ML20235C518

Ack Receipt of AEC Re Revised Safety Review Schedule for Plant.Believes Schedule Realistic.Stresses Importance That Licensing Processes Associated W/Application Proceed as Expeditiously as Possible

ML20235C518
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, 05000449, 05000448
Issue date:	09/27/1974
From:	Dragoumis P POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To:	Deyoung R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
Shared Package
ML20235B454	List: IA-87-554, Discusses Schedule for Radiological Safety Review of Application for CPs for Plant.Summary of More Important Radiological Safety Review Milestones Encl for Info & Review ML20235B453 ML20235B509 ML20235B533 ML20235B608 ML20235B635 ML20235B672 ML20235B695 ML20235B723 ML20235B812 ML20235C029 ML20235C216 ML20235C252 ML20235C285 ML20235C322 ML20235C415 ML20235C466 ML20235C518 ML20235C752 ML20235C764 ML20235C834 ML20235C914 ML20235C965 ML20235D117 ML20235D156 ML20235D235 ML20235D302 ML20235D347 ML20235D449 ML20235D467 ML20235D541 ML20235D604 ML20235D678 ML20235D681 ML20235D695 ML20235D709 ML20235D728
References
FOIA-87-554 10135, NUDOCS 8709240476
Download: ML20235C518 (2)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

& vD

) 50-449 Esguz-./ '

3 t... r' - '

~i fkN POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY . 1900 P EN NSYLVANI A AVEN U E. N. W. WASHIN GTON. D.C. 20006 Paul onasouuts a202) 872 2338 v Cs passios=t

. NUCLs A R EhGa%f ses*eG ahD C Oktf eWC fiON September 27, 1974 /, .mri

, .EbLI

} 4g A

Mr. R. C. DeYoung, Assistant Director 0011 g r _7I for Light Water Reactors Group 1 '

Directorate of Licensing U. S. Atomic Energy Commission

,, .~ Y.

Washington, D. C. 20545 -

</

(

Dear Mr. DeYoung:

We have reviewed the Revised Safety Review Schedule for Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1 and 2 received with your letter dated September 13, 1974. We firmly believe the schedule to be realistic, and will continue to wholeheartedly support the Regulatory Staff's efforts to maintain it.

As we indicated in our meeting with the Regulatory Staff on August 2, 1974, and have reiterated on several subsequent occasions, it is of utmost importance that the licensing processes associated with our application proceed as expeditiously as possible in order l to assure the availability of Unit 1 for commercial operation in  !

1982 which is essential if system capaci.ty is to be maintained at prudent levels. This assurance can se attained only if the AEC, as well as the State of Maryland, continue the licensing review of our dockets as expeditiously as possible, while PEPCO proceeds with intensive design and engineering activities on virtually the original schedules to assure a high degree of firm engineering design which in turn will allow orderly construction planning to proceed.

As evidenced by our timely responses to the statements of outstanding concern ("open items") it is our firm intention to fully cooperate with the Staff in the resolution of outstanding matters, to enable the review of our application to proceed on this revised schedule.

Sincerely,

] .

.N fi LtI , Y

/

s q q FcI.R-1M 5 74 LOC: mas .

5 '

e C'

O//o 4

9 ~

10135 lG B709240476 G70922.

PDR FOIA MCCREA87-554 PDR

N.

J '

. c:

. George F. Trowbridge, Esq.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts &.Trowbridge 910-17th Street, N. W.

Washingten, D. C. 20006 Edward Lawson, Esq.

Special Assistant Attorney General Tawes State Office Building 580 Taylor Avenue-C4 Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Andrew P. Miller, Esq.

Attorney General Commonwealth of Virginia Supreme Court Building 1101 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Robert A.- Vanderhye , Esq.

7807 Cliffside Court Springfield, Virginia 22153 Mr. Fred Kelly Chesapeake Bay Foundation P. O. Box 1709 Annapolis, Maryland 21404 Philip J. Mause, Esq.

Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.

1525 18th Street, N. W.  ;

Washington, D. C. 20036 I

A

\

i

- __ l