IR 05000445/1975005

Insp Repts 50-445/75-05 & 50-446/75-05 on 750227-28. Deficiency Noted Re Procedure for Excavation for Reactor Containment Structures.Major Areas Inspected:Review of Qa/Qc Program Implementation for safety-related Structures

ML20245K047
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	03/06/1975
From:	Crossman W, Hubacek W, Stewart R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20245J949	List: IR 05000445/1975005 ML20245J946 ML20245J952 ML20245J960 ML20245J974 ML20245K073 ML20245K109 ML20245K113 ML20245K131 ML20245K141 ML20245K153 ML20245K166 ML20245K176 ML20245K182 ML20245K195 ML20245K201 ML20245K207 ML20245K212 ML20245K218 ML20245K224 ML20245K308 ML20245K323 ML20245K328 ML20245K355 ML20245K421 ML20245K445 ML20245K474 ML20245K477 ML20245K487 ML20245K508 ML20245K512 ML20245K525 ML20245K785 ML20245K803 ML20245K807 ML20245K814 ML20245K833 ML20245K842 ML20245K848 ML20245K855 ML20245K869 ML20245K873 ML20245K890 ML20245K897 ML20245K902 TXX-1264, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/75-05 & 50-446/75-05.Corrective Actions:Reactor Cavity Areas Containing Most Damage Removed as Part of Safeguards Bldg Excavation
References
FOIA-87-535 50-445-75-05, 50-445-75-5, 50-446-75-05, 50-446-75-5, NUDOCS 8905040313
Download: ML20245K047 (14)

Text

. - _ _ _ - _ _ -_ _________ __ _

!

.. O-e,

U. S. NUCLEAR R EGULATORY COMMISSION l

-

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REClON IV '

IE Inspection Report Nos. !O-445/75-05 Docket Nos. 50-445 .,',

50-446/75-05 50-446 ;.. . '

-

Applicant: Texas Utilities Generating C Category A2 *

2001 Bryan Tower ,. ,

Dalla s , Texas 75201 .

{~?

Facility: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station #,.[

Units 1 & 2 yg Location: Glen Rose, Texas

'

Type of Licensee: W. PWR,1161 MW(e)

Type of inspection: R ou tin e , Unannounc ed

..

Dates of Inspection: February 27-28, 1975  !!-

O

"

Dates of Previous Inspection: February 5,1975

.

Principal Inspe c tor: 8!4[7[

R. C. Stewart, Reactor Inipector Date

,..

Accompanying Inspector: W 3/6/7s W. G. Hubacek, Rea#.or Inspector Date i Other Accompanying Personnel: None t

Reviewed By: = 3[0[7f a, ,

W. A. Crossman, Senior Reactor Inspector Date  ;;

,

i

'

m

-

.

• e

' ~~

890504O'313 I 890425 PDR FOIA PDR DAUMAN87-535

. _ - _ _ - _ _-_ __ _ _ _ _ . . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ._ ._

. - __ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . __

i i

l

.

O p .\

. i ~'

.

SUMMARY Of FINDINGS 'k'

-

%

'N .

Enforcement Action J ' , ! Iterns of Noncompliance ", Violation , None tes,k

- . Infra c tion g ., .,,

('l'*' \

None F - ,

l

__

Deficiencies

'

N# . OA/OC Procedural Deficiency

-_

,

?q,\

t%

"

Contrary to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V,

.an inspection procerture was not developed and Dc, implemented for activities related to the M excavation for the reactor containtnent structures 5 of CPSES, Units 1 and 2, in accordance with Brown & Root Procedure CP-QCP 12. The procedure, M'

" Excavation and Soils Backfill, Compaction, $

Inspection and Testing", issued July 1,1974, revised November 1,1974, Section 3.1, states in part, "The Brown & Root, Inc. Proiect Quality ..

Assurance Manager is responsible for all test N activities covered by this procedure. For work W performed by Brown & Root, procedures shall be RI developed and implemented by Brown & Root which $'

cover inspection and testing requirements and $ '

provide documentation that requirements have been f

,;,

me t. " (DETAILS, paragraph 3) .

. . . .

'

lr This deficiency was identified by the inspecto %

?

9 \ Deviations 7, ,

None ,.

• m W

-

1 Licensee A.. tion on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters ,,,, j T

None outstanding ,

!

. '

(continue d)

._

-. ..  : , s. n _. - -

g.,.. .- .< -

-

i

____________ __ _____ _ ,

Ps

~*

A

.

-3

!!!. New Unresolved items N,*C

..:1

-

None r+ !

-

,

I Status of Previously Reoorted Unresolved items F i'

74-02/VII B Brown & Root (BLR) OA Procram Manual r;(

I Revisions to the BkR QA Program Manual have been completed and the , ' .. i

'

document has been approved by TUSI. This matter is resolve Desien Chances k'

V None  %

N'.

V Unusual Occurrences }

ry I'

None f,

-

V Other Significant Items

[

@

N None Vil Manacement Interview .

!

On February 28, at the conclusion of the inspection, a management I meeting was held with the following licensee representatives in E I attendance: [

s Y'

Texas Utilitie s Services. In c . (TUSI)  !

Mr. H. C. Schtnidt, QA Manager '

'

Mr. C. H. Gatchell, Resident Manager I

Brown & Root. Inc. (BL R) '

M C. Dodd, Project ManaBer M E. Bonin. Assistant Project Manager M L. Bussolini, Project QA Manager M Hansford, QA/QC Engineer Gibbs & Hill (GLH)

Mr. J. V. Hawhins, QA Engineer

'

The inspection findings, as contained in the summary and detail sectionr cf this report, were discusse I

'

'

(continued)  !

• '., .. . ..

.

.. ,.1 _,

- -

s-

swy. -- . .

i

- .- _ .. _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - -

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - . - - _ _ _

,

.1 L. _<

..iy i 1

.

~

'

R_EPORT DETAILS

. .

w L

'

Persons Contacted '

"

Texas Utilities Eervices. Inc. (TUSI) p'.

• ,

Mr. H. C. Schmidt, QA Manager Mr. C. H. Gatchell, Resident Manager 7,

'

Gibbs & Hill (GLH) . .

Mr. J. V. Hawkins, QA Engineer @'

Mr. J. J. Moorehead, Resident Engineer  ;.e

,-

Brown L Root. Inc. (B&R)

b Mr. H. C. Dodds, Project Manager  !

Mr. C. E. Bonin, Assistant Project Manager /

Mr. P. L. Bus solini, Project QA Manager ,;

Mr. D. L. Hansford QA/QC Engineer ,

Mr. J. L. Woodruff, Superintendent, Blasting P Mason.Johnston & Associates (MJA) >

.:

Mr. B. V. Dreyer, Chief of Engineering. Geology e 8'

Mr. W. T. Cromeans Resident Chief Technician '

Mr. A. D. Ca b1r., Assistant Resident Technician Mr. H. C. Crowder, Field Geologist .

Mr. K. G. Christopher, Assistant Geologist E-Reoort of Subjects inspected -

r F Scooe of Insoection ,

p The inspection was limited to the review of the site QA/QC program ,

implementation as it applies to work activities regarding safety i related structures during the initial construction phase. The inspectior. included the review of CA/QC records, procedures, and

. observation of the work in the areas of reactor building containment excavation, blasting, fill placement, preparations for concrete placement, and work activities relating to the safe shutdown -l impoundment dam (SSI Dam). , .: )

i

. Plant Progress The overall plant construction progress is reported as 1. 07. complet !

'

\

Significant progress was observed in the construction of the main i dam (Squaw Creek Dam), intake tunnels, and reactor building 9

. containment excavation ,

(continued)

• * , . . . - .

' " m.; . . - .. . =j .: r'. , . .

.

'

m v.~% .. . - ' *

,

_ _Z _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _

A i

J

._ -. - _ _ _ ..

A;

'

.

. 3

.

'

The Squaw Creek Dam core trench is essentially complete to bed rock and impervious and filter materials are being installe '

L

Work is continuing on the main concrete batch plant and construction [

' field office buildin W m Clearing operations for the SSI Dam have been completed; however, )

the core trench excavation has not commence ,

l Contamment Buildine Excavations - Units 1 and 2 f

- i

'

The inspector visited the site of the excavations for the containment N k buildings, Units 1 and 2. Evidence of rock "overbreak" around the FA 1 perimeters due to blasting was cbserved in both of the excavations E l but was more pronounced for Unit 1. This problem was reported by the licensee on February 4 in accordance with the requirements of

%e; 10 CFR 50. 55(e). ,

{

M Discussions with TUS1, BLR and MJA personnel of actions proposed *

to determine the extent of damage and corrective measures to be O taken indicated that a program to resolve the difficulty has been d developed and is being implemented. MJA will provide Feologic Iss data for use in engineering evaluations in determining the need for, [

extent of, and preferred type of remedial operation . l'

i

,

The inspector's examination of documentation relative to the excavations indicated an apparent lack of required quality control ,

E procedures applicable to excavating operations that have been com- 6 I p' e t e d. BLR procedure CB-QCP-12 " Excavation and Soils Backfill, Compaction, inspection and Testing" under Scope states: "This r 1 i

procedure covers all excavations to foundation rock and the selection, placement and compaction of structural fill soils and embankment .

!

materials required for permanent construction"; Section 3.1 states:

"The Brown & Root, Inc. Project Quality Assurance Manager is .'-

responsible for allinspection and test activities covered by this p'

procedure. For work performed by SkR, procedures shall be developed and implemented by BLR which cover all inspection and ;{

)

testing requirements and provide documentation to assure that A requirements have been met. "

t's ' P'

Gibbs & Hill Specifiestion No. 2323-55-6 " Excavation for Plant  ;

,

Strnetures" which ir applicable to the excavation of all materials { l encountered for construction of major structures on the plant y f site lists in Section 1.1 " Major Structures" the containment p, I

l

.

WB t

(continued)

!

-

.*f6r('h++,wun .. .s, , * - - * "

• - .

..,o.*... ]

l I l l

l

'

.

_ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _

p

.. _. _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ .

n A

,

-6

.

l

. , . \

structure under the heading of CateFory I Structures". This j

.

listing appears to include excavation work for Cagetory I Structures j[' ]

and that excavating operations be subject to the same level of quality [ ]

contro j j

• !

l

Criterion V of 10 CFR 50 states in part: " Activities affecting quality $

shall be prescribed in documented instructions, procedures or drawings of a type appropriate to the circumstances and shall be  ; ;

accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures and d rawing s ". O L

• ,

Contrary to the above requirements, B&R inspection procedures ;i relative to quality control activities for the excavations for the I:"

containments of CPSES, Units 1 and 2 did not exist. Based on the E inspector's finding s, this matter ha s been identified as a deficiency ,; :

in OC procedural development and implementation for a quality  ; [

related activit j 1 Review of OA/OC Procram for Initial Construction a h Implementation of OA Procram g/;

p The QA Manuals for TUSI. Brown & Root and Gibbs & Hill L were reviewed and observed to contain descriptions of .QA/QC personnel duties and responsibilities. The descriptions and {

r organization charts provide for freedom of CA/QC personne2 I .

from persons having cost and scheduling responsibilitie I )

Functional relationships were appropriately describe ..

< U At.dit s is

,, ,

The inspector observed that the TUSI, BLR and GLH QA Manuals I and procedures establish. requirements for audits of OC activities ,

by QA personnel and that documentation of audit activities is r equi r e d. Reports of audits are submitted to appropriate manag emen OC System Review b

,

Review of TUS1, BLR and G&H QA Manuals established that P

chey tontain the necessary requirements relative to procurement, material certifi;ation, and shipping, receipt and storag ,

-

.

.

W ,

.

(continue d)

e i

b

. l - < i v 7...,.. . . .

,,

_ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ___ _ _  !

- _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ . -_

i k

-

A ' A-  !

-

j

-

j

, 7 4 q

i SSI Dam Activities l

. l The SSI Dam site has been cleared in preparation for start of (

con s t ruc tion. During the inspector's review of the QA/QC e,

'

activiti,s associated with the SSI Dam the inspector was informed that preliminary soundness tests of the rock fill rnaterial, taken I

'~

i

'

from the previously selected borrow areas, did not meet the design specification. In discussing the problem with the MJA f ( l geotechnical staff, the inspector was informed that the SSI Dam t rock fill design was established utilizing the same material in .

[ I the initial test sections built to prove out the design. The inclusion y of the ASTM C. 88, " Test for soundness of aggregates by use of B sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate" in the specification occurred  ;

after the design had been establishe '

,

Rock currently being quarried contain clay stone fissures that can not withstand the magnesium sulfate test (ASTM C. 88). resulting in weighted percentage losses exceeding the specification (35%-95% l versus 20% 1imit) using particles passing 2-1/2 inch sieve and retained on a 1-1/2 inch siev k'

V The cognizant MJA Geologist indicated that the particular ASTM B standard may be unreasonably restrictive for the intended application; '

however, he expressed confidence in finding available sources of rock on site that will maet the specification. Surveys of other ,

borrow areas are now l aing investigated. The licensee represen- ,

tatives stated that the current delay in starting construction of *

the SSI Dam will not affect the overall completion ~ schedule of the '

plan s f*

e !

!

!

l l

>

\ l

'

l

-

q i

-

.

V F

.

'

.

• 1

,

i !

l .

1 e

%; m - ' .* *

- . , . . .. w. r . _ w , ..

L' .

.. . _ _ _ . _

l

___ _ __--_ - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.~. ,

t . .

~

.

-

.

.

.

' .

.

.

.

.

. f .. L.r_'1-

-

U. MATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSIN4

. < DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS

- REGION IV

'

... *

RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/75-01 Docket Nos. 50-44 5 50-446/75-01 50-446 Applicant: Texas Utilities Generating Company License No. None 1506 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Category A2 l Facility: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station - Units 1 & 2

~

Location: Glen Rose, Texas j s Type of Licensee: W, PWR,1161 MW(e) CASE EXHIBIT Type of Inspection: Routine, Announced Dates of inspection: January 8-9, 1975 Dates of Previous Inspection: December 6,1974 Principal Inspe cto r: . f E m /f // *

'.

~

R. C. Ste' wart, Reactor Inspector Date Accompanying inspector: None Other Accompanying Personnel: None .

-

s7 Reviewed By: //M m_- , /!/7[7s W. A. Crossman, Senior Reactor ' Date Inspe ctor j

.

b

.

.

l

- _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

o )

t-

.l

-

O A

..

*

.' . . ' ' ' ' , , " , ... ,.,'..*;*.,..

, .- , ,, , ,. -

,. . , * . ,

,

-

l

q

. 1

, & ,g, * Y

. .

SUMMARY OF TINDINGS

'

• '.' Enforcement Action m Violation

,e None I Infraction None

' ' ' ' Deficien cie s

'

.

. None I _ Licensee Action on Previous 1v Identified En.forcement Matters

'e. -

None outstanding II New Unresolved Items

. None I Status of Previous 1v Reported Unre' solved Items

.*.

. :a _ , .

-

I 74-02/VII B Brown & Root (BLR) OA Program Manual f

'

The BLR " Quality Assurance / Control Manual for Nuclear Projeets, Construction Phase, Volume II", contains the BLR QA Program Policy and Commitments. The manual does not contain references to other BkR Ouality Assurance /

Control Manuals in use, nor, is it clear as to the manuals

' ' ' '*

, , .}

fr.nettonal application to the Comanche Peak Project. These

~2-matters remain unresolved. (DETAILS, paragraph 2) Design Changes

.

None

.

, {)

, V Unusual Occurrences

None .

\

(continued)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ .

___ __- _ - __ _ _ _ _ _

R e

,

- - *

-

, ,.. . . . . . . .;+ ,,..,,;',

. . .

. . .

. .. .

--

.._

.. .

,

.,

V -3- V

_

f

,

'VII. 'Other Significant Items

.

.' Proicet Status

--

Site clearing / preparation and excavation is reported as 507. complet . Excavation of the core trench for the main lake dam has commence "

The start of construction of the Safe Shutdown Impoundment Dam (SSI) has been delayed until February 1. This delay will not affect the overall plant schedule. There are no safety related work activities currently in progres .

The reported on-site work force is 355 personne *

,

VIII. Manacement Interview On January 9, at the conclusion cf the inspection, a management meeting  ;

was held to discuss the results of the inspection. The following licensee  ;

representatives were in attendance:

TUSI Mr. R. G. Tolson, QA Engineer

. Mr. P. M. Milam, QA Engineer  ;

Mr. C. H. Gatchell, Resident Manager l

.

. ' ' ' ,

BLR

, Mr. L. A. Ashley, Construction Manager i M Dodd, Project Manager

' ,

M E. Bonin, Assistant Project Manager l M Whitford, QA Manager  !

M Bussolini, Project QA Manager

_'

.

Mr. D. L. Hansford, QA/QC Engineer M r. C. H. Ivey, Project Engineer ,

!

.lE)

....

-

,' The inspection findings, as contained in the Summary and Report Details l Sections of this report, were discusse ;

.

.

. ;.

...-

.

.

i

(Continue d)

i

!

. - _ _

l

>

- p

R

, ,. . .

'

.

-

' '. .. ~ .

n'- ....~

. .,

, ,

. . . . ,

,. .

.; -

.- ..

y -4 y; *

.

REPORT DETAILS

.

,

-

.

. G. i List' of Persons Contacted

"

. Texas Utilities Services. Inc. (TUS1)

Mr. -R. W. Caudie, Project Manager - Nuclear Plants

.,j M Hickman, CPSES Project Engineer

<

a M Schmidt, QA Manager-

- M Tolson, QA Engineer

'

M Milam,- QA Engineer Mr. ' C. H. Gatchell, Resident Manager

.

Brown & Root, In (BLR) ,

.

Mr. L. A. Ashley, Construction Manager

Mr. H. C. Dodd, Project Manager Mr. C. L. Whitford, QA Manager Mr. C. E. Bonin, Assistant Project Manager

- Mr. P. L. Bussolini, Project QA Manager

'

Mr. C. H. Ivey, Project Engineer -

Mr. D. L. Hansford, QA/QC Engineer Freese & Nichols (FLN)

,

Mr. J. M. Dodson, Resident QA Manager Mr. W. L. McGrath, QA Engineer M ,

-

,

Mason-Johnston L Associates, Inc. (M-J)

Mr. W. T. Cromeans, Resident Chief Technician

, - }-

Mr. A. D. Cabla, Assistant Resident Chief Technician

, Mr. H. C. Crowder, Geologist

. Report of Subjects Insoected i

7 Scone of Inseeetion j

.@

'.% The inspection was limited to the review of the site QA program imple-mentation as it applies to safety related work activities in the initial Construction Phase. In addition, a review and examination was con-ducted of the activities associated with the construction d the SSI Da .

. BLR QA Program Manual Review  !

U During the previous inspection 1_/ the BkR QA Manual, " Quality Assurance /

.

Control Manual for Nuclear Projects, Construction Phase, Volume II" was still in final review and had not been issued for us .

(continue d)

1/ RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/74-05 & 50-446/74-05, dated 12/16/74,Section IV, item 74-02/VII _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

- ~ ~ ~ - - * ~ ~ ~ ~ . --n._, .

'

A

. : .. '.,..w a .

.,

- '

. , . . . . r . ~ * , f. , ,.~. . . . .

.., , . . , . ,.. , .

, .

.-

-

. .

'

%' . %/

. . l t During this inspection, it was established that the manual was approved and issued to TUSI December 30. However, TUSI representatives have

".

' *

indicated that a final review and acceptance by TUSI has not been

- completed at this tim Daring the inspector's review of the Construction Phase II Manua * the following matters were identified and discussed with the BLR repre-sentatives as items that appear to require further clarification: The Manual, Section 1. 0 "QA Program", references individual project PSAR's for specific details regarding QA program

. , , ,

requirements. The functional application of the manual and commitments applicable to the Comanche Peak Project are not clea ,

, The manual does not appear to contain references to other BLR Corporate QA Manuals which appear to be in use at the site,

.

specifically: the QA/ Control Manual, Engineering, Volume 1; the QA/ Control Manual, Procurement, Volume III; and the manual entitled, " Administrative Procedures". In view of items a and b above, ~ the BLR "QA Program" for

- Comanche Peak, Units 1 and 2, require clarificatio w . . . . . . , The pages in the manual are not numbere .

f n

, The manual contains sections entitled Electrical, Civil, non-

' conformance, etc. There appears to be no reference to these

'

sections, nor is it clear as to their application to the Comarche

{

Peak Projec l In discussing the above items with the BLR QA Manager, the QA I -

._3 Manager stated that he would review the items and corrective measures

%'

.

would be initiated. The inspector stated that the items would remain

!

unresolved pending a subsequent RO review during the next inspectio ] ,

The inspector had no further questions relative to his review of the remaining portions of the manual, Section 1, " Quality Assurance

. Prog ram".

,} BLR QA Site Activities (C. P. Authorization)

• The SLR QA Project Manager and one staff member are presently assigned full time to the site. During discussions held with the BLR QA

,

staff, the inspector reviewed the BLR QA/QC activities relative to

'

(continue d)

l L____-____--_____ _ . _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

l

l

.

I O ^

. ,. . .... ,

'- .. *,. . ..:' -

. ,, .' ,, ..,

_

"

- .

.

,

v -6- v a

l

' site preparation applicable to the commencement of construction of j safety related structures. The QA/QC staff members appear to be

,

. ' . .* - knowledfeable of the QA functions to be implemented during the initial phases of construction. The inspector verified that approved l .

QC procedures are maintained on-site relative to the construction l activities associated with excavattori,; fill placement, blasting and I

ground water control. ' BLR QA/QC personnelindependence and l

'

'

personnel duties and responsibilities 6 appear to be in accord with the licensees QA program requirement The TUS10A/QC site office has been established on-site; however, full time resident inspection activities have not been established. The

'*- TUS! QA staff members currently conduct weekly surveillance / audits i of the contractors site activities. The areas of review and the timeliness of their activities appear to be consistent with the work

-

in progres .

The start of blasting and excavation for the reactor containment structure is currently scheduled for late Februar e Construction Activities - SSI Dam The start of excavation and construction of the SSI Dam has been -

delayed. The BLR representatives indicated that construction of the

.

" SSI Dam is now scheduled to start the first week in February :md that

-

the delay would not affect the overall schedul .

s

' FLN Activities

',

.

A follow-up review of the FLN QA/QC program implementation for the SSI Dam construction was conducted by the inspecto .

Discussions were held with the site personnel and a review of the FLN Procedures, Appendix J,. " Inspection and Testing",

'.

f". was conducted. .The FLN QA/QC staff demonstrated an under-P, standing of the FLN QA Program and Procedural Requirement There were no matters that remain outstandin .

! M-J

'

Discussions were held with the M-J staff members relative to

'

the status of their procedural development and final preparation

.. s for site testing activities. The M-J representatives stated that

.

' all QC Program Procedureg have been developed, however, approximately 26 procedures are stillin various forms of final review, approval, and issuance. The procedures required for (continued)

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ _ . -- . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _

_ ___ _ _ _ _ ,

.

.

• . .. . O, ..

...

. . .. .. . .

,,

.__ _ _ _ .

.

._ , ' *

V 7 V

. ..

&

w i the anticipated site testing activity in February are in final

"

forrn and available for us ....

.. 7

-1 M-J has 12 personnel on-site. The site testing laboratory

~

facility appears to be operational and in phase with the current cons truction activitie . 1 i

- .

,

!

l

. !

i I

. . .

.

• • g e*.

M

.) *

.

• -

l l

.

.

'

s .s

.+-

.

..q 4

'

,.

_...

,

.

t i

-  !

'

\

U

• A ,

1 i