ML20151B830: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 19: Line 19:
e Consumers -
e Consumers -
   @rewanme MBUNeAN'S PROGRE55 Power General offices: 1945 West Parnait Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (517) 788 0550 July 15, 1988 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-155 - LICENSE DPR BIG ROCK POINT PLANT -
   @rewanme MBUNeAN'S PROGRE55 Power General offices: 1945 West Parnait Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (517) 788 0550 July 15, 1988 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-155 - LICENSE DPR BIG ROCK POINT PLANT -
CONTINUED USE OF-NUCOM HAFNIUM CONTROL BLADES SAFETY EVALUATION CORRECTION By letter dated April 28, 1988, Consumers Power Company submitted a continuing Control Blade Surveillance Program for NRC approval. NRC letter dated May 17, 1988 approved the Surveillance Program and provided a safety evaluation. Our review of the NRC safety evaluation identified an erroneous statement in the evaluation. ihis submittal is to document the error and to request that the safety evaluation be corrected to eliminate future misinterpretations.
CONTINUED USE OF-NUCOM HAFNIUM CONTROL BLADES SAFETY EVALUATION CORRECTION By {{letter dated|date=April 28, 1988|text=letter dated April 28, 1988}}, Consumers Power Company submitted a continuing Control Blade Surveillance Program for NRC approval. NRC {{letter dated|date=May 17, 1988|text=letter dated May 17, 1988}} approved the Surveillance Program and provided a safety evaluation. Our review of the NRC safety evaluation identified an erroneous statement in the evaluation. ihis submittal is to document the error and to request that the safety evaluation be corrected to eliminate future misinterpretations.
Paragraph 2.2 of the safety evaluation contair.s the statement "The control blades are also weighed to identify possible corrosion or dimensional changes".
Paragraph 2.2 of the safety evaluation contair.s the statement "The control blades are also weighed to identify possible corrosion or dimensional changes".
Weighing of control blades was not intended to be included as an item in our surveillance program as submicted by our April 28, 1988 letter. The discussion on control blade weight was provided to address a previous concern of the reviewer of Amendment 88 which authorized use of the Hafnium control blades.
Weighing of control blades was not intended to be included as an item in our surveillance program as submicted by our {{letter dated|date=April 28, 1988|text=April 28, 1988 letter}}. The discussion on control blade weight was provided to address a previous concern of the reviewer of Amendment 88 which authorized use of the Hafnium control blades.
Through discussions with our NRC Project Manager it has been determined that weighing of control blades was reviewed as part of the surveillance program because our submittal was not totally clear. In our submittal major topical headings were underlined and other topical headings were not underlined.
Through discussions with our NRC Project Manager it has been determined that weighing of control blades was reviewed as part of the surveillance program because our submittal was not totally clear. In our submittal major topical headings were underlined and other topical headings were not underlined.
Because the topical heading for the control blade wcight discussion was presented after the continued surveillance program, the reviewer assumed the weight discussion was also part cf the surveillance program. This was not intended to be the case. Deletion of the above referenced statement will prevent future misinterpretations of what is specifically intended to be elements of the Control Blade Surveillance Program.
Because the topical heading for the control blade wcight discussion was presented after the continued surveillance program, the reviewer assumed the weight discussion was also part cf the surveillance program. This was not intended to be the case. Deletion of the above referenced statement will prevent future misinterpretations of what is specifically intended to be elements of the Control Blade Surveillance Program.

Latest revision as of 06:51, 11 December 2021

Documents Error in NRC 880517 Safety Evaluation Re Continuing Control Blade Surveillance Program & Requests Correction to Eliminate Future Misinterpretations
ML20151B830
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/15/1988
From: Frisch R
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
NUDOCS 8807210122
Download: ML20151B830 (1)


Text

e Consumers -

@rewanme MBUNeAN'S PROGRE55 Power General offices: 1945 West Parnait Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (517) 788 0550 July 15, 1988 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 DOCKET 50-155 - LICENSE DPR BIG ROCK POINT PLANT -

CONTINUED USE OF-NUCOM HAFNIUM CONTROL BLADES SAFETY EVALUATION CORRECTION By letter dated April 28, 1988, Consumers Power Company submitted a continuing Control Blade Surveillance Program for NRC approval. NRC letter dated May 17, 1988 approved the Surveillance Program and provided a safety evaluation. Our review of the NRC safety evaluation identified an erroneous statement in the evaluation. ihis submittal is to document the error and to request that the safety evaluation be corrected to eliminate future misinterpretations.

Paragraph 2.2 of the safety evaluation contair.s the statement "The control blades are also weighed to identify possible corrosion or dimensional changes".

Weighing of control blades was not intended to be included as an item in our surveillance program as submicted by our April 28, 1988 letter. The discussion on control blade weight was provided to address a previous concern of the reviewer of Amendment 88 which authorized use of the Hafnium control blades.

Through discussions with our NRC Project Manager it has been determined that weighing of control blades was reviewed as part of the surveillance program because our submittal was not totally clear. In our submittal major topical headings were underlined and other topical headings were not underlined.

Because the topical heading for the control blade wcight discussion was presented after the continued surveillance program, the reviewer assumed the weight discussion was also part cf the surveillance program. This was not intended to be the case. Deletion of the above referenced statement will prevent future misinterpretations of what is specifically intended to be elements of the Control Blade Surveillance Program.

Y Ralph R Frisch M.

Senior Licensing Analyst CC Administrator, Region III, NRC NRC Resident Inspector - Big Rcck Point Plant (

l 0 OC0788-0070-NLO2 ,

8807210122 G80715 PDR ADOCK 05000155 P POC ,

, - - , , . - .. - -.