ML20197J545

Forwards Performance Enhancement Program Status Rept for Jan-Mar 1986,per 850529 SALP Meeting Commitment

ML20197J545
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date:	05/09/1986
From:	Brey H PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
To:	Berkow H Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
P-86357, TAC-60566, NUDOCS 8605200069
Download: ML20197J545 (24)

Text

- _

o

... s.~..

O PublicService~ Company of Colorado P.O. Box 840 Denver, CO 80201 - 0840 (303) 571 -7511 2420 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 100D, Denver, Colorado 80211 May 9, 1986 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-86357 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555 Attention: Mr. H. N. Berkow, Director Standardization and Special Projects Directorate Docket No. 50-267

SUBJECT:

Status Report-for Performance Enhancement Program

Dear Mr. Berkow:

Attached is the fourth Status Report for the Performance Enhancement Program. It covers the three-month time period from January 1, 1986 through March 31, 1986. The report documents the verbal status report to be given to you in Arlington, Texas, on May 9, 1986 by Mr.

R. F. Walker, President, Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division, Mr. Ted Willey of The Training Company, and Mr.

W. D. Rodgers, Manager, Performance Enhancement Program.

This letter is consistent with our commitment made in the May 29, 1985 SALP meeting and PSC will continue to provide progress reports on a quarterly basis if desired.

8605200069 860509 ob(

DR ADOCK05000g7

\

1

,P-86357 Pags 2 i May 9, 1986 l l

If you have any questions please contact Mr. W. D. Rodgers at (303) 480-6904.

Very truly yours, 1

II . L. Brey, Manager Nuclear Licensing and Fue:;s Division smc Attachment cc: K. Heitner, Fort St. Vrain Project Manager E. J. Butcher, Acting Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #3

= CRG-86-012 Public Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program Quarterly Status Report - As of March 31, 1986 This report documents the status of Public Service Company of Colorado's Performance Enhancement Program (PEP) and covers the three-month time period from January 5, 1986 through March 31, 1986.

This report has been compiled from status reports submitted monthly from each project manager. This is our fourth status report to the NRC regarding the PEP. We are a full year into this multi-year program.

Summary We have completed 17 of the 34 original projects and 18 of the current total of 43 projects. Forty-one project parts of eighty total project parts have also been completed. The primary emphasis in the PEP during the month has been on Project VII, Total Responsibility Management.

The following summarizes the status of the seven overall projects:

• Project I - Organizational Concerns Overall, six of eight projects are complete. Hiring of new personnel has remained static compared to last quarter. The remaining eight positions require experienced nuclear personnel and candidates are being sought through professional recruiters and additional advertising in industry publications.

• Project II - Master Planning and Scheduling One of three projects are complete. We are developing our long-range planning techniques in conjunction with the upcoming EQ outage. Planning and Scheduling within Quality Assurance and Nuclear Licensing and Fuels divisions is in place. A policy defining a priority system and criteria for assigning priorities is being approved and will soon be implemented. As of April 1, 1986, PSC created a Department Manager level position, Master Planning and Scheduling Manager. Mr. Duane Rodgers will fill this new position and will assume responsibility for the Performance Enhancement Program as a part of his duties.

• Project III Establish Preventive Planning and Maintenance Scheduling Progress on the maintenance planning and scheduling is accelerating now that the maintenance planning group is in place and initial training is complete. One of three projects in this overall project is complete. The new engineered PM procedures are just being issued and have yet to be integrated with maintenance planning and scheduling. An increased rate of progress is expected over the next several months in implementing the scheduling of preventive maintenance.

.

• Projcct IV - Upgreda Nuclerr Policica cnd Proceduras

-To-date, we have completed three of ten projects. Additionally, a key project part was completed in Project IV.4, Review

-Essential Regulatory Documents, which identified commitments from regulatory documents that had not previously been defined. This project responded to the management audit's concern that regulatory documents were not reviewed for regulatory intent relative to the HTGR technology.

• Project V -

Improve Management and Nuclear Division Personnel Training Training development continues to do well although some additional slippage in schedules has occurred. The three Operator positions' training materials are complete and INPO has completed its accreditation visit. We are expecting that these positions will soon receive INPO accreditation. Slippage is occurring in the Quality Assurance and Nuclear Engineering divisions for the development of their training programs.

• Project VI - Plant Conduct of Operations We have four of seven projects in this area complete. A contractor is now assisting us with implementation of Project VI.4, Implement Plant Signage Program.

• Project VII - Total Responsibility Management Development of this project has been a major effort during this quarter. Problem identification under Part 1 is complete. Under Part 2, working groups were established and are developing corrective action in the 11 areas requiring improvement. The final list of action items from the working group will be approved and prioritized by management.

Exhibit I is the summary schedule Bar Chart. This schedule is Part B of the Nuclear Master Schedule. It shows the original schedule and progress to date in summary form for each project. Also, Exhibit II is a more detailed schedule of Project V.7, Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation.

The remaining sections of this report describe progress of each project, work completed, and problems encountered.

Project Completions During the quarter, the following two projects were completed:

• Project II.1, Establish Maintenance Planning Group - D. Miller

• Project IV.6, Review and Revise Exclusion List and Related Procedures - T. Prenger

, Proirct Chrngna end Additiona The following changes and/or additions to the PEP have been made:

• Project IV.4, Review Essential Regulatory Documents, is being restructured to break the remaining work into more manageable pieces. Part 2, Define Additional Ongoing Obligations, is being split into two parts. The revised Part 2, Review Past Active Commitments for Passive Commitments, is scheduled for a July 10 completion. It will research references from historical active commitments made to the NRC and verify that passive commitments are included in the current catalog of passive commitments. Part 3, Review 10CFR and FSAR for Passive Commitments is expected to begin in June, 1986. It will research 10CFR and the FSV FSAR for additional obligations. The end result of this project will be a complete Passive Commitment Catalog.

• Project V.4, Improve Quality Assurance Division Training, has been restructured. Part 2, Implementation is being split into two parts. The revised Part 2, Implement Primary Courses includes those courses scheduled for development in 1986.

Part 3, Implement Secondary Courses, are those courses scheduled for 1987. Part 3, Implement Remaining Cources, includes the courses that do not have scheduled completions.

This restructuring also represents further slippage in the schedule of this project.

• Project V.6, Improve Licensing and Fuels Division Training, has also been restructured. Part 2, Implementation, is being broken into three parts. The division elected to evaluate the work of several contractors bidding on training development before awarding contracts for the remaining courses. The restructuring reflects this approach. The revised Part 2, Implement Initial Four Courses, is scheduled for a September 30, 1986 completion. Part 3 Implement Remaining Courses, is scheduled for year end. part 4, Develop NLF Training Procedures, is an increase in project scope.

Project V.10, Investigate Training Simulator, is new. We have work in progress to demonstrate our ability to simulate Helium Circulator and Auxilaries for one loop of a Fort St. Vrain specific control room simulator. Due to the importance of this work, the project is being monitored as a part of the PEP. We should have an Action Plan presentation to Management within three months.

Project VII, Total Responsibility Management has been renamed.

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCNEDULE StNetARY SCNEDULE BAR CRART EXNIBIT I

, PART 3: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: March 31, 1986

}

< PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1996 1987 PRO- NUS JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S 04 01 02 03 I. ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS i I.1 E.2 Formalise Action Plan, Beor- D. Picard Complete '

! ganisation and Performance l

Enhancement Program I.2 A.1 Document Charters, Missions and Function Statements Part 1, Develop Charters D. Picard Complete Part 2, Update Procedures D. Picard Complete I.3 A.9 Document Policy on Communi- M. Eachary Complete cation and Staff Meetings I.4 E.1 Evaluate Staffing Levels L. Brey Part 1, Evaluate and Approve Complete

} Staffing j Part 2, Nire New Personnel May 1 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFEEEEEEEE I

i 1.5 E.5 Complete Nuclear Production J. Gehm Complete Organisational Changes I.6 E.3 Evaluate Engineering and Warenbourg Complete E.4 Licensing and Fuels at Fort St. Vrain

! I.7 Complete Organisation D. Rodgers Decision Gride Part 1 - Implement Corporate Complete Grid Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nold FFFFFFFFEEEE Nuclear Decision Grida I.8 Evaluate Staff Retention D. Rodgers Complete II. MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING 21.1 A.2 Establish Nuclear Master D. Picard Complete Planning and Scheduling

] Function dk I

l l

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCHEDULE SUlelARY SCHEDULE BAR CHART EXMIBIT I PART 3: Performance Enhanceaant Program AS OF: March 31, 1906 i

PROJECT TIMETABLE i

' SCHEDULED 1986 1987 PRO- NUS

! J5CT REF. DESCRIPTI0tt RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S Q4 Q1 Q2 03 II.2 A.4 Develop Annual and Long- C. Fuller Range Schedules Part 1, Initial Schedule Complete Part 2, Complete Schedule Dependent-II.3 OXX (EST) XXX0 II.3 A.2 Implement Planning and Sche-j duling Methode & Procedures Part 1, Initial Definition D. Picard Complete Part 2, NED Implementation R. Craun Aug 5 Aug 15(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFKXXXEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Part 3, NLF Implementation R. Musted Complete FF Part 4, OA Implementation M. Ferris complete FFFFFF Part 5, NPD Implementation D. Miller Aug 5 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFKXXX III. ESTABLISH PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND Bunr.uGLING III.1 B.2 Establish Maintenance D. Miller Complete FFFFFFFF Planning Group III.2 B.3 Define Maintenance Planning D. Miller and Scheduling Function Part 1, Initial Definition Complete

, Part 2, Implementation Jul 15 Jun 20(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFEEEEEEEEEEE l

III.3 B.4 Develop Preventive Mainte- F. Novechek nance Engineering Program Part 1, Initial Definition Complete Part 2, PM Development, Aug 5 Apr IS(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFEE

Existing critical Signifi-

cant Componenta i Part 3, PM Development, Jan 2 Dec 31

- FFFXXXXXXXX3XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Remainder of Critical -

l Significant Components Part 4, Post Maintenance Complete

] Testing Procedure E

N I

I

li PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COIARADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCREDULE

SUMMARY

SCHEDULE BAR CHART

' EXNIBIT I PART Bs Performance Enhancement Program AS OF March 31, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABLE l SCHEDULED 1986 1997 JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSISLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S Q4 Q1 02 Q3 1 III.4 Evaluate Davis-Besse Event D. Rodgers Part 1 - Initial Review Complete Part 2 - Detail Evaluation Hold XXXXXXXXXXX3 IV. UPCRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 4

IV.1 B.1 Review and Revise Design J. Reesy Apr 1 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFEEEE A.5 Change Modification Process IV.2 C.1 Implement NRC Commitment D. Coss Complete Control Program IV.3 C.2 Document Procedures for D. Coos Complete Regulatory Correspondence Review

IV.4 C.3 Review Essential Regulatory J. Williams

) Documents Part 1, Review Essential Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Regulatory Documents Part 2, Review Past Active Feb 1 Jul 10 FFFFFFFFKXXXXXXXXXXXXX Commitments for Passive Cossiitaenta Part 3, Review 10CFR &

FSAR for Passive Com-Jun 1 (To be est.) XXXXX(EST)XXXXXXXXXX0 mitments IV.5 A.6 Review and Revise Nuclear Production Procedures

Part 1, Initial Definition C. Fuller Complete Part 2, Nuclear Production C. Fuller Jul 1 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFEEEEEE Procedures Development Part 3, Review and Revise C. Fuller Aug 2 Emergency Procedures Mar 31 87(R)FFFFFFFFXXX)KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.6 Review and Revise Exclusion T. Pronger Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF i

List and Related Procedures i

JL .

i PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCREDULE l

SUDetARY SCNEDULE BAR CHART EXNIBIT I PART Bs Performance Enhancement Prostram AS OFs March 31, 1986 l

PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULEn 19e6 19e7 PRO- NUS JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S 04 Q1 Q2 03 i

'!F IV.7 Revise Technical Specifi-i cations

) Part 1, Develop and Submit J. Gramling Apr 1 Aug 15 (R) FFFFXXXXXXXXEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

! for NRC Approval Part 2, Implement and C. Fuller Aug 16 (R) Next

'f Train at Plant Refueling X (EST)XXX0 i IV.8 Review and Revise Nuclear M. Daum Engineering Division Procedures Part 1, Revise Procedures May 1 Jul 31(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFPFFFEEEEEEEEEEEE l IV.9 Review and Revise Level I l Plant Procedures (P & G)

Part 1, Revise 'P' Procedure C. Fuller Sep 3 Jul 31

) Part 2, Revise 'C' Procedure F. Novachek Sep 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX t

Jul 31 FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX l IV.10 Review an'd Revise Level I M. Ferris Sep 3 Sep 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXEEEEEEEE l 04 Procedures (Q)

{ V. IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION PERSONNEL TRAINING V.1 A.3 Conduct Management skille M. McNulty Upgrade Part 1, Initial Definition Complete 1

' Part 2, Implementation of. Complete Core Courses I

V.2 A.10 Review Membership in L. Brey Complete Industry Organisations V.3 S.7 Enhance 10CFR50.59 Training Part 1, Conduct Training J. Johns Complete Part 2, Update Text Data D. Coos Apr 1 Dec 1 Base FFFFFFFFFFFFEXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 3, Train NED Personnel J. Johns Complete F V.4 D.1 Improve Quality Assurance M. Ferris D.2 Division Training D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete Part 2, Implement Primary Jun 3 Dec 06 FFFFFFFFFFEEsasssssssssssssssssssssssssa Courses Part 3, Implement Secondary Jan 87 Dec 07 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX0 Courses Part 4, Implement Remaining To be Established Jk Courses

. _ ~. . - - - . . - . - . . .. - _ . -- ._--__.-._- .~. - - - . -- . . . . .- _ . . . -

^t

• i l PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COfARADO NUr*f. Ram MASTER SCNEDULE lI SUnnARY SCuRDULE MAR CEART i

EXWIBIT I j PART 3: Performance Enhancement Proeren AS OFs March 31, 1996 4,

i PROJECT TIMETABLE j SCNEDULED 1986 1997

PRO- NUS

) JBCT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A N J J A S 04 01 02 03 7

] V.5 D.1 Improve Nuclear Engineering M. Deum

! D.2 Diviolon Training 1 D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete i

Part 2, Complete Procedure Oct 14 Jun 30 FFFFFFFFFFFF EXXXXXXXXXXX

! Lesson Plans Part 3, Job and Task Analysis Nov 4 Sep 30 FFFFtXXXXXXM EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 4, Implementation Oct 1 Oct 1988(Est) XXXXXX(BSTlXXXXXX0 V.6 D.1 Improve Licensing and Fuels R. Nuoted

, D.2 Diviolon Training

D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete l Part 2, Implement Initial Sep 2 Sep 30 FFFFFFFFFFFF KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX i Four Courses 1 Part 3, Implement Semain- May 1 Dec 31(R) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

{ ing Coursee Part 4, Develop NLF Mar 3 Jun 30 XXXMKXXXXXXXXXXX Training Procedures l

] V.7 D.1 Develop Nuclear Production T. Soret j D.2 Diviolon Training for INFO i

D.3 Accreditation .

l D.4 Part 1, Operator Accredita- Complete FFFF 1 tion Training '

Part 2, Non-Operator Accre- Jul 1 Dec 31 FFFFFFFFFFFFKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• l ditation Training i

l V.8 D.5 Consolidate Site Training T. Borst Complete

(

! V.9 D.6 Retrain Licensed Personnel T. Borat j Part 1, Training Program Complete j Development 4

1 Part 2, Conduct Training Oct 1(R) S*P 30 FFFFFFFFFFFFPFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX i

l V.10 Design and Implement S. W111 ford To be Established i

1 Training Simulator

, VI. PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS 1

i VI.1 A.8 Formalise Plant Tour Proco- C. Fuller -Complete i dures and Reporting VI.2 Devise conduct of Operations C. Fuller Complete I

j VI.3 Document Supervisor C. Fuller Complete

mesponsibilities Jk 4

PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NUCLEAR MASTER SCEEDULE

SUMMARY

SCHEDULE BAR CRART EXNIBIT I PART 3: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: March 31, 1996 PROJECT TIMETABLE SCHEDULED 1906 1997 PRO- NUS JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE START COMPLETE J F M A M J J A S Q4 Q1 02 03 qp -----

VI.4 Implement Plant Signage C. Fuller Feb 3 Jul 31 FFFFFFFF CXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Program VI.5 Complete Facilities F. Novachek Complete Planning Study VI.6 Improve Parts Management J. Reesy System Part 1, Initial Assessment Apr 1 Apr 15 (R) FFFFFFFFEEEEEE Part 2, Implementation Apr 15(R)Det. in X(EST)XXO Part 1

! VI.7 Establish Component Shelf-l Life Program i Part 1, Complete Aging M. Niehoff Complete FFFF 4

Study Part 2, Install Component J. Reesy Feb 3(R) May 31(R) FFFFXXXXEEEEEEEE Shelf-Life Program VII. TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY MANAGEMENT VII.1 Problem Identification, T. Willey Ownership and Action Planning i Part 1, Identification Complete FFFF of Probleme Part 2, Define Action Feb 15 Apr 15(R) FFFFX) KX Items Part 3, Develop Action Apr 15 May 31(R) XXXXXX Plans I

l EXMIBIT II Fublic Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program Project V.7 - Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation Percent Complete Schedule Project Timetable Anlys Desgn Devel Eval Start Submit Comp 1 1985 - 1986 Proj Description Sum Phase Phase Phase Phase SER SER(*) (f) M/J J/A S/O N/D J/F M/A M/J J/A S/O N/D

---q ----

Part 1 Operator Accreditation *

1. Non Licensed Reactor Operator 100 100 100 100 80 100 Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF i

• 0 1 2. Licensed Reactor Operator 100 300 100 100 80 100 Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

• 8

) 3. Senior Reactor Operator s 100 100 100 100 80 100 complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF 1

shift Supervisor

• 6 Part 2 Non-operator Accreditation 4 Chemistry Technician 50 100 8 25 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• 8

5. Electrical Maintenance Personnel 22 60 10 15 80 70 1/85 5/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• 8

6. Mechanical Maintenance Personnel 61 99 15 26 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX e g

7. Technical Advisors 25 50 15 30 80 70 12/84 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• 0

8. Instrument Technician 70 95 38 38 80 70 3/85 9/06 12/96 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• 8

9. Radiological Protection Tech. 62 100 7 33 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• f

10. Technical Staff & Managers 42 67 7 25 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7FFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

• . f i

Mk 1

(1) Notes Schedule is for submitting the Self Evaluation Report (SER) to INPO and implementing the training programa at PSC

- not for achieving INPO Board Accreditation.

1

. PROJECT I - ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS

~~

PROJECT I.1 - FORMALIZE ACTION PLAN, REORGANIZATION AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT I.2 -

DOCUMENT CHARTERS, MISSION AND FUNCTION STATEMENTS -

Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT I. 3 - DOCUMENT POISCY ON COMMUNICATIONS AND STAFF MEETINGS -

Mike Zachary - Complete PROJECT I.4 - EVALUATE STAFFING LEVELS - Larry Brey Part 1 - Evaluate and Approve Staffing - Complete Part 2 - Hire New Personnel

1. The status of the new positions is as follows:

a. 5 of 5 filled in QA.

b. 43 of 46 filled in NPD.

c. 5 of 9 filled in NLF.

d. 16 of 17 filled in NED, 18th requisition was cancelle,d.

e. 1 of 1 filled in Administration.

'f . 70 of 78 filled in total or 90 percent.

2. The actual number of people hired for the PEP has not changed but these counts show an adjustment due to a reporting error.

3. Overall, there are approximately 24 positions open. Eight of these are from the original seventy-eight approved in this project.

PROJECT I.5 -

COMPLETE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES -

Jack Gahm - Complete PROJECT I.6 -

EVALUATE ENGINEERING AND LICENSING AND FUELS AT FORT ST. VRAIN - Don Warembourg - Complete PROJECT I.7 - COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION GRIDS - Duane Rodgers Part 1 - Implement Corporate Grid - Complete Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nuclear Decision Grids - Hold

1. Only limited progress during the quarter.

2. Project has been placed on hold until after EQ.

PROJECT I.8 - EVALUATE STAFF RETENTION - Duane Rodgers - Complete

. PROJECT TI - MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING PROJECT II.1 -

ESTABLISH NUCLEAR MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING -

Doug Picard - Complete PROJECT II.2 - DEVELOP ANNUAL AND LONG-RANGE SCHEDULES - Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Schedule - Complete PROJECT II.3 -

IMPLEMENT PLANNING AND SCHEDULING METHODS AND PROCEDURES - Doug Picard Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - NED Implementation - R. Craun

1. Superproject has been selected as the PC-based scheduling system (PREMIS is the mainframe system). The PC software is being acquired.

2. The manhour collection system has been implemented for NED-Site. This system, although being used by NED-Site, is still being debugged. The completion of output reports by systems personnel is being delayed by other higher priority work.

3. A procedure to process and estimate AR's, CN's, TCR's has been prepared with the exception of the areas dealing with a new priority system.

Part 3 - NLF Implementation - R. Husted - Complete

1. In January, the divisional procedure for planning and schedul!ng was issued and training conducted. This project part is .aw complete.

P, 5 t 4 - QA I.aplementation - M. Ferris - Complete

1. The first QA schedule was issued in January.

2. Training in the planning and scheduling procedures was conducted in February.. This project part is now complete.

Part 5 - NPD Implementation - D. Miller

1. Progress is accelerating now that the staff organization is in place and initial training has been accomplished.

2. We are using long-range planning techniques for the upcoming EQ outage. The procedures should be well defined and tested for the next refueling outage.

PROJECT III - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING PROJECT III.1 - ESTABLISH MAINTENANCE PLANNING GROUP - Dave Miller -

Complete

1. Hiring and initial staff training are complete. This project is now complete.

PROJECT III.2 - DEFINE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING FUNCTION -

Dave Miller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation

1. Progress is accelerating now that the staff organization is in place and initial training has been accomplished.

PROJECT III.3 - DEVELOP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING PROGRAM -

Frank Novachek Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - PM Development, Existing Critical Significant Components

1. Additional support has been obtained to prevent slippage as a result of EQ activities.

2. This project part now includes only 191 procedures - reduced from 351. Sixty-nine procedures are transferred to Part 3, PM Development -

Remainder of Critical Significant Components, and 91 have been cancelled due to duplication and redundancy.

3. Of the 191 procedures, 86 have been issued and 105 are in the review and approval cycle.

4. The 69 procedures transferred to Part 3, PM Development Remainder of Critical Significant Components was because insufficient supporting information (controlled or non-controlled) was available to justify their use as originally written.

5. Completion of this part has been extended to April 15.

Part 3 -

PM Development, Remainder of Critical Significant Components

1. There are now over 400 procedures being addressed in this project part, including the procedures that were transferred from Part 2, PM Development - Existing Critical Significant Components. To-date, 15 procedures have been issued and 15 more are in development.

Part 4 - Post Maintenance Testing Procedure - Complete Project III.4 - Evaluate Davis-Besse Event - D. Rodgers

, P2rt 1'- Initial Rtvicw - Complets Part 2 - Detail Evaluation - Hold

1. EQ has had a negative impact on progress. Action Plans are being developed. A completion date for the project cannot be established until the Action Plans are compiled.

2. Project has been placed in hold status until after EQ.

. PROJECT IV - UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PROJECT IV.1 - REVIEW AND REVISE DESIGN CHANGE MODIFICATION PROCESS -

Jack Reesy

1. Final comments have been received on the new ED-100, CN Preparation and Document Control and ENG-1, Control of Modifications and Documentation Changes. These are now being routed for final approval and issue.

2. Licensing has determined that the FSAR must be revised and written approval received from the NRC before the DCN (Document Change Notice) process can be implemented for safety-related design documents.

3. The tasks remaining in this project need to be identified.

Two known tasks remaining are training and approval of the F3AR change referenced above.

PROJECT IV.2 -

IMPLEMENT COMMITMENT CONTROL PROGRAM - Dave Goss -

Complete PROJECT IV.3 -

DOCUMENT PROCEDURES FOR REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW - Dave Goss - Complete PROJECT IV.4 - REVIEW ESSENTIAL REGULATORY DOCUMENTS - Jack Williams Part 1 - Review Essential Regulatory Documents - Complete

1. The final eight passive commitments needing sign-off by the responsible department is now complete.

2. The QA Section of the Passive Commitment Catalog was completed in February.

1

3. This project part is now cosplete.

Part 2 - Review Past Active Commitments for Passive Commitments

1. Some difficulty was encountered in the assembly of past correspondence from the STAIRS correspondence database. This has been resolved by using ATMS (word processing) files instead of STAIRS. Schedule impact is not expected.

2. The correspondence relating to past commitments is being assembled. The correspondence is being reviewed and passive commitments documented.

3. A tape from Louisiana Power and Light has been received. It contains light water reactor 10CFR passive commitments. We are evaluating this information for use in Part 3, Review FSAR and 10CFR for Passive Commitments. We hope to use the light water commitments as a basis for defining HTGR passive commitments.

. PROJECT IV.5 -

REVIEW AND REVISE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION PROCEDURES -

Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Definition'- Complete Part 2 - Nuclear Production Procedures Development

1. All 58 System Operating Procedures (SOP's) are in the revision process - 51 are being walked-down by Operations and the remainder in various stages of revision. Operators have had to make extensive.revisi,ons to the initial drafts. To date, no procedures have been issued for this rewrite effort.

2. All 464 results procedures '

have been rewritten. Approximately 68% have been. issued.

s Part 3 - Review-and Revise Emergency Procedures

1. This project is being bid. All bids have been received and final selection is waiting management approval.

^

PROJECT IV.6 -

REVIEW AND REVISE EXCLUSION LIST AND RELATED PROCEDURES - Tim Prenger - Complete

1. The new procedure Q-4, Procurement System, has been issued and the exclusion list has been eliminated. This project is now complete.

PROJECT IV.7 - REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS - Jim Gramling

, ,Part 1 - Develop and Submit for NRC Approval

l. Technical Spe'cifications for helium circulators, steam generators, and PCRV liner cooling system were revised and submitted. to the NRC. This submittal addresses concepts that affect the entire upgrade program.

2. The Significant Hazards Analysis is still in process.

3. Justification for the criteria for redundancy in safe shutdown cooling systems was submitted to NRC.

4. New specifications for station batteries need to be developed based upon NRC questions.

5. Responses to NRC reviewer questions regarding diesel generator surveillance practices and spent fuel storage facility ventilation were prepared.

6. NRC comments on November 30 Final Draft have not been received as expected by January 31.

PROJECT IV.8 - REVIEW AND REVISE ENGINEERING PROCEDURES - Mike Daum I

5

. Pnrt 1 - R7vico Procnduran

1. All ENG and STD procedures have been revised. The CWP Manual is the remaining procedure requiring revision.

2. The CWP Manual will be replaced with two Site Engineering Manager Administrative Procedures (SEMAP's). Issuing these procedures is contingent on revisions to Level I procedure G-9, Controlled Work Procedures.

PROJECT IV.9 - REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I PLANT PROCEDURES (P & G) -

Jack Gahm Part 1 - Revise 'P' Procedures - Chuck Fuller

1. Four of nine P procedures are complete. All others are on schedule.

2. A concern was expressed that other concurrent efforts to revise procedures are not well coordinated with this project.

For example, some of these procedures must be revised for EQ.

Part 2 - Revise 'G' Procedures - Frank Novachek

1. All 14 are in the revision process. One is complete and ready for review, approval, and reissue.

PROJECT IV.10 -

REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES - Mike Ferris

1. Four of nineteen procedures are complete and have been issued.

Five other procedures are in various stages of development.

2. The completion date has been extended to September 30, 1986 from July 31, 1986.

. PROJECT V - IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION TRAINING PROJECT V.1 -

CONDUCT MANAGEMENT SKILLS UPGRADE - Martin McNulty -

Complete PROJECT V.2 -

REVIEW MEMBERSHIP IN INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS - Larry Brey - Complete PRpTECT V.3 - ENHANCE 10CFR50.59 TRAINING - Mike Holmes Part 1 - Conduct Training - Jeff Johns - Complete Part 2 - Update Text Data Base - Dave Goss

1. The additional 'G' letters (104 that were never received by PSC) have now been input.

2. The scope of this project has been expanded to include correspondence from 1968-1980 such as NRC correspondence not sent to PSC, documents received from NRC but not input, and

'P' letters not input. Older correspondence will also be numbered with the P and G system now in place. Project duration is not expected to change as a result of this additional work.

Part 3 - Train NED Personnel - Jeff Johns - Complete

1. This project part was completed in January. Training was given to the Electrical section of NED Nuclear Design, and Special Projects and Nuclear Site Engineering departments.

PROJECT V.4 -

IMPROVE QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION TRAINING - Mike Ferris Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation

1. This project part is being split into three parts. One part will be courses scheduled for completion in 1986, a second part is those scheduled for 1987 and a third part is for those courses not yet scheduled. This represents further slippage of this schedule.

2. Progress has been limited due to QA training personnel's involvement in EQ and other activities.

PROJECT V.5 -

IMPROVE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAINING - Mike Daum Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Complete Procedure Training Lesson Plans

1. Six of seventeen procedure training lesson plans are complete.

All others are in process.

2. S varcl rush loc 2on plcns that cro required for EQ hcvs rcduc;d attrntion to plcnntd cctivitico.

Part 3 - Job and Task Analysis

1. This project was showing good progress through January. Since then, progress has been hindered by rush lesson planc and related training required for EQ. Emphasis has been placed on procedural training rather than technical training in the last few months.

PROJECT V.6 - IMPROVE LICENSING AND FUELS TRAINING - Bob Husted Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete The approach to this project has been revised. In the bid evaluation and selection process, PSC elected to evaluate the performance of several contractors and complete the first four courses before proceeding to the remaining courses. Part 2, Implement Initial Four Courses is scheduled for completion September 30, 1986 and Part 3, Implement Remaining courses is now scheduled for a year-end completion. Additionally, Part 4, Develop NLF Training Procedures, is an expansion of project scope to address divisional training procedures.

Part 2 - Implement Initial Four Courses

1. A new training engineer has been hired in the division.

2. Contracts have been awarded for the initial four courses.

Part 4 - Develop NLF Training Procedures

1. Progress is limited since project has just begun.

PROJECT V.7 - DEVELOP NUCLEAR PRODUCTION DIVISION TRAINING FOR INPO ACCREDITATION - Ted Borst Part 1 - Operator Accreditation Training - Complete

1. Two more operator positions were completed in January. The project part is now complete.

2. INPO visited Fort St. Vrain in mid-March to review the three positions for accreditation. We are waiting the results of this visit.

Part 2 - Non Operator Accreditation

1. Work has continued on most of the seven positions with the exception of Electrical Maintenance. EQ has impacted progress on the Electrical Maintenance position.

2. The development of these courses is on schedule although in previous reporting periods the project was ahead of ' schedule.

PROJECT V.8 - CONSOLIDATE SITE TRAINING - Ted Borst - Complete

. PROJECT V.9 - RETRAIN LICENSED PERSONNEL - Tsd Borat Part 1 - Training Program Development - Complete Part 2 - Conduct Training

1. The sixth rotation is nearly complete. Overall, the retraining is 71% completo.

PROJECT V.10 - INVESTIGATE TRAINING SIMULATOR - S. Wilford

1. This is a new project that will address the development of a plant-specific control room simulator for Fort St. Vrain. A prototype of System 21 (Helium Circulators) has been developed and has been very effectively utilized in operator training.

An Action Plan and schedule is being prepared.

. PROJECT VI - PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS PROJECT V.I.1 - FORMALIZE PLANT TOUR PROCEDURES AND REPORTING - Chuck Fuller - Ct,mplete PROJECT VI.2 -

REVISE CONDUCT OF PLANT OPERATIONS - Chuck Fuller -

Complete PROJECT VI.3 - DOCUMENT SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES - Chuck Fuller -

Complete PROJECT VI.4 - IMPLEMENT PLANT SIGNAGE PROGRAM - Chuck Fuller

1. This project has been taken out of " hold" status and has been restarted. There are approximately 6,000 signs included in the scope of the project.

2. Proto-Power Management has been selected for the work.

Contractor personnel began in February. Expected Completion is July 31, 1986.

PROJECT VI.5 - COMPLETE FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY - Frank Novachek -

Complete PROJECT VI.6 - IMPROVE PARTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Jack Reesy Part 1 - Initial Assessment

1. New procedures are being issued that when issued, should complete this project.

PROJECT VI.7 -

ESTABLISH COMPONENT SHELF-LIFE PROGRAM - Jack Reesy/ Mike Niehoff Part 1 - Complete Aging Study - Mike Niehoff - Complete

1. The Sargent & Lundy aging study is complete.

Part 2 - Install Component Shelf-Life Program - Jack Reesy

1. The aging results are being reviewed to determine life information. This information will be analyzed to establish shelf-life in a mild environment.

, PROJECT VII - TOTAL RESPONSIBILITY MANAGEMENT PROJECT VII.1 - PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION, OWNERSHIP AND ACTION PLANNING

- T. Willey Development of this new project has been our major emphasis during the last month of the quarter. This project is divided into five phases or parts:

Part 1 - Problem Identification and Ownership (Identify Problems / Issues, Consolidate into Workable Areas)

Part 2 - Action Planning (Problem Resolutions and Formulation of Proposed Actions that Should be Considered)

Part 3 - Action Plan Development / Implementation (Review All Proposed Action Plans from Part 2, Select Appropriate Plans, Develop Overall Implementation Program)

Part 4 - Systems Assessment (Develop and Implement Methods to Assess Effectiveness of Implemented Action Plans)

Part 5 - Final Report (To Include Recommendations for Continuing Activities)

Part 1 - Problem Identification - Complete Eighteen meetings were held with groups of employees. These groups were made up of a cross section of employees from Division Managers to Union employees. The purpose of the meetings was to identify problem areas for further investigation. A total of 11 Areas of Concern were identified for further action. Part 1. of Project VII, Total Responsibility Management, is now complete.

Part 2 - Action Planning Seperate Task Groups of seven to fourteen were appointed to study each of the 11 Areas of Concern. A total of 39 group meetings were held to further define each problem area and to propose solutions to these problems for action by PSC management under Part 3 of the project. Part 2 is approximately 75% complete.