ML20236N611

Change Notice 001 to Rev 5 to Procedure CPP-016, Safety Significance Evaluations of Deviation Repts

ML20236N611
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	04/28/1987
From:	Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20236N530	List: ML20236N533 ML20236N539 ML20236N544 ML20236N549 ML20236N552 ML20236N556 ML20236N563 ML20236N573 ML20236N579 ML20236N584 ML20236N593 ML20236N604 ML20236N611 ML20236N618 ML20236N619 ML20236N640 ML20236N648 ML20236N655 ML20236N660 ML20236N672 ML20236N684 ML20236N705 ML20236N718 ML20236N732 ML20236N743 ML20236N751 ML20236N766 ML20236N777 ML20236N785 ML20236N789 ML20236N796 ML20236N810 ML20236N816 ML20236N825 ML20236N841 ML20236N848 ML20236N854 ML20236N876 ML20236N887 ML20236N898 ML20236N903 ML20236N921 ML20236N934 ML20236N946 ML20236N966 ML20236N975 ML20236P008 ML20236P012 ML20236P033 ML20236P038 ... further results
References
CPP-016, CPP-16, NUDOCS 8708120029
Download: ML20236N611 (3)

Text

_ _ _ _

Page 1 of 3 v

EVALUATIdN RESEARCH CORPORATION

/~s

( )

'w/ .

UNCONTROLLED COPY.

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLAN l

CHANGE NOTICE: 001 l

1 PROCEDURE NO: CPP-016 l d

REVISION: 5 I ISSUE DATE: 04/28/87

/~

I L

SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS OF DEVIATION REPORTS The CPP identified above is hereby changed ss shown on the attached pages of this notice.

I Prepared by: , wat Date: /d#p- rd'7 Approved by: ~

Date: h- N-N7 On-Site QA R esentative Approved by: ,

bAmC/h Date: 4-/J7/i-QX/QC Revies Teati Leader

(

(

B7081D0029 870731 PDR ADOCK 05000445 A PDR

C/N-001 CPP-016 i

Rav. 5 Page 2 of 3

1. Revise paragraph 1.0 to read:

_.j This procedure establishes the method to perform evaluations of reported construction / manufacturing deviations to identify any construction / manufacturing deficiencies.

2. Revise paragraph 4.0 to read: l The QA/QC Safety Significance Evaluation Group (SSEG) evaluates construction / manufacturing deviations and, as required, out-of-scope observations (see references 3.1 and 3.2) to identify any construction / manufacturing deficiencies. The safety significance evaluations (SSEs) examine the performance of the "as constructed or as purchased" hardware in relationship to its intended or required performance as defined by the engineering requirements. Evaluations are thoroughly reviewed and approved by individuals knowledgeable in the applicable discipline (s). The QA/QC Review Team Leader (RTL) also reviews and approves evaluations with determination of construction / manufacturing deficiencies. All SSEs are distributed to ensure any further reinspection / reviews are identified, as required by Reference 3.3, and to ensure that the CPSES Project satisfactorily defines and implements action to correct any construction / manufacturing deficiencies in accordance with References 3.4 and 3.5.

3. Revise paragraph 4.1.2 to read:

yy

^j QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineers perform and document evaluations which determine whether the reported deviations are apparent construction / manufacturing deficiencies, i

4. Revise paragraph 4.1.5 to read:

The QA/QC Review Team Leader (RTL) reviews and approves SSEs with determinations of construction / manufacturing deficiencies, j

5. Add new paragraph *.4.3 as follows: )

4.4.3 Manufacturing Deficiency - Any identified manufacturing 1 deviation that has been determined to be safety l significant.

6. Revise paragraph 5.1, 3rd paragraph to read: )

Accordingly, the SSEG Supervisor shall obtain written confirmation j from the responsible individual of the other Review Team which l attests that procedures established to identify construction /manu- l facturing deficiencies meet the intent of this procedure. In the j absence of such confirmation, the SSEG Supervisor shall, as required, provide written direction to perform evaluations in accordance with thie procedure.  !

l t

Q)

-1

C/N-001 CPP-016 Rsv. 5 i Page 3 of 3

.' % . 7. . Revise. paragraph 5.2.2(f) to read:

t )

L/ Should:the inspected item be unable to perform its intended safety function, the reported condition is considered to be safety-significant and is identified as a construction /manufact-uring deficiency.

8. Revise paragraph 5.2.4, 3rd paragraph to read:

Construction / manufacturing deficiencies, identified by individual analyses of deviations, unclassified deviations, and deviations which resulted in indeterminate SSEs are not to be included-in the cumulative impact evaluation.

9. Revise paragraph 5.3.3, 3rd paragraph to read:

Evaluations that identify any construction / manufacturing deficiencies require further reviews and approvals in accordance with Paragraph 5.3.4.

10. Revise paragraph 5.4.1, 6th listing to read:

CPRT Program Director (Construction / Manufacturing Deficiencies Only)

11. Revise paragraph 5.6, 7th listing to read:

A CPRT Program Director (Construction / Manufacturing Deficiencies Only)

12. Revise Attachment 6.2, Item (4) to read:

(4) Signature of preparer, date and conclusive statement. (Circle "wil1~not" for non safety-significant evaluations and cross out "will." Circle "will" for construction / manufacturing deficiencies and. cross out "will not.") Should the conclusion be' indeterminate, enter "N/A Indeterminate" or similar notation.

13. Revise Attachment 6.2, Item (7) to read:

(7) QA/QC SSEG Supervisor signature and date Should the evaluation result in a construction / manufacturing deficiency, the approval of the QA/QC RTL is also required.

Otherwise, the SSEG Supervisor enters "NA" in the space provided for that approval. Accordingly, the QA/QC RTL indicates that the requirements of Section 5.3.4 have been met by entering: )

l

14. Revise Attachment 6.3, paragraph V.B. to read:

i B. Construction / Manufacturing deficiencies

1. State that the inspected item and the affected systems  ;

cannot perform their intended function with the existing deviation.

i l

C-____________ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _