IR 05000334/1988014

Insp Repts 50-334/88-14 & 50-412/88-09 on 880425-29.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Unresolved Items,Plan & Implementing Procedures,Organization,Program Audit,Records & Repts,Testing & Maint

ML20155F527
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	06/07/1988
From:	Keimig R, Lancaster W, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20155F512	List: IR 05000334/1988014 ML20155F508
References
50-334-88-14, 50-412-88-09, 50-412-88-9, NUDOCS 8806160417
Download: ML20155F527 (7)

Text

_ .

"

. '.=-

PrlLEED M r %. -

g gj Kl,7' ' '

~

tn:: i f,4 [ ti ""* n'=M .

ucmisaz

0.%l.::II AIW:1)

'- '- *8 MW U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Reports No /88-14 50-412/88-09 Docket Nos. 50-334 50-412 License Nos. DPR-66 NPF-73 Licensee: Duquesne Light Company 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Facility Name: Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2

.

'

Inspection At: Shippingport, Pennsylvania Inspection Conducted: April 25-29, 1988 Type of Inspectior.: Routine Unannounced Physical Security Inspectors: b-h - N V. K. LanT: aster, Physical Security Inspector date I

)G.C. Aww Smith,SafeguardsSpecialistGlG24 / dite at: roved by: . . .de +1 f d 7- 88 R. R. Keirni% Chief feguards Section, date Division of Radiat Safety and Safeguards Inspection Summary: Routine Unannoui. 2d Physical Security Inspection on April 25-29, 1988 (Report Nos. 50-334/88-14, 50-412/08-09)

Areas Inspected: Follow-up on unresolved items; plan and implementing procedures; organization; program audit; records and reports; testing and i

raintenance; locks, keys, and combinations; physical barriers protected area; physical barriers - vital areas; system power supply; lighting; compensatory

reasures; assessment aids; access control personnel; access control packages; access control-vehicles; detection aids protected area; detection aids-vital

'

areas; alarm stations; communications; training and qualifications; and hardling of safeguards informatio Results: The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas examine PDR ADOCK 05000334 -

. - - _ .

.9 . DCD - , , _ . - - - , , _ . . . _ - - . . . - . . - - . - - . . - - . - . - _ _ _ , - . _ _ . . ,

..- ..-

..

-- . .

.

. . . . . ..

,.

.

...- ,

.

OETAILS Key Persons Contacted Licensee and Contractor:

W. Lacey, General Manager, Nuclear Operations Department W. Roy, Manager Administrative Servi _ces F. Lipchick, Senior Licensing Supervisor H. Harper, Director of Security M. -Johnston, Security Operations Supervisor D. Kline, Security Administrator N. DiPietro, Security Procedures and Training Coordinator W. Clutter, Security Force Supervisor, Security Bureau Incorporated (SBI)

W. Walker, Assistant Security Force Supervisor, SBI J. Gagliano, Security Equipment Coordinator, SBI J. Collins, Manager, Nuclear Security, SBI-R. Hecht, Site Instrumentation and Controls (I&C) Director G. Patterson, I&C Engineer M. Rencheck I&C Engineer J. Russell, Senior Quality Assurance Specialist b, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

J. Beall, Senior Resident Inspector

"S. Pindale, Resident Inspector The inspectors also interviewed other licensee and contractor security personne *Not at the exit interview Follow-up on Unresolved Items Closed (50-412/87-54-03): Review licensee's Vital Area validation study and corrective actions relative to vital plugs and hatches. The inspec-tors reviewed the licensee's Vital Area validation study and actions taken to identify plugs and hatches to Vital Areas and equipment. All plugs and hatches have been identified and are being appropriately controlled in accordance with the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan) and applicable regulatory requirement . Security Plan and Implementing Procedures The inspectors met with licensee representatives and discussed the Plan and its implementing procedures. As a result of these discussions, and a review of the Plan, it was determined that:

_ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

,

. .

. .

!.

(a) Implementing procedures were current, clear, concise and consistent with-commitments in the Plan; and (b) A 10 CFR 50.54(p) change to the licensee's Plan is in the process of being submitted to the NRC for revie . Security Organization The inspectors reviewed the security organization and determined that the organization was consistent with commitments in the Plan. Both licensee personnel and contractor personnel were interviewed by the inspectors and were found to be knowledgeable of their duties and respnnsibilitie The licensee has hired four Security Shift Administrators (SSA's) to oversee the security force contractor on each shif Three of the SSA's have beer. trained and are assigned to shift The fourth SSA was still in train'ig during the inspectio . Security program Audit The inspectors reviewed security program audit reports and verified that the audits had been conducted in accordance with the Plan. The audits were comprehensive in scope with the results reported to the appropriate levels of management. The review included the response of the security organization ~to the audit findings and the corrective actions taken to remedy any adverse finding The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the finding . Records and Reports The inspectors reviewed testing and maintenance records, records of security events and incident reports, Testing and Maintenance Records:

The testing and maintenance records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily available for licensee review and NRC inspection.

4 Security Event Reports:

The inspectors reviewed, and discussed with the licensee, the security events that had been reported to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 73.71(c), since November 25, 1987. No discrepancies were identified relativt to reporting the events or the actions taken, Security Incident Reports:

The inspectors' review of security incident reports, which require logging as opposed to prompt notification of the NRC, disclosed that all incidents received appropriate management review and follow-up, as required.

b

.

.

.

.

.

. Testing and Maintenance The inspectors reviewed the testing and maintenance records and pro-cedures for the intrusion detection system, access control system, search equipment and assessment aid The inspectors determined by record review, inspection of equipment, and interviews of security personnel, that there has been an improve-ment in maintenance support for security equipment since the previous inspection in November, 1987. As an example, during the previous inspection, in approximately 50% of the Unit 1 perimeter zones, the intrusion detection system was inoperable. During a tour of the Protected Area on April 27, 1988, the inspectors noted that all of the Protected Area perimeter intrusion detection zones were operable and that there were no compensatory measures in place, due to inoper-able equipmen I Ih{M PAMEPR P:100':7f!N3 39,mpp"ng f0.!ISiTiUll 7,0 !c ggy pg ,[g,

'

.hE. III3 iMNI'ONid.[

,

t - . . .u. . ,c (. Locks, Keys, ana Lombinations The inspectors reviewed the procedures for locks, keys, and combinations and determined that they were consistent with commitments in the Pla This determination was made by reviewing records and interviewing the Security Equipment Coordinato . Physical Barriers - Protected Areas The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of the Protected Area barrie The inspectors determined, by observation, that the barrier was installed and c.aintaired as described in the Pla . Physical Barriers - Vital Areas The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of all Vital Areas in Units 1 and 2. The inspectors determined, by observation, that the barriers were installed and maintained as described in the Pla THIS PWPAMi CODTfdNS SfHGUARDS iWCW' Air 'm 6 twi,rg;::3,Lic O!SCL"IU:iE. !! IS !?ii!!iT'0Hi, tty

!.l .:i 21.A.li .;

.. .

-

. .

-

II!!S lim'lRAP.!! CMTA[N3 g l (rlf d[!M A!,1N /1!013 tpir gpg pgg*3 l OSUfE  ;

U,f,$9Cl.RN:j,

.TT .

. l! lS ll!IENT.'ONALty

. . 1 1 Security System Power Supply

.The inspectors reviewed the emergency power supply for the security system and found it to be in accordance with the Pla . Lighting The inspectors observed the lighting within the Protected Area during the hours of darkness (8:30 p.m. to 11:15 p.m.) on April 26, 1988. All areas were adequately lighted to allow observation of activities and to meet commitments in the Pla . Compensatory Measures The inspectors observed the implementation of compensatory measures utilized as a result of a short duration computer malfunction. These measures were found tc be in conformance with the Plan and the licensee's implementing procedure '

14. Assessment Aids The inspectors observed the operation of the assessment aids system, including times when artificial lighting was being used (see paragraph 12), anc' determined it to be functioning in accordance with the Pla I!fI3 Ild' OlP' Tii CD'JT Apl3 T,, ryggqg3 1:!FamAte'., !!g ;3 g g7 f 03 FDDLIC UIECEDNRE, !T G jHIENTl0iU; tty LEFT StA!!M.

l 1 Access Control-Personnel The inspectors cbserved that all persornel entering t"e Protected Area

> are searched for unauthorized material and that persornel access controls

! and search equipment are adequete and appropriate for their intended purpose. The licensee is in conformance with the Plan and regulatory requirements.

l l

!

l i

L -

___ ____ _______ _

- . .

,

4 't ,

,

6-

'

16. Access Control-Packages

1

The inspectors observed that the licensee controls the flow of packages and materials into and out of the Prote:ted Area. Packages are searched and materials are appropriately examined using equipment and procedures which are adequate for the purpose. The licensee is in conformance with the Plan and regulatory requirement . Access Control-Vehicles The inspectors observed that the licensee searches and escorts, as required, all vehicles that enter the Protected Area and searches all vehicles that exit. The licensee controls all vehicles in conformance with the Plan and implementing procedure :

1 Detection Aids-protected Areas

- The inspectors observed the Protected Area perimeter detection aids and determined that they were installed, maintained, and operated as committed to in the Pla . Detection Aids-Vital Areas The inspectors reviewed, selectively tested in the presence of a licensee representative and observed guard force response to the Vital Area detection aids. The detection aids are in conformance with the Plan, the tests verified that the alarms are functioning properly, and the guard force response was promp . Alarm Stations The inspectors observed the operation of both the Central Alarm Station (CAS) and Seconcary Alarm Station (SAS) and found them to be operating as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by the inspectors and were found to be knowledoeable of their duties and responsibilitie . Communications

- The inspectors observed tests of all communication capabilities in both the CAS and the SAS. The inspectors also reviewed testing records for the various means of communications available to the security force atid found them to be as committed in the Pla . Personnel Training and Qualification-General Requirements The inspectors observed tactical response training for armed security officers at their firearms training range on April 27, 198 No deficiencies were observe r .

]

.- .

. .

.

23. Physical Protection Safeguards Information The inspectors determined, by observation and by review of selected records, that the physical protection of Safeguards Information (SGI)

was as committed to in the Pla . Exit Interview The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on April 29, 1988. At that time,

, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings were presente At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspectors.