ML20212H366

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:42, 21 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-315/87-06 & 50-316/87-06 on 870209-11.No Violation Noted.Emergency Preparedness Exercise Weaknesses Noted
ML20212H366
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 02/27/1987
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Dolan J
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
Shared Package
ML20212H370 List:
References
NUDOCS 8703060084
Download: ML20212H366 (3)


See also: IR 05000315/1987006

Text

( g

'

.

FEB 2 71987.

Docket No. 50-315

Docket No. 50-316

American Electric Power Service

Corporation

Indiana and Michigan Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. John E. Dolan

Vice Chairman

Engineering and Construction

1 Riverside Plaza

Columbus, OH 43216

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. J. Foster and

others of this office on February 9-11, 1987 of activities at the Donald C. Cook

Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 authorized by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-58 and

No. DPR-74 and to the discussion of our findings with Messrs M. P. Alexich,

W. G. Smith and others of your staff at the conclusion of the ' inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection re) ort identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, tie inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this

inspection. However, weaknesses were identified which will need corrective

action by your staff. These weaknesses are summarized in the attached Appendix

to this letter. As required by 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E, IV.F, any weaknesses

! that are identified must be corrected. AccordIngly,pleaseadviseuswithin

L 45 days of the date of this letter of the corrective action you have taken or

l plan to take, showing the estimated date of completion with regard to these

exercise weaknesses.

l In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy

l of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to t.lis letter will be

l placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

l

, 8703060084 870227

PDR

'

G

ADOCK 05000315 /

ppg

I \

t

. - . .

F

'

..

.American Electric-Power Service 2

-Corporation FEB 2 71987.

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

"Origintil d.m d by U.D. S6 ter"

W. D. Shafer, Chief

Emergency Preparedness and

Radiological Protection Branch

Enclosures:

1. Exercise Weakness

2. Inspection Reports

No 50-315/87006(DRSS); and

No. 50-316/87006(DRSS)

cc w/ enclosure:

W. G. Smith, Jr. , Plant Manager

DCS/RSB(RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Ronald Callen, Michigan

Public Service Commission

EIS Coordinator, USEPA

Region 5 Office

Nuclear Facilities and

Environmental Monitoring

Section

W. Weaver, FEMA, RI

D.11atthews, OIE, EPB '

f

R RIII RIII rig

ter/lms

ga

Willi msen

mcs

br;; ::

~k

gess

i

Stk

yg g 6 917 [37

-

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _

1

o-

,;

EXERCISE WEAKNESS

Due to the short time -interval between notifications to the State,

PMP 2081 EPP.305, Attachment 2, " Protective Action Recommendation Worksheet"

could.not be completed with the attention it deserved nor is there time for

recalculation to verify the accuracy of the initial calculations. During the

exercise, incorrect-calculations were made on the-form completed at 2045 hours0.0237 days <br />0.568 hours <br />0.00338 weeks <br />7.781225e-4 months <br />,

resulting in a ten Rem error for the two mile thyroid dose estimate. In

addition, this form was virtually unreadable. The delay in completing

-calculations using this form left little or no time for discussion of the

PARS. Rather, the results were given to the E0F/ Recovery Manager and were

then transmitted to the State, without adequate discussion of PARS with

respect to plant conditions, forecast meteorology, etc (0 pen Item 315/87006-01;

316/87006-_01) (Section 5.e).