ML20127F844: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20127F844
| number = ML20127F844
| issue date = 04/10/1985
| issue date = 04/10/1985
| title = Responds to NRC 841030 Ltr Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-438/84-21 & 50-439/84-21.Corrective Actions:Plumb & Levelness Requirements Incorporated Into General Drawing, QC Procedure 6.7 Revised & Ducts Inspected
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-438/84-21 & 50-439/84-21.Corrective Actions:Plumb & Levelness Requirements Incorporated Into General Drawing, QC Procedure 6.7 Revised & Ducts Inspected
| author name = Mccloud D
| author name = Mccloud D
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8505200608
| document report number = NUDOCS 8505200608
| title reference date = 10-30-1984
| package number = ML20127F827
| package number = ML20127F827
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
Line 23: Line 24:
==Dear Dr. Grace:==
==Dear Dr. Grace:==


BELLEFGITE NUCLEAR PLANT WITS 1 AND 2 - FINAL RESPWSE TO VI1ATIN 50 4 38/84-21-01, 50 4 39/84-21 FAILWE TO FILOW DRAWINW FOR HVAC StPPORT EECrIm AND INSPECTIN TVA responded to D. M. Verrelli's letter dated October 30, 1984, report numbers 50 4 38/84-21, 50 4 39/84-21 concerning the subject violation by letter dated November 30, 1984. Enclosed is our final response to the violation.
BELLEFGITE NUCLEAR PLANT WITS 1 AND 2 - FINAL RESPWSE TO VI1ATIN 50 4 38/84-21-01, 50 4 39/84-21 FAILWE TO FILOW DRAWINW FOR HVAC StPPORT EECrIm AND INSPECTIN TVA responded to D. M. Verrelli's {{letter dated|date=October 30, 1984|text=letter dated October 30, 1984}}, report numbers 50 4 38/84-21, 50 4 39/84-21 concerning the subject violation by {{letter dated|date=November 30, 1984|text=letter dated November 30, 1984}}. Enclosed is our final response to the violation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H.' Shell at FTS 858,2688.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H.' Shell at FTS 858,2688.
To the best of my knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are complete and true.
To the best of my knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are complete and true.

Latest revision as of 05:24, 22 August 2022

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-438/84-21 & 50-439/84-21.Corrective Actions:Plumb & Levelness Requirements Incorporated Into General Drawing, QC Procedure 6.7 Revised & Ducts Inspected
ML20127F844
Person / Time
Site: Bellefonte  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 04/10/1985
From: Mccloud D
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20127F827 List:
References
NUDOCS 8505200608
Download: ML20127F844 (2)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -

l TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY l CHATTANOOGA. TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut 3,tge T er II April 10, 19

  • 3p U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Attn: Dr. J. Nelson Grace, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Dr. Grace:

BELLEFGITE NUCLEAR PLANT WITS 1 AND 2 - FINAL RESPWSE TO VI1ATIN 50 4 38/84-21-01, 50 4 39/84-21 FAILWE TO FILOW DRAWINW FOR HVAC StPPORT EECrIm AND INSPECTIN TVA responded to D. M. Verrelli's letter dated October 30, 1984, report numbers 50 4 38/84-21, 50 4 39/84-21 concerning the subject violation by letter dated November 30, 1984. Enclosed is our final response to the violation.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H.' Shell at FTS 858,2688.

To the best of my knowledge, I declare the statements contained herein are complete and true.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY D. E. McCloud Nuolear Engineer Enclosure oo (Enclosure):

Mr. Jastes Taylor, Dimotor Office of Inspection and Enforoement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Records Center Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 Circle 75 Parkway, S2ite 1500 Atlanta, Georgia 30339 8505200600 850422 PDR ADOCK 05000430 0 PDR An Equal Opportunity Employer

EN150RE *

[' BELLEFOITE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2

~

FINAL RESPQiSE TO SEVERITY LEVEL V VIOLATIQi 50-438/84-21-01, 50-439/84-21-01 FAILURE TO FOLLOW DRAWING FOR HV AC SUPPORT, EIECrIOi, AND INSPECTIOi Demription of Deficiency 10 GR 50, Appendix B, Criteria V and X, and the accepted quality assurance program (TV A-TR-75-1A), Sections 17.1 A.5 and 17.1 A.10 require in part that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with drawings and that a program for inspection of activities affecting quality be executed to verify confermance with documented drawings. Bellefonte Nuclear Plant (BLN) drawing No. 4 AWC864-2-1, R4, Note 9 requires that heating, ventilating, and air-conditionir3 (HVAC) supports shall be fabricatM and erected in accordance with the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) specificaton,1969 edition as revised through 1974.

Contrary to the above, between August 1 and September 20, 1984, activities affecting quality were not being accomplished in accordance with documented drawings in that HVAC support No. Of C-298 did not meet the 1:500 levelness required by the AISC specification and a program for inspection of activities affecting quality was not executed to verify confonnance with documented drawings in that all HVAC supports were rot being inspected for this re qui rement .

Correc tive S tep s Taken Nonconfonnance Report (NCR) 3515 was initiatM by BLN Office of Construction (OC) to document the fact that the AISC specification did not adequately address the levelness requirements for HV AC duct supports. Specific pluub and levelness requirements have been incorporatM on a TVA T general note drawing. BLN site procedure (quality control procedure (QCP) 6.7) has been revised to mflect this criteria.

13f AC support No. OVC-298 has been reworked to meet the 1:500 levelness requimd by AISC specification. Additiornlly, BLN OC has performed a sample inspection involving 200 previously installed duct supports in accordance with MIL STD 105D and no discrepancies were fomd. TV A is in full compliance, and NCR 3515 has been closM.

t m