ML20236N660
| ML20236N660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1987 |
| From: | Hansel J, Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236N530 | List:
|
| References | |
| CPP-020-02, CPP-20-2, NUDOCS 8708120053 | |
| Download: ML20236N660 (7) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:n.
- i. f Pace 1 of 5 73
' '~ EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION ] - q ^ 7 7,[ ~ p. y, p' 7 p a m f q 2. COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR OA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC PLANS PROCEDURE NO: CPP-020 REVISION: 3 ISSUE DATE: 01-16-87 .,/n t CUT-OF-SCOPE OBSERVATIONS /!/h!87 PREPARED BY: M DATE: APPROVED BY: DATE: /-/ 6-87 ON-SITE g REPRESENTATIVE I!/((7 ,f-APPROVED BY: [ DATE: QA " REVIEW TEAM LEADER / / G708120053 870731 ADDCK0500g5 PDR A
CPP-020 Ravision 3 +y 1.0 PURPOSE .ry k._ I This procedure describes the method of reporting and processing }. observations by Review Team personnel which are outside~the scope of the CPRT Issue-Specific Action Plans (ISAP). 2.0 -APPLICABILITY This procedure is app!tcable to the documentation and/or construction of hardwa'.e at Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Unit 1, 2, and areas common to both units.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 CP-QP 16.3, " Processing CPRT Deviation Peports/ Observation Notices." 3.2 CPP-016, " Safety Significance Evaluations of Deviation Reports." 3.3 CPP-014, " Collective Evaluation of Construction QA/QC Program l
- and Quality of Construction."
4.0 GENERAL / J Any apparent out-of-scope observations are reported by QA/QC Review . '~' Team personnel to the CPSES QC Coordinator. Furthermore, the QA/QC Review Team ensures that reported out-of-scope observations are reviewed and, as required, evaluated for safety significance. Finully, out-of-scope observations are reviewed to determine their effect on the quality of construction and adequacy of QA/QC at the CPSES. 4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 QA/QC Review Team Personnel Review Team personnel report out-of-scope observations by memorandum whenever they are discovered. 4.1.2 Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer The Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer processes out-of-scope observations in accordance with this procedure. 4.1.3 QA/QC Engineering Supervisor The QA/QC Engineering Supervisor forwards any out-of-scope observations received from the Hardware [~'T : Collective Evaluation Engineer to the appropriate QA/QC \\s-) Discipline Engineers. 2
CPP-020 Revision 3 -s 4.1.4 QA/QC Discipline Engineer QA/QC Discipline Engineers review out-of-scope observations forwarded by the QA/QC Engineering Supervisor to determine whether or not further review by the Safety Significance Evaluation Group (SSEG) is required and their effect on the quality of construction and adequacy of QA/QC at CPSES. 4.1.5 QA/0C Safety SSEG Supercisor The QA/QC SSEG Supervisor ensures that out-of-scope I observations forwarded by QA/QC Discipline Engineers l are evaluated to identify any construction I deficiencies. l 4.1.6 Collective Evaluation Engineers Collective Evaluation Engineers consider out-of-scope observations in identifying adverse trends. 4.1.7 OA/QC Records Administrator The QA/QC Records Administrator retains out-of-scope observations in accordance with this procedure. 4.2 Policy O Peview Tear personnel should note apparent defects and discrepancies that are not applicable to the specific area or item being reinspected / reviewed. 4.3 Definition 4.3.1 Out-of-Scope Observation An app'arent defect or discrepancy which is outside the scope of any CPRT ISAP, or relates to an action plan population but is not part of the randomly selected sample. 5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Initiation 5.1.1 Should any QA/QC Review Team personnel observe an l apparent defect or discrepancy which is out-of-scope, they prepare a memorandum in accordance with Attachment 6.1 or 6.2 as applicable. This memorandum shall be addressed to the CPSES QC Coordinator and include, as applicable, the: O 3
9 CPP-020 Revision 3 s ,s Date. i ) \\. / Condition observed. Equipment / component identification including the mark or tag number. Applicable drawing number including revision designation. System description / code. Location including elevation, reference to column lines, building, and room number. Document package identification and vault location. 5.1.2 After signing the memorandum, the origit.ator forwards it to the Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer. 5.1.3 The Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer assigns a serial number, then forwards the original and a copy to the CPSES QC Coordinator for further processing in accordance with Reference 3.1. The Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer also forwards copies to QA/QC /T Engineering Supervisor for further distribution in (,) accordance Section 5.2 and to the QA/QC Records Administrator for retention in accordance with Section 5.4. 5.2 Review The QA/QC Engineering Supervisor provides the QA/QC Discipline Engineers with copies of the out-of-scope observations received from.the Hardware Collective Engineer which are related to their population. Discipline engineers review each observation to determine whether it requires further evaluation by the SSEG and its impact, if any, on the associated population. Should the observation report a i condition that is not in accordance with a requirement defined I in the applicable Quality Instruction and be potentially safety-significant, it is referred to the SSEG Supervisor. Reviews are documented on memorandums addressed to " File" which note all of the observations reviewed, specifically identifies those requiring further review in accordance with Reference 3.2, and states clearly their impact relative to the associated population. A copy of each memorandum signed by the QA/QC Discipline Engineer and appropriate QA/QC Lead Discipline and SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer, is forwarded to the QA/QC Records Administrator for distribution and control s ( ) in accordance with Section 5.4. V 4 i J
4 j CPP-020 Revision 3 5.3 Collective Evaluation 5.3.1 During the Collective Evaluation, the Collective Evaluation Engineers consider ot.t-of-scope observations in identifying any adverse trends not previously reported. After discussing any adverse trends resulting from out-of-scope observations with the responsible Issue Coordinator (s), the Collective Evaluation Engineers ensure that any identified adverse trends are combined with those identified previously. l then collectively evaluated to determine the quality of construction and adequacy of QA/QC in accordance with Reference 3.3. 5.4 Distribution and Control The QA/QC Records Administrator maintains the file (marked XXX.7D) of any out-of-scope observations forwarded from the Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer and memorandums from the QA/QC Discipline Engineers. 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 Sample memorandum reporting hardware out-of-scope observation. G 6.2 Sample memorandum reporting documentation out-of-scope observation. O 5
e.1 CPP-020 Revision: 3 Page 1 of I SAMPLE MEMORANDUM REPORTING HARDWARE OUT-OF-SCOPE OBSERVATION Brown & Root,Ince mw w P O. 60s Icel CLIN ROS8 78KA8 74443 Tol ('. P.5 E 6 ((C C c o E D e w A To R 1 ( l) oarl g g g. g o. 4 5 g, 4 5) ConDmca e 3s elviD '. I r z. 3_ g g /(t) 9 ~ l} kEw6PecTicW Qvday o U T - c F - 6 ccPd 086ERVA7 cs EACH hA56 fLATE CcN T4,w PAcKAG.E # .L 6-P54 E-c6 4 GRour koLE5 AND No t c.. WGR w AF-I- 0 3 9-c 29-5 3 3 A A6 6TATED oW "DE616-N / A 6 - 5. - O ' S 'o + ** <^ .,4 e o, us,1 1 32.,. ~,.. Le c Av.ea : 30 ' c" we$r og cot. L,ae z; we PAppte 47 (3) 14'-i" Seur e/ AL.oue [3) EA T END OF %E 7Ti.s Roos Wo. 74 d '5 Is la cosnct w T. sc ELEVATE c4 ; 8o 5 '4 D A R 6 b c x E.T Si D E. hWG.
- A P- \\ - 035-029-6 $5 R SEV.i 43ssem - %F' sy OM
$1GNED M.65..N.&.6!,!MS h(4) .,..n.... .........~. n.. ~................. Notes: (1), (2), (3) & (4) Are completed by QA/QC Review Team personnel reporting out-of-scope observations. (5) Is assigned by Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer. l
4.2 CPP-020 Revision: 3 Page l'of 1 SAMPLE MEMORANDUM REPORTING DOCUMENTATION i OUT-OF-SCOPE OBSERVATION 4 Brown & Root,Inc. P O So1 tool CLIN toSI. ftX AS 76463 3- -MESSAG;E 83 N P t Y
- 1 Toi c Psec qc coezpawarocL-{i) aan FcR. c r 03s LisTe u
.gs g.,q e. 68 6 ---(s) _J 3o 3AN 83 PeR CAL. LA.; ,L, ~ Jz) caft 3-5-AS b u'D 6E 3e Juss 33 A GR. o VT-oF - 6 cop 6 o86sEFATioa Pk G
- CC - I-EC -co7-o 13 -3 (3y l.oCATsp I4
~i'uG c o VA ULT pumas. Docum eurAT,o a O 1 J View, FoLWwisc. cospir,oss we.gz
- c 65 E R.V6D
' f) N6PEcTor FAttsp To DArg his ENT,y CN TkE. M AT<IR.1 AL IDEN-k TS, c.A % cN bog. (M IL) FCR. T4 %23 c6 AND CLAMF
- 2) 64USGER.
IrJGTALLA nod CWc.k LI 6" WA T4 CAL..DuE.DATd h IM" MNY...'.bf.T. C4NG ' SIGNED ay 1 N Notes: (1), (2). (3) & (4) Are completed by QA/QC Review Team personnel reporting out-of-scope observations. (5) Is assigned by Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer. a}}