ML20236C653: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = TAC:64736
| stage = Other
}}
}}



Latest revision as of 09:07, 20 March 2021

Discusses Status of Review & Lists Addl Info Needed to Determine Whether Facility Liquid Effluent Sys Adequate to Support Plant Operations.Util Submittals Behind Schedule & If Unresolved,Issue May Impact Projected Plant Restart Date
ML20236C653
Person / Time
Site: Rancho Seco
Issue date: 10/26/1987
From: Knighton G
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Andognini G
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
References
TAC-64736, NUDOCS 8710270282
Download: ML20236C653 (2)


Text

_

  • A October 26, 1987 Docket No'.: 50-312 DISTRIBUTION AlTocketJi.le?

'NRC & L PDRs Mr. G. Carl Andognini PDf5 Plant File Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear JLee/GKalman Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station GWKnighton i 14440 Twin Cities Road '

Herald, California 95638-9799

Dear Mr. Andognini:

SUBJECT:

RESOLUTION OF.L'IQUID EFFLUENT CONCERNS (TAC N0. 64736)

This letter contains a status of our review and a list of additional informa-tion which is required before we can determine whether.the Rancho Seco liquid effluent system is adequate to support plant operations. The resolution'of our ccncerns relative to the Rancho Seco liquid effluent system is not pro-gressing in a. satisfactory manner. We wish to reemphasize our concerns in this area because your submittals have . fallen well behind-schedule and the- '

lack of resolution of this issue may impact your projected plant restart date.-

As discussed during the meeting at the Region.V offices on May 5, 1987, the following liquid effluent related actions were identified as prerequisites for j

plant restart:

SMUD would submit revised Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications (RETS).

SMUD would submit the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (0DCM).

l SMUD would submit the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP).  !

The above documents would be submitted in a condition acceptable to the NRC based on prior interface between the respective technical staffs. j SMUD would implement a liquid effluent control program based on the '

submitted documents prior to plant restart.

As of this date we have received the revised RETS (P.A. 155, Revision 1, dated October 3,1987). We have not received the ODCM or the REMP which you had committed to submit by July 1987. Cur tentative conclusion following review of the RETS submittal indicates that the proposed lower limits of detection for Os-134 and Cs-137 are unacceptably high and should be reduced by a factor of about five. However, we can not do a thorough review'of the RETS without reviewing the information contained in the 0DCM and REMP. Additionally, we-have requested the design basis (evaluation that the system is adequate.to supportplantoperations)andsystemdescriptionofthe.liquideffluentsystem to expedite our review.

87102702B2 871026 2 DR ADOCK 0500

e t

, 1 Mr. G. Carl Andognini -?- j z

.i (

i Based on your submittals to date und'the interface with'your technicaA staff, we are unable to conclude that the liquid effluent system and the proposed operating constraints (RETS) are adequate to support operations at Rancho  :

Seco. Our scope of review in this area is extensive and we have identified j that special effort will be required to complete this review in Jess than 90 \ t ,

days after receipt of.the information requested above. ;Ple.ese give this matter )

your prompt attention to decrease the likelihood of impact on~your' restart schedule.

(

Orig!nal @bd by: A George W. KniDhton -

I George W. Knighton, Director .i l

Project Directorate.,V '

Division of Reactor ProMets - III, IV, V and Special Profects <.- ,

l Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation j

.< .l s \

s'i , s..

i. ! , '

i

(

1

.i

' \. i

{ l I

v r* ,

o

's (\  !

\ f i

,1 e I

d s

%)

i T, r  ;

i i

4 l'

\

DRSP V DRS( )

GKMqf,/PDV^

,  ?

GKa) :cd @ltTn , e 7

10/d 10/g/87 </

?

t ,f l (

, y. \

\

'\

V

l*  !

% 5 l l 1

i Mr. G. Carl Andognini Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Chief Executive Of fiser, Nuclear Station Sacramento Municipal Utility District l

j CC; Mr. David S. Oplan, Secretary Mr. John Bartus and General Ccensel Ms. JoAnne Scott i Sacramento Municipal Utility Federal Energy Regulatory Commission j District 825 North Capitol Street, N. E. '

6201 S Street '

Washington, D.C. 20426 ,

P. O., Box 15330 Sacranento, G.lifornia 95813 Thortas A. Baxter, Esq.

3 I

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbricge 2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037 Mr. John V. Vinguist '

Acting Manager, Naciear Licensing )

Sacramento Munir;ipai IJtility District i Fancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station 14010 Twirl Cities Road Herald, California 95638-9799 l

Mr. Robert B. Borsum '

Babcodk & Wilcox Nuclear Power Generation Division Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue  !

Bethesda, Maryland 20814 j

Resident Inspector /Fancho'Seco  !

c/o U. S. N. R. C.

14440 lwin Citig. Rcad Fenld, California 95638 Regicnal AdminisVator, Region V U.S. hurlear Regulatory Cormiission p 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210  ;

Walnut. Creek, California 94596 j g

'1 Pr. Joseph 0. Ward, , Chief

' Radiological Healtb itranch, State ' Department of j 7M i Street, Of fice,EculthBuilding Services

  1. 8 j

i Sacramento, Califorrfia 95814  !

Sacramento County ddard of Supervisors '

( l 827 7th Street , Poc'm 424 4 ' - '

Sacramer.to, Cali fornia 95814 h.

f , Ms. Helen hubbard P. O. Box 63\ 't l , )

t).

l Sunol,Califfenia 94586 '

')/ t

, d'F ,

),

_ _ _ _ . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ t-_. . E' _ 1