ML20084L660

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:43, 17 April 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits List of Issues Identified by Applicant as Matters of Concern or Unresolved QA Issues in ASLB Initial Decision. Prehearing Conference Should Be Held as Soon as Possible. Related Correspondence
ML20084L660
Person / Time
Site: Byron  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/1984
From: Mark Miller
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
To: Cole R, Alicia Dixon, Smith I
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
OL, NUDOCS 8405140577
Download: ML20084L660 (2)


Text

._

ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE .u _d~. CNDENCE REL/U LU w<o.

coussaoas ari.4w THREE FIR $T NATIONAL PtAZA Ca*CAGO ituNOs5ecear I

  • wAs ,hGTON OmCE 18'2 'e02 EDWARD S iS**AW

' %g'+ED "'" Co""'fac y,'g5 *

  • EtE'GTe'Aff EE WASMihGTON D C 29CM May 9, 1984 Ivan W. Smith, Chairman Dr. ch CNN3han Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Unig" 'Catbideforporation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Com- P. 0. B5 fi gSEW, mission Oak Ridg 7 Te'nnessee 37830 Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. Richard F. Cole J

(

Administrative Judge CCC";T'"!I W g ,. * ****

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Fa00 & UT!L IC-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Re: In the matter of Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2)

Docket Nos. STN 50-354 OL and STN 50-455 OL

Dear Administrative Judges:

In accordance with our telephone conference call today, the following is a list of issues which Commonwealth Edison Company has identified as matters of concern or un-resolved quality assurance issues in the Licensing Board's initial decision. By setting forth this list we do not advocate that any or all of these issues be litigated in the remanded hearing. We call them to the attention of the Licensing Board so that it may make the determination described in footnote 72 of ALAB-770 (slip op. page 35).

1. Staff acceptance of the reinspection program.
2. The basis for determination of inaccessible and non-recreatable inspection attributes in the reinspection program.
3. Relationship of deficiencies identified during the reinspection program to a trend analysis.

8405140577 840509 PDR ADOCK 05000454 bb

9 Administrative Judges

, May 9, 1984 Page 2

4. The number of Hatfield inspectors requiring recertification:

and retraining at the inception of the recertification program.  !

5. Hunter documentation practices regarding discrepant conditions identified during the reinspection program.
6. Further evidence regarding possible fraudulent practices by contractors in the certification of quality control and quality assurance personnel.
7. The disposition of allegations open as of August 10, 1983. ,.
8. Commonwealth Edison Company's general control of its site contractors.
9. Supplemental evidence regarding Hunter " tabling" practices and any pattern of nonconformances by Hatfield.

It is my understanding that Ms. Whicher will provide <

intervenors' list of potential additional issues to be ad-dressed at the remanded hearings by May 17, 1984 and that the Board is available for a prehearing conference during the week .

of May 21. Applicant submits that such a prehearing conference i should be held as soon as possible.

Very truly yours, MIM:es

// 2.ta' n Michael I. Miller One of the Attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company i cc Service List [

{

v v

1 L

a I

_- - - __ _ . .-- - . - - . -