ML20151Z309

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suppl to Insp Repts 50-321/87-25 & 50-366/87-25,consisting of Results of Measurements of Split Water Samples & Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements
ML20151Z309
Person / Time
Site: Hatch  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/28/1988
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20151X136 List:
References
50-321-87-25, 50-366-87-25, NUDOCS 8805050245
Download: ML20151Z309 (2)


See also: IR 05000321/1987025

Text

l

l

.

ENCLOSURE 1

-

COMPARISON Of MEASUREMENTS

H-3. pCi/l

Ratio

l

} ample ID

Licensee

NRQ

Resolu(i_on

f licensgg/NRQ,}

Qomparison

i

SN 13$0 (T-2, 81R2365)

3840

231

4140

230

18

0.93

Agreement

SN 1351 (T-3, 87R2366)

5280 1 248

5640 t 240

24

0.94

Ag reement

'

Not Compared

SN 1352 ( T-4, 87R2358)

< 300

< 350

-

-

i

51 1353 ( T-8, 87P2259)

1190 1 196

1070 1 210

5

1.11

Ag reement

$1 1354 (T-12, 87R2360)

121000 1 1720

115000 1 600

191

1.05

Ag reement

SN 13$5 (T

  • 3, 87R2362)

4670 1 241

2620 1 230

11

1.78

Di sag reement

SN 1356 (1-16, 8782361)

1080 f 194

1060 t 210

5

1.02

Ag reemen t

SN 1357 (NTA, 81R2363)

4220 2 235

3480

230

15

1.21

Agreement

S3 1358 (P15A, STR2356)

-99.6 1 177

< 350

-

-

Not Compared

l

SN 1359 ( P158, 87R2364)

14300 t 335

15I00 2 300

52

0.91

Ag reement

53 1360 ( P11A, 87R2357)

< 300

< 350

-

-

Not Compa red

l

i

i

l

e

PDR

O

,

L

-

.

-_-

.

s

,

e

ENCLOSURE 2

-

Criteria for Comparing Analytical Measurements

This enclosure provides criteria for comparing results of capability tests and

verification measurenients. The criteria are based on an empirical relationship

which combines prior experience and the accuracy needs of this program.

In these criteria, the judgement limits denoting agreement or disagreement

between licensee and NRC results are viable. This variability is a function of

the NRC's value relative to its associated uncertainty, referred to in this

program as "Resolution"* increases, the range of acceptable differences between

the NRC and licensee values should be more restrictive.

Conversely, poorer

agreement between NRC and licensee values must be considered acceptable as the

resolution decreases.

For comparison purposes, a ratio of the licensee value to the NRC value for

2

each individual nuclide is computed.

This ratio is then evaluated for

agreement based on the calculated resolution. The corresponding resolution and

calculated ratios which denote agreement are listed in the Table below. Values

outside of the agreement ratios for a selected nuclide are considered in

disagreement.

2 Resolution = NRC Reference Value for a Particular Nuclide

Associated Uncertainty for the Value

"Comparison Ratio =

Licensee Value

N5C Reference Value

TABLE

Confirmatory Measurements Acceptance Criteria

Resolutions vs. Comparison Ratio

Comparison Ratio

for

Resolution

Agreement

< 4

0.4

- 2.5

4-

7

0.5 - 2.0

8-

15

0.6 - 1.66

16 - 50

0.75 - 1.33

51 - 200

0.80 - 1.R5,

>200

0.85 - 1.18

--

.

.

-

-

-

-

-