ML20236N705
| ML20236N705 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 04/28/1987 |
| From: | Zill R EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236N530 | List:
|
| References | |
| CPP-026, CPP-26, NUDOCS 8708120071 | |
| Download: ML20236N705 (9) | |
Text
. - _ - _ _ .
Page 1 of 7 s
n EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP 0FATION l
UNCONTROLLED COPY COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS FROCEDURE NO: CPP-026 I REVISION: 1 ISSUE DATE: 04/28/87
[
FINAL REVIEW OF ISAP VII C AND OTHER SELECTED ISAP WORKING FILES Prepared by: 78E;/2rf.I.f Date: y/2 7/rJ
- T Approved by: _
Date: Y-[7,87 Ony' Site QA y resentative Approved by: [
ON/QC Review Team Leader Date: _4[2 84 O
s 8708120071 870731 '
PDR !
A ADDCK 0500044S '
ppg ,
l
CPP-026 Revision: 1 FINAL REVIEW 0F ISAP VII.C WORKING FILES l' J l 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this proced te is to establish methods and responsibilities for the Eg ineering Assurance final review and assembly of records and supporting documentation (working files) required for ISAP VII.c and other selected ISAPs, prior to turnover l !
to the Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) Project Central File. !
2.0 APPLICABILITY This procedure applies to the working files generated by QA/QC Engineering and Inspection to support the ISAP VII.c and other selected ISAP Results Reports. l
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 ISAP VII.c 3.2 ISAP VII.b.3 3.3. ISAP VII.b.4 A
i) v 3.4 CPP-004 Project Working Files 3.5 CPP-005 Establishing Populations j 3.6 CPP-006 Sample Selection 3.7 CPP-007 Preparation of Checklists and Data Base Reports 3.8 CPP-008 Preparation of Verification Packages 3.9 CPP-009 Performance of Reinspection and Documentation Reviews 3.10 CPP-010 Preparation of Deviation Reports 3.11 PAG-02 Guide on Assembly of CPRT Program Central and Working }
Files 4.0 GENERAL The Working Files shall be accurate, complete, and in good physical condition prior to turnover to the CPRT Project Central File. The files shall also be fully supportive of all conclusions and l commitments made in the ISAP Results Report. j h
a
- l l
2 l l
J
.- 1 CPP-026 y- Revision: 1 4.1 Responsibilities 4.1.1 The Engineering Assurance Supervisor has overall responsibility for the administration and implementation of this procedure.
4.1.2 Q*./QC Lead Discipline Engineering is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the Verification Packages and other documentation required for the Workir.g Files.
-4.1.3 Engineering Assurance (EA) Reviewers are responsible i 4 for the final review of ISAP VII.c and other selected ISAP documentation, obtaining resolution to problems _l identified during review,-and assembling the files for turnover to the CPRT Project Central File. Each EA reviewer will be responsible for identifying open items which will be monitored until satisfactory resolution -l.
is achieved.
4.2 Policy Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the latest Comanche Peak Response Team Program Plan', ERC Management Program Plan, and applicable !
ISAP.
\
The' Engineering Assurance Supervisor may delegate authority to
-individuals under his supervision.
4.3 -Conflicts !
In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.
4.4 Definitions !
4.4.1 Working File: A collection of records / documents received or generated as a result of QA/QC Review Team activities which contain material, or references to material in other controlled files upon which the conclusions of ISAP Results Reports are based.
4.4.2 Record
Those documents which furnish documentary evidence of the quality of items and/or activities affecting quality. For the purposes of this procedure, records will consist of the forms and other documents generated by QA/QC Review Team as required by CPRT Program Plan, ISAP and implementing procedures that meet the above definition; e.g., Inspection checklists, l Supplemental Inspection Instructions, calculations required to substantiate an engineering conclusion, etc.
3 L ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
-CPP-026
'. Revision: -1 i
4.4.3 Documentation
Any written or pictorial information' l I
' describing, defining, specifying, reporting .or Os certifying activities, requirements, procedures, or results. Documentation provided by the client will be- j considered informational material used as supporting' documentation; e.g.. copies of drawings, Design Change Authorizations, B&R Inspection Reports, etc.
4.4.4 Administrative change: A change or correction that does not alter the meaning or intent of the originator.
l For the purposes of this procedure, such changes or corrections may only be made when the correct entry can.
be verified elsewhere in the documentation or procedures; e.g., transposition'of a drawing number, incorrect title of a document, "N/A" entry in a date block when procedurally no other entry could be made, overriding page numbers, enhancement of record copies.
5.0 PROCEDURE The review of ISAP Working Files will' consist of four phases described as follows: l Phase 1: Review of selected documentation in the Working File that will be used as reference material during the later phases of review. The selected documents, as applicable, are j' identified as follows:
Master Population List Population Descriptions Population items list (text)
Random Sample Identification List Engineered Sample List ,
Quality Instruction Description Memoranda Quality Instruction Revision Memoranda Work Process Memoranda Accessibility Memoranda Phase II: Review of Verification Packages for accuracy and completeness.,
l Phase III: Review of individual population and other selected ISAP results reports and Working Files for adequacy and completeness.
Phase IV: Review of ISAP VII.c Results Report for accuracy and completeness.
l 4
e k t.
CPP-026
' Revision: 1 !
5.1 Administrative Changes L g j ' Administrative changes or corrections which do not alter the meaning or intent of Working File documentation or records may be made by EA reviewers. Changes or corrections made by EA reviewers shall be initialled and dated except page numbering-as described in Paragraphs 5.1.2.1 and 5.1.2.2. Rereview and approval by authorized personnel in originating organizations is not required for administrative changes. All other changes or corrections shall be made by responsible personnel within the originating organization. Any change or correction other than page number to a Deviation Report requires redistribution of the DR per CPP-010.
5.1.1 Engineering Assurance Reviewers may enhance record copies of nonreproducible records. Enhancement shall be made on a copy of the nonreproducible record. The copy shall.be annotated, signed and dated'by the EA reviewer stating the copy has been enhanced for legibility purposes only. The enhanced copy shall be attached to the nonreproducible record and will remain in the Working Files.
5.1.2 Engineering Assurance shall have the authority to override existing page numbers of individual records / documents as described below:
['2h 5.1.2.1 An Engineering Assurance Table of Contents
\s / shall be prepared and included in each Verification Package to provide consistency in the order of records and documents within the package. Sequential page numbers shall be assigned to the records and appropriately t recorded on the Table of Contents.
5.1.2.2 Within a Working File, sequential page numbers shall be assigned to all documents / records except Verification Packages and appropriately recorded on the )
applicable index.
5.2 Working File Indices Engineering Assurance shall review documents referenced in Para. 3.0 to determine minimum requirements for Working Files ;
to support the ISAP Results Report or ISAP VII.c Appendices l Results Reports. The required records will be identified on indices which will be included with the files to be turned l over to the CPRT Project Central File. *(Attachment 6.1 VII.c '
Population Index) Additional documentation may be added to the indices ts the results reports are written.
- Oteer ISAP indices will be tailored to their O rer,uir ement s .
5
- CPP-026
.c Revision: 1 5.3 Review Checkl'ists Prior to. reviewing documentation, Engineering Assurance shallL preparo checklists based on requirements of documents
. referenced in Para.-3,0._ _ Reviews,shall be documented on pre-established checklists. l 5.3.1 Sequence of review for each population Working File !
shall Pa ra .be in accordance with the reviews described in
- 5. 0, 5.3.2 Review Checklists w'ill' remain with the documents and/or packages until the Working F1i' es are assembled.
l statused as being in satisfactory conditions, and ready for turnover to the CPRT Project Central File except as noted in Para. 5.3.3.
5.3.3 Documents or packages withdrawn from the Records Center after review has been completed will be processed through Engineering Assurance. The checklist will be removed from the reviewed file and retained by the reviewer until the document / package is. returned. At that time, the checklist will be updated to reflect any changes made to the package or documents and returned to the Records Center. See Para. 5.5.1.
5.4 Resolution of Problems Problems identified during review of a given document or package that cannot be resolved prior to completing the review shall be entered on the ISAP/ Population EA Open Items List. l Resolution of problems shall be annotated on the list and the appropriate checklist to indicate closure of open items.
5.5 Completion of Reviews 5.5.1 Upon completion of each review, the documentation becomes the responsibility of Engineering Assurance until ready for tornover to the CPRT Project Central File. Although the documentation will be retained in the Records Center, withdrawal of files will require the consent of Engineering Assurance.
~
5.5.2 For ISAP VII.c and other selected ISAPs, after a population Working File or 1 SAP Working File is ready to be turned over to the CPRT Project Central File, the population index will be completed. The Engineering Assurance Reviewer will sign the population index signifying the satisfactory completion of the review and the assembly of the Working File with the concurrence of'the Engineering Assurance Supervisor.
O 5.5.3 The Engineering Assurance Supervisor shall obtain the V
approval signatures of the Lead Discipline Engineer, CEEG Supervisor and the applicable Issue Coordinator.
6
_ ___________ __--_-_ -- - - - _ - L
e CPP-026 4 Revision: 1 5.5.4 Jpon completion and approval of the ISAP/ Population O' index the Engineering Assurance Supervisor will notify the Records Administrator that the file (c) are acceptable for turnover to the CPRT Project Central File. Reference CPP-004.
6.0 gTACHMENTS 6.1 Action Plan VII.c Population Index l
9 O
7
5 ATTACHMENT 6.1 l ACTION PLAN VII.c POPULATION INDEX CPP-026 j Revision: 1 l
Pags 1 of 2
{
POPULATION NAME: Prepared by: PAGE 1 of EA SUPERVISOR DATE POPULATION ENGINEER DATE l
CEEG SUPERVISOR DATE i i
VII.c ISSUE COORDINATOR DATE '
NO .
DESCRIPTION I 3
REQUIRED (1.) NO.
By Reference W.F. WORKINGFILElPAG LOCATION ;
! 1 POPULATION RESULTS REPORT 8.A 2 POPULATION DESCRIPTION 4.B.1 3 POPULATION ITEMS LIST 4.B.2 4
RANDOM SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION LIST 4.B.3
{
5 QUALITY INSTRUCTIONS XXX.3.D 6
0.I. DESCRIPTION / REVISION MEMORANDA 4.B.5 7 ACCESSIBILITY MEMORANDUM 4.B.6 l 8 WORK PROCESS MEMORANDUM 4.B.8 9
REINSPECTION VERIFICATION PACKAGES (3) 5 C.1, 10 DOCUMENT REVIEW VERIFICATION PACKAGES (3) 7.B.1 11 REINSPECTION DEVIATION REPORTS (2) 5.C.2 j 12 DOC. REVIEW DEVIATION REPORTS (2) 7.B.2 13 OA/QC PROGRAM DEVIATION REPORTS XXX.7.F 14 REINSPECTION SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIOF 6.A.1 4
[ 15' DOC. REVIEW SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION l
6.A.2
! 16 GENERIC CALCULATIONS S.S.E.'s 6.A.3
- 17. OUT-0F-SCOPE MEMORANDA i i XXX.7.D I 18 RESULTS REPORT ENGINEERING BACKUP 8.B DOC. AND CORRESPONDENCE (SEE PAGE 2) i ,
(1.) "N/A" indicates Record / Document was not required for this population, (2.) Generic i l
, O j3.) Record the number of packages in the (NO. PAGES) column.
A./
POPINDX/ FORMS 2
CPP-026 Revision: 1' Pass.2 of 2 POPULATION INDEX INSTRUCTION
'(
, i 1). Each working ' file shall be identified by a unique alphanumeric .
. code, example as follows: j
-j VII.c 4.B.1/ CONC 32, A. ISAP VII.c A) B) C) D) B. Working File Code C. Individual Population Abbreviation.
D. Line Number on Population Index.
- 2) Files required by reference will be turned over separately and may not be included in any specific population.
3)
E. A. Reviewer rhall indicate with a check mark under W.F. for.the i required files being included in the population records inventory.
- 4) .Under "No. Pages" the E.A. Reviewer is to record the total number of pages as contained in each of the working files. (See note'3 for exception).
- 5) Correspondence Files (W.T. 9.A): All documents are to be originels or record copies and are to'be listed individually on the population index by subject and/or document nustber.
- 6) Item No. 9 & 10. For populations having both reinspection (I) and document reviews (R), file the packages in numerical order t( . placing the "R" packages immediately behind its corresponding "I" package.
O POPINDX/ FORMS 2
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -