ML072490046: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML072490046
| number = ML072490046
| issue date = 09/18/2007
| issue date = 09/18/2007
| title = 08/28/2007 and 09/05/2007 Summary of Telephone Conference Calls Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Concerning D-RAI
| title = and 09/05/2007 Summary of Telephone Conference Calls Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Concerning D-RAI
| author name = Gettys E
| author name = Gettys E
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 18, 2007LICENSEE:PPL Susquehanna, LLCFACILITY:Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2
{{#Wiki_filter:September 18, 2007 LICENSEE: PPL Susquehanna, LLC FACILITY:     Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLS HELD ON AUGUST 28,2007 AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONThe U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held telephone conference calls on August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staff's draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference calls were useful in clarifying the intent of the staff's D-RAIs.Enclosure 1 provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of theD-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary./RA/Evelyn Gettys, Project Manager License Renewal Branch A Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLS HELD ON AUGUST 28, 2007 AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held telephone conference calls on August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference calls were useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.
The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.
                                              /RA/
Evelyn Gettys, Project Manager License Renewal Branch A Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388


==Enclosures:==
==Enclosures:==
: 1. List of Participants
: 1. List of Participants
: 2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Informationcc w/encls: See next page  
: 2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Information cc w/encls: See next page
: ML072490046OFFICEPM:RLRA:DLRLA:DLRBC:RLRA:DLRNAMEEGettysIKingDWrona for LLundDATE09/07/0709/07/0709/18/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLSUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONLIST OF PARTICIPANTSAugust 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007PARTICIPANTSAFFILIATIONSEvelyn GettysU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Allen HiserNRC Andrew JohnsonNRC Duane FilchnerPPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL)
 
Jeff WeikPPL Mike DetamorePPL Mike MayPPL  DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONSUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONAugust 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC, held telephone conference calls on August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA). D-RAI 4.7.1-1In Section 4.7.1 of the SSES LRA, the licensee references Section 5.4.4.4 of the Final SafetyAnalysis Report (FSAR), Rev. 60, and then states that the main steam flow restrictors areresistant to erosion by comparing turbine inspection results made at the Dresden Unit 1 facilitythat revealed no noticeable effects from erosion on the stainless steel nozzle partitions.
ML072490046 OFFICE      PM:RLRA:DLR        LA:DLR                BC:RLRA:DLR NAME        EGettys            IKing                  DWrona for LLund DATE        09/07/07            09/07/07              09/18/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007 PARTICIPANTS                              AFFILIATIONS Evelyn Gettys                            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
a.Discuss any actual erosion rates that have been measured on mainsteam line flow restrictors at SSES or other nuclear plants. If there areno actual measured erosion rates available, discuss the basis forconcluding that the main steam flow restrictors are resistant to erosion,and include in the discussion a detailed comparison of turbine nozzlepartition and main steam flow restrictor materials. The materialscomparison should include such salient points as material specificationsused, chemistry limits of those specifications, and process controls formaterial fabricated in the late 1950s (Dresden) vs. the early 1980s(Susquehanna).
Allen Hiser                              NRC Andrew Johnson                            NRC Duane Filchner                            PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL)
b.Section 5.4.4.3 of the FSAR, Rev. 60, states that surface finish has aminor effect on erosion-corrosion, and that very rough surfaces will erodemore rapidly than smooth surfaces. Has the licensee verified that theexposed surfaces of the main steam line flow restrictors are sufficientlysmooth to not undergo accelerated erosion?Discussion: The applicant's discussion of the historical precedence set by the FSAR, helpedto clarify an issue for the staff. Therefore, the staff decided to withdraw the question, and it willnot be sent as a formal RAI. D-RAI 4.7.1-2With an assumed erosion rate of 0.004 in. per year, the applicant stated that 40 years ofoperation would only increase steam flow rate by 5 percent, and an additional 20 years of operation could be linearly extrapolated for a total increase in steam flow (and therefore dose) of 7.5 percent.c.Discuss the basis for assuming an erosion rate of 0.004 in. per year, and include whether this is a conservative, realistic, or non-conservative assumption. d.Provide a copy of the calculation used to establish the 5 percent increase in steam flow after 40 years of operation, including descriptions of all relevant parameters. Also include relevant dimensions of the main steam line flow restrictors when initially installed and at the most recent inspection.Discussion: Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise thisquestion as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI.RAI 4.7.1-1 The applicant stated that 40 years of operation would increase steam                                 flow rate by no more than 5 percent, and an additional 20 years of                                               operation could be linearly extrapolated for a total increase in steam flow (and therefore dose) of 7.5 percent.a.Discuss the basis for assuming an erosion rate of 0.004 inches per year, andif this will be applicable for the term of extended operation. Include whether this is a conservative, realistic, or non-conservative assumption.b.Provide a copy of a calculation that demonstrates the acceptability of the mainsteam flow restrictors for the license renewal period. Include descriptions of all relevant parameters and provide the basis and justification for all assumptions.
Jeff Weik                                PPL Mike Detamore                            PPL Mike May                                  PPL Enclosure 1
Memo to PPL Susquehanna, LLC from E. Gettys dated September 18, 2007DISTRIBUTION
 
:  
DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC, held telephone conference calls on August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA).
D-RAI 4.7.1-1 In Section 4.7.1 of the SSES LRA, the licensee references Section 5.4.4.4 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Rev. 60, and then states that the main steam flow restrictors are resistant to erosion by comparing turbine inspection results made at the Dresden Unit 1 facility that revealed no noticeable effects from erosion on the stainless steel nozzle partitions.
: a.       Discuss any actual erosion rates that have been measured on main steam line flow restrictors at SSES or other nuclear plants. If there are no actual measured erosion rates available, discuss the basis for concluding that the main steam flow restrictors are resistant to erosion, and include in the discussion a detailed comparison of turbine nozzle partition and main steam flow restrictor materials. The materials comparison should include such salient points as material specifications used, chemistry limits of those specifications, and process controls for material fabricated in the late 1950s (Dresden) vs. the early 1980s (Susquehanna).
: b.       Section 5.4.4.3 of the FSAR, Rev. 60, states that surface finish has a minor effect on erosion-corrosion, and that very rough surfaces will erode more rapidly than smooth surfaces. Has the licensee verified that the exposed surfaces of the main steam line flow restrictors are sufficiently smooth to not undergo accelerated erosion?
Discussion: The applicants discussion of the historical precedence set by the FSAR, helped to clarify an issue for the staff. Therefore, the staff decided to withdraw the question, and it will not be sent as a formal RAI.
D-RAI 4.7.1-2 With an assumed erosion rate of 0.004 in. per year, the applicant stated that 40 years of operation would only increase steam flow rate by 5 percent, and an additional 20 years of operation could be linearly extrapolated for a total increase in steam flow (and therefore dose) of 7.5 percent.
: c.     Discuss the basis for assuming an erosion rate of 0.004 in. per year, and include whether this is a conservative, realistic, or non-conservative assumption.
Enclosure 2
: d.     Provide a copy of the calculation used to establish the 5 percent increase in steam flow after 40 years of operation, including descriptions of all relevant parameters. Also include relevant dimensions of the main steam line flow restrictors when initially installed and at the most recent inspection.
Discussion: Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI.
RAI 4.7.1-1 The applicant stated that 40 years of operation would increase steam flow rate by no more than 5 percent, and an additional 20 years of operation could be linearly extrapolated for a total increase in steam flow (and therefore dose) of 7.5 percent.
: a.     Discuss the basis for assuming an erosion rate of 0.004 inches per year, and if this will be applicable for the term of extended operation. Include whether this is a conservative, realistic, or non-conservative assumption.
: b.     Provide a copy of a calculation that demonstrates the acceptability of the main steam flow restrictors for the license renewal period. Include descriptions of all relevant parameters and provide the basis and justification for all assumptions.
Memo to PPL Susquehanna, LLC from E. Gettys dated September 18, 2007 DISTRIBUTION:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==


==SUMMARY==
==SUMMARY==
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 28,2007 AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEARREGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATIONHARD COPY: DLR RFE-MAIL:PUBLICSSmith (srs3)
OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 28, 2007 AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY:
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb
DLR RF E-MAIL:
 
PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)
RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb
SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes RGuzman BRogers EGettys
 
RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes


---------------
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
RGuzman BRogers EGettys Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:Cornelius J. GannonVice President - Nuclear Operations PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB3 Berwick, PA 18603-0467Robert M. PaleyGeneral Manager - Plant Support PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2 Berwick, PA 18603-0467Rocco R. SgarroManager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Allentown, PA 18101-1179Walter E. MorrisseySupervising Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Affairs PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4 Berwick, PA 18603-0467Michael H. CrowthersSupervising Engineer Nuclear Regulatory Affairs PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Allentown, PA 18101-1179Ronald E. SmithGeneral Manager - Site Preparedness and Services PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Steven M. CookManager - Quality Assurance PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2 Berwick, PA  18603-0467Luis A. RamosCommunity Relations Manager, Susquehanna PPL Susquehanna, LLC 634 Salem Blvd., SSO Berwick, PA 18603-0467Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.Associate General Counsel PPL Services Corporation Two North Ninth Street, GENTW3 Allentown, PA  18101-1179Supervisor - Document Control ServicesPPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Allentown, PA  18101-1179Richard W. OsborneAllegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Cornelius J. Gannon                  Luis A. Ramos Vice President - Nuclear Operations Community Relations Manager, PPL Susquehanna, LLC                   Susquehanna 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB3             PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA 18603-0467              634 Salem Blvd., SSO Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Robert M. Paley General Manager - Plant Support     Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.
212 Locust Street P.O. Box 1266 Harrisburg, PA  17108-1266Director, Bureau of Radiation ProtectionPennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building P.O. Box 8469 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P.O. Box 35, NUCSA4Berwick, PA  18603-0035Regional Administrator, Region 1U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PPL Susquehanna, LLC                 Associate General Counsel 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2             PPL Services Corporation Berwick, PA 18603-0467              Two North Ninth Street, GENTW3 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Rocco R. Sgarro Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Supervisor - Document Control Services PPL Susquehanna, LLC                PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4       Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Allentown, PA 18101-1179            Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Walter E. Morrissey                  Richard W. Osborne Supervising Engineer                 Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Nuclear Regulatory Affairs           212 Locust Street PPL Susquehanna, LLC                 P.O. Box 1266 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4             Harrisburg, PA 17108-1266 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection Michael H. Crowthers                Pennsylvania Department of Supervising Engineer                 Environmental Protection Nuclear Regulatory Affairs           Rachel Carson State Office Building PPL Susquehanna, LLC                 P.O. Box 8469 Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4       Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Senior Resident Inspector Ronald E. Smith                      U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission General Manager - Site Preparedness P.O. Box 35, NUCSA4 and Services                     Berwick, PA 18603-0035 PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4             Regional Administrator, Region 1 Berwick, PA 18603-0467               U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Steven M. Cook                      King of Prussia, PA 19406 Manager - Quality Assurance PPL Susquehanna, LLC                 Board of Supervisors 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2             Salem Township Berwick, PA 18603-0467              P.O. Box 405 Berwick, PA 18603-0035


475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA  19406Board of SupervisorsSalem Township P.O. Box 405 Berwick, PA  18603-0035 Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:-2-Dr. Judith JohnsrudNational Energy Committee Sierra Club 443 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803Ms. Julie KeysNuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708}}
Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:
Dr. Judith Johnsrud National Energy Committee Sierra Club 443 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803 Ms. Julie Keys Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708}}

Latest revision as of 11:53, 13 March 2020

and 09/05/2007 Summary of Telephone Conference Calls Between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Concerning D-RAI
ML072490046
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna  Talen Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/18/2007
From: Gettys E
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
To:
Susquehanna
Gettys Evelyn, NRR/DLR/RLRA 415-4029
References
Download: ML072490046 (8)


Text

September 18, 2007 LICENSEE: PPL Susquehanna, LLC FACILITY: Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALLS HELD ON AUGUST 28, 2007 AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC held telephone conference calls on August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007, to discuss and clarify the staffs draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, license renewal application. The telephone conference calls were useful in clarifying the intent of the staffs D-RAIs. provides a listing of the participants and Enclosure 2 contains a listing of the D-RAIs discussed with the applicant, including a brief description on the status of the items.

The applicant had an opportunity to comment on this summary.

/RA/

Evelyn Gettys, Project Manager License Renewal Branch A Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388

Enclosures:

1. List of Participants
2. List of Draft Requests for Additional Information cc w/encls: See next page

ML072490046 OFFICE PM:RLRA:DLR LA:DLR BC:RLRA:DLR NAME EGettys IKing DWrona for LLund DATE 09/07/07 09/07/07 09/18/07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION LIST OF PARTICIPANTS August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007 PARTICIPANTS AFFILIATIONS Evelyn Gettys U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

Allen Hiser NRC Andrew Johnson NRC Duane Filchner PPL Susquehanna, LLC (PPL)

Jeff Weik PPL Mike Detamore PPL Mike May PPL Enclosure 1

DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007 The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the staff) and Representatives of PPL Susquehanna, LLC, held telephone conference calls on August 28, 2007 and September 5, 2007, to discuss and clarify the following draft requests for additional information (D-RAIs) concerning the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (SSES), Units 1 and 2, license renewal application (LRA).

D-RAI 4.7.1-1 In Section 4.7.1 of the SSES LRA, the licensee references Section 5.4.4.4 of the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Rev. 60, and then states that the main steam flow restrictors are resistant to erosion by comparing turbine inspection results made at the Dresden Unit 1 facility that revealed no noticeable effects from erosion on the stainless steel nozzle partitions.

a. Discuss any actual erosion rates that have been measured on main steam line flow restrictors at SSES or other nuclear plants. If there are no actual measured erosion rates available, discuss the basis for concluding that the main steam flow restrictors are resistant to erosion, and include in the discussion a detailed comparison of turbine nozzle partition and main steam flow restrictor materials. The materials comparison should include such salient points as material specifications used, chemistry limits of those specifications, and process controls for material fabricated in the late 1950s (Dresden) vs. the early 1980s (Susquehanna).
b. Section 5.4.4.3 of the FSAR, Rev. 60, states that surface finish has a minor effect on erosion-corrosion, and that very rough surfaces will erode more rapidly than smooth surfaces. Has the licensee verified that the exposed surfaces of the main steam line flow restrictors are sufficiently smooth to not undergo accelerated erosion?

Discussion: The applicants discussion of the historical precedence set by the FSAR, helped to clarify an issue for the staff. Therefore, the staff decided to withdraw the question, and it will not be sent as a formal RAI.

D-RAI 4.7.1-2 With an assumed erosion rate of 0.004 in. per year, the applicant stated that 40 years of operation would only increase steam flow rate by 5 percent, and an additional 20 years of operation could be linearly extrapolated for a total increase in steam flow (and therefore dose) of 7.5 percent.

c. Discuss the basis for assuming an erosion rate of 0.004 in. per year, and include whether this is a conservative, realistic, or non-conservative assumption.

Enclosure 2

d. Provide a copy of the calculation used to establish the 5 percent increase in steam flow after 40 years of operation, including descriptions of all relevant parameters. Also include relevant dimensions of the main steam line flow restrictors when initially installed and at the most recent inspection.

Discussion: Based on the discussion with the applicant, the staff agreed to revise this question as follows. The revised question will be sent as a formal RAI.

RAI 4.7.1-1 The applicant stated that 40 years of operation would increase steam flow rate by no more than 5 percent, and an additional 20 years of operation could be linearly extrapolated for a total increase in steam flow (and therefore dose) of 7.5 percent.

a. Discuss the basis for assuming an erosion rate of 0.004 inches per year, and if this will be applicable for the term of extended operation. Include whether this is a conservative, realistic, or non-conservative assumption.
b. Provide a copy of a calculation that demonstrates the acceptability of the main steam flow restrictors for the license renewal period. Include descriptions of all relevant parameters and provide the basis and justification for all assumptions.

Memo to PPL Susquehanna, LLC from E. Gettys dated September 18, 2007 DISTRIBUTION:

SUBJECT:

SUMMARY

OF TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CALL HELD ON AUGUST 28, 2007 AND SEPTEMBER 5, 2007, BETWEEN THE U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION AND PPL SUSQUEHANNA, LLC, CONCERNING DRAFT REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2, LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION HARD COPY:

DLR RF E-MAIL:

PUBLIC SSmith (srs3)

SDuraiswamy RidsNrrDlr RidsNrrDlrRlra RidsNrrDlrRlrb RidsNrrDlrRlrc RidsNrrDlrReba RidsNrrDlrRebb RidsNrrDci RidsNrrDra RidsNrrDe RidsNrrDeEemb RidsNrrDeEeeb RidsNrrDss RidsOgcMailCenter RidsNrrAdes RGuzman BRogers EGettys

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Cornelius J. Gannon Luis A. Ramos Vice President - Nuclear Operations Community Relations Manager, PPL Susquehanna, LLC Susquehanna 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB3 PPL Susquehanna, LLC Berwick, PA 18603-0467 634 Salem Blvd., SSO Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Robert M. Paley General Manager - Plant Support Bryan A. Snapp, Esq.

PPL Susquehanna, LLC Associate General Counsel 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2 PPL Services Corporation Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Two North Ninth Street, GENTW3 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Rocco R. Sgarro Manager - Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Supervisor - Document Control Services PPL Susquehanna, LLC PPL Susquehanna, LLC Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Walter E. Morrissey Richard W. Osborne Supervising Engineer Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc.

Nuclear Regulatory Affairs 212 Locust Street PPL Susquehanna, LLC P.O. Box 1266 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4 Harrisburg, PA 17108-1266 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 Director, Bureau of Radiation Protection Michael H. Crowthers Pennsylvania Department of Supervising Engineer Environmental Protection Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Rachel Carson State Office Building PPL Susquehanna, LLC P.O. Box 8469 Two North Ninth Street, GENPL4 Harrisburg, PA 17105-8469 Allentown, PA 18101-1179 Senior Resident Inspector Ronald E. Smith U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission General Manager - Site Preparedness P.O. Box 35, NUCSA4 and Services Berwick, PA 18603-0035 PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSA4 Regional Administrator, Region 1 Berwick, PA 18603-0467 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road Steven M. Cook King of Prussia, PA 19406 Manager - Quality Assurance PPL Susquehanna, LLC Board of Supervisors 769 Salem Blvd., NUCSB2 Salem Township Berwick, PA 18603-0467 P.O. Box 405 Berwick, PA 18603-0035

Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Dr. Judith Johnsrud National Energy Committee Sierra Club 443 Orlando Avenue State College, PA 16803 Ms. Julie Keys Nuclear Energy Institute 1776 I Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006-3708