ML20235C613

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Re Amend 6 to PG&E Application for Bodega Bay Reactor & Notes That Amend Supersedes Amend 4. Comments on Questions Raised at Preceeding Meeting in Washington,Dc Not Completed
ML20235C613
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 03/27/1964
From: Newmark N
ILLINOIS, UNIV. OF, URBANA, IL
To: Case E
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709240508
Download: ML20235C613 (2)
v • d • e


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,

DEP ARTMENT OF civil ENGINEERING N. M. NE W M A R K, H E A D 205' Civil Engineering Hall March 27, 1964 Dr. Edson G. Case Assistant Director for Facill ties Licensing Division of Licensing and Regulation _ ,

United States Atomic Energy Commission C,  ;

Washington 25, D.C. [j t , l u ;-. .

1

Dear Dr. Case:

l This will acknowledge your letter of 24 March 1964 regarding Amendment No. 6 to the Pacific Gas and Electric Company s application 8

for the Bodega Bay Reactor. I note that this amendment supersedes Amendment No. 4 I have not yet completed my comments on the questions raised at the preceding meeting in Washington, but I expect to do so shortly.

With regard to the proposed meeting during the week of April 6th, the only date on which I can be available in Washington is April 7.

It will be impossible for me to come later during that week, and I am not sure about the following week as yet.

I have not heard f rom you regarding the other matter we discussed when I was in Washington. I should like to know what the status is of any further work that I might be doing for the Commission on related problems as I am about to make arrangements to work for one of the firms that is concerned wi th the design problems for reactors.

Sincerely yours ,

ll4O24 N. M. Newmark NMN:dp i

l l

8709240500 051217 ES -665 PDR i L .;

6 t

.g

  • s 4 e i -4

- - - . ~~~

. n. ~ y - - - n NO.

DATEO NTs DATE EC rROM.

MEMoi R EPOR T: OTHERs 8 LTR.

X ORIG.: CC: OTHER:

TO Case z & 1 COhCURNA~CE D AT E ANSWERips ACTION NECESSART

'c" *" "'"" ^" O N

" ' ""'"' O POST OFFICE F4LE CODE:

CLASSIFa I N HEG.NO: ~~

stFEnnED TO l DATE I RECEWED BY l DATE DESCRIPTION: (Muu be Uscismfied' L%F. re our 3-M 1%r 1:1 2 resangt W. Bryans ;3 31, to P00K's Ameadasut No. 6 to appl far!

the Bodega Bay Roseter. g i

ENCLOSURES l

- i t I ' ..

I i i  ! i I

'l l

HEMARKS i _.

! l I

i . 1691  ?

! l

- c. n. 4 rome ennov commnsioN 31 All, CONTilOI, FOItM ronu,.u.c, .nu .

, . . . . . . . ~ . . . T , . , ~ u n . o , ,c , , .u . u.. .

gIr m

1':

c<.f  ; - y- ,$' m / A i , / Y 6 't l

' ~~ ', , (( ' '

i' [c, np3 t

D, / bha' hey- c , .)

'55 u a, n, .s y, -

taa111. cop.zq.x. ..

g  %

/g

//ccJ',

ni aG~. ik%JarKlnly~

i cff$w /G a a ra n . w j; w w >vt' ~ h W i V O a aAed jea tG r.upd,aulli" cgCaalu ej tt p-y IL jgj'r [: ug//pd dwi M'p' '

d fc) a Ane 6Clff 'A cf cc /f rC - /?c't.d e d EK cc w D wc Q cn,/ % M - I nan:- cy it all M Aed-J' 4 pysy&kg 4 sw 1 6% nA pnu pc4 e p6Z5, 2/^c ec -~

nsa da mne. wcm in

<w wM 1 fL / ) C-r tha yca/nwxu,a ry it~- +cy wc c'w . ca/gpacip,

% 6 n n " n g g p c m < & m 3 g y o si 7pp.

V f-* llbV t'2HL., gg h as

,~ -,,

.l A cwhe tk &Jc-(g & el

&n

/k (i., yL ja. 37 ys<vzo adu. >y ird^4+J nn,/ wc" (M' f'4c< d ux J c d X /.2 se h 5 (~ d\

Udn 64-. % c c. y . 6mn -. &-

tdNse (Li ,e l' /d.u .n;a.< / f .7 7 ta -c ,efu s-frl,t-~ l/'^~7 c tm9 c ,ya e , ~ ,,

?-

1G ~pc2Ca m b.se x pmK n n .f C / cr e J.'7 ekdzc- A'ca /G- .n a 6 % ,p a f~ Ryc.L u_a / 9 s s < L.a yn -w&pf g.cu f_.

du spons,, ga ,TS /

@ & tw cc L .e 1AJdo c.nc ,1L / w 4 CL q Mg y C J-n g j-c/z tc47

<& n ,9 e{

)%w,JL JL.4, . e,+ sta f Mal eg C& uyz. fa. c2 E&&

Wz /2nd f/no c- ,

s*/r /Nesy;2- th, Nea/cM, ~,.

i r

n m m;u wm -

\

Htra ,2 9' -

pf/ua i Action by Board 9

Of Supervisors foj 1 Sonoma County Supervisors yesterday
. istrator Smith's posing of a ,

"tworbit problem" of the sher- Cs l

BURNING LAW-Were brief iff's office-the desire to buy  ;

ed on a proposed new outdoortcoffee or meals for skindivers i

' burning law by Deputy County working with officers on th e

Counsel Robert Rehberg, w h o river and the inability to charg e prepared it and who said he's them as county expenses since '

going to meet this week with they're in county meals. Con-fire district representatives. Su-I'pervisorial reaction toclusion: the pro-No change.

l posed law generally was a fear FLOOD CONDEMNATION - !

that some provisions would not Authorized condemnation ac-be enforceable. tions on a dozen parcels of land (

FLOOD PLAIN ZONE - Ap- on Santa Rosa Creek upstream :

. proved a statement to be made for about two miles from Ful-

, Wednesday to the state Senate ton rd, in an attempt to meet Factfinding Committee on Wa- federal deadllr.es for federal ter Resources on a proposed money for a channel improve-iflood plain zoning law. Drafted ment project there. The U.S.

C o n s e r y a t io n Service has by Gonlon W. Miller, chief eng

'ineer of the county wide flood set April 20 as the deadline for and water district, the state- receiving certification from the l

ment suggests softening of some county-wide district that rights of way have been secured.

!of the provisions as well as a.

UNLAME DUCK - Were told l semantic change from " zoning" by Supervisor Guidotti that al-lto the " development" of "regu lation." though he's retiring at the end '

LIBRARY - Approved H of this term he doesn't intend establishment of the North bay to behave (or be treated like):

Library System as a separate a " lame duck" supervisor, Su . i agency in a program that will pervisor Shoemaker expressed l pull many elements of the sys- appreciation of Mr. Guidotti's tem from the operations of the inclusion of his fellow super- l, cooperating libraries into a visors and county staff members l separate building as a "whole. in a statement last week that sale" library Supervisor Leigh said the county is in good shape; .

Shoemaker, who said he wanted that wasn't " idle talk," said Su..

pervisor Guidotti, who went on more time to study the proposal t declined' to vote on the ques- o describe himself as a "morei tio or less controversial figutt" t Supervisor E. J. and to speculate that his leaving (Nin) Guidotti's appraisal that will " enable the board to gain the Supreme Court decision a greater respect . . . and be turning down'an appeal by op- looked at in a different light; ponents of the Bodega Bay nuc* and create a better image . . .",

lear-fueled power plant proposal WILLOWSIDE RD. BRIDGE- '

Called for bids at 2 p.rn. April i contained it more certain language that Pacific Gas & makes 20 Yor construction of a bridge electric Co. will get permis- over Santa Rosa Creek at Wil-sion from the Atomic Energy lowside rd, as a preliminary tol

Ammicion to build thement plant /

project on the creek.the upcoming ch

_____-____s___M

g y

l

)

1 1

l l

l

r. . .  !

Earthquake' A T. 's

~D 7uhts 55 press'eP

/gfjjy..[

SF Supemsors f.  ;

Dangers Told I On A Plant Site l EDITOR: In the 1906 carth. EDITOR: Reading in the To *Vofe " - ' ~On'T;y quake Bodega Head at Bodega :

Bay was the worst shock area Paper the different views on the Bodega Head a t o m I c Bodena U A 8e-6nf! along the entire fault. In San ,

ta Rosa the earthquake was '

plant, the PG&E says that it

' is a safe and ideal spot for

. SAN FitANCISCO (UPI) worse than in San Francisco. the plant and the government -

L The San Francisco Board of There have been earth shocks says that it isn't the best spot -

Supervisors today was study- since then, and an earthquake for it. I think the public la could come at any time. But general should think twice'be .

Ing a rootion by board mem.

the PG&E has to have its own fore encouraging the go-aheadf ber Jack Morrison opposing way about ever" thing, 1 with the plant. If there is a ,

1 the constructlen of the Pro- A,t Salmon Creek at the edge fault there-and it has been posed nuclear peer plant at of the sand dunes the cracks admitted by the PG&E, Not in BodeEa Da7' go right down toward Bodega that exact spot, but how far Morrison submitted the res- Head. Some of the cracks are - from) that spot is it?

olution at the board's regular 14 feet wide. I measured them. Let's remember this: that I

.A fearful shock that it took the plant at Bodega Head is

. meeting yesterday. to crack the earth like that.

I an atomic plant and if there The proposal was sent to That would move the elec. Y ls an earthquake through that committee with hearings to tric wires on the tower and i ll reactor and the fault gives--

be held in the near future. twist the steel towers. The then what? Aren't there just The motion, which needs a } PG&E would change their as good spoti along the coast?

minds if they wers there when simply majority to ' pass the i a quake took place. When it is known that there {

is a" fault in that section, it

11. man board, would put the There is a crack don at t sure would be great to see city officially against the con. .

the bottom of the 75 feet deep ' the Bodega Head developed,

(

troversial project. reactor hole. You would be as there arc some be'autiful surprised how a quake can - scenery after you get around "I think it is vital that San I bounce things around. They' the head and get ncrt to the j Francisco make known its po- f peould r' '. to I

q ocean. But an atomic p 1 a n t i

sition to the U.S. Atomic 2 ~

there?

,- - Well, there's one thing for l 8" Energy l Cmumission," Morri-

  • 'P ained. 9 sure: If there is a. fault and ;
  • He added that he thought g{ an earthquake comes and the

' . '8 teel buiM!n i  ;

a sufficient air a W k*dd h p W doubts have been down.

' raised on conservation a n d I

j When the g 3, geological 'k let's hope the wind is blowin ,i mething, you \ west. . 5 7 -">

a gs.

kn th y ,1 Morrison indicated that the truth. 'In war it w -

' hearings would not, be held prime target for a (e,g i for at least a month, and;that j bomb to aggcra . Cos .

he was asking three weeks deep and a y so[t, .

notice so all interested parties' crete Will C -g I could attend. ,,, % f dry carth. - OHN .COX N n Fg g agg w g '

I

~. _.. $0,_ ,:-D o4e OFFICE OF THE CHAllutAN

l. 3/27 j

I (Date) l TO:

For Inform ation l

l For appropriate bandling draft For preparation of / reply for Chairman's l signature (Refer to !!anual Chapter 0740)

For discussion at Commissioners' Information Meeting For distribution to other Commi:,mioners Daily Log REMARKS

  • The Chairman asked that a very considerate rep y be prepared g i- n

'4 -

i a

, c:

I li

2

'- , /, .' ., . . . , , .

a ,,

, ,, Howard C. Erown, Jr.

.. -. 4 3o.-IEFor the Chairman

. .. .._3 13.1. _ .. --

f&

11gi-__........ A c. _g,

_ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20235C613&oldid=3294456"