ML20245K141

Recommends Closing Inquiry 86-54 as Result of Review of Info Contained in File Specifically,Encl 860715 Memo

ML20245K141
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas, 05000000
Issue date:	01/28/1987
From:	Mark Resner NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA)
To:	Connelly S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTOR & AUDITOR (OIA)
Shared Package
ML20245J949	List: IR 05000445/1975005 ML20245J946 ML20245J952 ML20245J960 ML20245J974 ML20245K073 ML20245K109 ML20245K113 ML20245K131 ML20245K141 ML20245K153 ML20245K166 ML20245K176 ML20245K182 ML20245K195 ML20245K201 ML20245K207 ML20245K212 ML20245K218 ML20245K224 ML20245K308 ML20245K323 ML20245K328 ML20245K355 ML20245K421 ML20245K445 ML20245K474 ML20245K477 ML20245K487 ML20245K508 ML20245K512 ML20245K525 ML20245K785 ML20245K803 ML20245K807 ML20245K814 ML20245K833 ML20245K842 ML20245K848 ML20245K855 ML20245K869 ML20245K873 ML20245K890 ML20245K897 ML20245K902 TXX-1264, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/75-05 & 50-446/75-05.Corrective Actions:Reactor Cavity Areas Containing Most Damage Removed as Part of Safeguards Bldg Excavation
References
FOIA-87-535 NUDOCS 8905040338
Download: ML20245K141 (1)

Text

_ _ _ - _ _

l

+

pm 8tco

'k UNITED STATES

{

+.!'.

.g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

, iJ

,5

.j WASHING TON, D. C. 20555

)

\\.... /

January 28, 1981 MEMORANDUM FOR: Sharon R. Connelly, Director Office of Inspector and Auditor FROM:

Mark E. Resner, Assistant d,

to the Director

' ~ ~ ~ "

SUBJECT:

INQ 86-54 A review of the information contained in the subject file, specifically, the July 15, 1986, memorandum with attachment to you from Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator, Region IV, was made. Based on my review of that information, it appears as though the references therein to the performance of certain NRC personnel are founded in opinion rather than specifics supported by facts. The opinions expressed primarily focus on the quality of employee performance and are oriented to resolution by management action as opposed to an issue of wrongdoing within OTA's norviFw.

~~~

As part of my review of this case file, contact was made with Martin on January 27, 1987. In response to questions posed to Martin, he advised that because of the large volume of documents from the law suit (Houston Lighting and Power (HL&P) vs. Brown and Root) to be reviewed, Region IV human resource expenditure necessitated that the region enlist sources external to the NRC to perform the review. In that regard, Martin believes a verbal request was made to HL&P and a written commitment from them was received in response. Addi-tionally, HL&P employed an independent law firm and technical consultant to conduct the review. According to Martin, Region IV monitored the review by conducting "several" inspections which involved random sampling of HL&P's review. In order to complete our case file, Martin is forwarding copies of these inspection. reports and a copy of the written commitment from bl&P to undertake the review.

In consideration of the foregoing information, and panding_QlA's_ satisfactory review of the information Martin is forwarding I recommend closing this case.

If you concur with this recommendation, I believe a follow-up telephone call to Martin should be made so that he may proceed with any management action, if any.

cc:

G. Mulley c /6 8905040338 890425 PDR FOIA BAUMAN87-535 PDR j

___.__,._._m__mm_

_ma,_m____,__m____

________________m.,m_____,_.___2__

____,___,________.________m_.___

, _ _