ML20058G599: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20058G599
| number = ML20058G599
| issue date = 07/12/1982
| issue date = 07/12/1982
| title = Responds to NRC 820603 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-438/82-11 & 50-439/82-11.Addl Info Re 10CFR50.55e Should Be Identified as Soon as Possible
| title = Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-438/82-11 & 50-439/82-11.Addl Info Re 10CFR50.55e Should Be Identified as Soon as Possible
| author name = Mills L
| author name = Mills L
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
| author affiliation = TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8208030373
| document report number = NUDOCS 8208030373
| title reference date = 06-03-1982
| package number = ML20058G579
| package number = ML20058G579
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, UTILITY TO NRC
Line 25: Line 26:
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==
==Dear Mr. O'Reilly:==


ALL TVA NUCLEAR PLANTS - RESPONSE TO CONCERNS RAISED BY INSPECTION REPORT 50-438/82-11 AND 50-439/82-11 In R. C. Lewis' letter dated June 3, 1982, report numbers 50-438/82-11 and 50-439/82-11, concerns were raised over Licensee Identified Items for the Dellefonte Nuclear Plant. In the subject report, it was stated in part that (1) the majority of our final reports submitted on 10 CFR 50.55(e) items did not provide sufficient information, (2) the relevant data was not readily available at the site, (3) it could not be datermined whether some final reports had been submitted, and (4) the infonnatior was discussed with and requested from site personnel. If RII believes a final report on a 10 CFR 50.55(e) item is deficient, or wishes to see specific supplemental information in the future, please identify the additional information as early as possible to R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688 for PWRs and J. A. Domer at FTS 858-2725 for BWRs. This will allow us to supplement the report and/or gather the necessary information from Knoxville and Chattanooga and ensure its availability at the plant site. TVA wants to fully support RII's inspection efforts at all our sites and believes following these established channels of communication will improve that support. These channels of communication were discussed with you and your staff in a meeting on February 27, 1981.
ALL TVA NUCLEAR PLANTS - RESPONSE TO CONCERNS RAISED BY INSPECTION REPORT 50-438/82-11 AND 50-439/82-11 In R. C. Lewis' {{letter dated|date=June 3, 1982|text=letter dated June 3, 1982}}, report numbers 50-438/82-11 and 50-439/82-11, concerns were raised over Licensee Identified Items for the Dellefonte Nuclear Plant. In the subject report, it was stated in part that (1) the majority of our final reports submitted on 10 CFR 50.55(e) items did not provide sufficient information, (2) the relevant data was not readily available at the site, (3) it could not be datermined whether some final reports had been submitted, and (4) the infonnatior was discussed with and requested from site personnel. If RII believes a final report on a 10 CFR 50.55(e) item is deficient, or wishes to see specific supplemental information in the future, please identify the additional information as early as possible to R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688 for PWRs and J. A. Domer at FTS 858-2725 for BWRs. This will allow us to supplement the report and/or gather the necessary information from Knoxville and Chattanooga and ensure its availability at the plant site. TVA wants to fully support RII's inspection efforts at all our sites and believes following these established channels of communication will improve that support. These channels of communication were discussed with you and your staff in a meeting on February 27, 1981.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688.
Very truly yours, TENN SSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Very truly yours, TENN SSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Latest revision as of 18:46, 3 June 2023

Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-438/82-11 & 50-439/82-11.Addl Info Re 10CFR50.55e Should Be Identified as Soon as Possible
ML20058G599
Person / Time
Site: Bellefonte  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/1982
From: Mills L
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20058G579 List:
References
NUDOCS 8208030373
Download: ML20058G599 (1)
v • d • e


Text

-

TENNESSEE VALLEY . AUTHORITY

.noh . 4 -

CHATTANQOGA, .TENNESSEC 374ol 400 Chestnu't St'teet Tower II NM$ J ly 2, 1982 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission -

Region II Attn: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

ALL TVA NUCLEAR PLANTS - RESPONSE TO CONCERNS RAISED BY INSPECTION REPORT 50-438/82-11 AND 50-439/82-11 In R. C. Lewis' letter dated June 3, 1982, report numbers 50-438/82-11 and 50-439/82-11, concerns were raised over Licensee Identified Items for the Dellefonte Nuclear Plant. In the subject report, it was stated in part that (1) the majority of our final reports submitted on 10 CFR 50.55(e) items did not provide sufficient information, (2) the relevant data was not readily available at the site, (3) it could not be datermined whether some final reports had been submitted, and (4) the infonnatior was discussed with and requested from site personnel. If RII believes a final report on a 10 CFR 50.55(e) item is deficient, or wishes to see specific supplemental information in the future, please identify the additional information as early as possible to R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688 for PWRs and J. A. Domer at FTS 858-2725 for BWRs. This will allow us to supplement the report and/or gather the necessary information from Knoxville and Chattanooga and ensure its availability at the plant site. TVA wants to fully support RII's inspection efforts at all our sites and believes following these established channels of communication will improve that support. These channels of communication were discussed with you and your staff in a meeting on February 27, 1981.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with R. H. Shell at FTS 858-2688.

Very truly yours, TENN SSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

~

L. M. Mills, M ager Nuclear Licensing cc: Mr. Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 0

0 An Equal Opportunity Employer

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20058G599&oldid=3566823"