ML20212H366
| ML20212H366 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 02/27/1987 |
| From: | Shafer W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Dolan J AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE CORP., INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212H370 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8703060084 | |
| Download: ML20212H366 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000315/1987006
Text
(
g
'
.
FEB 2 71987.
Docket No. 50-315
Docket No. 50-316
American Electric Power Service
Corporation
Indiana and Michigan Electric Company
ATTN: Mr. John E. Dolan
Vice Chairman
Engineering and Construction
1 Riverside Plaza
Columbus, OH 43216
Gentlemen:
This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. J. Foster and
others of this office on February 9-11, 1987 of activities at the Donald C. Cook
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 authorized by NRC Operating Licenses No. DPR-58 and
No. DPR-74 and to the discussion of our findings with Messrs M. P. Alexich,
W. G. Smith and others of your staff at the conclusion of the ' inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection re) ort identifies areas examined during
the inspection. Within these areas, tie inspection consisted of a selective
examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and
interviews with personnel.
No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this
inspection.
However, weaknesses were identified which will need corrective
action by your staff.
These weaknesses are summarized in the attached Appendix
to this letter.
As required by 10 CFR Part 50 Appendix E, IV.F, any weaknesses
!
that are identified must be corrected.
AccordIngly,pleaseadviseuswithin
45 days of the date of this letter of the corrective action you have taken or
L
l
plan to take, showing the estimated date of completion with regard to these
exercise weaknesses.
l
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy
l
of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to t.lis letter will be
l
placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
l
8703060084 870227
,
ADOCK 05000315
/
'
G
ppg
I \\
t
.
-
.
.
.
.
- . . .
.-
F
'
..
.American Electric-Power Service
2
FEB 2 71987.
-Corporation
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
"Origintil d.m d by U.D. S6 ter"
W. D. Shafer, Chief
Radiological Protection Branch
Enclosures:
1.
Exercise Weakness
2.
Inspection Reports
No 50-315/87006(DRSS); and
No. 50-316/87006(DRSS)
cc w/ enclosure:
W. G. Smith, Jr. , Plant Manager
DCS/RSB(RIDS)
Licensing Fee Management Branch
Resident Inspector, RIII
Ronald Callen, Michigan
Public Service Commission
EIS Coordinator, USEPA
Region 5 Office
Nuclear Facilities and
Environmental Monitoring
Section
W. Weaver, FEMA, RI
D.11atthews, OIE, EPB '
f
~k
rig
R
RIII
RIII
i
ga
mcs
ter/lms
Willi msen
br;; ::
gess
Stk
6
917 [37
yg
g
-
-
.-
_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
1
o-
- ,;
EXERCISE WEAKNESS
Due to the short time -interval between notifications to the State,
PMP 2081 EPP.305, Attachment 2, " Protective Action Recommendation Worksheet"
could.not be completed with the attention it deserved nor is there time for
recalculation to verify the accuracy of the initial calculations.
During the
exercise, incorrect-calculations were made on the-form completed at 2045 hours0.0237 days <br />0.568 hours <br />0.00338 weeks <br />7.781225e-4 months <br />,
resulting in a ten Rem error for the two mile thyroid dose estimate.
In
addition, this form was virtually unreadable.
The delay in completing
-calculations using this form left little or no time for discussion of the
PARS.
Rather, the results were given to the E0F/ Recovery Manager and were
then transmitted to the State, without adequate discussion of PARS with
respect to plant conditions, forecast meteorology, etc (0 pen Item 315/87006-01;
316/87006-_01) (Section 5.e).