ML20206E005: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20206E005
| number = ML20206E005
| issue date = 07/27/1988
| issue date = 07/27/1988
| title = Responds to 880719 Ltr Enclosing Prior Correspondence W/Nrc Re Conditions at Ref Plants & 10CFR50.54(x) & (Y).Issues Raised Will Be Given Wide Dissemination in Fr & Careful Consideration by NRC
| title = Responds to Enclosing Prior Correspondence W/Nrc Re Conditions at Ref Plants & 10CFR50.54(x) & (Y).Issues Raised Will Be Given Wide Dissemination in Fr & Careful Consideration by NRC
| author name = Zech L
| author name = Zech L
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
| author affiliation = NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8811170355
| document report number = NUDOCS 8811170355
| title reference date = 07-19-1988
| package number = ML20206D924
| package number = ML20206D924
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
Line 29: Line 30:
==Dear          ng:==
==Dear          ng:==
[
[
,              I have received your July 19,1988 letter enclosing a series of prior                                                                                ,
,              I have received your {{letter dated|date=July 19, 1988|text=July 19,1988 letter}} enclosing a series of prior                                                                                ,
correspondence witn the Nuclear Regulatory Cossnission concerning conditions at the Quad Cities and Dresder. Stations and NRC regulation 10CFR50.54(x)and(y). Unfortunatsly the hRC has no record of receiving your April 29, 1988 letter, and July 7,1988 letter enclosing                                                                              ,
correspondence witn the Nuclear Regulatory Cossnission concerning conditions at the Quad Cities and Dresder. Stations and NRC regulation 10CFR50.54(x)and(y). Unfortunatsly the hRC has no record of receiving your {{letter dated|date=April 29, 1988|text=April 29, 1988 letter}}, and {{letter dated|date=July 7, 1988|text=July 7,1988 letter}} enclosing                                                                              ,
two reports on the accident at Three Mile Island. I have. therefore, asked the NRC staff to consider the infarmation contained in those letters.
two reports on the accident at Three Mile Island. I have. therefore, asked the NRC staff to consider the infarmation contained in those letters.
i i
i i

Latest revision as of 12:45, 6 December 2021

Responds to Enclosing Prior Correspondence W/Nrc Re Conditions at Ref Plants & 10CFR50.54(x) & (Y).Issues Raised Will Be Given Wide Dissemination in Fr & Careful Consideration by NRC
ML20206E005
Person / Time
Site: Dresden, Quad Cities, 05000000
Issue date: 07/27/1988
From: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Cale Young
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
Shared Package
ML20206D924 List:
References
NUDOCS 8811170355
Download: ML20206E005 (1)


Text

_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _-_ __ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ __

sa mee

/

j'

  • o UNITS 0 STATES '

, ,, a NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION wasniNotoN, o c. nsss 2,

  1. July 27, 1988

. . . . . .o g CHAIRMAN a

lir. Charles Young 262 Sheffield Lane r Glen Ell n, IL 60137

Dear ng:

[

, I have received your July 19,1988 letter enclosing a series of prior ,

correspondence witn the Nuclear Regulatory Cossnission concerning conditions at the Quad Cities and Dresder. Stations and NRC regulation 10CFR50.54(x)and(y). Unfortunatsly the hRC has no record of receiving your April 29, 1988 letter, and July 7,1988 letter enclosing ,

two reports on the accident at Three Mile Island. I have. therefore, asked the NRC staff to consider the infarmation contained in those letters.

i i

The remaining letters in the pac!: age you sent me have been addressed by the hRC. The staff responded to your January 29 and February 24, 1988 .

letters on March 31, 1968. On July 5, you were infonned that the staff

  • i had detemined that 18, 1988 letter, which requested NRC to ,

cancel 10 CFR 50.54(your Aprilx) and (y), qua'ified as a petition for rulemaking. l

! as informed that your petition will be published in the Federg Resister  !

for public cceent in early August. Af ter the 60 day comunent period expires and the staff has completed its review uf your petition and any cossments received, we will idvise you of our decision en your proposal.

I regret any tr,convenierce that the apperent misdirection of your two letters may have caused, but I believe that the issues you have raised will be given wide dissemination in the Federal Register and careful consideration by the NRC staff.

Sincerely, A

Lando W. Zhh, Jr.

l

! est 1170355 001109 10 l DR ADOCK 0000 1

>