IR 05000334/1985023

Physical Security Insp Rept 50-334/85-23 on 851015-18.No Non Compliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Mgt Effectiveness, Security Organization & Security Program Audit.Portions with Held (Ref 10CFR73.21,9.5(a)(4) & 2.790)

ML20137G850
Person / Time
Site:	Beaver Valley
Issue date:	01/10/1986
From:	Dunlap J, Keimig R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To:
Shared Package
ML20137G847	List: IR 05000334/1985023 ML20137G841
References
50-334-85-23, NUDOCS 8601210278
Download: ML20137G850 (6)

Text

,

s

.

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION I

Report No.

50-334/85-23 Docket No.

50-334 License No. DPR-66 Licensee: Duquesne Light Company 435 Sixth Avenue Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15291 Facility Name:

Beaver Valley Power Station, Unit 1 Inspection At:

Shippingport, Pennsyvlanta Inspection Conducted:

October 15-18, 1985 Date of Last Physical Security Inspection: November 13-16, 1984 Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection Inspector:

JeI M/

///6//d ck M. Dunlap,'Fh'y icaV5Fecurity Inspector

/

dite Approved by:

.

.-

- f

/- /d - 84 R. R.

g, Ch Safeguards Section date Divisi of Ra tion Safety and Safeguards Inspection Summary: Routine, Unannounced Physical Security Inspection on October 15-18, 1985 (Report No. 50-334/85-23)

Areas Inspected: Management Effectiveness; Security Organization; Security Program Audit; Testing and Maintenance; Locks, Keys and Combinations; Physical Barriers (Protected and Vital Areas); Assessment Aids; Access Control (Personnel, Packages, and Vehicles); Detection Aids (Protected and Vital Areas); Alarm Stations; Communications; Personnel Training and Qualification; and Safeguards Contingency Plan.

The inspection involved 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br /> onsite by a region-based inspector.

Results:

The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspected.

8601210278 860113 ADOCK 0 % 334 DR p

.

I

.

.

DETAILS 1.

Persons Contacted

• J. D. Sieber, General Manager, Nuclear Services

• W. J. Roy, Manager Administrative Services

• D. J. Roman, QA Supervisor, Maintenance

• F. J. Lipchick, Senior Licensing Supervisor B. F. Sepelak, NSU Engineer

• J. H. Lukehart, Jr., Director of Security

• H. L. Harper, Security Assistant

• A. L. Middleton, Jr., Security Training Coordinator

• W. M.-Troskoski, Senior Resident Inspector, NRC A. A. Asars, Resident Inspector The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel and members of the Burns International contract guard force.

2.

MC 30703 - Exit Interview The inspector met with licensee representatives (indicated by asterisks in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on October 18, 1985, to review the purpose and scope of the inspection and to present the findings of the inspection.

At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector.

3.

MC 81020 - Management Effectiveness The inspector observed that there was close, daily interactions between the licensee's onsite security management staff and the contractor's supervisory staff.

The inspector also found that the new security build-ing is a good example of the planning, coordinating, and staffing of security projects being carried out by licensee management.

It contains a very well designed personnel processing facility and alarm station on the first floor, and excellent administrative offices and training facilities on the second floor.

4.

MC 81022 - Security Organization Licensee proprietary oversight of the contract security force conformed to the Physical Security Plan, Revision 5, effective August 28, 1984. The inspector confirmed through discussions with licensee security management personnel, a review of records, and observation of contractor operations that an adequate number of trained and qualified guards and watchpersons were assigned to and performing duties as prescribed by the security plan and implementing procedures.

}

.- -

. = -

-

.

.

.

_ - _

--

-

-

-

_

i

.

.

}

5.

MC 81034 - Security Program Audit i

The inspector reviewed the licensee's Annual Security Audit Report, BV-1-85-32 dated October 1, 1985. The audit was conducted by two auditors

'

from the Quality Asturance (QA) Department and the corporate Security Director from August 26, 1985 to September 17, 1985. The scope of the

'

audit included: (1) Access Control; (2) Locks, Keys, and Combinations; (3)

i Test and Maintenance; (4) Training and Qualification; (5) Response to Alarms; (6) Physical Barriers; (7) Security Force Duties; (8) Screening of

Contractor Personnel; and (9) Administrative Requirements Between Burns and DLC. One discrepancy involving the quarterly metal detector perfor-mance test was identified and was promptly corrected. Two observations were also made. The first concerned psychological testing and licensee

-

action is being delayed pending NRC's decision on rule making in this matter. The second concerned an administrative matter which the licensee considered as an improvement and had already implemented.

6.

MC 81042 - Testing and Maintenance The inspector reviewed testing and maintenance records and observed

,

testing of security equipment to ensure that it met NRC regulatory per-

<

formance requirements.

Records reflected that security related Priority A maintenance requests received prompt attention; however, some lessor priorities were almost a year old. The inspector could not identify any

of these that appeared to lessen the effectiveness of the security program. The licensee said that the number of maintenance technicians assigned to work on security related work requests had been reduced from

-

four to two to accommodate Unit 2 construction work and, for a period last summer, the two assigned to Unit 1 were attending school. The licensee representatives said that they were aware of the situation and that additional efforts are being made to complete the Unit 1 work order requests and shorten the time delay in completing future work order requests. This is an Inspector Followup Item (85-23-01).

!

7.

MC 81046 - Locks, Keys, and Combinations The inspector determined that locks, keys, and combinations were controlled and' protected in conformance with the physical security plan

,

'

and procedures. All protective and vital area keys were accounted for during an inventory observed by the inspector.

'

8.

MC 81052 - Physical Barriers (Protected Area)

'

The inspector observed that the physical barrier surrounding the protected area (PA) was maintained in accordance with the physical security plan and was adequate for its intended function. An NRC

.

Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER), conducted April 8-12, 1985, identified a concern with the protected area barrier.

!

-_.

. -

.

-. -. _ -

.-

- - -

-

_ -.

_- -

- - - -

m-a

.

THIS F APAr!' ' r " tit ' iP" 3.700(d)

1:. "- ' "i_P: b, ' i S I IfJ2 12:LIC T

.;t iS

'a 1: C..~~'.

La :

. '.

THIS r/2ACRAr:I ca:. tI;I3 ;3 733(d)

II.I'P; MII ce; s.a f r, ); 733 PUCI.I C D' ? ?" ". J ';. ; 1;;

I: :::r:Ic:.:.:: : w.: n: : c.

The inspector determined that the concern identified during the RER had been adequately corrected.

9.

MC 81054 - Physical Barriers (Vital Areas)

The inspector observed that the vital area (VA) barriers were adequate and appropriate for their intended use, except as noted by the RER Team.

The RER team identified two significant safeguards inadequacies during its review, as follows:

a.

.

3..w, ~,- - -

.. y..., _ _ r,. 9,. y

,

,'

-oa 13 :!1.

. ;

or.m

,

..,3,,~,

o p-

..

..i

-

i..

.m n.: ~ t s..I i w...

.t.

This inadequacy appears to have been corrected.

b.

TH!S P" T *t ?".T?itr "P rM'03 t ' i r.q ~ * * I

,I j.$

$161 v, 14

.

g r

e

_ 4. s.d g v.a.m....,

.. n. _, m...mI u-

..,

-

..

...

LEH GU.5X.

This is an Inspector Followup Item (85-23-02).

.

TP !S."/ "

.a.ic.9 p gr,199DS s-IMC r

, ~,, q,7 y ug D; E LG 3 H,li t D I U ii s u ',LLY LEfIDLMd.

This is an Inspector Followup Item (85-23-03).

10. MC 81066 - Assessment Aids Assessment aids utilized by the licensee were observed by the inspector from the central and secondary alarm stations during daylight hours.

They conformed to physical security plan requirements and were adequate for their intended function, when observed by the inspector.

11. MC 81070 - Access Control (Personnel)

The inspector observed that the licensee controlled access to the PA and VA in conformance with the physical security plan and implementing prccedures.

During the period from April 1, 1984 to September 30, 1985, four Security Event Reports, per 10 CFR 73.71, were submitted which concerned personnel access control. To prevent a reoccurrence of badge issue problems, all access control (badge issue) officers were given remedial training which included a review of post orders, security bulletins concerning badging, and badging procedures.. According to security management, badge issue personnel are tested at irregular intervals by having licensee management personnel intentionally request incorrect badge numbers. The inspector reviewed records of remedial training and observed the badge issuing process. The effectiveness of the licensee's actions to correct badge issuance problems will be reviewed during future inspections. This is an Inspector Followup Item (85-23-04).

12. MC 81072 - Access Control (Packages)

Access control of packages and material entering the PA was observed by the inspector and found to be in accordance with the physical security plan and implementing procedures.

13. MC 81074 - Access Control (Vehicles)

Search and control of vehicles entering or delivering material at the PA vehicle gate were observed by the inspector and found to be in accordance with the physical security plan and implementing procedures. However, the designated vehicle list at the vehicle gate was not up to date with the designated vehicle list in the central alarm station. This was corrected prior to completion of the inspection and will be reviewed during a sub-sequent inspection. This is an Inspector Followup Item (85-23-05).

.

6 14. MC 81078 - Detection Aids (Protected Area)

The perimeter intrusion detection system (IDS) detected inspector requested penetration tests of the PA in accordance with the physical security plan and implementing procedures.

15. MC 81080 - Detection Aids (Vital Areas)

The VA intrusion detection system detected inspector requested penetration tests of the VA in accordance with the physical security plan and implementing procedures.

16. MC 81084 - Alarm Stations The inspector confirmed by observation and interview of central alarm station (CAS) and secondary alarm station (SAS) operators that the CAS and SAS were in conformance with the physical security plan and implementing procedures and were adequate and appropriate for their intended functions.

17. MC 81088 - Communications The inspector observed tests of the internal and external communication links established by the licensee and determined that they were in con-formance with the physical security plan and implementing procedures.

18. MC 81501 - personnel Training and Qualification - General Requirements The inspector reviewed the licensee's Training and Qualification (T&Q)

Plan and the training and qualification records of 30 watchmen, 4 CAS/SAS operators, 7 response team members, and 5 access controllers. The results of the review indicated that the T&Q plan was being carried out in accordance with plan commitments and that training records were well

[

maintained and current.

19. MC 81601 - Security Contingency Plan The licensee's Security Contingency Plan was reviewed by the inspector.

Observation by the inspector of responses to actual and simulated con-tingencies during this inspection disclosed that the responses were consistent with responses detailed in the Security Contingency Plan.

Security personnel appeared to be appropriately familiar with their duties and carried them out in a professional manner.

!

.

-

-

-