ML20235D347

Forwards Rev 1 to Environ Rept,Consisting of Revised Chapter 1.Rev Reflects Changes in Scheduled Commercial Operating Dates & Updates Projected Loads W/Most Recent Load Forecast. W/O Rev 1

ML20235D347
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Phipps Bend
Issue date:	06/11/1976
From:	Gilleland J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:	Boyd R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20235B454	List: IA-87-554, Discusses Schedule for Radiological Safety Review of Application for CPs for Plant.Summary of More Important Radiological Safety Review Milestones Encl for Info & Review ML20235B453 ML20235B509 ML20235B533 ML20235B608 ML20235B635 ML20235B672 ML20235B695 ML20235B723 ML20235B812 ML20235C029 ML20235C216 ML20235C252 ML20235C285 ML20235C322 ML20235C415 ML20235C466 ML20235C518 ML20235C752 ML20235C764 ML20235C834 ML20235C914 ML20235C965 ML20235D117 ML20235D156 ML20235D235 ML20235D302 ML20235D347 ML20235D449 ML20235D467 ML20235D541 ML20235D604 ML20235D678 ML20235D681 ML20235D695 ML20235D709 ML20235D728
References
FOIA-87-554 6023, NUDOCS 8709250199
Download: ML20235D347 (4)

Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

830 Power Buildin6 jo >Tro+

u E

g egulat0fy DOCkB( %

TENNESSEE VAL. LEY AUTHORIT1 i

CH ATTANCiOG A. TENNESSEE 374ot

%'7 6

76 391 June 11, 1976 30,gfs kC/fg h

tdf497, e Dinctor of Nuclear Reactor Regulatica hang

[N N

Attention: Mr. Roger S. Boyd 8

Division of Project Management g

U.S. Nuclear Re6ulatory Comission p

l Washington, DC 20555

Dear Mr. Boyd:

In the Matter of the Application of )

Docket Nos. S N 50-5 m Tennessee Valley Authority

)

STN 50-554 Enclosed are bl copies of revision 1 to the Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Environmental Report which consists of a revised chapter 1.

This revision primarily reflects changes in the scheduled commercial operating dates and also updates the projected loads with our most recent load forecast, Sectica 1.1.1, " Load Characteristics," discusses the new load forecast which, in addition to TVA's basic forecasting methods, is based on new methods--particularly econometric nodels by additional staff expertise and additional information from surveys and publications. Also, this section has been erpanded l

to give more detail on forecasting methodology.

J As a result of our latest assessment, the long-term Browth out-look for the econog in the 1980's is now estimated to be somewhat lower than the outlook one year ago. Consequently, 1

the commercial and industrial loads were lowered, which results in a decrease in forecast of winter peaks in the mid-1980's.

1. 1(19s

/

l (gan#Sp p9 I g-s 6023 l

s I

l l

l l

An Equal Opportunity Employer 8709250199 B70922 I

PDR FOIA MCCREAB7-554 PDR

^ a Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation June 11, 1976 Section 1.3 has been modified to reflect the effect of the consequences of delay with revised unit schedules.

Very truly yours,

/

L H

. E. Gilleland Assistant Manager of Pc,ver Sworn to and subscribed before me this // day of h ed -1975 L

J b

6

((

9 I

e Notary Public

[I My cosmission expires /8-3-Ib l

d ir Enclosure l

CC: Mr. kegis Boyle (Enclosure)

Environmental Projects Branch 3 Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cosmaission Washington, DC 20555

+

e w

4 e)

Q g g R ry 'd's r U r h

~

)

jNI9I8103 DhkK[g l

l TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY PHIPPS BEND NUCLEAR PLANT UNITS 1 AND '2 DocxeT Nos, STN 50-553,50-55l1 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT EVISION 1 i

C REVISION 1 TO THE PHIPPS BEND NUCLEAR PLANT ~

UNITS 1 AND 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT Revision 1 to the Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Environmental Report consists of a revised chapter 1.

Remove the old chspter 1 and insert the ene2.osed new chapter 1 in its entirety.

This sheet should be fileil in front of Volume' 1 as a record of the changed chapter.

l 1

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _.