ML20108B484

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Deficiency Rept Ncr 2857 for Unit 1 & Third Interim Rept Ncr 2915 for Unit 2 Re Defects Pressure Vessel Stud Bolt Holes.Initially Reported on 840216.Unit 1 Stud Holes Dispositioned to use-as-is
ML20108B484
Person / Time
Site: Bellefonte  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1984
From: Mills L
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
References
NCR-2857, NCR-2915, NUDOCS 8411160079
Download: ML20108B484 (3)


Text

_. . . . . _ __ . ._ _ ,_ . -

[

L io i s .

-'- TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH ATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 374of '

400 Chestnut Street Tower II j 007 $

October 30,~1984 Aff.{y-BLRD-50-438/84-19 j BLRD-50-439/84-18 I

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ~

Region II ,

Attn: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator i 101 Marietta Str3et, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323

Dear Mr. O'Heilly:

BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 - DEFECTS IN REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL STUD BOLT HOLES - BLRD-50-438/84-19, BLRD-50-439/84 FINAL REPORT FOR~

l UNIT 1 AND THIRD INTERIM REPORT FOR UNIT 2 i

The subject deficiency was initially mported for unit 1 to NRC-0IE ,

Inspector P. E. Fredrickson on February 16, 1984 in accordance with 10 CFR

50.55(e) as NCR 2857. NCR 2915_was subsequently idatified which documented the deficiency for unit 2. This was followed by our interim reports dated March 14 and July 13, 1984. Enclosed is our final report for

~

unit 1 and our third interim report for unit 2. We expect to submit our

! next report on unit 2 on er about February 28, 1985.

If you have any questians, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688.

Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY L. M. Mills, Manager Nuclear Licensing Enclosure cc: Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director (Enclosure)

! Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 4 Washington, D.C. 20555 i

Records Center (Enclosure) i Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 Circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1500 At.',anta, Georgia 30339 8411160079 841020 PDR ADOCK 05000438 OFFICIAL COPY S PDR -- -

An Equal Opportunity Employer i _

_ _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ ~_ ._.___ _ i_ _

v m. M es

.xyyhngygg i

' ^

~ D : ' hli:Qpff s w BELLEFONTE NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 " ' -

DEFECTS IN REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL STUD BOLT HOLES 7 BLRD-50-438/84-19, BLRD-50-439/84-18 _Oc NCRs 2857 AND 2915 10 CFR 50.55(e) --

FINAL REPORT FOR UNIT 1 AND THIRD INTERIM REPORT FOR UNIT 2 Description of Deficiency It was identified that 56 of the 60 unit 1 reactor pressure vessel (RPV) stud bolt holes have damaged, corrosion pitted, tool chattered, stained and rough '

threads. Five of the stud holes were rejectable when checked with the vendor-supplied no-go gauge (used for checking dimensional configuration of the threads). This was documented on Nonconformance Report (NCR) 2857.

This condition has subseqeently been identified as applicable to unit 2 in that 57 of the 60 unit 2 stud holes have similar corrosion damaged, tool l chattered and rough threads. Of the 58 stud holes gauged, six were l rejectable when checked with go and no-go gauges. Two of the RPV stud holes were not checked due to the insertion of alignment studs. This condition for unit 2 has been documented on NCR 2915.

IVA has determined that the corrosion damage and staining is due to a lack of adequate preventive maintenance and inspections. Some of the damaged threads  ;

may be due to mishandling of the temporary stud bolts during installation of the RPV. Preventive maintenance was inadequate because the manufacturer's maintenance instructions were not completely included on the maintenance inspection requirements sheet, attachment B of Bellefonte Nuclear Plant Quality Control Procedure (BNP-QCP) 1.3 " Preventive Maintenance."

Safety Implications It is uncertain what effects the corrosion and damage would have had on the integrity of the closure of the RPV. However, had the condition remained uncorrected, further degradation of the RPV stud bolt holes due to corrosion damage could have occurred. This further degraded condition could possibly have led to a failure of the affected stud holes during normal operating or upset conditions. Thus, this condition could possibly have adversely affected the safe operation of the plant.

Corrective Action for Unit 1 (NCR 2857)

TVA's Office of Engineering (OE) requested a disposition of the subject deficiency from the vendor, Babcock and Wilcox (B&W). Based on B&W's inspection data and analysis (B&W document Nos. 51-1151007-00 and 32-1150598- -

00), B&W has recommended dispositioning the affected unit 1 RPV stud bolt holes to use-as-is. TVA has approved this disposition and has closed NCR 2857 accordingly.

  1. M ,.

3 w.,

N*.x .s 4 _ M $1 b? SC; 3 ~a- .a ._

o ,

, ., s .

,m  :=

i

. 'r _,;. ,
f'~.q<',_..

. ;Q >; ; f g M ,9l1;, gq; N; 5 t Ta pn vent mourrento cf this d;ficientyTTVA'will: follow B&W'O ml..ommnded PcdN${

~.

E!

maintenanca instrue ti nnnd"wi11 '612:n 'cach Cffected; stud b;1t hil3l 'nd ' @" WM$ks apply an approved protective coating 'to each 'hcle'." Each stud bolt hole' with 'I' l'a.. Sd a seal plug and 0-ring will be inspected every 6 months. :Any evidence of- y1 .-l , ~

~

moisture, rust, or bleeding of rust' from existing pitted holes will require E2 ,i that the affected holes be cleaned, coated and resealed. Stud bolt holes not ' '" ' v having seal plugs installed will have a wooden cap installed and will be .

inspected every 2 months. The maintenance requirements sheet, attachment B of BNP-QCP 1 3, for the RPV stud bolt holes has been revised to reflect these requirements.

Interim Progress for Unit 2 (NCR 2915)

TVA has requested B&W to perform an inspection and analysis of each RPV stud ,

bolt hole for unit 2. Further corrective action regarding this deficiency will be determined after B&W presents the results of their investigation.

4 w--sa% u, '_ , aw' ,: ~ ' js ~-V,* -L

.r _ ,.

4<.;,,_a,....._.. . . . . . . . . , , , e_ ,_ aw , _. _1, , , , _ ,