ML20137M103

Performance Enhancement Program Status Rept - as of 860103

ML20137M103
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date:	01/15/1986
From:	PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
To:
Shared Package
ML20137M100	List: ML20137M096 ML20137M103 ML20137M125
References
CRG-86-002, CRG-86-2, TAC-60566, TAC-62169, NUDOCS 8601280192
Download: ML20137M103 (25)

Text

i -

0 Appendix A

\\

CRG-86-002 Public Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program Status Report - As of January 3, 1986 This report documents the status of Public Service Company of Colorado's Perfo rmance Enhancement Program (PEP) and covers the three-month time period from October 1, 1985 through January 3, 1986.

The report has been compiled from status reports submitted monthly from each project manager.

This is our third status report to the NRC regarding the PEP.

SUMMARY

We'have completed five more projects this quarter.

To date, we have completed 15 of the 34 original projects and 16 of the current total of 42 projects.. Thirty-two project parts of seventy-two total project parts have also been completed.

We are nine months into a multi-year program.

The followling summarizes -the status of the six overall-projects:

Project I - Organizational Concerns

Overall, 6

of the 8 projects are complete.

The two remaining projects are Project I.4, Evaluate Staffing

Levels, Part

'2, Hire New Personnel and Project I.7, Complete Organization Decision Grids, Part 2, Develop and Implement Nuclear Decision Grics.

The hiring has become more. difficult for the last seven positions.

Four of these are experienced positions in Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division.

Employee Relations will again be placing notices in industry magazines for these positions.

Hiring for these positions will most likely require through February.

The decision grid project is scheduled for completion January 31.

By next quarter's status, we anticipate having all of the original six projects in this area complete.

Project II - Master Planning and Scheduling One of three projects are. complete with two other project parts complete.- A Nuclear Master Schedule has been issued.

It is usually issued at the beginning of each month and presently shows ' key Environmental Qualification- (EQ) and other plant start-up actions, as well as the Outage Schedule 'for 9601280192 660',15 PDR.ADOCK N000267 G.

PM

~

the next five years.

Plant design changes will be incorporated into the Master Schedule when the divisional planning and scheduling functions' implementation is further along.

We are making better progress on the implementation of each division's planning and scheduling function.

Quality Assurance and Nuclear Licensing and Fuels are expected to complete implementation within the next month.

Project III Estabiish Preventive Maintenance Planning and Scheduling Progress on maintenance planning _and scheduling has been limited due to delays in hiring personnel and required dedication of staff to EQ.

Schedulers have been assigned to EQ for 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage.

The revision of maintenance procedures is doing well, but the review and approval cycle is still requiring longer. than planned.

Consequently, revisions to existing procedures will not be fully issued until March 1, 1986.

Project IV - Upgrade Nuclear Policies and Procedures To

date, we have completed two of the ten projects.

The two complete were finished in December.

Most of these projects are broad in scope and long-term in nature.

Project IV.6, Review and Revise Exclusion List and Related Procedures, has been the tail

" wagged" by other efforts to revise procurement procedures.

Better progress on procurement has been shown in the last month and the current procurement proposal would eliminate the Exclusion List entirely.

Project V

- Improve Management and Nuclear Division Personnel Training Training ~ development continues to do well.

Three of nine projects are complete with nine of nineteen project parts complete.

Most of these projects are long-term in nature with several projects extending into 1987 and beyond.

The development of Operator training materials (for INPO accreditation) is nearly complete.

Completion has been delayed by one month.

Approximately 103 man-months of effort were expended during 1985 for accreditation.

Project VI - Plant Conduct of Operations To

date, four of seven projects in this area are complete.

A fifth project (Project VI.4, Implement Plant Signage Program) is on hold until adequate resources are available.

The project to-improve parts management is making better progress.

A new,

~

\\

Level I procedure has been drafted which proposes a

new procurement system.

The shelf-life program has been delayed by problems encountered in completing and analyzing aging data.

Exhibit I is the Summary Schedule Bar Chart.

This schedule is Part B of the Nuclear Master Schedule.

It shows the original schedule and progress to date in summary form for each project.

Also, Exhibit II,.is a more detailed schedule of Project V.7, Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation.

The remaining sections of this report describe the progress of each project, work completed, and problems encountered.

Project Completions During the

quarter, the following five projects were completed:

Project I.8, Evaluate Staff Retention Mr.

D.

Rodgers, Project II.1, Establish Nuclear Master Planning and Scheduling Function - Mr.

D.

Picard, Project IV.2, Implement NRC Commitment Control Program - Mr.

D.

Goss, Project IV.3, Document Procedures for Regulatory Correspondence Review - Mr.

D.

Goss, Project V.1, Conduct Management Skills Upgrade - Mr.

M.

McNulty.

Project Changes and/or. Additions to Program The following changes and/or additions have been made:

Project II.4, Evaluate MP&S for Fossil, has been removed from the PEP.

It will, however, be ~ included on the Master Schedule.

Project III.3, Develop Preventive Maintenance Revise Maintenance Engineering Program, Part 5

Procedures, has been deleted as a project part and included with Part 2,

FM Development Existing Critical Significant Componento, of this project.

The existing maintenance procedures are being rewritten as both preventive maintenance and corrective maintenance procedures.

This e f fort was being tracked twice. l

-n

,m

Project III.4, Evaluate Davis-Besse Event, has been expanded based upon the completion of Part 1, Initial Review.

Ten action items have been defined and assigned to various individuals within the nuclear organization as Part 2, Detail Evaluation.

Action plans are being prepared to identify tasks and time frames for Part 2 from which an overall schedule will be prepared.

Project V.1, Conduct-Management Skills Upgrade has been modified.

Part 2, Implementation was changed to include only generic or core courses applicable to most managers.

The individual needs of each manager will be tracked by corporate training and not in this project.

This project is also complete.

Project V.5, Improve Nuclear Engineering Division Training has been redefined based upon the completion of Part 1, Initial Definition.

The revised schedule for implementation indicates implementation of.the training program in late 1988 or mid 1989.

The implementation plan is described in the detail status for the project.

An entirely new overall. project has been added to Project address the various human resource issues

VII, Morale and Human Productivity Management.

The project is open ended at this point.

It includes one project to initially define and identify the issues.

PSC has engaged the services of The Training Company and Mr.

Ted Willey to assist with the initial project.

As a

result of Project VII.1, Problem Identification, Ownership and Action Planning, new projects will be identified and assigned.

This project begins January 2 and should require through February 28.

.l l

l.

I

Appenslax A Exhibit i PliHl.IC SFPVICK COMPANY OF COLORADO NUCI.FAR MASTI P SClf EDill F SilMMAHY SC H VDt 's.I: HAH CitAldT PART D: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF January 3, 1986 PRO.IECT TIMI' TABLE SCitEDULED 1985 1996 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF.

DFSCRIPTION hESPONSIDIF START COMPI.ETE O

N D

J F

M A

M J

03 04 01 02

~

'I f I.

ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS I.!

E.2 Formalize Action Plan, Meor-D.

Pacard Complete qanizat son and Pe.r f ormance W

Enhancement Program XXX

= Schabled Tusetable I.2 A.I Document Charters, Missions and Function Statcaenta XXX0 = Schedsled Timetable Part 1,

Develop Charters D.

Picaid Complete wnth undefined cran-Part 2 Ugxia t e Procedures D.

Picaril Complete pletica date FM = Fantahed wrk within 1.3 A.9 Document Policy on Commun -

M.

Zachary Complete this sche & ale cataan and Staff Meetings XXII = Extended schedule I.4 E.1 Evaluate Statfing Levels C. Caudteau beyormi orpginal tame-Part 1 Fvaluate and Approve Complete table Staffang XX--

= Schedule has float time Part 2,

litre New Personne' May i Feb 281H)

FFFFFFFFFfTI F FEEEt:t:F to meet oraginal schedule Projects starts or finishes I.5 E.6 Complete Nuclear Production J.

G.s h m Complete later or earlter than OrganirationaI Changes planned.

I.6 E.3 Evaluate Engineering and Wasembourg Complete E.4 Licensing and Fuels at Fort St. Vraan 1.7 Complete Organization D.

Picard Decision Grads Part I - Implement Corpor. ate Complete FF Grad Part ? - Develop and Implement Sep 3 Jan ll(H)

FFFFFITFFFFF EFEE Nuclear Decision Grads I.8 Evaluate St a f f He t e.nt s on D.

Henige r s Ce >mp l e t e FFFFFtTlif II.

MASTFR 01 A,NN I NG AND SClit.DUI ! NC.

Is.1 A./

r e....ta li No.i ar M et,,

D.

Picar.:

r.+plete rrrr Pl.insianq inal Sche.lial s sig dk t'unc t s e.si

~-

Appendix A Exhibit 1 PUDLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORA!M)

NUCl. EAR MASTER SCHEDUI.E

SUMMARY

SCllEDULE HAR CHART PART B: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF January 3, 1986 PROJECT TIMETADLE SCHEDULED 1985 1986 1997 PRO-NUS JECT REF.

DESCRIPTION R ES PONS I DI.E START COMPLETE O

N D

J F

M A

M J

03 04 01 02 II.2 A.4 Develop Annu.st and Long-C.

Fuller Range Schedules Part I,

Initial Schedule Complete P.i r t 2,

Complete Schedule Depen < tent-II.3 OXXIFSTlXXXD 11.3 A.2 Implement Planning and Sche-duling Methods & Procedurer, Part I,

Inittal Definitinn D.

Picard Complete Part 2,

NED Implementatnon R.

Craun Aieg 5

Apr 19 8 t>

FFFFD FFFFF)r.1XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 3,

NLF Implementatson R.

Husted Sep 30 J in 15 1986 FITFFFFFFITt XX Pa-t 4, OA Implementatann M.

Ferras Aug 5 Jan 15 l'886 FFFFf fTFF FF) XX Past 5, NPD Implementatson D. Maller Auo 5 Apr 19 8 fi FFFFFFFFFFFF XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX III. ESTARLISH PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCiiEBUITs F III.I 16. 2 Establish Maintenance

.D.

Miller Apr i J.s n 151R)

FFFFFFFFFFil FE Planning Group III.2 8.3 Defane Maintenance Planning D.

Miller and Schedulang Function Part I,

Instaal Definition ca.mplete Part 2 Implement.ition Jul 15 Jun 2 0 1441 FFFFFFFFFFX) XXEEEEEEEEEEEFEEFFFEEE III.3 B.4 Develop Preventive Mainte-F.

Novachek nance Engineering Program Part I,

Instaal Definition Complete Part 2 PM Development.

Aug 5 Mar iIRB FfTFFFFFFFf4 EEEEEEFE Existing Critscal Sngnifi-cant Components Part 3, PM Development, Jan 1986 Dec 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Remainder of Critical Significant components Part 4,

Post Maintenance Complete Testang Procedure db

~ _

Appenfix A Exhibit 1 PURI.lO SERVICE COMPANY OF COf.ORADO NUC1. EAR MASTER SCHEDillE

SUMMARY

SCHFDtit.E BAR CHART PART 8: Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: January 3, 1986 PROJECT TIMETABl.E ScalEDut.ED 1985 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF.

DFSCRIPTION R ES PONS I Hi l' START COMPl.ETE O

N D

J F

M A

M J

03 04 01 02

__ y III.4 Evaluate Davis-Hesse Event D.

Picard Part 1 - Initial Review Complete iTITFFF FtTi i Part 2 - Detail Esaluatson Jan 5 To be Fst.

NXXX(ESTlMXXXXXX0 IV.

UPGRADE NUCl. EAR Pol.ICIES AND PROCEDURES IV.!

B.!

Review and Revise Dessgn J.

Reesy Apr l' Jan 15 (R)

Ft FtTI FFXXXN EE A.5 Change Modificatnon Process IV.2 C.1 Implement NRC Commitment D.

Goss Complete FFITFFFFFFFI Control Program j

IV.3 C.2 Document Procedures for D.

Cons Complete FFFFFFFFFFFI' Regulatory Correspondence Review IV.4 C.3 Review Essential Regulatory D. Coss Documents Part 1,

Review rssential May I Jan 15 (R)

FFFFFFFFFf71' FE Regulatory Document s KXXXXXXXXX(EST)XXXXXXXXXX0 Part 2, Define Adelational On-Jan 5 Jul 1986 going Obligations IV.5 A.6 Review and Revise Nuclear Production Procedures Part 1,

Initial Definition' C.

Fuller Complete Part 2. Nuclear Production C.

Fuller Jul !

Apr 30(R)

FFFFFFFFFFFF EEEEEEEEEEEEEEFE Procedures Development Part 3, Review and Revise C.

Fuller Auq 2 Mar 31 87(R)FFXXXXXXXXXN EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Emergency Procedures 4

IV.6 Revsew and Revise Exclusion T. Prenger Apr 1 Jan 31 (Ill FFFFFFFFFFFFEEEE List and Related Procedures IV.7 Revise Technical Specifi-cations Part

1. Develop and Submit. J. Gramling Apr 1 Apr 30(R)

FFFFFFFTFFVf KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for NRC Approv.nl XXXXXXXlEfiTlXXXXXXXXXXX0 l' art 2,

Implement.ind C. Fuller May I (R) Next y

Tsann at P l.in e Refueling

Appendia A Exhibit i PuHLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO NtlCI. EAR MASTER SCHEDt)I.E

SUMMARY

SCHEDULF HAR CHART PACT B: Perform 4:nce Enhancement Program AS OF: January 3, 1996 PROJECT TIMETARLE SCHEDULED 1985 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF.

DESCRIPTION RESPONSIHLE START COMPI.ETE O

N D'

J F

M A

M

.1 03 04 01 02 q

IV 8 Review and Revase Nuclear M.

Daum Engineerang Divirson Procedures P.i r t I,

Revise Psocedures May 1 Apr 1984.

FFFFFFFfFFFF FFFFXXXXXXXXXXX IV.9 Revaew and Revine Level I Plant Procedures (P 6 C. I Part I,

Revise

'P' Procedure C.

Fuller Sep 3

.s u l 1986 Fri tTFFFFFFt XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 2,

Revise

'G' Procedure l'. Novachek Sep 3

.f u l 19H6 FFFFFFFFtTX N XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.10 Rev aew and Revisie I.evel I M.

Ferras Sep 3

.f u l 1986 FFFFFFFFTITrXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX OA Procedures 40)

V.

IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NilCI.FAR DIVISION PERSONNEL TRAINING V.I A3 Conduct Management Sk a 11 ft.

M.

McNulty Upgrade Part I,

Insttal Detanatson Complete Part 2 Implementation of Complete FFFFFFFFfTF1 Core Courses V.2 A.10 Review Menteerrahap in I.. Hrey Complete Industry Organizatsonn V.3 p.7 Enhance 10CFR50.59 Traasinng Past I, Conduct Training

.1.

Johns Complete Part

2. Update Text Data D.

Goss Apr !

De r-1986 FIFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Base Part 3, Train NED Personnel J.

Johns Sep 3

.l a n 10lR1 FFFFFFFFFFFF E V.4 D.I improve Quality Assurance M.

Ferras D.2 Davtston Training D.4 Part 1 Instaal Definstson Complete Part 2 Implementatson Jun 3

, Sep 19861R) FFFFFFfTFFFF EEEEEEEEEEEEEEFFEEEEEEEEEEE V.S D.I Impr ove Nuclear Fngtneering M.

Daum D.2 Divasson Trainsnq D.4 l' art I,

In st eal De f init aon Complete Part 2, Complete l>sseredurn Oct 14 Jun 1986 FFFFFFFtTt 4XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Leshon Plases Part I,

.I s.l e arid Task Ana l y n a r6 Nov 4 Sog. 198h.

FtfTXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX l'e s t 4,

Implement at s ort akt 1986 Oct 19888Estl XXXXXX(EST)XXXXXX0

Appendax A Exh ilis t I PUBl.IC SERVICE COMPANY alf COI.OPADO NUCl. EAR MASTI:H bFilEDUI.F

SUMMARY

SCHEDHl.F PAR CitAt:T PADT at:

Performance Enhancement Program AS OF: January 3, 1986 PROJECT TIMETARI.E

- SCilEDUI.Ela 1985 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF.

DESCRIPTION RESPONS!Hl.E START COMPl.ETE O

N O

.I F

M A

M J

Q)

Q4 Ol 02

_ q V.0 D.I Improve I.icensing and Fuels R.

Ilu s t ed D.2 Division Training D.4 Part I,

initial Defination Complete Part 2,

implementatson Sep 2 Sep 30 1986 FFFTFFFFXXXN XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX V.7 D.!

Develop Nuclear Productson T.

Porst D.2 Davisson Traanang for INPO D.)

Accreditatson-D.4 Part I, Operator Accredita-Apr !

Jan ll IH) FitFFFFFFFFFF:FEL:

tion Traanang Part 2, Non-Opetator Accre-Jul I Dec 198 t>

FFFFFFFFFFFI FITFX X XXX X X F X X XX X X X XXX XXXXX XX XX X X datatnon Trainang V.R D.5 Consoladate Site Traanang T.

Borst Complete V.9 D.6 Retrain.1.icensed Personnel T.

Horst Part 1 Training Program Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Development Part 2, Conduct Training Oct IIH) Sep 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFI'FTFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX VI.

Pl. ANT CONDUCT OF UPERATIONS VI !

A.8 Formatare Plant Tour Proce-C.

Fuller Complete dures and Reportang VI.2 Revise Conduct of Operations C. Fuller Complete VI.3 Document Supervasor C.

Fuller Complete Responsabilitles VI.4 Implement Plant Signage C.

Fuller Hold OXXXXXXXXXXXX0 Program VI.5 Complete Facalitsee F.

Novachek Complete Plannang Study.

VI.6 Improve Parts Management J.

Reesy System Part I,

initial Ans.essment Apr 1

.I.a n 15tpl FFFFFFFFFFF! FE Part 2, implementation Jan 15 Determaned XIEST)XX0 4p Part I

S Appenclix'A Exhibit !

Pilfil.IC SERVICE COMPANY OF Col.ORADO NUCl. EAR MASTER SClit.DHI E SUMMAltY SCilEDHl.E DAte CHANT I

PART B: Performance Enhancement Prosaram AS OF January 3, 19M PROJECT TIMETABLE.

SCHEDULED 1985 1986 1987 PRO-NUS JECT REF.

DESCHIPTION RESPONSlHLE STANT COMPI.ETE O

N D

J P

M A

M J

Q3 Q4 Q1 02

--q7 VI.7 Establish Component Shelf-Life Program Part I, Complete Aging M. Niehoff Apr I Feb 1 (H)

FFFFFFFFFFFF XXXXXXXX Study Part 2,

Install Component J.

Reesy Jan $(R) Mar 31 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXX Shelf-I.ife Program i

VII.

MORAI.E AND HUMAN PRODUCTIVITY MANAGEMENT j

VII,1 Problem Inten t i f ica t ion, T.

Willey Jan 2 Feb 28 XXXXXXXX Ownership and Actson Ik Planning i

i i

l t

A germlim A l

Ddinhtt II Public Service Company of Colorado Periormance Enhancement Program Project V.7 - Develop Nuclear Production Division Traaning for INIO Accreditation Percent Complete Schedule Project Timetable Antys Desgn Devel Eval Start Sulmit Compi 1985 - 1986 Prol Description Sum Phase Phase Phase Phase SFR SEMI *)

(8)

M/J J/A S/O N/D J/F M/A N/J J/A S/O N/D Pnrt i Operator Accreditation 1.

Non Licensed Reactor Operator 95 90 100 100 80 100 11/84 9/85 I?/85 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF FE d

2.

Licensed peactor Operator 100 100 100 100 80 100 I/85 9/85 12/85 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF I

3.

Senior peactor Operator 6 70 100 100 SR 80- 100 1/85 9/85 12/85 rFfvFFFFFFFFFFFf t:E l

Shaft Supervisor Ptrt 2 Non-operator Accredatatson 4.

Chemistry Technarian 40 85 8

?S 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/80 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXX4XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8

5 Electrical Maintenance Personnel 18 50 la 15 80 70 1/85 9/H6 12/96 FFFtTFFFFFFFFFFF XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8

6.

Mechanical Maintenance Personnel 50 78 15 46 80 10 1/85 9/86 12/ R6 ITITFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8

7.

Technical Advasors 20 50 15 10 80 70 12/84 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFITFFFFF FFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8

8.

Instrument Technician 55 9p 11 15 80 70 1/85 9/86 !?/86 FFFFFFFfTtTFFFFF tTF X X X X X X XX X XXXX X XXXXXX X 8

9.

Radsological Protect.non Tech.

% 100 7

11 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/H6 FFf t FITFFFFFFFFf ffTFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 8

19 Technical Staff 6 Managers to I1 7

25 HD 70 6/85 9/8b 12/86 tTFFFFFFFFFFFF F)FFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX e

.g dk (11 Note: Scheilu le as for subesttang the Self I.va lu.st son Repor t (SElO to INPO and implementing the tralning programs at PSC

- not for achievang INPO ik..a r et Acc red n e a t s on, c>

D.

PROJECT I - ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS PROJECT I.1 FORMALIZE ACTION PLAN, REORGANIZATION AND PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - Doug Picard - Complete DOCUMENT CHARTERS, MISSION AND FUNCTION PROJECT I.2 STATEMENTS - Doug Picard - Complete DOCUMENT POLICY ON COMMUNICATIONS AND STAFF PROJECT I.3 MEETINGS - Mike Zacharv - Complete PROJECT I.4 - EVALUATE STAFFING LEVELS - Carrie Gaudreau Part 1 - Evaluate and Approve Staffing - Complete Part 2 - Hire New Personnel

1. The status of the new positions ~is as follows:

a.

5 of 5 in Quality Assurance,

b. 43 of 46 in Nuclear Production,

c. 5 of 9 in Nuclear Licensing and Fuels, d.

17 of 17'in Nuclear Engineering, e.

1 of 1 in Administration, and f.

71 of 78 in total or 91 percent.

2. Of the 71 positions

filled, approximately 23 are internal nuclear transfers.

Of.these 23, 17 external candidates have filled these openings.

3. Overall, there are approximately 34 positions open within the nuclear organization.

Seven of these are from the original seventy-eight approved in this project.

4. The remaining positions will most likely take-through February to fill.

A concerted effort by Nuclear Licensing and Fuels is needed since four of the remaining positions are in this division.

PROJECT I.5 COMPLETE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES - Jack Gahm - Complete PROJECT I.6

- EVALUATE ENGINEERING AND LICENSING AND FUELS AT FORT ST. VRAIN - Don Warembourg - Complete

PROJECT I.7 - COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION GRIDS - Doug Picard Part 1 - Implement Corporate Grid - Complete

1. The Corporate Decision Grid was issued in October to all supervisory personnel holding Volume II of the-Nuclear Policies and Guidelines Manual.. This grid summarizes corporate procedures for approving various transactions such as personnel requisitions, payroll changes and budget requests.

2. This project part is now complete.

Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nuclear Decision Grids

1. The project team met in late November to finalize approach and format.

A working draft-was used as a

basis.

2. Assignments of responsibility have been made to team members.

Due to other conflicts, the sections will not be complete until mid-January.

This will delay this overall project part until January 31, 1986.

EVALUATE STAFF RETENTION - Duane Rodgers -

PROJECT I.8 Complete

1. The project manager was changed in October to Duane Rodgers which contributed to a delay in completion.

2. A memorandum describing the retention problem and recommendations for change has been prepared.

The memo suggested that further analysis be completed.

3. A meeting was held in' early December between nuclear management and Corporate Employee

. Relations to discuss the issues.

Employee Relations has agreed to complete several actions in response to this study.

Two action items are an independent assessment of nuclear salaries and an analysis of reasons for transfers.

4. This project is now complete.

We anticipate that some results from this study will be incorporated into Project VII Morale and Human Productivity Management.

l l

l i

PROJECT II - MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING ESTABLISH NUCLEAR -MASTER PLANNING AND PROJECT II.1 SCHEDULING - Doug Picard - Complete 1.~The report documenting Master Planning and Scheduling was finalized in October.

2. Nuclear Policy number 23, Planning and Scheduling Policy was issued in November.

3. This project is now ccmplete.

DEVELOP ANNUAL AND LONG-RANGE SCHEDULES -

PROJECT II.2 Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Schedule - Complete PROJECT II.3 - IMPLEMENT PLANNING AND SCHEDULING METHODS AND PROCEDURES - Doug Picard Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - NED Implementation - R.

Craun

1. Efforts have continued on manhours tracking system development.

Timesheet formats and supervisory level reports have been defined and reviewed with accounting.

This system will be pilot tested with NED Special Projects Department.

2. Work has begun on a methodology for cost and manpower estimates for design changes.

3. Work on material purchasing and warehousing status reporting has been delayed awaiting work in other divisions.

The approach is being finalized in other PEP projects.

Part 3 - NLF Implementation - R.

Husted

1. The divisional procedure for planning and scheduling has been drafted and is being approved.

2. A PC-based scheduling system has been selected (Project Manager Workbench).

Part 4 - QA Implementation - M.

Ferris

1. The procedures (OAGP) to support QA planning and scheduling have been issued and support the overall nuclear policy on planning and scheduling.

i 1

Part 5 - NPD Implementation - D.

Miller

1. The implementation action plan has been revised.

The scheduled completion has not yet changed.

Progress to date has been limited to the creation and maintenance of the long-range outage schedule.

PROJECT II.4 - EVALUATE MP&S FOR FOSSIL - D.

Picard

1. This project is being removed from the PEP since it is non-nuclear in nature.

The project will still be undertaken but shift to the Master Schedule.

i 1

i I.-

i PROJECT III - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING PROJECT III.1 - ESTABLISH MAINTENANCE PLANNING GROUP - Dave Miller

1. Two of. four individuals have joined the maintenance planning and scheduling group.

A third has accepted a job offer and begins-January 15, 1986.

PROJECT III.2

- DEFINE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING FUNCTION - Dave Miller 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 1

Part 2 - Implementation

1. The implementation schedule has been substantially revised to reflect the availability of new staff.

Scheduled completion is now June 20, 1986.

2.

EQ is adversely affecting progress on-this project.

Three planning and scheduling staff are dedicated to EQ for 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> coverage and are unavailable to make significant progress on procedureal changes for the new program.

PROJECT III.3

- DEVELOP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING PROGRAM - Frank Novachek Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2

PM Development, Existing Critical Significant Components

1. Additional procedures have been identified that relate to EQ.

This brings the total of procedures to 351 (increased from 310).

Of the 351 procedures, 153 are rewritten and in review, 63 are being rewritten, 66 are on hold and 69 are yet to be started.

80% of the procedures are in process or complete.

2. The review and approval cycle continues as the key problem for this project and will delay completion until March 1, 1986.

3. A vendor manual maintenance program is being implemented to keep vendor information current.

Scheduled completion is January 15, 1986.

4. The maintenance tracking and feedback procedures have been issued as Plant Engineering Procedures 1 and

2. i l

I

Part 3 - PM Development, Remainder of Critical Significant Components

1. Project begins January, 1986.

Part 4 - Post Maintenance Testing Procedure - Complete Part 5 - Revise Maintenance Procedures

1. This project part was incorrectly established since it is redundant with Part 2, PM Develoment, Existing Critical Significant Components.

The existing maintenance procedures are being rewritten as both maintenance procedures and corrective maintenance procedures.

PROJECT III.4 - EVALUATE DAVIS-BESSE EVENT - D.

Picard Part 1 - Initial Review - Complete

1. A list of 22 action items was prepared.

This list has been refined into ten action i'. ems.

Each. item will then be assigned a responsible individual.

Part 2 - Detail Evaluation

1. This project part has been' added based upon the completion of Part 1, Initial Review.

This part will consist of a

more dctailed evaluation of the ten action items.

Each action item has been assigned to a

nuclear manager.

The schedule for this project part will be developed in January.

A i

} -

PROJECT IV - UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES PROJECT IV.1 - REVIEW AND REVISE DESIGN CHANGE MODIFICATION PROCESS - Jack Reesy

1. The new engineering procedure (ENG-1), that describes design changes, has been revised based on comments from other divisions.

A flow diagram is also being developed to be included with-the procedure.

PROJECT IV.2

- IMPLEMENT COMMITMENT CONTROL PROGRAM - Dave

'Goss - Complete

1. Level I procedure, G-14, Commitment Control Program, has been issued and training of.FSV personnel completed.

This project is now complete.

DOCUMENT PROCEDURES FOR REGULATORY PROJECT IV.3 CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW - Dave Goss - Complete

1. The same Level I procedure (G-14) as.in Project IV.2, Implement Commitment Control Program, has been issued to meet the requirements of this project.

This project is now complete.

PROJECT IV.4 - REVIEW ESSENTIAL REGULATORY DOCUMENTS - Dave Goss Part 1 - Review Essential Regulatory Documents

1. Stone and Webster Engineering has completed

.the review of regulatory documents.

Of the 276 documents

reviewed, approximately 60 items were identified as possible ongoing obligations.

Passive and/or active commitments have been created for the identified items.

2. The new ongoing obligations catalog is still being reviewed by those organizations responsible for the obligations.

3. Completion of the above two items should require until mid-January and project completion has been delayed.

Part 2 - Define Additional Ongoing Obligations

1. There has been little progress on. Sis part during the last few months.

It' appears that it will not begin until Part 1

is mostly complete.

The time estimates and schedule are also being reviewed.

=

4 REVIEW AND REVISE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ~

PROJECT IV.5 PROCEDURES - Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Nuclear Production Procedures Development

1. The revision of results (I&C calibration) procedures is now 100% complete.

The approval cycle continues to be a problem.

Issuing these procedures is not now expected until March 31, 1986.

Of the 464 procedures being revised, all are rewritten, 168 issued and 296 are in review.

2. Currently, 57 of 58 System Operating Procedures (SOP's) are in process.

Twenty-two have been revised and are being reviewed with walkdowns being conducted.

All drafts should be complete and ready for review by February 28.

Part 3 - Review and Revise Emergency Procedures

1. This effort is becoming more complex than expected due to NUREG-0737 Bids from contract organizations are being delayed.

The overall schedule has been extended to March 31, 1987.

Licensing input is also needed on this project.

PROJECT IV.6 - REVIEW AND REVISE EXCLUSION LIST AND RELATED PROCEDURES - Tim Prenger

1. The overall approach to this project has changed -

based upon Gilbert Commonwealth's re-involvement in this project.

2. The proposed procurement system will not include an Exclusion List..

Parts will be classified as Commodity, Non-safety-related and Safety-related by definition and reviewed by Engineering for proper classification.

3. The existing Exclusion List will be moved from Level I procedure Q-4, Procurement Document

Control, when the new "G"

Level I

procedure that defines procurement is issued.

This project will be complete then with an expected completion of January 31.

Jim PROJECT

'IV.7 REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Gramling

-Part 1 - Develop and Submit 17r NRC Approval

1. The Final Draft and other documents were submitted November 30, 1985. >

i

~

2. We have received NRC's rewritten specifiations for helium circulators, steam generators, and PCRV Liner Cooling System.

We are evaluating these recommended

changes,

3. The changes from the current Technical Specifications t

are being reviewed to begin the Significant Hafards Analysis.

i REVIEW AND REVISE ENGINEERING PROCEDURES -

PROJECT IV.8 Mike Daum j.

Part 1 - Revise Procedures

1. This project is now ahead of schedule.

All of the i

existing ENG and ten of ten STD procedures have now been rewritten.

Ten new ENG procedures were written addressing performance based training (using INPO's i

Training Systems Development).

2. The CWP Manual remains as the last item for this project.

An interim revision may be. issued but the manual may be incorporated into Site Engineering j

procedures.

PROJECT IV.9 - REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I PLANT PROCEDURES (P

& G) - Jack Gahm

]

4 I

Part 1 - Revise

'P' Procedures - Chuck Fuller l

1. Level I

procedures P-1, Plant Operations, and P-2, Equipment Clearances and Operation Deviations, have 1

been revised and issued.

t Part 2 - Revise

'G' Procedures - Frank Novachek 1

1

1. A formal guide for the "G" procedure revision has l

been issued.

Work has begun on each procedure.

PROJECT IV.10 - REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I QUALITY ASSURANCE l

PROCEDURES - Mike Ferris l

1. A review methodology has been finalized and a format l

for the revised procedures developed, f

2. Procedure Q-0, Quality

Policy, is complete.

No revisions were required, i

3. Procedures Q-1, FSV Organization and i

Responsibilities, and 0-2, Quality Assurance Program are in the revision process.

I i

i I

PROJECT V - IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION TRAINING CONDUCT MANAGEMENT SKILLS UPGRADE - Martin PROJECT V.1 McNulty - Complete Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation of Core Courses - Complete

1. This project part

. includes now only the core or generic courses that were identified in Part 1.

These courses have been held.

Most mangement personnel have now attended a

three-day managerial

. competencies training workshop and several other courses.

2.

Individual training _ needs were also identified and are being scheduled.

Attendance at chosen courses is being tracked by the corporate training organization and not as a part of this project.

3. This project part is now complete.

PROJECT V.2 - REVIEW MEMBERSHIP IN INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS -

Larry Brey - Complete PROJECT V.3 - ENHANCE 10CFR50.59 TRAINING - Mike Holmes Part 1 - Conduct Training - Jeff Johns - Complete Part 2 - Update Text Data Base - Dave Goss

1. An additional 104 "G" letters from the NRC that were not received during 1980 - 1985 are beina input.

The identification of these letters has increased the work required but should not impact the schedule.

2. Entry of 1985 correspondence missing from the data base is

complete, entry of missing 1984 correspondence is 50% complete and entry of missing

~

1983 correspondence has not started.

Part 3 - Train NED Personnel - Jeff Johns

1. Training in 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluations has been given to two of the five groups planned for in the Nuclear Engineering Division.

Training for the remaining three is to be complete by January 10, 1986.

PROJECT V.4 - IMPROVE QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION TRAINING -

M.-Ferris Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation

1. The Analysis (job and task) phase of INPO's Training System Development methodology has been completed.

The final report describing the Analysis was submitted in early December.

2. Division management is now evaluating which courses will be developed by PSC and which will be developed using consulting assistance.

PROJECT V.5 - IMPROVE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAINING

- Mike Daum Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete

1. A memorandum was issued at the end of October summarizing this project part and the proposed Engineering training program.

This project part is l

now complete.

2. Based upon the completion of the Initial Definition (Part 1), the implementation is being restructured.

Part 2 is now the completion of the procedure lesson plans (previously Part 3).

Parts 3 and 4

are the j

implementation of the training program.

Part 3 will be the Job and Task Analysis'(TSD) and development of four single-lesson plan courses.

The courses developed will determine degree of effort required for course development in Part 4.

Part 4 will complete the implementation steps and the schedule will be re-evaluated after Part 3.

Part 2 - Complete Procedure Training Lesson Plans

1. Three of eleven lesson plans are complete with a fourth started.

The completed lesson plans are for ENG procedures.

2. The lesson plan for the CWP Manual will be delayed until the manual is issued.

Part 3 - Job and Task Analysis

1. This project includes the job and task analysis for all 23 proposed courses and the pilot development of four single lesson plan courses.

2. Job and Task Analysis task lists are being prepared for engineering positions.

Progress has been reported on 8 of the 24 job and task analysis areas.

3. A new training category has been created for Site Engineering Technicians from Design (Diamond Hill)

Engineering Technicians.

.9 0

4. This project part has fallen about one month behind schedule.

Part 4 - Implementation

1. This part will include the Design and Development phases'(of-TSD) for the remaining courses.

The schedule will be revised based upon the experience gained in Part 3 and the available resources at that time.

Completion is now estimated at either October, 1988 or

July, 1989 depending on the personnel available.

IMPROVE LICENSING AND FUELS TRAINING - Bob PROJECT V.6 Husted Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete Part 2 - Implementation

1. The work specifications for the bid packages are complete. and the bids were received in mid-December.

2. The bid processing has taken longer than expected and should be completed in January.

PROJECT V.7

- DEVELOP NUCLEAR PRODUCTION DIVISION TRAINING FOR INPO ACCREDITATION - Ted Borst Part 1 - Operator Accreditation Training

1. We made excellent progress during December to catch up on two of the three positions that were behind schedule.

Addit onal manpower from Operations was d

assigned on an overtime basis.

Percent completes for these positions are as follows:

-Non-licensed Operator - 95%

-Reactor Operator - 100%

-Senior Reactor Operator / Shift Supervisor - 70%

2. Completion of this project part has been extended to January 31, 1986.

l Part 2 - Non-Operatot Accreditation i

1. We have continued to progress on these positions s

during the quarter.

Ted Borst -

CONSOLIDATE SITE TRAINING PROJECT V.8 Complete

l PROJECT V.9 - RETRAIN LICENSED PERSONNEL - Ted Borst Part 1 - Training Program Development - Complete

1. The Reactor Operator training. material was completed in December.

This part is now complete.

Part 2 - Conduct Training

1. The retraining effort is ahead of schedule and is nearly 50% complete....

tF

• PROJECT VI - PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS PROJECT VI.1 - FORMALIZE PLANT TOUR PROCEDURES AND REPORTING

- Chuck Fuller - Complete REVISE CONDUCT OF PLANT OPERATIONS - Chuck PROJECT VI.2 Fuller - Complete PROJECT VI.3 - DOCUMENT SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES - Chuck Fuller - Complete IMPLEMENT PLANT SIGNAGE PROGRAM - Chuck PROJECT VI.4 Fuller - Hold

~

1. This project has been deferred until sufficient resources are available.

Outside contractors are being considered.

2. Possible union problems with non-union personnel working on the project have been resolved.

COMPIETE FACILITIES FLANNING STUDY - Frank PROJECT VI.5 Novachek - Complece PROJECT VI.6 - IMPROVE PARTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Jack Reesy

]

Part 1 - Initial Assessment

1. A new revised procurement procedure and flow diagram has been drafted.

This draft is being discussed as the revised approach to procurement.

~

2. Completion has been extended to January 15.

PROJECT VI.7 - ESTABLISH-COMPONENT SHELF-LIFE PROGRAM - Jack Reesy/ Mike Niehoff Part 1 - Complete Aging Study - Mike Niehoff

1. Wyle Labs has been unreliable in completing the work assigned.

They are re-submitting some of their aging work which will be received by PSC in January.

l Sargent and.Lundy is analyzing this data with completion expected by February 3, 1986.

Part 2 - Install Component Shelf-Life Program - Jack Reesy

1. Project start-up has been impacted by de' lays in Part

~

1, Complete Aging Study.

l t 1

i

(