ML20128Q689

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:28, 7 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses Reissuance of Tech Specs.Licensee Agreed to Withdraw 831208 Request at 850619 Progress Review Meeting. Future Request for Reissuance of Tech Specs Will Be Exempt from License Fees
ML20128Q689
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 07/10/1985
From: Zwolinski J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Fiedler P
GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
References
LSO5-85-07-019, LSO5-85-7-19, NUDOCS 8507150061
Download: ML20128Q689 (3)


Text

, .

July 10, 1985 Docket No. 50-219 LS05-85-07-019 Mr. P. P. Fiedler Vice President and Director Oyster Creek fluclear Generating Station Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731

Dear Mr. Fiedler:

SUPJECT: REISSUANCE OF APPENDIX A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS)

Pe: Oyster Creek fluclear Generating Station In the past, the staff and GPU Nuclear (the licensee) have discussed the reissuance of the Oyster Creek Appendix A Technical Specification (TS) in its entirety. The staff stated in its letter' dated February 22,1983, that such a request from the licensee would be considered by the staff for the convenience of flRC and for clarification purposes and thus exempt from the Itcensee fee schedule. The licensee responded by letter dated December 8, 1983, submitting such a reouest for clarity and format purposes.

To date, the staff has not acted on this request from the licensee. The staff has issued 18 aren&ents to the Oyster Creek TS since December 1983 which are not included in the licensee's December 8, 1983, submittal. In the staff's Progress Peview meeting with the licensee on June 19, 1985, the licensee agreed to withdraw its December 8,1983, request.

This closes out the staff's action on this submittal; however, this letter does not change the intent of the staff's letter of February 22, 1983.

It is still our position that to reissue the Appendix A TS, either at your request or as an action initiated by the NRC, is for the convenience of NRC and for clarification of the TS. Thus, your request for the reissuance of the TS will be exempt from the license fee schedule pursuant to 10 CFR 170.11(b)(1).

Sincerely, 8507150061 850710 PDR ADOCK 05000219 Od3M 4 '

P PDR John A. Z k N Ki, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 5 Division of Licensing cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION

Docket File's DELD CJamerson NRC'PDR~ EJordan ACRS (10)

LPDR BGrimes RDiggs OPBf5 Reading JPartlow HThompson JDonohew i

I DL:0R8#5 DL: A0 DL:0RPf5 CJamerson J jIN:tm WOM 11er JZwolinski 07/A/85 /85 07/ /85 07/9/85 gl H-51 @

i

>* arzg#o,,

~ UNITED STATES

[ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION c  ; e wAswiwoTow. o. c. rosss

'+,.....# July 10, 1985 Docket No. 50-?19 LS05-85-07-019 Mr. P. B. Fiedler Vice President and Directnr Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731

Dear Mr. Fiedler:

SUBJECT:

REISSUANCE OF APPENDIX A TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS (TS)

Re: Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station

~

In the past, the staff and GPU Nuclear (the licenseel have discussed the reissuance of the Oyster Creek Appendix A rechnical Specification (TS) in its entirety, The staff stated in its letter dated February 22, 1983, that such a request from the licensee would be considered by the staff for the convenience of NRC and for clarification purposes and thus exempt from the licensee fee schedule. The licensee responded by letter dated December 8, 1983, submitting such a request for clarity and format purposes.

To date, the staff has not acted on this request from the licensee. The staff has issued 18 amendments to the Oyster Creek TS since December 1983 which are not included in the licensee's December 8,1983, submittal. In the staff's Progress Review meeting with the licensee on June 19, 1985, the licensee agreed to withdraw its December 8,1983, request.

This closes out the staff's action on this submittal; however, this letter does not change the intent of the staff's letter of February 22, 1983.

It is still our position that to reissue the Appendix A TS, either at your request or as an action initiated by the NRC, is for the convenience of NRC and for clarification of the TS. Thus, your request for the reissuance of the TS will be exernt from the license fee schedule pursuant to 10 CFR 170.11(b)(1).

Sinc ely, a

John . Zwolinski, Chief Opera ing Reactors Branch No. -5 Divis n of Licensing cc: See rext page

r 1 Mr. P. B. Fiedler Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Stetirn Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station cc G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Pesident Inspector Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge c/o U.S. NRC 1800 M Street, N.W. Post Office Box 445 Washington, D.C. ?0036 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 J.B. Liberman, Esquire Commissioner Bishop, Liberman, Cook, et al. New Jersey Department of Energy 1155 Avenue of the Americas 101 Commerce Street New York, New York 10036 Newark, New Jersey 0710?

Euoene Fisher, Assistant Director Regional Administrator Division of Environmental Quality Nuclear Regulatory Commission Department of Environmental Region 1 Office Protection 631 Park Avenue 380 Scotch Poad

. King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 Trenton, New Jersey 08628 PWP Licensing Manager GPU Nuclear 100 Interpace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Deputy Attorney General State of New Jersey Departnent of Law and Public Safety 36 West State Street - CN 112 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Mayor Lacey Township 818 West Lacey Road Forked River, New Jersey 08731 D. G. Holland Licensing Manager Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731

.