ML20236N640
| ML20236N640 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 03/05/1987 |
| From: | Hansel J, Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236N530 | List:
|
| References | |
| CPP-016-03, CPP-16-3, NUDOCS 8708120043 | |
| Download: ML20236N640 (20) | |
Text
. - _ - _ - - - -
Page 1 of 12 4
,e~s (j EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION UNCONTROLLED COPY COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR ALL QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS PROCEDURE NO: CPP-016 REVISION: 5 ISSUE DATE: 03-05-87
[ s LJ SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS OF DEVIATION REPORTS PREPARED BY: ( .
J ATE: 3,/3,[O7 APPROVED BY:
DATE: ~h ON-SITEQARpESENTATIVE
, .s i
APPROVED BY: a DATE: 3!9 !#M7
( QfgC'REVIEl' TEAM LEADER /
E708120043 070731 PDR ADOCK 05000445 A PDR
CPP-016 4
Revicion 5 1.0. PURPOSE L M'N_/ .
This procedure establishes the method to perform evaluations-of reported' construction deviatic.s to identify any construction deficiencies.
I 2.0 -APPLICABILITY l
This' procedure is applicable to purchased safety-related equipment and material as well as safety-related hardware constructed and QC accepted at Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES), Unit 1, 2, and a:eas common to both units that have been subjected to l ,
reinspection and/or documentation review as part of the Quality of i Construction Program.
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 CPP-010, " Preparation of Deviation Reports."
l 3.2 CPP-020 "Out-of-Scope Observations."
3.3 CPP-Oll, " Evaluations of. Adverse Trend Analyses, Construction Deficiencies, and QA/QC Program Deficiencies."
f- -
3.4 CP-QP 16.3, " Processing CPRT Deviation Reports / Observation
. Notices."
3.5 CPP-021, "CPSES Project Corrective Action."
3.6 CPP-004, "Proj ect Working Piles."
3.7 CPP-008, " Preparation of Verification Packages."
4.0 GENERAL The QA/QC Safety Significance Evaluation Croup (SSEG) evaluates construction deviations and, as required, out-of-scope observations (see References 3.1 and 3.2) to identify any construction-deficiencies. The safety significance evaluations (SSEs) examine the performance of the "as constructed" hardware in relationship to its intended or required performance as defined by the engineering requirements. Evaluations are thoroughly reviewed and approved by individuals knowledgeable in the applicable discipline (s). The QA/QC Review Team Leader (RTL) also reviews and approves evaluations with determinations of construction deficiencies. All SSEs are distributed to ensure any further reinspection / reviews are identified, as required by Reference 3.3, and to ensure that the CPSES Project satisfactorily defines and implements action to correct any construction deficiencies in accordance with References 1 t
t 3.4 and 3.5.
2
CPP-016 Revision 5 4.1 Responsibilities s
4.1.1 QA/QC SSEG Supervisor The QA/QC SSEG Supervisor ensures that any deviations, out-of-scope observations, and/or concerns received for evaluation are logged and processed in a timely manner.
The Supervisor ensures that knowledgeable personnel perform evaluations in accordance with established procedures and approves each SSE.
4.1.2 QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineer QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineers perform and document evaluations which determine whether the reported deviations are apparent construction deficiencies.
4.1.3 Checker A checker examines any calculations prepared and made part of the SSE.
4.1.4 QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineers review SSEs to ensure that they are performed in accordance with
['~Ng technically acceptable methods.
V 4.1.5 QA/QC Review Team Leader The QA/QC Review Team Leader (RTL) reviews and approves SSEs with determinations of construction deficiencies.
4.1.6 QA/QC Records Administrator The QA/QC-Records Administrator advises the QA/QC Coordinating Engineer of the status of approved evaluations and ensures their distribution. The QA/QC Records Administrator also maintains the file of SSEs, their associated memorandums, and marks SSEs as required.
4.2 Policy Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the latest Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) Program Plan and Issue-Specific Action Plans.
Should an activity,be designated as the responsibility of a Lecd Discipline Engineer, or higher, it may be delegated by that engineer to an individual under his or her supervision. t
/~'N L> l
\
3 L__._..___.. I
CPP-016 Revision 5 4.3 Conflicts-
- f i
s_,/ In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.
4.4 Definitions 4.4.1 Construction Deficiency - Any identified construction l-deviation that has been determined to be safety-significant.
4.4.2 Safety-Significant - An identified discrepancy which, if uncorrected, would result in the loss of capability of the affected system, structure, or compenent to perform its intended safety function. Credit is not allowed for redundancy at the component, system, train or structure level.
5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Deviation Report Receipt and Assignment Upon receipt of a valid DR, an out-of-scope observation or a concern from a Review Team other than the QA/QC Review Team, the QA/QC SSEG Supervisor ensures that it is logged in n- accordance with Attachmeat 6.1, then forwarded to the
. ( ,) appropriate personnel for evaluation.
The SSEG Supervisor forwards deviations, out-of-scope observations, or concerns to the appropriate QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer for evaluation. However, when the reported condition appears to be in an area under evaluation by a Review Team other than the QA/QC Review Team, the Supervisor may, with the concurrence of the appropriate Review Team Leader and the QA/QC Review Team Leader, reassign it to that Review Team for safety significance evaluation.
Accordingly, the SSEG Supervisor shall obtain written confirmation from the responsible individual of the other Review Team which attests that procedures established to identify construction deficiencies meet the intent of this procedure. 'In the absence of such confirmation, the SSEG Supervisor shall, as required, provide written direction to perform evaluations in accordance with this procedure.
l
_ . _ _ _ _ . -___-___-_A
CPP-016 Revision 5 5.2 Safety Significance Evaluations p
'y_f 5.2.1 QA/QC SSEG Lead Liscipline Engineers ensure that sufficient information relative to the reported condition is available for an analysis of safety significance. Should additional information be necessary, the Lead ensures that a memorandum is prepared to the appropriate individual to obtain the information. The Lead assigns DRs to QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineers for evaluation.
5.2.2 The SSEG Discipline Engineers perform an evaluation of the reported condition based upon the following guidelines:
(a) The Discipline Engineer beccmes familiar with the physica) arrangement of the referenced item to perform the evaluation with the proper perspective.
This may be accomplished by reviewing the Verification Package, project documents, and/or performing a plant inspection.
(b) The intended safety function of the referenced item is determined. The description of the intended safety function is determined by its performance in the specific application.
O) i
' ' ' (c) The manner in which the characteristics of the reported condition contributes to the likely performance of the intepJed safety function of the referenced item is deterained. Licensing regulations, licensing commitments, and engineering documents which substantiate this determination are referenced as required.
(d) The required level of performance to meet the intended safety function of the item is identified by reference to plant design documents.
(e) The likely performance of the referenced item considering its deviating attribute is determined either quantitatively or qualitatively. Project calculations or other calculations prepsred by the SSEG may be referenced. Should an SSEG calculation longer than a simple formula be used in the determination, a separate calculation sheet shall be prepared in accordance with Attachment 6.4. The calculation shall include as applicable:
A concise statement of the problem or question, i.e., the objective.
[)J Clear identification of any assumption (s).
L 5
CPP-016-Revision 5 9'
.A reference or description of the
- f,g~'g n method used in the analysis.
Clear identification of inputs which include, as applicabi.e, the technical.
document _ title, number, issue date, revision designation, and section, page, or table numbers, or incoming letter identification number, date, originator's.
name, addressee's name, file location, Land originator's source (when available') ..
References to applicable codes, standards, etc., including issue and addenda information.
A conclusive statement relative-to the objective'of the calculation i.e., the results which specify whether or not the reported condicion violates any code requirements.
Clear identification of any computer programs used.
NOTE: Calculations utilizing programmable calculators or O,' . desk top computers shall include the program listing.
(f) Should the-inspected item be unable to perform its intended safety function, the reported condition is considered to be safety-significant and is identified as a construction deficiency.
5.2.3 QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineers document evaluations of deviations, out-of-scope observations, and/or concerns in accordance with Attachments 6.2 and 6.3.
' Separate calculations originated by the SSEG and used as a part of the evaluation shall be as shown on Attachment 6.4. Separate calculations are required for all evaluations except for simple equations which fit into the text.
Attachments to the evaluations shall be labeled, e.g.,
1, 2, 3, etc., and referenced in the evaluation. SSEG calculations shall be numbered with the evaluation number and shall also have its attachments labeled, but differently from its evaluation, e.g., A, B, C, etc.
The calculation with its own attachments shall be
/ referenced in the evaluation, but not given another
\s. attachment number.
6
1
.e CpF-016 Revision 5 Evaluations, including SSEG prepared calculations, fs shall be prepared in ink or, if reproduced, shall have
( ink signatures.
Calculations prepared by the SSEG shall be checked by a technically competent engineer other than the preparer.
The checker shall sign and date both the calculation cover sheet and the SSE evaluation sheet. The SSE reviewer may also perform the checker function. Should the SSE reviewer perform the checker function, he or she shall: sign the SSE evaluation sheet in the space-designated " CHECKER" in addition to signing the space designated " REVIEWED BY," or; denote "N/A" to indicate "not applicable" in the " CHECKER" portion and sign the " REVIEWED BY" portion.
The QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer may elect to ;
obtain concurrence in the evaluation by a specialist or, QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineer in a related discipline. i Accordingly, the responsible individual (s) initial and !
I date the SSE in the " CHECKER" and/or "1EVIEWED BY" portions of the form.
When the SSEG Discipline Engineer does not prepare a calculation and it is' inappropriate to obtain the concurrence of a specialist or other QA/QC SSEG f~') Discipline Engineer, the preparer marks "N/A" (not
\- / applicable) in the " Checker" portion of the form, then forwards it to the appropriate QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer for review.
5.2.4 Cumulative impact evaluations are performed when multiple deviations pertaining to the same reinspected item are reported. The purpose of this evaluation is first to ensure that the item inspected can perform its intended function and second to identify combinations
~
of attributes which could result in adverse trends.
Cumulative impact evaluations shall be identified by the denoting "CI" in lieu of "DR" in the evaluation number. For example, "I-S-SBPS-XXX-CI-SSE."
Evaluations shall be made of all inspection and document attribure deviations on the same sample item to identify ar2 analyze all deviating conditions which interact to reduce the item's performance.
Construction deficiencies identified by individual analyses of deviations, unclassified deviations, and deviations which resulted in indeterminate SSEs are not to be included in the cumulative impact evaluation.
l
-\s- D) 7 L__ - _ _ _
CPP-016 Revision 5
<s The format for cumulative impacts shall, as a minimum, L ( ,) identify and provide a brief description of the
~ _ applicable DRs and provide sufficient analysis and l discussion to support the conclusions concerning independence and/or inter-relationships on the item's performance. Documents necessary for the conclusion shall be attached to the CI if not furnished in the individual SSE.
Frior ta the SRT's approval of the applicable Results Report or.its appendices, the responsible SSEG Lead'
(. Discipline Engineer is responsible for the preparation of a remorandum to ensure that ecch reported deviation pertaining to that population has been cumulatively evaluated as required.
The memorandum shall list eacn DR and indicate its current status. The responsible SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer and the SSEG Supervisor sign the memorandum, then forward it to the QA/QC Records Administrator for control.
5.2.5 Deviations, out-of-scope observations and/or concerns may b;. processed by the SSEG without reaching l conclusions concerning the hardware's ability to
-perform its intended function.
k'd- 5.2.5.1 Missing information - Insufficient information with respect to the ability.of the hardware to perform its installed safety function, e.g., document review deviation reports discursing missing documents or missing notacions on documents.
The SSE shall state that no conclusion can be
. reached concerning'the ability of the hardware to perform its intended function with respect to the attribute in question.
NOTE: Each indeterminate SSE requires the preparation of a memorandum similar to Attachment 6.5.
5.2.5.2 Deviation types covered by corrective action programs - Hardware performance evaluation is not required for deviation types already addressed by a TUGCO corrective action program.
O V
8
p CPP-016 Revision 5 i, l
/~'
The SSE form (Attachment 6.2) shall be used to document the' existence of a TUGC0
\s_)i corrective action program, or document that the deviation type is satisfactorily j included in she Results Report or its i appendices as approved by the SRT. Documents which indicate that the deviation type i is satisfactorily included in the corrective L action program or Results Report shall be attached to the SSE form.
The responsible Population Engineer shall co-sign the SSE form with the SSE engineer in the preparer block and the Lead Population Engineer shall co-sign with the SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer in the reviewer block.
5.3 Review and Approval Technically competent individuals other than the preparer review and approve all evaluations before the results or conclusions provide. input to or confirm other engineering decisions. Moreover, the QA/QC RTL approves the determination of a construction deficiency.
5.3.1 Checker
( A technically competent engineer, cther than the preparer, checks calculations prepared by the SSEG during the evaluation for accuracy and correct use of methodology. Checkers indicate their concurrence by signing and dating them in the appropriate space on the SSE and on the calculation cover sheet form (Attachment 6.4).
5.3.2 QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer The QA/QC SSEG Lead Discipline Engineer, knowledgeable in the applicable discipline, ensures that each SSE is complece, accurate, and otherwise consistent with the requirements of this procedure. Furthermore, he or she ensures that the reported condition has been analyzed in a mannur consistent with other similar deviations, out-of-scope observations, and/or concerns. Finally, the Lead ensures that an individual competent in the calculation discipline can understand the original work q without recourse to the preparer. l 5.3.3 QA/QC SSEG Supervisor The QA/QC SSEG Supervisor, reviews the SSE to ensure '
that the method, any assumptions used, and the results
(.) of the evaluation are appropriate.
1 9
-__-__-_u------
CPP-016 Revision 5 Evaluations determined not to be safety-significant are l 6 approved by tse QA/QC SSEG Supervisor and sent to the Records Administrator for distribution and control.
i Evaluations that identify any construction deficiencies require further reviews and approvals in l accordance with Paragraph 5.3.4.
5.3.4 QA/QC Revieu Team Leader The QA/QC RTL reviews safety significant SSEs, as required, to ensure that the reported condition does not overlap a concern being investigated by another organization, e.g., another CPRT Review *eem.
Should the review ty the QA/QC RTL reveal that the repsrted condition is currently under investigation by another CPRT Review Team, it shall be documented on a i
memorandum prepared by the QA/QC RTL and addressed to
" File." The memorandum shall provide instructions regarding the disposition of any affected DRs and indicate the concurrence of either the preparer /
reviewer (s)/spprover(s) of the referenced SSE, or the individuals acting in those capacities should the original signatories be no longer assigned to the CPRT.
The affected SSE is also marked "PREVIOUSLY REPORTED.
Refer to (RTL)'s memorandum dated (Date) attached" in h the space provided for the signature approval of the QA/QC RTL.
The QA/QC RTL ensures that approved safety significant SSEs and those marked "PREVIOUSLY REPORTED...." (with the required memorandum) are forwarded to the SSEG Superviser for transmittal to the QA/QC Records Administrator for distribution and control.
5.4 Distribution and Control 5.4.1 Records Administrator Upon the receipt of SSEs from the QA/QC SSEG Supervisor, the QA/QC Records Administrator advises the QA/QC Coordinating Engineer and documents their transmittal on uniquely numbered memorandums which include provision for the CPSES QC Coordinator to acknowledge receipt. In addition, the QA/QC Records Administrator maintains records to ensure that the CPSES QC Coordinator is in receipt of all valid SSEs, e.g., a file of transmittals forwarded to and received from the CPSES QC Coordinator. Copies, without attachments, are also sent to:
9 10
CPP-016 Revision 5 QA/QC Engineering Supervisor or Responsible
..j- Issue Coordinator V J QA/QC Inspection Supervisor QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineer The DAP RTL RTL'other than the QA/QC RTL (Refer to Section 5.1)
CPRT Program Director (Construction Deficiencies Only)
Copies sent to the CPSES QC Coordinator are evaluated by TUCCO for deportability in accordance with Reference 3.3.
I The Records Administrator maintains the file of I distributed SSEs and associated memorandums. l i
NOTE: Superseded SSEs shall be clearly marked
" SUPERSEDED. Refer to (SSE Number) Dated (Date)." Cancelled SSEs shall be clearly.
marked " CANCELLED. Refer to (Name)'s memo ;
, dated (Date)." 1 4
5.5 Revision Should it be necessary to make a change to a SSE that would alter its result or make major changes in the analysis such that much of the original evaluation must be re-written, the cognizant individual. prepares a new SSE which includes the appropriate change (s), is' identified to include, as applicable, the new DR hamber.and clearly denotes " SUPERSEDES (SSE Number) Dated (Date)."
In addition, the cognizant individual prepares a memorandum l which is addressed to " File" and provides a reasonable )
explanation regarding the change. The memorandum notes the '
superseded and superseding SSE numbers. The memorandum, with the new SSE attached, is routed for review. The new SSE is reviewed, approved, distributed, and controlled in the same manner as the one it supersedes. l l
Minor changes in the evaluation or the associated calculations shall be considered a revision. The changes shall be identified by a line in the margin and the revision number in a triangle beside it. The calculation signature sheet shall be signed in the appropriate revision blocks. The SSE cover sheet shall be initia11ed, dated, and identified for the 4
e appropriate revision. The SSE number shall contain the i
\
revision number. For example, "I-S-SBPS-XXX-DRXX-SSE l (Rev. 1)." -
I 11
CPP-016 Revision 5
, Otherwise, the-cognizant individual shall make any' innocuous L ,
changes to SSEs in accordance with Reference'3.5 and ensure
\ that any previous recipients of the SSE are advised of its-current status by distribution of the revised SSE.
5.6 Cancellation l
Should there be documented evidence that, in effect, cancels'a previously issued SSE, e.g., a memorandum that cancels a DR-(see Reference 3.1), the. cognizant individual ensures that the recipients of those SSEs are advised by memorandum of their correct status. The memorandum is addressed to " Distribution" and provides a reasonable explanation.regarding the cancellation and is routed for review and approval to the same organizations / disciplines that performed the previous review and approval. Copies of all memorandums, as noted for distribution, are sent to the:
CPSES QC Coordinator QA/QC Engineering Supervisor or Responsible Issue Coordinator QA/QC Inspection Supervisor f"' QA/QC Lead Discipline Engineer N~lg -
DAP RTL RTL other than the QA/QC RTL'(Refer to Section 5.1)
CPRT Program Director (Construction Deficiencies Only)
QA/QC Records Administrator 6.0 ATTACKHENTS 6.1 Safety Significance Evaluation Log Instruction 6.2 Safety Significance Evaluation Form (Sample and Instruction) 6.3 Format for Analysis Section of SSE 6.4 Calculation Title Page (Sample) 6.5 Memorandum of Indeterminate Evaluation l
f 12 6
Attachment 6.1-
- 4-CPP-016 Revision: 5 Page 1 of'.1 SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE' EVALUATION LOG INSTRUCTION
~
The SSEG shall maintain a record of all deviations, out-of-scope observations, and/or concerns received.by the SSEG'for' evaluation.
The QA/QC SSEG Supervisor ensures that_ valid DRs'are logged by entering the:
- Log number. -For example, the applicable Deviation Report number.
Date the reported condition was received. (not applicable to CIs).
Date the approved SSE was sent to the QA/QC. Records Administrator for distribution in accordance with Section 5.4..
Notation'to indicate those cases where deviations, etc., are transferred or returned from the SGEG and the reason (s).
Notation to' indicate the change in status of deviations, etc.,
received or SSEs issued such as invalidation, cancellation, revision, superceded, etc.
O
Attachmsnt 6.2
.. CPP-016 Revision: 4 Page 1 of 3 f)
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION I
COMANCHE ?EAK RESPONSE TEAM SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION EVALUATION N'JMBER: (1) SSE SBEET 1 0F (2)
PREPARER: (4) 'DATE: (4)
QA/QC SSEC DISCIPLINE ENGINEER CHECKER: (5) DATE: (5)
THE FOLLOWING ANALYSIS SUPPORTS THE CONCLUSION CONCERNING THE SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CONDITION DESCRIBED IN THE DEVIATION REPORT (S).
ANALYSIS:
o (3) i 7 ,
h CONCLUSION: (4)
BASED UPON THIS ANALYSIS. THE REPORTED CONDITION WILL/WILL NOT RESULT IN THE INABILITY OF ThE AFFECTED ITDt TO PERFORM ITS INTENDEE SAFETY RELATED ITNCTION.
I REVIEWED BY: -( 6) DATE: (6)
QA/QC SSEC LEAD DISCIPLINE ENGINEER l
APPROVED BY: (7) DATE: (7)
QA/QC SSEG SUPERVISOR APPROVED BY: (8) DATE: (8)
QA/QC REVIEW TEAM LEADER O
( CPP-016.2A, Revision 2
- _ _ _ - . .--. l
Attachment 6.2 l CPP-016 l
Revision: 4 l
SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION
(')s L.
COMANCHE PEAX RESPONSE TEAM SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION EVALUATION CCBER (t) SSE SHEET (2) 0F (2) i l
l (3) 9
\ !
CPP-016.25. Revision 1 0
2
L ., \
.i
( Attachment 6.2 j CPP-016 Revision: 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO COMPLETE p
f, FORMS CPP-016.2A and CPP-016.2B i
" SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION"
(
(1) The evaluation number consistent with the DR number or the Out-of-Scope Observation number. For example:
1-S-SBPS-001-DR1 SSE '
- DR Number - Preprinted (" Safety Significant Evaluation")
0- S-SBPS *001 SSE i
l - Preprinted (" Safety Significance 1 Evalu:. tion. ") .)1
- Out-of-Scope Observation Memo Serial Number
- Applicable Discipline and Population Designation per !
Reference 3.7 i
- Indicates "Out-of-Scope Observation" (2) Page number information excluding attachments.
(3) The analysis.
(
k (4) Signature of preparer, date and conclusive statement. (Circle "will not" for non safety-significant evaluations and cross out "will."
Circle "will" for construction deficiencies and cross out "will not.") Should the conclusion be indeterminate, enter "N/A.
Indeterminate" or similar notation.
(5) Signature of checker and date. If a checker or a specialist is unnecessary,' enter "N/A" (not applicable) in the appropriate spaces.
(6) QA/QC SSEG Lead Qiscipline signature and date.
NOTE: The same space may also be used to indicate the concurrence of an appropriate specialist or QA/QC SSEG Discipline Engineer. (Refer : Section 5.2.3.)
Upon the completion of a satisfactory review, the Supervisor indicates that the requirements in Section 5.3.3 have been met by entering the:
(7) QA/QC SSEG Supervisor signature and date.
Should the evaluation result in a construction deficiency, the approval of the QA/QC RTL is also required. Otherwise, the SSEG Supervisor enters "N/A" in the space provided for that approval. Accordingly, the QA/QC RTL indicates that the requirements of fection 5.3.4 have been met by entering:
(O)
(8) QA/QC RTL signature and date. -
3
4 Attachment 6.3
[ CPP-016 l Revision: 4 Page 1 of 2
.W
&) SAMPLE FORMAT FOR ANALYSIS SECTION OF SSE l
ANALYSIS:
l I. Description of Inspected Item and Deviation <
1-A. State the name of the item inspected and give its ID.
B. Describe each deviation occurrence listed on the Deviation
, Report. The description should be brief and relate to the discrepancy of'the item inspected.
II. Function of. Inspected Item Describe briefly the function (s) of the inspected item for the specific application. For items which perform indirect functions with respect to plant and public safety, the direct function of the affected system, component or structure may be described if necessary to support the conclusion.
III. Evaluation Objective Describe briefly the performance parameter (s) of the inspected
\
item that must be. evaluated to determine the effect of the deviation on the item's ability to perform its function (s).
Also describe any non-functional attributes, e.g., separation, that relate to plant or public safety, are affected by the deviation, and will be evaluated.
IV. Evaluation A. Develop the facts into a logical assessment of the item's performance.
B. Reference attachment calculations. Simple calculations can be included in text provided a calculation check is performed.
C. Compare the item's performance to acceptance criteria such as code stress allowables.
D. Provide the necessary references for equations, theory, and data.
E. Provide, as attachments, any information necessary to support the analysis.
l~ ,,.
Attachment'6.3-CPP-016 Revision: 4 F. If readily'quantifiable, indicate the impact on all.
f affected design margins.
.%l G. Indicate when code allowables have not been met and I
provide justification if'the' item is still acceptable.
'V. Conclusion-A. Non-safety-significant deviations.
- 1. State that the inspected item can still perform its-intended function with'the existing deviation.
B. Construction deficiencies.
- 1. . State that the inspected item and the affected systems' cannot' perform their intended function with the.
existing deviation.
C. Indeterminate evaluations.
- 1. State that no conclusion can be made with respect to the impact of the deviation on the item due.to the lack of sufficient data.-
(
O 2
Attachment'6.4 l' '
CPP-016 Revision: 4 Page 1 of'1 l' CALCULATION TITLE PAGE-jr i
- i. t
,N CALCULATION YlTLE PAGE CLitut & MedgGT "8 E ' 8' i 190C0 == MCEE FRE C ALCULATIES TITLE l
CA LCUL ATION 10(NTiraCaTl0N Nuts $( A 1
- APP A0V ALS = $ 48NATU AE & D ATE PRIPA AE R ISI/DATE(S) f ggygggggggj/gp,yg ggg n
G l
l l
l
\
Attachment 6.5
, CPP-016 Revision: 5 Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM OF INDETERMINATE EVALUATION m me e MW .suenstionat QA/QC.RT-Enetty and 9, ritt Environment Greig teoM (te.d SSEc Disciptine Engineer)
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Safety Significant Evaluation Safety Significant tvaluation dated describes a condition that is indeterminate because documentation could not be located. See the VII.c Results Report for the population. Appendix No. . section _,
entitled for further eva*uation of the safety significance of the reported deviation.
O Discipline Engineer Lead Discipline Engineer Construction Engineering Safety Significance Evaluation Evaluation Group Group Lead Discipline En61neer Supervisor Construction Engineering Safety Significance Evaluation Evaluation Group Group cet TUCCO QA/CC Records Management Coord. Engineer Supervisor SSEG Supervisor CEEG ERC Tile I
._RCl. .SY.ttom_s Integratles 32ti ;erma r:,n m eno PO Bes 10107 Fa#as Wginia 22030 (703) 2a6 0200 1$12/ FORMS 2
- - - -