ML20235D709

Advises of Oeld Concurrence on Proposed Ltr to Util Re Environ Review Schedule for Plant,Subj to Listed Observations

ML20235D709
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Sundesert
Issue date:	02/03/1978
From:	Bordenick B NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE LEGAL DIRECTOR (OELD)
To:	Leech P NRC
Shared Package
ML20235B454	List: IA-87-554, Discusses Schedule for Radiological Safety Review of Application for CPs for Plant.Summary of More Important Radiological Safety Review Milestones Encl for Info & Review ML20235B453 ML20235B509 ML20235B533 ML20235B608 ML20235B635 ML20235B672 ML20235B695 ML20235B723 ML20235B812 ML20235C029 ML20235C216 ML20235C252 ML20235C285 ML20235C322 ML20235C415 ML20235C466 ML20235C518 ML20235C752 ML20235C764 ML20235C834 ML20235C914 ML20235C965 ML20235D117 ML20235D156 ML20235D235 ML20235D302 ML20235D347 ML20235D449 ML20235D467 ML20235D541 ML20235D604 ML20235D678 ML20235D681 ML20235D695 ML20235D709 ML20235D728
References
FOIA-87-554 NUDOCS 8709250318
Download: ML20235D709 (1)

Text

, _ - _

- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ = - _ - _,

4 February 3,1978 Note to Paul Leech SUNDESERT - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SCHEDULE I have noted my concurrence for OELD on the proposed letter to SDG&E regarding the above matter.

Concurrence was, however, subject to the following observations:

1.

The cc list on the proposed letter is incomplete 'and inaccurate. What I consider as an updated and corrected version of the list is attached.

OELD concurrence is subject to use of the attached revised cc listing.

Several comments are in order regarding the enclohe to the letter (sumary of remaining Environmental Review Milestones).

A.

The July. 28, 1978 date shown as the beginning date for hearings on environmental and site suitability issues is approximately some 30 days after the pmposed issuance date for the FES.

However, July 28, 1978 is a Friday.

Thus, Monday, July 31, 1978, would be a more accurate and realistic date to use in this context.

B.

The date of December 1,1978 fo; issuance of a PID by the ASLB is, I believe, overly optimistic since it allows only approximately 60 days for all parties to (1) file proposed findings, etc. and (2) for the Board to consider and write the PID.

Since.

for example, the CERCDC has proposed some 50 contentions, I question whether this time period provided in your enclosure is sufficient.

L On the other hand, I have no basis at this time for giving you a different estimate. My' comments in 2A and B are, thus, merely set forth lest silence on my part be construed as acquiescence at this time. Accordingly, you need not change the dates in question on the enclosure in order to obtain OELD concurrence.

If you have any questions or comments, let me know.

Bernard M. Bordenick Attorney, OELD L

cc (w/o enclosure):

W. Regan W. Paton R. Hoefling M. Staenberg E. Licitra 8709250318 870922 PDR FOIA MCCREA87-554 PDR

\\

a__=______