IR 05000412/1987030

Partially Withheld Preoperational Security Program Review Insp Rept 50-412/87-30 on 870406-10 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Major Areas Inspected:Status of Security Program Implementation. Implementation of Security Program Progressing on Schedule

ML20214Q795
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	05/15/1987
From:	Bailey R, Keimig R, Galen Smith NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20214Q759	List: IR 05000412/1987030 ML20214Q756
References
50-412-87-30, IEC-77-04, IEC-80-09, IEIN-79-16, IEIN-82-07, IEIN-83-15, IEIN-83-27, IEIN-83-36, IEIN-83-83, IEIN-85-079, IEIN-85-097, IEIN-86-027, IEIN-86-055, IEIN-86-083, IEIN-86-088, IEIN-86-091, IEIN-87-011, NUDOCS 8706050192
Download: ML20214Q795 (7)

Text

- . . . . . -_____

.

I U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I  :

,

Report N /87-30 _  !

l Docket N l

.

License N CPPR-105 Licensee: Duquesne Light Company 435 Sixth Avenue

} Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Facility Name

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 2 i )

Inspection At: Shippingport, Pennsylvania i

Review Conducted: April 6-10, 1987

.i Date of Last P' perptional Security Program Review: January 26-30, 1987

}

Inspectors: %(/ 61s' ~7 Smith, Safe ards Specialist dath '

~

R. J. Bail '

.

'P h Ah 5 /S /SY \

curity Inspector date '

l Approved by: 4 R. Keimi);,-ChiaL_ S f' [ /00 guards Section date i

Inspection Summary:

~ Preoperational Security Program Review on April 6-10, 1987_(Report N /87-30)

!

Areas Inspected: Status of security program implementation, including:

Security Plan; Physical Barriers - Protected Area; Assessment Aids; Access Controls (Personnel, Packages and Vehicles); Detection Aids - Protected Area; Alarm Stations; and review of actions taken as a result of NRC Bulletins,

Circulars and Notice I Results: Development and implementation of the licensee's security program I

are progressing on a schedule consistent with the licensee's anticipated fuel load dat ) l

,

i 8706050192 870515 PDR ADOCK 05000412 l

'

G P DR ,,,.

,

_ .____ ._

-

i

'

i l'

'

. .

.

DETAILS Key Persons Contacted-W. Roy, Manager, Administrative Services, DLC H. Harper, Director of Security, DLC i

F. Lipchick, Licensing Supervisor, DLC D. Roman, Supervisor, Quality Assurance and Maintenance, DLC C. Sabol, Senior Quality Assurance Specialist, DLC A. Middleton, Jr., Security Assistant, DLC M. Johnston, Security Training / Procedures Coordinator, DLC W. Reimer, Startup Engineer, DLC D. White, Startup Engineer, DLC

! J. Belfiore, Quality Assurance Engineer, DLC P. Udon, Security Force Supervisor, Security Bureau, In j J. Gagliano, Security Startup Test Coordinator, Security Bureau, In . Security Plan Review i

The inspectors conducted a pre-implementation review of the licensee's security plan for Unit 1 and Unit 2 (combined) that was submitted to the

.

NRC for approval on February 19, 1987. That plan has not yet received I

approval. The inspectors identified several modifications that would be

necessary prior to plan approva J

, Dn April 10, 1987, the licensee transmitted to the NRC a revision to the sca rity plan that reflected the modifications identified by the inspec-tors, a change requested by the NRC-HQ plan reviewer, and a change made by the 'icense .

3. Physical Barriers (Protected Area)

During a tour of the protected area perimeter, the inspectors determined

>

that the barrier was installed in accordance with the description in the security pla Titt5 i e '

'

'

N;iT'33 SAFEGUARDS (NFORETEi AMD IS MT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE,lT15 INTEf010NAl LEFT BLAN J

\ The inspectors also reviewed the protected area barrier penetration study I conducted by the licensee. The inspectors reviewed site drawings, toured I the protected area perimeter and performed visual inspections of selected i

penetrations. During the review, a potentially vulnerable penetration was j identified. The licensee took immediate action to correct the proble I i

i i

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _

T

.

.

3 Assessment Aids During a review of the assessment system, the inspectors determined that it was adequate to perform its intended function, and that it was installed in accordance with the description in the security pla However, the inspectors identified one area of the perimeter where

. assessment could be impro/e The licensee stated that an evaluation

.

would be conducted and action would be taken, if found appropriate.

i

Access Control (Personnel)

i The inspectors reviewed the personnel access control program that will be

used to grant unescorted access to the Unit 2 protected area. The licen-see is conducting personrel screening in accordance with the program

identified in the NRC-approved Unit 1 Security Plan. This is essentially the same program contained in the Unit I and 2 combined plan. No discrep--

ancies were note ! Access Control (Packages and Vehicles)

The inspectors confirmed that equipment and procedures are in place for

,

the search of packages and the control of vehicles entering the protected

! area. The equipment and procedure were consistent with'the commitments j in the Unit 1 and 2 combined security plan.

1 Detection Aids (protected Area)

!

i At the request of the inspectors, the licensee performed selected tests

' on various segments of the perimeter intrusion detection systems. Each '

test was performed as required and was conducted in accordance with com-

,

mitments in the Unit I and 2 combined security plan and written security l procedure The results of all tests were satisfactory, Alarm Stations

The inspectors confirmed through observation of the Central Alarm Station (CAS) and the Secondary Alarm Station (SAS) that they were established in conformance with the Unit I and 2 combined security plan and were ade-quate and appropriate for their intended functions. CAS and SAS operators demonstrated adequate skill and knowledge in the performance of their i duties.

] NRC Bulletins, Circulars and Notices i

The NRC Bulletins, Circulars and Notices reviewed during this inspection i

are identified in Attachment 1 to this report. Those that will be

addressed during subsequent inspections are identified in Attachment 2.

i s'

J J

!

J

!

!.___..-_. . _ _ . - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- _-__ _ --____

.

.

.

10. Exit Interview The inspector met with the licensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the review on April 10, 1987. At that time the purpose and scope of the review were discussed and the findings were presente At no time during this review was written material provided the license i

-_ _ _ __

.

.

ATTACHMENT 1 The inspectors reviewed the licensee's disposition of the following previously issued NRC/I&E Information Bulletins, Circulars and Notices with licensee representatives to determine if they were considered during the development of the Beaver Valley Unit 2 security progra I&E Circular No. 77-04 - Inadequate Lock Assemblies l Tit!S PAtG.uw ;;0HTAINS SAFEGUARDS I INFDRMAT!00 AND IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE,lTiS INTENil0NALLY

. . LEFJ BLAN ; I&E Bulletin No. 77-08 - Assurance of Safety and Safeguards During An Emergency and I&E Information Notice Number 86-55 - Delayed Access to Safety-Related Areas and Equipment During Plant Emergencies THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS Sf3EGUARDS INFORMAI!0M raid IS HOT FOR JUBLIC DISCLOSURE,IT IS li'TENTIONALLY t

LEFT CLAN l I&E Circular No. 78-17 and 79-03 - Inadequate Guard Training / ,

Qualification and Falsified Training Records I The inspectors determined that the licensee had certified and maintained supporting documentation to adequately reflect the abilities of individ- l uals currently performing duties as guards, watchmen or armed response  !

personnel, Guards, watchmen and armed response personnel were tested l on a random basis by NRC to confirm and verify that the training being administered was applicable, thorough and consistent with the current NRC-approved training and qualification pla I&E Information Notice No. 82-05 - Increasing Frequency of Drug-Related Incidents The licensee stated that there was no history of drug-related cases at the site involving sale or use. Unit 1 experience has shown that plant employees have supported management in identifying and resolving other potential personnel problems, e.g., alcohol and family problems. The licensee intends to conduct searches of the work areas periodically with drug dog _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ._________ __ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _

_

.

I I

. Attachment 1 2 l

l I&E Information Notice No. 82-46 - Defective and Obsolete Combination Padlocks The inspectors conducted a random survey of Safeguards Information storage containers in the Primary Access Facility and observed that each container had the approved Sergeant and Greenleaf combination padlock (Model 8077A). I&E Information Notice No. 84-07 - Design Basis Threat and Review of Vehicular Access Controls Tills PARAGRAPH CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS INFORTMT!CN Mi0 IS HOT FOR PUBLIC OlSCLOSURE. IT IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLAN I&E Information Notice No. 85-04 - Inadequate Management of 1 Security Response Drills The inspectors determined that the licensee had no written security pro-cedures that outlined how security response drills would be conducte However, the inspectors did observe that the licenseo had a well organ-ized, preplanned set of response drill scenarios that had been used to test the capabilities of the response forc The licensee representatives stated that response drills are conducted with oversight from a senior contractor security supervisor and a proprietary security manage I&E Information Notice No. 85-28 - Partial loss of AC Power and Diesel Generator Degradation and No. 85-32 - Recent Engine Failures of Emergency Diesel Generators l

T!ilS PARmAPH C0f!TA!NS SAFEGUARDS INFORf8T03 M1D IS NOT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSUf:E, ITIS lilTENIl0NALLY LEFT BLANK.

-_____ _ -_____ -_____________-____- _ _ _________

- - . _ - _ . - _ . _ _ _

i .

.

.

l ATTACHMENT 2 i

I The following I&E Information Notices and Circular will be discussed during i future reviews of your security progra Number Date Title 1 l

79-16(N) 7-30-79 Vital Area Access Control 80-09(C) 4-28-80 Problems with Plant Internal Communi-cations Systems 82-07(N) 3-16-82 Inadequate Security Screening Programs 83-15(N) 3-23-83 Falsified Pre-Employment Screening Records 83-27(N) 5-4-83 Operational Response to Events Concerning Deliberate Acts Directed Against Plant Equipment 83-36(N) 6-9-83 Impact of Security Practices on Safe Operations 83-83(N) 12-19-83 Use of Portable Radio Transmitters Inside Nuclear Power Plants 85-79(N) 9-30-85 Inadequate Communications Between Maintenance, Operations, and Security Personnel 85-97(N) 12-26-85 Jail Term for Former Contractor Employee Who Intentionally Falsified Welding Inspection Records 86-27(N) 4-21-86 Access Control at Nuclear Facilities 86-55(N) 7-10-86 Delayed Access to Safety-Related Areas and Equipment During Plant Emergencies 86-83(N) 9-19-86 Underground Pathways into Protected Areas, Vital Areas 86-88(N) 10-15-86 Compensatory Measures for Prolonged Periods of Security System Failure 86-91(N) 11-3-86 Limiting Access Authorization 87-11(N) 2-13-87 Enclosure of Vital Equipment Within Designated Vital Areas