IR 05000334/1987017

Partially Withheld Physical Security Insp Repts 50-334/87-17 & 50-412/87-66 on 871123-25 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plan & Implementing Procedures,Program Audits & Records & Repts

ML20196C731
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	02/03/1988
From:	Keimig R, Madden T, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20196C704	List: IR 05000334/1987017 ML20196C700
References
50-334-87-17, 50-412-87-66, NUDOCS 8802160218
Download: ML20196C731 (5)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:._ . .. .

?:nuana ty. . .     >
, f 2 80wG  /._  ls
{tw3)  / (3:c.urs&-

V Lf&hneau/T J - S* ~ SW

. ec w :..a z n :: :1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ' , REGION I '

      ,

i 50-412/87-66 Report Nos. 50-334/87-17 '

.
      .

50-412

Docket Nos. 50-334 i " OPR-28 l License Ncs. NPF-73 l i  ! Licensee: Ouquesne Light Company  ! 435 Sixth Avenue i

      '

l Fittsburgh, Pennsylvania

) Facility Name: Beaver Valley Power Station, Units 1 and 2  ,

' Inspection At: Shippingport, Pennsylvania f Inspection Conducted: November 23-25, 1987 Type of Inspe ion: (Routine Unannounced physical Security

< Inspectors:

_. Smi M

  , Safeguards Specialist

_ 1 1 t ._ _ , Idate I /d 1 i f1( l T. Madden, Physical Security Inspector ida1/e

   . .
;

Approved by: .* M ; =f e2*8-88 ;

.
  . R. Keimig W ef, eguards Section, date -

Division of Radiati Safety and Safeguards l Inspection Summary: Routine Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on

      ,

fievember 23-25, 1987 (Report Nos. 50-334/87-17, 50-412/87-66)

      !
'

Areas Inspected: Plan and Implementing Procedures; Program Audits; Records i and Reports; Testing and Maintenance; Physical Barriers - Protected Area; , i Physical Barriers - Vital Areas; Assessment Aids; Detection Aids; Alarm  !

Stations; and Training and Qualification I i I j Results: The licensee was in compliance wi'.h NRC requirements in the areas

; examine i A K

. a i

_ _ . . . ._ .. . . . _ . . _. . _ _ .. _

        '
.
        !
        * v

' , , f

        ;

i f i DETAILS  ! 4  !

Xey Persons Contacted  ; Licensee and Contractor

-e

J. Sieber, Vice President - Nuclea l l W. Roy, Manager Administrative Services  : 1 F. Lipchick, Senior licensing Supervisor

   -
        !

} E. Ewing, Manager, Quality Assurance i j H. Harper, Director of Security i M. Johnston, Security Operations Supervisor i D. Hunkele, Director of Quality Assurance Operations

       ,

_

        .
-

D. Roman, Supervisor Quality Assurance - Maintenance  ; I E. Clutter, Assistant Security Force Supervisor l

0. Kline, Security Administrator " ! N. DiPietro, Security Procedures and Training Coordinator * l T. Salvic, Nuclear Engineering  ;

D. Murcko, I&C Engineer 4 J. Crockett, Senior Manager, Nuclear Operations

R. Hecht, Site I&C Director  ! ) N. Tonet, General Manager Nuclear Engineering and Records  ! j P. Udon, Security Force Supervisor, Security Bureau Incorporated  ;

        , U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:     !

, J. Beall, Senior Resident Inspector i S. Pindale, Resident Inspector i The inspectors also interviewed uther licensee and contractor security

personne ,

) Security Plan and Implementing Procedures

        ,

The inspectors met with licensee representatives and discussed the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan (the Plan). As a result of these  ; a

discussions, inspection, and a review of the Plan, it was determined that changes, to incorporate the revisions required by the miscellaneous amendments codified by the NRC on August 4, 1986, were submitted to the i NRC as required. The inspectors informed the licensee that they are i , currently under revie , l All security personnel interviewed, both licensee and security contractor, demonstrated familiarity with the Plan, Implementing i Procedures and NRC performance objectives.

) Security Program Audit The inspectors reviewed security program audit reports and verified that . the audits had been conducted as com.mitted to in the Plan. The review l

i < _

 - -- -
  - _ . -_. . - . . - - . ,_ .---, . _ . - - - , - . - _  -'

.
     ,

3 included the responses from the security organization to the audit find-ings and the corrective actions taken to remedy any adverse findings. The documented corrective actions appeared appropriate for the finding . Records and Reports The inspectors reviewed testing and maintenance records and records of security events, Testing and Maintenance Records: The testing and main:enance records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily available for inspectio Security Event Reports: The inspectors reviewed, and discussed with the licensee, all security events that had been reported to the NRC in accordance with 10 CFR 73.71(c) since January 1, 1987. No discrepancies were identified relative to reporting the events or the actions take . Testing and Maintenance The inspectors reviewed the testing and maintenance records and procedures for the intrusion detection system, access control system, search equip-ment and assessment aid The inspectors determined by record review, inspection of equipment, and by interviewing security personnel that extensive time was required for repair of Unit 1 security equipment. As an example, intrusion detection zones identified as being inoperative for a period in excess of 60 days during NRC Region I Inspection Number 50-412/S7-39 (May, 1987) and requiring compensation by a manned post, were still inoperative during this inspectio The licensee was advised that compensatory measures that are in effect for

!

more than 60 days constitute a modification to the licensee's commitment in the NRC-approved security plan and require the submittal of a Plan chang The licensee's representative stated that he had not viewed this as requiring e. Plan change and committed to repair the deficient zones within 60 days. The upkeep of Unit 2 security systems and equipment did not l appear to be a problem, at this tim (See paragraph 9).

l Physical Barriers - (Protected Area) The inspectors conducted a physical inspection of the protected area barrie It was determined, by observation, that the barriers were l installed and maintained as described in the Plan. However, the inspec- ! tors observed that the isolation zone committed to in the Plan was being i infringed upon by workers preparing the facility for an upcoming Unit 1

>

     :

l l l

     '

. . -.  .-.- -_  -- - . . .
.       :

i i e e

.

j 4 , i f

.

ou't a g The licensee took prompt. action.to correct the problem and agreed ! l to ensure that outage workers were aware of the requirements to maintain i

the isolation zone and that security personnel would be alert for-such  ; , problems,

l i ,

' il!lS P!,P f R" Ni CO?!T/'NS SAFEGUARDS ' INTORM'Un" ";; G NOT T01 PUBlic ! UISCUISMi, il lP CliEN!' gig,[[y L EF r " t ,u,

l 2 , Physical Barriers - (Vital Areas) The inspectors observed vital area barriers and determined them to be installed and maintained as committed to in the Plan, 1  : j Assessment Aids ,

I  ! The inscetters observed the use of assessment aids in both the CAS and

,

SAS. With the exception of three aids, which were properly compensated .

; for, all were operating and met their intended functio :

Detection Aids - Protected Area

! The it.spectors observed the protected area perimeter detection aids and f deterained that they were installed as committed to in the Plan. However, ,

1 some Unit 3 equipment operability problems were being encountered for { which proper compensatory measures had been established, where require l The Unit 2 portion of the 105 was functioning as committed to in the Pltn, i

      !

lt 7 e"n) .

   '
    . ']CO'II?lNSSAFECUARDS

.

    , 4 F. N OT [0,1 p g 3[jg

. IIN 0 Mi. H l~ PiiGilgly;[[y i

:

LETT !uM.

l

i l 10. Alarm Stations

!

1 The inspectors observed that the operation of both the CAS and SAS and found them to be operating as committed to in the Plan, i l i l ,  !

. <

     .__- ____ -
.
.
    .
.

.

i 1 Training and Qualification - Generel Requirements The inspectors reviewed training records for eleven individual These records included armed guards, unarmed watch persons, and supervisor It was determined that these records documented the training com.mitted to in the Plan and were maintained as committed to in the Plan, 1 Followup on Licensee Identified Violation t U!IS P/.I'W Il' f Pi;py,tg e qqqgg I.T07:'" ' .y i ; c v ,3 I' ' i u a . L ; . .. ,ld' f t t-.. . u ,, This is a licensee identified violation that'was determined by the inspectors to have had minimal impact on security, i 1 Exit Interview i The inspectors met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph ) 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on November 25, 1987. At that time, i the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings ' were presente ) At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector ;

      !

l I j n }}