ML20151J297

Forwards Emergency Plan Review Georgia Inst of Technology Research Reactor. Plan Does Not Satisfy 10CFR50,App E Requirements,Rev 1 to Reg Guide 2.6 Guidance & ANSI/ANS-15.16-1982.Rev to Plan Requested

ML20151J297
Person / Time
Site:	Neely Research Reactor
Issue date:	06/21/1984
From:	Thomas C Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Karam R Neely Research Reactor, ATLANTA, GA
References
NUDOCS 8406270031
Download: ML20151J297 (2)

Text

--____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

JUN 2 1 1984 DISTRIBUTION:

Docket:FilT3 e -

NRC PDR DCS Docket No. 50-160 SSPB Reading E. Bates F. Pagano Dr. Ratib A. Karam Region II School of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics P. Anderson (3)

Neely Nuclear Research Center R. Carter H. Berkow Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332

Dear Dr. Karam:

The staff has completed its initial review of the proposed Georgia Institute of Technology research reactor emergency plan submitted on September 3,1982.

The plan was reviewed against the requirements of Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50, the guidance criteria set forth in Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 2.6 and ANSI /ANS-15.16-1982, " Emergency Planning for Research Reactors." Non-power reactor licensees were requested by generic letter dated June 16, 1982 to use these documents to meet the requirements of the amended emergency planning regulations.

Based on its review, the staff has concluded that the proposed Georgia Institute of Technology emergency plan does not yet fully satisfy the requirements of the guidelines of the above-mentioned documents. Accordingly, we request that you revise the plan to include the additional information identified in the enclosed staff Emergency Plan Review within 60 days of the date of this letter. Following receipt of your revisions, the staff will continue its review. If you have any questions, please contact Robert Carter, our Project Manager for your facility, at(301)492-9795.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely,

/s/

Cecil 0. Thomas, Chief Standardization & Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing l

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next page S  : -

L son:dk RCarter w 6 ,l/84 6/2//84 6/.- 84 6/g,g84 8406270031 840621 PDR ADOCK OS'.)OOg6 F

GjorgiaInstituteofTechnology 50-160/276 cc w/ enclosure (s):

Office of Planning and Budget r Room 6158 270 Washington Street, S. W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30334

~'

.' Mayor of City of Atlanta Atlanta, Georgia 30301

~ ..

. Attorney General Law Department 132 Judicial Building Atlanta, Georgia 30334 1

1 i

i f

i l

t l

l i

i l

I l

i I

l-

{

. . . . - . .