ML20151Z309: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[IR 05000321/1987025]]
{{Adams
| number = ML20151Z309
| issue date = 04/28/1988
| title = Suppl to Insp Repts 50-321/87-25 & 50-366/87-25,consisting of Results of Measurements of Split Water Samples & Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements
| author name =
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
| addressee name =
| addressee affiliation =
| docket = 05000321, 05000366
| license number =
| contact person =
| document report number = 50-321-87-25, 50-366-87-25, NUDOCS 8805050245
| package number = ML20151X136
| document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
| page count = 2
}}
See also: [[see also::IR 05000321/1987025]]
 
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:l
l
                                                                                                                                .
                                                                                                                                  -
                                                              ENCLOSURE 1
                                                      COMPARISON Of MEASUREMENTS
                                                  H-3. pCi/l                                      Ratio
                                    Licensee                    NRQ            Resolu(i_on
                                                                                          i  f licensgg/NRQ,} Qomparison
    } ample ID
l
                                            231                4140    230            18        0.93        Agreement
    SN 13$0 (T-2, 81R2365)          3840
                                                              5640 t 240              24        0.94        Ag reement
'
    SN 1351 (T-3, 87R2366)          5280 1 248
                                                              < 350                  -          -          Not Compared
    SN 1352 ( T-4, 87R2358)          < 300
    51 1353 ( T-8, 87P2259)          1190 1 196                1070 1 210                5        1.11        Ag reement
i
    $1 1354 (T-12, 87R2360)          121000 1 1720            115000 1 600          191          1.05        Ag reement
                                                                                                                              *
                                    4670 1 241                2620 1 230              11          1.78        Di sag reement
    SN 13$5 (T  *3,  87R2362)
                                                              1060 t 210                5        1.02        Ag reemen t
    SN 1356 (1-16, 8782361)          1080 f 194
                                                              3480    230            15          1.21        Agreement
    SN 1357 (NTA, 81R2363)          4220 2 235
                                                              < 350                  -          -          Not Compared
    S3 1358 (P15A, STR2356)          -99.6 1 177
                                                              15I00 2 300            52          0.91        Ag reement
l  SN 1359 ( P158, 87R2364)        14300 t 335
                                                              < 350                  -          -          Not Compa red
    53 1360 ( P11A, 87R2357)        < 300
l
i
i
l
                                  e
          PDR
          O
,
L _ _ _ ________          - _ . _                                                                                    -_-
 
, .                                s
                              e
                    -
                                            ENCLOSURE 2
                    Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements
    This enclosure provides criteria for comparing results of capability tests and
    verification measurenients. The criteria are based on an empirical relationship
    which combines prior experience and the accuracy needs of this program.
    In these criteria, the judgement limits denoting agreement or disagreement
    between licensee and NRC results are viable. This variability is a function of
    the NRC's value relative to its associated uncertainty, referred to in this
    program as "Resolution"* increases, the range of acceptable differences between
    the NRC and licensee values should be more restrictive. Conversely, poorer
    agreement between NRC and licensee values must be considered acceptable as the
    resolution decreases.
    For comparison purposes, a ratio of the licensee value to the NRC value for
                                          2
    each individual nuclide is computed.          This ratio is then evaluated for
    agreement based on the calculated resolution. The corresponding resolution and
    calculated ratios which denote agreement are listed in the Table below. Values
    outside of the agreement ratios for a selected nuclide are considered in
    disagreement.
                2 Resolution = NRC Reference Value for a Particular Nuclide
                                      Associated Uncertainty for the Value
                "Comparison Ratio =      Licensee Value
                                      N5C Reference Value
                                              TABLE
                        Confirmatory Measurements Acceptance Criteria
                              Resolutions vs. Comparison Ratio
                                                        Comparison Ratio
                                                                for
                    Resolution                              Agreement
                    < 4                                    0.4  - 2.5
                        4-      7                          0.5 - 2.0
                        8-    15                          0.6 - 1.66
                        16 - 50                            0.75 - 1.33
                        51 - 200                            0.80 - 1.R5,
                    >200                                  0.85 - 1.18
}}

Latest revision as of 06:27, 31 May 2022

Suppl to Insp Repts 50-321/87-25 & 50-366/87-25,consisting of Results of Measurements of Split Water Samples & Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements
ML20151Z309
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/1988
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151X136 List:
References
50-321-87-25, 50-366-87-25, NUDOCS 8805050245
Download: ML20151Z309 (2)


See also: IR 05000321/1987025

Text

l

l

.

-

ENCLOSURE 1

COMPARISON Of MEASUREMENTS

H-3. pCi/l Ratio

Licensee NRQ Resolu(i_on

i f licensgg/NRQ,} Qomparison

} ample ID

l

231 4140 230 18 0.93 Agreement

SN 13$0 (T-2, 81R2365) 3840

5640 t 240 24 0.94 Ag reement

'

SN 1351 (T-3, 87R2366) 5280 1 248

< 350 - - Not Compared

SN 1352 ( T-4, 87R2358) < 300

51 1353 ( T-8, 87P2259) 1190 1 196 1070 1 210 5 1.11 Ag reement

i

$1 1354 (T-12, 87R2360) 121000 1 1720 115000 1 600 191 1.05 Ag reement

4670 1 241 2620 1 230 11 1.78 Di sag reement

SN 13$5 (T *3, 87R2362)

1060 t 210 5 1.02 Ag reemen t

SN 1356 (1-16, 8782361) 1080 f 194

3480 230 15 1.21 Agreement

SN 1357 (NTA, 81R2363) 4220 2 235

< 350 - - Not Compared

S3 1358 (P15A, STR2356) -99.6 1 177

15I00 2 300 52 0.91 Ag reement

l SN 1359 ( P158, 87R2364) 14300 t 335

< 350 - - Not Compa red

53 1360 ( P11A, 87R2357) < 300

l

i

i

l

e

PDR

O

,

L _ _ _ ________ - _ . _ -_-

, . s

e

-

ENCLOSURE 2

Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements

This enclosure provides criteria for comparing results of capability tests and

verification measurenients. The criteria are based on an empirical relationship

which combines prior experience and the accuracy needs of this program.

In these criteria, the judgement limits denoting agreement or disagreement

between licensee and NRC results are viable. This variability is a function of

the NRC's value relative to its associated uncertainty, referred to in this

program as "Resolution"* increases, the range of acceptable differences between

the NRC and licensee values should be more restrictive. Conversely, poorer

agreement between NRC and licensee values must be considered acceptable as the

resolution decreases.

For comparison purposes, a ratio of the licensee value to the NRC value for

2

each individual nuclide is computed. This ratio is then evaluated for

agreement based on the calculated resolution. The corresponding resolution and

calculated ratios which denote agreement are listed in the Table below. Values

outside of the agreement ratios for a selected nuclide are considered in

disagreement.

2 Resolution = NRC Reference Value for a Particular Nuclide

Associated Uncertainty for the Value

"Comparison Ratio = Licensee Value

N5C Reference Value

TABLE

Confirmatory Measurements Acceptance Criteria

Resolutions vs. Comparison Ratio

Comparison Ratio

for

Resolution Agreement

< 4 0.4 - 2.5

4- 7 0.5 - 2.0

8- 15 0.6 - 1.66

16 - 50 0.75 - 1.33

51 - 200 0.80 - 1.R5,

>200 0.85 - 1.18