ML20128P680

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Exercise Weaknesses Noted in Insp Repts 50-237/85-11 & 50-249/85-10 on 850422-24.Corrective Actions: Emergency Plan Implementing Procedure Revised to Define Requirements for Access to Technical Support Ctr
ML20128P680
Person / Time
Site: Dresden  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/28/1985
From: Farrar D
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
0313K, 313K, NUDOCS 8507260479
Download: ML20128P680 (2)


Text

r r Commonwealth Edison a One First National Plaza. Chic go Ilknois Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 June 28, 1985 Mr. James C. Keppler Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

Oresden Station Units 2 and 3 Response to GSEP Exercise Weaknesses - Inspection Report Nos. 50-237/85-011 & 50-249/85-010 NRC Docket Nos. 50-237 and 50-249 Reference (a): C. J. Paperiello letter to Cordell Reed dated May 17, 1985.

Dear Mr. Keppler:

This letter is in response to the inspection conducted by Mr. G. A.

Brown during the period of April 22 though April 24, 1985, of activities at Dresden Station. Reference (a) indicated that certain activities were identified as exercise weaknesses. The Commonwealth Edison Company response to these weaknesses is provided in Attachment A.

If you have any further questions on this matter, please direct them to this office.

Very truly yours, W.S. C D. L. Farrar Director of Muclear Licensing 1m Attachment cc: NRC Resident Inspector - Oresden

/ ' ($

.h j$

0313K 8507260479 850628 7 JLit' 1719%

PDR ADOCK 0500 G

7.-.

, /* :

...e-

.o ATTACHMENT A The.following items are responses to the weaknesses found in-the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. G.A. Brown and his associates on April 22 through April 24, 1985.

1. Weakness - Access control to the TSC was not accomplished in a timely manner nor was it performed it a satisfactory manner after it was established.

Response - EPIP 100-C7, Security Director Checklist, shall be revised to better define requirements to control access to the TSC. This will be completed by September 1, 1985.

2. Weakness - Implementation of shift staffing and augmentation was not accomplished in a timely manner. There was a breakdown in the call tree.

Response - Additional training on the operation of the call tree will be provided to Shift Engineers, Shift Control Room Engineers, Station Directors and Station Duty Supervisors. Augmentation callers will also receive this training. This training will be completed by October 1,-1985.

3. Weakness - Evacuation of non-essential personnel was not ordered in a timely manner following completion of-the simulated accountability of onsite personnel.

Response - Additional training on the requirements to evacuate non-essential personnel in a timely manner following a declaration of a Site or General Emergency will be given to Station Directors (including Shift Engineers), Security Directors and Rad-Chem Directors. 'This training will be completed by September 1, 1985: ,

4. Weakness - Poor radiological control technique was observed during the handling of the radiological injury.

Response - Additional training on surveying a potentially contaminated injured person and contamination control will be provided in the next scheduled Rad-Chen Technician training. This training will be completed by October 1, 1985.

5. Weakness - The EOF failed to provide adequately detailed followup messages in accordance with the licensee's EOF Procedure EOF-1, para-graphs 4.2.f and 5.2.f.

Response - The Station Director's Procedure, the Corporate Command Center Director's Procedure and the Recovery Manager's Procedure will be revised to provide guidance on the mechanisms that may be used to provide and to document followup information to the appropriate state agencies. These revisions will be completed by October 1, 1985.

L_