IR 05000285/1986009

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:32, 23 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-285/86-09 on 860407-11.No Violation or Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Organization & Administration,Offsite Review Committee,Offsite Support Staff & Records Program
ML20197J624
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 05/08/1986
From: Hunter D, Murphy M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20197J614 List:
References
50-285-86-09, 50-285-86-9, NUDOCS 8605200100
Download: ML20197J624 (4)


Text

..

.

APPENDIX U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION IV

NRC Inspection Report: 50-285/86-09 License: DPR-40 Docket: 50-285 Licensee: Omaha Public Power District (OPPD)

1623 Harney Street Omaha, Nebraska 68102 Facility Name: Fort Calhoun Station Inspection At: Corporate Offices, Omaha, Nebraska Inspection Conducted: April 7-11, 1986 Inspector: r/4 /F4 H. E. Murphy, TrojecFIngctor, Project Date '

Sectir B, Reactor Projects Branch Approved: v ~

8 &(

D. R. Hunter, Chief, Project Section B, Date Reactor Projects Branch Inspection Summary Inspection Conducted April 7-11, 1986 (Report 50-285/86-09)

Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced inspection of the licensee's organization and administration, offsite review committee, offsite support staff, and records progra Results: Within the four areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie PDR ADOCK 05000285 G PDR

.

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted OPPD R. Andrews, Division Manager, Nuclear Production W. Bateman, Supervisor, Corporate Quality Assurance J. Fisicaro, Supervisor, Nuclear Regulatory and Industry Affairs S. Gambhir, Section Manager, Generating Station Engineering

  • J. Gasper, Manager, Administrative Services W. Gates, Manager, Fort Calhoun Statiun
  • J. Gloshen, Manager, Records Management
  • R. Jaworski, Section Manager, Technical Services
  • B. Livingston, Manager, Engineering Services K. Morris, Division Manager, Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs
  • 0. Hunderloh, Sr. Engineer, Nuclear Regulatory and Industry Affairs
  • A. Richard, Manager, Quality Assurance P. Walling, Supervisor, Administrative Services S. Willrett, Administrative Services and Security Supervisor
  • Denotes those attending the exit interview on April 11, 198 . Followup On Previously Identified Items (0 pen) (50-285/83-17-01) Failure to take prompt corrective action - The licensee has upgraded the onsite QA records file room to satisfy the requirements of ANSI N45.2.9-1979 for a single record storage facility and is a dual storage facility for all microfilmable QA record The licensee has also completed the commitment of identifying all missing construction records and has completed the evaluation to determine the safety signifi-cance of the identified records. However, subsequent to this evaluation, the licensee received a violation (50-285/8503-02) concerning a failure to meet record retrieval requirements. This same inspection report also discussed an unresolved item concerning unavailable records. Inspection Report 50-285/85-22, the results of the Special Systems Outage Modification Inspection (Design), also highlighted several examples of problems with design change development due to missing or inaccessible design base

, documentatio The NRC inspector also could not find where the licensee

'

had addressed the specific issue of the failure to take prompt corrective actio . Organization and Administration This inspection was to determine that any changes made to the licensee's onsite organization are in conformance with the requirements of the Technical Specifications and if the licensee's use of overtime is in conformance with regulatory requirement .o

.

The licensee's onsite organization has not changed since the last inspection in this area and is functioning as described in the facility's Technical Specification The NRC inspector reviewed a copy of OPPD's payroll statistics by employee for 1985. There were no deviations from maximum overtime limit No violations or deviations were identifie . Offsite Support Staff The purpose of this inspection was to determine that the offsite support staff functions are performed by qualified personne The NRC inspector noted that the size of the offsite support staff has remained essentially at the same level since October 198 Department / Group October 1982 April 1986 Generating Station Engineering 83 90 (Engineers) (45) (46)

(Designers / Draftsmen) (28) (33)

(Clerical) (10) (11)

Licensing 3 5 Technical Services 54 42 Quality Assurance 14 14 Review of personnel records and interviews with various members of the offsite staff did not identify any questions or inconsistencies concerning the individual qualification Each department and group maintained administrative procedures which described the responsibilities, authority, lines of communication and interfaces with site personnel and organization No violations or deviations were identifie . Offsite Review Committee The purpose of this inspection was to determine if the functions of offsite review are being performed in accordance with regulatory requirement The offsite review committee at OPPD is called the " Safety Audit and Review Committee" (SARC).

The NRC inspector reviewed the SARC Charter, Revision 8, January 10, 1986; SARC Procedure No. 1, "SA and RC Records," Revision 5, January 10, 1986; SARC Procedure No. 2, "SA and RC Reviews," Revision 5, February 15, 1984; and, SARC Procedure No. 3, "SA and RC Auditing," Revision 8, January 10, 1986. This review confirmed the licensee's conformance to Technical Specification requirements with respect to the composition, duties, and responsibilities of and the administrative controls over the SAR .w

.

SARC meeting minutes for 1984 and 1985 were reviewed by the NRC inspecto This review determined that scheduled audits were performed and followup actions.were properly reviewed and closed. Audits were scheduled per the Technical Specification frequenc No violations or deviations were identifie . Records Program The purpose of this inspection was to determine that the licensee is implementing a program relating to the control of records that is in conformance with regulatory requirement The NRC inspector reviewed standing order C-2, Revision 21, October 2, 1985,

" Fort Calhoun Station Quality Assurance (QA) Records," Quality Assurance Plan Manual, Section 3.4, " Records Management," Revision 0, September 1, 1984, and other departmental administrative control procedures. This review verified that required records have been identified, storage requirements are adequately described and responsibilities have been assigned and controls established to assure proper transfer, retention and maintenance of the identified QA record In reviewing implementation of the records program, the NRC inspector discussed the following concerns with representatives of the license Attempts to locate a microfilm address for some records generated within the past year were unsuccessful. Records that were over one year old had a higher success rate. The continued practice of various departments onsite to hold, as " working files," completed procedures for as much as a year does not provide "readily retrievable" record In most cases, these records are safely stored, but in some cases the NRC inspector found whole boxes of records that were "in transit" being held in non-firerated containers, open areas, and under tables in the office areas onsit The NRC inspector discussed backlog for microfilming with the manager of records management and was informed that there was no present backlog of records under his cognizance. The major backlog for construction records duplication that existed in the last 2 to 3 years has been eliminate The licensee is continuing the assessment of missing construction records and design basis records and has made commitments in this area as identified in the responses to violation 50-285/8317-01 and Inspection Report 50-285/85-2 No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview An exit interview was conducted April 11, 1986, with personnel identified in paragraph 1 of this repor At this meeting, the scope of the inspection and the findings were summarize .

I