ML20138H685
| ML20138H685 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Saint Vrain  |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1985 |
| From: | Brey H PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO |
| To: | Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| References | |
| P-85373, TAC-60566, NUDOCS 8510290122 | |
| Download: ML20138H685 (46) | |
Text
F-t ,
t 1
'g4 0 PublicService ..m ,.m.
Company of Colo, ado P.O. Box 840 2420 W. 26th Avenue, Suite 100D, Denver, Colorado 80211 Dgr c m201 - 0840 October 21, 1985 Fort St. Vrain Unit No. 1 P-85373 Regional Administrator k= k ($1 '
Region IV %jt
>' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ h !
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OCT 2 2 E g y/ l 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, TX 76011 ' k(\
" [_ . i; Attention: Mr. Eric H. Johnson Docket No. 50-267
SUBJECT:
Status Report Performance Enhancement Program
Dear Mr. Johnson:
Enclosed is a Status Report Ior the Performance Enhancement Program. It is the second status report to the NRC and covers the four-month time period from June 3 through September 30, 1985. The report documents the verbal status report given to you in Arlington, Texas on October 11, 1985 by Mr. H. L. Brey, Manager, Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division, and Mr. D. M. Picard, Peformance Enhancement Program Manager. Included as Appendix A to the status report is a copy of the view graphs used in our meeting.
This letter is consistent with our commitment made in our May 29, 1985 SALP meeting to provide progress reports on a quarterly basis if desired. We anticipate another report in January covering October, November, and December. At that time, we will also respond to your letter of October 3, 1985 dO to Mr. O..R. Lee from Mr. D. R. Hunter regarding the e \
Performance Enhancement Program.
8510290122 851021
/1 FDR ADCCK 05000267 b/ 3 PDR
@ lll m
s .
T 1
',, ~2-If you have any questions please contact Mr. M. H. Holmes at (303) 571-8409.
Very truly yours, hw H. L. Brey, Manager i Nuclear Licensing and Fuels Division cc: K. Heitner, Fort St. Vrain Project Manager E. J. Butcher, Acting Chief, Operating Reactors Branch #3 l
l l
l l
l l
I 1
L.
.q, 3
- * *' CRG-85-006 Public Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program Status Report - As of September 30, 1985 This report documents the status of Public Service Company of Colorado's Performance Enhancement Program and covers the four-month time period from June 3 through September 30, 1985. The report has been compiled from status reports submitted semi-monthly and/or monthly from each project manager. This is our second status report to the NRC.
Summary Status We are now six months into a multi-year program. We have made good progress against our schedule despite the high priority of environmental qualification work. So far, the chief '.mpact of EQ has_been to hinder the timely completion of reviews associated with new procedures, policies, reports, etc. Remedial action is being taken to correct the situation.
To-date, we have completed 11 of the 34 original projects and 11 of the current total of 42 projects. Many parts of the longer-term projects have also been completed.
Exhibit I is the Summary Schedule Bar Chart. It shows the original schedule and progress to date in summary form of i each project. Also, Exhibit II, is a more detailed schedule of Project V.7, Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation. Included as Appendix A are the view graphs utilized in our verbal presentation of status on October 11, 1985 at your offices in Arlington, Texas.
The remaining sections of this report describe the progress of each project. The points describe work completed and problems encountered.
Completions During This Period The following eleven projects were completed during this reporting period:
Project I.1, Formalize Action Plan, Reorganization and Performance Enhancement Program i
. Project I.2, Document Charters, Missions and Function Statements Project I.3, Document Policy on Communication and Staff Meetings L _ .
e i Project I.5, Complete Nuclear Production Organizational Changes
- Project I.6, Evaluate Engineering and Licensing and Fuels at Fort St. Vrain Project V.2, Review Membership in Industry Organizations Project V.8, Consolidate Site Training T*xject VI.1, Formalize Plant Tour Procedures and brinrting Project VI.2, Revise Conduct of Operations Project VI.3, Document Supervisor Responsibilities Project VI.5, Complete Facilities Planning Study Project Changes and/or Additions to Program In addition to the above fully completed projects, there have been many sub-parts completed. These are noted in the detailed status report for each project that follows this section.
We continue to adapt and modify the entire program to current needs as appropriate. Entire projects (or sub-projects) or parts of projects are added to reflect new areas or increases in scope to existing projects. Changes are also made based upon analysis or completion of an initial definition part. Specific modifications or additions are as follows:
Project I.7, Complete Organization Decision Grids has been added. It will address the completion and implementation of Decision Grids that will be included in Volume II of the Nuclear Policies and Guidelines manaual. Part I will implement the Decision Grid which summarizes various approval levels required for routine PSC paperwork, such as payroll, promotions, budgets, capital expenditures, etc. Part 2 of this project will develop a Decision Grid that applies to Nuclear-specific activities. It will include items such as Change Notices, Action Requests, Non Conformance Reports, etc.
Project I.8, Evaluate Staff Retention has been added and will address recent downward retention trends that are specific to the nuclear organization. The project will consider reasons for personnel turnover and develop recommendations for improvement. The project will also address how these recommendations will apply to acquiring new, experienced personnel.
l
1
'n ,
t ) l 5
Project' II.3, Implement Planning and Scheduling Methods and' Procedures has been modified based upon the Initial Definition, Part 1. The implementation has been split into divisional projects, Parts 2 through 5, Nuclear Engineering, Unclear Licensing and Fuels, Quality Assurance, and Nuclear Production, respectively. The schedule for each part will vary and is being solidified.
Project II.4, Evaluate MP&S for Fossil is new and will evaluate how Master Planning and Scheduling could be adapted to fossil electric production. The scope is non-nuclear in nature.
Project III.3, Develop Preventive Maintenance Engineering Program has been modified. The scope of the preventive maintenance procedures development has been reduced to " Critical Significant Components" and the use of trend- analysis for the remaining components. The specific changes are described in the detail status report for the project.
Project III.4, Evaluate Davis-Besse Event is new. It is a multi-divisional project to evaluate the events at Davis-Besse. loss of feedwater accident and determine similarities and/or potential areas of concern for FSV.
Project IV.4, . Review Essential Regulatory Documents has been expanded in scope and Part 2, Define Additional Ongoing Obligations has been added. This new part will review the FSAR, past Commitment Logs, and Chapter 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10CFR) and document ongoing obligations.
Project IV.5, Review and Revise Nuclear Production Procedures, Part 3, Review Emergency Procedures has been. added. Based upon the revision of Results Procedures and Standard Operating Procedures, a need
- was defined to rewrite Emergency Procedures. The schedule for this work is different than Part 2 and l begins August, 1985 and is to finish July, 1986.
Project V.3, Enhance 10CFR50.59 Training has an added Part 3, Train NED Personnel. Training of Licensing personnel was completed in August, but a need was i identified to give NED personnel the same training for completing safety evaluations.
Projact V.5, Improve Nuclear Engineering Division i Training, has been revised. The original approach
! wa34 to develop Procedure Training Outlines (PTO's) l but based upon the use of Training System Development (TSD), lesson plans will be developed instead. This change in approach is reflected by moving Project i i
e i
- - IV.8, Review and Revise NED Procedures, Part 2, Complete Procedure Training Outlines to Project V.5, Improve NED Training, Part 3, Complete Procedure Lesson Plane.
Our May 31, 1985 status report included two added overall projects - Project VII, Operating Plan Development and Project VIII, Plant Start-up. These have not been included in this report since their scope is outside of the Performance Enhancement Program.
l
.- .?
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE PROJECT TIMETABLE EST. SCHFDULED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D QI O2 03 Q4
q __
Impnd I. ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS M = E % 1ed Timetable I.1 E.2 Formalize Action Plan, Reor- D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF ganization and Performance xxx0 = Sde& led Timetable Enhancement Program with ur* fired com-pletica date 1.2 A.) Document Charters, Missions FDOC = Finished work within this adm &te and Function Statements Part 1, Develop Charters D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFF xxE = htered sche &1e Part 2. Update Procedures D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF teyond ortgual time-table I.3 A.9 Document Policy on Conusuni- M. Zachary Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF xx- = sde&1e has itoat came cation and Staff Meetings to meet original sche &1e Projects starts or finishes later or earlier than I.4 E.1 Evaluate Staffing Levels C. Caudreau pined.
Part 1, Evaluate and Approve Complete FFFF Staffing Part 2, Hire New Personnel May 1 Nov 29 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFM KXXXXXXX I.S E.6 Complete Nuclear Production J. Cahm Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Organizational Changes I.6 E.3 Evaluate Engineering and D. Warembourg Complete FFFFFFFFFF E.4 Licensing and Fuels at Fort St. Vrain I.7 Complete Organization D. Picard Decision Crids Part 1 - Implement Corporate Jul 1 Oct 18 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFF EEE Grid Part 2 - Develop and Implement Sep 3 Dec 13 FFFF KXXXXXXXXX N Nuclear Decision Grids d H
I.8 Evaluate Staff Retention C. Gaudreau Jul 1 Oct 31 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFFEEEE Ak
1 PUIEIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM .,
SUMMARY
SCifEDUI.E PROJECT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 F
II. MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING II.1 A.2 Establish Nuclear Master D. Picard Apr 1 Oct 18(R)FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF: EEE Planning and Scheduling Function II.2 A.4 Develop Annual and Long- C. Fuller Range Schedules Part 1 Initial Schedule Complete FFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Complete Schedule Dependent-II.3 OXX(EST)XXO II.3 A.2 Implement Planning and Sche-duling Methods & Procedures Part 1, Initial Definition D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2 NED Implementation R. Craun Aug 5 Apr 1986 FFFFFFXXX(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 3, NLF Implesmentation R. Ilusted Sep 30 Jan 15 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 4, QA Implementation M. Ferris Aug 5 Jan 3 1986 XXXX(EST) (XXXXXXXXXXO Part 5, NPD Implementation W. Franek Aug 5 Apr 1986 XXXXX(ESTlXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXO II.4 Evaluate MP&S For Fossil D. Picard Oct 1986 Dec 1986 XXX0 Mb i
t
O PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SCHEDULf PRCMECT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D 01 02 03 04 III. ESTABLISH PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE
'PEhMNING AND SCHEDULING III.1 B.2 Establish Maintenance D. Miller Apr 1 Oct 311R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXI! EEEE Planning Group III.2 B.3 Define Maintenance Planning D. Miller and Scheduling Function Part 1, Initial Definition Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Jul 15 Jan 3 FFFFFFXXXM KXXXXXXXXXXX III.3 P.4 Develop Preventive Mainte- P. Novachek nance Engineering Program Part 1, Initial Definition Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, PM Development, Aug 5 Jan 3 FFFFFFXM KXXXXXXXXXXX Existing Critical Signifi-cant Components Part 3, PM Development, Jan 1986 Dec 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Remainder of Critical Significant Components Part 4, Post Maintenance Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Testing Procedure Part 5, Revise Maintenance Procedures Jul 1 Jan 3 FFFFFFFXXXXX KXXXXXXXXXXX III.4 Evaluate Davis-Besse Event D. Picard Sep 3 Jan 3 FFFXKXXXXXXXXXXX Mb i
_. _ - .- -. _~ -
PUDI.lc SERVICE COMPANY OF COI.OPADO o PFRFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE PROJFCT TIM _ETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 ~'
1986 8
PRO- NUS MAN- l JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLf:TF A M J J A S O N D 01 02 03 04 IV. UPCRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IV.1 R.I Review and Revise Design J. Reesy Apr 1 Jan 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFITFFFFFF KXXXXXXXXXXX A.5 Change Modification Process IV.2 C.1 Implement NRC Comunitment D. Coss Apr 1 Oct 18 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFITFFFEEEEREE Control Program IV.3 C.2 Document Procedures for D. Coss Apr 1 Oct 18 t R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFF FFFFtTEEEE EEE Regulatory Correspondence Review-IV.4 C.3 Review Essential Regulatory M. Holmes Documents Part 1 Review Essential May 1 Nov I FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF EXXX
' Regulatory Documents Part 2, Define Additional On- Oct 1 Jun 1986 KXX(EST)XXXXXXXXXXXXX0 going Obligations IV.5 A.6 Review and Revise Nuclear Production Procedures Part 1, Initial Definition C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFF Part 2, Nuclear Production C. Fuller Jul 1 Jan 1 FFF ITFFFFFFF (XXXXXXXXXXX Procedures Development Part 3, Review and Revise C. Fullet Aug 2 Jul 19P6 FFFFFFFF(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Emergency Procedures IV.6 Review and Revise Exclusion T. Prenger Apr i Nov 15 (RIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFfTFFFFFFFEEECEE List and Related Procedures IV.7 Revise. Technical Specifi-cations Part 1, Develop and Submit J. Gramling Apr 1 Apr 30(R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFtTFFFFFXX KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX for NRC Approval Part 2, Implement and C. Fuller May 1 (R) Next XXX(EST)XXXX0 Train at Plant Refueling IV.8 Review and Revise Nuclear M. Daum Engineering Divisian Procedures Part 1, Revise Procedures May 1 Apr 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFKXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.O Review and Revise Level 1 Plant Procedures (P 6 C)
Part 1, Revise 'P' Procedure C. Fuller Sep 3. Jul 1986 FFXM KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 2, Revise 'C' Procedure F. Novachek Sep 3 Jul 1986 FFXM KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.10 Review end Revise Level I M. Ferris Sep 3 Jul 1986 XXXM KXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX d b OA Procedures (0)
. ~
~
I PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PEPPORMANCE ENHANCEMFNT PPOGRAM
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE ,
PROJICT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-JECT REF. DESCWIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D 01 02 03 04 V. IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION PERSONNE!. TRAINING V.1 A.3 Conduct Management Skilla M. McNulty Upgrade Part 1, Initial Defissition Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Aug 5 Jan 3 FFFXXM (EST)XXXXXXXX V.2 A.10 Review Membership in 'L . Brey Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Industry Organizationn V.3 B.7' Enhance 10CFR50.59 Training Part 1, Conduct Training J. Johns complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Update Text Data D. Goss Apr 1 Dec 1986 FFrFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXM EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Base Part 3, Train NED Personnel J. Johns Sep 3 Oct 15 XXXz KX V.4 D.1 Improve Ouality Assurance M. Ferris D.2 Division Training D4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete FFFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Jun 3 Sep 1 1986 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE V.5 D.1 Improve Nuclear Engineering M. Daum D.2 Division Training D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Apr 1 Nov 1 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF?FFFFFF KXXX Part 2, Implementation Nov 4 Determined XXXXX(ESTlXXXX0 in Part 1 Part 3, Complete Procedure Oct 14 Jun 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Leseen Plans V.6 D.1 Improve Licensing and Fuels R. Husted 4 D.2 Division Training 4
D.4 Part 1, Initial fiefinition Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Sep 2 Sep 30 1986 FFFF (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX V.7 D.1 Develop Nuclear Production T. Sorst D.2 Division Training for INPO D3 Accreditation D.4 Part 1, Operator Accredita- Apr 1 Jan 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXKXXXXXXXXXXXX tion Training Part 2, Non-Operator Accre- Jul 1 Dec 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFFPFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ditation Training V.8 D.5 Consolidate Site Training 'T. Borst Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF U.9 D.6 Retrain Licensed Personnel T. Dorst Part 1. Training Program May 6 Jan 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXFKXXXXXXAXXXX Development XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 2. Conduct Training Jan 1986 Sep 1986
.i .'
. e i
PUI1LIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PERFORMAhCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE .
PROJECT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-JBCT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D Q1 02 03 Q4
m --
VI. PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS VI.1 A.8 Formalize Plant Tour Proce- C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF dures and Reporting VI.2 Revise Conduct of Operations C. . Fuller Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF VI.3 Document Supervisor C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Responsibilities VI.4 Implement Plant Signage C. Fuller Apr 1 Jan 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXX (XXXXXXXXXXXX Program VI.5 Complete Facilities Planning F. Novachek Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Study VI.6 Improve Parts Management J. Reesy System Part 1, Initial Assessment Apr 1 Dec 31(R) -FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXX EEEEEEEEEEEE Part 2, Implementatiun Jan 5 Determined '
in Part I XXX(EST)XXX0 VI.7 Establish Component Shelf-Life Program Part 1 Complete Aging M. Nichoff Apr 1 Nov 1 (R)--------FFFFFFFFFFFFXXXX REEE Study Part 2, Install Componer.t J. Reesy Nov 1(R) Mar 31 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXX Shelf-Life Program Jk t
.i Public Service Company of Colorado Performance Enhancement Program .
2
) Project V.7 - Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INFO Accreditation Percent Complate Schedule Project Timetable Anlys Desgn Devel Eval Start Submit Compt 1985 - 1986 Proj Description Sue Phase Phase Phase Phase SER SEst*) (8) N/J J/A S/O N/D J/F N/A 88/J J/A S/D N/D qp----
Part 1 Operator Accreditation Non Licensed Reactor Operator 57 75 25 58 80 100 11/84 9/85 12/05 FFFFFFXXXI KXXXXX
- 1. '
8 Licensed Reactor Operator 15 100 100 65 80 100 1/95 9/05 12/85 FFFFFFFFFf KXXXXX
- 2. '
S 25 33 80 100 3/85 9/85 12/05 FFFFFFFFFf KXXXXX
- 3. Senior Reactor Operator s 45 100 a I
Shift Supervisor Part 2 Mon-operator Accredatatinn Chem'istry Technician 25 55 8 25 80 70 1/85 9/06 12/86 FFFFFFFFFf FFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
=
- 4. e 18 50 10 15 80 70 1/05 9/86 12/06 FFFFFFFFFf VFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 5. Electrical Maintenance P.trsonnel
- 8 40 55 15 26 80 70 1/95 9/06 12/86 FFFFFFFFFf FFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
) 6. Mechanical Maintenance Personnel
- 8 20 50 15 30 80 70 12/04 9/06 12/86 FFFFFFFFFf FFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 7. Technical Advisors
- I 47 70 13 35 80 70 3/05 9/06 12/86 FFFFFFFFFf FFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX S. Instrument Technician
- C Radiological Protection Tech. 40 45 7 33 80 70 6/85 9/06 12/86 FFFFFFFFFF FFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 3 3.
i
- 10. Technical Staff & Managers !I IO 7 25 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/96 FFFFFFFFFf FFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 8 db Schedule is for submitting the Self Evaluation Report (SER) to IMPO and implementing the training programs at PSC
-(I) notNote for achieving INPO poard Accredatation.
4 m
3 H
H
)
4 e
'.b PROJECT I - ORGANIZATIONAL CONCERNS
SUMMARY
Of the six projects (I.1 - I.6) originally defined in the PEP, five are now fully complete. Project I.4, Evaluate Staffing Levels, is complete as originally defined, but now includes a new Part 2, Hire New Personnel. Two projects have been added since our last status report - Project I.7, Complete Organization Decision Grids and Project I.8, Evaluate Staff Retention.
FROJECT I.1 -
FORMALIZE ACTION PLAN, REORGANIZATION AND
- PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM - Doug Picard - Complete
- 1. This project was completed in June. Project Manager Binders were issued, a Manager of the PEP was named, and organizational meetings held.
PROJECT I.2 -
DOCUMENT CHARTERS, MISSION AND FUNCTION STATEMENTS - Doug Picard - Complete Part 1 - Develop Charters - Complete
- 1. The charters were completed in July after the divisions " cross-reviewed" other's charters and inconsistencies resolved between the divisions.
Part 2 - Update Procedures - Complete
- 1. The charters have been included in a new volume of the Nuclear Policies and Guidelines. This volume, organizational Guidelines, also includes current nuclear organization charts.
- 2. The changes resulting from the charters to Administrative Procedure, Q-1 (FSV Organization and Responsibilities) and the FSAR have been identified.
- 3. Both volumes of the Nuclear Policies and Guidelines have now been issued to supervisory personnel.
PROJECT I.3 -
DOCUMENT POLICY ON COMMUNICATIONS AND STAFF MEETINGS - Mike Zachary - Complete
- 1. This project is complete with a new policy that was implemented in June.
PROJECT I.4 - EVALUATE STAFFING LEVELS - Carrie Gaudreau Part 1 - Evaluate and Approve Staffing - Complete Part 2 - Hire New Personnel u
1 l
.1
- 1. As of September 30, 54~ of 79 newly authorized positions have been filled with the following 4
breakdown:
- a. 4 of 5 in Quality Assurance,
- b. 30 of 45 in Nuclear Production,
- c. 3 of 9 in Nuclear Licensing and Fuels,
- d. 16 of 19 in Nuclear Engineering,
- e. 1 of 1 in Administration, and
- f. 54 of 79 in total or 68 percent.
4 PROJECT I.5 -
COMPLETE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES - Jack Gahm - Complete 4- 1. This project is now complete. Two section-level positions (Training and Technical Services) were
, est'ablished and filled. Also, several new supervisory positions were created. The organizational changes were approved in May but delays were experienced in obtaining the necessary j salary grade structures.
i
~
PROJECT I.6 - EVALUATE ENGINEERING AND LICENSING AND FUELS AT FORT ST. VRAIN - Don Warembourg - Complete 1 1. The study evaluating the location of Engineering and l Licensing and Fuels personnel was completed August 30.
- 2. The study determined that relocation of Diamond Hill Staff to the FSV site would not provide sufficient benefit.
, PROJECT I.7 - COMPLETE ORGANIZATIONAL DECISION GRIDS - Doug
, Picard i 1. This is.a new project with an objective to summarize and document existing approvals required for PSC activities and those specific to the nuclear i organization. The Decision Grids will be included in Volume II of the Nuclear. Policies and Guidelines
' manuals..
i Part'l - Implement Corporate Grid
- 1. A decision grid that was developed for the fossil-
~
production organizaton has been adapted for nuclear.
This ' grid is being reviewed by management, but the review process has taken longer than expected. The
. u
i
. '; i e n l grid should be issued in October. !
Part 2 - Develop and Implement Nuclear Decision Grids
- 1. This part began in September. The project team has been identified. Scheduled completion is December 13, 1985.
PROJECT I.8 - EVALUATE STAFF RETENTION - Carrie Gaudreau
- 1. This project is new. . It will address an apparent problem of greater staff turnover than other parts of the company. Assembly of data has taken longer than expected and the project completion date has been extended to October 31.
u
PROJECT II - MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
SUMMARY
The framework for Master Planning and Scheduling and division planning and scheduling has been established.
Reports documenting these functions have been prepared.
Implementation has been impacted by the Environmental Qualification program activities. Functions of the Performance Enhe.ncement Program will be merged into Master Planning and' Scheduling in October. Interfaces with divisional planning and scheduling functions will be established as each becomes more formalized during implementation.
PROJECT II.1 - ESTABLISH NUCLEAR MASTER PLANNING AND SCHEDULING - Doug Picard
- 1. A discussion outline describing Master Planning and Scheduling (MP&S) was prepared in June and discussed ,
with division personnel. Based upon feedback from i the divisions, a need for a report describing MP&S was identified. j
- 2. An MP&S report has been drafted and is being finalized.
- 3. A policy supporting both MP&S and divisional planning !
and scheduling has been prepared and is being routed for approval. This project will.be complete when the new policy is issued.
PROJECT II.2 -
DEVELOP ANNUAL AND LONG-RANGE SCHEDULES -
Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Schedule - Complete
- 1. An initial schedule was prepared and issued in June.
The schedule includes the next two planned outages with anticipated change notices and other known divisional items.
- 2. This schedule will be revised as the divisional planning and scheduling functions get in place. ,
PROJECT II.3 - IMPLEMENT PLANNING AND SCHEDULING METHODS AND PROCEDURES - Doug Picard Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete
- 1. The definition of planning and scheduling by each division has been completed. A report was prepared summarizing the. approaches being taken by each division. Additionally, a report was prepared (by u
S.M. Stoller) defining Planning and Scheduling within the Nuclear Engineering Division.
- 2. The implementation approach has been modified and has been split into four sub-parts by division.
Part 2 - NED Implementation - R. Craun
- 1. The implementation plan for NED's planning and scheduling has been finalized.
- 2. A review of PC-based scheduling systems was completed in August. Two IBM mainframe systems (Project-2 and PREMIS) have been evaluated and PREMIS has been selected.
- 3. The project is being impacted within the division by EQ efforts. However, planning and scheduling methods and procedures are being used for EQ projects.
Part 3 - NLF Implementation - R. Husted
- 1. The start-up of this part has been delayed until the person responsible for this activity had joined the company. An Action Plan has now been prepared for the implementation effort. Completion is scheduled for January 15, 1986.
Part 4 - QA Implementation - M. Ferris
- 1. Progress on this project has been limited during the last two months. An Action Plan is being prepared to solidify implementation steps.
Part 5 - NPD Implementation - W. Franek
- 1. Progress on this project has been limited by the current lack of personnel and emphasis on the EQ program. An initial Action Plan has been prepared for the project. Our intention is to tie this project's activities into the next Outage Planning i Cycle that begins after start-up and resolution of EQ.
PROJECT II.4 EVALUATE MP&S FOR FOSSIL - D. Picard
- 1. This is a new project identified in Project II.1, Establish Nuclear Master Planning and Scheduling Function, and will determine how MP&S can be adapted to Fossil Production. The project is scheduled for late 1986.
L
E.
J PROJECT III - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
SUMMARY
The PM planning and scheduling organization and Delays responsibilities were defined and approved in July.
i have been experienced in actually filling the approved
- personnel positions. The positions are expected to be filled by October 31. Good progress is being made in the
~
! development of PM procedures. A revised development approach has been taken which is described in Project III.3, j
Develop Preventive Maintenance Engineering Program.
PROJECT III.1 - ESTABLISH MAINTENANCE PLANNING GROUP - Dave i Miller
- 1. Positions for- the Maintenance Planning Group were
+
defined in Project III.2, Define Maintenance Planning i and Scheduling Function, Part 1, Initial Definition.
The Personnel Information Questionnaires (PIQ's) have been prepared and approved.
~
- 2. Interviews and staff selection is now underway.
Project completion has been extended to October 31.
f PROJECT III.2 - DEFINE MAINTENANCE PLANNING AND SCHEDULING
- FUNCTION - Dave Miller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete
- 1. A report was submitted in June and approved in July.
It defines the maintenance planning and scheduling organization.
Part 2 - Implementation i 1. Progress has- been hindered due to the delays in filling- the approved positions. Although some
, progress has been made in the last few months, the i majority of work will be completed in the final i quarter of the year. Completion is still scheduled for January 3, 1986.
PROJECT III.3 - DEVELOP PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING l
PROGRAM - Frank Novachek j Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete
- 1. Administrative Procedure, P-12 (Plant Maintenance-Mechanical, Electrical and Relay Shop) has been revised and several Level II procedures have been ,
issued. :
)
- 2. A writers guide for maintenance ' procedures was l prepared and issued. ,
L
.,3
- 3. Mobil Oil representatives completed an audit of lubricrating practices for rotating equipment in June.
- 4. The approach to implementation has been revised per our letter, P-85270 (July 31, 1985) to the NRC. The revisions are described below.
Part 2 - PM Development, Existing Critical Significant Components
! 1. The scope of this project part has been reduced (and renamed) to include only the redevelopment of PM
> procedures that had previously been in existence. It includes PM and IEC calibration procedures.
- 2. The revision of I&C calibration procedures is 55%
complete.
- 3. 64 of the_310 existing PM procedures have been rewritten and 44 more are in progress.
- 4. Review and approval of procedures is being hindered by reviewers' involvement in EQ related activitics.
Part 3 - PM Development, Remainder of Critical Significant Components
- 1. The scope of this project part has also been reduced to include Critical Significant Components that had not been defined previously. This includes the development- of approximately 360 additional procedures.
- 2. The remaining significant components 'are being addressed via Trend Analysis Reporting. PM procedures will be developed based upon the need as indicated by the trends.
- 3. The schedule for this part has been revised to begin January, 1986 with completion scheduled for December i 31, 1986.
Part 4 - Post Maintenance Testing Procedure - Complete i
- 1. Two Station Manager Administration Procedures (SMAP) were developed to cover post maintenance testing procedures.
i
' Part 5 - Revise Maintenance Procedures
- 1. A subcontractor is assisting with the revision of
- these procedures.
L
s
- 2. This project is now 30% complete.
4 PROJECT III.4 - EVALUATE DAVIS-BESSE EVENT - D. Picard
- 1. This project will evaluate the Toledo-Edison Davis-Besse loss. of feedwater event and determine any action items for FSV.
- 2. The project is scheduled to begin in September and finish January 3, 1986. A multi-divisional project team has been identified.
l l
t t
i I
i t
s 5
I I
l L - . - .
- l l
.~
PROJECT IV - UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES i
SUMMARY
Several projects have been hindered by attention to EQ issues which has caused the approval cycle for procedures, policies, etc. to be slowed. The schedules for three new projects (IV.7, IV.9 and IV.10) identified in our last status report have been established.
PROJECT IV.1 - REVIEW AND REVISE DESIGN CHANGE MODIFICATION PROCESS - Jack Reesy
- 1. The task force has visited several other utilities and reviewed their design change procedures.
- 2. A revision to engineering procedure, ENG-1, has been drafted by the task force. This procedure will include regulatory requirements with most PSC requirements being included in an Engineering Directives manual.
- 3. The proposed changes to CN procedures will be presented to management in early October.
PROJECT IV.2 - IMPLEMENT COMMITMENT CONTROL PROGRAM - Dave Goss
- 1. The commitment control procedures of other utilities have been reviewed. One utility was visited.
- 2. A Commitment Control Policy and Level II procedures have been issued.
- 3. A Level I Commitment Control Procedure has been developed and is in the approval process. Approval hcs been delayed due to the priority of EQ issues.
PROJECT IV.3 -
DOCUMENT PROCEDURES FOR REGULATORY CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW - Dave Goss
- 1. The same Level I procedure referred to in Project IV.2, Implement Commitment Control Program, is being used to describe the review of regulatory correspondence. This project will be completed when the procedure is approved.
PROJECT IV.4 - REVIEW ESSENTIAL REGULATORY DOCUMENTS - Mike Holmes
- 1. Earlier concerns expressed in the May 31 status report were resolved.
- 2. An engineering firm was hired to assist with the re-review of essential regulatory documents (Generic C
Letters, I&E Bulletins and Regulatory Guides).
Approximately 95% of the documents from 1980 through 1985 have been reviewed.
- 3. This project is also creating a new ongoing obligations catalog with an improved format.
- 4. A Part 2, Define Additional Ongoing Obligations, has been defined. This project will review the FSAR, Commitment Log and 10CFR documents to identify ongoing obligations not previously defined. This project will add new items to the catalog created in Part 1. Completion is scheduled for June, 1986.
PROJECT IV.5 - REVIEW AND REVISE NUCLEAR PRODUCTION PROCEDURES - Chuck Fuller Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete
- 1. The initial definition was completed in June. It identified the scope of the procedures rewrite to include Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) and Results Procedures (RP's).
- 2. Work in the revision of procedures identified the need for revisions to Emergency Procedures (EP's) because there is a strong interrelationship between the SOP's and the EP's. The EP revision has been established as Part 3 and is scheduled for completion in July, 1986.
Part 2 - Nuclear Production Procedures Development
- 1. Outside contractors have been selected to help with the procedures revision. A writers guide has also been prepared to direct SOP rewrite efforts.
- 2. The review of revised procedures has fallen behind schedule due to the reviewers' involvement in EQ activities.
PROJECT IV.6 - REVIEW AND REVISE EXCLUSION LIST AND RELATED PROCEDURES - T. Prenger
- 1. Two consulting firms are assisting with this project.
- 2. Administrative Procedure, Q-4 (Procurement and Document Control) is being revised and the Exclusion List is being moved to a new Level II procedure. A first draft of the new Exclusion List and Level II procedures has been prepared.
- 3. Completion of this project has been extended to November 15.
u
.'3 PROJECT IV.7 -
REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS -
Jim 4
Gramling Part 1 - Develop and Submit for NRC Approval
- 1. To date, 75 of 81 Specifications have been submitted l
. to plant management for approval.
- 2. The date for submittal to the NRC of the Final Draft
[ has been extended from October 15 to November 27.
i Delay has resulted from plant management's attention j to re-start and EQ issues.
l' 3, Expected formal _ submittal of the revised Technical Specifications is April 30, 1986. This allows time '
for incorporation of NRC comments into the Final l Draft.
i l PROJECT IV.8 -
REVIEW AND REVISE ENGINEERING PROCEDURES -
Mike Daum ;
l Part 1 - Revise Procedures
- 1. All 10 ENG procedures have been revised.
i, ,
l 2. 5 of 10 STD procedures have been revised.
1 Part 2 - Develop Procedure Training Outlines j 1. Based upon a revised training approach, this project part is being redefined and moved to Project V.5, Improve NED Training. ;
! 2. Instead of Procedure Training Outlines (PTO's),
I lesson plans will be developed to be consistent with Training System Development and INPO guidelines. .
PROJECT IV.9 - REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I PLANT PROCEDURES (P
& G) - Jack Gahm i
- Part 1 - Revise 'P' Procedures - C. Fuller
- 1. An Action Plan was submitted. Based upon the Action Plan and availability of staff for the project, a completion date of July 31, 1986 has been established.
- 2. Administrative Procedure, P-2 (Equipment Clearances
- and operation Deviations) has been revised (but not issued). Work has begun on P-5 (Material Control) and P-8 (Fire Prevention and Fighting) .
f Part 2 -' Revise 'G' Procedures - Frank Novachek I
u
- 1. This schedule been established. Procedures drafts are to be completed by March 1, 1986, but final approval and training should require until July, 1986.
PROJECT IV.10 - REVIEW AND REVISE LEVEL I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES - Mike Ferris
- 1. The schedule of this project has been established to be consistent with Project IV.9, Review and Revise Level I Plant Procedures. i f !
i 1
e i
l 1
i
~ PROJECT V - IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR DIVISION TRAINING
SUMMARY
One of the original nine projects is complete. A major milestone has been reached on the Operator Accreditation program - the Self Evaluation Reports were submitted to INPO.
PROJECT V.1 - CONDUCT MANAGEMENT SKILLS UPGRADE - Martin McNultt-Part 1 - Initial Definition
- 1. The Wilson Survey individual needs assessments were completed at the end of July. This defined the training needs of each management individual.
- 2. A management training policy has been prepared and '
now approved by management. The policy, Managerial Competencies,-should be issued in October.
Part 2 - Implementation
- 1. The development plans for the Nuclear Production Division are being finalized.
- 2. Two three-day management training sessions have been scheduled.
PROJECT V.2 - REVIEW MEMBERSHIP IN INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS -
Larry Brey - Complete
- 1. A policy was issued in July addressing participation by PSC' personnel in industry and standards organizations.
PROJECT V.3 - ENHANCE 10CFR50.59 TRAINING - Mike Holmes t Part 1 - Conduct Training - Jeff Johns - Complete
- 1. Procedures and guidelines for 10CFR50.59 safety evaluation have been received- from other utilities and used to develop training instruction.
- 2. Training for safety evaluations has been completed for Nuclear Licensing and Fuels division personnel.
- 3. Training in the STAIRS text data base has also been conducted.- This project part is now complete. i c
4 Part 2 - Update Text Data Base - Dave Goss i
i 1. Progress is being made in updating the text data base j (STAIRS) with missing P and G correspondence. The 1985 P and G correspondence has been entered. Work is beginning on 1984 and 1983 correspondence.
j Part 3 - Train NED Personnel - Jeff Johns
- 1. Part 3 of this project has been added to train NED personnel in completing safety evaluations. This part is scheduled to be completed on October 15.
}-
i PROJECT V.4 - IMPROVE QUALITY ASSURANCE DIVISION TRAINING -
1 M. Ferris l Part 1 - Initial Definition - Complete l
! Part 2 - Implementation
! 1. The approach and schedule of this project has changed j again. The project has now been organized using i INPO's Training System Development (TSD) methodology.
i Projected completion iP now September 1, 1986. The i use of TSD has expanded the work required.
l 2. Progress in recent months has been limited by not j having personnel to dedicate full-time. An outside I contractor has now been hired to assist.
i i PROJECT V.5 - IMPROVE NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DIVISION TRAINING j - Mike Daum i
Part 1 - Initial Definition 1.'A new training services engineer has been hired.
[
. 2. The project will use TSD in developing the overall programs..
l 3. A " Training Needs Survey" has been distributed and analyzed. It prioritizes the needs of NED as a j whole.
1 Part 3 - Complete Procedure Training Lesson Plans ,
i 1. This part 'was transferred from Project IV.8, Review l and Revise Nuclear Engineering Procedures. Lesson
~
plans are being developed instead of Procedure Training Outlines to be consistent with TSD andINPG i guidelines.
{
l 3
6 m
_ _ . . _ . _ . ~ _ . . .. _ _ _ _ __ _ _ . . _
b.'.
1 PROJECT V.6 -
IMPROVE LICENSING AND FUELS TRAINING - Bob Husted Part 1 - Ipitial Definition - Complete
. 1. Tha Analysis Phast (Job and Task Analysis) of TSD has I
been completed and a report issued describing the t
scope of the training program. '
i I
- 2. September, 1986 has been established as the
! completion of Part 2, Implementation.
! PROJECT V.7 - DEVELOP NUCLEAR PRODUCTION DIVISION TRAINING j FOR INPO ACCREDITATION - Ted Borst j Exhibit II shows each job position, its schedule, and i progress to completion.
j Pgrt 1 - Operator Accreditation Traininq
! 1. .The Self Evaluation Reports have been submitted to INPO for the three operator positions. The training materials need to be complete by year-end.
- 2. Progress on the Non-Licensed Operator position has been impacted the most by EQ. The necessary. actions required to complete this project by year-end have
! been identified.
j Part 2 - Non-Operator Accreditation
- 1. Continued good progress on these seven positions.
l The project is presently ahead of schedule.
PROJECT V.8 -
CONSOLIDATE SITE TRAINING -
Ted Borst -
, Complete l 1. The necessary procedure revisions were completed in June to meet the project's objectives.
j PROJECT V.9 - RETRAIN LICENSED PERSONNEL - Ted Borst i 1. This project parallels the efforts in Project V.7,
! Develop Nuclear Production Training for' INPO i- Accreditation, Part 1, Operator Training. The i training being developed for the operators wl11 be
- used in the retraining program.
i i
c --
i PROJECT VI - PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS
SUMMARY
To date, we have completed four of the original seven projects. EQ efforts have affected progress on the remaining three projects.
PROJECT VI.1 - FORMALIZE PLANT TOUR PROCEDURES AND REPORTING
- Chuck Fuller - Complete
- 1. A Management Tour policy was issued in July and a Station Manager Administrative Procedure (SMAP) to support the policy.
PROJECT VI.2 -
REVISE CONDUCT OF PLANT OPERATIONS - Chuck Fuller - Complete
- 1. Administrative Procedure, P-1 (Plant Operations), two SMAP's and a Support Services Manager Administrative Procedure (SUSMAP) were issued to complete this project.
PROJECT VI.3 - DOCUMENT SUPERVISOR RESPONSIBILITIES - Chuck Fuller - Complete
- 1. A Station Manager Administrative procedure was issued to document supervisor responsibilities.
PROJECT VI.4 -
IMPLEMENT PLANT SIGNAGE PROGRAM - Chuck Fuller
- 1. This project has fallen behind schedule due to attention required on EQ issues and loss of key personnel assigned to the project.
PROJECT VI.5 - COMPLETE FACILITIES PLANNING STUDY - Frank Novachek - Complete
- 1. A consultant's report that recommended space needs was revised based upon PSC input and finalized.
- 2. Interim space needs are being obtained for site assigned personnel.
- 3. Capital expenditures for a new maintenance facility are being evaluated.
- 4. There were no space needs identified in Project I.6, Evaluate Engineering and Licensing and Fuels at FSV, that impacted this study.
L
i l
. . l c;
PROJECT VI.6 - IMPROVE PARTS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - Jack Reesy
- 1. Several consultant's have recommended changes in procurement procedures. This information is being t used for improving parts management.
- 2. Most of the plant's procedures have been reviewed.
- 3. The scheduled completion date has been revised to December 31, 1985 due to the impact of EQ.
PROJECT VI.7 - ESTABLISH COMPONENT SHELF-LIFE PROGRAM - Jack Reesy/ Mike Niehoff Part 1 - Complete Aging Study - Mike Niehoff
- 1. The aging analysis was completed by Wyle Labs. This information is being evaluated and analyzed by Sargent and Lundy. They will recommend a shelf-life program.
- 2. Project completion has been delayed to October 31, 1985.
Part 2 - Install Component Shelf-Life Program - Jack Reesy
- 1. The approach will be developed by Sargent and Lundy.
l I
f 4
l i
L- - - . . . - _ . -
PUBLICSERVICECOMPANYOFCOLORADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM QUARTERLYSTATUSREPORT OCTOBER 11,1985 ,
l W E
= $
E g a 5 W 7 E WI" 5 ei wa s
W W- Ec R$ E l
5 ME g!ag@hM$
n le ilpsa!gees sis -
5 -s ag<
- 8 m g l
l o gg e a -
ga r
- a. -
58 _g5 =s"_ =
8 kb v 5 hSB,,
h U -
m
o a
l l Z M
LM U
Z O
O J
C Z
g o mg 4 :>-
C "
N -
== s Z
go $
C E0 vW g
l M $M gm o =
i ad m_
bili mm o . _5 U $$
w 5
o g
E.
u E
g . .
L
~
r e
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM -
SUMMARY
SCHEDULE ,
PROJP.CT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D Q1 Q2 03 Q4
' f I. ORCANIZATIONAL CONCERNS W M - Mled Timetable I.1 E.2 Formalize Action Plan, peor- D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF ganization and Performance MXH0 = Schskled Tuuntable Enhancement Program with undefared cxan-pletion data prxx = rinished work within I.2 A.I Document Charters. Miasionc this schmkle and Funetion Statenents Part 1, Develop Charters D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFF xxIE = Ext,inded scheihte Part 2, Update Procedures D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF taynt original tune-table I.3 A.9 Ekx usent Policy on Conusuni- M. Eachary Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF xx- = sctuskie has float time cation and Staff Meetings co mmet ortginal screaae Projects starts or finishes later or earlier than 1.4 E.1 Evaluate Staffing Levels C. Caudreau P I **d-Part 1, Fvaluate and Approve Complete FFFF Staffing Part 2, Hire New Personnel May 1 Nov 29 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFN KXXXXXXX I.5 3.6 Complete Nuclear Production J. Gahm Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Organizational Changes I.G E.3 Evaluate Engineering and D. Warembourg Complete FFFFFFFFFF E.4 Licensing and Fuels at Fort St. Vrain I.7 Complete 7rganization D. Picard Decision G* ids Part 1 - I element Corporate Jul 1 Oct 18 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFF EEE Crid Part 2 - Develop and Implement Sep 3 Dec 13 FFFF EXXXXXXXXX Nuclear Decision Crids I.8 Evaluate Staff Retention C. Caudreau Jul 1 Oct 31 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFF t'EEE Ik
e_.
O e 6 l*e #,
1 i
E
= g sammel - ,
4 3 $
C2 LAJ D "Z:: d Q -
L/1 S h *
- m We o B l
z M
w -
z g i e J MM CL. $ 3E
= w Ee L.LI w b- g L/1 -
C ad $
E I
8 E71 EeE
= 5 g
- 5; -
o w a k
s' w
S .
o .
N CL
r .
.* e o
PU;t.lc SFRVICE COMPANY OF CO!ICADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM SupWLARY SCHEDt:1.E ,
PROJECT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDULED 1985 1986 PDO- NUS MAN-JECT REF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D Q1 02 Q) Q4
'If II. MASTER PI.ANNING AND SCHEDULING II.1 A.2 Establish Nuclear Master D. Picard Apr 1 Oct 18(RIFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFfl REE Planning and Scheduling Function 11.2 A.4 Develop Annual and Long- C. Fuller Range Schedules Part 1, Initial Schedule Complete FFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Complete Schedule Dependent-II.3 OXX(EST)XX0 11.3 A.2 Implement Planning and Sche-duling Methods & Proceduren Part 1, Initial Definition D. Picard Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, NPD Implementation R. Craun Aug 5 Apr 1986 FFFFFFXXX CXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 3, NLF Implementation .R. Husted Sep 30 Jan 15 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 4. QA Implementation M. Ferris Aug 5 Jan 3 1986 XXXX(EST) (XXXXXXXXXXO Part 5, NPD Implementation W. Franek Aug 5 Apr 1986 XXXXX(EST lXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXO II.4 Evaluate MP&S For Fossil D. Picard Oct 1986 Dec 1986 XXX0 Ak
Ol e *.
e CD l Z
ci o
U"I ots CD Z 9
- gs Z g W"
-g
<x: -
g8 ,
J g - -
o- g Em l Z
m gsm -
M
' $E E
-5 3
- R $s
- g a
- =
E R
>- g a 8
O i E
LAJ 8
~~) . . .
O QC CL.
e PIrDI.IC SERVICE COMPANY OF t'Ot.O! ADO
- PERFORMANCE ENNANCEMENT PPOCHAM
SUMMARY
SCHEDUI.E .
PRCA!_FCT TIMETABLE EST. SCHf:DUI.FI) 1985 l #J 36 PRO- NUS MAN- l l J F.CT EEP. DF.SCHIPTION RESFONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D Q1 07 03 04
- - - _i- __ _
III. ESTAliLISH PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE Pl. ANTEING AND SCHEDUIIE III.I R.2 Establish Maintenance D. Miller Apr i Oct 31 (RI FFFFFFFFITFFFFFF FFFFXXXN EEEE Planning Crriup III.2 G.3 Defina Maintenance Planning D. Miller and Scheduling Function Part I, Initial Definition Corglete FFFFFFFFFFFITF Part 2 Implementation Jul 15 Jan 3 t *TFFFXXXz KXXXXXXXXXXX III.3 0.4 Develop Preventive Mainte- F. Novachek nance Engineering Program Part I, initlaI Definition Corsplete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, PM Development, Aug 5 Jen 3 FFFFFFXN EXXXXXXXXXXX Existing Critical Signifi-cant components Part 3, PM Development, Jan 1986 Dec 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Remainder of Critical Significant Components Part 4, Post Maintenance Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Testing Procedure Part 5 Revise Maintenanca Procedures Jul I Jan 3 FFFFFFFXXXXN EXXXXXXXXXXX III.4 Evaluate Davis-Besse Event D. Picard Sep 3 Jan 3 FFFM EXXXXXXXXXXX AN
6 e
i
@ h LaJ d m
~
2 Q llll3 d 1 O 5 w
U O
E CL. g o
' w W $$
@ e '
! W 5' g
2 u 5
~
l I E m g D
b gg <
bd
~
m .
O b $7 i w a n CR 8'i o . . .
I E CL.
PUitt.lO SERVICE COMPANY OF COlJ)PADO '
PFRFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM St1MMARY SCHEDULE g PROJF.CT TiMETARLE F:ST. SCHEDUI.ED 1985 1986 ,__
PRO- NUS MAN-JECT IEF. DESCRIPTION RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLf.TF A M J J A S O N D O' 02 01 Q4 NF IV. UPGRADE NUCLEAR POLICIES AND PROCEDURES IV.1 0.1 Review and Revise Design J. Reesy Apr I . tan 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFIFFFFFFF KXXXXXXXXXXX A.5 Change Modification Process IV.2 C.1 Implement NRC Commitment D. Coss Apr 1 Oct I S (R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFF rITF FFEEEE EEE Control Program IV.3 C.2 Document Procedures for D. Coss Apr 1 Oct 18(R)FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEEEE REZ Regulatory Correspondence Review IV.4 C.3 Review Essential Regulatory M. Holmes Documents Part 1, Review Essentinl May i Nov I FFFETFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF KXXX Regulatory Documents Part 2, D$rfine Additional Or:- Oct 1 Jun 1986 EXX(ESTlXXXXXXXXXXXXX0 going obligations IV.5 A.6 Review and Revise Nuclear Production Procedures Part 1, Inittal Detinition C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFF Part 2, Nuclear Production C. Fuller Jul 1 Jan 3 FFFITFFFFFI TGXXXXXXXXXX Procedures Development Part 3, Review and Revise C. Fuller Aug 2 Jul 1996 FFFFFFfT CXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Caergency Procedures IV.6 Review and Revise Exclusion T. Prenger Apa I Nov 15 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFTSEEEEE List and Related Procedures IV.7 Revise Technical Specifi-cations Part 1, Develop and Submit J. Gramling Apr ! Apr 30(R) FFFF FFFTFFF FFFFFFFFFFFXX KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX fc,r NRC Approval Part 2 Implement and C. Fuller May 1 (R) Next XXX(ESTiXXXX0 Train at Plant Refueling IV.8 Review and Revise Nuclear M. Daum Engineering Division Procedures Part 1, Revise Procedures May 1 Apr 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFETFFFFFFF KXXXX%XXXXXXXXX IV.9 Review and Revise Level I Plant Proced' ares (P & C)
Part 1 Revise 'P' Procedure C. Fuller Sep 3 Jul 1986 FFXM KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXXXX Part 2, Revise 'G' Procer'ure F. Novachek Sep 3 Jul 1986 FFXM EXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IV.10 Review and Revise Level I M. Ferris Sep 3 Jul 1996 XXXMKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX i Jb OA Procedures (Q)
.J
- - _ - .a a e S O 6 e I
o Lt1 m
LhJ e p
tri C LaJ a
Lt1 o
w
>= .
W
=
U v c G v
.gg LaJ U
C.,p -
s CBC:
a-Z 5 5 -
,,,,a -
a z
5 W M C
c "
s-L W
QC 2 o i m
~
n
~
l h o Y
4 tad:
=> ?
m m u LaJ . .
g,j w W
C) $ 0 h
=
w =
g M o G - -
C3C Q
,a e
PttDLic SERVICE COMPANY OF COI.ORADO PFFFORMANCE ENitAtJCEMENT PPOGRAM ,
SUMMARY
SCilEDUI.E e
PROJECT TIMETABLE EST. SCitEDUtED 1985 1986 _
PRO- NUS MAN-RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D 01 02 03 04 JECT REF. DESCRIPTION V. IMPROVE MANAGEMENT AND NUCLEAR III~ VISION PERSONNEI. TRAINING V.1 A.3 C0nduct Management Skills M. McNulty itpgrade Part 1 Initial Definition Complete FFFFFFFFFFITFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Auo 5 Jan 3 FFFXXN (EST)XXXXXXXX V.2 A.10 Review Membership in L. Brey Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Industry Organizationn V.3 B.7 Enhance 10CFR50.59 Training Part 1, Conduct Training J. Johns Complete FFtfFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Update Text Data D. Goss Apr i Dec 1986 FFFFFFFETFFFFFFFFFFFXXXM KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Base Part 3, Train NED Personnel J. Johns Sep 3 Oct 15 XXX) KX V.4 D.I Improve Quality Assurance M. Ferris D.2 Division Training D.4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete FFFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Jun 3 Sep I 1986 (R) FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE V.5 D.1 Improve Nuclear Engineering M. Daum D.2 Divinion Training D.4 Part I, Initial Definition Apr 1 Nov I FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFKXXX Part 2, Implementation Nov 4 Determined XXXXX(ESTlXXXX0 in Part 1 Part 3. Complete Procedure Oct 14 Jun 1986 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Lesson Plans V.6 D.1 Improve Licensing and Fuels R. Husted D.2 Division Training D4 Part 1, Initial Definition Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF Part 2, Implementation Sep 2 Sep 30 1986 FFFF KXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX V.7 D.1 Develop Nuclear Production T. Borst D.2 Division Training for INPO D.3 Accreditation D.4 Part 1, Operator Accredita- Apr 1 Jan 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXX KXXXXXXXXXXXX tion Training Part 2, Non-Operator Accre- Jul 1 Dec 1986 FFFFFFFFFFFF PFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ditation Training V.8 D.5 Consolidate S,ite Training T. Borst Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF V.9 D.6 Retrain Licensed Personnel T. Borst Part 1, Training Program May 6 Jan 3 FFFFFFFPFFFFFFXXXXXX (XXXXXXXXXXX Development Part 2. Conduct Training Jan 1986 Sep 1986 db XXFXXXXXXXXXXXX
r e
- S 8I G l
l N
Z O
C QC LLI CL.
O l.L ;
O P-O
':')
E o
O P- to!
E C er l
V Q
I g il5 '
=== :=: S
)
b4 h
>- w -
O he LaJ g W
.> m s o . .
OC O
u y
)
. ,1 9
PUI1LIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COIORADO PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMFNT PROGHAM =
SUMtARY SCHEDUI.I' e
PROJECT TIMETABLE EST. SCHEDUI.ED 1985 1986 PRO- NUS MAN-RESPONSIBLE DAYS START COMPLETE A M J J A S O N D Q1 02 03 04 JECT REF. DESCRIPTION VI. PLANT CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS VI.1 A.8 Pormalize Plant Tour Proce- C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF dures and Reporting VI.2 Revise Conduct of Operations C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFFITFFFFFFFFIT VI.3 Document Supervisor C. Fuller Complete FFFFFFFFFFFF Responsibilities VI.4 Implement Plant Signage C. Fuller Apr 1 Jan 3 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXF KXXXXXXXXXXXX Program Complete Facilities Planning F. Novachek Complete FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF VI.5 Study VI.6 Improve Parts Management J. Reesy System EEEEEEEEFEEE Part 1, Initial Assessment Apr I Dec 31(R)----FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXX Part 2, Implementation Jan 5 Determined in Part I XXX(EST)XXX0 VI.7 Establish Component Shelf-Life Program
< Part I, Complete Aging M. Nichoff Apr 1 Nov 1 (R)--------FFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXRFEE Study XXXXXXXXXXXXX Part 2, Install Component J. Reesy Nov 14R) Mar 31 1986 Shelf-Life Program dk I
4
3
~. .
i
+ ;
F
~
Public Service Company of Colorado ,
Performance Enhancement Program Project V.7 - Develop Nuclear Production Division Training for INPO Accreditation Percent Complete Schedule Project Timetable Anlys Desgn Devel Eval Start Submit Comp! 1985 - 1986 Proj Description sum Phase Phase Phase Phase SER SER(*) (8) M/J J/A S/O N/D J/F M/A N/J J/A S/O N/D q p Part 1 Operator Accreditation 1 Non Licensed Reactor Operator 57 75 25 58 80 100 !!/84 9/85 12/85 FFFFFFXXX3NXXXXX 8
- 2. Licensed Reactor Operator 75 100 100 65 80 100 1/85 9/85 12/85 FFFFFFFFFFMXXXXX
- 8
- 3. Senior Reactur Operator & 45 100 25 33 80 100 3/85 9/85 12/85 FFFFFFFFFF KXXXXX a
3 Shift Supervisor P*rt 2 Non-operator Accreditation
- 4. Chemistry Technician 25 55 8 25 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 8
- 5. Electrical Maintenance Personnel 18 50 10 15 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- f 40 55 15 26 80 70 1/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFF FFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 6. Mechanical Maintenance Personnel
- 5 20 '20 15 30 80 70 12/84 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFPPFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
.7. Technical Advisors
- f 47 70 13 35 80 70 3/85 9/86 12/06 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 8. Instrument Technician
- 8 Radiological Protection Tech. 40 45 7 33 80 70 6/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
- 9. f
- 10. Technical Staff & Managers il 10 7 25 80 73 6/85 9/86 12/86 FFFFFFFFFF FFFFFFXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 0
dL (1) Note: Schedule is for sutimitting the Self Evaluatson Report (SER) to INPO and implementing the training programs at PSC
- not for achieving INPO Board Accreditation.
i
_ _ _ _