ML20236N684

Change Notice 001 to Rev 0 to Procedure CPP-025, QC Inspector Qualification Evaluation

ML20236N684
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	10/08/1986
From:	Hansel J, Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20236N530	List: ML20236N533 ML20236N539 ML20236N544 ML20236N549 ML20236N552 ML20236N556 ML20236N563 ML20236N573 ML20236N579 ML20236N584 ML20236N593 ML20236N604 ML20236N611 ML20236N618 ML20236N619 ML20236N640 ML20236N648 ML20236N655 ML20236N660 ML20236N672 ML20236N684 ML20236N705 ML20236N718 ML20236N732 ML20236N743 ML20236N751 ML20236N766 ML20236N777 ML20236N785 ML20236N789 ML20236N796 ML20236N810 ML20236N816 ML20236N825 ML20236N841 ML20236N848 ML20236N854 ML20236N876 ML20236N887 ML20236N898 ML20236N903 ML20236N921 ML20236N934 ML20236N946 ML20236N966 ML20236N975 ML20236P008 ML20236P012 ML20236P033 ML20236P038 ... further results
References
CPP-025-01, CPP-25-1, NUDOCS 8708120066
Download: ML20236N684 (2)

Text

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -

4 Paga 1 of 2 s.

i  ;

,s EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION

-( -

97,'. 1 e?%

l _ ,.-f,

,h ' Q.y,o

. . - ,y ,.

l-

..\

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE ICR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS CHANGE NOTICE: 001 PROCEDURE NO: CPP-025 REVISION: 0 ISSUE DATE: 10-08-86 G i V

~

QC INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION EVALUATION The CPP identified above is hereby changed as shown on the attached page of this notice.

l Prepared.by: Date: /8[8[80 Approved by: 'Date: /d 8' /

Ed On-SiteyRepresentative Approved by: L Date: /d 8$

QA ' Review Tea'm Leader /I 87081 N 066 870731 5 PDR ADOCK 0500 A

._____-______-_D

Chtngs Notica 001 CPP-025 Revision: 0

1. Change the NOTE in Section 5.1 to read:

t0 "Should a DR be invalid, the Coordinator' records reasonable justification which supports the conclusion on the form, enters "N/A" to indicate "not applicable" in the spaces provided for the signatures of the first reviewers and originator, then signs and dates it.

The Coordinator ensures that any information used in the validation process is traceable to an seceptable source document and is referenced on the form. Any attachments are indicated on the form.

Due to the extensive reviews required to be conducted by the ISAP I.d.1 Coordinator to determine the validity of the DRs, the Coordinator is responsible for their disposition.

Therefore, the signature concurrence of the originator and/or the first reviewers in validity determinations of DRs relative to QC Inspector certification is unnecessary."

l O

2