IR 05000445/1975002
| ML20212N894 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 01/21/1975 |
| From: | Crossman W, Stewart R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212N850 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-87-119 50-445-75-02, 50-445-75-2, 50-446-75-02, 50-446-75-2, NUDOCS 8703130196 | |
| Download: ML20212N894 (7) | |
Text
_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
%
'
D f
- f U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT
REGION IV
RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/75-02 Docket Nos. 50-445
.l 50-446/75-02 50-446 l
!
Applicant:
Texas Utilities Generating Company License No. None 1506 Commerce Street Dallas, Texas 75201 Category A2
.
Facility: Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station - Units 1 & 2
.
(
~
,
'
Location: Glen Rose, Texas Type of Licensee:
,
Type of Inspection: Routine, Announced (Meeting)
.4'
.,
Dates of Inspection: January 17, 1975 Dates of Previous Inspection: January 8-9, 1974 3p
,
W4
/
/ 7[
.
Principal Inspector:
-
-
R. C. Stewart, Reactor I#spector Date
'
.q v
.
~"
Accompanying Inspector: None
,
!
Other Accompanying Personnel: None Reviewed By:
-
M I
?.
W. A. Crossman, Senior Reactor Inspector Date
,
2$
T.Q*l
,.-vy
@tj
?
Po LA}-Wl--llj
.
WILLIAM 87-119 PDR
.
--_
J 6# > me e
64 ' M
'
b
' '
d-
.
,
,
.
.
.
.
.
2-
..
-
.
"
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
~
I.
Enforcement Action A.
Violation
c
None I
B.
Infraction
.
None
]
C.
Deficiencies
,
None
.
II.
Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters i
None outstanding
.
.
III.
New Unresolved Items None
-
. 'I
. ;}
Status of Previously Reported Unresolved Items IV.
74-02/VII B Brown & Root (B &R) QA Program Manual
._ l The B&R " Quality Assurance / Control Manual for Nuclear i
Projects, Cordtruction Phase, Volume II", contains the B&R QA Program Policy and Commitments. The manual does not contain references to other B&R Quality Assurance /
Control Manuals in use, nor is it clear as to the manuals functional application to the Comanche Peak Project. These matters remain unresolved. (DETAILS, paragraph 2)
,
V.
Design Changes
.
ll ';
'
None C
??
VI.
Unusual Occurrences
,
j None
.
-
(continued)
.
I
--
--
_ _..... - -... - - - - -
_.....
.
,
,
.
- - - -
-, - -
as-
,--,-,m-www+y--,- - - -
-g--
y----
-- -, - -
,---,----v--
-w-T r-
=- -
---'~>r--Ar*--T
'
.
,. _
-.
.
-.
.
. -
. - - -. -.. -
.
.
-.
.
.) T
-
..
,
-
.g-4 t<
-
.
,
i.
- }
REPORT DETAILS
'
!
'
Persons Contacted
,.
.t
.
-
~
The following individuals were in attendance during the meeting:
sp M
Texas Utilities Services, Inc. (TUSI)
'
,
?;
Mr. H. C. Schmidt, QA Manager u.
.
Mr. R. G. Tolson, QA Engineer M....
Mr. P. M. Milam, QA Engineer
{
-h j Mr. A. H. Boren, QA Engineer
>'
v Brown & Root, Inc. (B&R)
'
Mr. C. L. Whitford, QA Manager j
Mr. P. L. Bussolini, Project QA Manager
.i Mr. R. A. Romeo, QA Supervisor
.
Report of Subjects Inspected e
-
,
~"i
~1.
Scope of Inspection
..
The inspection was limited to a follow-up review regarding the previously
,
j
[.
identified unresolved item, 74-02/VII B, " Brown & Root QA 1)rogram l
~;-
Manual".
_;
- i
-
,
2.
B&R QA Program Manual (74-02/VII B)
{
..!
l l
On January 17, a meeting was held at the TUSI corporate offices to
f discuss matters regarding the RO inspector's concern in that the
<
recently revised B&R QA Manual, " Quality Assurance / Control Manual for Nuclear Projects, Construction Phase, Volume II" does not clearly
- .
identify the functional application of the manual and commitments j
'
as an unresolved item 1/ during the previous inspection.
applicable to the Comanche Peak Project. This matter was identified
,
l
.
. '
The licensee initiated the meeting in order that the matter be further
!
l reviewed and discussed with the cognizant B&R and TUSI personnel.
,.
t I
The licensee provided the attendees with an agenda outline; however,
,
j.
the inspector's participation in the meeting was limited to the following j
topics:
'
t
=
l (continued)
-
!
1/ RO Inspection Report Nos. 50-445/75-01 and 50-446/75-01, dated 1/16/75,
'
'
Report Details, paragraph 2.
i i
!
.
J
.
)
_
_. _.. _ - _... _
- -.
--
,,, _ _,
-..;
e s.
v:
.
'
<
.
.
. -. - -.. - -. - -
,__.. --_ - -
-.
._.., - -
,
-
.9
.'
,
.
-
o
'"
-
..
-
.
'
VII.
- Other Significant Items Not applicable.
..
VIII.
Management Interview
,
,%:..1,.
Not appilcable
-
. I
-
.
..
b
.
i i.
+
i g n,q
......
- Ls 't
'rL *.
's
, **,
_
M.
o
's I
.
1 e
,
4
.
i
'&*4*
-a*
...%o
_
,
r
.
e
~,
.
.
,
!'
O A
t' L
-
.
INSPECTION PLAN
'
-
(
we
,,
RO Inspection Report No.
50-3M /75-02 Licensee: Texas Utilities Generating Company (TUGCO)
Location:
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES) - Units 1 & 2 Facility:
Glen Rose, Texas
-
Type of Licensee:
W, PWR,1161 MWe Type of Inspection: Specialc, Announced
'
Dates of Inspection:
Janua ry 17, 1975
,
Dates of Previous Inspection:
January 8-9, 1975 SCOPE OF INSPECTION I
1.
Review contractor's QA Program as a result of unresolved matters identified in RO Report Nos. 50-445 and 50-446/75-01.
2.
Document Review (Individual in-office inspection effort)
Review PSAR Sections:
17.1. 3. 0
,
17.1.3.1 l
17.1. 3. 2
'
17.1. 3. 3 17.1.3.4 V
Review B&R QA Manual, Phase Volume II, Section 1. 0 "QA Program"
,[
as compared to above related PSAR requirements.
i i
I[
(continued)
,
Approve / Disapprove:
.-
R. C. Stewart
///7[7.s~
4. O (',,. y,..
////// f j
Reactor Inspect 8r Date Date
,
!
- Review contractor's QA Program Manual relative to recent revisions.
I
-
!
... _ _ _
_.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_..
_
__
g
L
--
,
,
$.,
p 1,
-
-
.
,
--
,
,
.
'
.
Texas Utilities Generating Company-2-50-382/75-02 3',
Individual On-Site Inspection Effort a.
Review construction progress.
j
!
b.
Examine QA/QC on-site procedures for correction and consistency
,
of in-office Document Review.
- c.
Examine construction QA/QC procedures for finalization
,
commensurate with progress of construction.
I t
n
.-:
.
I
,
<
.6
i
,. i
- u
.
- .t n
.
__
-.
. -.
.. - -. - - -.
+
as ; y # 'p e
-S-
-
.,
Statement of the purpose of the meeting.
a.
i b.-
Discussions of TUSI's background involvement with B&R QA
,_ i
.
Program and status.
-
Clarifications as required by B&R.
_
-
c.
' N:
-
.'
d.
Discussion of AEC concerns over program status.
.
The significant subjects of the discussions centered on the B&R QA
'
..-
Program as described and contained in the Comanche Peak PSAR, s
'
Section 17.1. 3, and various B&R QA/QC Manuals. During the dis-cussions, the inspector emphasized, by demonstrative presentation of Section 17.1. 3 of the PSAR and B&R Documents, that the B&R QA Program appears to encompass B&R corporate manuals that may, or may not, be applicable to the Comanche Peak Project and as a result the B&R "QA Program" for the Comanche Peak Project requires definitive boundaries, including reference, or identity, of all applicable
' (' '
documents. At the conclusion of these discussions, the TUSI repre-sentative informed the inspector that further discussions will be
.
r"!
conducted by TUS1 representatives with the B&R representatives to
'
resolve the matter. This item remains unresolved pending a RO review during the next inspection.
lq
...t
.
h
!
.
e
>
4
,,
o-we-a*
' c-
,.
.
-.
,
.
.