione with mest question.
- 4. O Yes D No Have the motor operated valves in the system been evaluated under the unit's program for MOV's? (89-10)?
If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Consplete Part J.1 checkHets ](
"No," " ;- = as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.
B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (Process per PP o7) D (Prmously escovered by NNEco, summarize basis and UIR, CR or &acovery Am-ne in Step D) O (n- " is not Adly seus6ed but does ad a5sct phyncal con 6surabon A- -- - n desisn basis or resulatory requirements. Summenze basis in step D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE PrograacHopical Specialist /Date: Origlanting Eagineer/Date: i l l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. - ;
FCRM: 3 i I 17 Package Sequence No. 4 ! I Revision 3 F3,,CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 18 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST l Responsible Fngmm-(System TeamIAed) PART J.1 GENERIC LETTER 89-10 (MOV) CHECKLIST PartJ.1 Review Requirement Items Group Status Reviewer's Signature 1 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS j O DISCREPANCY: O (Froeses per FF-07) O (Fmisenty encevered by NNFro, summunerhe hash and UIR , CR er dhcevery h im Seep D) O (= . k eany nha.a hun d m eashesphyskni asures 4.c==. manes 4.sisa j hesis or - summmarke hesisin seep D) O , I 4 C. EIZli;P Ei? 'ES) & SOURCE / REVISION 1 DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT 1
1 o - Persons Power Group Inc. - 1 l FORM: 3 . 143-18 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3,,CLLBD. DOC 12/22 S 7
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 19 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fnpneer* PART K HEAVY LOADS CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the PSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response to questions 1,2, ad 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. 'Ibe OE will process the discrepancy la accordance with PP-07. If response to questions I,2, gr 3 is "Yes," continue with next question.
- 4. O Yes O No Have any cranes located over the system been evaluated under the Unit's heavy loads l
Program? If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Coasplete Past K.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. l B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (1%cessper PP-07) O (Previously damwred by NNECo, summann basis and UIR , CR or dumvery domment in Step D). O (" - -isnoctunysansr dbutdo not.fr.a physualcons urationdocummsation.danisobuisor s regulatory requiremanas. Summarize basis in step D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Progrusa/ Topical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 43 - 19 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3, CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
i DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 20 of rr i MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fngmacr* PART K.1 HEAVY LOADS CHECKLIST PartK.1 Revim Requiressent Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes D No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT 1
l l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O san 8iFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pr=== per Fr 47) O (Pnvloedy dhcovend by NNECe, summertu hash and UIR,CR or dhoovg h in Step D). O (= . h mee any - but d.e. mea ns.ct physleal comeguraden h dedge hesis or n. . j requina mes. a--- tu hashin se y D) l kJ l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: l D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l l l l l l l i l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
l FORM: 3 l I 20 Package Sequence No. 4 l Revision 3 F3_CIJ.BD. DOC 12/2267
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 21 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O 1CiveSvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSrEMI j LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team Lead) PART L HIGH AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE BREAKS (HELB/MELB) CONSIDERATION / SCREENING I l A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potentialimpact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?
I
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response to questions 1,2, ad 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and I advise the SLE. Tbc OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If l response to questions 1,2, E3 is "Yes," continue with mest question.
- 4. O Yes O No Has the effect of pipe nipture and/or breaks in the system been evaluated for the impact on safe shutdown components / systems in accordance with the licensing basis?
If Yes,I"; P= as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part L.I checidists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE l TO SYSTEM. 1 i B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREAIS(Checkonly one): l O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperPP-07) l O (Previously escovered by NhTro, sammersze basis and 1HR, CR or &scovery document in Step D). l O (Requirunent is not ibily satis 6ed but does not affos physical configurauon d~ - '-don, design basis or regulatay requirements. Summanze basis in step D) O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM l 0 PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE l Program / Topical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 21 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CT.r.un. DOC 12/22/97
l DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page J.@ MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: I ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND i LICENSING BASIS l CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer PART L.1 HIGH AND MODERATE ENERGY LINE BREAKS (HELB/MELB) CHECKLIST PartL1 Review Requiresnent Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date l A. REQUIREMENT l
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pmem per FF-07) O (Provi styel.oevered byNNECo,sim s.sisen. sis d UIR,CRordiscoverydw1. Step D) i O (n.,ser eis emay ess.d b.ed s.ccphysic.i . _ - d.cas e.a ,d.de. l g h.si..rres t seryregieres es. S ss rtse b.sisla step D) l l C. REFERENCE 4S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 22 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 j F3.,CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
l DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page A3 gf.n l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ! ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS i CHECKLIST Responsible Fnpaner l . (Swtem TeamImad) PART M INSERVICE INSPECTION CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo <==dared or addressert the potental unpset on this system for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo <=midered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topacal area within the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo <==idated or addressed the potential impact on this system for t'he program / topical area being renewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modi 5 cation process or (3) design input?
l If the response to Wa 1,2, gad 3 is "No', Disposition as DISCREPANCY and i- advise the SLE. The OE wul process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-47. If l response to questions 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," contimme with mest question. l O 4. O Yes O No Are the piping and components of the system included in the unit's insenice inspection Program where appropriate? l If Yes, E4 "' as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part M.1 cheelrlida If l "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TV SYSTEM. l l B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): i O DISCREPANCY: O (ProosesperPP-07) l O (Prmoudy decovered by NNEco, =m basis and UIR, CR or escovery hw in Sup D). l O (Rapairammet is not Mly sehs6ed but does act aabcs physical con 6prehen h-A design basis or resuissory r.,arensasi. sumansnu basis in m.p D) O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE 1D SYSTEM i O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Prograaffapical Specialist /Date: 1 Origianting Engineer /Date: l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 i I 23 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3.,CLLBD. DOC 12/2267
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 24 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM COPE: O Icivr SvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEx: LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team Lead) PART M.1 INSERVICE INSPECTION CHECKLIST PartM.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: ;
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (ProesesperFF47) O (Prvdeu# dhcovered by NNECo. sumusmartse hemis and LTR , CR or discovery documment in Ster D) ; O (n.quir sm.mt is t einy - het dess m.t affect phyukalesmagerades de design hemis or. ._ _j requirumanes, h% beds ha step D). i O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: i l l D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l l l l 0 - Persons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 143-24 Package Sequence Na 4 Revision 3 F3_CI1BD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 25 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engineer M PART N INSERVICE TESTING /10 CFR50 APPENDIX J TESTING CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING - l 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo canmeiered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program? l 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical anta within the PSAR? l l 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo conmelared or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area being resiewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input? l l N the response to questions 1,2, and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and , advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy la accordance with PP-07. N l stsponse to questions 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," continue with next W .
- 4. O Yes O No Are the components in the system covered by the unit's insenice testing program where appropriate? (ASME Section XI or Appendix J)
N Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Past N.1 daartruate N "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. 1 B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): l O DISCREPANCY: O (Process per PP 07) j O (Prsviously discovered by NNECo, mannanze basis and UIR , CR or discovery document in Step D). O (a - ^ is not fully ==a nad but does not afi cs pbyincal conss uratica ' =- --1 desisa basis er resulatory. , ^ sununanzebasisinstepD). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUTIS NOT APPLICABLE 'IT) SYSTEM l 0 PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Progrannopical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: loG
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
I 43 - 25 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3, CILBD. DOC 12/22/97 1
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 26 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: - ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS l CHECKLIST ) Responsible Fnpneer ( (System Team Lead)
)
I PART N.1 INSERVICE TESTING /10 CFR50 APPENDIX J TESTING CHECKLIST I PartN.1 Review Requiresneat Itema Group Status Reviewer's Signature I
- 1. D Yes O No D NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Proces.per PP47) O (Prevberty dhcovered by NNECo, sumammarke base. and UIR , CR or dhcovery document in See, D) O (a.euer e h meemaysees a.d he 4 not sehee phyme.1 __ a.com.meseson,4.nsa 6-i. .r . .. 3 r.gien -+. h h u sa., n). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 26 Package SequenceNo. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 27 ofxx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O SvSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND IcivrSvSa svSTEul LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Far-r (System TeamIeed) PART O IPEEE CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENLNG
- 1. D Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential unpact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential unpact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR7
- 3. D Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the nsponse to q===ela=a 1,2, ad 3 is "No", ri, '"= as D6CREPANCY and advise the SLE. De OE will process the disenpancy in accordance with PP47. If response to q=*atiana 1,2, gg 3 is "Yes," continue with mest question. O Yes O No O' 4. Has the protection of the system been constjered the unit's Individual Plant Frammatian for ExternalEvents?(IPEEE) If Yes, r; '"- = as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part 0.1 cl=eirlista If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAMfI'OPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperPPM) O (Prevaeusly discovered by NNEco, p===== rue basis and UIR.CR or discovery h==a== in Step D). O (Requremens is not ibily mahdad but does not atract phyncel con 6surance ' ---- - _ design basis or resulatoryrequirements. SunenerizebeeisinasepD). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUTIS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Programrfopical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - I43-27 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 28 of rr MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer-(System Team Lead) PART O.1 IPEEE CHECKLIST PartO.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. D Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Process per PP 07) O (Prevhudy dhcovered by NNECo, susumarke hash and UIR , m or discovery docesseed h Step D), O (Requdrumment k met AGy sansSed but does not aftset physical , 1d-H design
~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' '
O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVKEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group lac. -
FORM: 3 I.03 - 28 Package Sequence No. 4 F3,.CLLBD. DOC
I DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 29 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O IcivP SvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTEM: l LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Fe=pannible Fnpaner PARTP MASTER EQUIPMENT AND PARTS LIST (MEPL) CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING - I. O Yes O No Has NNECo enamid**ed or addressed the potential unpact on this system for the program /topail area dunng the inihmeion of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo caamidared or addressed the paeaan=1 impact on this system for the programhopical area within the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo nanandered or addressed the potential impset on this system for the programhopacal area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) unaMic=han psocess or (3) design input?
If the response to st=*=84a== 1,2, and 3 is "No", Dispasimiam as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will pescess the discrepancy la acco 11ance with FF-07. If response to ap= aria == 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," costiame with mest q===*ia= l
- 4. O Yes O No Are the system ---r - t correctly entered into the Master Equipment and Parts List?
If Yes, Diapaal*8a= as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Cosaplete Part P.1 el=eldista If "No," diapaaleia= as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TV SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (IhesperPP 07) O (Prmnaly demvend by NNECo, sununana bans and tHR , CR or desvery daa===ar in Step D) O (= , _ - is noc tuny senssed but does mac as m phyment '. u- a= d iso b is er asuisiary rapsensus. suunnana basis in map D) O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS AFPLICABLE Prograsaffopical Specialist /Date: 1 Originating Engineer /Date: I O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I4 3 - 29 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3,,CLIAD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 30 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team I2nd) PART P.1 MASTER EQUIPMENT AND PARTS LIST (MEPL) CHECKLIST PartP.1 Review Requirement Items Group Status Reviewer's Signature L 0 Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pr perFF-o7) D W aseevered by NNECe, enmete hads ud UM , CR r escovery 4.cunned h Sep D) O (n.gairemment k mee smay sidse.d but s mee es.ca phydemis cama erne % 4 is. hens er. . 3.. summmarke hads k seep D> O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: l D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l i l l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 3 l I 30 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CI1BD. DOC 12/22/97
l i DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page,J_L9fu MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fn[nnece-(System TeamImd) PART Q REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 COMPLIANCE CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area withm the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topicsl area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
N the response to questions 1,2, gad 3 is "No", E'z; r"e= as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. E response to questions 1,2, gr 3 is "Yes," contiene with next question. 0
, 4. O Yes O No Does the system contain the required instrumentation and indication for licensmg basis compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.977 E Yes, Disposition as PR.OGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part Q.1 checklists. N "No," " - "== as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM.
B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (thesperPP-07) O (Prmously d=mered by NNECa, mamann basis and Um , CR or discmary documas in Step D), O (Pt -isnotfullysatissedbutdo notatr.ctphyncalconosurahand~-- 'ariaa desisabasisor regulatory.+k- ^ Summann basisin step D) O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE 'IO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE l Prograantropical Specialist /Dste: Originating Engineer /Dete: I
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 83 - 31 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 32 of xx MILLSTO.NE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP GVSR SYSTEM: l SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND ! l LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer M PART Q.1 REGULATORY GUIDE 1.97 COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST PartQ.1 Review Requirennent Itema Gmup Status Reviewer's Signature l L 0 Yes O No D NA D INF Date l A. REQUIREMENT l 1 i B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: )l l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Ps.c.esParPPm) O (Pmisesty escovered by NNECo, summartse hemis and UIR , CR or dheevery dw h key D) l O (= ,- k met may si.e.d b.e d m.e.she physicat ;_ - :-: -- . d ism bases or resuime.ry requiremssues. Samumadse basis k seep D). l l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: i ! I i D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 I 32 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CI1BD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 33 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: j O ICiveSvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSTtM: l LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System TeamIml) PART R SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. D Yes D No Has NNECo consulered or addressed the potential impact on this s>1aem for the i program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo consulered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?
- 3. D Yes O No Has NNECo considemi or addressed the potential impact on this system for the l program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response to questions 1,2, and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and l advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If itsponse to questions 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," continue with mest question. j
- 4. D Yes O No Does the system comply with the limnemg basis for separation /itade=/ or diversity?
If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part R.1 checkhsts. If "No," " ;- = as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE l TO SYSTEM. l B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperPP-07) O (Prenously discovered by NNEco, manmarne basis and UIR , CR or decovery h==rd in Step D) O (Requiremas is not fully sahnned but does not affed phyncal con 6surshon doannentahon, desiso buis or resulatoryr - Sumrnarue basisin step D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUTIS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Program / Topical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM:3 I 33 Package Sequence No. 4 f Revision 3 I F3.,,CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97 f l
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Page 34 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: i SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engineer (System Team Leed) l PART R.1 SEPARATION / INDEPENDENCE / DIVERSITY CHECKLIST l PartR.1 Review Requinment Itemi Group Status Reviewer's Signature i 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Process per PP-07) O F.. . ; discovered by NNECo, s-tse hads and UIR ,CR er diservery Ah hs Step D) l O (Regier.aseneis metainy- beid n.:as.ca physkete.ma s sena - desssa l hesis er regelseory requerummames. Summmastse hads he se y D), l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 34 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Pcge 3S ofrr MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: h ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SYSTEM: LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer ( (System Team Lead) PART S SET POINT CONTROL CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this sptem for the program / topical area during the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the progmm/ topical area within the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response to questions 1,2, gd 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. 'Ihe OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2,E3 is "Yes," continue with next question. O 4. O Yes O No Does the systers have instruments that require evah:ation for the use of correct procedures and controls to establish setpoints? If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Complete Part S.1 checklists. If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAMfrOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperPP47) O (Previously &scovered by NNEco, summerne basis and UIR , CR or ascovery documers in Step D) O (Requremers is not fully satmfied but does not affect phyncal conSguration A~= Mon, design basis or regulatory requirements. Summerne basis in step D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS N(yr APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Programfropical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 35 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 36 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: 9 ICAVP SYSR J SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Ecgmeer PART S.1 SET POINT CONTROL CHECKLIST Parts.1 Review Requirement Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT l
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (PrecomsperPP47) O (Pmieu% dheevered h MGCo,summmarke hads sad UIR ,CR or dheevery dh ta key D). O (= .
- b not h% m het does not asect phyukal comagerades documentados, design
~~" " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' '
O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I43 -36 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
I DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 37 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fn[nnaer (System TeamIeed) PART T SINGLE FAILURE CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. D Yes O No Has NNECo consdered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program? -
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?
l 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being w ed within current (1) system design critena, (2) modification process or (3) design input? l If the response to questions 1,2, Bad 3 is "No", EO *^L= as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. 'Ilie OE will process the discrepancy is accordance with PP-07. If response to sp=sela== 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," contimme with mest q==riam l l 4. O Yes D No Does the system design conader smgle failure vulnerabilities and include provision for assuring operability of the safely fr.nction with a single failure? If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPW ABLE. Complete Part T.1 checklists. If "No," diapaaseia= as PROGRAM WAS COus*DERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcouperPP 07) O (Previously discovered by NNECo, mammarus basis and (JIR.CR ar discovery daa== =r in Step D). O (a - is not Adly -e-a d but does not as.cs phymcel con 6suration "- *='ia=. desisa basis or resulatory. ' ^ Sunumarne basis in step D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE l i Progresaffopical Specialist /Date: l 1 Originating Engineer /Date: ! i
- Parsons Power G wup Inc. - !
FORM: 3 I-83-37 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLED. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 38 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPU' AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer: (System Team 1And) PART T.1 SINGLE FAILURE CHECKLIST PartT.1 Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No D NA O INF Date l
I A. REQUIREMENT l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: i C SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS i O DISCREPANCY: O (Free =sperPr47) O (Previounty discovered by NNECo, sumsmarke basis and UIR , CR or escovery h h map D) O (n ins e is met may - het a m.: assee physsents e.ma er esse w desism hasb er._, - ,. -- a--- tse hesis k seep D). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISIONI DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT I
l l l O - Panons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 3 l I-03 -38 Package Sequence No. 4 l Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 11/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 39 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team Lead) PART U STATION BLACKOUT CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area within the FSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within cunent (1) system design criteria, (2) modification process or (3) design input?
If the response to questions 1,2, ag[ 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. 'Ibe OE will process the discrepancy in accordance with PP-07. If response to questions 1,2, gr 3 is "Yes," coatisme with next question.
- 4. O Yes O No Is the system or any components of the system used for Station Blackout coping? ;
If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Comeplete Part U.1 checklista If "No," ^;- --- as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUTIS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: D 0%cansperPP47) 1.,3 ( eviously discovered by NNEco, ===narue basis and UDL. CR er discovery h===d in Stap D) O (n - - is not fbily satisfied but does not afr.e physical configuration A-- 1 desiso basis er resulatoryi@ Summarue basis in step D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUTIS NOT APPLICABLE'IT) SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Programfropical Specialist /Date: Originating Engineer /Date: I
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 39 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_Cr.1an. DOC 12/22/97 w____________--_________. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 40 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer PART U.1 STATION BLACKOUT CHECKLIST PartU.1 Review Requirement Iteen Group Status Reswer's Signature
- 1. D Yes D No D NA D INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Proe.asperPP-47) O (Pr.wisunny dise.vered by NNECe, summmedse basis and UIR , CR or discovery h in Step D) O (= . is m.e may - het d moe s.ca physic.: ._ 4.eu e a ,d is. hads er L. y reqdnunames. h4se basis ha step D) l O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. --
FORM: 3 I 40 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CILBD. DOC 12/2237
DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 41 ofxx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST ' Responsible Engmeer (System Teamlead) PART V 10 CFR50 APPENDIX R CONSIDERATION / SCREENING A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
- 2. O Yes O No Has NNECo conadared or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topacal area within the FSAR7
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the potanhal unpact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) maMicanaa process or (3) design input? !
If the response to sp=sela== 1,2, gad 3 is "No", C ""= as DISCREPANCY and advise the SLE. De OE will process the discrepaaey in accordamee with PP-47. If l response to ar==*la== 1,2, gg 3 is "Yes," ca=*is== with next g==*la=
- 4. O Yes O No Is the system or any of the system ; =- 2 required for Appendix R safe shutdown?
i If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Consplete Part V.1 ewirlista If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProomsperPP47) O (PrmoudydsooveredbyNNEco.msnmannbasisand UIR,CRordmooverydam m rinmapD) O (= ^ is not Adly minu does om ashot phyumi . da-- . a , desian basis or swdescry requiremmes. Summann basis in map D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE Prograndepical specialist /Date: l Originating Engineer /Dete i l l O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - 1 FORM: 3
- I-83 -41 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLIED. DOC 12/22/97
l DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Pag: 42 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O 1Cive SvSa SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND SvSrEu: LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fngmm-PART V.1 10 CFR50 APPENDIX R CHECKLIST PartV.1 Review Requirement Iteam Group Status Raiewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (rme=perFr47) O (Pmbusty hond by NNECo, numuhe hui. and UM , CR er encomy h h Step D) O (n sn ehm.4any sise.dn.:a m.:as.cs physic i - -
- _------ 4 ism had..eresunniory. . - sommmense ha.es h eter D)
Oc C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT O - Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I43 -42 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3.,CI1BD. DOC 12/22/97
. _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - ___________.________________ - ________- .A
l DOCUMENTID: RC-SLB- Page 43 of xx l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND l LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Fnpneer- . (System Team 1md) l PART W USI A-46 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CONSIDERATION / SCREENING l A. SYSTEM DESIGN BASIS SCREENING
- 1. O Yes O No Has NNECo considered or addressed the porantial impact on this system for the
- program / topical area dunng the initiation of the program?
l 1 O Yes O No Has NNECo mnsidered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program /topacal ants within the PSAR?
- 3. O Yes O No Has NNECo mandered or addressed the potential impact on this system for the program / topical area being reviewed within current (1) system design criteria, (2) i nwhficarian process or (3) dengn input?
If the response to Wa 1,2, and 3 is "No", Disposition as DISCREPANCY and ; advise the SLE. The OE will process the discrepancy la accordance with PP 47. If I response to quentiana 1,2, g 3 is "Yes," coatisme with next geestion. O 4. O Yes O No Does the system and/or the (-- ; = - = require seismic valihon/operabdity capability to perform a safe shutdownfunction? I If Yes, Disposition as PROGRAM IS APPLICABLE. Cossplete Part W.1 chaeltlia*= If "No," disposition as PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM. B. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA IS (Check only one): O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcemparFP47) O (Prmously escoverd by NNECo, summerus basis and UIR, CR or escovery h==ar in Soap D). O (= : ' - is not Adly - but do.s eat air.ca pbyne.1 cass uranon s > xd isabasiser resulascry. , _ Summann basis in map D). O PROGRAM WAS CONSIDERED BUT IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SYSTEM I O PROGRAMIS APPLICABLE l Prograanfrapical O ' " t/Date: 0 igiasting Engineer /Date:
- Perseas Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 3 I 4 3 - 43 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3 CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-SLB- Pag 2 44 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM DESIGN INPUT AND LICENSING BASIS CHECKLIST Responsible Engineer PART W.1 USI A-46 SEISMIC QUALIFICATION CHECKLIST PartW.1 Review Requiressent Itema Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O gr comperrr47) O erevi dy m= mend by NNECo, sammuhe hub mut UM, CR or escovery w h key D) O (negeer wi.e.e may d.e.d het de moe ssece physicaleenag rados documamenden, design basiserregeheory. , - semanute huses ta seep D) l C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l l l l l l IO l - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l j l I 44 Package Sequence No. 4 Revision 3 F3_CLLBD. DOC 12/22/97
r A i v o t D
/
i t e D p e E r V e r O a R ) P ( P in A d t e a E _ ic C d n N _ E i Y s r R Y e E b F Y- m u E X n R ' X g X- t a S _ E t n e D- n E _ T A D o p E / m o R C E W E E I V - O D E N o N O R C T
. G R O L I
O A M C s U N T E h e B T N E Y S _ TE T S A N Y O D O E E S I T A E H N / M P L : S O d I P E R M E d e A M T C E T T u T S l S A e c A O Y E S Y D v n i i D C S D S
/
R i s t t e ie O p r e so _ - T r A t n e s D N c E
. AI G e c N n
TI oA P tn G _ AR I O me S _ T .D c
- po D n E
_ N . T
*5 omSA E
. N
._ 'C 2 N _E T O _N S I
N R P T m.
._ OT E . P E S
U M E E E V O H . MHS _ S C .O D N P S .
. CE
_ O V L A H T A A T MC R _E AT _ S C C A AO T E E L I R D . TT A T L I
. SA D Ol e r E C C SC S S H r
T r I M nn e e M C _Y w et o r r r C r s
. S a d c e e e k tu sa D E h op e Co Faowo wwc o o cualC A
L _ C e ga f N T A AervPr PC P l _ r _ _ ' E _ O A c s e ro lo t V l C et na slu _ XIS L t l E H V F K S C D A n M in _ I 0 1 2 D I TV _ RE __ R M _ _A E _P A T I 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 0 1 1 1 2 3 4 1 1
1 Iijl! j ' j ,j!i
)l i!!l i! Iil!l llII 1lll) l l
9 E448 _ F E- :. oo9n9 - O X Ni1, _ 3 is 2 - ev3 E Mcen h _ u , R=Rc O r a _ _ a r FM M e g a k _ c _ a P Y Y Y-X X X-S D-E E E O D N O C
. G M R O A E G N T T N T T S N E
_ E N Y O D E E S I T A E H N I P L S O M I P E R M A M T C E T T S S S A O Y E Y D C S D S T N E 2 N T O I N R P T E U SV M E E S O H N C S O P L T V A A D T S A I C A O N L C I I R D E l s E C E C L L e t S S H r I T O n l o e n e C r r r M C S a e l n V o t g e n w k t u E h g e u s i u w c c C ta a n a g t o it a o o o fa L c ta lt I r e p R P P l r u n _ - E l e o io p :n l V C C e a t C O E W V C O D C D A In M D. X X E E_ 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 X 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 F
e n : :- n n iga n r e aue qs zoeFr na i inl pxr fhesisiir s ne rt aa at t o ne e r e uc t n hcp r rti ooa i cna ed ee h vpmeiel omt r si c l e e u d he sunsa umhwRei f c _ ynn s s _ hd l a t u aheeid t l ,
. nc al s oo"_pc
,l .
ch naCd "s cn c as . e h ce En . i ei Yt u dt t sleNo xeeh . rht d
" b )inat e nooNt ;ct h i
e d ,1 h ebyra ;- s i ni t r Tmg b ugwDew i u _ ed r e ( e q ei d wfs er .h ciefndi r4we Y e Y n asr nol een t c r . si iot neoF evba ntsa uit evc . )Ls s de Y- a qtaAcol d r a r et sc( as o _ s r n i ca3 t ,i X is .l d. rii r ,ixcc X e ei s e )r eods e9 u u imb n,h) oelpen ea se t y _ X- b t t nu s r i i b e c m g" _ _ t p2 mci es S r r mous ( _ i _ ea ny - ca _ D-t t t t a aml e d :s fepx dne: c e-r x o , ye rd rfe: oa ueef tr oi; pe E E n ah e cn qh oit Fa f ds s f t l I t ain t t of d_
- of (
- n e
.aniuh YnI a c
- e t fa:
d t shoid e i
- do
_ et i t av wCs-e uIb ."- erp sed i _ t y N o :_ i ) a t _ E at Bca ad ndulp c AP d :- rD s t o ndn O D ndI i f a e m E u :- a C,a t t ya O gn . soRbFt a ,d r N c C i sI , s b ot e nemcoISebt encCdehBe ,s s nde a
. G M R Dot u ut nDf i t
r pe po t O A E G dt bn ey) i x i eofoo n oo c en r N T T N n pi ren a2 a aet e t m (, sdekA dLr e p cy T T S N E gx ctam=t 7yecl s sc i E N Y O D nel t i r xt xi0l l nee i dna E E S I T A i syat l ( aPu h nd /p s : E nbro axhPt t f Rcn n ee E H N P r oD e ha a
/
L e xt s r T S M c r f e c O I R io)h a A A P E C M E Lsst ]r a s dC eN s npenAb "o. bi s D R s (ee l eesinlul .ni d T i T M S S T S A y c a b m e " _ oi o (s d s sgs A O Y E Y Sa ncm l i sh eie s s s n red u ,o o af e n n "o rcck:.ncrue s ee bdb F D C S D S l ae a Clae I t Np . _ncew . Eirde" cl ne Y _ oor cbf l es ndn gng Nel Npa ah s dC eN r ena iai s ege s r r s P n seea eA t a fo "o ei O o yd et a sE wP YsNl bt e dadl - O pbuhsdnR u ec l C e "e ctl aa dsd nnn T L debor t uinteeaC amsS aiI Pe A b ,pt Ne hi i t l r aea c ol i g T oit a st aDEtz s pt a n N er sp s eal a he n i e eh)Rr t yi N bt i E d ad e sht 1 (Cmbat l sf ss nin 2 N E te e nea[t t e: usDmgt S , et e T N ct h I ui nii s ss c asi c O ed)hT ee EaEtcNio3 bw) l i l l I N R P T O l siOt r l ( ss ensa nt b s os t S M E P f s( aMa o',.ceg t t l e nie U i f eir f V E M aato2CnH y as .;. ._d i noins r t ) l sss f E O H w sa(AA e- . - ame n pn iei t aoa t N S C S O o s nd T .d-ag nTl sds C i c O P L l l o hiaAtaf i
-f- _ gcl n oi )))
sss R A r i T V A T F f hC oO" : o ssyi ea s sl are y de;n t t ni s sd ((( t t t nnn O S A C A O i cE hew ac r. an eee nnn T A C hN T h o l dvrooe^_g L YS wN I I R D
- l
.Slowasl lenc at _s t h ;i ooo ppp N
L RNO esIf edf I G I T ge s s:dge y iut ;e rd mmm I M C AI T udpc t . ah a a: r e eoa ooo R E MC rf etadors:; r mF e U b e i l or
.v cCc O i be:Rol t l L MRT aaet t
staAf l
.C e t 7 a t i i )
at r _ ' E USN espe nmwRsts e u;I euPo0. h
,t t
SI h Tis" eS d ndUbbPn s i OO B
E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X X X-S A
/
D- N E E O N E O D S O E N Y C
. G M R O A E G g n g ?
s N T T N i n n r e T T S N E t a r i t a o d n ?sow i E N Y O D e p r e t a ? a ep E E S I T A o p lu d s ? c N E o c e n m i)vt H / M P L ? a l l l la? y? iz i o
? a en S O I
s ta r E R M s r la c0 d 0 d e P t o r h o n y l ? m e dn A M T C E T nf e t o t lou t r u c s a r 0 p?i ev r T S S S mn f iwdoso e p la e G et p ? A O Y E Y ue d a eh ly ? o c erp g i m o r dt c e e i ae d ) s D C S D S c n o ct t p t izrpr ion ( oo l nel a t a n e t dp nm h e dramc i ipe r t i z t a d iz e laop( r r e ip n on is i t d n r upst oo e o eh / p l a d pi a t is c g o r i t ct cpec pb r eah t p r i m a r W E ee dh t r o aet n cs pa ac d in p p d u c eio pu wrp ot r r a E d s a e l I es p r iya ioc n n s o a c od p a r V T h t s e o c t dt a e c e l h e o? r ar e y 's a t a o U ps i T E h r n l a no t n p N R B t d iwda i ly i n ba auc l
?i p in or e l t
a ? a s i a d gd t bi in a i t E E I R e el y r e plal cmc a a dal t ad s a n ib o s s yb g lenr lolo o m or o he 2 N T T r e p o it oa r l lo cu ea t b d ad n r acf t r T O gt aau r l ea e id l n? e bleiiz t nst r I T U T aq p unci c h cr re cn Dosr l o n ew t ne f N R P E B A t ae n o r er t yy or t ic s c robt e f ee nt inz a ciono y pop t is U S M I dd a i ue f df did esq uis cr oe e p V E R e t a t r o nse ee as l t n e ayh e lamve e E S O H T t ans l u c hsihoe iaie t z n u o s eet hl t et oi e i n N C S T lpio l a t at r s h o cr o et r hi s a ac r c t O P L A et a c t nl n pet c s ced see lu T V A A T ml a c u it e ui mlc s o i r pvt c o adohe h e , s t r s, oh r dint0nt c A T u c panpeyym s isad
, ,oo a at an e lc S
C C A N nl a r i coad l pr l t ri n L I D E t l c ic qapeepe ul i t zv upgnn ee e ssl rir ed o t n L I R iu e t ecmi i cr soin ss eed ep N par pofuuf vv e ip b- r g I T sa o yt ir u st r t oolef em oc - M C E O P al e o t v? h s e lpcseee pleslb ue a ar o o t wdemr oo o aaaac ap eeee r r r b ab l ae t e s est h? h L E M O t sh et d edht e s eeht s s e h ecppl eeeell a eceeeeech? et t t t et h hhhh et h e u e hhhh eeeet esc st e a r r r r h t e r oo o o ot or t t t t r o o C DDmDmIsDAIssssI aI I I r sf f f f I I I I AIsDsDA M E . . . ...... 9 C T I 1 .2 . 3
- 4. S 67. 8 9 1
. .0 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 6 7 8 1
7t ,1
_ E _ C N - E _ R E F _ E R _ Y Y Y- . X X _ X- _ S A
/
_ D- N E E O N E O D S O E N C Y G R O A M O N T E N g e e r T N E n n h t i F TE T S n is r N Y O D o y c e io n e f o t n e E E S I T A i t a n t a t a ic d e ht E c e e r u e r N H / P l L g i r h e m o M p i t _ f t d a n f S O E I R M i c r e o in g h u i a s A P T C E e p m r p in t o l a t i s p d p v n a T M S S T S S e a e r o t e o b ? A O E d m c Y Y l a n e d e c r t s ad D i D C S S i c a h t i s r o f o s s e el s i n g g n f n O i r u h c n n o n o B m d aian it i c o c e d c e e a s i t s S c a T ? u ly r a n r e n e om W E h e p o mgs an t e a t n e it o h t o c ly e ?t o mnc E t
, ri ir p
?
m p t r f o t a ee um I T m o a go nb in t Dt t V U d s e me p s o r a r c u s p p a e u q r o pt _ T E e t e e p p go s u r e pmyP r N R B b t 0 u a od peh r a s a d a t a Rcioi i r t E I c 1- q e d s n l R i E s r p 9 o r c n n a m b 2 N T e o 8t i Otn a o n a Pn t a T d r v Bi a it r Papor T O U T s p p r t ece d e Sd i r l a im t
? g no Adaf n I
N R P T B A a a t t ler r d ee e u c o epr d v eun E h du t _ n o a i hdwd S l r U M E I R ig h e icc o t l c a c n a eO t e E V O H T r a t n r e eh l r e inc n h e e n hS eB inr at d S C m i nt v di t t h i t d etch N P S T d er o ei dui s o t o is f oh e duf fe A Go f t n e d O V L A io t c he no h e lct, d? n t s t s lce t T A A T T p e t t s inn e d, r e t s ne e ce er n eo?yi t n e h S C t l C A N e s f e f it oa i e, tn n o n o n uof e , it nf od t i ror L I R D E r lu ep peml pf dil enr t c eb _ I t t p al c?el v t n moctoava no o r L N n e ino? pau a? om m T na po I o l apme/ - pse v cl av spo orp i M C O i f c oav0 o1 inmc? c c/Oev cmmRh E P f u t r e t oOryO OseBmOnoo L M s? st sdumee eeee a809l r a ueSGSsSo cBoB?BnSnoBoc e ei St i cd E ph e a aee r _ ' O eshchht oit sot tssl o al ch t at a is ast v al ahl l zh a ot i at deix pI a sf a f ef n r C I f vI cI I f cI bI r I eI f issWHI M E . 3.
- 7. 8. 9. 0.
3 4. C T I 2 2 2 4 5 22 6 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 2 3 3 3
E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X , X X-S A I D- N E E O N E O D S E N O Y C
. G M R O A E G ? g n e
N T T N d y in i o d n c T T S N E u d s
, t a n eg
_ E N Y O D ts l u c ? n t c o e a e E E S I T A ) n se l h n er o v n en o t E F t d r) e i N t i t H I M P L I H s o le fo na it b m d e s n e S O E I R M M t n? mp 7l L a di tor u u e s ( v P ( ekcr e m t s d e A M T C E T lt maico u Ps En e ag s i g u n ? es r p T S S S u ur q1 Mse i smf n n e d s A O Y E Y F a co nore ic e d er r oo d df c u i e e sre t n a D C S D S b dmcm dnd ud l e? h lp cd n t u a yt i e c n
)
ca
. d gmmii s l .
ne r c c e at a is ose en pi t f nis r e s i - t e t ey h t d u e cis e eet n ,l e nv pohei o t , el dast ma o et in W _ pa c ah o t c ia t enee t t t id r u d Imve eq E E hohf f r gt mt t n m a e I V T h g gn t h n ot h t y a o r e e o c hen ee oc N Ke ,d d u _ ph ma l t U i i i ia s c E T Hi r s ese l a x n N B iwtaw em Q h r a het e hw ea cynen r i _ R cpc2 EW t rW p tn e e n o s E I eE l t _ 2 E R i pc? n i eda e nc hC f oEr Cn m C a o n e N T T t t luwid s ai dms t S t nSio n ( s Rp m in a?e e Qar o T O Msio lac s m f r r U T l oi t r l a a oc e _ T A emn mE ug iven e I N R P B eiacice t ucr cs devi s ir u U S M E I t ilmqat h c a e duh ag t oei la ? c h he q e E R n i yn l e nr ief r e c ns utf t E V O H idl n eie? n v (s ocn sa i r? T cemt l r e S d e aced ad dh) ew1 rinnt lct i n c n so? t a N C S T i t nt e ra e? ed t c e o e cfe )t nr O P L A duu emnanse s ul uev n opt n esnl ec re s le mp lpi i e agm A d o sd heer no l _ cqi V eoaoc o nepo n aal l A a o esn p T T r smima2omd c po nt cmt sw A T ino ie cdi t _ S C C A N t t nennan t t nt sct imc a r s oine f i l eiaWi)aM el f i _ L I D E eh eeh eimoe n f h ahif uEmP _ L I R nt s nncn ysch o weh n cr et pt f y? qh ut lauq C e (e _ I T N oiooeo i t i e t silse eiqeSh cicRt M C O p ,ppmp mash nee st e chnet b vw et he t P mVmm t o nt s,oeosa uf ind l e n _ E oOoomore (s s d aa er sb ichceia r a p , a , ,c ,t en a _ L M cMccucei e eemeh dQQteQpQs t i u , ,y ,i t lpQf QQliQn _ _ ' E O h t nhhih at t int enEEf t EmEe aEeEEpEaat r nh i o o r o a t p C IsfI IssmIsAcI I f f I sI f cI f diI Inf f f I f I aI m f M
. E .
)
- 3. 4.
- 7. 8 9.
C T I 7 3 3'
- 9. 0 3 4 1 2 4 4 4 4 5
4 6 4 4 4 4 0 5
E C N E R _ E _ F _ E R _ Y Y _ Y- _ X , X X-S A
/
- D- N . E E _ O N E O D S E N O Y C
. G M R O A E G N T T N n
s s t n T N E e o ? TE N S Y O I D A i d e a ?cepm c e n o p t d e e s e E E S T E s s o m t a h t d H N I P L e t a pd o in n r e S O M I r t o se c i o c P E R M d d c e t ht a d m d f n A M T C E T a p s t c e t il wer e r e t e a o ? p T S S S ly e p t a t d? n i t c s t s A O Y E Y e r s e ey ct l e r nn i n u 0 n t D C S D S t a h t r n fe a a y ao m r f i w e c i u i h t ot c e y a q w t dr s e t t n s t r n e t i oo f a du e d l d e w t f c y e ct s ef a a m t ct n s e l i e e n W E t i s R A m ane nn ?t h at fr e efa a i b d n i l e E I i S R iy op t nm t c a n ? T d A ins n _ V U e s F S a wm e o d r yh e d e o h o?d? e ded h T E u e F e c o nf eR t r t t a i t a it eh e t N E R B I i s n h t in h e a c r m ? e pA e pm le or r i f c w tnh ielvsih pids 2 N E R o n t n lar RnFo d S r o pf r t y iss tecmlpe T T it o i cf Ai Sly eh e fe? a s aoms e cc oe T O a n u p a tsl c is i U T r t a o ird cei en Fla t a cr T nb cd t I R P A t e? t po s nt N E B ny ra it a eich ? u t t eec on ead S M ed p r a h mer cob U E I R pue a let h t r t c it w eod sre o ur t dtcsb i e E V O H T t s n t s p? oi ei t f n a h ee c a si u t c o oc e r nn s l S sunm c r eq l uuo nta - t l f C eya ie w sa n ec e lad e N S T it ic?l d o min ea nin nmr n igfyciudi ot h P A g nh l t ei O f L t edr ipt g t nt nt qe V A A inb alvcr oao c a pcvcr ahati cl n n o n isie ofeu n c aa it a n c rd l T T T e e t e s v ca syf uard f S A C A N t n oc a e /r eos n rd ac t ar h awtemud h p a c nt C l t L I m o eeipoc o lap nh L nd n E _ I R D ct la ciulaoa t l l npeuit i eeewend L c a bl ect iP r niDoni N casc a a nn loye i I T cr cmicig r qtn wE ? our d oa M C O i or t / ee pqetupr i i t r c s t s ct y n ytnyii rnt nf snndit eencMtnmremh mp E P ero hpd ah pd ahipwt s ud a racsvpah o aiconee n o el es o c e l L M leh eneneenrepeedemdt o aahl l oo spet r _ ' E O n s h uhuhhi aet dt dt t ehh b est t es ccco oemhaaat t nnn ot C I f t h Isesess r I rI I ar sosh aDcIsCCCIsDs cAI t I t I M C E T I 2 5 3 5 4 5 5..6 5 5 7. 5 5 8 9 5 0 6 1. 6
- 2. 3 4.
6 66666 5 6
E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X X X-S A
/
D- N E E O N E O D S O E N C Y
.G M R O A E G s N T T N n t
n s N E t o e _ T T N S O D e s i t p n a E Y o l l I A , i p e E E S T E n o r c w H N I P L i s m s M t p e o a S O E I R M ir d c A P T C E c s r e m?sh, t T M S S T S e b t et i nw A O Y E d m se Y , y smde D C S D S r e u n ut b g e ca hoi? m a t c u n t h d os ed t n cegsd a n a nu t W E 0 a e n mat o I E t t n o p h nr s ceg V T e m e r nmd T E U n o o?n ugpn N B c odis i a u R p? mneie t ce qd E E R I oit oha od t nrdl ee l 2 N n a la t T T c ah cep t T etnt mnain c s O U T he a o uist r I N R P T A t hmmct B o cnc oeli y S M E e U E I R t cusd a ce or ei pt let s a r a E V O H T md dginhq ue nd eu S C N P S T se egca endet nmod e O V L A A r n oh u ar c amS a T A A T T dh p ecy ngnceoCe c' f l S C A N c eCs L C I D E onci r gn sar t R pi se en e gd e 's r M r, eni I t L N m I T rded nir r t n e a n M C O ad ma au eg op E P l aneta n mtch acm L M hte eief t _ - E t nthoh pt nwcuio O oiot o o e a s e C DpDsDmIsh t E .
- 9. 0. 1.
C r i 8 6 6 7 7 2 7 l l !
Y _ Y . Y- _ X _ X _ X- _ S _ D-E _ E _ E O D N D C
. G M R O A E G N T T N T N E
_ T E N S Y O I D A E E S T E H N I P L S O M I P E R M A M T C E T T S S S A O Y E Y e D C S D S t a D _A _T _ _A _D _T _ T _N _ N . _E _ E _N 2 N _O T O I N R P T _P S M E _M U V E _O O H _C _ E S C _ N S .L O P L _A A T V A T _T A _N l
)
s _ S C A _ ( s L C I D _E _ e c i t n L I R _M N
- o. n e I T e r m r M C e e o E
_E t u f e m o t a L _ P b R C n _L iG i P r _ - E U A t t a b i O r S 1 D
P A i v O t _ D
/
i t e - D p _ E e r _ V e r O a R ) P _ ( P in A _ d _ t e a E ic C d in N E _ s R Y r e E Y b F m E Y- u R X n ' g X _ a X- t t n S E e _ D- T n _ A o p D C I
/ m o
R C E _ W E E I D V o O E N N O R T C
. G R O L I
O A M G s U N T E N e B T N E Y S T S s O D A t N Y I A O E E S T E H N I P L C O M I P E R M E e v A M T C E T T t i T S S S A t i d: e e A O Y E Y D p d e u D C S D S
/
R r p c l O oi n T o s _ A A t e D n oi E AI NG r e L n s N o s O T TI P ec G R E ARO mc S A E I T E D C P D H e N S T h O B t _ O N S OL A E I 2 A C T T N S I R D A OTE N N U S A D P E E V P MHS 1 2 n e e ee 1 2 o n n ii nn n o ) N S N O O D itaLi Li LL i t a P O c l O O CE i c )
)
o T o V T I L H f
)
i o D N/s U L _ T A A MC e e l s s l a uN a A e P T g
/
e ) s S T E AT A e g n Qs/ R, Y U n e ( L C T N TT T p n n C l t ec R ( O aR gn ion t nYmA i L I N E SA A y a a c e( s S a P t I E N Y D T R hC im m t t poegi Fb le P O )(s r r t c en t M M n n c s r a r e e t S ( O S e e ei iuP e q r S, ei pr O o u S k) t U P N A mmE u l ur rSr EQ H R, 9.N 7a L t a p mlo (t c _ - R M T t r t t t rE 1 e r T, G p y i c mr a tr A n o t ei O s s s s s d o T O XI S n n n n n eP p( RT l C AInP S I o 1 2 D I I I I I I N C T V I RER M A E P A T 1 2 3 4 5 I 6 7 8 9 0 1 1 1
!lIjl jj)ji s t s C437 i
s I r s I :. n9 aa Xoo 9
- ee X
I
- s d po a 3Nll o 1, F
O bn n oto nn: a 1 d t e
- ev7 Mce1 t
gns e a l si g 4 :- a . e RnRr 2 ioe g s- : hd h Oue be _ et cnbpa s i eas eew t e s Fq e m M P fgae da n elau r l efbe :e n d,d -:- sin i
- no t
t a a S e e c e nl fhq : roeFr an d G D l i pesi : i r t o e s xr n _t r t at r ri e k re u ;aa c ne t t m o e c n iadhvFmeielsi e ee mtn cp hooac a s P l nsa ee u d hs umhwRei n ss f e hd ueel i sucs yn c al a h t t, lcaha dno, o tnnhc l t n
"s n c cas h a CE-d. enp e c e o ei dt t i
e Yt
" uInatstsNk pct b) e ne sN oeehrht h
f l u s d e d ,1heby
;oDewmini s t e i r
ed(Tmgb r c e r e u q eied e n cie.hnd C. o lr4we h e Y wfsr a sr t c t r newFeen siiot uit vba s de Y nta qt a s et aAcol ev . e t sdr d e ar Y- s srs ne )r i ca3 )L u ,i X i i
.l sc(
riir ,ia c xc so l c du eq tetet i m eodsyoeea n , X X- aunu b n yh2) pen l i d se s r ri b e ousut c m glsp( mci n es t i i 2 t r mdneoc ea ny a ca t t t e : p o D- a aml ediepx vf yee : r o rd pe ne ah oa cnoitqh ueef t rf : o C ptrofa r oi i_ f l dss I Ntt l aint
.and uh Ynf e_t af ::
i t of(d : t n e n a ce shodewCs-et t av yN oe- buI."_ i i i m u do er sed i t
- i) a r t p o
E at BcaadndulpA P d-t rD ,s t s ndn D a c emEu- aCa t t n O O gn i adirsoRbFt f a ,I I e ya c N C l eI s botencCdehB : t e nd G R e nemcoISebt i r p :
, l p a po e
t O A M G Dot dt bn i u ut ey)ix nDf n sofoo-t _ m en E o- o N T N n pi r et n a2 a t dL - r cy T T T S N E aet ct u = m (, sdeekA F c a isc _ E N Y O D gx nel abxi0lt7yecl l i l nee s i s dn
/a E
I A i syat r xt aPu hnd a sp E S T nbraxhPt ( : e r fo etx ro Rcn D e an t E f s ee E H N / M P L a e s r T S O I R oo h senAb c a a c A M C bi s l P E L s )s t ]ra np s .d heN "o. f D A M T C E T Rs1e i t eesinl ul (" r e .n/ d T S S S Ay : abmst c e n i o o t n sgs A O Y E Y Sa-l c eshsd I eie sss D C S D S Fn-o a ._nni m "o, du omlus ee n r p e ccrke r o aea cl a
- i t N incew r s bdb Eiade"Yuoor Nel cl nedCqcbf n l e s i e
r d ndn gng ah e ea o e iai L P Npa no yd e t wP YeNl bt ear o see as r N e rf "o ei s t r e s s e i r u q s ege s dnd O T O pb u h a sE t c e i E O ut e cnteeaC l sdnR CNe s "e au cb c a r dsd nnn R E L daiamsS e t orai APe bt,hilptra i g n s a aea c - T H ni I DEiiaz s pt s glig T e i N ert t a sta r se w inyi n N btade sp eh)Raal o t r 2 O S A E d e e a [t ue:sSD m gtss e hn 1 e s h t ( C m b a ht, l l l o o s s sf ss nin C N t ct t I f e e et o cac T T ed)hT bw) uiniis l c i sl I I N R D A O l eeOt EaEtcNio3 r l ( ss sa
,nt sen b h
t c a l s os t N D P slf(taMa s t l fot t ceg f ot : p e nie U SV A h eir)Hy rt aato2Cn seel nninn ois yne n o o i f sss f E P l w ssa(AA ammdpn n amu l i t aoa ei t N S N O O o aginTl nd T .due ecir amo r r
)
s /o r sds P O O C l l o hiaAtaf i oun oc l et ds n ( t d ))) O V I T L F f r o O "t : o i sdqgcI syr eiedvn i sI i n o n a sss ((( R T hC ee s sl are yd s n t t t O oss t A s nnn S A T O i cEThew ac vr eia i t )s )s p r e eee nnn T A co ec (r s otod(eu t(s b L C T N : hN hol l do oeeg t n r e) u t ooo N N YS RNO wN .Sloenc at es l I t h pi L E i ppp I esI ahs f edf wasl l aprcoar pmt r mmm G _ ydeolcmr I E N ge s iut re e a cr e e ord yd g t I M M AI T udpc t . a a l l i a a ooo R - U O MCil be etadsanor t er mF r e ir wam nRCA I r e CCC O P MRT U rfiaAf t st l e pR o i).v l l Ei r h t _ ' R M US espe t at r aeetibreCnmcsRst ,t s t s4 7a h Op e d o C T O N h s e ui euPo t h e d O S SI Tis" eS d ndUbbPn I Tth a b c. d.A D. _ C I _ X N I X C
. lm _
X _ B 3 F
i G r A O P E C N E R E F E
- R Y
Y Y-X , X X-A S / N D-C I O N E O D S O E N C Y
. G M R O A E G e c N T T N c s e n i
m T T S N E n a i r i n s E N O D o d t n g i e Y I A dr ? s e e s a E E S T E o c y c e r s e i f n is e r o m i H N / P L c n u c c d o k o a M a in e p u d c t S O I a e t c p e n a o E R M g r? es a s h e t c pt p e r A P T C E in r e p m im o t v / e t c in t o g t p c T M S S T s m mel no o n h e or s e A O E S s e s i em it h p e p Y Y a tem d l d lv h t g w t p r s D D e l C S S c d n /re cu n n a v s in e c h u s h r c uo a t t a a i,d n i i h sd e s n s lu a w g w t im l a s ni z e io e n t i n c t s v dr c it e w ie m er gs l t a e i n o n n m t r a u L T W E
/
l s a o n pisg n en v?ts etn ms un t c c a dr a o R e m O E ldn o e m? A i c gd b r o m R l st e E l I T a iseu uns in c e S R E V ir t c e eh t i m tr io in m f u c h F A T E U le r u dt h e s n u st ac icp naeo c t r o a t e S N H R B e s miu t l mo l p p i n i s h t F e O S I t a ewp? d dfi i d u d d in h 2 E R n e e t sem yei n ai n n sd g ni lt n aec u g? s e le t C A T T n? m sr t
,s s,ps m ink s
/ t n f l
n? n ioei T D T U T o pist o egp mtnes g h aa h dt eoiar c u o le t inn I N R N A B A mst an t u ed ingi tet as so cv ,he it pk h a a inw t er a m u q al r agt io? D t U S obe a t t ly pi n r uai A I c pn n ni ic p V P R egf od ce d nt wh fi g/ a
,pc t heo e l a esad snpn E S N T hi su f
lego rn goi ngr t s d n o ic eeo O t l N t apidw in iwl at e assc O T e es vt n s ipi n p m c rl r O P O A t a de e ee e ow e p b o ecn m? si s inoao T V I T L T icd n n g t mhdlbngc/umcriu t ema nt c o t ot e c ne s? at ic t A A d a ar n af e ani h o em s d h nr nce ce t S T N In gt enoh g n lt ndr bt :dl emie C o et n t L T N E Lnn? oiotnhibo uh
- r t
h etnli mueu r f i emlem N Ps espuiiu c it a cd e I t L E i c n n sie u an u asas r r N l t l i t I E N Enm embt u a wt cewn as oaa o p? ee ,q oqcncn M M O el s aca Mcreul v cst ne eclsn eeinu e i lupcdi e nl a cmtnagml sl r b i pys i is i y n ytn O P it r a pd ma n te di o ecno l t ahpdahpd a U P M h t henshh ist t o d mleid ut a mlpn ne n c i cic
' R M O ehhc eeh oiahoero nh st eesser l
uch e upu it emenen hsh uh d u T O oi t t o oots cetst cr ns cmoet c aot it dt S C DwI spDDI aAiI r aI mmI cdI mI sI f s orI rf f e sese N C i I M
. E C
- 0. 1.
i 1. 2 3
- 4. 5.
l 2 3 6 7 8 9. 1 1 1 1
_ P E C _ N E _ R _ E _ F _ E _ R . Y _ Y _ Y- - X _ X _ X- . A S -
/
N D-CI - O N E O D S E N O Y _ C
. G M R O A E G t o e N T T N d le t
n n e ? ht t T N E e e s n TE S e ge l e l
- a a f t N Y O D A
t s m m h t t n b i ( n e imn E E S I T n a u e ly e c d r uu H N I P E L i s n t r s t a r e m t e e s mt es dc o M t n c p n u r e S O E I R M tl o? n e i i d o o l, e c iut de d A P T C E ps n d n In r p ir v t a t q' d dQ M T pi o e e r e r oE T S S S u s y p a L d n n e P e, i ce e A O Y E Y sl a m s p P E a n o, t Ql f i rht D C S D S dn o a o c i n Ea u e ui n n a c M d o a t e i m eq rO0eh e t
/
S r a a k d u s _ go h e c N O a lad _ ian t t f M d o 7 e, ves L _W bi tueiyt t r r sh aisc o n M P is n o lee sL x, a i t r im ir *e h iou ns n e st t c O T E E heriel ctr nama o e c aB o K et las
-- VR E I i i
t a h n cA C ru n ud i R T t en gcas c t e t sC m, d se s T E E U ri yy abbb g e o s e b e ? oL rI s a e e re c in nd N H B ,u n l e d o e g ewP P h h c op t a n ae c r e S I d t dd a h f y pr ed O _E R ielal lee l / r s t m, i l n kcth A s u? a en ni e 2 A t _ l c of C T T i mtaae f u a ig arf pfo I, snR t co pt i
-UB le n t
T T T lar u e ssl r g s la es ni t me D nn a e ndc e e na aa f I N R N A A qhI ly/ t I v e r o r? p d t en s o ph e nru od ci D e eieD lamu e n Qamses ml c e? c t ig U S A I i r r f nf e R i lam u un uar c os E V P c s d do Er r cue i ia o mc n lbe ab S N O
. T ime i
c e eis e oe cs hmv o qm rc cee t s c) N -T o dt b eh ic t P O O .A s s r oe r r t pd Qen us dt l ed mse O V I T L iee sh p pp n ei e np i hif En og eth lp s ilve t na l ut T A _T is h: t n ou iei m ( S A T . N t it e i o is istn la epnfi i wd e et s v n i no aoniuh mdl u aefi C nwn t t / t imta i L T N . E e a r h q t cli ei r I N neO b r r et be nol u aa pe? eu l L E .N i ia z no iwh e i c c qf r u n h E ock e i e e q )? et h sotnhm l l I N pn c a d i
.O t
M ae c co r pt n stehsvtne let et ss i M O _P _ mdh or e e f meant onhes ioho nairb a ,ca dduhn ooar gc at U P - M coC c h t h t t nco u ,m ,i , , gk , e
- ' R M 3c s?e s o epQuQdQdQl QQiQdi it ,t i
f T _O ha et e ch mEcEnEeEpEEnEcct oao O _C ctdIf o cIf uI aI o f o s p o c t If in l S DpDaI cI f f f f I cI fapi N C _ I _
-C .
4 1 5. 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1 0. 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 4. 2
E _ G i O r A P - E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X , X X-A S N
/
D-C I O N E O D S O E N C Y
. G M R O A E G t t s
n s N T T N n e e
? n t nd y N E d m e n i
t s T S O D m m e z ss d e o ma f en t N Y I A e e li t f r eg a io ars E E S T r ir i e a r r st a u n nt o i t E u u c n e iui hl H N / P L q q so w qiz t o os dic S O M I e e n r im o es nda P E R M e r r e o p r e p r r bi r) aef,sn A T C E h h it d ce t e l a de ede t uo T M S S T S t t et t s v ne wt f irt i e oa r iofe A O y nl a ? i Y E Y t e f n e pn doa ) e is ne c ,nu l s D C S D S t or i b e t c , nn i od r yoc ( m a c y a r ci t at a .i n l s s t c p uo t o sf e do it f i r t s o ec t e u c n ceep )t o s e i s ea cs s e l
/
o h e su (c cu cf ht he mr o e o t t d L T W E d d o r o pt ? c or t n e gr o np ise i f ay peo t f s a O E d, t n t np n lsl e i ofaye o s nh r? dl a na
, t n o it t i
E e e I T e d r R E V s u e n ed d e p ou pc aq u l acapbole T E U s u dnpo nt m pi r pe t ea f N H R B i s s e pm ela pe c o uc s r am(At r it ti ar n S I n i er e f e laa t r sa? e os 2 O E R o n o eo ? d c Rnt d y h og t ivs, nla e n h C A T T it a it in m Aief ? s t et a Cc e o/r uot mte di nr are T l r a D T U T t e r eo Slya s e lbo av Ai v eaeaf s o A Fla s no I t R A t r r N n e p Ve duclpt o us t N D B e n af
,d ce ed eih mt,? c a da 0 d t
ocr xip U S A I p e t e h r ne o 2d t a pE x n V P R t n p n n t t t c o uc acr eg ml, 1 et t soe c ei nn E S N T e t n dai a th let odu ea x t N O T m e nt nw iel a d n o si n t h le ie d n *o ioo ea *n luu aa i O d a el sn ndu s ui t t t r P O A n? m yd my O V I L iaRn em cn eigns iQe r Sa sr ew lal
)s sl
( uier l l T T T t nAai r o otfe n svecc A A l r oSt isn a nt es f opr wlaa S T N n t io dau dio i s t Vu? a t o su nscc i L C T N E cF o c nt a r h p ocn er c t i ienCoie t p h n b n ds o e- n a o r ann lul t t L I N E N lad
?sianc nla?
t t t f o? c r o ,i i yoo E icRopa nac nt n wneAt ar n ndl o el pp I M N O a is a1 rA p e nd nceepnVtcaods cy od e afcp M O P ah1 cSmsin b c 1 t onme0epmn u )o i n pe a s t na ass npeet t U P n leF ogsu paop2 ssm deDar t n g emG e e eiir i nr M cnt de emdr c de1 et o eiae h _ ' R M oo en eri cte u c (s t ens st T O is a Rnhat f h wb ecchih hc ave i cie ae o or e O r al t e t s ct f n s it S C dI foI oIf f f s ar cAI aI aiwicirdDumdDA f e e o n C I N I C 8 6 2 7. 2 8 9 2 2 0 3 3
- 1. a.
2 3 b. 2 3 2 3 c. 3. 3
- 4. 5 3 3
P E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X X X-A S I N D-C I O N E jl I l.lI O D O S E Q 1 N C Y M
. G M R O A E G s s o R N T N d ee d t A T N E e s c re e h d S
_ T T S b a oh t a t i e F E E N Y O D i c r y c ,s r d le w t a e E E I A re pt n r e n S T E s e n e ec ea t a y c h H N I P u n t pev i L d g t hh s t e im n S O M I s r e t t e a r i it, b? P E R M a md inh c r f a dr e d i l A T C E m u s o t e ha T M S S T ? s len e o co n h t i s u
?n e d e c c
d n b i in S [i w c h a a? r di A O Y E Y b ig a r d n )t sa t d e ioo t o n o s c l u D C S D S n a a (l o or t r m in t ie o om g ms ei nr ( e cp n e o r d dc d t w s r n l f a s fu h f e ens t a e o it a t syi de nn t R t a cua af hi a r s r si f gr a det h A n fr yn t t e e L T W E t uu pl a p o da eu l is 9l t y di nw S F imr t et ee nf aon t i u c O E t uv , t a q oe et n e?tse iysp r/ R E I V T o e t s l e e lae t t ine hr t em ic E U e r s y u np l eis t t ot r eh o n T E dh t a m ht u ap pt c io N H R B nt ah t e t
- es n o h s t n t
ict wiu om/p t S ytc? i a a c r o r a end o _ I f t pr o O R an o c oo u/ E DaRr p se rl ea f cit sf l t 2 C A c T T T T lomAo o y Sr
- n no op fs n nig d e ieg n nl e a en t r uee a D U T d cFp p n as f a dniab pph e A o ar a t t A
I r N R m r i la rr opa uof h N D B h ru o r eo t e u cl c ot o t U S A I t e cn h e hc rh qt o cos sd se n in V P R mcot t o s
/
e ot eis s? s a c ar s n nce t eiir o s E S N O T n ai ai nt "o c t at,h t r od i io o cut oq c t c a N T iod c t dc r n O ua an e e p? prr ue f t nid t iv? lo n O P O A t laaie f ) eR s op ici o I u) ect c sd id nh dts dtny c V poS toa eur dInl(? T L t
)s T c (s ple? urA es intotlae A T iat et ne et e r S A T N l
t st erl t mlamfa he C T N anSfe ci olat eu u(o r r )c. F e d e laf iadntnase eps L E a ape m e r uri o r t t I N t t s c c ud L E N npcnd s eh sl u oeo m ni nyoty qe y I E N O iopshe pc t i i nocoi e e r,tnir o t bl mu ob t ede/ier n a M M c o atad h omlot ciafanaeu? f O P t e ee epri t r f f r not etc) retn cod ar ss esevr ev e c s Q s c qd eie a r U P M shTs t ecbit i i e _ ' R M. eseemt ni r n ucw r se in onceg o hinpeh ec ehe t dt dhieet h O T O h ot t ehh a oi ne t l ns abeet ar r ssoe s e s r r h e e r et h cre _ S C IsDiInsaDadI / f caAI dI pat At h s I aAa N C - I _ M E 67.
- 8. 9.
- 1. 2
- 3. 4.
7. C T I 33 3 3 0 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 6 4 4
P - _ E __ C N
- E R
_ E F _ E R Y Y Y-X X _ X-A S / N D-C I O N E O D S )? O E 0 N C Y j
. G M R O A E G a s e N T T N i v ? e h t
7 T S N E ( d
)
n g n r o _ O l l 8 N Y D e a w o a f I A h n r
- h is E E S T E s o d o t n lt i
i n c s H N I P L d i l i t k o u a e a M n p c l r, c b o b S O r I R M d a m n a e n s b a P E n o u w b o a w a A M T C E T a r e c f d a m e m
- l o dr e T S S S r
e b c a n ivt ? u sn d e e t r n a s u A O Y E Y b m a ( sy n s s h t o h a D C S D S m u n b e r e de s o ga e h c c dr c r u b h e it t r n a n g g a s n m ish t at d n? d d t a i a o o a t o u lpw nen a m m b l t i n eno s s b mo l t o L O T _W
.E E t
t n e n n e n o f c n u t g a oll cf c o moi m oe o pa t t e mtn bu du rp e r t i e a t r n o ia r a v p g t a e s c c R E I V T ? p o m n n e er e cm a i t t r e c o r r s s T E E U ) 1 m o c i t a n o b ud reh eu c o r p p / o e c H s p o N R B r o ec e r e p sn ec nhdct o r o? y c a d n r O S I R ve h p o m o o act n cDn t e a p 2 A E oh t o c it r nt cp e ai anie h ic? t n C T T 2 t h c m e n n t n mo f p neg r l h t gr a T D T U T cc h t a e h u f io ist c loo t d anu a ee ab e t A t s A I R t a wlu N N B imta m y h lac t mr s mlam m o U S D I ism s s c r e u ud e l med V A R e s s e y t a up sd r o hn/g w lair m an P e r c d s 'r e/ e o s E T ( u n m en ecd a S N O T s u r d e s ci r ur on e st ea i ? i v t e t N P O t id ue e c g e od pna c p a r t t sr yue r st enr o t h ch ist e O V I O L A d c no o r r e r u an n e fuitoi o n sd p urf xof f o T T T or p m d e eo cr d etn at A A cp e e wcnt ar mi er S L C T T N N E r g on y c n e d e c o r d a t onarbahoo u n mbi epa o a;r t r t cer r ot s ief nt di L I N E N sti D ib p h e) l i a c a al,lupu l a rano I E N bea? r e? r r c? m r? s n t (s c ,e em nimim hocpmd M M O u en pomo ne s) it nl aonto ans nlbasos
/
t er O P t e oieidwaih meeiape o o r e? mom coz U P seieiad t p t eia t nt t c , h h h rc eoeipist r lpf lot nainc pl o l pl l R M l uh ct r h rc h ph cpnsr o e sis a _ - T M O p t s s nlk t s nt mt s a a etn et cebl l i S O C m o e o e aao e ao o o bDcDsDtoWF iDdDdCwDdCDcDdI e f ooooeo N C I M E . . . . 3.. 5. 7. 8. 9. C T I 9 4 0 5 1 5 2 5 5 5 4 5 6. 5 5 5 5 0 6
P _ E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X , X _ X-A S / N D-C I O N E O D S O E N C Y
. G M R O A E G e d N T T N h d i c n a T N E t n m a
_ T S D t ea s g s E E I N E Y S O T A en n e i e s n a m d a mo E e i b e e H N / P L it b h u t r
? t a
S O M I R t n ei c a i t t s d p e e P E M e? cd w ss u r r . A M T C E T o ni f ol a ue e lca r ( e t e 7 0-T S S t p u oic f nd b A O Y E S Y r o mq s is na y i o is n d P s o u P rt t D C S D a o l S n iad t cep as o fe r a c o l e l h _ s ey dec a s t s n h s w t i n e ht eb c m t l t a e e n e sa !ao _ o e ie b ioc ryi noddinht t en L T W E f d r og di,s en h yt t t n s a ed O E e e e, t t ec nyo t sa li ur R E I V T t s l fa u ho a n qo c e sfn ob u e bg T E E U t an pc
,it is c h a N H R B ly iar a r ad mtr on t o des S I t
n vo s etio p lou _ O E R e 7t t ad hn ip s ep f t es 2 C A T T d n e 9. c e t
,t e , u ht o
o se nc _ T D T U T p 1 p n inds e et fl o n oo I N R N A B A e?Ges deh ui ssr tr o pr sp U S D I dtnRr n ict s f at e rdn V A P R igne at h i i n owie eh pc e ea n o sw E S N T al ct isf f v it y O ipa ga ut r o l N O T e bmR9 7 n o o s t e n) a cn O P I O A oA 1 iwt rstn es me r ma V f _ r p T T L T o cS lop oai em if e S A A edFG e eR et le e f a rc _ T N lbr lool de C wam ns f L T N E auhf de er Ad i L I N E N pst o a an s ir et lau eh r t i q loi d E f I N cei t pmdn?n qf u or e ym ) M M O o/ee y g r r a 1 O P oe a e ( eimirdt i ?is i U o df en mt r _ P M l t nreas t t id efat nk r : s _ ' R M O ea hudqeiar upiv r i s ua pn w e _ T O ts tci aI re sI aor aoea r e fpI mbI d f o t o S C I f f N N C I _ M E . . . 4. C T I 1 6 2 6 3 6 6 5 6
_ C4 7 9 X 9 X 3 1 F 7 0 K 1 9 R r e
. O b F
_ NA m e c P e e g D a k c a P Y Y Y-X
- X X-S D-C I
E O D N O C
. G M R O A E G N T T N T T S N E
_ 5 N Y O D E E S I T A E H N I M P L S O E I R M A P T C E T M S S T S A O Y E Y t e D C S D s a D A T L A O T D R E T T E N N H E O S N 2 C A O T T P I R D A M N N U SV A D O C P E N S N O L O T P VO I T O L A T ) S A A T N ( s ) s L C T N E . e c ( t n N M No n I L E e I E E o e m M N r e m r o M O L u t f e o t a U P P bri R C ig n R P t i _ ' T M U t A a b O r C O S O S D. N C . X X I 1 I C_ X D 3 F
v r _ A i t o D
/
h e D p e E r _ V e r
- O a R )
P _ ( P in A - x d e _ t a E ic C d _ n N Y _ i s E Y r R e Y- _ b m E F E _ X - u n R X _ g X- _ _ t a - S _ E t n _ D- - T e n A o E D p _ C / R m o E C _ W E _ E I V D E o _ O O R N _ N C T
. G R O L M
I O A G s U N T E N e B T N E Y S _ T T S A E I N Y 0 1 D A O E E S 1 E H N I P L S O M I d: P E R M E d e A C E M T T T u S l T S S A c mi n _ A O Y E Y D u se D C S D S
/
R ei O p or mss T _ - A t n e D AI NG e c c E n A N _ TI o P tn G ARO _ I me S o n E T _D C
- po D N -N T *5 omSA
_ E -
'C
_ 2 N _E T O S I N R P T __ OTNE E M _PE S U V O E _ MHS E H _ S C O D N P L S -
. CE O V A A H
_ T S A C T . MCA E C A E T A P T V AUMM I _ L N D TT . M L L I A SA P t f P A i s DPG d, G V ss p _ I c _ M H Y , q , a s, e s s C S y
. R w l A
t _ _ i c f HF o t C er e E . l N T a p H , S I S P k e o M O A a D P in f f r v p N A Di S C T y t
. XIS I 0 1 2 D C T N M
_ TV
- _ RER M - A E P A T I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
1 1 1 2 1
m s t E437 X i s rs 9 s i F O ao l d 0; ee po M :o. no9 XNte 1, 2 bn n oto n n-a ,d
- d 3
- ev7 l
c e1 E gns e e a sle _ s ahd. g et MnRr Re e s oe easleo ;e i _ m i c . st te Oqu 6 n r tet a nbpa : c sn o Fe o r au_be d, f oin hn el l ef S c l gae nl pf h q :iirzoepra n e n r o g D e i esi- n : rt at t o e s xr h ne o on r e u :aa t e ee mtnhooa r ri t cp c P c a l adhvFmeielsi unsa f d h o umhwRei f hdee t
,cs ynn s su s l
c al a "s ueel d ootnn hc t, lcaha n t ncchaC - en ep c e ei dt tas i E-d,
" uInatstsN sN^ kpctrht oeehh Yt d b) eheby ne s e d ,1 . mini t r ed(Tmgb r
eiede hnd C._ r 4 w e oDew c e i u q Y wfsr n a cie sr ol t c e Y siiot nt uit neRFeen vba r . s de a s a qt ov e ar Y-s sretn .I ca3 aAcol )Lsd r l t ,i X i i e e )r sc( riir as oc do X e tel eods ,ixc eg X- t munum b n yh )yoe t 2 penea l se sr S t i b e ousut i c m glsp( i mci es ca tr t r mdneocpx ea ny D- t a aml edievfyee ; er ; t o, rd E ne oa n ueef t rf ; pe M ahc oitqhpt rofer oi 4 f dss ftl I ain t - of(d- . n e
.aniuhiYnf t
shoide et t av d t wCs :; etuI af: : ac do sed i i yNo-e .f er t p E at t _bi ) a o BcaadndulpAd- c P t :a - t trD s ndn O D i a emEu ,a N O ndirsoRbFt gn f a C ,d ya c C i sI , e nemcoISebts botencCdehBe ,s s nd a e
. G M R Dot uut xnDft sofooc i
rpe poe O A E G dt bn ey)i i t n oo e r n N T T N n pi re t n a2a aet (, sde dL r p cy T T S N E gxct u = m ekA is c _ E N O D nel abxi4ineet7yecl e dne Y l l i A l rxt aPW Rcn i E E S I T syat t ( hnd n t sp : E nbraxhP tD f ee E H N P e ha a I L e rbe x t r o s r T S O M I c io)h I a c A P E R M Lest]r npsenAb a e C d "o. bi s D A T C E R o (- l te eesl nlul " eN .ni d T M S S T S Ay l abme' cm c ;.i o s- o (s d sgs A O Y E Y Sa-Fn i _ nnd u "o, or us ee sh cr eie sss D C S D S o a ,
. l
_ ckn e ae a bdb cl a 2. d e " Y: ncew Np i t Ei oore s ndn gng _ cl ne 4r l Nel ah dC N cbf ena iai Npa s P n see a t seA f . o "o r ei s ege s O o yd e t wF YsNd le dnd pb u h a sE i t i c sdnR C s "e aa dsd l O u tenteeaC Nra hl ct nnn T L duiamsS At t
.pt r i i aoa c eboraiI Pe a gIl g _
N T oi r ot sp t e sta DEiirz s pt Rr aal s r s inyi n _ E N bt d ade e sht eh)Cmbai 1 ( l sf ss nin N E e ea[te: S t t, 2 e hn usDmgt et o ic snac t I ss T O N ct ed)hT bw) uiniis l l i P T O EaEtcNio3 ss sa l r sde I R eeOt ,nt b s N M E P sf l e(taMa t l l fot (
, sen ceg e U S E e i r )H y o e e t
lnninn i r i f ssc t V O M rt aato2Cn oi E S C H O w sa(AA smmdn pns i t ei aoa t N S o s ag ndi nTl T .due e ci r ame sds P L C i b ohiaAtaf l l oua oic ))) sss O V A A F f O r "t : o o d q g c. d l syrele .n l ((( t t t A
'O T T hC ee s sl a s. y de; t
a nnn S A C O cE Thew eee T hol l acd-- roe A i 2^ n nnn A L C N I I D YS wN
- hN
.Sl l oen--_t ath ;i g ooo N L : s ppp I I A RNO esI edge f f w a "- ut aho o y-l ge rd a e mmm G I
M H AI T udpc t . s s ;re e o a ooo R O C MCU berf t ett ads-i l ert e ;Rol orr mF e
.v CCC E
l _ - MRT at aaet t t i e r aAl ib-:C s t7a i) O M US espe eS e nm u;IwRets
,l
- 0. h t O D
SI NTlh es" dndUbbPn i euPo OO X-X E M,
. X B 3 F
1
E C N E R E F E R Y Y Y-X X , X-S A D- I N E M O N E O D S O E N C Y
. G M R O A E G N T T N f o o T N E
_ TE N S Y O D t n e
?
n s r g n
?
t i f
? d t
A o ? 'o n e e i I t E E S T E d sd n e v g r s u H N / P L i c c it a nn e m l a n o m M r oe v n v ip e t n S O a s I R eiv ia ip ht e r e E M y pa t d e e m P n A C E ollahe g t r i M T T n a a t n r e fo y b a T S S S r
? pt st t
g e a h t b s A O Y E Y o lemne i n r h c f o c e d e ?i a n m r D C S D S f d vuie leppm l l i f ia si n an t a at r o r d f e emps mt r o g g r t a r t s u ? cu ui f o n is m r t s d e s n w iokin r e e o Ro e c s oit n umio e - d ? a a t d fr o Ap h W n io s axlud iv e e e m Sl / t o sm h p e g a er a l E E dnio/r t i nm md r pgo t r d ? d Fro I T m oa n oe n h n t i T V U r o ot c c t uuf ond ed st raf m nuo o f i r e uq d ie e e t i o wco l E f r ws u ed r f N R B e p ioop af t a e i l a b t n e u r s etw t t E I e lomrdi v cd u ev r q e u q n t 2 N E R h f t ur ivo r dt n s u e h e t se isv? T T t umfoor r p ts n ees d t ae ly n na er de T O U T d n oi nine p ne n int xev e r g a t l a o p ohua I R P T A u umau ee t eer p p n r c c sie l N E B o r c r r i t im o m ea U S M E I R b t t aaqb e eb n n ot. eov a neg t a r n s s c eifr i d c eev V O e o i ddd no e e n slgro tencan m c e _ E S C H T n eeaoi i t dd c u em r s v i a minnp N S T a inarr or n c t t iir ce t e a r isr a d o s P L A m vv eet o a e na f r e O V A A r o oo r r ppor p wt or mtnpee d e p m a b fo f r e v at T A C T T f r pp w?s ri i t oapc mg r t ny el pat he r e HHe S A N p e eor ei t t nn w vip _ L C I I N D E p SSswlongmnt r PPoof ion it etr pioor t
/
ep ni ob l eo n e L A N m NNhf l mtaat c r pa r nio v t i I u ee r eud rf up uT7nop? me pl oat ol vl _ M H O p t t aavr e? uuieieppe esmneo a sm? sSt sI e co mso a C P hi sqqd r vim n mh pepi uf mnnohheeico soisen i h et E M er emr n s t s ee s. t t r t t ye wr y hpseiespt _ ' s'a u on aat dd t M O e h ss ot aa c oeot eh qt uh o o emss aa n lat ross o h C DaIsssHHreDthDIsesDcHHaIsFaDcH I I r I _ M E
- 0. 4. 5 C T I 1
- 23. 4. 5 6
- 7. 8. 9. 1 1 1 23 1 1 1 1 6
1
E _ C N E _ R _ E F E R Y Y Y-X X X- _ S _ A D- _
/
N E
~
C O _ N E D S O O E N C Y G R O A M G e N T E N n e, h T N E ? , o c t _ T T S s n o i r u n r o E N Y O D n it t ip o i e E E S I T A io p r c e s d e h 7d n E t a n s s r n d t r e H N / P e ia? e r a v d e M L l u s e a c u o i S O I R M c d l c f f o he de? E de b c n n A P T C E l c a ,n e r, t s r teief e p i o st M T o aisv n s T i S S e S rob ei t l a S e t c lot A w lea _ O Y E Y m e bam t e r s v h e n u aro a D C S D mtn u y se c b S ue n t f s h e t s y np s y nmg t e ih f nt T oro a t e m t e _ n gut e a on sio le e f nc i act t b t s a ion _ d t on m acnt s a y s t i W E e s u t nd e er n t o s af e uc ic lp t s d n i t s n o pne E n oh eo d hef f p o r a I V T t a pom t p t e t
,h a a p p
n eop r a nt o u m T U h mr o ee on y _ E t ooc u n s u it a l _ N R B d e c se l a v?n cs dr iui s n a d c iao f c E I e e tnt h e o iap ns a t e e i f t ce N E R c e r i s eh 2 heh oa n at ox x ri i u s O T T e t hmc t e m q a o T r r t o T U T r o ce a t dc o gdl e e l c cf I N R P T B A t r ai u m el r us ne a c n r r t c es S M E t e mqs t idwi m a e e h no U I e s eer ci o vre h r t i O E R mrl o m r V t _ m eRu o o et E H T pfolorpt h r o c av c ur S C e r ugd ns f f y e _ N P S T v dine? endn nd r e n a h ht s A et co eraoo cn r ibt eo iq ee iega l O L a p t sn? A r r T V A T T v e pt at d i ub
.n t
n o e v eis lvet S A C N h r p p yt n n eck e r? e a acn v nam e L C I A t r gO nenc c neort s e c i n o t aesh L I N D E o inl a ugu aemol pari iee? s, l o p? wcL aP deer ne A N f t m ot s n gf E? tan iu rean e cmtnav ud c el t _ I V r r r O _ M H C pM m dooer las e nieMtt on neari q e C P e o e r cmt v o sr e eehmoiehno epmr eoe eh ena _ h r l E M o u g pi,rdt r ecmt o r ea _ t _ ' M O s e o hdh ht iv cis t t oeo r a n ab a o oqau svt nt os r t n s si eespihu n e em at n y o o oo a C D DVDoHeI uHcDreHsDcDDm f t C I 8 1 9 1 0 2 1. 2 2. 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 8 22
Y Y Y-X . X
- X-
_ S D-E M E O D N O C
.G M R O A E G N T T N T T S N E - E N Y O D E E S I
T A E H N I P L S O M I P E R M A M T C E T T S S S A O Y E Y e D t D C S S a D A T A D T T N N E E N 2 N O T O P I N R P T M S M E O U E E V O H C S C L N S O P L A A T V A T T ) S A C A N ( s ) s L C I N E e i t L I D M oN c n n e I A E e e r n r M H L t e m' t o C u f e o a E P b R C n p-M P tr U A i t a b iG ir O S 1 D
MILIETONE UNIT 2
~
SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CEECKLIS'IS AND WORKBOOK g PROJBCTI WWifrWt: _m JOB NOJWBS NO.:
SUBJECT:
ommees DISCFLBE: CLASSIFICATION: PmoJacts PAGE 2 0F APPUCABLE DEstGN BRUT seru masassarys p0R NUCLEAR PROJECTS: (Y)
/ (N) (if Yes, complete egdenskm, halueno refemnoes, on DIR, Form EP1-3. Note: llems 1,2 and 3 are arthN=)
(1) Scopeessic functions of structum, ayatum or componard
/
(2) Perfumance requhments, input servloes (air, elocktolty) es weg as outputs (capacity, rebng)
/ (3) codes atendants, and reguistory requhments inclueng =prhwa leeue anwar addende D <D (4) Design Condkons such as temperature, pressure, Auld, chemisky and womage D- 0 (s) Leeds such as seismic, whd, thermai and dynamic O ,
D (6) Environmental condmons mecipated, such as pressure, temperehse, humidity, corroesvenees, see elevamon, e m numiner reenman, assonomagnetic ressman, and dursson of esposum inclueng 10CFR50Ag spr am D D (7) Interssos requiremeres and consruotataty inclueno deAnNon of the funollonel and physicalinterfaces inclueng stru ayatoms, and components D D (e) Menenes requirements such noms as compeauty, sientriosi ineuhman pmporties, proteauve oceans, and corrosion resi D D (g) Mechanical requbements such as vensson, strees, shook wxt renomon somes D D (10) swuotural requirements covering such tems as equW Nndemons and pipe supports D D (11) Hydrauno mquiremeras such as NPSH, agonalde preneure drops, and fluid veloodlies D D (12) chemmmy requiremeres such as provisions for sampano and nmtemans on water chemistry ' D D (13) Electrieel requiremeras such as soume of power, votage, reneway requiremords, eisotriosi insutomon, motor require inesvatage stumes and EDG ioneng D D (14) Layoutandanungsmereresubements D D (15) Operemonal requbements under various condsons such as plant slut-,, namel plant operemon, plant shundsen, plert emergener openson, specimi or innequent opersson, and system abnormal or emergency operamon D D l (16) inskumeresson and contml requhemente inclueng indoesne instruments, conends and sierms required for operem and mentenance. D D (17) Acosas and administethe conimi requbements requimd for plant enourity D D (18) - -_ _y, everalty, and sepersson requpements D D (ig) Fanure enesis requhemeres halueng of those ments which they must wthetend D D (20) Test requkements inclueno pre operamonal and aunesquent penoec in9 tant and the coramion under which they must D D (21) Acosenesty, maintenance, repair and ineandoe hopection requirements D .D (22) Penannerequkementsandammamans a D (23) Transponstety requhments such as eine and stepping weight D D (24) Fire preteamon or fire resistance requirements D D (25) Hondung, etwage, cleaning and ehlpping requkements l D D (28) Other requirements to prevent undue risk to the hosAh and enfaty of pubec D D (27) Meandais, pmossess, pens, and equipment sunstes for appuommon a D (as) sessayrequiremeresforpovenenepersonnelinfury D D (ag) ouesty and quemy assurance requkemeres D D 90) Rossbety requhments inotuung their interactions, which may impair essely ' D D P1) Interemos equhments between pient equipment and openman and maintenanos personnel D D (32) Requirements for orginesty ooremi and ecocunishay of spoolei nuclear meterials D D (3s) apanisiALARAcanalderemons D D pe) spanisihumanfestasconsidersmans D D (35) High Energy Line Breaks em snacted D D (38) Floosne i D D A7) neesses D D 98) 10CFR50 App R, including Sete shutdown Analysis D D pg) seismiccategwysioveri . D D (e) specisiHvAcrequhments D D (41) season amohout Annoyens O D (42) Post Aooidset Mannering Requhments D D (43) OTHER requirements, as nooseawy 7teB B A DESIGN HECORD Form EP1212/96 l
- r.res.e reime creep Inc. -
PI- 79 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 l
l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRP.~._OJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECELIS*IS AND WORKBOOK l l l T1-CL-I-04 . SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 4 o d l Sinnature Data Prepared: /-M- 97 Reviewed: c49b@ Approved: c./NT 4 -SO-S[ Approved: Am, 7#d FN nermymeannecer
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 80 Revision 4 FI41. DOC June 26,1998
lWirHTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-e1 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKIJSTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 4 - SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTION CHECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this formis to: l 1
- Provide review of the NNECo Correction Actions Program (CAP) identified in Adverse Condition Reports (ACR), Condition Reports (CR) and Unresolved Items Reports (UIR).
- Document the results to assure that the CAP adequately addresses the items requiring corrective action in the Parsons Access Database, an electronic l
Form 4, Part C.
- Summarize the results of the review of corrective actions in Part B of
~
Form 4. 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number and NNECo system code
~
to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE. Each corrective action requires a separate checklist Form 4, Part C. 1.2.1 Each corrective action item checklist Form 4, Part C will be identified as follows: l RC-CA-XXXX (system designator)-nn (Tier Number)- nnnn (unique checklist form number from the record number in the database). l 1.3 The LE will review the corrective action description and assign each corrective action requiring Form 4, Part C completion to an OE . The OE enters their l name in Part C for each specific checklist they are assigned to. l 1.4 Checklist Reafirement (Part C) 1 1.4.1 Each Corrective Action =%+M with a selected system will be placed on a separate checklist (Part C) form. 1 ! 1.4.2 Using the NNECo CAP and other inputs documents as applicable, the OE l completes the electronic Part C of the form. 1.4.3 If tlie requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is l responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided. 1.4.4 The CAP checklist requirement. result should be described in sufficient detail. The OS will determine the depth of the review. 1.4.5 The OE of the Form 4, Part C ensures all questions are completed and l diweies are formally identified. Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the OE provides a disposition, prints the electronic copy of the completed form signs and dates the checklist. The signature indicates that the
- - Pmons Power Group Inc. -
l PI- 81 Revision 4 PI41. DOC /une 26,19M L
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIEN PI-41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK Q'!h review of the individual corrective action is complete. If a Technical Specialist review was required, their signature and date is also entered. l 1.4.6 The completed Form 4, Part C is then reviewed by the LE or their designee. l When determined acceptable the signature and date are entered. 1.4.7 Upon completion ofForm 4, Part C for a system, the LE signs and dates the appropriate Revision block in Part A. l.5 An expert panel comprised of System Leads and Technical Leads provides an integrated oversight review of completed Form 4, Part C checklists for each system. The OE or LE make a presentation on each checklist and resolves i questions. Documentation of approval is indicated in a Form 4, Part A checklist with the list of approved Form 4, Part C checklists aMacM 2.0 CHECKLIST QUESTIONS
- l 2.1 The attached Form 4, Part C checklist provides the question to be answered for each Corrective Action.
p 2.2 These questions are based on the NRC Order and have been app.oved for use by d the NRC. l l l l l 1 1 0
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-82 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 N--_______________________
1 I l l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 Document ID RC-CA- Page Lgf.3 ICAVP SVSR System Code SYSTEM CORRECTIVE System: ACTION Cap Number: CHECKLIST CAP
Title:
Responsible Engineer: PART A CORRECTIVE ACTION CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 mamaamm sieme n e m me mm/om L ORIGINATOR .
- 2. REVIEWED - - -
Machenir*114ad 9~*ical Lead Control SystemsImad ; Pipmg/StructuralLead l Operations Fnpnm Fi n s6Fnpne Testing Fnpneer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
Systemlead Fnpnm l SVSRLead Fnpnm PART B SYSTEM CORRECTIVE ACTIONS PROGRAM OBSERVATIONS & FIhTINGS
SUMMARY
Instructions: (1) De SLE will review the attached checklist and suppleaneetal material for corrective action documents l that the ICAVP found discrepeat. (2) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement items amanber(s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP47. l REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2
- 1. Is the corrective action l satisfactorily 0 Yes D No D Yes D No D Yes O No l incorporated or will be incorporated into the systeem desiga?
- 2. Samusaryof Discrepancy (les) Items l
l Signature SLE/Date , - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 4 I I.44 - 1 Package Sequence No. 5 Revision 4 F4,,,CIIB. DOC 6/26/98
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 Document ID RC-CA- P ge2 gf.f ICAVP SVSR system Code d SYSTEM CORRECTIVE System: ACTION Cap Number: CHECKLIST CAP
Title:
l Responsible Engineer: i PART C Document Type: Number: Responsible Panons Discipline:
- 1. Does the cornetive action, including namacia**4 AR's, apply to the system under review? l
- 2. Was the deficiency properiy identified inchding extent of condition? l
- 3. Should a root cause analysis have been done? l
- 4. Was the root cause analysis done?
- 5. Was the root cause deternalnation adequate?
- 6. Did the pmposed resolution address the root cause? l l
1
- 7. Should a determination have been made of failure modes or the mechanism of equipment failure? l l
l
- 8. Was the pmposed resolution clear 1y defined? l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 4 ! I-84 -2 Package Sequence No. 5 Revision 4 F4_,CIIB. DOC 6/26/98
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 Document ID RC-CA- Page 3 of 4 ICAVP SVSR System Code SYSTEM CORRECTIVE System: ACTION Cap Number: CHECKLIST CAP
Title:
] l Responsible Engineer: PART C
- 9. Was the proposed resolution technically adequate? l l 10. Does the cornettve action, as proposed or implemented, comply with the licensing basis? l l 11. Does the moolution, as proposed or implemented, comply with the design basis?
l
- 12. Does the resolution identify configuration control ele =*=ts for update? l O 13. Has the implementation of the corrective action been conopleted? l
- 14. Should the proposed cornetive actions, including configuration control *3*=*=ts, be completed before startup? l l
l Referenced ARs for Question 14 l 1 l Parsons Originating Engineer: Reference Dar=ments: l l
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
1 FORM: 4 I44-3 Package Sequence No. 5 I Revision 4 j F4_CLCB. DOC 6/26/98 1 1
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 Doca-nt ID RC-CA- Page 4 of 4 , ICAVP SVSR system Code SYSTEM CORRECTIVE System: ACTION Cap Number: CHECKLIST CAP
Title:
Responsible Engineer: _-g .. ........m. . , . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . _ _ _ . _ . . . _ . . - _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . PART C Corrective Action is considered as: SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS . l DECREPANCY: O (r=== perPeg O (Pmbedy dhcovered by NNECo, summarke hash and UIR , CR or discovery decomment below). O (megidre==m's men smay - het d e mee as=< w - __ d. cam.meme , d ism hans. .r n. y
..- sem-arme hel w).
O Pmedent= . . ' - O '". estenter m b w. O ' ' --- - a e caen em p r m.se com= met done nei resdr=d. O ramen to id. mary comer.a.d - m, sec., regddas ordase-O Insproper MODE cme er W Imel ===l:=====d O resan to haplasmaat as ideadSed e.rreceive aceem that h a non-amisty nimaed enhammment and the I ACR/CR er UIR h sensed. l Originating Engineer Signature /Date i I Lead Engineer l Signature /Date Interface ReviewerInput Signatun/Date Signaturr/Date Signatun/Date Signaturr /Date l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 4 I44-4 Package Sequence No. 5 Revision 4 F4_CLCB. DOC 6/26/98
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMEN1ATION CHECKLISTS AhD WORKBOOK O T1-CL-I-05 . SYSTEM MODIFICATION
SUMMARY
SCREENING INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 5 O Signature Dat.c Prepared: 4 21-9 Reviewed: .I- Mb@ l Approved: ( //# T d 97 l 4 proved: 1M MProjeDumtw SoJ W f8 O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 83 Revision 4 PI 01. DOC June 26,1998 I L-_-----------
I MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTI!N PI41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O
~
==
Form 5 will not be required to be completed effective 1/19/98. All modifications identified for the selected systems for which an initial screening has not been completed will be reviewed utilizmg the Form 7 process. For those modifications for which a Form 5 has been done it will be noted in Form 6 that the Form 5 screenmg has been completed. The basis for the change is that the Form 5 screening process completed for the first system to complete the review process did not result in a significant reduction in modifications requirmg full review as initially envisioned. This change will not result in any substantive change in that the questions utihzed in the screening process are essentially the same as those utilized in the Form 7 reviews. 1.0 FORM 5 - SYSTEM MODIFICATION
SUMMARY
SCREENING 1.1 The purpose of this form is to identify minor system modifications from the detailed review process that do not affect the licensing bases 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, NNECo mod number, NNECo mod title, and w/ indicates the responsible SLE. Each modification that is screened requires a separate form and Document ID number. 4 1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate revision blockin Part A. 1.3.1 The SLE will provide the OE a listing of all modifications that are applicable to the selected system. 1.3.2 The OE uses this list to perform the Modification Screening Process. Note: All applicable system modifications must be screened, including canceled and in process modifications. 1.4 Using the Modification and description listing provided by NNECo, the OE answers the question in Part B of the Modification Screening Form following any additional instruction included in Part B. 1.4.1 If the responses to any question is "Yes," continue and complete Part C of the form. ! 1.4.2 If the responses to all questions are "No," the modification is considered minor l and the reviewis complete.
- Parsons Power Group lac. -
l PI- 84 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998 l
MITJRT3NE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O
~
1.4.3 The OE provides a disposition in Part C, signs and dates the form and proceeds in accordance with the General Review and Approval Instmetion in Section 6.0 of this document. 1.5 Tne OE submits the form and checklist to the interface reviewers in accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document. 1.6 Each Modification screening associated with the selected system will be placed . on a separate form. I - l l l O U l l l l l 3 I l O sj l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
l PI- 85 Revision 4 PM1. DOC June 26,1998 i
DOCUMENTID: SMSS- Page.Lgfl MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM MODIFICATION mon Number SCREENING
SUMMARY
mon utie Responsible Fnpnme-(System Teamlead) PART A SYSTEM MODIFICATION SCREENING
SUMMARY
INTERFACE SIGN OFF REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 me-a =e* se se
- 1. ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - - -
)Amchanwal Lead Electncal Lead Control Systeunslead Piping / Structural 14ad Operatacus Fnpnaar Procedures Fnpner Testing Engmeer
- 3. APPROVAL - -
Systaan lead Fnpnner SVSR14ad Eagmeer PART B MINORMODIFICATION SCREENING
Purpose:
IMs purpose of this screes is to identify those systeam anodifications that are evaluated as adaer or not significant to the design process. Instructions: 1. Review the snodification and prwide response to the following questions. 'Ihe anodification package is rwiewed to the level necessary to determine the applicabuity of the scrosalag questies.
- 2. If the answer to any Part B rogs;rement is "Yes", Comiplete Part C Check " Review Modification la Accordance with Modificaties Checklist", saammarise sa Forsa 6, sign and date. Pad C.
- 3. If the answer to aH Part B requirements are "No", the Modification does met constitute a potential impact en plaat cesfigarsties as a function oflie==else or design basis. Consplete Part C Check" Minor Modification", sign and date Part C.
- 4. If the smedificaties was canceled, consplete Part C, s====dse on Fona 6, sign and date Part C. Note the rwiew of the cancaisd anodificaties will be perforuned using Form 7.
SCREENING BASIS- I Questica A> placability '
- l. O Yes D No Is there insufficient detdl in the modification package to adequately respond to the followmg Part B questions? (If"YES,"no %rther sweemng is required. Complete part C).
- 2. D Yes O No Was the modification mM7 (If"YES", no further screemog is required. Complete part C).
- 3. O Yes D No Does the modification involve active safety related or seismic class 19- ,==?
- 4. D Yes O No Would the modification require changes to the Technical Specification *** manta contamed in Form 27
- 5. D Yes D No Will the modification change the function of the system?
- 6. D Yes O No Will the modification require changes to plant any operstmg procedures?
4
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 5 I.05 - 1 Package Sequence No. 6 Revision 2 F5,,8CRNB 9/23/97
DOCUMENTID: SMSS- Page J.gfl , MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O 1Cive SvSa SvSrEMI SYSTEM MODIFICATION wonNumber SCREENING
SUMMARY
mon no. Responsible Fntan=' (System TeamImd)
- 7. O Yes O No Did the M Ardon reqmre the issue or revision of procuresnent or installation specifications?
- 8. O Yes O No Does the Utility review of the modification indicate a FSAR change is reqmred?
- 9. O Yes O No Has a 10CFR50.59 cvaluation been performed by the Utility?
- 10. O Yes O No Could the mo&fication impact any of the 19 ii ep :ic issues listed in item B.2 of Form 3?
- 11. O Yes O No. Does the modification impact any interface with other systems?
PART C SYSTEM MODIFICATION SCREENING DISPOSITION i A. CONCLUSIONS O MINOR MODIFICATION - NO FURTHER REVIEW OF MODIFICATION REQUIRED D REVIEW MODIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH MODIFICATION CHECK LIST O MODIFICATION CANCELED Originating Engineer: Date: B. OBSERVATIONS /COletENTS (If Applicable): i i-l 4 I O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 5 I 2 Package Sequence No. 6 Revision 2 F55CRNB 9/23/97
l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 l SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 l SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1 i T1-CL-I-06 . SYSTEM MODIFICATION I
SUMMARY
LISTING l INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 6 ; I O l \ l Sinnature g Prepared: e 449.Sp Reviewed: Akg Approved: c /#7- 6 o-pg Approved: A 7a J VA)f$
- DeputyProject Drector I
l0
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-86 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MILYSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 6 - SYSTEM MODIFICATION
SUMMARY
L15 TING 1.1 The purpose of this form is to summarize and document the modifications that , will be reviewed for the selected system, i 1.2 The SLE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE. l 1.3 Since the purpose of the this form is to document the applicable modifications I that will be reviewed, the individual who originates the Modification Screening l Form will fill in the appropriate sections based upon the results of the screening. i O l 1 0
- Parsons Power Group 1mc. -
PI-87 Revision 4 PM1. DOC June 26,1998
DOCUMENTID: SMSL- Page 1 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O . icAveSvSa SYSTEM MODIFICATION svSTEM:
SUMMARY
LISTING Responsible Fntnneer (System Teamlead) Itag NNECo Modification Title of Modification Number 1.
- 2. -
ModificationInProcess O 1. Modification Canceled 1. I l l l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
l - FORM: 6 j I 1 Package Sequence No. 7 , Redsion 2 ' F6 MODLDOC 9/23/97 {
- _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ b
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK r T1-CL-I-07 . SYSTEM MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS - FORM 7 O Sinnature p_att Prepared: .6# g,a,9p Reviewed: e49 @ Approved: / / 77 7 4, 9f Approved: SOJuNf9
%.a one, O
- Parsonas Power Gmup Inc. -
I%1. DOC ya ,199g
IwyruTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCHON FI-41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WOREBOOK 1.0 FORM 7 - SYSTEM MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this formis to:
- Provide review of the NNECo Modification Design Process, e Evaluate the modification to ensure that configuration management has been considered; and e Document the results of the modification review.
1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Daa-at ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, NNECo mod number, NNECO mod title and indicates the responsible SLE. Each modification that is reviewed requires a separate fonn and Dea-at ID number. 1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision blockinPart A. 1.4 The SLE in concert with the LE will review the specific nWkliet requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) reviewer, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Part E, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer /mspector's name to each specific eWkli=t requirement. 1.5 Modification Package Initial Configuration Control Review Using the modification descriptions and modification packages, the OE answers the questions in Part C following any additional instruction included in Part C. 1.5.1 If the response to any question is "Yes," the moddication will be reviewed in l detail. The OE dispositions the screening for additional review, signs and dates Part C of the form and continues with Parts D and E. 1.5.2 If the response to all questions is "No," the OE completes Item C.1, signs and l dates the form and does not do any additional review of the modification. 1.6 Modification ProgranWopical Area Review (Part D) The intent of this step is to review a modification with respect to program / topical areas to a level that demonstrates that NNECo meets the configuration innagement control aspects of the modification. A review of the program / topical area for conformance to the selected system current licensing basis will be reviewed during the System Design Input, Licensing Bases and Progran#opical review. o - Parsons Power Group inc. - i M - 89 Rension 4 l l M-01. DOC June 26.1998
ust.r RTONE UNTF 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCT13N FI41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS15 AND WORKBOOK 1.6.1 The OE reviews the modification package and completes Part D of the l program / topical area modification checklists following any additional instruction in Part D. This purpose of this step is to document whether NNECo %s considered the program / topical area. 1.6.2 The OE screens the modification for applicatnhty to each of the program / topical l areas in accordan::e with Part D.1(2) and determines the applicabihty following l the instructions. 1.6.3 The OE and review specialist disposition the program / topical area in Part D, l Item 1, signs and date the forin. This signature indicates that the in== tion of this step is complete. - 1.6.4 The OE/ review specialist summarizes any programs that were not properly considered and indicates the program and discrepancy number in Part D, Item 2. Any additional com==**/ observations, if required, are domm=*M in Part D, Item 3. 1.7 Checklist Requimnent (Part E) 1.7.1 Using the NNECo Modification Package and other inputs documents as applicable, the OE(s) completes Part E of the Modification Checklist following O any additional instruction included in Part E. 1.7.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requiremerit input is provided. 1.7.3 The Modification checklist requimnent result should be described in sufficient detail The OF/mspector determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used onlyifrequired. 1.7.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned ia== tor checks the appropriate blocks under item B, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part E, signs and dates the specific regtdiw rfs). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete. Note: Modifications that have interface with procedures or testing require Part E to be completed. Any interface indicated in Part E will be reviewed in l accordance with the requirements of the Procedures and Testing checklists (Forms 8 or 9). 1.8 The OE of the form assures all the reviewer /ia== 'or inputs are included for each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) reviewer l . O 1
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
Pt.90 Revision 4 ) PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK signature, and (3) date. The OE counts the number ofpages and adds the appropriate total in the header box of the form. 1.9 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Parts C, D, and E that are dispositioned as a
" Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B by providing a summary disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the . form.
1.10 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in - accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval. 1.11 Each Modification listed on the Modification Summary Listing (Form 6) will be placed on a separate form for review. Note: For canceled modifications only applicable questions need to be answered. 2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used to generate the specific O checklist questions to be incorporated onto the form. These questions and requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Oveniew Plans, and SSFI/IDI procedures. 2.2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review requirements for the selected _ system. 2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook. O
- Parsons Power Gnsp Inc. -
PI-91 Revision 4 PI 01. DOC June 26,1998
l IwrrHTONE UNIT 2 oVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIUN PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK SYSTEM MODIFICATION l CHECKLIST l INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Modifications which are selected for further review by the screening process are reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 7. The modifications selected for review are listed on Form 6.
Form 6 also contains a list of allin process and canceled modifications for the system.
- 2. The System Lead hgiw shall revise the following questions as required to prepare the specific review questions to be utilized by the iWon team. l
- 3. The SLE reviews the following questions, revising, myending or deleting them as l requimd, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: these questions are customized for each selected system and do not require l the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system.
- 4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist questions contained in the licensing l basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendix A.
A. GENERAL e Does the modification accomplish it's stated purpose? e If the modification changed either the licensing or design bases, was the ! as-modified design / licensing basis correctly revised as part of the modification process? e If the modification has the potential to change the licensing basis was the potential change adequately addressed in the safety evaluation to assure that the modification did not create an unreviewed safety question? e Has the modification, if adding non-safety equipment or modifications to structures, considered seismic class 2-over-1 concerns? l0
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI- 92 Revudon 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILIATONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION C.1IECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e Are the on=>h+ive effects of the modi 6 cation on support systems, such as Cooling Water, HVAC, Electrical Power Supply, etc. addressed and reviewed as part of the modi 6 cation process? e Are there dommaa*M Interface Reviews by other groups such as Operations, l Training, Simulator Training, Testing, and Maintenance? e Are the non-safety portions of the modi 6 cation isolated by devices / methods n ' g single failure criteria, or are calculations available demonstrating that a failure in the non-safety branch will not prevent the system from performing its safety function?
. Are the con 6guration control documents (ONE LINES, ELEMENTARIES, LOGICS, AND P&ID'S) that would require revision as a resuh of the modification updated to re6ect the moddications?
e For new or revised calculations that were performed for the modification, did the calculations use recognized analytical methods and the designm' put correctly? e For new or revised calculations that were performed for the moddication, are all assumptions tehaic=Hy sound?
. If the modification makes a change that affects a performance parameter, was post-modification testing identi6ed?
e If the modification has the potential to change the design margins for a system, have the design margins been addressed? e If the modi 6 cation contains any " temporary" changes, were these changes analyzed and controlled?
. If a proposed modification was canceled,' did it result in procedural changes that could impose an excessive burden on the plant operators during normal or emergency operating conditions?
e Was a canceled moddication partially implama M and not documented Pf0Pedy? e Were field changes, if performed during the implementation of the modi 6 cation, reviewed and incorporated into the "as built" documentation?
. . Has the impact of the moddication on the original design analysis, applicable to the unmodified portions of the system been addressed?
O !
- Persees Power Group loc. -
l M- 93 Revision 4 I M 01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCITON PI-4I SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK e If the modification added or revised a component that effects a setpoint alarm, calibration or operation (logic and/or sequence) have the appropriate procedures interfaces been identified?
. If the modification added or revised a component that effects operation, function, surveillance, performance, or timing characteristics have appropriate testing procedures interfaces been identified?
e If the modification added or revised a component that effects operation, logic, control board, or maintenance has the training interface been considered in the modification?
\
O O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 94 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page L2ff 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW M DNumber CHECKLIST MOD Me Responsible Fnpneer-PART A MODIFICATION CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION O REVISION 1 REVISION 2 sanan.om somm/om se==.c.m
- 1. ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - -
Merhanieml Lead Electricallead Control Systems Lead Pipmg/StructuralLead Operations Fnpneer Tydmo Fnpneer Testing Fnpneer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
System lead Fnpneer SYSRImad Fnpneer PART B MODIFICATION
SUMMARY
j i Instructions: (1) The SLE will review the attached checklist and supplemental amaterial and indicate whether the modification adequately considend or incorporated the indicated requirements. (2) ne SLE will review Part D and any suppleasental masterial and indicate whether the anodification l sdequately considered the indicated pngram/ topical requireanents. De detailed review of the programa/ topical areas will be reviewed as a part of the SYSTEM Review. i (3) For each DISCREPANCY found during the review, the SLE is to indicate the requiressent item l l number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per FF-07. REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2
- 1. Has the anodification satisfied the licensing O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No basis and configuration contred?
- 2. Are the applicable program / topical areas O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No adequately considered in the modification?
- 3. Summaryof Discrepancy (les) Items (Part D, E) l Signature SLE/Date
(
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I-07-1 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Page 2 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O ICivr svsa svsrEu: N Number MODIFICATION REVIEW . CHECKLIST " "* Responsible Engmeer. (System TeamI.ead) PART C MODIFICATION SCREENING
Purpose:
This purpose of this screening is to identify those system modifications that are determined to be minor or not significant to the design process. Instructions: 1. Review the modification and provide response to the following questions. The modification package is reviewed to the level necessary to determine the applicability of the screening question.
- 2. If the answer to my Part C requirennent is "Yes", Coenplete Part C Check " Review Modification in Accordance with Modification Checklist", summarize on Form 6, sign and date Part C.
- 3. If the answer to allPart C requirements are "No", the Modification does not constitute a potentialimpact on plant configuration as a function oflicensing or design basis. Complete Part C1 Check " Minor Modification", sign and date Part CL
- 4. If the modification was canceled, consplete Part C1, sununarise on Form 6, sign and date Part C1 (and answer questions E.14 and F.15).
SCREENING BASIS. Question Applicability
- 1. O Yes O No Was the Wi&m6on canceled? .(If"YES", no further scuenmg is rega: red. Complete part C.1).
- 2. O Yes O No Does the modification involve safety related or seismic class 1 vts?
- 3. O Yes O No Does the mochficanon requae changes to the Technical Specificabons?
- 4. O Yes O No Does the modification change the function of the system?
- 5. O Yes O No Does the Wi6 cation require changes to any plant procedures?
- 6. O Yes O No Does the modification indnte a FSAR change is requued?
)
- 7. O Yes O No Doce the modification involve changes that require review per 10CFR50.59 7
)
- 8. O Yes O No Could the modification impact any of the pa p--- =6c issues hstedin part D7
- 9. O Yes O No Does the Wi6 cation change support system iq6msnts (e.g. motor HP, HVAC, etc.)? l PART C.1 SYSTEM MODIFICATION SCREENING DISPOSITION j A. CONCLUSIONS l
0 MINOR MODIFICATION - NO FURTHER REVIEW OF MODIFICATION REQUIRED 0 REVIEW MODIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARTS D AND E O MODIFICATION CANCELED (Coenplete E.14 and E.15) Odginating Engineer: Date: B. OBSERVATIONS / COMMENTS (If Applicable): 1 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I 2 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7.CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98 L__ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Pege 3 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW M DNumber CHECKLIST M D Me Respcmasible Fntnneer (System Team Lead) PART D SYSTEM MODIFICATION PROGRAM /I'OPICAL CHECKLIST General Instructions: (1) The intent of this Part of the checklist is to indicate which program / topical areas, that were in effect at the time of the modification, were considered by NNECo as part of the modifi. Na process. G) From a Configuration Management viewpoint, each modification should be reviewed against each of the NNECo program / topical areas implementation dates for applicability. In reality, only certain areas may apply to the modification. Q) For each program / topical area listed below, the system ORIGINATIhU ENGINEER (OE) determines if the applicable area applies to the modification and indicates applicability in the appropriate box in Column E. Where applicable, the OE may request input from program specialists. (4) The OE signs and dates to indicate that Part D is completed. I PART D.1 PROGRAM /I'OPICAL AREA MODIFICATION CHECKLIST Instructions: (1) The OE reviews the modification package and indicates whether the program / topical area was in effect at the time of the modification. If the program / topical area was in effect at the time of the modification check"yes" in column A. If the program /topicsl area was not in effect at the time of the modification check"no" in column A. If the response is 'no" no further action is required for the program / topical area. If the response is "yes" continue on to item 2 below. G) Upon review of the modif5 cation package the OE is to detennine whether NNECo considered the program as part of the modification. Ibe program / topical area consideration by NNEco must be noted in the modificatke package. . If the asodification package indicates consideration by NNEra check "yes" under coleman D. If the OE is unable to determine if NNECo considered the prsgram/topiul area check "no" under column D. Q) The OE is to independently determine applicability of each program / topical area in effect at the time of the modification and indicate its applicability in column E. If the OE's response is different than that determined by NNECo check the Discrepancy block for the program / topical area in column E and process the discrepancy.
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 1 07 - 3 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CIRDE. DOC 2/26/98
I DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page4.gfjf MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SYSR SYSTEM: 4 MODIFICATION REVIEW " " """6"
)
CHECKLIST "'""* Responsible Engmeer (System TeamImad) PREMISE RESULTS Program Did NNECo OE Evaluation laeffect PROGRAM /TOPICALAREA consider ofthe
.' elan prior to Pingram/ Program /
Date Med Topical Aren? Topical Ana: A B D E 1248 0 Yes Does the morhficarian. add, delete or modify the 1= ant O Yes O Applicable O No basis for the MW Trannents Without SCRAM O No O Discrepancy (A1WS)? 245 0 Yes Does the madificahan involve changes to the main control O Yes O Apphcah'e O No board, local panels, tah*1mf or the operatag procedures O No O Di~ w y requiring a Numan Factors Review? (CRDR) 1145 O Yes Does the madificahan add or change ---w-- "= requirmg O Yes O Applicable O No evaluation under the beenseg basis for envirann=ntal O No O Discrepancy mielikmeinn? (" 12-91 O Yes Does the inadific=han affect portions of a system covered by 0 Yes O Apphcable Q} 12 75 O No O Yes the erosion / corrosion program for the plant? Does the madibation affect +, , - ^ doors, hatcham, O No O Yes O Diu wy O Appbcable O No buildmg structure or other features require to protect the O No O Discrepancy system from external =i==les, tornadaas., floodmg or other external events included in the liaanant bases? 11-95 0 Yes Does the modification add or modify any motor operated O Yes O Apphcable O No valves reqmrmg review under the plants MOV program? O No O Disaepancy (89-10) 741 O Yes Does the modification change or add cranes / loads requirms O Yes O Apphcable O No evaluation under the heavy loads program? O No O Discapancy 12 75 0 Yes Does the madificahan involve high or moderate energy 0 Yes O Applic hie l O No piping that regares evaluation for it's affect on safe O No O Discrepancy shnidawn , in accordance with the 1manemg basis? 12-75 O Yes Does the modific=han change or add components that are O Yes O Applicable O No covered by the plants inservice inspection program? O No O Discrepancy 5-79 O Yes Does the madific=han change or add -----i- - r that are O Yes O Applicable O No covered by the plant inservice testag program? (ASME O No O Di-wy Section XIor Appendix J)
.12-95 O Yes Does the =adificahan affect equipmeet, doors, hatch =, O Yes O Applicahla O No building structures or other featwes covered in the plant O No O Discrepancy Individual Plant Fremmahan for External Events? (IPEEE) l l
l - Parsons Power Genup Inc. - FORM.7 I47-4 Package Sequence New 8 Revislea 4 F7-CIJgDE. DOC 2/26/98 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
l l DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Pageigfjf MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE:
, ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM:
MODIFICATION REVIEW " N""6 CHECKLIST " "' Resptsible Fngmnes-(System T*mn IAnd) 1-as O Yes Will se endi&ean require revisions to the Master O Yes O Apphcable O No Equipment and Parts List?(MEPL) O No O DLwi 2-84 O Yes Does the modification affect ia.im required le O Yes O Applicable O No heensmg basis compliance with Regulatory Guide 15n O No O Discrepancy 12-75 0 Yes Does the modification involve changes which could affect 6e O Yes O Apphcable O No licensmg basis for separation, hW. or diversity? O No O Discrepancy 12 75 O Yes Does the ma,h&= son impact en instrument or device O Yes O Apphceble O No setpomt? O No O Discrepancy 12-75 O Yes Does the modi & mon stroduce any single failure O Yes O Apphcable O No vah =hGties into the plant or change features provided for O No O Ducrepancy single failure protectaan? 4-89 0 Yes Does the madincation affect any c- ,
-s or systems used O Yes O Applicable i O No for copmg with Station Blackout? O No O Discrepancy 4-88 0 Yes Does the modification involve - ; =^= required for O Yes O Applicable O No Appendix R safe shutdowr., Gre suppre ,sions sptesns, fire O No O D6#-i detection systems, f:re bemers, eu..?
l-92 O Yes Does the modification affect the seismic A-46 analysis of the O Yes O Applicable O No system or the <==WA of the c-----" in the system? O No O D6, .y
- 1. PROGRAM / TOPICAL
SUMMARY
l The above p.,.-- ",'-2 areas have been reviewed and applicability noted. 'Ibe program / topical areas with respect to this usodification: l O ADEQUATELY ADDRESS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ASPECTS I O DOES NOT SATISFY CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ASPECT 3 (List program (s) and discrepancy number (s) below and vedfy that a discrepancy is prar+==d la accordance with PP-07) ProgramrTopical Speciahst/Date Origmatmg Engmeering/Date:
- 2. PROGRAM / TOPICAL AREA (S) NOT CONFORMING TO CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT Item Progransfropical Discrepancy Number
- 3. COMMEN*t3/ OBSERVATIONS (If applicable):
I
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I47-5 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 6 cf 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW M DNumber CHECKLIST M D Me l Responsible Fngmner-(System Teamland) PART E SYSTEM MODIFICATION REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST Instructions: For each requiressent listed below: (1) GLE, SLE, OE and systeen team develops the specific requiressents to be reviewed uslag the gemede questions la the Instruction and Attachement A source book. Eng;h requirement will be given a new iteen aussber and include steps A, B, C, and D. - (2) Each requiressent will be consecutively numbered starting with 1 (one). (3) h Systems Imad Engineer will assign the review group responsible for reviewing each requireanent. Mechanical = M, Elecedcal = E Controls = IAC, Testing = T, Procedures = P. Operations = 0 (4) h individual that reviews the requirassent will sien and date. provide a disposities, indicate interfaces, and provide a response based apen the following
- a. Yes Requiressent is satisfactory addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No apla==hIresults is required.
- b. No Requirassent is not satisfactorily addressed or discrepeat condities exists. Provide a bdef explanation of how the requiressent was not satisfied. Include reference source (s), revision, and date, as applicable. '" ;- " the condition as a DISCREPANCY and classify the basis la step B. The responsible individual shall advise the SLE of any requirennent being ; '"--- ' as a DISCREPANCY in accordance with Project Procedure PP-47. Initiation of PP-47 will be by the OE. Process and procedural discrepancies not dispositioned la accordance with PP-47 will be analysed by Tier 3.
- c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Explanation should be included only ifit cladfles the disposition.
- d. INF Requireanent could not be verifled because infor==h could not be found. If am RAI was generated to clarify the requirement, the RAI namnber and subsequent NNEco sospense reference is to be provided. In Part D ladicate the inforunaties could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. 'I1ne responsible individual shall advise the SI.E of any requirement being dispositiemed as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of PP-47 will be by the OE.
l l l l l l
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I47-6 Package Sequence No. 8 l Revision 4 l F7-CLMDEDOC 2/26/98
I DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 2,g[Jf I i MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: l l MODIFICATION REVIEW M DNusskr ) CHECKLIST M D D& Respoemble Engmeer s (Systen Team Lead) Parte Review Requirossent Items Group Status Reviewer Signature {
- 1. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date '
A. REQUIREMENT Does the anodifienda= acconsplish it's stated purpose? - l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l t O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS ' O DISCREPANCY: O er ce==perFrm) j O (rms.=sy am v=.s by NNECe, summartse beds ud UM,CR or enemry escamentin step D) ' O ataedr== a m.t smay shasa his a t ashet physicalesmagerassa h design hads er. . , ngedressemen. summenarene hans k see, D bekw). j l I C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I 7 Package sequence No. 8 i Revision 4 F7-CLMDLDOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Parp 8 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: , ,, MODIFICATION REVIEW M DNumber CHECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer (Symem TeamImd) Parte Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 2. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT If the modification changed either the licensing or design bases, was the as-modified design /hcensing basis l correctly mised as part of the modification process?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Fr.c = per Fr.07) O <rmioney aheeversa by NNECo .m umuke buts .ma UM, Ch er escovery W h St.y D) O (n.gedr==n ne k m.:sey n.e.a be 4 m.t.s.ca phyek. e.ma ser nam a ,4 is. bessor. _ . - j . __ "- % b i.h sey D b. low) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT I
I l l I
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I 8 Package Sequence No. 8 Redslon 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 2,.gflf MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MOD Number MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST M D Me Responsible Fnpnner (Systeen TeamIaad) Parte Review Requiremnemt Issen Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 3. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date A. REQUIREMENT l
If the anodiflemeiam has the potential to change the lice ==Ing basis was the potential change adequately addataned in the safety evaluation to assure that the anodification di . mi create an unreviewed safety question? B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O Crr e==perFr-o7) O (Frevbesty dheevend by NNFre, summmedse hash and UIR , CR or diseemry w h Star D). O (agedr====8 h m.e ne she.d het de a.: ashd phydemt samaswesen . design beds erreguissory. , _ % hasis to seep D hahm). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l l l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I 9 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 10 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW """""6 CHECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer (Systesn Team Lead) Parte Review Requiresnest Item Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 4. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date A. REQUIREMENT Has the anodification,if adding non-safety equipuneet or modifications tastructures, considered seismaic class l 2-over-1 concerns?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Preuse perPP-07) O (Previeudy discovered by hm summmaarke hash and UIR , CR er discovery d- ha Seep D). O (Reesdr====e k met 8mmy sessa.4 bue does n e ser.ct physicalcomagerseen h deden hemis or regubeery ; , ' Samsmarke hans ta step D heleur) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
0 - Parseas Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I 10 Package Sequence No. 8 Revislom 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98 l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 11 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW "*"""""' CHECKLIST "*""* Respoemble Engmeer (Svstem TeamIAnd) Parte Review Requinseest Items Group Status Reviewer Signature
- s. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date A. REQUIREMENT Art the r=== dative eNects of the anodipe=*ia= en support systemas, such as Cooling Water, HVAC, Electdcal Power Supply etc. addressed and reviewed as part of the anodipen*iam process? l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE IJCENSING/ DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Fr ssya Fr47)
O (Previousey ene.vered by NNECe, sum mentse ts b and UIR,CR er discovery h h Step D). O (n.,mr.- ha.:asy sms.a b.:4 .mmesperdsms asures - a.dem hash er nauheory regekumames. ammmartse bush h se.y D hat.w). I C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O I D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT 1
i O - Parsees Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I47-11 Package Segmence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
l DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 12 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW " """6 ) l CHECKLIST " "' ! Responsible Engmeer (System Team Imd) Parte Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 6. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT Are there docuamented Interface Reviews by other groups such as Operations, Training,Sinsulatar Training, Testing, and Maintenance?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperFF47) O (Frevie=str escovered by NNFCo, sumumarke hash and UIR , CR er dheevery W in seep D). O (=> .
- -km t mer smehe.d b.:d emee es.ca physicalcondeurunen h desip hadser. . , . . ^ summeertu hases hs seep D %
C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT i
l l I lO - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM.7 I47- 12 Package Sequence No. B Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 13 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW MM Neber l CHECKLIST Fe=pna.ible Engmeer (Sy.nem Team lead) Parte Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 7. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT Are the nee-eafety portions of the anodincation isolated by devices / methods aneeting single failure criteria, l or are e=Real=*la=. available d*=ma=.trating that a failure la the non-safety branch will not prevent the systems from pesfonning its safety fonction?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Ps perrr47) 0 (Pr i em r.4 byNrac.,e had. d vin,ca.,as =y a-m se.,p). O at.o.ar.m mas. a seressines hetd e es.cs phy kni asures a.am maal ,a.ds. had .r regul.a ry r.e.dramames, summ ard.e b i.k se y D h.5.w). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
1 l l O - Persons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I47- 13 Package Sequence No. 8 . Revision 4 F7-CLMDLDOC 2/26/98 l
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page Id of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: O MODIFICATION REVIEW 1Civesvsa svsTE
"""""6*'
I CHECKLIST M D Me l Responsible Engineer (Systein Team Lead) Parte Review Requirassent l Items Group Status Reviewer Signature j s. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date A. REQUIREMENT Are the coanguration control dar== (ONE LINES, ELEMENTARIES, LOGICS, and P&ID'S) that would require revision as a memit of the anod:Reation updated to renect the snodiGeations? B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pr eenperrest) O G. . . ' ,dimeevered by NNECe, ammmaartme hash and UIR , CR er discovery h im Seep D) O (= . - h ase ammr asehe.d hun de mee es.ee phyukal comagurmdes h dodge hads or ; _ , . , ^ Simmsmartse basis ha step D behm) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O 1 D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l l l i l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I 47 - 14 Package Sequence Nos 8 Redslos 4 F7-CLMDEDOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 15 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM:
" " """6
MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST " " "
- Raponnble Enguser (Systeen Team IAnd)
Parte Review Requiremnemt lesem Group Sistus Reviewer Signature
- 9. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date l A. REQUIREMENT l
For new or revised calculations that were perforsned for the z '__ =F = did the rele=Intians use recognised analytical asethods and the design input correctly? I B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (PressesperPr47) . O (rmleash disemrod by NNECe, summmerhe hemis and UIR, CR er disemry h in Step D). I O (maguer== mass b met edt ==essed h=t dass ==t as=st phystemi semesurnales h desism hesiserrussissary. , -- sh hads ha step D helow). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT I l l l 1 l l v
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I 15 Package Sequence No. 8 Revisloe 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 16 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: M DNumber MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST Responsible Fnp-(System TeamIAnd) l Parte Review Regadressent Iteam Group Status Reviewer Signature l te. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT For new or revised cale=Imelams that were perforuned for the anodification, are all mammanptions tschalcaMy somad? B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (h perFr47) O W muevned by NNECe, summmandse basis and UIR , CR er eiseevery h ha Seep D) O (maquir=====eh e adtr sise.dbutas eassetphysiselesmagermelseh design hads erreguineery. . ^ Summamarke basis im step D betsw). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCEI REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l l l l l l l l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 7 I47- 16 Package Sequence No. 8 Revisica 4 F7-CLMDED(C 2f26/98 i l
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 17 ef 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW """"""' CHECKLIST "*""' Responsible Fnpaner (System reamIAnd) Parte Review Requirement Items Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 11. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT If the usodinemeian makes a change that affects a perforsemere parameter, was post-unodificados tesdag identified?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Freesesperrr.e7) O W eseevered by NNECo, sumussantse hash and UIR , CR or dheevery h h Stay D). O (asemiresses 8.m :anysimme.dhasde m.:ashesphyeketesmagarenhah design I hasiserneuestery. , Sumsmaarke hash h step D hetow), C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
4 l l 0 - Parseas Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I47- 17 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDLDOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENT ID: RC MOD- Page18 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW """""6*' CHECKLIST m a me Responsible Fnpaner (Systan TeamImad) Parte Review Requireuseet Itsen Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 12. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT If the anodincation has the potential to change the design snargias for a systesa, have the design anaryins been addressed?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYDiG THE LICENSING /nESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Pre ==ssperre-er) O (Provise$ diseovered by NNECe, summmmutme hash end UIR , CR or eseovery h la stop D) D (negasromessn es met may enshead het dess est asset phyaksi esmAgenden h design hadserreguimeery. . ' Seamunarine basis ha step D helow) i C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: l D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
O - Parseas Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I47-18 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7.CLMDLDOC 2/26/98
( l r DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Page 19 of 26
)
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVF SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW N Nainber CHECKLIST " ** Responsible Engmeer (System Team Lead) Parte Review Requirement Ileen Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 13. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date A. REQUIREMENT If the anodification contains any "teenporary" changes, west these changes analyzed and controlled? l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l l l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS l O DISCREPANCY: O @recessperFF-87)
O grevie= sty discovered by NNECo,sussamartse husts and UIR,CR or discovery docuument ta Step D) Oc, - is not me neelse.d hun d es met safect phys 6 cal ceaeguration docuanessematon, design j heres er . _. ., requiremesses. % huses na seep D below) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: l D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
I 19 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDEDOC 2/26/95
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 20 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW " """6 CHECKLIST " ** Responsible Fntnnaer (System TeamI.med) Parte Review Requiresnest Items Group Status Reviewer Sienature
- 14. Oyes
- ONow 0 NA OINF Date A. REQUIREMENT ,
l If a proposed usodiflemeta= was came.a.d, did it result in procedural changes that could impose an ave *amive l l barden on the plant operators during normal or emnergency operating conditions? B. REQUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS: l O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Proeems perF7-07) ! O (rewiemsh eseevered by NNECe, summmestae hemis med UIR , CR er escovery h h Step D) O (magids====t h m.e any emessed het de m e assee physkeie.ma s es m - d.mies hauts er regedutory ;- , -^ Sumasartse hade h step D helow) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT j
i (1) An affirmative response to this question should be treated as a discrepancy and processed in accordance l l with PP 07. ' l l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 147-20 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
l DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 21 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MOD Number MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST MOD me Responsible Fnpneer (System Team Land) Parte Review Requiremneat Iteen Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 15. Oyes
- ONow 0 NA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT Was a came*I*d unediGcation partially implesmested and not dac==ne=**d properly?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l i O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (FreenesperFr-e7) O F../ , aseevered by NNECe, em hash and tlM , CR er eseewery w in Snap D). O (neemiremens k mee ader inshees het sess met sSect phyuhat osmaguradem och desigm . hostserregaiseery. , Summmunstne basis ha sesp D helow) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O l. D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
(1) An affirmative response to this question should be treated as a discrepancy and pH in accordance with PP-07. O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM.7 I.47- 21 Package Sequence No. 8 } Redsion 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Page 22 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW M D NumW CIIECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer (System Team IM) Parte Review Requirement Item Group Status Reviewer Signature
- 16. O Yes O No O NA O D4F Date A. REQUIREMENT Wert field changes,if performed during the implementation of the modification, mkwed and incorporated l into tbc "as built" documentation?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DECREPANCY: O (Fr.csseperPrer) O (Previoush eheevered by NNECo, samunartse bests and LTR CR or discovery documssed in Step D) O (Requirousset is met fsBy seesSed but does not afect physical-- " _4 '--- "" _ design basis or reguissary regadreensets. 6esansertse basis in step D below) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
0 - Parsons Power Givup Inc. - FORM: 7 747-22 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CIRDEDOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Page 23 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW """""* CHECKLIST " " " ' Responsible Fnpnanr-(System TeamImad) Parte Review Requinament items Group Status Reviewer Sismature
- 17. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date A. VEIIREMENI Bas the inspect of the anodWa*Aa= en the original design analysis, applicable to the ===amled portions of the systems been addivesed? l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATI3FYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Prue==perFr47)
O (Prewnsustrensevered by NNEOs,ammmarks bush sad UIR,CR er ensevery w h Sesy D). O (msgedr=== sus h ==* seiy asehmed net de.s use makse physissies s a er ass - desism nests er residenery _ , ^ % tests en sesy D heaew) C. REFERENCE 4S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT .
l l l l lO 1
- Panens Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 7 I 23 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 l F7-CI. AIDE. DOC 2/26/98
i DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Page 24 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST "**** Resposable Fnpnarr-(Systen Team 1md) Parte Review Requireusset Inem Grome sensus Reviewer sismature is. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date l A. REQUIREMENT If the unodification added or revised a consposest that efects a setpoint, alarus, calibration or operation (logic and/or segmence) have the appropriate pescedures interfaces been identified? B. RFOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (FreesesperFrm) O (Prodsedy asemrod by NNEco, sesmarke basis and UIR ,CR er dheevery w h Star D). O (n.,damassa h ass adir senhand has de.s nos eness ymydami s a erum - desssa e reedrummames, summunske hade in soap D). hans er ros ssary C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT E. MODIFICATIONINTERFACES:
Should the =wl*=tian intedece with Maintenance, Testing or Procedures, the Responsible Engineer will indicate the type LL ce(s) below and iM-*$ advise the procedure and/or test lead en(newer of this interface. l O Maintenance and Test O Procedures ; O Does not interface with Malatemance and Test or Proceduits
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM.7 I47-24 Package Sequence No. If Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENTID: RC-MOD- Page 25 of 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: M DNusmier MODIFICATION REVIEW CHECKLIST M D Me Responsible Engmeer (System TeamImd) j Parte Review Requireanent Itsen Group Status Reviewer Sdgmature
- 19. O Yes O No O NA O INF Date l A. EEDFIREMENT If the snodefication added or redsed a consponent that effects operation, function, surveillance, performance, or tiadag charactedstics have appropdate testing precedures laterfaces been identified?
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (ProcessperPP47) O (Prevt.asty dbeevered by NNEC., summmeertue hash and UIR CR or discovery documsamt ha Step D) O (= : .1 s a :suity ==sha.d 6. d a.: asses physie.i aser m d.comismann ,dessen hosts er resuissary . . _ sammeertse bases en seep D) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l E. MODIFICATIONINTERFACES: i Should the rnodification interface with Maintenance. Testing or Prrad=4 the Responsible Engineer will indicate the type interface (s) below and immediately advise the procedure and/or test lead entnneer of this interface O Maintenance 3dTest O Precedures O Does not interface with Maintenance and Test or Procedures O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I 25 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7-CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
DOCUMENT ID: RC-MOD- Page 26 ef 26 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: MODIFICATION REVIEW " " * ' _ ~ . - CHECKLIST " "* Respanable Fnpnmer-(System Team Leed) Parte Review Requirassent Items Group Status Reviewer Signature 2o. O Yes O No O NA OINF Date l A. REQUIREMENT If the anodification added or revised a comaponent that effects operation, logic, control board, or maale**===ce has the training interface been considered in the anodificadam? B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: I O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS i O DISCREPANCY:- 0 (rs====sperFrm) I O (revvisedy dhe.vered by NNECa, ammmastae hads and IIIR , CR .r disrevery h in Step D) O (n.,isr.- :h anty smess.d hun d m.:assa phyukalesmageradam W dodge hads re.seessay. . - sumunarene hostsin step D) O C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: j U I D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l E. MODIFICATIONINTERFACES: Should the vnadification interface with Maintenance, Testing or Procedures, the Responsible Fnai" Will indicate the type interface (s) below and inunadistely advise the procedure and/or test lead engineer of this interface O Maintenance and Tese O Procedures O Does not interface with Malatemance and Test or Procedures O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 7 I47-26 Package Sequence No. 8 Revision 4 F7 CLMDE. DOC 2/26/98
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPZOJECTINSTRUC110N PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1 . l
)
T1-CL-I-08 . l SYSTEM REVIEW ' CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS OPERATING PROCEDURES - FORM 8 O Signature p_als Prepared: # g n 9P Reviewed: -
=> Jh 7 Approved: / //N 7 6 ./O-f[
Approved: ist)vAJfE oermyemjean=*r O l - Panons Power Gmup Inc. - PI-95 Revision 4 FI41. DOC June 26,1998
MH J ATONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 8 - SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURES REVIEW CHECKLIST 1.1 The purpose of this form is to: e Validate compliance of the NNECo Modification Design Process and resuhs relating to procedures; e Evaluate procedures against the licensing bases and as-built system to determine compliance; and e Document the results to demonstrate whether the requirement has been incorporated 1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power De-at ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE. 1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropnate Revision blockin Part A. 1.4 The MLE, OLE in concert with the OE will review the speci6c checklist requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) discipline, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Parts E and F, the assigrei group (s) and types / prints the reviewer /iapor's name to each speedic checklist requirement. 1.5 The OE interfaces with the moddication reviewers to obtain the list of applicable modi 6 cation and completes Part C adding the appropriate NNECo moddication number, modification title, and Parsons modi 6 cation review checklist identi6 cation number. 1.6 Procedure Checklist Requiranents (Parts E and F) 1.6.1 Using the applicable NNECo Modi 6 cation Package (s) noted in Part C and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) completes Parts E and F of the 1 Checklist following any additional instructions included in Part D. i 1.6.2 If the requirement is a: signed to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided. , 1.6.3 The checklist requirement result should be described in sufHeient detail. The OEliana-*er determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used onlyifrequired. 1 1.6.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector ! checks the appropriate blocks under item B of the requirement, provides a I disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part D, signs and dates the l
- Parsons Power Group lac. -
M- 96 Revisice 4 l M41. DOC June 26,1998
{ yrr.IRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIIN PI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK p . (~ specific requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete. 1.7 The OE of the form assures all the reviewer /mspector inputs are included for I each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector i signature, and (3) date. 1 1.8 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the I individual requirements in Parts E and F that are dispositioned as a
" Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B by providing a sammary disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and sigmng and dating the form. -
1.9 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document. 2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used to generate the specific checkEst questions to be incorporated onto the form. These questions and O V requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Overview Plans, and SSFI/IDI procedures. 2.2 The system review team (SLE, MLE, OLE discipline reviewers, and specialists) will use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review requirements for the selected system. 2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional detail is to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook.
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-97 Revision 4 FI.01. DOC kne 26,1998
MILIRTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION FI41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK l O Q PROCEDURES CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Procedures are reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Form 8.
- 2. The Operations Lead Engineer or Maintenance Lead Engineer shall use the followmg questions / requirements as the basis for preparing the specific review questions to be utihzed by the inspection team.
- 3. The MLE, OLE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
! Note: These questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and does not require the MLE, OLE, OE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system. O o 4. If applicable, the MLE, OLE, OE may use other checklist questions contained in the licensing basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendix A. A. MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES 1 e Review the adequacy and accuracy of the procedure to ensure that the i i component functions are not reduced by the maintenance procedure. e Review the procedure to determine that the precautions and limits are adequate i for equipment protection.
- Review the procedure for conformance with the equipment vendor mantint !
e Review the technical specifications, the FSAR, the design basis and the current i licensing basis to verify appropriate information has been reflected in the procedure. l 4 Determine if system modifications identified by the Tier 1 review process were incorporated into the procedure. l (
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
Pl.98 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
MII3RTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK N'J B. OPERATING. ALARE ABNORMAL. & EMERGENCY PROCEDURES e Verify the procedure satisfies the requirements and plant configuration as defined by technical specifications, the updated final safety analysis report, and the current licensing and design basis.
. Determine if system modifications identified by Tier 1 review process were incorporated in the procedure.
l l 1 O l0
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
Pl.99 Revision 4 PJ41. DOC June 26,1998
DOCUMENT ID: RC-PROC- P ge I of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM PROCEDURES CHECKLIST Responmble Engmeer PART A PROCEDURES CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 me=*ree* se se L ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - - -
Mechamcaliend , Doctncallead Control S)Wemslead PipmWStructurallend operations Engmeer Procedures Fnpnm Testing Engmeer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
System Lead Fnene SVSRImad Engmeer PART B SYSTEM PROCEDURES OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS
SUMMARY
lastructions: (1) The SLE will review the attached checklist and suppleasental usaterial and indicate whether the NNECo Procedures adequately considered or incorporated the ladicated requirements into the system. (2) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to ladicate the requiressent itema amnber(s) under the appropriate Revisloa and assure all discrepeacN nie pescessed per PP-07. REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 L Are the procedures as they relate to the system O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No satisfactory lacorporated or will be incorporated into the systeen design?
- 2. Sunuaaryof Discrepancy (les) Items Signature SLE/Date I
i i l l m I (d 1
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 8 I 1 Package Sequence No. 9 Revision 3 RCLP. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-PROC- Page 2 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM PROCEDURES CHECKLIST Responsible Fntnnner; (System Team Imad) l PART C APPLICABLE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS Instnactions: (1) The MIE, OLE suammarises the applicable anodifications that may effect the system procedures and ladicates them below. Note: Only these modifications affectmg the system are to be reviewed, ne~ input is provided from the system modification checklist.
- 1. APPLICABLEMODIFICATIONS I
The following anodifications are applicable nad need to be miewed agalast the checklist requirements and licensing basis: NNEco Mod Reference Modification Iteen Number Modification Title Review Checklist 1. O
)
I I O - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 8 Ies.2 Package Sequence No. 9 , Revision 3 l F8,CIE. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-PROC. Page 3 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM PROCEDURES CHECKLIST Resposable Fngmasv-(Svsteen Teamland) PART D CHECKIJMT REVIEW INSTRUCTION Instructions: For each requirennent listed belaw: (1) SLE, MLE,012, OE and systesa tesen develops the specific requireanents to be reviewed uslag the generic questions la the lastruction and A**=rh===t A Source Book. Egh requiressent will be given a new itosa nuanber and include steps A, B, C, and D. (2) Each toquireasset will be camnarutively aunsbered starting with I (one). (3) 'Ibe Systeam 14.ed Engineer will assign the review group responsible for reviewlag each requireansat. Madamical = M Electrical = E, Controls - IAC, Testing = T, Procedures = P, Operations = 0 (4) The ladividual that reviews the requiresnest will alem and date. provide a disposition, indicate laterfaces, and provide a response based spen the fonowing-
- n. Yes Requireasosst is satisfactedly addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No
-- ' "--'results is required.
- b. No Requirennent is not satisfacterey addressed or discrepeat condittom exists. Provide an explanation of how the requireanent was not satisfled. Include reference source (s), revision, and date, as applicable. Disposition the condition as a DISCREPANCY and classify the basis la step B. The responsible individual shnu t===d6=*=sy advise the SLE of any requireensat being dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY in accordance with Project Procedure PP 47. I=leimeia= of PP-47 wul be by the OE. Process and procedural ek , "= not dispositioned in a< ardance with PP-47 will be analysed by Tier 3.
- c. NA Requireeneat is not applicable. Expl===esa= should be included only ifit cladfies the disposition.
- d. INF Requirennent could not be verifled because tafornaation could not be found. If am RAIwas generated to clarify the requireusent, the RAI tumsber and subsequent NNEco response reference is to be provided. In Part D ladicate the inforenaties could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible individual shau i===diately advise the SI2 of any requirennent being dispositioned as a DISCREPANCY. Initistles of PP-47 wiu be by the OL l
l
\
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 8 I48-3 Package Sequence No. 9 Revision 3 PB_CIE. DOC 12/22/97 l -
DOCUMENT ID: RC-PROC- Page 4 of a MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM PROCEDURES CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team Imed) PART E OPERATING, ALARM, ABNORMAL, AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES l Parte Review Requirennent Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No DNA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT
. I B. REQUIREMENT IS CONSIDERED AS:
O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Proc.m per FF-47) O (Prev 6.ady db.evered by NNEC .ummed.e b b nd IER,CR.r ese.very d- h Semy D) O (= . i.e.:any m.s.a h e 4 e.shee physk. aser.ai a.c e.es.m,a ism h sh er res.s.sory . . se d h.d. h .e., p> C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 8 I 4 Package Sequence No. 9 Revision 3 F8.CIE. DOC 12/22/97
i DOCUMENT ID: RC-PROC- Page 5 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: l SYSTEM PROCEDURES CHECKLIST Respamble Engneer ! PART F MAINTENANCE PROCEDURES l PartF Review Requirement Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes ONo DNA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT ,
l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Prwass per FF-07) l O (Provs==say aheeved by NNECo, summertue bests and 1lIR , CR or discovery h ha Step D) O (= , - ^ k == sultr sensasa b.:e.s.n. as.ct physk=le s a uren e d- 4.s a s hash eresummery. ,- - sensmutse hash in seer p). (/ . 1 C. REFERENCES & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT i
O - Parsons Power Gesup Inc. - FORM: 8 I 48 - 5 Package Sequence No. 9 Revision 3 FB CIP. DOC 12/22/97
MILISTONE UNIT 2 - SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK T1-CL-I-09 . SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS TESTING - FORM 9 Sinnature Data Prepared: 44797 Reviewed: - c ;> c;79 9[ Approved: <- /M (o-80-97 Approved: Iv<)VM Tb Deputy Project Director 'O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI-100 Revision 4 P!41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS3PROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CIIECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 9 - SYSTEM TESTING REVIEW CHECKIET 1.1 The purpose of this form is to: e Validate compliance of the NNECo Modification Design Process and results relating to testing;
- Evaluate testing against the licensing bases including the technical ,
speci6 cations to determine compliance; and
. Document the results to demonstrate whether the requirement has been incorporated. )
1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, I system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE. 1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision blockin Part A. 1.4 The TLE in concert with the OE will review the specific checklist requirements and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) discipline, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Part E through G, the assigned group (s) and types / prints the reviewer /mspector's name to each speci6c checklist requirement. O b 1,5 The OE interfaces with the modi 6 cation reviewers to obtain the list of applicable modi 6 cations and completes Part C adding the appropriate NNECo modification number, modification title, and Parsons modi 6 cation review checklist identi6 cation number. 1.6 Procedure Checklist Requirements (Part E through G) 1.6.1 Using the applicable NNECo Modification Package (s) noted in Part C and other NNECo input documents as applicable, the OE(s) completes Parts E through G of the Checklist following any additional instructions included in Pmt D. 1.6.2 If the requirement is assigned to another reviewer / specialist, the OE is responsible to track and assure the requirement input is provided. 1.6.3 The checklist requirement result should be described in sufficient detail. The j OE/mspector determine the depth of the review. Wordy paragraphs are to be used onlyifrequired. 1.6.4 Upon completion of review of the checklist requirement, the assigned inspector checks the appropriate blocks under item B of the requirement, provides a disposition in accordance with the instructions in Part D, signs and dates the l t V '
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
PI 101 Revision 4 PI.01. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI 41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISIS AND WORKBOOK speci6c requirement (s). This signature indicates that the inspection of this requirement is complete. 1.7 The OE of the form assures all the reviewer /mspector inputs are included for each requirement and that the requirement has a (1) disposition, (2) inspector signature, and (3) date. 1.8 The OE submits the form and checklist to the SLE who reviews each of the individual requirements in Parts E through G that are dispositioned as a
" Discrepancy." The SLE completes Part B by providing a anmmmy disposition, indicating any discrepancy requirement number (s), and signing and dating the form. -
1.9 The OE submits the form and checklist (s) to the interface reviewers in accordance with the General Instructions for Review and Approval in Section 6.0 of this document. 2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 2.1 The attached requirements and questions are to be used to generate the specific checklist questions to be incorporated onto the form. These questions and A requirements are based upon the NRC Order, Overview Plans, and SSFI/IDI V procedures. 2.2 The system review team (SLE, TLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will use these requirements / questions to generate the system specific review requirements for the selected system. 2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional detailis to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system workbook. I l l O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
M- 102 Revisica 4 E01. DOC June 26,1998 1
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYS2FROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS13 AND WORKBOOK TRAINING AND TESTING CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. Testing is reviewed using the following checklist (s) and the results of the review ,
are recorded on Form 9.
- 2. The Testing Lead Engineer (TLE) shall use the following que,stions/ requirements as the basis for preparing the speci6c review questions to be utihzed by the inspection team.
- 3. The TLE, OE reviews the following questions, expanding them as required, and completes the appropriate system specific form in the workbook.
Note: These questions / requirements are customized for each selected system and does not require the TLE, OE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system. !
- 4. If applicable, the TLE, OE may use other checklist question contained in the !
licensing basis checklist, modification checklist or Appendtx A. A. TRAINING PROCEDURES
- Do the training procedures reflect the present plant configuration? '
- Do the training procedures reflect the current plant configurations and equipment of the system?
e Review the operator training procedure for the system for technical completeness. Ensure that the training procedures incorporate system l modifications and that the operators are trained on the modifications.
- .* Determine ifimplementing personnel receive adequate training for the system l
and if the training is consistent with the level of detail in the implementing procedures.
- Has the Simulator been updated to reflect modifications to the unit?
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 103 ' Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCIlON FI 41 i
~
SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK l B. PRE-OPERATION AND POST MAINTENANCE TESTING e Verify that the Pre-operational or post maintenance test and acceptance cdteria demonstrated that the System met the required critical performance / functional requirements.
. Verify the system alignment and test conditions demonstrate performance functional / requirements.
- Review calculations used to establish test results acceptance criteria for acceptable analytical approach and correct testing con 6guration.
. Verify that the Design Basis information was correctly in,corporated into the pre-operational testing procedures with appropriate acceptance criteria.
- The reviewer should determine if the system has been adequately tested to demonstrate that it can perform the intended safety function. This review should include initial tests performed by the manufacturer, start-up testing and pre-operational testing
. Review the program for post maintenance testing of components prior to declaring them operable. The post modi 6 cation testing should demonstrate that the system functional capability has been restored / maintained.
- Review the measuring and test equipment requirements to ensure the f) v equipment can measure the parameter to the accuracy necessary to assure proper operation.
l
- Review the testing procedures to ensure that the method for measuring the parameter is appropriate for the physical condition of the plant.
- Review post test data reduction and analysis. Are the results of the analysis consistent with test conditions / assumptions and recognized analytical methods?
Does the post test analysis satisfy test acceptance criteria? e Review data sheets for signatures of personnel performing the test (s). C. SURVEILLANCE AND PERIODIC TESTING e Verify that the procedure satisfies the requirements contained in technical j specifications, the FSAR, and the current licensing basis and design basis. ! e Vedfy the test conditions accurately reflect actual plant conditions during : system critical function operations.
- Determine if system modifications identified by Tier 1 review process were incorporated in the procedure.
I
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
l Pi-104 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
DOCUMENT ID: RC-TEST- Page 1 of rr MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ( ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM TESTING CHECKLIST Responsible Engmeer (System Team land) PARTA TESTING CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 se e se L ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - - _
y ,chaniest w Electricaliend Control Systemslead Piping / Structural Lead Operations Fngin,,r Procedures Fnpnner Testing Fninne
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
System Lead Engmeer SYSRlead Fnen-PART B SYSTEM TESTING OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS
SUMMARY
Instructicas: (1) The SLE will review the attached cisecklist nad suppleasantal material nad indicate whether NNEco Inservice Inspection and Testing adequately considered or incorporated the indicated requirsassats into the systent (2) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirensent item number (s) ander the appropriate Revision sad assure all discrepancies are processed per PP-47. REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2
- 1. Have thelaservice laspections and tests es O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No as they relate to the systeen satisfactory 9y incorporated or will be incorporated into the system desiga7
- 2. Sumunaryof Discrepancy (les) Items i
Signatme SLE/Date
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 9 I-49 1 Package Sequence No.10 Resiston 3 P9_CLT. DOC 12/22/97 (
I DOCUMENTID: RC-TEST- Page 2 of xx g MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM TESTING CHECKLIST l Responsible Fngmarr l (System Team Lead) PART C APPLICABLE SYSTEM MODIFICATIONS ! Instructions: (1) he TLE susumarines the applicable anodincations that usey eNect the systema procedures and indicates the.s64.w. l l Note: Only these maMir=hans affecting the system are to be reviewed. The input is provided fmm the system
~
I modification ebwHst.
- 1. APPLICABLE MODIFICATIONS ne following imodincations are applicable and need to be reviewed agalast the cheddist requironments and lirammiaqr basis:
NNECo Mod Reference Modification Items Number Modification Title Review CW l. O l i I I 1 I l l (
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM *9 : I49-2 Package Sequence No.10 l Revision 3 79 CLT. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENTID: RC-TEST- Page 3 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM TESTING CHECKLIST Responsible Fnywr PART D CHECKLIST REVIEW INSTRUCTION Instructions: For each requirement listed in ERE11 through EELfc below: l (1) SLE, TII, OE and systema teams develops the specific requirements to be reviewed using the generic i' questions in the lastruction and Attachment A Source Rook. Egh requireesent will be given a new 16ees [ member and include steps A, R, C, and D. l (2) Each requirement will be -r- =CJj membered starting with 1 (one). (3) The System Imad Engineer will assign the review group responsible for redewtag each requirensent.
- l. Mechaalcal = M, Electrical = E, Centrols = IAC Testing = T. Procedures = P. Operations = O (4) The individual that reviews the requireusent will alan and date, prwride a disposities, indicate laterfaces, and provide a reopease based upon the following:
- a. Yes Requirement is satisfactory addressed. Include reference source, revision, and date. No e=pa===*ia='resuks is required.
- b. No Requirement is not satisfacterey addressed or discrepast condities exists. Provide an explanation
- of how the requiresneat was not satisfied. Incinde refierence source (s), revision, and date, as ;
l ._,;" "- Disposities the condities as a DISCREPANCY and classify the basis la step R. The ! l responsible indMdual shall lasasediately advise the SLE of any requirement being dispositiemed as l a DISCREPANCY la accordance with Project Procedure PP 47. Initiatice of PP-47 will be by the OL Process and precedural dis.. _, -M== not dispositiemed la accordance with PP 47 will be analysed by Tier 3.
- c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Erpl===*Aa= should be imeluded only ifit clarifles the dispositie
- d. INF Requiressent could met be verifled because inforssaties could not be found. If as RAI was I genersted to clarify the requirement, the RAI numsber and subsequent NNECo response reference l
is to be provided. In Part D indicate the inforusaties could not be found and disposities as a i DISCREPANCY. The responsible individual shall i==aha*aly advise the SLE of any l requirement belag ;- "'- d as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of PP-47 will be by the OE. l l Note: Systems review to consider test procedures, results, and/or calibrations. l l
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 9 I 3 Package Sequence No.10 Revision 3 P9,,,CLT. DOC 12/22/97 l
7 i DOCUMENT ID: RC-TEST- Page 4 of n MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: l ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: , SYSTEM TESTING l CHECKLIST Responable Fnpneer-(System Team Lead) PART E TRAINING AND TESTING PROCEDURES Parte Review Requiressent Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No ONA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT -
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Fr.c perFr47) O g..c ,, discovered by NNFra, sammanute hesis and UIR , CR er escovay d- en Step D) O (= . ^ is met ase n ama but as.s a.s swe physsemic.nasuransm aece meme 4mmsen basis or. . , . , _ _ ^ Summmadse beds k sesy D) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
1 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 9 I 09 - 4 Package Sequence No.10 Revision 3 F9,,,CLT. DOC 12/22/97
l DOCUMENTID: RC-TEST- Page 5gof g , MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ) ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM TESTING l CHECKLIST l Respannble Eagmeer (System Team Lead) PART F PRE-OPERATIONAL AND POST TESTING PartF Review Requirement Iteen Group Status Reviewer's Signature i
- 1. O Yes O No DNA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT -
1 l B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: l 0 SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS i O DISCREPANCY: O (rm =perFr47) O (Pmisedy dhcovered by NNECo, summmmhe basis and UIR , CR er discovery 4~-==* In Step D) O (* , ' b met AAy - but does set adrect phyukal esmagurassen M- design basis er regudasery; , - ^- Summmartse basis in assy D) C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l
l l 0 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 9 I 5 Package Sequence No.10 Revision 3 F9_CLT. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-TEST- Page .6 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: l i ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: l SYSTEM TESTING ! CHECKLIST Responsible Fngmaer (Systaan Teamland) PART G SURVEILLANCE AND PERIODIC TESTING PartG Review Requirement Iseus Group status Reviewer's Signature
- 1. O Yes O No DNA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT -
B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Fr p.rrr-e7) O (rrevi.unty sheev rea byNNECe,s n.m.rtu h d..ma UIR,CR.rsi.eev ryhin St.y D). O (R.g ar ek m.:ader sme.a h.:a s.c physic.i ap reen a.a e si ,s sism had..eresuhe.ry. . same. rem hash ha se.p D) C. REFERENCEfS) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE-D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT l0
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 9 I89-6 Package Sequence No.10 Revision 3 79 CLT. DOC 12/22/97
MILLSTONE UhTr2 SYS2PROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-01 SYSRIMPLEMENTNflON CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O
~
4 T1-CL-I-10 . SYSTEM REVIEW CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS WALKDOWN - FORM 10 I i [ l l l Sinnature Datt Prepared: M ' d-J717 Reviewed: 98 Approved: ( /NT 4 - C - 97 Approved: MdFUh l ( - Parsons Power Grump Inc. - l PI- 105 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
l MILIETONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-41 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK 1.0 FORM 10 - SYSTEM WAIXDOWN REVIEW CHFCETET 1.1 The purpose of this formis to:
- Provide in plant review of system configuration; e Evaluate status ofphysical system configuration against design documents and requirements; and
. Document the results to demonstrate whether the requirement has been incorporated.
1.2 The OE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsibl' e SLE. 1.3 Upon initiation of the form, the OE signs and dates the appropriate Revision blockin Part A. 1.4 The SLE in concert with the LE will develop the system speciSc checklist attributes to be reviewed by walkdown and assign each requirement to the (1) OE, (2) reviewer, or (3) specialist reviewer. The OE adds to Part C, each attribute to be validated by field walkdown. O 1.5 The system shall be walked down to confirm conformance with the P&ID. O Piping supports type, general location, and configuration. , The system shall be walked down in detail to confirm that the as-built condition l , conforms with the design base drawings and documents,m' cluding verification l of: I
- a. Support type, location (dimensional verification), and configuration. '
- b. Instrument line route, supports, and slopes.
- c. Separation and support ofraceways carrying circuits of the modified portion of the selected systems.
l l l t v l - Parsons Power Group Inc. - PI- 106 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
MILLSTOhT UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SVSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK l l l 2.0 CHECKLIST REVIEW REQUIREMENTS l l 2.1 The attached questions are to be revised as required to generate the specific ! attributes to be incorporated onto the form. These attributes are based upon the NRC Order, Overview Plans, and SSFI/IDI procedures. 2.2 The system review team (GLE, SLE, discipline reviewers, and specialists) will use these attributes to generate the system specific review attributes for the l selected system. 2.3 Based upon the system selected, the review team will determine what additional attributes are to be provided and incorporate it into the customized system l workbook. O O
- Panons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 107 Revision 4 FI 01. DOC June 26,1998
MM.I ATONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECELISTS AND WORKBOOK WALKDOWN (AS-BUILT VERIFICATION) CHECKLIST INSTRUCTIONS
- 1. The unit's system con 6guration is reviewed using the following checklist and the results of the review are recorded on Fonn 10.
- 2. The System Lead Faoinaar shall use the following attributes as the basis for preparing the specific review attributes to be valid =*ad by the inspection team.
- 3. The SLE reviews the following attributes, = rending or deleting them as required, l l and completes the appropriate system speciSc form in the workbook.
1 Note: These attributes are custonuzed for each selected system and do not require l the SLE to include each question ifit is not applicable to the selected system , 4. If applicable, the SLE may use other checklist question contained in the licensing l basis checkhst or Appendix A. A.WALKDOWN
- Perform walkdowns on 100% of the acce= Ale portion of the system to assure that the as-built con 6guration agreed with the applicable P&ID ofrecord. This l' walkdownincludes veri 6 cation for:
L a) Pipe size. b) Connnretion of component (i.e. fittings, flanges, valve class, etc.) pressure ratings,ifpossible. c) Confirmation that all lines, inline valves / equipment and branches are in the correct sequence d) Reducers are correctly oriented on the P&ID. I e) All abandoned branch lines are noted. f) Flanged connections are properly shown. g) Proper flows or arrows are indicated. h) System interface and continuations to other hydraulic systems i) Valves, pumps, heat exchangers for size and manufacturer's label. j) Indication of correct valve type (gate, ball, globe, butterfly ,etc.) is shown on P&ID.
- Perseas Power Group Inc. -
PI- 108 Revision 4 PI01. DOC June 26,1998 L
MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCI10N FI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK k) Valve locking devices are installed as indicated on the P&ID and position (locked open or closed).
- 1) Specialty items such as flex hoses, strainers, and ori6ces and any heat tracing are shown in the proper location.
m) All thermowells and temperature indicators are imlicated on P&ID. n) Observe areas for possiblejet impingement and II/I (Anti-falldown) concerns o) Note pump suction and discharge bends, reducer locations, tees, branch connections, etc. for erosion / corrosion concerns. ! e Record critical system valve and component nameplate data from all accesrible, visible and legible nameplates. This information is to be presented in the
" Mechanical and Electrical Nameplate Identification" book. Verify valve and component identification tagging labels to be in place for each P&ID
.x.g.:.==e l e Perform a detailed inea-+ ion to cowwe the system as-built configuration with the P&ID. The b;+1on reviews the equipment location, equipment tagging and identification, heat tracing installation, subcomponent identification and location (i.e. valve limit switches), and location oflocal contra Electrical data from system component nameplates imiuding O distri, . ion panels, transformers, motors, heat tracing, solenoid valves, motor operated valves and limit switches is to be collected. This information is recorded on the Nameplate Data sheets e Walkdown and inspect Raceways (Non-Support) for the following:
A. PhysicalCharacteristics Cable raceways, i-lading cable tray and conduits, to confirm location, type, size, identification, color coding, vibration / thermal gap, tray covers (including location and installation) versus that depicted on the plant raceway drawings and required by the installation specification. Additionally, assure physical continuity by inea-+ ion of splice plates, fasteners and other related installation hardware. B. Separation Criteria Confirm vertical and horizontal sepa'nons of raceway in accordance with those required by the Electrical Separation Specification - Millstone Unit 2, SP-M2-EE-0016. Separation review also consist of barrier installation
- (including confirmation of the presence of designed raceway enclosures), i crossover separation and cable installation to confinn color coding with l l channel requirements.
l'
- Farness Power Group Inc. - )
l PI- 109 Revision 4 ! PI-01. DOC - June X,1998 l I
]
Iws uTONE UNIT 2 SVSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLIS'Is AND WORKBOOK C. Firestops Raceways penetrating solid walls or floors to confirm the presence and condition of firestops. Also long runs of venical tray (> 20 ft.) for the presence offirestops. D. Grounding Confirm the installation of ground cable, bonding and connection to the plant ground grid.
. Review a sampling of electrical raceways to exarnine the raceway spans, support types and =*=d c-- 4, lengths, size of structural components and loading ofraceway and supports as well as additionally defined acceptable or un==> table conditions and interactions.
- Review system components, when accessible, to confirm that the grminriing installation was in accordance with the electrical installation specification.
- Perform a cursory inWon of all accessible pipe supports in the system to l verify the support resembled its design drawing. This inWon addresses and confirms-O a) Support type, size, direction and hiiMing stmeture attached to.
b) Standard support components and structural members c) Surface mounted plates and anchorages. d) Welds. e Verify that the physical pipmg configuration installed in the plant was consistent with the analyzed piping configuration:
- 1. Piping Field Measuring Tolerances i
- a. Verify field dunensions for pipe to the nearest 1/4" within +/- 1".
- b. Record dimensions for piping that is skewed more than +/-5' relative to j the global axis.
- c. Verify the location of all vents and drains to the nearest 1/4".
- d. Verifylocation and direction ofpipe supports.
- e. Verify the type and thickness ofinsulation. l O
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
M - 110 Revision 4 M-01. DOC hoe 26,1998 l
MILIETONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION FI-el i _ _ SVSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISYS AND WORKBOOK
- 2. Piping Component Identification on Isometric Drawings
- a. For naia=>1=+ad piping, identify and confirm all piping components.
- b. Verify branch connection type and nominal size.
l c. When insulation removal is not practical, identify components to the extent possible.
- d. Record all data plate information.
- e. Confirm valve operator orientation.
- 3. Pipe Supports onIsometric Drawings -
- a. Identify support type, direction, and building stmeture a***^hmant
- 4. Pipe Support Tolerances on Isometric Drawings
- a. Verify angles and orientation shown on isometric are within +/-5*.
- b. Verify pin to pin dimensions for struts and snubbers
- c. Identify any welded a++=chmaata where Vrt violations occur.
O 5. WeldIdentification
- a. Verify weld type and size. l
- b. Measure fillet weld sizes n+ilidae weld size gauges.
. Confirm the adequacy of the deiman'ad HPSI tubing design basis. The NNECo tubing isometric drawings serve as the design basis documents for the in-plant installations.
- 1. Tuhl== Ron+ino Isometric drawings were reviewed against the as-installed tubing configurations, spacificaHy for conf ==&g tubing segment lengths, )
orientations, and inclusion of all existing system tubing on the drawings ;
- 2. Tnhina Suanarts Isometric drawings were reviewed against the as- i installed tubing configurations, spanifically for confo A.g tubing support locatics, support restraint demgn functions, supports shown on d.e i drawings but not installed, supports installed but not shown on the drawings, and any deficient installations.
. Verify the seismic adequacy of accessible equipment needed to bring the plant to a safe shutdown condition following an earthquake which is equivalent to
- Perseas Power Group Inc. -
Pl.111 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC June 26,1998
l parrJ A10NE UNIT 2 SYS2FROJECTINSTRUCTI3N FI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK
~
the plant's licensing basis safe shutdown ennhquake (SSE). This required equipmaat is identified on a Safe Shutdown Equipmaat List (SSEL).
. Identify if there are seismic interaction concerns at Millstone Unit 2 by a sampling walkdown Criteria for two-over-one walkdown is given in "ICAVP Two-Over-One Walkdown" (Mehmaat 4). A brief summary of the criteria is given below.
- l. I. Interaction of Class Ilitems with Class I items of equal or greater mass is considered not to cause significant damage to the Class litem.
- 2. Items supponed on threaded rod or other flexible supports that can swing l are assumed to swing no more than 12" l
- 3. ' A number of support attrilxrtes can initiate a failure:
- a. Short threaded rods fixed at their anchor po~ m t.
- b. Threaded rod with castironinserts l i
- c. Beam clamps that rely on friction to support vertical loads.
- d. Inadequate supports.
- e. Very long spans for supported systems
- f. Supports withinadequate welds.
- g. Weaklink anchors boks
- h. Deteriorated or substandard components such as cracked or spilled l
concrete around anchors, severely rusted items, missing bolts, loose connections, etc.
- i. Runs that are not attached to and can slide off of their supports.
- j. Cast iron supports on piping systems
- k. Relatively short or rigid supports on a line with more flexible i supports. The rigid support will attract more than its share of the seismicload. l
- Perform an Instrument & Controls walkdown of the HPSI system iWAino field instruments, Spec 200 and ESAS cabinets, main control boards and simulator, and appropriate switchgear and determine compliance of the observed field conditions to the design documents Use the I&C field walkdown worksheets, photographs and design document mark ups to record resuhs O
- Parseas Power Group Inc. -
PI- 112 Revision 4 PI-01. DOC J ne26,1998
DOCUMENTID: RC-WALK- Page 1 of xx l MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM WALKDOWN l CHECKLIST Responsible Fngneer' l PART A WALKDOWN CHECKLIST CLOSE-OUT REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2 se se m==e* e
- 1. ORIGINATOR
- 2. REVIEWED - - -
MechanicalI. mad Electricallend Control Systems Lead Piping / Structural Lead Operations Fnpneer Fisl .Fnpneer Testing Engmeer
- 3. APPROVAL - - -
System Lead Fneneer SVSRIead Engmeer PART B SYSTEM WALKDOWN OBSERVATIONS & FINDINGS
SUMMARY
Inst:1 actions: (1) "Ibe SLE will review the attached checklist and supplemental material and indicate whether the *as built" conditions are la conformance with the applicable systema design documentation. (2) For each DISCREPANCY found during the audit, the SLE is to indicate the requirement item number (s) under the appropriate Revision and assure all discrepancies are processed per PP.47. REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2
- 1. Does the as built conditions reflect the O Yes O No O Yes O No O Yes O No design documentation as it relates to the system?
- 2. Samunaryof Discrepancy (les) Items j Signature SLE/Date i
4
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
FORM: 10 I 1 Package Sequence No.11 Revision 3 F10,,CLWB. DOC 12/22/97
DOCUMENT ID: RC-WALK- Page .2 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM WALKDOWN CHECKLIST Responsible Fngmaer-(System Team Lead) PART C WALKDOWN CHECKLIST Instructions: Por each requirement listed below: (1) GLE, SLE, OE and system team develops the spedfic toquirements to be reviewed using the generic questless la the Instruction and A**=rh===* A source book. Enh requirement will be given a new iteam numsber and ladede steps A, B, C, and D. (2) Each requiressent will be m _=C./; numbered starting with 1 (see). (3) The Systems IAnd Engineer will assign the review group responsible for reviewing each requireaneet. IWarh==le=1 = M. Electrical = E, Centrols = IAC, Testing = T, Procedures = P, Operstless = 0 , (4) The individual abat reviews the requirement will sinn and date. provide a disposition, ladicate laterfaces, i and provide a response based upon the following:
- a. Yes Requireanent is satisfactory addressed. Indade reference source, revision, and date. No explanation /results is required.
, b. No Requinanent is met satisfactory addressed or discrepent condities exists. Provide an expla==*5a= l of how the requirement was not satisfied. Indade reference source (s), revision, and date, as applicable. Disposition the condition as a DISCREPANCY and dessify the basis in step B. The responsibleindividual shall * ; advise the SLE of any requiressent being di; '" - f as a DISCREPANCY in accordance with Project Procedure PP-47. i=8tiattaa of PP-47 will be by the OL Process and procedural discrepancies not dispositioned in accordance with PP-47 will be analysed by Tier 3.
- c. NA Requirement is not applicable. Expla==*ia= should be laduded only ifit clarifles the disposition.
- d. INF Requirement could not be vertfled because infor==tia= could not be found. If an RAI was generated to cladfy the requirement, the RAI number and subsequent NNEco response reference is to be provided. In Part D indicate the taforinaties could not be found and disposition as a DISCREPANCY. The responsible ladividual shall i==ad'=taly advise the SLE of any requirement being dispositiemed as a DISCREPANCY. Initiation of PP-47 will be by the OL 1
l l 1 l l 1 - Parsons Power Group Inc. - l FORM: 10 1 2 Package Sequence No.11 Revision 3 Ple CLWB. DOC 12/22/97
i DOCUMENTID: RC-WALK- Page 3 of xx MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM WALKDOWN CHECKLIST Responsible Fnp-(System Team Lead) PartC Review Requirement Itsen Group Status Reviewer's Signature L 0 Yes O No DNA O INF Date A. REQUIREMENT B. REOUIREMENTIS CONSIDERED AS: O SATISFYING THE LICENSING / DESIGN BASIS O DISCREPANCY: O (Fr -s pe rt4ry O g.. .- --; ah e a by NNECo, sumsmarke hads med UIR,CR er discovery h h Step D) O (m.eis hm.taesenha.s butdoes metadbetphysicalcamagurunenh design b.sh r am y; . - s meh. hun hi ss., e). C. REFERENCE (S) & SOURCE / REVISION / DATE: O D. REVIEW
SUMMARY
/ RESULT 1
l l' O - Persons Power Group Inc. - FORM: 10 I-10 -3 Package Sequence No.11 g Revision 3 Fle_CLWB. DOC 12/2267
- _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - L
j MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTIEN PI 41 SYSRIMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O
~
{ T1-CL-I-CO i SYSTEM REVIEW CLOSE-OUT l INSTRUCTIONS - FORM CO O 1 l l l ! j l Signature Dgig i Prepared: & 49 97 l Reviewed: 49 (( l Approved: ////7' [p .3d- ff Approved: DPd FMN D4mty Project Director lt
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 113 Revision 4 PI41. DOC June 26,1998
IwnJRTONE UNIT 2 SYSRPROJECTINSTRUCTION PI-01 SYSR IMPLEMENTATION CHECKLISTS AND WORKBOOK O I.. re co-SvSrE EviEw ctoSE-our 1.1 The purpose of this fonn is to provide a anmmary checklist that all applicable review forms have been assembled, reviewed and approved. 1.2 The SLE adds the Parsons Power Document ID number, NNECo system code, system title to the form header, and indicates the responsible SLE. 1.3 The SLE assemblies the Review package using the Sequence number at the bottom of each form. 1.4 The SLE completes Part A by indicating whether the form is completed or not required, adds the respective form Document Identification Numbers, and vedfies that the attached forms have been completed, reviewed and approved. Note: A second sheet can be attached if there are several document of the same type. Indicate in the blank to "See Attached" and list the documents on this Page. l l 1.5 The SLE signs and dates the Package and Close-out Cover sheet and submits , them to the SVSR GLE and Deputy Project Director fo approval. l l l l l l 1 O
- Persons Power Group Inc. -
PI- 114 Revision 4 PI 01. DOC June 26,1998
l
)
i DOCUMENTID: SCO. Page _LgL1 MILLSTONE UNIT 2 SYSTEM CODE: ICAVP SVSR SYSTEM: SYSTEM REVIEW CLOSE-OUT . Responsible Fnpneer* PART A SYSTEM CLOSE-OUT CHECKLIST Instructions: 1. Assemble the SVSR Tier I review package accordmg to the sequence number at the bottom of each fann.
- 2. The System Lead Engmeer will verify that all attached forms have been completed and signed by the respective int,rr r;" engmeermg groups
- 3. 'Ibe System lead Fneneer will close-out the system review package b'y indicating the status of the ='tached forms, sign and date below to indicate the SVSR Tier I reviewis e~aa1M
- 4. The SVSR Team i rader will approve that the system review is completed and sign and date below. j
- 5. The Deputy Project Director concurs that the system has been adequately reviewed and indienta his approval by I signing and dating below. 1 The following attachmaats are made a part of this review package:
O Completed O NA SSBD - Form 1 System Scope and Boundary 0 Completed O NA LBCD - Form 2 Licensmg Bases - Current (Resision xx of the FSAR l 0 Completed O NA RC-SLB - Form 3 System Design Input and Licensing Bases wiin O Completed O NA RC-CA - Form 4 System Corrective Action c hu+iin O Completed O NA SMSS- Form 5 System Madshtian Screen Summary 0 Completed O NA SMSL - Form 6 System Modification Summary Listing O Completed O NA RC-MOD - Form 7 System Modification Reviewchu+11e O Completed O NA RC-PROC - Form 8 System Fina cha+1ie O Completed O NA RC-TEST - Form 9 System Testing Checklist O Completed O NA RC-WALK - Form 10 System Walkdown ch~+1ia PART B SYSTEM REVIEW COMPLETED REVISION 0 REVISION 1 REVISION 2
% s% se
- 1. System 14ad Engineer
- 2. Approval - - -
SVSR Lead Fnpatr Deputy Project Manager i V
- Parsons Power Group Inc. -
! FORM: CO l I-CO - 1 Package Sequence No.1 Revision 2 FCO_COUT. DOC 9/23/97}}