IR 05000412/1987001

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-412/87-01 on 870105-09.No Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Procedure Preparation,Staffing & Implementation for Operations,Maint & Instrumentation & Control Areas in Preparation for OL
ML20210G811
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley
Issue date: 01/30/1987
From: Finkel A, Jerrica Johnson, Denise Wallace
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20210G781 List:
References
50-412-87-01, 50-412-87-1, NUDOCS 8702110333
Download: ML20210G811 (8)


Text

. '

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report N /87-01 Docket N License N CPPR-105 Licensee: Duquesne Light Company P.O. Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 Facility Name: Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit N Inspection At: Shippingport, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted: January 5-9, 1987 Inspectors: 4 gd & </so/s ?

A. Finkel, Lead Reactor Engineer date LU WA y'D/e7 T lallace, Reactor Engineer date Approved by: A k* r A l]30)I7 J. JMnson, T.hief date Operational Programs " action Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Inspection Summary: Routine, unannounced inspection conducted on January 5-9 ,

1987 (Report No. 50-412/87-01)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of licensee activities in the

, area of procedure preparation, staffing and implementation for operations, I maintenance, and instrumentation and control areas in preparation for an

operating license. The inspection was conducted onsite by two region based inspectors.

l Results: No violations were identified.

!

!

3 870202 l h

kDO K 0500

. -

DETAILS 1.0 persons Contacted Duquesne Light Company

  • J. Kasunick, Maintenance Director
  • A. Lerczak, Unit 2 Operations Procedure Supervisor
  • C. Majumdar, Assistant Director, Quality Control
  • J. Rabenau, Compliance Engineer
  • R. Swiderski, Start-Up Manager
  • C. Teamasla, Instrumentation and Control Supervisor
  • A. Wargo, Assistant Director Stone and Webster Engineering Company
  • P. Bienick, Assistant Engineering Superintendent
  • Byrnes, Assistant Project Manager
  • Wittschen, Licensing Engineer United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
  • J. Beall, Senior Resident Inspector
  • A. Asars, Resident Inspector
  • Denotes those present at the exit intervie The inspectors also held discussions with managers, supervisors and other licensee employees during the course of the inspection, including operations, technical and administrative personne .0 Maintenance / Instrumentation and Control

, The purpose of this inspection was to review and evaluate the licensee's

.

program plans for controlling safety-related Maintenance and Instrument-

'

ation and Control activities; and to continue to assess the progress of'

administrative controls established to date in preperation for an operating licens Documents reviewed by the inspector are listed in

, Appendix A to this report.

l

,

The inspector's review of selected Maintenance Work Requests verified that the Maintenance and I&C staffs were complying with the requirements of the station administrative controls for implementing certain tests and ,

i maintenance.

l No violations. or deviations were identified.

i

'

l

-.- - - . - . . . __ , . .

T

. .

3.0 Surveillance Testing and Calibration Control Program .

The Unit 2 Technical Specification (TS) Procedure and FSAR Matrix lists the TS Surveillance Paragraph No.'s and the procedure No.'s that are required to be followed to satisfy the surveillance requiremen .1 Surveillance Testing The inspector verified that the TS requirements, Revision 1, were transcribed into selected surveillance procedures (see Appendix A for sample reviewed), that the data taken during testing of the equipment met the TS requirements, and that the responsible supervisor reviewed and signed the data shee .1.2 Surveillance Testing of the 125VDC Control System The inspector walked down the DC battery system which included the follawing components:

--Station batteries No. 2-1 and No. 2-2 and the associated battery rooms;

--Battery chargers 2 BAT *CHG 2-1 and 2-2 as well as units 2 BAT *CHG 2-5 and 2-7;

--Battery breakers No.3 BAT *BKR'S, 2-1 and 2-2 and BAT *BKR'S'2-5 and 2-6; and,

--Selected power and instrumentation cables for cable termin-ation and resistent contact resistance (see Paragraph 3. below).

Using the latest surveillance test records the inspector verified that the test results were within the procedure requirements and that the TS surveillance requirements were performed within the required tim Appendix A lists the documentation reviewed by the inspecto No violation or deviations were identifie .1.3 Independent Measurements of Contact Resistance To measure contact resistance, the licensee uses a Thermal Viewer to inspect terminal connectors and selected transformer The Thermal Viewer is calibrated by the user with a known temp-eratur The Thermal Viewer display is green and thermal differences are displayed as bright green for high temperatures and a less intense green for lower temperature Using a calibrated temperature value for an acceptance criteria, the inspector was able to determine that the cable terminations display was within an acceptable temperature rang e

F

. .

The licensee plans to establish base line temperature test data on selected components using the above referenced test equipment for establishing the temperature profiles of components. These procedures are expected to be issued after fuel loa No violations or deviations were identifie .2 Calibration Control Program The Calibration and Control Program is defined in the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS)1/2 Maintenance Manual, Section 2, Control and Calibration of Measuring Devices, Revision The licensee has established frequency codes for their safety-related equipment; this data has been inputted into a computer recall program that is part of the Maintenance Planning and Scheduling System (MPS).

Equipment listed in Appendix A was verified by the inspector to be tested in accordance with the requirements of the Maintenance Manual Section 2; and was also listed in the MPS progra The inspector verified that the test equipment located in the electrical and mechanical maintenance shop areas was listed in the MPS system, was within the calibration dates, and that the responsible supervisor was knowledgeable about the calibration recall progra No violations or deviations were identifie .0 Valve Position Verification Valve position verification is established for manual and motor operated valves per licensee procedures MTP-902, Revision 5, Initial Operating Procedure for Manual Valves and MTP-942, Revision 2, Motor Operated Valve Initial Mechanical Checkou These two procedures are used to establish the open and closed position of valves during the initial operating test phase. Operating Surveillance Procedure No. 2.06.06 is used to verify the Technical Specification (TS) requirements of paragraph 4.3.3.8 and table 4.3.7 for valves liste During a walk down of selected safety-related systems the inspector verified that both manual and motor operated valves were in their correct valve position per valve alignment drawings and that the valve position indicators were pinnned to the shaft as required by the installation drawings. The valves observed are listed in Appendix No violations or deviations were identifie _ . . .

. -

'

5.0 Operating Procedures Review ,

-

The inspector reviewed selected operating manual chapters and operating procedures to verify technical adequacy including compliance to Technical Specifications (Rev 1) and Final Safety Analysis Report (Amendment 12)

requirement Walk through inspections were performed to validate procedure references, prerequisites, precautions, valve lineup requirements and procedural steps. Documents reviewed are listed in Appendix .1 Residsual Heat Removal System Inspection During a walk-through of the Residual Heat Removal System (RHS) while using Operating Manual Chapter 10, Section A, Rev 1. " Residual Heat Removal System Startup" as the criteria, the inspector identified the following condition Step 1.a states " Verify CCP [ Primary Plant Component Cooling Water] is greater than 70 F on [2CCP-TI145A], vertical board-Section C, prior to establishing flow through the RHS heat exchangers". However, the inspector determined that instrument 2CCP-TI145A is a local dial thermometer found on the RHS heat exchanger CCP inlet, and does not indicate on the control boar The licensee agreed that this was a procedural error and that the outlet temperature for the CCP side of the RHS heat exchanger, which is indicated on the control board, is normally used to indicate the desired CCP temperatur Step 4.1 states ".. . . Hot Leg temperature RCDR, is greater than 50F or the RCS boron concentration is less than the RCS concentra-tion..." This statement is unclear as writte Operations personnel promptly responded to these comments by initiating the proper notification to the procedures group of needed change The inspector reviewed the licensee rework / maintenance activities in progress on the RHS (Residual Heat Removal) System to determine

! whether this work would affect pre-operational test results already completed. In particular, the inspector was concerned as to how the Minimum Flow Recirculation Valves (RHS#101 and #102) were to be returned to their Administratively Controlled, throttled positions after maintenance. Discussion with the licensee identified that Administrative Procedure 1/2.48.3 would be used to control mechanical and electrical equipment, but that the procedure was in the process of review at this tim Because the Residual Heat Removal System is undergoing a large amount of rework at this time, the RHS Preopera-tional Test Procedure is to be used to ensure system operability

after rework activities are complet ,

i

_ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _. - . _ _ _ , _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ , , _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . . . _ _ .

. .

The inspector had no further questions, No violations or deviations *

were observe ~

6.0 Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee management representatives (see section 1.0 for attendees) at an exit meeting on January 9,1987. The inspector summarized the scope and findings of the inspection at that tim At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector t

- -- . . - - . _ - - _ -

. . -

APPENDIX A Operational Manual and Procedures Reviewed

,

Chapter 10 * Residual Heat Removal (RHR), Issue 1, Revision 1, November 9, 1986

-

Chapter 53A Emergency Operating Procedures (E0P's)

--ECA-0.0. Loss of All AC Power, Revision 1, November 4, 1986

--F-0.5. Containment, Revision 1, Issue 1, November 14, 1986

--FR-Z.1. Response to High Containment Pressure, Revision 0, November 14, 1986

'

--F.0.2. Core Cooling, Issue 1, Revision 1, November 14, 1986

--FR-C.I. Response to Inadequate Core Cooling, Issue 1, Revision 1, November 14, 198 *The inspector walked the RHR System performing a valve inspection of the system using the as-built drawing Startup Manual Procedures Reviewed Chapter 1 BVPS-2 Startup Group Organization and Responsibilities, Revision 4, May 20, 198 Chapter 2 Administrative Controls and General Instructions, Revision Q, August 27, 198 Chapter Change Request, Revision 2, May 30, 198 Chapter 4.8.1 Operation of the Startup Group Calibration Facility, Revision 1, May 30, 198 Battery System Surveillance Data Reports Reviewed Battery Air Circuit Breakers - Preventative Maintenance Procedure (PMP)

Nos. 2-39-BYS-BKRs 1,2,5,6,1E Station Battery Charger - Preventative Maintenance Procedure (PMP)

Nos. 2-39 BYS-CHG 1,2,5,6,7,3E Station Battery - Preventative Maintenance Procedure Nos. 2 MSP-39.02-E, Revision Q, 2MSP-39.01-E Revision 2 Maintenance /I&C Procedures Reviewed Station Battery Inspection and Interconnector Resistance Check, Revision 1, November 15, 198 , . .

APPENDIX A Pressure Loop 2RCS-P444 Calibration, Revision 3, 1986, Procedure 2MSP-6,48-1

'

Rx Trip and ESF Logic, Procedure MSP2-01.15 Power Range Det. N41, Procedure MSP2-02.03 RC Temp Loop 2RCS-7412, Procedure MSP2-06.20 Reactor Protection Logic, Procedure MSP2-02.04 Procedures Verified for Technical Specification Compliance MSP2-01.15 Rx Trip & ESF Logic TS 4.3.1.1.3.02 MSP2-02.03 Power Range Det. N41 TS 4.3.1.1.1.02 MSP2-06.20 RC TEMP Loop 2RCS-7412 TS 4.3.1.1.1.07 MSP2-01.04 Reactor Protection-Logic TS 4.3.1.1.1.19 MSP2-06.03 Loop 21 RC Flow 2RCS-F414 TS 4.3.1.1.1.12 MSP2-06.13 PZR Press Loop 2RCS-P456 TS 4.3.1.1.1.10 MSP1-19-05 Gas Vent Flow F-GW103 TS 4.3.3.10.1. MSP1-43.21 Gas Process RM-GW108A TS 4.3.3.10.1. MSP2-01.01 Loop Stop VLV TR A TS 4.4.01. Calbrated Equipment & History Reviewed Wheatstone Bridge Gauge Blocks Megohm Bridge Snap-on Torque Wrench Testor DC Voltmeter Dynamometers Digital Thermometer Multimeter Meggers Valves Inspected Rain Steam Isolation Trip Valves 2 MSS *HYV101,A,8 and C RHR Inlet Isolation Valves MOV 701A and B and 702 A and B RHR Outlet Isolation Valves MOV 720A and B RHR HX Bypass Control Valves FCV 605 A and B l

l

2