Similar Documents at Fermi |
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217N4261999-10-25025 October 1999 Forwards Amend 17 to License DPR-9 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS by Deleting SR D.3.c,which Required Weekly Observation of Nitrogen Cover Gas Pressure within Sodium Storage Tanks Located in Sodium Building NRC-99-0085, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, IAW 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Without Encl NRC-99-0094, Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed1999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Safeguards Event Rept 99-S01-00 for Reportable Event That Occurred on 990922.Commitments Made by Util Listed ML20217P1661999-10-21021 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-17 on 990927-1005.No Violations Noted ML20217M0771999-10-19019 October 1999 Confirms Discussion Between GL Shear,M Mitchell,E Kosky, D Williams,B Rumins,D Harmon & W Rutenberg in Public Meeting on 990923.Purpose of Meeting Was to Discuss Current Status RP Program at Enrico Fermi 2 ML20217N9231999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 40 ML20217E5671999-10-14014 October 1999 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Already Available in Pdr.App B Records Encl & Being Released in Entirety NRC-99-0087, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons1999-10-12012 October 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-10.Licensee Contests Subject Violation,Due to Listed Reasons NRC-99-0083, Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal1999-10-0707 October 1999 Submits Requested Response to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20217D5331999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 39 ML20217F5931999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-11 on 990724-0908.Two Violations Re Failure to Follow Procedures While Sampling Standby Liquid Control Tank & Wear Dosimetry Properly Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20217B8261999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards Summary of Decommissioning Insp Plan for Fy 2000. Plan Will Be Updated Annually & May Be Revised at Any Time Based Upon Future Insp Findings,Events & Resource Availability ML20212J8121999-10-0101 October 1999 Discusses Plant,Unit 2 Completion of Licensing Action for GL 98-01 & Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Ack Efforts That Licensee Have Completed to Date in Preparing Plant for Y2K Transition ML20212K8881999-09-30030 September 1999 Refers to 990928 Meeting Conducted at Fermi Unit 2 to Discuss Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & PSA Staff ML20217A3261999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 38 NRC-99-0091, Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations1999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards NRC Form 536,in Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML20212J8331999-09-27027 September 1999 Responds to Licensee 990924 Request That NRC Exercise Discretion Not to Enforce Compliance with Actions Required in TS 3/4.6.1.8.Ltr Documents 990923 Telcon with Util in Which NRC Orally Issued NOED ML20216G9791999-09-24024 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 37 NRC-99-0092, Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys1999-09-24024 September 1999 Documents Util Request for Enforcement Discretion with Respect to Requirements of TS 3/4.6.1.8 Re Drywell & Suppression Chamber Purge Sys ML20216H3561999-09-23023 September 1999 Informs That During 990914 Telcon,L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements with NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of 991129 Which Coincides with Util Regularly Scheduled Exam ML20216H4541999-09-23023 September 1999 Informs That During 990914 Telcon L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements for Administration of Licensing Exams at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of Jan 31,2000.NRC Will Make Exam Validation Visit to Facility During Week of Jan 10,2000 ML20212F3241999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 36 NRC-99-0081, Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public1999-09-17017 September 1999 Submits Eight Relief Requests Associated with Containment Inservice Exam Program for Fermi 2 Plant,Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(g)(5)(iv).Requested Relief Does Not Adversely Affect Health & Safety of Public ML20217A9421999-09-0909 September 1999 Informs That NRC Plan to Conduct Addl Resident Insps Beyond Core Insp Program Over Next 6 Months to Assess Improvements in Areas of Procedural Compliance & Quality of Work. Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl NRC-99-0079, Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-09-0808 September 1999 Forwards Rev 15 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev ML20211Q0991999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Rev 35 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0090, Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld1999-09-0303 September 1999 Forwards Proprietary Operator License Renewal Application, NRC Forms 398 & 396 for SW Burt,License SOP-30199-3. Proprietary Encls Withheld NRC-99-0066, Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d)1999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards semi-annual fitness-for-duty Rept for Fermi 2 for Period of 990101-0630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d) ML20211G4951999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards Rev 34 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0055, Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program for Pumps & Valves for Fermi 2 Second 10-Year Interval, Per Provisions of 10CFR50.55a(f)(5)(iv).Rev Includes Four Pump Relief Requests & Ten Valve Relief Requests Requiring NRC Approval IR 05000341/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Discusses Insp Rept 50-341/99-13 & OI Rept 3-98-039 Conducted Into Potential Misconduct of Operator Formerly Employed by De.Nrc Determined That Violation of NRC Regulations Occurred.Synopsis of IO Rept Encl NRC-99-0056, Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation1999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Rev 2,change 0 to ISI-Nondestructive Exam (ISI-NDE) Program (Plan) for Piping,Components & Integral Attachments, for Second ten-year Interval of Fermi 2 Plant Operation ML20211C0521999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Tables for Sections 3.6 & 3.7 of Draft Safety Evaluation of Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS NRC-99-0089, Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev1999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Rev 13 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal Dtd 980403.Rev Provide Update for Remaining Open Issues Associated with NRC Review of ITS Submittal.Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev ML20217E6181999-08-13013 August 1999 FOIA Request for Documents Re Implementing Regulations in 10CFR & Requesting That Region III Task Interface Agreement (TIA) Related to Fermi 2 Plant Be Made Available IR 05000341/19990011999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-01 on 990619-0723 & Nov. Violation of Concern Because Operators Did Not Understand License Requirements & Placed Plant in Configuration Where EDG 11 Was Removed from Service IR 05000341/19990121999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-12 on 990712-0716.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Implementation of Plant Chemistry & Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs & Operation of post-accident Sampling Sys ML20211C4761999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS NRC-99-0057, Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS1999-08-0404 August 1999 Forwards Rev 12 to ITS 980403 Submittal,Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.3,including Changes Associated with NRC Review of Rev 6 ITS ML20210N5451999-08-0303 August 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 33 NRC-99-0077, Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS1999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Rev 11 to Fermi ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403,providing Update to Submittal for ITS Sections 3.5,3.6 & 3.8.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittals of Revs 5,5a & 7 to ITS ML20210J2121999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses NRC OI Investigation Rept 3-98-039 Completed on 990524 & Forwards Notice of Violation NRC-99-0053, Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl1999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Rev 14 to Fermi 2 Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan, Per 10CFR50.54(p)(2).Changes Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Plan.Summary of Changes Also Encl ML20209H7211999-07-14014 July 1999 Forwards Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section), Rev 32 NRC-99-0054, Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal1999-07-13013 July 1999 Forwards Rev 10 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal, , Providing Update to Submittal for ITS Section 3.4,RCS.Update Includes Changes Associated with NRC Review of Util Transmittal of Rev 4 to ITS Submittal ML20209F6571999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-09 on 990516-0618.No Violations Noted.Weak Procedural Guidance,Communications Issues & Configuration Control Weaknessess Were Evident NRC-99-0052, Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions1999-07-0707 July 1999 Forwards Rev 9 to Fermi 2 ITS Submittal,Dtd 980403. Attachment 1 Contains Brief Abstract of Changes Included in Rev.Attachment 2 Contains Revised Pages for Submittal Along with Rev Instructions ML20196J5511999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses GL 92-01,Rev 1,Supp 1, Rv Integrity, Issued by NRC on 950519 & DE Responses & 980729 for Fermi 2.Informs That Staff Revised Info in Rvid & Released Info as Rvid Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20209C6141999-07-0101 July 1999 Rev 31 to Approved UFSAR Lcrs That Have Not Been Incorporated Into UFSAR Hardcopy (Sorted by Section) NRC-99-0076, Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included1999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Rev 8 to ITS Submittal to Provide Update to ITS Submittal for ITS Section 3.7.Brief Abstract of Changes Included 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:NRC TO UTILITY
MONTHYEARML20058D1151990-10-26026 October 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/90-15 on 901009-12.No Violations Noted ML20059H9821990-09-13013 September 1990 Forwards Safeguards Insp 50-341/90-12 on 900827-31.No Violations Noted ML20059L2861990-09-10010 September 1990 Informs That Operator & Senior Operator Written & Operating Exams Scheduled for Wk of 901210.Ref Matls Listed on Encl Should Be Provided at Least 30 Days Prior to Exam ML20059H2421990-09-0707 September 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/90-11 on 900625-0824.No Violations Noted ML20059G4731990-09-0404 September 1990 Discusses 900822 Site Visit to Discuss Proposed Security Measures for Next Scheduled Refueling Outage.Proposed Security Measures Discussed May Require Change to Chapter 7, Per 10CFR50.54(p) or 10CFR50.90 as Applicable ML20059E1581990-08-30030 August 1990 Advises That Util 900425 Response to NRC Bulletin 90-002, Loss of Thermal Margin Caused by Channel Bow, Acceptable ML20059E9291990-08-30030 August 1990 Advises That Util 900126 Response to NRC Bulletin 89-002, Stress Corrosion Cracking of High-Hardness Type-410 Stainless Steel Internal Preloaded Bolting in Anchor/Darling Model S350W Swing Check Valves... Acceptable ML20059B7831990-08-22022 August 1990 Advises That NRC Considers 900724 Application for Amend to License NPF-43 Re Turbine Overspeed Protection Sys Withdrawn ML20059A4111990-08-20020 August 1990 Accepts Util 881003 Response to NRC Bulletin 88-008 & Suppl 1, Thermal Stresses in Piping Connected to Rcss. NRC Recommends That Analysis Prepared in Response to Bulletin & Suppl Be Kept on File for Further Review ML20059A5981990-08-15015 August 1990 Advises That 900724 Rev 15 to Physical Security Plan Consistent W/Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20059A7341990-08-0909 August 1990 Advises That 890721 & 1109 Responses to Generic Ltr 89-08, Erosion/Corrosion Induced Pipe Wall Thinning, Satisfactory ML20059A7611990-08-0909 August 1990 Advises That Response to Bulletin 88-010, Nonconforming Molded-Case Circuit Breakers, Acceptable,Per 890331,0706 & 1106 Ltrs ML20058N8821990-08-0808 August 1990 Advises That 890724 Application for Amend to License NPF-43, Re RCIC Sys Actuation Instrumentation Considered Withdrawn ML20058N8851990-08-0808 August 1990 Advises That 881222 Application for Amend to License NPF-43, Re Isolation Actuation Instrumentation Considered Withdrawn ML20058N8881990-08-0808 August 1990 Advises That 881222 Application for Amend to License NPF-43 Re Control Room Emergency Filtration Sys Considered Withdrawal ML20058M6141990-08-0707 August 1990 Forwards Sample Registration Ltr for 901010 Generic Fundamentals Section of Written Operator Licensing Exam. Registration Ltr Listing Names of Candidates Taking Exam Should Be Submitted to Region 30 Days Prior to Exam Date ML20056A4981990-08-0101 August 1990 Forwards Master Bwr/Pwr Generic Fundamentals Exam Section W/Answer Key.W/O Encls ML20056A6201990-07-31031 July 1990 Advises That Requirements in CAL-RIII-88-09,satisfied & Confirmatory Action Ltr Closed,Per ML20056A4911990-07-30030 July 1990 Confirms Plans for Mgt Meeting on 900821 in Glen Ellyn,Il to Discuss Plant Status,Refueling 2 Planning & Mgt Changes ML20055J3301990-07-28028 July 1990 Ack Receipt of 900309 Response to 900212 Order Modifying License & Notice of Violation from Investigation Repts. Util Corrective Actions Acceptable ML20058L6351990-07-26026 July 1990 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/90-09 on 900514-0706. Violations Re Inadequacies Associated W/Emergency Diesel Generator Surveillance & Process Computer Changes Noted,But Not Cited ML20055G3891990-07-16016 July 1990 Forwards Exam Rept 50-341/OL-90-02 Administered on 900528 & 0601-03 ML20055G3351990-07-11011 July 1990 Agrees w/900614 Ltr Re Commitment Change to Inservice Test Program,Per Violation Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/87-09. Effectiveness of Calibr Program Will Be Monitored to Ensure That Inservice Test Program Reliability Not Jeopardized ML20055D8361990-06-27027 June 1990 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/90-07 on 900331-0525 & Notice of Violation.Failure to Establish Effective Contractor Control & Inability of Operators to Utilize Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Flow Test Mode Discussed ML20055D2831990-06-26026 June 1990 Ack Receipt of 900604 Supplemental Response to NRC Concerns on RHR Operability from Insp Rept 50-341/89-17.Util Now Has Appreciation of Intent of Ltr & NRC Position in 900515 Re Rhr.Issue Considered Closed ML20059M9221990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards NRC Performance Indicators for First Quarter 1990. W/O Encl ML20248G3621989-10-0303 October 1989 Forwards SSOMI Insp Rept 50-341/89-200 on 890717-21 & 0731-0804.Weaknesses Identified,Including Lack of Definitive post-mod Test Criteria for Packages & Failure to Establish Proper Controls for Receipt of Vendor Info ML20248G0111989-09-29029 September 1989 Forwards Synopsis of OI Investigation Into Util Implementation of Facility Licensed Requalification Training Program Under Case 3-87-009.Enforcement Action Associated W/Potential Violation Not Warranted ML20248C3431989-09-28028 September 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/89-21 on 890717-0905.No Violations Noted ML20248C9471989-09-26026 September 1989 Advises That 890908 Rev 4 to Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan Meets Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20248D5181989-09-25025 September 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/89-23 on 890814-18.No Violations Noted ML20247P4331989-09-13013 September 1989 Confirms 890901 Telcon W/Ws Orser to Conduct Presentation on Refueling Outage Issues During 890914 Meeting in Newport,Mi ML20247K0341989-09-0808 September 1989 Summarizes 890831 Meeting W/Util to Discuss Multiple Control Sys Failures Study ML20246L3561989-08-24024 August 1989 Advises That 881018 Amend Request,Deleting Commitment to Complete 100% Audit Coverage of Tech Spec Line Items within Five Yrs,Disapproved.Subj Disapproval Concurred in by NRR & Region III ML20246F1301989-08-24024 August 1989 Forwards Safety Team Insp Rept 50-341/89-20 on 890626-30 & 0720 & Notice of Deviation.Requests Info Re Standby Gas Treatment Sys CO2 Tank Level Gauge Calibr Practices ML20245K1151989-08-14014 August 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/89-18 on 890606-0724.No Violations Noted ML20245H6071989-08-10010 August 1989 Advises That 890801 Rev 14 to Physical Security Plan Meets Provisions of 10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20247R1771989-07-31031 July 1989 Confirms Monthly Meeting on 890815 in Glen Ellyn,Il to Discuss Plant Status,Schedules & NRC Commitments,Per 890726 Telcon ML20247K4521989-07-25025 July 1989 Advises That Citation of Violation 341/88037,re Qualification of Core Spray Piping,Found Inapplicable Against 10CFR50,App B,Criterion III & That Citation Against Criterion Xvi Found Applicable,Per of Denial ML20247J1371989-07-24024 July 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/89-16 on 890531-0602 & 26-29.No Violations Noted ML20246Q2631989-07-14014 July 1989 Forwards NRR Director to Ecological Ctr of Southern California Ack Receipt of Petition & Stating That Petition Being Treated Under 10CFR2.206 ML20247A3501989-07-14014 July 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/89-12 on 890225-0623.No Violations Noted ML20246K4351989-07-11011 July 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/89-11 on 890411-0605 & Notice of Violation.Util Will Be Notified of NRC Decision Re Enforcement Action ML20246E0201989-07-0606 July 1989 Confirms 890712 Meeting in Newport,Mi to Discuss First Refueling Outage at Plant,Per 890705 Discussion.Notice of Significant Licensee Meeting Encl ML20246E7431989-06-28028 June 1989 Advises That Rev 3 to Security Personnel Training & Qualification Plan Transmitted by 890525 & 0616 Ltrs Consistent w/10CFR50.54(p) & Acceptable ML20245L0341989-06-27027 June 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-016/89-01 & 50-341/89-14 on 890522-26.No Violations Noted IR 05000341/19880211989-06-27027 June 1989 Informs of Postponement of Decision Re Whether or Not to Withdraw Violation Noted in Insp Repts 50-341/88-21 & 50-341/86-39.Listed Values for LPCI & Core Spray Sys Requested within 60 Days of Receipt of Ltr ML20245H4021989-06-23023 June 1989 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-341/89-19 on 890613-15.No Violations Noted.Exercise Weakness Discussed ML20245H7261989-06-19019 June 1989 Ack Receipt of Util 890405 Request to Withdraw 881222 Application for Amend to License NPF-43 Re Objective of Maintaining Radioactive Gaseous Releases ALARA ML20244E2941989-06-12012 June 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/89-13 on 890508-12.No Violations Noted 1990-09-07
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217N4261999-10-25025 October 1999 Forwards Amend 17 to License DPR-9 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises TS by Deleting SR D.3.c,which Required Weekly Observation of Nitrogen Cover Gas Pressure within Sodium Storage Tanks Located in Sodium Building ML20217P1661999-10-21021 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-17 on 990927-1005.No Violations Noted ML20217M0771999-10-19019 October 1999 Confirms Discussion Between GL Shear,M Mitchell,E Kosky, D Williams,B Rumins,D Harmon & W Rutenberg in Public Meeting on 990923.Purpose of Meeting Was to Discuss Current Status RP Program at Enrico Fermi 2 ML20217E5671999-10-14014 October 1999 First Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.Records in App a Already Available in Pdr.App B Records Encl & Being Released in Entirety ML20217F5931999-10-0707 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-11 on 990724-0908.Two Violations Re Failure to Follow Procedures While Sampling Standby Liquid Control Tank & Wear Dosimetry Properly Being Treated as Noncited Violations ML20217B8261999-10-0404 October 1999 Forwards Summary of Decommissioning Insp Plan for Fy 2000. Plan Will Be Updated Annually & May Be Revised at Any Time Based Upon Future Insp Findings,Events & Resource Availability ML20212J8121999-10-0101 October 1999 Discusses Plant,Unit 2 Completion of Licensing Action for GL 98-01 & Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Ack Efforts That Licensee Have Completed to Date in Preparing Plant for Y2K Transition ML20212K8881999-09-30030 September 1999 Refers to 990928 Meeting Conducted at Fermi Unit 2 to Discuss Initiatives in Risk Area & to Establish Dialog Between SRAs & PSA Staff ML20212J8331999-09-27027 September 1999 Responds to Licensee 990924 Request That NRC Exercise Discretion Not to Enforce Compliance with Actions Required in TS 3/4.6.1.8.Ltr Documents 990923 Telcon with Util in Which NRC Orally Issued NOED ML20216H4541999-09-23023 September 1999 Informs That During 990914 Telcon L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements for Administration of Licensing Exams at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of Jan 31,2000.NRC Will Make Exam Validation Visit to Facility During Week of Jan 10,2000 ML20216H3561999-09-23023 September 1999 Informs That During 990914 Telcon,L Sanders & M Bielby Made Arrangements with NRC to Inspect Licensed Operator Requalification Program at Fermi Nuclear Station for Week of 991129 Which Coincides with Util Regularly Scheduled Exam ML20217A9421999-09-0909 September 1999 Informs That NRC Plan to Conduct Addl Resident Insps Beyond Core Insp Program Over Next 6 Months to Assess Improvements in Areas of Procedural Compliance & Quality of Work. Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl IR 05000341/19990131999-08-19019 August 1999 Discusses Insp Rept 50-341/99-13 & OI Rept 3-98-039 Conducted Into Potential Misconduct of Operator Formerly Employed by De.Nrc Determined That Violation of NRC Regulations Occurred.Synopsis of IO Rept Encl ML20211C0521999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Tables for Sections 3.6 & 3.7 of Draft Safety Evaluation of Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS IR 05000341/19990011999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-01 on 990619-0723 & Nov. Violation of Concern Because Operators Did Not Understand License Requirements & Placed Plant in Configuration Where EDG 11 Was Removed from Service IR 05000341/19990121999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-12 on 990712-0716.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Implementation of Plant Chemistry & Radiological Environ Monitoring Programs & Operation of post-accident Sampling Sys ML20211C4761999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft Safety Evaluation Re Proposed Conversion of Current TS to Improved Standard TS ML20210J2121999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses NRC OI Investigation Rept 3-98-039 Completed on 990524 & Forwards Notice of Violation ML20209F6571999-07-12012 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-09 on 990516-0618.No Violations Noted.Weak Procedural Guidance,Communications Issues & Configuration Control Weaknessess Were Evident ML20196J5511999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses GL 92-01,Rev 1,Supp 1, Rv Integrity, Issued by NRC on 950519 & DE Responses & 980729 for Fermi 2.Informs That Staff Revised Info in Rvid & Released Info as Rvid Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20209E9991999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-016/99-01 on 990614-17.No Violations Noted.Potential Weakness in Airborne Effluent Concentration Assessment Identified ML20209B2471999-06-29029 June 1999 Informs That NRR Revised Schedule for Conversion of Fermi 2 TS to Improved Std Ts.Planned Amend Date Has Been Moved to 990930 & Date for Draft Amend Has Been Moved to 990806 ML20207E4961999-06-0101 June 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-07 on 990402-0515.One Violation of NRC Requirements Occurred Re Failure to Keep TS Requirements Re Approval of Overtime Deviations.Violations Being Treated as non-cited Violations,Consistent with App C ML20207D3311999-05-26026 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-04 on 990503-07.No Violations Noted.During Insp,Nrc Observation of Licensee Activities Showed Radiological Emergency Response Preparedness Program Maintained in Effective State of Operational Readiness ML20206N7351999-05-14014 May 1999 Forwards RAI Re Plant Response to GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During DBA Conditions ML20206N4621999-05-13013 May 1999 Informs That NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization, Division of Licensing Project Management Created. Reorganization Chart Encl ML20206J9131999-05-10010 May 1999 Forwards SE Finding That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Requested in GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, ML20206Q7041999-05-0606 May 1999 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-341/99-02 on 990308 ML20206G4931999-05-0505 May 1999 Refers to DE 980804 Requests for Relief (PR-8,Rev 2 & PR-12) from IST Requirements of ASME Code for RHR Pumps.Review of Relief Requests Completed.Se Approving Relief Requests Encl ML20206K4031999-04-29029 April 1999 Forwards Partially Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21) Insp Rept 50-341/99-08 on 990405-09.No Violations Noted.Concern Expressed Over NRC Observations of Poor Performance Demonstrated During Some Contingency Response Drills ML20205T3841999-04-23023 April 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-03 on 990218-0401.Two Violations Occurred & Being Treated as non-cited Violations Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20205S8481999-04-20020 April 1999 Informs That Changes in Rev 22 Do Not Decrease Effectiveness of Emergency Plan & Plan Continues to Meet Stds of 10CFR50.47(b) & Requirements of App E to 10CFR50.NRC Approval Is Not Required ML20205Q7001999-04-15015 April 1999 Forwards Amend 16 to License DPR-9,allowing Possession of Nominal Amount of Special Nuclear Matl,In Response to 980717 Application.Related SER & Notice of Issuance Also Encl ML20205P1691999-04-14014 April 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-06 on 990315-19.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Aspects of Radioactive Effluent Monitoring,Liquid Waste Processing,Esf Filtration & CR Habitability & Solid Waste Mgt & Transportation Programs ML20204E4061999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-05 on 990308-11.No Violations Noted.Insp Concluded That Fire Protection Program Was Effective ML20204E0271999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Licensee & Suppl, ,which Requested NRC Approval of Alternative Rv Weld Exam,Per 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) & 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(A)(5), for Plant,Unit 2 for 40-month Period ML20207L7281999-03-0909 March 1999 Informs That Util Ltrs & 981026 Responding to GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits, Completes Licensing Action for Fermi 2 ML20207J1401999-03-0808 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/99-02 on 990111-29 & Notice of Violation.One Violation Identified in Area of Design Control.Violation of Concern Because Errors Existed in Three of Six Calculations Reviewed ML20207G5711999-03-0404 March 1999 Discusses 990301 Meeting Between GL Shear,M Mitchell, D Williams,C Budnik & M Clements Re Current Status of Radiation Protection Program at Facility ML20207E2491999-02-22022 February 1999 Discusses Licensee 980617 Updated Response to GL 96-05 Indicating Intent to Implement Provisions of JOG Program for MOV Periodic Verification for Fermi-2.Forwards RAI Re Fermi-2 Response to GL 96-05 ML20207E6451999-02-22022 February 1999 Submits Correction to Insp Rept 50-341/98-15 Issued on 981207.Rept Incorrectly Documented That Loose Internal Sleeving on Turbine Control Valve Caused Power Oscillations Greater than 10% During Plant Operation ML20203F6761999-02-11011 February 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved Standard Ts,Section 3.6 for Fermi 2 ML20203F2541999-02-10010 February 1999 Informs That Beginning 990216,DE Hills Will Be Chief of Operations Branch Which Includes Operator Licensing Function ML20203F6911999-02-10010 February 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for Bulletin 96-03, Potential Plugging of Emergency Core Cooling Suction Strainers by Debris in Boiling-Water Reactors, ML20203G6411999-02-0808 February 1999 Informs of Receipt of Encl FEMA Correspondence Received 990119,transmitting FEMA Final Exercise Rept for 980608 Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise at Enrico Fermi II Npp.No Deficiencies Were Identified During Exercise ML20202H8881999-02-0404 February 1999 Clarifies Intent of RAI Re Plant Staff Qualifications & Reg Guide 1.8,Rev 2, Qualification & Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants, Dtd Apr 1987.Staff Position on Issue Neither New Nor Different Position from Previous Position ML20202H6111999-01-25025 January 1999 Requests Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved Std Tss, Section 3.5 for Fermi 2 ML20206S1111999-01-21021 January 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-341/98-19 on 981110-990104.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Noted Potential Trend Re Documented Operability Assessments That May Not Have Been Performed for C/A Resolution Documents ML20199G7561999-01-14014 January 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Conversion to Improved Stds Tss,Section 3.3 for Plant ML20198S3101999-01-0606 January 1999 Forwards Amend 15 to License DPR-9,consisting of Changes to TS in Response to 980128 Application.Related SER & Notice of Issuance,Also Encl 1999-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
p ,
a< -.. - ,% s
-s, p G- ,
,s
m ,
SEP 101990 w,
! Docket'No. 50-341 The' Detroit Edison Comprv.
ATTH:
W. ' S.s 0rser -
Senior Vice President Nuclear. Generation 2
6400 North Dixie Highpay
. Newport, MI 48166' Gentlemen:
SUBJECT:
OPERATOR AND SENIOR OPERATOR LICENSING EXAMINATIONS In a telepiione' conversation between Mr. J. Hammer and Mr. B. Trimai arrangements r were made.for the administration of licensing, examinations at the Fermi 2
. Nuclear Power' Plant .;
- The written)and operating examinations are scheduled for the week'of W December 10, 1990 .
In crder for us to meet this schedule, it will be necessary for the1 facility to furnish the~ approved reference material listed-in Enclosure 1, " Reference Materia: Requirements for Reactor / Senior Reactor' Operator Licensing Examinations" at least 60 days prior to the examination date.1 Any1 substandard or incomplete material.or delay i_n receiving approved properly bound and indexeu reference raterial may result in a delay in administering the examinations. Mr. Trimai
~has been advised of our reference material requirements, the number of reference material sets that er. required, and the examiners names and addresses where-each set is'to be mailed.
- The facility management is responsible for providingr adequate space andi Laccommodations in _ order to properly conduct the written examinations.
Enclosure 2, "Requiremects for Administration of Written Examinations,"
describes our requiremer ts for conducting these examinations. Mr. Trimai-has also been informed of t'iese requirements.
Enclosure 3 contains tne Rules and Guidelines that.will be in effect during the administration of the written examination. The facility management is m >
respoisible'for ensuring that all applicants bre aware of these rules.
m The f acility staff review of the written examination will be conducted in accordance with requirements specified in Enclosure 4, " Requirements for Facility Review of Written Examinations." Mr. Trimai has been informed of m these requirements.
m v
i; nn~GJ U j 9009260233 900910 ,
PDR ADOCK OSOOO34 h< m y PNtl p L
W6 c,x mgc ; * '
+
h,j Wg,y~
m eq --
j 1 3
- .Et M P iTh'e Detroit Ed_ison" Company SEP 101990~ ;
12:
y7 V - .. .. . >
t To>better document / simulator examinations, tne' Chief Examiner will have'the, ;
- facility simulator operator record predetermined plant conditior: (i.e., plant q y 3" '
pressure, temperature; pressurizer level, etc;), for each simJlator' scenario, s
1 EThe applifants will be responsible for providing this-information with any- .
W . appeal:ofii simulator operating examination. Therefore, the feility: training
! staff /should' retain the simulator examination scenario information unti1~all 4 applice 'ts-who took the' examination's have either passed the operaMng examination.,
p accepted the denial of their 1_icense,for filed an appeal.-
% '~
- Preliminary reactor. operator and -senior reactor operator _ license gpiications- ,
- shouldLbe submitted at least 30 days before the' first examination dates so 9 k' >
< ithattwe will-be able to review the training and experience of the candidates, M"' process:the medical. certifications, and prepare final examiner assignments; i 1af ter applicant eligibility has been' determined. If the applications are not. 4 received at least 30 days beforelthe examination dates, it is 1lkely that a , '
postporlement will be necessary. Final signed applications certifying thattall: 'l training,has been completed shall be submitted at least 14- days _before the _.
y Lfirst examination date. However, if processing of a: license application is- <
e' not. completed in' time to make a determination of appluant eligibility, the:
N K_* candidate shall not be; permitted:to sit for the examination. Therefore, it:is :
-recommended that license applications be provided as soon.as possible to ensure '!
4n- ,
an appropriate level.of-review.- ,
d ,; 'This> request-is covered by Office of Management and Budget Clearance Number 3150-0101- d j,, which expires May 31, 1992. The estimated average burden _is 7.7 hours8.101852e-5 days <br />0.00194 hours <br />1.157407e-5 weeks <br />2.6635e-6 months <br />.per }
wJ -
response, including gathering, xeroxing and mailingithe: required material. A Q' Send: comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this Mco11ection ofLinformatton, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to f'
.the' Records and Reports Management Branch,1 Division of~Information Support y
Services, Office-of Inforreation Resources Management, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 1 i Commission : Washington,~ D.C. 20555; and to the. Paperwork Reduction Project- .i Z _(315010101}, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, D.C. 20503.~ >
t 4+
4j Thank 'you for'your consideration in this matter. If, you have any E{
- questions regarding the examination procedures.and requirements, please is contact either Mr. J.Jiammer at 708/790-5600 or Mr. M. Bielby at 708/790-5586. q m- Sincerely, '
i; ,
ORIGIML SIGNED BY GEOFyREY C. WRIGH Geoffrey C. Wright, Chief !
J* s ,
Operations Branch j
,8' :See-Attached for Enclosures ,
dud Distribution I Rill RIII hight
'/l5/ 90 T lammer/jk: Jordar I
_6 y
109/05/90~ 09/d /90 .09/7/90 ;
$4f. .
}&' ,
O' \
- m. o '
NF '
q yW n _,
!s(( tk. k ,
- M W $W '
pp:Wy '
n '
, <- x s , i <
yyn y -
4 -
i b; .4" , ,
ipO ' 5The Detroit l (Edisonicompany - 3; - SEP.10:1990 4 ,
ye ..
f~ ,;:p g:,_I
' ,a: .u.
4 J'1' ,r
^im .
Enclosures ~and Distributioni
' ~
Enclosures:
A, (1. . Reference Material Requirements' foriReactor/SeniorReactor,.0perator- >
Licensing Examinations...
g .,
2..-Requirements.for.AdministrationD t*: of: Written; Examinations'-
- .3.'.-NRC Rules ~and-Guidelines ^For '
- Written Examinations 04.i Requirements for Facility Review nu , 7of Aritten Examinations T \1 W "' cc w/ enclosures
- .,
.D. RAGipson,-Assistant Vice President;& Manager: Nuclear-
.- . Production?
p " Patricia ~ Anthony, d_ censing '
$ .J sP. =A. -Marquardt,o Corporate b Legal Department
,w f E. ' Preston,L Jr. , . Plant ' '
m 'Trainin , ci 7DCD/DCB(g; RIDSb Manager 4 1
, it
, : 0C/LFDCB im -Resident Insp'ector, RIII ..
. -- F p :F ^ James'R. Padgettu Michigan Public "V: '
1 Service 'Comission ' -
E* ? Harry H;- VoighteEsqi .
- & m . : Michigar[ Department cf .F
- 'Public Healthi j$ g1 ; Monroe' County Office of- 4
, Civil Preperedness- '
Fermi, LPM.- NRR4 ,
y '
b, l cc w/o enclosures:
LD. J. Lange,;0LB,:NRR- . s ,!
/,, - R. DeFayette( DRP,(RIII - f.
y
{
t l
>t 6 i 4 ..:' f 3
W qt '(p s
'i .
5f i
~f A j o
i\
n'b t , ;r w _
p -
h&m+
cy< e 4
s ,
/ *l ik ENCLOSURE 1~
g' . .
'l 6 ~
REFERENCE MATERI AL REQUIREMENTS FOR RL,cTOR/ SENIOR REACTOR ' .:
E' OPERATOR LICENSINdTUNINATIONS
- t
-l '. Existingilearningobjectives..JobPerformanceMeasuresandlessonplans (includin( training manuals, plant orientation manual,-system .
g ' descriptions,: reactor theory, thermodynamics, .etc.). +
y e
A copy of the~ facility Job and< Task Analysis (JTA), specifying th'e knowledges and abilities required of an operator, at the f acility. . Each particular' knowledge and/or ability will; include an importance rating
.g ..corre al ting it to ensuring the health and the safety of the public. If.
a JTA is not furnished, the Knowledges and Abilities Catalog for Nuclear l Power Plant 0perators, NUREG-1122 (1123) will be used to establish :!
content validity for the examination.
t ,
AllJobPerformanceMeasures(JPMs)usedtoascertainthe' competence,of> l
, the operators-in performing tasks- within the- control room _ complex and, as identified inlthe facility JTAs, outside of the control room, i.e.,;1ocal operations.
-. Training materials'should include all. substantive' written material used "!
ifor preparing applicants for initial R0 and SR0' licensing. The written material should4 include learning objectives and the details ~ presented
'during lectures, rather than outlines.; Training materials.should bei ,
4
-identified by plant and unit; bound, andtindexedn FAILURE T0 PROVIDE- -
COMPLETE, PROPERLY BOUND AND ' INDEXED: PLANT REFERENCE MATERIAL MAY RESULT ..
, lH THE RETURN OF THE MATERIAL'TO THE PERSON WHO IS THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF- ,
-CORPORATE-MANAGEMENTWHOISRESPONSIBLEFORPLANTOPERATIONS(E.G.,VICE:
PRESIDENT OF-HUCLEAR 0FERATIONS). ACCOMPANYING THE MATERIAL WILL BE A1
-C0VER LETTER EXPLAINING THE DEFICIENCIES'IN THE REFERENCE MATERIAL AND THE FACT THAT THIS WAS THELREASON THE EXAMINATIONS WERE CANCELLED OR
. POSTPONED > Training: materials which include the following should be. E prov,ided: ')
System descriptions including' descriptions of all operationally
. relevant flow paths,, components, controls and instrumentation.
L..
System training material should draw parallels to the actual procedures used for operating._the applicable system. .
s Complete and operationally useful descriptions of all_ safety-system' -
~ interactions and, where available, B0P system interactions.under
,' c emergency and _ abnormal- conciitions, including consequences of .
anticipated: operator error, maintenance error, and equipment failure.
s
> Training material .used to clarify and strengthen understanding ~ of f- emergency. operating procedures, e
l:
l
?
it et , - , a
..e 3 ,.
> Enclosure 1 2 2.1 Complete Procedure Index (including surveillance procedures, etc.).
- 3. Ail administrative procedures (as applicable to reactor operation or saf ety) .
- 4. All integrated plant procedures (normal or general operating procedures).
5.. All emergency procedures (emergency ' instructions, abnormal or special procedures).
-6. Standing orders (important orders that are safety-related and may l supersede the regular procedures)'.
- 7. Surveillance procedures (procedures that are run frequently, i.e.,;seekly_
or that can be run on the simulator). ..
- 8. Fuel-handling and core-loading procedures, (initial core-loading .
procedure,when' appropriate)
- 9. 'All annunciator / alarm procedures.
- \
- 10. Radiation protection manual (radiation control manual or procedures).
- 11. Emergency plan implementing procedures.
- 12. Technical Specifications (and interpretations, if available) for all .
units for which licenses are sought. '
- 13. System operating procedures, i
' Piping.and instrumentation diagrams, electrical single-line diagrams,
- . =14.
or. flow diagrams.
1
- 15. ' Technical Data Book, and/or plant curve information as used by operators !
and facility precautions, limitations, and set points (PLS) for the f acili ty.
'16. Questions and answers: specific to the facility training program which.may be used in the written or' operating examinations (voluntary by facility -h licensee).
T 17. The following on the' plant reference simulation facility.
- a. List of all preprogranned initial conditions, b.. List of all preset malfunctions with a clear identification number. i The. list should include cause and effect information. Specifically, for each malfunction a concise description of the expected result, ;
or range of results, that will occur upon implementation should be '
provided. Additionally, an indication of which annunciators are to be initially expected should be given.
b
pyh '
~
^ ~
' ?
fM W
.y: ' ; ,
2 -
9 x y
- 3 a .
, f i' . - .. .
M,g 7 e ,.
~ Enclosure IL 31 -. -
T Lt
[.;"
h M- -c.: 'A description of simulator failure capabilities,for valves, i :-breakers,? indicators and alarms.
!? . .
-d.- ' Where the.. capability- exists, an explanation of;the ' ability to vary
.y z .the' severity of a particular.. malfunction shall be provided..i;e.,
71 , ability to vary the size of4 a givenL LOCA or steam leak, or the W > , ability to cause a slow failure of a. component such as a feed pump, f -turbine. generator or ma or valve:(e.g., drifting: shut of:a main
- feedwater control valve ..
E' iW
? Le. . An identification of modeling conditions / problems that may impact-the examination.- y q
Identificatio'n of any known performance 1 test discrepancies not yet.
f.
- v. corrected.-
y.
E
- g. 5 Identification of, differences between the simulator and:the' y- reference plant!s control room.
o Lh;- Copies of facility generated scenarios that' expose the applicantsito
- situationsiof degraded pressure!ccntrol (PWR),' degraded heat removal
" capability (PWR.and= BWR) and containment challenges (PWR and;BWR) may be provided (voluntary by licensee).
s f' i. . Simulator-instructors manual (voluntary by licensee).
- j. Description 'of the; scenarios used for the crainin3 class (voluntary -
by; licensee).- .
~
Ne '
18'.1 _ Additional; material required by the examiners tel evelop cn minations t _thatmeetatherequirementsof,these'Standardsandthe'regulatgns.
'The'abOve reference material'shallebe approved, finaltissues and shall be so: m W" .
marked, . If a plant has not finalized some of the material,'the Chief Evaainer.
shall' verify with the facility that the most complete, up-to-date material is-available.and.-that agreement has been reached with1the licensee for'. limiting-changes before the administ' ration:of the examination. All. procedures andi 4 i Jerence material'shall be bound.with appropriate; indices or tables of- .
con ents so that they can be used efficiently. Failure to provide complete, s ';
- proptr1y bound and indexed plant l reference material could result in- :!
uy cance lation or rescheduling of the: examinations.
g
}l, g ,
Q: 'f ll y /
?!
y, e ,l l ..{
gg
,- ,yc >
- jjj 1' y * * ,
l
> jy' ,
T ,
5 N
(? , ~
O*
i - ..
W ' '
{ " ENCLOSURE 2: ' '[
~
'. l . REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATION OF WRITTEN EXAMINATI'ONS
-5.. ..
6-
- 1. . A single room shall be provided for administration of the written.examina-L i tion. Theslocation'ofithis room and supporting restroom facilities shall .+.
.be such as to-prevent-contact with all other-facility!and/or'~ contractor- :
personnel during the written examination. If necessary, the facility .
j should make arrangement for the use of c suitable room at a local school, f, motel,:or-other building. ' Obtaining this rocia is the responsibility. of
< the licensee. -
7
.2. -Minimum-spacing is required.to ensure examination integrity'as determined: -
Lby the Chief. Examiner.; Minimum spacing should be one applicant-per -
table, with-a three-foot' space between tables.
t3. Suitable arrangementsahall be made by the facility if the applicantsLare; to have lunch, coffee or other refreshments. These errangements shall ccmply with Item 1 above and shall be reviewed by,the ~ examiner-and/or. s proctor.
_ , .m
' ' ~"
-The:facilitylicenseeshallprovidepadsof8-1/2bfilinchlineilpaper
~
4.- - '!
in; unopened packages.for each applicant's use in completing the i examination. .The examiner shall distribute these pads to the-applicants -f as needed. ': P
- 5.
- Applicants may bring pens, pencils,. calculators or slide rules into the examination._ room 0nly? black ink or dark pencils should be used for; writing.' answers tt questions.
f J6. The111censee shall provide one set of . steam -tables .for each, applicant.: ,
The sxaminer shall distribute the steam-tables to the o~pplicants..:No
- twallschartsf models, and/orlother training materials shall be present in. ;
the examination room. No other equipment or: reference' materiul shall; be'
~ .
aliowed unless'provided by the examiner. S 1.7.- :The facility staff shall;be provided with a copy of the written m examination and answer key'after.the last candidate has handed in his cwritten examination. . The facility -staff shall have five working days to
- provide formal;writtenjcomments with supporting documentation regarding written examination 1 questions'and answers to-the Chief Examiner.
p >
3 i t >
7 a.
/
i 1 j
yp.m W w .a.
j
,r e ,
- .y W.
p ,
,[ ~ ^
.. N, -
" ,, y _
i
.-[; i
[ g i ENC'LOSURE-3 q
. W IPROCE'DURESFOR'THEADMINISTRATIONOFWRITTENEXAMINATIONS 1 p ,
. :Y j 1.> . Check identification badges.- .
~'
- 2. Pass out- examinations and' all h'andouts. , Remind ~ applicants not' to review ;
examination:until instructed to do so, e
f -
READ THE FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS VERBATIM:
'l
^
'During the' administration of this examination the following rules apply:
-- i
- 1. . Cheating'on_the examination means an automatic' denial'of your application' Jand could-result insmore setera penalties. a a
% 2. Af ter the examination h'as been completed, you muG sign. the statement :
on the: cove r shee,t indicating that the work.is your own and you have not. ,
received or give'n assistance in completing the examination. 'This must l
- be done"after you= complete the examination. ,
I READ THE..FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS:
- Restroom trips'are to be limited and only one applicant'at a time may 1.
. leave.1You must avoid all ~ contacts with anyone outside the.' examination
~
room'to dvoid even the appearance or possibility of cheating.; '
- 2. Use black ink or dark pencil' only to . facilitate legible reproductions. ,
. :i y 3., ; Print your' name in the' blank provided in the upper right-hand corner of. ;
'the4 examination cover sheet and each answer sheet.
4; Mark your answers on the. answer sheet provided. USE ONLY.THE PAPER:
1PROVIDED AND 00 NOT WRITE;0N.THE BACV SIDE OF THE PAGE.
. 5.- ~ . Before you turn in your _examinat'on, consecutively number each answer a sheet. l
~6. ' - Use' abbreviations only if they are commonly used in facility. literature.
- Avoid using symbols such as 6 or % signs to ' avoid a simple-transposition ;
error-resulting in an incorrect answer. Write it out.
1
.7. -The point valuelfor each question is indicated in [ brackets] after the l question.
L8. Show all calculations, methods, or assumptions used to obtain an answer
< - .to any-short answer questions. ;
- 9. - Partial-credit lmay be given. Therefore, ANSWER ALL PARTS OF THE. QUESTION
- AND DO NOT LEAVE ANY< ANSWER BLANK. Partial credit will NOT be given on
. multiple choice questions.-
.H
,.mo. 4 4 1
we rec , sg ss - ,
"i
+
,m .
/lq t @,;.t ', ,
44 ~ ,
c 4- , t6>W <
p .
Sn ' ' .
ip 2 Enclosure)3; .2 n .. -
W F
10 '- Proportionali grading will; be applied. - Any: additional' wrong information
' ' ' that is. provided' may count against you. For example, if'a question:is y ' D, worthLone-point and..asksLfor four responses, each of,which' is worth!
F- LO.25_pointsCand you give five responses, each'of'youriresponses will be.
01He' 'iworth 0.20 points. If one of your five? responses isLincorrect, 0.20 will p' .ee ' deducted and your.--total, credit for that_ question will be 0.80 instead'
= of- l.FJ even' though you got the f our correct answers':
11.:- . lf Lthe intent;of a! question- is unclear, ask_ questionsL oflthe examiner.
'only.
- ^' -12._ 'When turning inlyour examination, 'ssemble a the completed examination with examination questions, examination aids and answer sheets. in additioni_
turn in all. scrap paper, e 13. Ensure all ;information you wish to _have evaluated as part of _your answer -
lis on;your answer sheet. Scrap paper wilt be; disposed of immediately g
- following-the examination.. .
~
14..cTofpass the? examination, you must achieve a grade of"80% or greater. '
g d
E 15...There"is a time' limit of four (4) hours for completion of the examination.; ,
j d'
- 16. EWhen you are-done and have turned in your examination, leave the-6 , ~ ? examination area (DEFINE THE- AREA). .lf- you are found in this area--
3 '
. while2 the' examination is stil1 ~ in -progress,)your license may. be -
denied or revoked.
E _
t e
a i
q l
( 4 i
f i
i l
t b
__ s }
g*[
w y; , a. ., g g
,g. eq i.
Q' i
w <
s_
' ~
I ENCLOSURE 4 i n
-E . REQUIREMENTS FOR FACILITY REVIEW: 0F WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS ' j
- s
- 1. ( At:thel optio.n ;of. the- Section Chief, the facility may review the~' written u ,
Lexaminat_.ioncup to two weeks prior to its administration.- This, review may_ < q
.take place at the facility _or in-the Regional office. The Chief Examiner _,
will coordinate the details ~ of! the review with the facility. - An NRC: o examiner will always be present during.the rev + .:
y 3 Whenever this option of examination review is utilized, the facility. l
- reviewers <will sign the following statement prior to.being allowed access to the; examination. -The examination or written notes will NOT be
. retained by. the f acility. ,
- ; a. Pre-Examination Security Agreement I
( l acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge concerning_ the examination scheduled for at- as of the date of my signature below.- I agree.-
- tha't I will; not knowingly divulge. any .information concerning this-examination to ?ny unauthorized persons. I' understand.that.I am not. y to participate _in any instruction involving those applicants scheduled r i
,toLbe administered the above examination from'this date until aftert the examination has'been administered. I further understand that-violation of tha' conditions of this agreement may result inithe: i examination being cancelled and/or enforcement action against'myself4 n or'the facility licensee by whom I am employed or represent.-
t'
+
Signature /Date- q In addition, the f acility. staff _ reviewers will sign the:fol_ lowing :"
statement af ter the written examination has been administered. ;j
- b. : Post-Examination Security Agreement.
L I didinot, to the:best- of; my knowledge, divulge-any information concerning the examinations' administered during. the to,any week of at.
unauthorized persons. I did not participate in providing'any. ,
instruction to those applicants who were administered the examination-from- the date 1 entered into this- security ' agreement until the i
. completion of examination administration. ,;
Signature /Date 9
9 _ .
Qf;% -
. O fikf}.[m J.
?
W,g m o
4
,'a# , f!
k y ~ Ehclosure1 - 2. y am I
4 1
[ ,
2ir Regardless.of;whether the above examination: review' option'is exercised 1 tinuediately: following the-administration of. 'the written examination,. the .
j
~
ys ,
facilityf staff- shall be provided a marked-up copy of the examination and, , 1 D thenanswerikey.'y The copy of.the written examination shall include. pen g Land; ink changes made..to' questions during the! examination administration.-
p ,
p If the. facility 1did not review:the examination prior to its administration,. :I Ll they will have five :(5) working days from the day, of the written : . -i
' examination to submit formal comments. If the f acility _ reviewed the .
~
V examination prior'to its. administration, any additional comments must be i y '
given to'an examiner prior to his/her leaving the site at the end of thet +
week of the writtenLexamination administration, in eiti'er case, the! 1
.connents will.be addresse'd to the responsible Regiona10ffice by the . -+
, : highest onsite level of corporate management for: plant operations, e.g., '
Vice President-for Nuclear Operations. A copy of the submittal wil1<be.', 4 forwarded to the Chief Examiner, as appropriate. . Comments lnot' submitted ;
.e .within the required-time: frame will be considered for inclusion in the ,
! grading? procession a.. case-by-case basis byithe Regional Office Section '
' Chief. LShould the' connent submittal deadline not be met, a long delay ?
-in grading.the examinations may occur.
32 LTheifollowing format:should-befadhered to for submittal of'specifici d comments:
j ld. l.isting of NRC: Question, answer and reference ,
-b.= Facility comment /reconnendatio'n 7..
c.; Reference (to. support facility comment).
, ,i NOTES: U No change to.the examination will.be made without submittal of 1
-a reference to support the facility comment. Any supporting ?
, ' documentation: that was not previously. supplied, should_ be j 4 provided, q
- 2. Comments made without e concise facility reconnendation will ;
^ '
y not be addressed. 'I
-n
'A:two-hourcpost examination review may be held at the discretion of the. 9
( , 1 4; 1 f'^, Chief Examiner. If <this review is held,.the facility staff should-be (
4 ,
iinformed that only written connents- that are properly supported will be t
- 13. '1 considered inithe q'rading of the examination.
\
j u
.1