IR 05000445/1975002

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Regulatory Operations Insp Repts 50-445/75-02 & 50-446/75-02 on 750117.No Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup Review Re Previously Identified Unresolved Item 74-02/VII B, Brown & Root QA Program Manual
ML20212N894
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 01/21/1975
From: Crossman W, Stewart R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20212N850 List:
References
FOIA-87-119 50-445-75-02, 50-445-75-2, 50-446-75-02, 50-446-75-2, NUDOCS 8703130196
Download: ML20212N894 (7)


Text

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

f

% '

D f U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

REGION IV

RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/75-02 Docket Nos. 50-445

.l 50-446/75-02 50-446 l

! Applicant: Texas Utilities Generating Company License No. None 1506 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Category A2

.

Facility: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station - Units 1 & 2

.

~

,

(

'

Location: Glen Rose, Texas

,

Type of Licensee: W, PWR,1161 MW(e)

Type of Inspection: Routine, Announced (Meeting)

.4

'

.,

Dates of Inspection: January 17, 1975 Dates of Previous Inspection: January 8-9, 1974 3p ,

W4

.

Principal Inspector: - / / 7[

R. C. Stewart, Reactor I#spector

'

.q

-

Date v

.

~"

Accompanying Inspector: None ,

! Other Accompanying Personnel: None Reviewed By: -

M I

?. W. A. Crossman, Senior Reactor Inspector Date

,

2$

T.Q*l

,.-vy

@tj

? Po LA}-Wl--llj

.

8703130196 870220 PDR FOIA l WILLIAM 87-119 PDR

. --_

J 6# > me e 64 ' M

'

. b ' '

,

d-

,

  • .

.

. . .

.. - 2-

.

"

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

~ Enforcement Action 3 Violation c ;

None I Infraction

.

None

]*

, Deficiencies None

.

I Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters i

. None outstanding

.

II New Unresolved Items

-

None

. 'I I Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items

. ;}

74-02/VII B Brown & Root (B &R) QA Program Manual

._ l The B&R " Quality Assurance / Control Manual for Nuclear i Projects, Cordtruction Phase, Volume II", contains the B&R QA Program Policy and Commitments. The manual does not contain references to other B&R Quality Assurance /

Control Manuals in use, nor is it clear as to the manuals functional application to the Comanche Peak Project. These

,

matters remain unresolved. (DETAILS, paragraph 2)

. Design Changes

'

ll ';

None C

, ?? V Unusual Occurrences

j None

.

-

(continued)

.

I

_ _ . . . . . - - . . . - - - - - -- --

_ . . . . . .

, ,

.

- - - - - , - - ,--,-,m-www+y--,- - - - -g-- -------y---- -- - , - - ,---,----v-- '

,._ -. . - - - . - . . -

. - .

. . . - . . -.

.

.. .) T ,

-

-

.g ,

. -

-4 t< ;} REPORT DETAILS

'

!

'

,. Persons Contacted

-

.t .

~

sp The following individuals were in attendance during the meeting:

'

M?; , Texas Utilities Services, Inc. (TUSI) Mr. H. C. Schmidt, QA Manager

.

M G. Tolson, QA Engineer M.. . . M M. Milam, QA Engineer

{ -h j M H. Boren, QA Engineer

>' M Vega, QA Engineer

v Brown & Root, Inc. (B&R)

'

Mr. C. L. Whitford, QA Manager j Mr. P. L. Bussolini, Project QA Manager

.i Mr. R. A. Romeo, QA Supervisor

.

7 Report of Subjects Inspected

-

, e

~"i ~ Scope of Inspection

..

,

The inspection was limited to a follow-up review regarding the previously j [. identified unresolved item, 74-02/VII B, " Brown & Root QA 1)rogram l ~;-

_; Manual".

-

i

, B&R QA Program Manual (74-02/VII B)

{ ..!

l l On January 17, a meeting was held at the TUSI corporate offices to

f discuss matters regarding the RO inspector's concern in that the <

recently revised B&R QA Manual, " Quality Assurance / Control Manual for Nuclear Projects, Construction Phase, Volume II" does not clearly

. identify the functional application of the manual and commitments j , applicable to the Comanche Peak Project. This matter was identified

'

l as an unresolved item 1/ during the previous inspection.

.

.'

!

The licensee initiated the meeting in order that the matter be further

,.

l t

reviewed and discussed with the cognizant B&R and TUSI personnel.

I

The licensee provided the attendees with an agenda outline; however, , the inspector's participation in the meeting was limited to the following j topics: '

t =

-

l

'

(continued)

!

1/ RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/75-01 and 50-446/75-01, dated 1/16/75,  ;

'

Report Details, paragraph 2.

i i

! .

J .

, , , _ _ , _ _ . _ . . _ - _ . . . _ - - . --

) -..; e '

<

v: .

. .

. - . - - . . - - . - - ,__.. --_ - - - . _ _ ._.., - -

,

-

.9 , .'

-

. o

- '"

.. -

.

'

VI Other Significant Items Not applicabl . .

VII Management Interview

,

- ,%:.

.1,. Not appilcable

.I

-

.

. .

b

.

i +

.

i g n,q

.....

  • Ls 't

'rL * .

's 4

, ** ,

_ o

's I

.

1 e

, #

4

.

i

'&*4* -a* ...%o _

,

r .

, . ~, .

-

!' .

O*

A '

t' L

-

INSPECTION PLAN ( ,, we RO Inspection Report N M /75-02 Licensee: Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCO)

Location: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES) - Units 1 & 2 Facility: Glen Rose, Texas

-

Type of Licensee: W, PWR,1161 MWe Type of Inspection: Specialc, Announced

'

Dates of Inspection: Janua ry 17, 1975 ,

Dates of Previous Inspection: January 8-9, 1975 SCOPE OF INSPECTION I Review contractor's QA Program as a result of unresolved matters identified in RO Report Nos. 50-445 and 50-446/75-0 . Document Review (Individual in-office inspection effort)

Review PSAR Sections:

,

17.1. 3. 0

17.1. l 17.1. 3. 2  :

'

17.1. 3. 3 17.1. V Review B&R QA Manual, Phase Volume II, Section 1. 0 "QA Program"

,[i as compared to above related PSAR requirement i I[ , (continued)

Approve / Disapprove:

.-

j R. C. Stewart Reactor Inspect 8r

///7[7.s~

Date 4. O (',,. y, . . //////

Date f

,

! * Review contractor's QA Program Manual relative to recent revision I

!

. . . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ __

8 g

L ,

--

,

--

. 1, -

,

,

-

$., p ,

.

'

.

Texas Utilities Generating Company -2-50-382/75-02 3', Individual On-Site Inspection Effort j Review construction progres !

, Examine QA/QC on-site procedures for correction and consistency

of in-office Document Revie , Examine construction QA/QC procedures for finalization commensurate with progress of constructio I t

n

.-:.

I

,

<

.6

i

,. i-u

.

  • .t n

.

__

-. . - . . . - - . - - - .

+

4 as ; y # 'p e

.,

-

-S- Statement of the purpose of the meetin i b.- Discussions of TUSI's background involvement with B&R QA 1 . Program and statu ,_ i Clarifications as required by B& _

' N:

-

.' Discussion of AEC concerns over program statu .

The significant subjects of the discussions centered on the B&R QA

'

..-

'

s Program as described and contained in the Comanche Peak PSAR, Section 17.1. 3, and various B&R QA/QC Manuals. During the dis-cussions, the inspector emphasized, by demonstrative presentation of Section 17.1. 3 of the PSAR and B&R Documents, that the B&R QA Program appears to encompass B&R corporate manuals that may, or may not, be applicable to the Comanche Peak Project and as a result the B&R "QA Program" for the Comanche Peak Project requires definitive boundaries, including reference, or identity, of all applicable

' (' ' documents. At the conclusion of these discussions, the TUSI repre-

.

sentative informed the inspector that further discussions will be r"! ' conducted by TUS1 representatives with the B&R representatives to resolve the matter. This item remains unresolved pending a RO review during the next inspectio l

...t q

.

h

!

.

e

>

4

, , o-we-a* *

. -. ; ' c- ,

, .

. .