ML20080L121
| ML20080L121 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1984 |
| From: | Mark Miller COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | Gotchy R, Kohl C, Rosenthal A NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP) |
| References | |
| ALAB-143, NUDOCS 8402160251 | |
| Download: ML20080L121 (5) | |
Text
o a
- o ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE
'O COUNSELORS AT LAW TM488 Fi#$t h4TIO8aAL PLAI A c iC.Go
'84 FE 15 NO:16 TELt%E 3 2 SM 7900 IE."O'$E., E%
waSwweGTON OFf:Ct
"C " ? f,f,'f '"' "
- wtLim G St Att leu 1W3 (pf,
- ., wa5mmGt0N D C 20cN, February 10, 1984 00C.W gthC g
Alan S.
Rosenthal, Chairman Christine N. Kohl Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr. Reginald L.
Cotchy Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing 1.ppeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555 Re:
In the Matter of Commonwealth Edison Company (Byron Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2)
Docket Nos. 50-454 and 50-455
Dear Administrative Judges:
Pursuant to Applicant's obligation under Duke Power Co. (William B.
McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 &nd 2), ALAB-143, 6 AEC 623, 625-26 (1973), we are furnishing the following documents which are relevant to matters dis-cussed in the Licensing Board's January 13, 1984 initial decision (LBP-84-2), 19 NRC
).:
I.
Enforcement Actions A.
Dresden Station. Unit No.
2, EA 83-103 1.
Letter from James G.
Keppler to James J.
g O'Connor dated November 18, 1983 (Attach-ment 1).
2.
Letter from Cordell Reed to R.
C.
DeYoung dated January 20, 1984 (Attachment 2).
8402160251 840210 gDR-ADocK0500o454 PDR a
(.
s.
Administrative Judges Page Two February 10, 1984 B.
LaSalle County Station, Unit 1, EA 83-134 1.
Letter from Cordell Reed to R.
C. DeYoung dated January 18, 1984 (Attachment 3).
2.
Letter from James G.
Keppler to J. J.
O'Connor dated December 21, 1983 (Attach-ment 4).
C.
LaSalle County Station, Unit 1, EA 83-59 1.
Letter from C.
W.
Schroeder to R. C.
DeYoung dated December 20, 1983 (Attach-ment 5).
2.
Letter from R. C..DeYoung to James J.
O'Connor dated November 30, 1983 (Attach-ment 6).
3.
Letter from Cordell Reed to James G.
Keppler dated September 6, 1983 (Attach-ment 7).
4.
Letter from James G.
Keppler to James J.
O'Connor dated August 9, 1983 (Attach-ment 8).
D.
Zion Station, Units 1 and 2, EA 83-72 1.
Letter from D.
L. Farrar to R. C. DeYoung dated December 7, 1983 (Attachment 9).
2.
Letter from R.
C. DeYoung to Cordell Reed dated November 9.
1983 (Attachment 10).
~
3.
Letter from James G.
Keppler to James J.
O'Connor dated August 24, 1983 (Attach-ment 11).
E.
Zion Station, Units 1 and 2, EA 83-29 1.
Letter from Cordell Reed to R.
C.
- DeYoung, 4
dated August 12, 1983 (Attachment 12).
2.
Letter from R.
C.
DeYoung to James J.
O'Connor dated July 26, 1983 (Attachment 13).
g Administrative Judges Page Three February 10, 1984 3.
Letter from Cordell Reed to James G.
Keppler dated June 9, 1983 (Attach-ment 14).
4.
Letter from James G. Keppler to Cordell Reed dated May 3, 1983 (Attachment 15).
F.
Quad Cities Station, Unit 1, EA 03-44 1.
Letter from B.
L.
Thoman to James G.
Keppler dated August 12, 1983 (Attachment 16).
2.
Letter from Jaraos G. Keppler to James J.
O'Connor dated June 21, 1983 (Attachment 17).
G.
Braidwood Station, Units 1 and 2, EA 82-136 1.
Letter from Cordell Reed to R.
C.
DeYoung dated July 27, 1983 (Attachment 18).
2.
Letter from R.
C.
DeYoung to James J..O'Connor dated June 27, 1983 (Attachment 19).
H.
Quad Cities Station, Units 1 and 2, EA A'-19 1.
Letter from Cordell Reed to Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, USNRC, dated May 9, 1983 (Attachment 20).
2.
Letter from James G. Keppler to James J.
O'Connor dated April ll. 1983 (Attachment 21).
I.
Dresden Station, Units 2 and 3, Quad Cities Station, Units 1 and 2, EA 82-141 1.
Letter from Cordell Reed to Director, Office of Inspection and Enforcement, USNRC, dated April 14, 1983 (Attachment 22).
2.
Letter from James G.
Keppler to James J.
O'Connor, dated February 16, 1983 (Attachment 23).
II.
Reinsf,2ction Program Audits and Surveillances 1.
Commonwealth Edison Audit of Byron Rein-spection Program Audit No. 6-83-66 with close-out documentation (Attachment 24).
4 Administrative Judges Page Four February 10, 1984 2.
Ca onwealth Edison Quality Assurance Audit, Byron Site Reinspection Program, November.14-17, 1983, No. 6-83-93, with close-out documentation (Attachment 25).
3.
Commonwealth Edison Audit Report, Hatfield Electric Company, Audit No. 6-83-124, with
'close-out documentation (Attachment 26).
4.
Byron Site VA Surveillance Report No. 5753 (Attachment 27).
5.
Bryon Site QA Surveillance Report ho. 5682 (Attachment 28).
6.
Byron Site OA Surveillance Report No.
5700 (Attachment 29).
III. NRC Special Inspection Regarding Worker Allegations 1.
Letter from R. C. Knop to Cordell Reed dated January 30, 1984 (Attachment 30).
Attachments 1 through 23 pertain to enforcement proceedings involving the imposition, or proposed impo-sition, of civil penalties by the NRC on Commonwealth Edison Company.
See LBP-84-2, slip op. pp. 131-136.
Attachments 18 through 27 discuss civil penalties which were pending
.during the March and April hearings on quality assurance matters and have subsequently been paid.
One of the' civil penalty proceedings (Attachments 20.and 21) was the subject of a stipulation between the parties filed with the Licensing Board, but not referred to in its initial decision.
2 (Sde letter from Jane M. Whicher to Licensing Board dated June 29, i
1983.)
[
Attachments 3 through 17 discuss civil penalties which were proposed and paid following the hearings.
Attachments 1 and 2 relate to a pending enforcement action.
In view of the fact that the Company's enforcement 5
action history was raised as an issue by the Intervenors, i
recognize that the information is relevant we E
L to the matters under adjudication.
None of the civil penalties, either M
proposed or paid, concern Byrcn Station.
Only one, the Braidwood Station civil penalty (Attachment 18), which was
'z.
the subject of findings by the Licensing Board (Initial Decision, 1D-26-D-30) relates to plants under construction.
E We acknowledge that information concerning certain of these E
Eli b
5.la k_'
e o'
~
Administrative Judges Page Five February 10, 1984 enforcement actions mentioned above should have been pro-vided to the Board at an earlier date.
The failure to have provided the information earlier is due to inadvertence arising out of miscommunications internal to Commonwealth Edison Company and Isham, Lincoln & Beale.
Attachments 24 through 2c are Commo.nwealth Edison Company audit surveillance reports which relate to the rainspection program. 4 is audit report package 6-83-66.
The audit report was previously provided to
-Intervenors during the August hearings.
The surveillance reports attached to the audit report document follow-up actions taken in response to the audit.
All findings aad observations have been closed. 5 is audit report package 6-83-93.
Finding #1, as explained in Surveillence Report Number 5696, remains open pending further follow-up action. 6 is audit report package 6-83-124.
Findings 1 and 2 remain open pending further follow-up action as explained in surveillance reports 5275 and 5274.
Attachments 27 through 29 are surveillance reports which relate to the reinspection program, but which were not tied to a quality assurance audit.
As explained in the reports the surveillances are considered closed. 0 is a report of the NRC Staff's special
. inspection regarding. worker allegatiens concerning construction activities at Byron Station.
The report also summarizes the Region III inspections as of November 22, 1983 relative to
-the reinspection program.
Very truly years, u
/
o Michael I. Miller One of the Attorneys for Commonwealth Edison Company MIM:gi Enclosures cc: (w/ enclosures) Service List i-
_