ML19263C150

From kanterella
Revision as of 20:48, 1 February 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC 781226 Ltr Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-254/78-30 & 50-265/78-30.Corrective Actions: Discussion W/Personnel Stressing Need for Maintaining Close Control of Low Power Range Monitor Calibr
ML19263C150
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/1979
From: Reed C
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML19261A721 List:
References
NUDOCS 7902080034
Download: ML19263C150 (3)


Text

.

Commonwealth Edison One First Nabonal Plaza. Chicago. Ilhnois O,-

Address Reply to Post Ofhce Box 767 Chicago. tilinois 60690 January 16, 1979 Mr. James G. Keppler, Director Directorate of Inspection and Enforcement - Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137

Subject:

Quad-Citics Station Unit 2 Response to IE Inspection Report No. 50-265/78-30 NRC Docket No. 50-265 Reference (a) : Gaston Fiorelli letter to Byron Lee, Jr.

dated December 26, 1978

Dear Mr. Keppler:

Reference (a) transmitted an inspection report S.

regarding an inspection conducted by Messrs. E. Chow and J.

Creswell of yca;- office on November 15-17, 1978 of activities at Quad-Cities Ktelear Power Station Unit 2. Reference (a) indicated that certain of our activities appeared to be in The item of noncompliance noncompliance with NRC recuirements.

is addressed in the attachment to this letter.

Please address any additional questions that you might have to this office.

Very truly yours,

\

(~ \

Cordell Reed Assistant Vice-President attachment 79020800M D _

Commonwealth Edison NRC Docket No. 50-265 ATTACHMENT INFRACTION Technical Specification 6.2.A.7 requires the licensee to follow surveillance and testing procedures. Surveillance pro-cedure OTS 1311-4 requires a Local Power Range Monitor (LPRM) to be bypassed when the bypassing criterion is exceeded.

Contrary to the above, LPRM 40-17-C was not bypassed on March 13, 1978 when the bypassing criterion was exceeded.

DISCUSSION

  • The Inspection Summary identified two LPRMs that, in the inspectior's opinion, should have been bypassed per procedure QTS 1311-4, which specifies a criteria for bypassing Local Power Range Monitors (LPRM). These were LPRM 40-17 C on April 18, 1978 and LPRM 40-17 A on March 13, 1978.

The station agrees that LPRM 40-17 C was detected as being high on April 18, 1978 and should have been bypassed on that date (the March 13 date stated in the notice of violation appears to be a transcription error).

Procedure OTS 1311-4 allows an engineer to "te judgment in deciding if an LPRM must be bypassed in certain conservative cases, and thus bypassing LPRM 40-17 A on March 13, 1978 was not required. On March 13, 1978, the unit was being started up after a refueling outage, and it is normal to find LPRMs out of calibration before they are calibrated above 50% power.

CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN AND RESULTS ACHIEVED A review of the procedures for the calibration and bypassing of LPRMs (OTS 1311-1 and 4) was conducted. In addition, a review was made of the number of LPRMs that are being bypassed and the reasons for their being bypassed. Over the last 15 months the station's normal surveillance procedures have resulted in over 60 LPRMs being bypassed for high readings, 30 LPRMs being bypassed for low or downscale readings, and more than 30 others for various hardware problems. It is felt that these procedures are adequate and not in need of change.

Commonwealth Edison NRC Docket No. 50-265

_2_

CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER NONCOMPLIANCE This item of noncompliance and the need for maintaining close control of the LPRM calibration was discussed with the personnel responsible for LPRM surveillance.

In addition, LPRMs of a new design, which should be less subject to failure, have been purchased and will start to be installed on the next refueling outage of each unit.

DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED Full compliance is achieved at this time.