IR 05000155/1988008

Insp Rept 50-155/88-08 on 880413-14 & 0503-05.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Inservice Insp Activities Including Review of Programs

ML20154F659
Person / Time
Site:	Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date:	05/17/1988
From:	Danielson D, Ward K NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20154F656	List: IR 05000155/1988008 ML20154F654
References
50-155-88-08, 50-155-88-8, IEIN-88-003, IEIN-88-3, NUDOCS 8805240017
Download: ML20154F659 (4)

Text

_ -__

.

"*

.

e l :

'

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0FNISSION

REGION III

Report No'. 50-155/88008(DRS)

Docket No. 50-155 License No. DPR-6 Licensee: Consumers Power Company 21E West Michigan Avenue Jackson, MI 49201 Facility Name: Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant Inspection At: Big Rock Point Site, Charlevoix, Michigan Inspection 3-14 and May 3-5, 1988 Inspector- . D. Ward [ 7///

Date Approved By: D. H. Danielson, Chief 57 T Materials and Processes Date Section Inspection Sumary Inspection on April 13-14 and May 3-5, 1988 (Report No. 50-155/88008(DRS)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of inservice inspection ITSI) activities including review of programs (73051), procedures (73052),

observation of work activities (73753), and data review (73755); actions on Information Notice No. 88-03 (90717); and a modification / replacement (37701).

Results: No violations or deviations were identifie i

~

8805240017 88d517 PDR A D O C K 0 *A 0 0 1 5 5 Q DCD ,

Y

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.

-

.

DETAILS J Persons Contacted Consumers Power Company (CPCo)

• T. Elward, Plant Manager

• L. Monshor, QA Superintendent

• G. Withrow, Engineering and Maintenance Superintendent

• W. Alexander, Technical Engineer

• M. Acker, ISI Coordinator D. Gaiser, Engineering T. Fisher, QA Nuclear Regulatory Connission (NRC)

• N. Williamsen, Resident Inspector W. Scott, Project Manager (NRR)

S. Guthrie, Senior Resident Inspector E. Plettner, Senior Resident Inspector State of Michigan Department of Labor S. Hall, Nuclear Inspector Factory Mutual Engineering K. Blake, ANII .

'

R. Riegler, ANII W. McDougall, ANII

MQS Inspection, Inc. (MQS)

M. Sherwin, ISI Coordinator The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee and contractor employee ,

l

• Denotes those present at the exit interview May 5,1988.

l Licensee Action on Information Notices (Closed) Information Notice No. 88-03: Cracks in shroud support access hole cover welds. This information notice is not applicable to Big Rock '

Point. The site does not have jet pumps designed with access hole . Inservice Inspection (ISI)

! General (1) This was the fifth outage of the second period of the second ten-year pla !

!

(

2 f l I

- _ - - - .. ._ .- - .-. -.. --

-

.

-

.

l (2) CPCo Laboratory and Field Maintenance Services and Magnaflux Quality Services (MQS) performd the ISI in acccrdance with ASME Section XI,1977 Edition, Summer 1978 Addend CPCo performed ultrasonic (UT), liquid penetrant (PT), and visual examinations (VT). MQS performed UT. The 8.evel II and III UT personnel performing UT in accordance with Generic Letter 84-11 were qualified at the EPRI NDE Center after September 10, 198 Manual pulse echo UT detection instruments and trancducers with various angles, sizes, and MHz were used. Also a master slave unit was used when examinations were performed in accordance with Generic Letter 84-1 (3) The licensee's sampling plan for addressing IGSCC concerns was in accordance with Generic Letter 84-11 and all welds were found to be acceptable. Generic Letter 88-01, NRC Position on IGSCC in BWR Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping, was sent to all licensees of BWRs and holders of construction permits for BWRs on January 25, 1988. NRR agreed with the licensee's position that the ISI program for austenitic stainless steel piping covered under the scope of Generic Letter 83-01 would be implemented at the next refueling outage, b. Programs and Procedures The NRC inspector reviewed the ISI procedures and programs and found them to be acceptable. Where those rules were determined to be impractical, specific relief was requested in writing. The NRC inspector reviewed the specific relief requests including the related correspondence between the licensee and the NR c. Review of Material, Equipment and Personnel Certifications, Audits and Data The NRC inspector reviewed documents relating to the following:

Data report Ultrasonic instruments, calibration blocks, transducers, and couplant certification *

Liquid penetrant, cleaner, and developer material certification NDE personnel certifications in accordance with SNT-TC-1 Audits, d. Observation of Work Activities The NRC inspector observed work and had discussions with personnel during the ISI activities. These observations included the folicwing:

Ultrasonic examination of reactor vessel head welds, weld No. 5-MRS-131-1, and two 6-MRS steam drum welds in the recirculation syste _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

.

-

.

O '

A hydro being performed on the liquid poison syste The State of Michigan and the Factory Mutual Engineering inspectors performing their dutie No violations or deviations were identifie . Modifications / Replacements RDS Valves Replacement During surveillance of the RDS depressurization valves by CPCo, it was discovered that the vent isolation i" globe valves No. VRDS-103C and No. VRDS-102C were leaking. As a remedy, they were replace This replacement was performed in accordance with ASME Section XI,1977 Edition, Sumner 1978 Addenda. The NRC inspector reviewed NDE and welding reports and other NDE and welding documents; also inspected the final installation of the two valve No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Meeting The inspector met with site representatives (denoted in Persons Contacted paragraph) at the conclusion of the inspection. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection noted in this report. The inspector also discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regard to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspection. The licensee did not identify any such documents / processes a proprietar